Who disliked the video.If it is a shia may Allah (SWT) bring the shia to the sirat-Al-Mustaqim inshaAllah
@XavierXe5 жыл бұрын
@Abbas Ali👋 is this u abbas ali
@mazuzu34515 жыл бұрын
Allah’s Soldier I disliked because your religion is stupid
@_chrni4 жыл бұрын
Ma Zuzu cry me a river that’s why ours is the fastest growing
@Shah_husain4 жыл бұрын
@@mazuzu3451 u follow an imam who is hiding somewhere for centuries and is afraid of persecution. So cowardly and gay he is
@Shah_husain3 жыл бұрын
@@m_570 they were mentioned in the Qur'an what about imam ghaib
@Burna10095 жыл бұрын
Abu Bakr's RA succesion is praised by Allah. Allah SWT says: O you who believe! Whoever from among you turns back from his religion(Islam), Allah will bring a people whom He will love and they will love Him; humble towards the believers, stern towards the disbelievers, fighting in the way of Allah, and never afraid of the blame of the blamers. That is the Grace of Allah which He bestows on whom He wills. And Allah is All-sufficient for His creature’s needs, All-Knower”}. (Quran 5:54). This verse was, of course, revealed during the lifetime of the Nabi SAS, and yet it alluded to something that was to occur after the Prophet’s SAS death. Immediately after the Prophet SAS died, many people apostatised, rejecting faith after having believed. Allah SWT had previously warned them that, if they were ever to turn away from their religion, He SWT would {“bring a people whom He will love and they will love him - humble towards the believers, stern towards the disbelievers, fighting in the way of Allah, and never afraid of the blame of blamers”}. Those people, it turned out, consisted of Abubakr RA and the members of his army who fought against the apostates. That Allah SWT lavished such praise upon Abubakr AS and those under his command confirms Abubakr AS as the rightful Khaleefah after the Prophet’s death. Allah’s promise in the above mentioned verse came true: Abubakr RA and those under his command fought against the apostates, doing so for the sake of Allah SWT and fearing no human being that stood in their way. Abubakr’s army defeated the apostates, the verse leaves us with a clear message.
@rab2515 жыл бұрын
EXPLAIN PLEASE WHY LADY FATIMA A.S. WAS ANGRY AT THOSE CALIPHS????IS IT IN SAHIH BUKHARI??ALLAH IS ALL KNOWING !!LANAT BE ON THEM.....AND ALL WHO FOLLW THEM....
@Burna10095 жыл бұрын
@@rab251 Thank you for your mature and sophisticated question. Can you show us where Fatima (RA) was angry with the Caliphs (RA).
@Burna10095 жыл бұрын
@Muhammed Asghar Dharani The sermon of fadak does not show Fatima (RA) was upset with the 'CALIPHS.' And the sermon is not even authentic as can be seen in Tarikh Dimashq volume 45 around page 441. The disagreement between Fatima (RA) and Abu Bakr (RA) is well known. But what if Abu Bakr was right with withholding the inheritance from her? Should he disobey and appose the Prophet SAAS and give the inheritance to Fatima RA. Abu Bakr withheld the inheritance from Fatima as well as his own daughter Aisha..
@Burna10095 жыл бұрын
@Muhammed Asghar Dharani That hadith was in reply to Ali ibn Abi Talib RA wanting to marry the daughter of Abu Jahl. Did Ali anger Fatima RA? And therefore angered the Messenger SAAS? And therby angered Allah? Astaghfurallah no Ali was one of the most righteous and was corrected by the Prophet SAAS. The same way Ali obeyed the Prophet in regards to the marriage, the same way Abu Bakr obeyed the Prophet with the inheritance.
@d.k34165 жыл бұрын
@@Burna1009 U Nailed it Bro!!👍
@mrahman28975 жыл бұрын
Shias will never accept 'allusions' and will always come up with their own interpretation and will reject any sunni hadith, this fitna has been going on for centuries and unfortunately will not stop until qiyama.
@mikhan51915 жыл бұрын
They also reject Quran!!
@HajjiJesus5 жыл бұрын
@@mikhan5191 Worse, they can not bring one Single Authentic Narration from their books and prove why it is Authentic. They are the People of Fabrications.
@Turaab26084 жыл бұрын
@@mikhan5191 That is not true.
@mikhan51914 жыл бұрын
@@Turaab2608 - r u a Shia?
@ali.rn_3 жыл бұрын
@@mikhan5191 please elaborate
@majorblazer9055 Жыл бұрын
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 03:43 📜 Verse 54 of Surat al-Ma'idah in the Quran is interpreted by some as alluding to the Caliphate of Abu Bakr, who fought against apostates after the death of the Prophet Muhammad. 05:12 🤔 The Shia need to question why Ali did not wage jihad against Abu Bakr and Umar if they believed that they had apostatized or usurped the caliphate. 06:50 🌟 Abu Bakr's actions align with the Quranic promise that if people apostatize after the Prophet's death, a group will arise to fight for the faith, which is seen as fulfilled by Abu Bakr and his army. 07:17 🤷♂️ Critics of this interpretation often resort to far-fetched excuses and conspiracy theories to refute it instead of accepting the apparent meaning of the Quranic verse. Made with HARPA AI
@mohibhanif17595 жыл бұрын
Subhanallah, as a Sunni I did not know this. However I knew Abubakar Assidiq was explicitly mentioned by Allah in the Qur'an in Surah Tawbah: "Idh yaqulu lissaahibihi laa tahzan, innaAllaha ma'ana". Jazakallahu khayr for sharing beneficial knowledge ikhwani.
@maryammuslimah76605 жыл бұрын
All Muslims love Abu bakr (A.s) ..💘💙💗❤💓💟💞💝..
@Farhan_in_Delhi4 жыл бұрын
Don't use the word a.s, please use radiallahu anh
@Unemi1344 жыл бұрын
The Messenger of Allah is our sun, Abu Bakr is our moon, Umar is our gold, Uthman is our martyr(sehid), Ali he is a witness for the three firs khalif and a defender of the Holy Qur'an.
@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo65432 жыл бұрын
@@Farhan_in_Delhi Alehas Salam is ok like in out salat when we sit and say Atahayatu Lilahi wa salawatu wa Tayabatuu .... etc.
@Sunnah-e3m3 ай бұрын
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543attahiyyatu*
@Sunnah-e3m3 ай бұрын
@@Farhan_in_Delhiplease do unsubscribe the unwanted channels😢
@adamahmadbey7145 жыл бұрын
One more verse for the caliphate of Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, alaihim assalam ajmaeen Quran 24: 55 (The arabic word used here is Khalefannahum means succession) Allah has promised those who have believed among you and done righteous deeds that He will surely grant them succession [to authority] upon the earth just as He granted it to those before them and that He will surely establish for them [therein] their religion which He has preferred for them and that He will surely substitute for them, after their fear, security, [for] they worship Me, not associating anything with Me. But whoever disbelieves after that - then those are the defiantly disobedient.
@millat_ibraheem5 жыл бұрын
I think you mean the arabic word is "layastakhlifannahum"
@maryammuslimah76605 жыл бұрын
All Muslims love Hz Abu bakr sidiqq☝☝☝☝☝☝
@adamahmadbey7145 жыл бұрын
ملة إبراهيم حنيفا yea
@maryammuslimah76605 жыл бұрын
Abbas Ali which post
@rab2515 жыл бұрын
@@maryammuslimah7660 Lanat on all Who lie
@mikhan51915 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Logical. Applicable to the events that happened during the rule of the Imam, the Khalifa Abu Bakr asSiddiq (ra) .
@aboetarikske5 жыл бұрын
We need those videos, twelvers are flooding yt with vids about imama.
@zaynsiddiqui9025 жыл бұрын
I was expecting Hani's story but this one is also great since I am Siddiqui 😍😍
@mahamfatima11773 жыл бұрын
Hani's story?
@zaynsiddiqui9023 жыл бұрын
@@mahamfatima1177 you are 2 years late in the party. Lol. We already got his story how he indulged in shia sunni polemics.
@mahamfatima11773 жыл бұрын
@@zaynsiddiqui902 ok tell me now lol
@zaynsiddiqui9023 жыл бұрын
@@mahamfatima1177 wait let me search for it. I'll ngive you link of the video
@mahamfatima11773 жыл бұрын
@@zaynsiddiqui902 ok m waiting
@mdtalhaansari10965 жыл бұрын
4:32 OMG! completely unexpected! rofl, so to speak!
@millat_ibraheem5 жыл бұрын
lol
@al74225 жыл бұрын
😂
@imranahmed15425 жыл бұрын
Great explanation with authentic hadiths and most importantly from the glorious majestic Quran. SubhanAllah
@acer9119115 жыл бұрын
Shias, GAME OVER. I sincerely hope may ya'll be guided to the straight path iA
@ramadhanmuzize64895 жыл бұрын
Maa shaa ALLAH .It's very clear.The only thing i see is that shiasm is one of worst fitnah we Muslims are facing.
@ibnyasin3 жыл бұрын
If Abu Bakr became an apostate, then who did he fight in the Riddah wars (the wars of apostasy)?
@aliaub755 жыл бұрын
May Allah SWT be pleased with Abu Bakr RA, Umar RA, Uthman RA and Ali RA.
@mahamfatima11774 жыл бұрын
Deserve millions like ❤️
@myfirstnamemylastname33435 жыл бұрын
I like it when i see alot of dislikes. It means alot of shias watched the video😂
@traditionalsunni6295 жыл бұрын
every one should read As Sawaiq Al Muharriqa of Ibn hajar makki r.a this is a gem.
@peepitsslayplaya53345 жыл бұрын
Abbas Ali liar lol where's your proof it was only allowed for fighters at war nowhere near their wives
@vaporsteam25875 жыл бұрын
@Abbas Ali I m pretty sure that incident with asma radillahu anha is about umrah not about mutah al nikah. Mutah means pleasure in Arabic language not everything related to mutah is mutah al nikah that you shias practice.
@Hudaifa.shinwary5 жыл бұрын
whos the first reciter ? seif?
@millat_ibraheem5 жыл бұрын
Enjoy kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZ2woJmcg7iZoKM
@XavierXe5 жыл бұрын
اس آیت کے شان نزول میں متعدد اور مختلف روایات مذکور ہیں۔ ان میں سب سے قابل اعتبار روایت یہ ہے کہ یہ آیت حضرت علی علیہ السلام اور ان کے اصحاب کے بارے میں نازل ہوئی ہے۔ اس روایت کو حضرات عمار، سہل بن سعد، سلمہ بن اکوع، ابو وقاص، ابوہریرہ، حذیفہ، ابن عباس اور امام محمد باقر علیہ السلام نے روایت کیا ہے: فتح خیبر کے موقع پر رسول کریمؐ نے حضرت علی علیہ السلام کے حق میں یہ الفاظ بیان فرمائے: اُعْطِیَنَّ الرَّاَیَۃَ غَداً رَجُلًا یُحِبُّ اللّٰہَ وَ رَسَوْلَہُ وَ یُحِبُّہُ اللّٰہُ وَ رَسُولُہُ کَرَّاراً غَیْرَ فَرَّارٍ لاَ یَرْجِعُ حَتَّی یَفْتَحَِ اللّٰہُ عَلَی یَدِیْہِ ۔ (سنن ابن ماجہ حدیث ۳۸۰۸۔ صحیح البخاری باب ما قیل فی لواء النبی حدیث ۲۸۱۲ و ۲۸۴۔صحیح مسلم فضائل علی)کل میں علم ایسے مرد کو دوں گا جو اللہ اور اس کے رسول (ص) سے محبت رکھتا ہے اور اللہ اور اس کا رسول (ص) اس سے محبت رکھتے ہیں۔ وہ پلٹ پلٹ کر حملہ کرنے والا ہو گا، فرار کرنے والا نہ ہو گا۔ وہ اس وقت تک واپس نہیں پلٹے گا جب تک اللہ اس کے ہاتھ فتح و نصرت عطا نہ کرے۔
@mahamfatima11773 жыл бұрын
Hazrat ali k bary main jo ahadith hain wo yeh hain k yeh muslmanon sy qital kryga or haq py hoga.
@shaheengk5352Ай бұрын
Taqqiya 😂😂😂 running rampant
@Azizam-j3c Жыл бұрын
Who are those who apostated during Abu Bakr's caliphate ? Can you list a few
@jasonwayne57285 жыл бұрын
Jazakallah Khair. May Allah reward the scholars of Sunni Defense for taking a stand for the truth, and defending the great Muslims of the past.
@Irfan--Khan5 жыл бұрын
Why Shias hate Abdullah ibn zubair? Please upload a video about this topic. 😊
@bilals21285 жыл бұрын
perhaps bcz he is the grandson of Abu Bakr. WAllahu Alam
@Irfan--Khan5 жыл бұрын
@@bilals2128, I know that bro. ☺
@aminemiloudi84545 жыл бұрын
He waged war against imam ali (as)
@Irfan--Khan5 жыл бұрын
@@aminemiloudi8454, Ok. 😒 Do you consider his revolt against yazid legitimate? Do you consider him a Martyr?
@aminemiloudi84545 жыл бұрын
@@Irfan--Khan they were both nasibi, so i don't care about his revolt.
@noorassunnah68515 жыл бұрын
This video also destroyed the below fabricated Hadith which is often quoted by Shias from tabqaat Ibn Saad. Abu Dharr narrates that Rasulullah (s) asked me ‘What will you do when the Imams after me shall take this property of Fai as their own? Abu Dharr said ‘I swear by He who made you a Prophet, I shall raise my sword and declare war until I take it back’. Rasulullah (s) said .I shall give you a better option, be patient until you meet me’. This fabricated report is destroyed by the promise of Allah in Quran, where Allah promises to bring a people who would fight the apostates contrary to ask them to be patient.
@MrJul125 жыл бұрын
Striking the evil of Shiaism at its core by citing verses of Quran that praise the 4 Khalifas, very well done and an excellent approach. I am aware that all the members of TSD have full time jobs and are very busy people, but despite the risk of sounding like an entitled brat, i humbly request two videos from the TSD team. Firstly, can you please make a video which refutes that Sahaba were munafiqun. Abu Kara who comes to speakers corner almost always cites this supposed ambiguity as evidence that Sahaba are evil. His basic premise is that the munafiqun and Sahaba are the same or that there alot of overlap between them. Also, the shias always criticize how loose our definition of Sahabi is, and that it is ridiculous. Can you also please make a video refuting that as well? i think the best way to refute this point would be to simply cite from their own books the definition of who is a Sahabi of their imams as well, and show that their definition of a Sahabi of their imams(someone who met the imams) is the same, or worse than the definition of a Sahabi of the Prophet(pbuh). Also, i would really appreciate it if you can link me some articles that deal with both the topics mentioned earlier. I tried to find them on twelvershia.net but i couldnt. May Allah(SWT) make it easier for you guys to make more videos refuting Shiaism!. Ameen!. Keep up the good work guys!
@AbuMuslimKhorasani5 жыл бұрын
This article may help: www.twelvershia.net/2013/08/24/response-to-is-allah-swt-pleased-with-the-companions/ Munafiqun (hypocrites) were a minority and that's the reason they were called that name. They would hide their beliefs - outwardly side with the Muslims and plot against them secretly. They first appeared in Madina when Muslims were MAJORITY and that's where the verses about Munafiqun were FIRST revealed. The takfiri and irrational Imami sect will try to portray the majority or most as the hypocrites and only a handful to be 'loyal'.
@MrJul125 жыл бұрын
@@AbuMuslimKhorasani JazakAllah Khair Bro Abu Muslim. Is there anything on the definition of Sahabi according to Shia(by Sahabi i mean someone who meet the imams and transmitted information from them) compared with definition of Sahabi(someone who meet the prophet(pbuh) and transmitted information) according to Sunnis as well?
@AbuMuslimKhorasani5 жыл бұрын
@@MrJul12 Wa iyyak I forgot to share this link as it is also relevant: www.twelvershia.net/2016/06/02/adalat-al-sahaba/ Not sure if there is any article on that topic on twelvershia.net.
@MrJul125 жыл бұрын
@@AbuMuslimKhorasani I love you for the sake of Allah!!. JazakAllah Khair for the articles bro. I will definitely give them a read. May Allah bless you and your channel. One complaint i have is that you dont post alot of content with English translation. So please post more content with english translation or in the english language. Also, i am aware that you and Ebn Hussain are busy people and you guys do this work on top of having full time jobs. Maybe you and Ebn Hussain can do a collaboration together to ease the burden? but that is an advice. May Allah keep you safe Abu Muslim and may Allah make it easy for you, TSD, and Ebn Hussain to make more videos and raise awareness against the Shia. Ameen! I will remember you guys in my duas.
@Ali-wg3lj5 жыл бұрын
What is a Sahabi- kzbin.info/www/bejne/j4K0l3WohdiWqNE
@irfankurrimbux54455 ай бұрын
Thu'laba bin Hatib was a companion who didn't pay zakaat during the lifetime of the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و اله و سلم and He took no action against him ! Malik bin Nuweira refused to pay to Abu Bakr because he didn't recognised him as the legal caliph and the latter send Khalid bin Walid to kill him !!! When Surat Al Baqarat was revealed, the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و اله و سلم sent Abu Bakr to deliver it to the Meccans, but shortly afterwards sent Imam Ali عليه الصلاة و السلام to take it back from Abu Bakr. The reason was that the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و اله و سلم said : NO BODY DELIVERS AN AYAT EXCEPT ME OR SOMEONE FROM ME !!! The ayat of the cave is not showing the virtue of Abu Bakr, on the contrary it's a reprimand, for the solace was descended on one of the two and solace is for the prophets and believers !!! Did you people know that Abu Bakr used OBSCENE language in front of the Holy Prophet ??? وأبو بكر الصديق خلف رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم قاعد فقال (قوله امصص بظر اللات) فتح الباري صحيح البخاري - ابن حجر - ج ٥ - الصفحة ٢٤٨ Abu Bakr was sitting behind the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و اله و سلم and he said (His saying, “SUCK THE CLITORS OF AL-LAT" The whole Surat Al Hujurat is reprimanding Abu Bakr & Omar !!! They were raising their voice in the presence of the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و اله و سلم and their deeds were SEIZED ! يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا تَرْفَعُوا أَصْوَاتَكُمْ فَوْقَ صَوْتِ النَّبِيِّ وَلَا تَجْهَرُوا لَهُ بِالْقَوْلِ كَجَهْرِ بَعْضِكُمْ لِبَعْضٍ أَن تَحْبَطَ أَعْمَالُكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تَشْعُرُونَ Abu Bakr does not know the meaning of 'abba' in Surat Abasa ! ( أبو بكر لا يعرف معنى ( { وَفَاكِهَةً وَأَبًّا ( عبس : 31 ) } ) ابن حجر العسقلاني - فتح الباري شرح صحيح البخاري كتاب بدء الخلق - باب : صفة الشمس والقمر الجزء : ( 6 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 211 / 212 ) - .... قوله : ( والأب ما تأكل الأنعام ) : وروى بن جرير من طريق إبراهيم التيمي : أن أبا بكر الصديق سئل عن ( الأب ) فقال : أي سماء تظلني وأي أرض تقلني إذا قلت في كتاب الله بغير علم. According to Sunnite historical sources, in the last moments of Abu Bakr’s life, ‘Abd al-Rahman told him: “…you have always been righteous and a reformer, [so] do not be upset for anything in this world.” And Abu Bakr answered, “Yes, I am not upset for anything in this world, except three things I have done and I wish I had not done them and three things I have not done and I wish I had done them and three things I wish I had asked the Prophet (s). But what I wish I had not done, first is that I wish I had not invaded the house of Fatima (a) even if they closed it to me for war, second is that I wish I had not burned Fuja’a Sullami and instead I either had killed or released him. The third is that I wish on the Day of Saqifa, I had left the caliphate on either of these two men ‘Umar or Abu ‘Ubayda that one of them would become the caliph and I would become his minister. But the three things I did not do and wish I had: the first is that when Ash’as ibn Qays was brought to me in captivity, I wish I had struck his neck, because I suspect he will enforce evil wherever he finds it; and the other one is that I wish when I sent Khalid Bin Waleed to the battle of the apostates I had remained at Zil Qissah so that I could help the army if they were defeated; and the third one, I wish that when I delegated Khalid to Sham I had sent Omar to Iraq so that I had opened my two hands in the cause of God. Then he opened his hands and added: I wish I had asked the Prophet of God (peace be upon him) that to whom the caliphate belonged, so that nobody would go to war on it; and I wish I had asked him did Ansar have any right in this matter; and I wish I had asked him if the the brother’s daughter and the father’s sister would inherit anything [from the deceased], because I’m not sure about it. Source: Târîkh Tabarî, v 3 p 429 ; Târîkh Ya’qûbî, v 2 p 137 ( أبو بكر يحرق أحاديث النبي (ص) ويمنع تدوينها ) ABU BAKR BURNS THE HOLY PROPHET'S AHADITH & FORBIDS WRITING THEM !!! الذهبي - تذكرة الحفاظ = طبقات الحفاظ للذهبي الطبقة الأولي من الكتاب - أبو بكر الصديق (ر) الجزء : ( 1 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 9 > 11 ) - .... ومن مراسيل ابن أبي مليكة : إن الصديق جمع الناس بعد وفاة نبيهم ، فقال : انكم تحدثون عن رسول الله (ص) أحاديث تختلفون فيها والناس بعدكم أشد اختلافا فلا تحدثوا عن رسول الله شيئا فمن سألكم ، فقولوا : بيننا وبينكم كتاب الله فاستحلوا حلاله وحرموا حرامه. - .... وقد نقل الحاكم ، فقال : حدثني : بكر بن محمد الصيرفي بمرو ، أنا : محمد ابن موسى البربري ، أنا : المفضل بن غسان ، أنا : علي بن صالح ، أنا : موسى بن عبد الله بن حسن بن حسن ، عن إبراهيم بن عمر بن عبيد الله التيمي ، حدثني : القاسم بن محمد ، قالت عائشة : جمع أبي الحديث عن رسول الله (ص) وكانت خمسمائة حديث فبات ليلته يتقلب كثيرا ، قالت : فغمني ، فقلت : أتتقلب لشكوى أو لشيء بلغك ، فلما أصبح ، قال : أي بنية هلمى الأحاديث التى عندك فجئته بها فدعا بنار فحرقها ، فقلت : لم أحرقتها ، قال : خشيت أن أموت وهي عندي فيكون فيها أحاديث عن رجل قد ائتمنته ووثقت ولم يكن كما حدثني : فأكون قد نقلت ذاك ، فهذا لا يصح والله أعلم.
@Suhan08055 жыл бұрын
4:33
@5shotslikerambo3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@lamb85203 жыл бұрын
Who's the reciter? It's so beautiful 😍
@osamak1232 жыл бұрын
JazakAllahu khairan
@9k-zt2pb5 ай бұрын
Ma sha Allah
@goofygoober154here Жыл бұрын
i love u bro keep going
@layalhaidar12922 жыл бұрын
What about when nabi Muhammad pbuh announced Ali as wali with his own tongue in front of everyone
@thatsmyname76615 жыл бұрын
N im guessing we getting some Hani next...
@millat_ibraheem5 жыл бұрын
You guessed wrong mate
@thatsmyname76615 жыл бұрын
@@millat_ibraheem haa dude where's the optimism
@alisayed44155 жыл бұрын
@@millat_ibraheem excuse me, who is Hani?
@mogliking123455 жыл бұрын
It’s not wrong to follow the hanafi madhab, right? I see people arguing over that
@bilals21285 жыл бұрын
Pavel Nedved yes, There is nothing wrong with following the Hanafi madhab. Following any of the madhabs is permissible
@thestealth24485 жыл бұрын
Pavel Nedved ofcourse not. Anyone who says that today is misguided
@TheSlaveOfAllah19925 жыл бұрын
Dont be a narrow-minded one. Each madhab has much in common, however, some things differ from the other but no big deal. Take wisdom from everyone and if something that goes against the Qur'an throw it in the trash. Islam is based on justice, and anything that damages other people, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, can never be from Islam.😊
@aliaub755 жыл бұрын
The madhabs only differ in fiqh not aqeedah. Best not to blindly follow one particular sheikh or scholar...Prophet Muhammad SAW is the only person we blindly follow without a doubt. If it's an authentic hadith then that should be your madhab. May Allah SWT guide us all.
@arshadmahmood29552 жыл бұрын
May Allah bless you ma brother for exposing the misguided people in the ummah of prophet Muhammad S.A.W
@bramptonprankster81925 жыл бұрын
Sahih Muslim clearly states Prophet (pbuh) said he was leaving behind Noble Quran and Ahlul Bayt (family). Ali (as) announced as leader of Muslims at Ghadir Khum but Sunni brothers have another interpretation. The division started at the death of the Prophet. Shia’s follows the Hadith from Sahih Muslim which indicates the Prophet saying he was leaving behind two weighty things ie Noble Quran and Ahlul Bayt but again Sunnis have their own interpretation though it’s in their own book (see full Hadith and reference below) The speaker should please preach the “facts” to his masses. Reference from Noble Quran confirming purity of Ahlul Bayt: “......... Allah intends only to remove from you the impurity [of sin], O people of the [Prophet's] household, and to purify you with [extensive] purification”. (33:33) Who is the Ahlul Bayt? See Hadith from Sahih Muslim below: Hadith: Sahih Muslim, Book 31, Hadith 5920 Yazid b. Hayyan reported, I went along with Husain b. Sabra and 'Umar b. Muslim to Zaid b. Arqam and, as we sat by his side, Husain said to him: Zaid. you have been able to acquire a great virtue that you saw Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) listened to his talk, fought by his side in (different) battles, offered prayer behind me. Zaid, you have in fact earned a great virtue. Zaid, narrate to us what you heard from Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him). He said: I have grown old and have almost spent my age and I have forgotten some of the things which I remembered in connection with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), so accept whatever I narrate to you, and which I do not narrate do not compel me to do that. He then said: One day Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) stood up to deliver sermon at a watering place known as Khumm situated between Mecca and Medina. He praised Allah, extolled Him and delivered the sermon and. exhorted (us) and said: Now to our purpose. O people, I am a human being. I am about to receive a messenger (the angel of death) from my Lord and I, in response to Allah's call, (would bid good-bye to you), but I am leaving among you two weighty things: the one being the Book of Allah in which there is right guidance and light, so hold fast to the Book of Allah and adhere to it. He exhorted (us) (to hold fast) to the Book of Allah and then said: The second are the members of my household I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family. He (Husain) said to Zaid: Who are the members of his household? Aren't his wives the members of his family? Thereupon he said: His wives are the members of his family (but here) the members of his family are those for whom acceptance of Zakat is forbidden. And he said: Who are they? Thereupon he said: 'Ali and the offspring of 'Ali, 'Aqil and the offspring of 'Aqil and the offspring of Ja'far and the offspring of 'Abbas. Husain said: These are those for whom the acceptance of Zakat is forbidden. Zaid said: Yes. Based on above (Noble Quran 33:33 and Sahih Muslim Book 31, Hadith 5920) Shias consider Ali (as) as leader after Holy Prophet (pbuh). There are 12 Imams as confirmed in Sunni sources. Reference can be seen here: m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXLPpKl_lrV6ZpY m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/aWLUZZZpfZyNsM0
@fardowdo30yaayamaxammed65 жыл бұрын
but. prophet. (saw) didnt. say. obey ahlul.bayt right ? 4 khalifa. thy. did. take. care. Quran. and. ahalul. bayt. as. well. what. als u. expect.
@millat_ibraheem5 жыл бұрын
How does the sahih muslim hadith prove your belief?
@TheSlaveOfAllah19925 жыл бұрын
🤔 What about Zubair ibn al-Awwam, the prophet's cousin? Just because he was a general in the Rashidun army doesn't mean you pull him out of Ahl Al Bayt. What about the numerous other members of the Prophet's extended family named Kadhab (liars) by the Shia because they picked a side against Ali? Are these not kith and kin? If in the shia view this hadith attaches importance to the members of the prophet's family then it does so equally. Why do you mix and match? In the Sunni view, this hadith is giving charge to the people to take responsibility of his family (Thaqalyn lexically translates to responsibility or burden). It does not give them leadership roles. Sunnis revere the Ahl Bayt equally. 😊
@millat_ibraheem5 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlaveOfAllah1992 The hadith itself defines who the ahlul bayt are, it's funny he can't see that
@bramptonprankster81925 жыл бұрын
ملة إبراهيم حنيفا if you can’t understand your own Hadith book no one can help you.
@zainulabideenalikhan58495 жыл бұрын
Mashallah
@islamislife54603 жыл бұрын
The early imams said that Abu Bakr and his army became the examples of this verse! they didn't said that the verse revealed on the caliphate of Abu Bakr! 😐...
@chingpong72185 жыл бұрын
JazakAllah
@Iboom1511 ай бұрын
Allahuakbar
@hamzaa6962 жыл бұрын
Yeah .. Keep defending !!!
@meesamz7919 Жыл бұрын
PLEASE YOU WERE SO CLOSE The verse you shows (5:54) is as you said foretelling the leadership of one after the prophet whom allah is dear to, who is humble to the muslims, stern to infidels and fights in the way of allah. THE VERY NEXT AYAH TELLS YOU WHO THAT IS 5:55 "Your only guardians (wali) are Allah, His Messenger, and those who establish prayer and pay alms-tax while boing (ruku)."
@iMan-610 Жыл бұрын
5:55 speaks in PLURAL,doesnt speak about a Particular person,
@meesamz7919 Жыл бұрын
@@iMan-610 many verses address in plural while addressing only one person/being. countless have been attributed to allah and muhammad. using plural to address one person is a matter of honorary status in some cases, namely the case of 5:55. if you can find any other who has given charity during the ruku of salah then my case is disproven
@amirulafiq43715 жыл бұрын
Assalamualaikum can someone help address this hadith : Mujahid said: 'I was walking with ibn Umar in a slave market, then we saw some slave dealers gathered around one slave-girl and they were kissing her, when they saw ibn Umar, they stopped and said: 'Ibn Umar has arrived'. Then ibn Umar came closer to the slave-girl, he touched some parts of her body and then said: 'Who is the master of this slave-girl, she is just a commodity!' Musanaf ibn Abi Shayba, Volume 4 page 289 Tradition 20240 Did the slave-dealers publicly kissed the slave-girl who was not theirs and why didn't ibn Umar rebuke them for it?
@TheSlaveOfAllah19925 жыл бұрын
Whenever he (Ali) intended to buy a jariya, he used to uncover her legs and look at them. And this report is declared reliable by grand Ayatullah Abu al-Qasim al-Khui in Kitab -Nikah The issue of slavery is a sensitive one. Pretty disgusting what they did.
@thestealth24485 жыл бұрын
Amirul Afiq maybe ask on r/islam? Although if you don’t have enough karma then you would need to message the mods
@amirulafiq43715 жыл бұрын
I've already asked at islamstackexchange. Still waiting for the response
@noorassunnah68515 жыл бұрын
Amirul Afiq refer this response : www.twelvershia.net/2014/10/11/response-to-ibn-umar-buying-slave-girl/
@amirulafiq43715 жыл бұрын
@@noorassunnah6851 assalamualaikum I've already read that article thank u. However even if we were to accept that explanation what happened to the concept of awrah and modesty? Not only was she inspected she was also kissed. From my research I've learnt that only the owner of the slave-girl can touch her. Shouldn't there be a restriction? This hadith gives the impression that there is no awrah for the slave-girl in front of any man before and after being bought. If she can be touched, inspected and kissed before being bought who's to say that others beside the master can't touch her after being bought. If there was no restriction before buying her how can it make sense that there is after buying her? It's like saying you can let someone touch and inspect your daughter without him marrying her first and foremost. Only after marriage that it is restricted to one man for her to be touched. Does that make sense? Of course this is nonsensical and sinful. We're not allowed to touch any woman that is non-mahram except when one marries her. No one else who didn't get to marry her is allowed to touch her after that. The same can be said about the slave-girl. You're not allowed to touch her unless you own her. There are hadiths that condemn adultery perpetrated by and towards slaves so that means there's a restriction i.e only the master can have relations with her right? Doesn't that mean there is awrah between her and others besides her master. But how can there is no restriction or awrah before buying her? (refer back to the daughter example)
@thestealth24485 жыл бұрын
7:08 😂😂
@Anarchist3692 жыл бұрын
😆
@007VitaminD5 жыл бұрын
2019 Muslims BTW luul. When the classical scholars dont have proof for Abu Bakr in the Quran, we have new bidah groups forming simply for the sake of polemics and debate, not even in their authentic teachings. Lets admit, this video is only a retaliation of the fact he is not in the Quran and others point this out, so its done for debate, not done because its part of your school.
@mosaad68645 жыл бұрын
This end of time different people from arabs persians. Has nothing to do with what you are saying.
@bcomacca49274 жыл бұрын
What was the your historians MUSLIM and BUKHARI? Were the Arabs?
@reyfarce56975 жыл бұрын
MashAllah brother but I have a question for you.... Was Malik ibn Nuweira an apostate or a Muslim? Because what I heard is that he was a Muslim and Abu Bakr (ra) ordered khalid bin walid to confront him and the latter killed him and married his wife on the same night and despite the consensus of the umma including umar ibn khattab (ra) to punish khalid, Abu bakr(ra) forgave him saying he did ijtehad. Another question is that if Ash'ath bin Qays was an apostate then why did Abu bakr(ra) forgive him later and gave his sister in marriage to him?
@noorassunnah68515 жыл бұрын
REY FORCE Malik bin Nuweira was an apostate. And he had divorced his wife, but kept her in captivity. What you heard is Shiee propaganda.
@islamislife54603 жыл бұрын
By rejecting the beliefs of rawafiz (shia) you are doing the same thing!!!
@last_protocol5 жыл бұрын
Why you people are trying to force abu bakar’s-and rest of the two-caliphate upon Muslims which whatsoever is not clearly mentioned in Quran and Hadith.
@zaynsiddiqui9025 жыл бұрын
In Hadith it is mentioned clearly. BTW why you force your 12 imams over Muslims which is clearly a lie and fraud which whatsoever doesn't exist in Quran and hadiths.
@last_protocol5 жыл бұрын
Zayn Siddiqui Hadith Thaqalain is mutawatir hadith with 39 different chains in sunni books mentioned in your most prominent books i.e Bukhari Muslim and so on. And you people hide it from innocent Muslims by preaching them with wrong version of the Hadith Thaqalain. If you have an inkling of hadith which justifies the caliphate of umar bakar and uthman plz give me.
@imranahmed15425 жыл бұрын
@@last_protocol pls give us the correct version of the hadith as you have said
@zaynsiddiqui9025 жыл бұрын
@@last_protocol can u show me your 12 imams in Hadith thaqalain ? Let's see
@noorassunnah68515 жыл бұрын
Art Lake Which Sunni says he doesn’t believe in thaqalayn ? AFAIK Sunnis believe in authentic version of thaqalayn hadeeth. And how could a Sunni hide it , when you yourself admit that it’s in Sunni books ? Try to be rational. And the video here proves the Sunni position and weakens Shiite position using Quranic verse. Seems you can’t swallow it.
@KolkataGamingBoys10 ай бұрын
Website baaz lanati 😂
@ReNaq3135 жыл бұрын
If you look closely in to the ayah you'll know that's saqeefa and they were distributing powers among themselves.Atleast forge some valid events and sahee hadeeths and direct conclusions to your points to counter ghadeer and IMAM ALI a.s wilayah.wishing you luck to fabricate something Good next time👍👍.
@larcm35 жыл бұрын
All lies by Sunnies
@GemsAndBenefits5 жыл бұрын
Show which are the lies then. Fine, all Shias lie in their videos. Why? Well, just because I said so of course 🤣
@iddydawood20205 жыл бұрын
misinterpretations of Qur'an from sunni.sunni are always lies
@GemsAndBenefits5 жыл бұрын
@@iddydawood2020 You're funny. Have you read Shi'i tafasīr 🤣 they'll derive evidence for their Imāmah concept from the first ayah of Surah Fātihah 🤣 The Sunni, the true Sunni, uses explicit evidences to establish his foundations. The Shi'i clings onto what is ambiguous. That is the difference between you & I 🙃
@GemsAndBenefits5 жыл бұрын
@@iddydawood2020 Allāh ﷻ says: ٱلْخَبِيثَٰتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَٱلْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَٰتِ ۖ وَٱلطَّيِّبَٰتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَٱلطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَٰتِ "Corrupt women are for corrupt men, and corrupt men are for corrupt women, and good women are for good men, and good men are for good women." - [Surah an-Noor 24:26] From this ayah, we can understand that 'Ā'ishah رضي الله عنها was a good, noble, virtuous woman. Why? Because she was married to a good man, rather the best of men - Muhammad ﷺ. And good men are only for good women. *Allah would never give her in marriage to our Prophet ﷺ had she been a corrupt woman.* But according to your scholars, our Mother 'Aishā رضي الله عنها was an adulterer, and a corrupt women (may Allah elevate her ranks above what they claim of her, free is she from such falsehood) and by extension are claiming the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was also a corrupt man. Why? Because corrupt women are for corrupt men. 🤷♂️ That's one example. Trust me, there are loads. P.S: See how instead of just hurling insults & ad hominems I actually addressed your claim, and presented some actual reasoning to back up what I'm saying? Try it someday 🙃🙃🙃😂
@maryammuslimah76605 жыл бұрын
G ks why would you even believe in Quran when Holy Quran was compiled by othman bin Affan