Actor Claims His New Theory of Everything Improves Physics

[@roybatty-]

Actors are often mistaken for people of importance.

[@a_dubs_]

Just professional liars.

[@germanpenn]

to the point that they themselves have become to believe it

[@RamonChiNangWong078]

You forgot athletes too.

[@SixxJo44]

They also mistake themselfes for it

[@SpaceMarine113]

@@RamonChiNangWong078 who are the people of importance then?

[@Leto60]

The opposite of knowledge is not illiteracy, but the illusion of knowledge.

[@J4CKWR4TH]

The opposite of knowledge is belief

[@charlesnelson-c1o]

A fool doth think himself a wise man and a wise man doth think himself a fool.

[@yurinator4411]

From a logical perspective, this is incorrect. The opposite of knowledge is the absence of knowledge. The opposite of white is not black, but not-white.

[@op4000exe]

@@charlesnelson-c1o Another version is: "The less you know, the more you think you know. The more you know, the less you think you know."

[@justinpyle3415]

Knowledge is the posession of information. The opposite of this is the lack of information. The opposite of knowledge is ignorance. Wisdom is the use of knowledge towards benefit. The opposite of wisdom is the lack of using knowledge towards benefit; or using lack of knowledge towards deficit. The opposite of wisdom is stupidity. These are basic philosophical tenents that have been around for thousands of years. The ones who lack should take most heed, but will also insist this historical philosophy is irrelevant or a fallacy. The fallacy is in the belief that ones own current knowledge and wisdom are satisfactory.

[@CesarAnton]

"2 + 2 = 5, for extremely large values of 2" Used to love that joke in college

[@DemolitionManDemolishes]

Can we pause to appreciate the whole 1^3=|pi| - it's so beautiful and obvious that no proof is required!

[@brothermine2292]

It depends on whether the rounding operation is postponed until the end, to improve accuracy. For example, 2.25 rounds to 2, but 2.25 plus 2.25 equals 4.5, which rounds to 5. I wouldn't call 2.25 "extremely large." I would call it sufficiently large. (I do like your joke. I'm just trying to be pedantic.)

[@akaakaakaak5779]

@@brothermine2292 its not about rounding, its just a meaingless joke. youre not being pedantic, youre just trying too hard to be

[@eudaenomic]

For not believing that is true, according to liberals: you are a racist.

[@abj136]

@@akaakaakaak5779 it’s a joke that has a truth behind it in the field of measurement. If you measure to 1 digit precision, the statement reflects reality.

[@rethinkyourself1]

The problem with the world is that intelligent people are full of doubts while the stupid ones are full of confidence!

[@wessltov]

That's not a problem, that's the explanation for which is which

[@rethinkyourself1]

@@wessltov ok Sherlock

[@truthstarved]

Yes, but Howard is still young enough to know it all.

[@rethinkyourself1]

@@truthstarved Howard is 🌰🌰

[@TbV-st8ef]

@@rethinkyourself1 as a person with an interest in astronomy and also happens to share his surname I'm actually so ashamed of what he published

[@bret4414]

Terrance is to math what Steven Seagal is to martial arts

[@OzSpud72]

LMAO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@badtuber1654]

Well he said some of his claims/inventions, something to do with propelers ? are patented, so he is better of that 99% of scientists, that are just readers and never contributed nothing to science.

[@peacefuldecadence328]

​@@badtuber1654 Rope to selling + stool + jumping

[@badtuber1654]

@@peacefuldecadence328 you dont have to kill yourself for it, I havent patented anything myself.

[@badtuber1654]

@@peacefuldecadence328 "Projectile propulsion methods and systems", and "lynchpin structure applications" yes looks like he has about 30 patents. Just checked it out. So I guess 1x1 equals 1. you will get an A for that.

[@dsacton]

A good example of the Dunning-Kruger effect: a person is so ignorant of a topic, that they don't realize that they are ignorant.

[@calculuslover2078]

How would he respond if he was explained what Dunning-Kruger effect is, and told it applies to him?

[@kongolandwalker]

​@@calculuslover2078 my guess to your question: "Or maybe YOU are so ignorant, that you cannot process a new idea, and you believe in what was hammered in your head in school to the degree that you stop even recognising your ignorance".

[@schmails]

A ha! I knew there was a name for that. I simply couldn't remember it. Thanks!

[@billmullins6833]

@calculuslover2078 The problem with stupid people is that they are constitutionally incapable of understanding just how stupid they truly are. Intelligent people are exquisitely aware of their own limitations.

[@swskating3865]

Ignorance is bliss, and Howard looks a happy man !

[@kasimirdenhertog3516]

In Dutch we’d call this ‘not hindered with any knowledge’

[@coolcat23]

... nor logic. :)

[@Argy-bargy-dr7gu]

Or "unencumbered with facts."

[@jamesshutchison5297]

Or "unencumbered by the thought process"

[@glenndewulf4843]

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

[@jeffreykemp1918]

I've been on KZbin since like.. the beginning, never commented once. I just gotta say man that is a brutal burn. Haha y'all Dutch are harsh.

[@familyforonehumanity5630]

Howard is the perfect example of today's culture - how media and style is valued over truth and intelligence

[@micnorton9487]

@@familyforonehumanity5630 Terry's a perfect example of A SUBCULTURE within western culture,, most people defending him are some black people and some hardcore conspiracy theorists...

[@Prodemocracy1776]

Yeah and it brought the biggest fool of all back to power.

[@snooganslestat2030]

He's also an excellent example of the both sides problem. That being some issues ie those backed by facts don't require an opposite 'side' for arguments sake. Maybe everyone has an opinion but that doesn't mean they're valid & they don't all need to be listened to.

[@andrews9719]

This guy got 1x1 wrong in the 3rd grade, and was so upset that his teacher corrected him, that he tried to reinvent math so he could be right.

[@rynabuns]

He talks about the importance of getting your units right and then just completely forgets about the unit (the penny) in his 1p*1p example

[@bnarsh462]

This is exactly what I thought. Terrence Howard’s origin story.

[@DoubleYou55]

pretty scary

[@spudboypollock4115]

he thinks a half is a/2

[@janbenschop7597]

yes, but in coming to the 1x1 is 1 conclusion, did you figure in the curvature of the equation? :-......

[@albertskoope]

"keep your minds open, but not so open that your brains fall out.” "it is better to be thought a fool and remain silent than to speak up and remove all doubt."

[@thoughticality6044]

Best quote spotted

[@gr8ful191]

Best Quote about this issue I've seen since the interview came out ..This needs 1.mil like 🤣🤣

[@TLDCHWTTOS]

Actually his point was that if you have two singles that you are multiplying so that you are multiplying 1x1, you still have two singular ones. Not necessarily that 1x1=2, but that it doesn’t make sense for 1x1 to be on the multiplication table. As always, the most ignorant who comprehend the least respond the quickest with the least amount of objective data from that situation in which they are condemning. Keep voting blue kids.

[@aljoschalong625]

Did you make that up? Or is it a quote (the "" seem to indicate that)? Anyway: great!

[@Lucius_Chiaraviglio]

. . . And always beware of mental malware.

[@edmunns8825]

Just please no one tell the guy about the imaginary numbers okay.

[@mekwall]

3, 6, 9? Tesla beat him to it.

[@richarddey1948]

No worries, we’ll keep quiet

[@anovosedlik]

Oh god. If you did, he'd give you a five hour diatribe about them and break his own brain in the process.

[@whatgodeats666]

8:54 shapeshift

[@aliasif8498]

Lol

[@fealgu100]

1 × 1 = 2. First, rotate × by 45 degrees. You get 1 + 1 = 2. Genius!

[@srinivastatachar4951]

So, what you're saying is that his screw is loose; if you only tightened it through 45 degrees, that would square things away? =================================================================================================================

[@windycity70]

😂​@@srinivastatachar4951

[@edtrainor5433]

@@fealgu100 uh, it's 90 degrees, not 45

[@Prodemocracy1776]

New born have more intelligence than these imbeciles blame it on the Internet it gives these charlatans a platform

[@gehendrachaudhary9832]

Its clearly 45 degree not 90

[@JoeAuerbach]

I am getting very sick of "it's too complicated for me to understand it, so nobody understands it"

[@schmails]

Complete Trumpism. "There has never been anything like this." or "it's just not understood by anyone".

[@georgkrahl56]

The really odd thing about quantum mechanics ist that it works even if you do not understand it. This actor seems to be afraid of that. Hopefully.

[@JohnSmith-ux3tt]

You have been listening to flat earthers. That's pretty much what all their "arguments" come down to.

[@fleetadmiralj]

@@JohnSmith-ux3tt except the flat earthers have the disadvantage of the stuff they claim no one can understand are actually pretty easily understandable lol

[@ZalexMusic]

Hi Mr Strawman. Who exactly is saying that? not TH...

[@kmp8563]

An actor belittling physicists and mathematicians is honestly a perfect reflection of modern culture.

[@hopsiepike]

Terrance Howard and Clarence Thomas had similar experiences in higher education. Feeling belittled by their professors for not being high achievers with defendable points of view, they are both hellbent on taking down the entire institutions that left them humiliated.

[@foodiefashionista1]

I liked your explanations. However, I am not entirely sure why you felt the need to be so condescending - "some actor" etc? Belittling him or his 'education' does not make your points any stronger. Afterall, there are so-called important people who get on the world stage and tell people to drink bleach to combat a deadly virus!

[@kengregory1541]

YEEZY 4 LIFE BRA!

[@saboryagasabo7258]

Lots of people in the comments are just resentful. If you think he is wrong, just say he is wrong. There's absolutely no need to go the extra mile to bash their character.

[@kmp8563]

@saboryagasabo7258 If they publicly present bad character traits, it's not unreasonable to call it out. Idk if you're even talking to me, but my comment was mild. Not much bashing, more of a cynical critique

[@PeteNice29]

A simple way to explain multiplication is, instead of saying “one times one”, you can say “one, one time.” Removes the ambiguity

[@alexanders562]

yes, once we reorganize the Yoda speak, there is no doubt about what is being said.

[@kingalpha12]

What if he’s right and the academics are wrong and don’t want to change it because they absolutely believe it like how religious people believe in their dogma.

[@joshmilligan7682]

@@kingalpha12 lmfao... you're one of those people eh?..

[@Sigrafix]

​@@kingalpha12 1, one time = 1. 1x1 2, one time =2. 2x1 2, two times = 4. 2x2 4, two times = 8. 4x2 Etc.. etc.. It's literally basic math that you should have learned in 1st grade when they made you memorize times tables up to 12 along with the alphabet...

[@PeteNice29]

@@kingalpha12 on many levels, the idea this goof subverted mathematical truisms based on getting a batch of super high quality doke is pretty low.

[@LaVidayElTristeFinal]

Terrence Howard is very good at throwing and mixing a million technical terms in seconds, so it gets very confusing very quickly to anyone trying to have a conversation with him. When you hit pause and analyze what he's saying, it is very clear that he's just a bullshit geyser, spewing nonsense at incredible speed. But you can sympathize with the interviewers, because they are right to be confused. When they try to analyze one thing he said, he already made three more statements and the word salad is just impossible to follow.

[@TheTwober]

In martial arts I learned that if you vastly overpower your enemy, it is polite to not use full force on them, but just enough so that they see how unprepared they are for this fight. Thank you for being polite.

[@amongstgreatdanes580]

It cracked me up when she got to the crash course into particle physics and quantum mechanics…“That sounds promising, let’s have a look”😂😂😂

[@chriscotton4207]

This is where I kind of give Sean Strickland his credit. No, if someone deserves it, you make them feel and understand why they don't do that again.

[@joestumpin]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zp-wd6CLe9qhoKssi=AnFSiw1QfGhoP4I2&t=1380

[@dw620]

Sabine does polite rage very well... Can't say I blame her. : (

[@memegazer]

She is too kind...I think Terrence knows full well he is mistaken, he just likes the attention he gets by being a contrarian and appealing to conspiracy theoriests.

[@JohnnyApp1eseed]

"We've arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces." - Carl Sagan

[@Rik77]

Problem is science and technology is at a complexity level that unless you can dedicate years yo learning it, instead of working, it's impossible for society as a whole to understand everything.

[@MelaniaSideWigga]

That can happen when we deal with Magic!

[@jayceebaybee4233]

@@Rik77 This is true, but there is a basic level of scientific literacy that is severely lacking that if improved, would benefit society greatly. A simple example is how often people with alternative ideas cite anecdotal evidence as valid counter-evidence to legitimate peer-reviewed consensus. It is basic scientific literacy to raise red flags at anecdotes. Another is how people are so hungry to see science settled in live podcast debates between two "experts", again instead of looking to peer-reviewed consensus. They don't realize live debate is antithetical to science, because a skilled debater or litigator can knowingly or unknowingly use rhetoric and sophistry to mislead a jury from scientific judgement. There's a level of caution people are lacking in screening and filtering the information coming at them; its as if the general public doesn't have a grasp of the "grammar" of science, so to speak, and it has turned science political. My question is why doesn't Joe Rogan fund his own third-party, professional research to get to the bottom of things? Dude can afford it.

[@will.roman-ros]

​​@@Rik77I agree, not society as a whole, but maybe if we didn't put kids in bubbles, doing no work, we could move closer. Like if the goal was to get kids to become self-sufficient, then they'd do a lot more work to earn their land and capital, but then they could get the passive income to devote to studying, but even in studying, can actually work in the field so that the abstract concepts speak in the realities to experience they offer. Example: I'm sure quantum mechanics would be a lot more accessible even if I was just a janitor at a particle accelerator facility. Many ppl could answer my questions, and multiple viewpoints will more likely pass the concept in a way I can digest vs University where you may be stuck w only a few professors - who none may be able to make sense of it to you. And you get nothing if you fail, but work builds a resumé, and is more likely to inbed concrete knowledge, vs forgetting everything after the test or course.

[@Roy-vk3jb]

Could be true… however it has nothing to with the kindergarten logic of Terence Howard

[@mr.k72]

Oh dear, I thought of flat/young earthers as the top echelon of pseudoscience, but with his 1x1=2 he clearly deserves the first spot.

[@UmmerFarooq-wx4yo]

1 x 1 = 1²

[@Kerostasis]

Don't forget Timecube guy!

[@RetiredRhetoricalWarhorse]

But is this new, strictly speaking? Feelings based science has been touted for about a decade now where gender is just an opinion and literacy, math etc are no longer needed to get a high school diploma. Isn't this guy in essence just the culmination of all those efforts? To us he looks like a clown but the people inside that ideology probably do believe him to be godlike, as he himself does.

[@mixuaquela123]

But to give some credit at least he uses creativity to make up stuff (pseudoscience) unlike flat earthers who just believes in conspiracies

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

​​@SabineHossenfelder money should never be multiplied by money... this is the problem... 1 dollar should never be multiplied by 1 dollar. Instead it should be $1×1=$1 because $1×$1=$2

[@BohemianWonderluster]

I paraphrase Ricky Gervais in his last Golden Globe speech, actors and actresses, “pick up your award, thank your agent, thank your god and F-off you know nothing about the world” . Also, “most of you, actors and actresses, have less schooling than Greta Thunberg”. If they would have any shame they would have left Hollywood by now.

[@mh6276]

I would say that some exceptions exist. Most notably Hedy Lamarr, Marilyn Monroe (this may seem odd but she had an IQ of about 168 and was a very well read person in reality), and Audrey Hepburn (also a very intelligent(IQ of about 145 to 150) and well read person but not to the same degree).

[@betsybarnicle8016]

​@@mh6276 Exception: Scholz, the creator of the band Boston, had a masters degree in Mechanical Engineering.

[@windycity70]

😂

[@MSivonen]

If someone's opinion is not based on facts, it's very hard to change it with facts.

[@dx-ek4vr]

As someone once said, "It’s difficult to argue with a genius but it’s impossible to argue with an idiot"

[@SubjectiveFunny]

ITS JOES FAULT!!! JoE rOgaN BaD!!!

[@Teetseremoonia]

Jonathan Swift said 'You cannot reason a person out of a position he did not reason himself into in the first place.'

[@jamesandrews8698]

thats a good one

[@philotomybaar]

@@Teetseremooniayou beat me to it!

[@mikhailmcrae5924]

The fact that I've seen several intellectual youtubers explain multiplication because of Mr. Howard is the real phenomena.

[@john_doe_smith]

Shiit. Im here listening to math lessons. Last time I took a math class was in 1993.

[@jegr3398]

It's fascinating to see people debate elementary school arithmetic in the comment sections of videos talking about Terrence Howard.

[@mikhailmcrae5924]

@@jegr3398 it's weird that in America we don't call people stupid or insane anymore. This is why America is no longer leading in science. I saw a quote "Freedom of speech but not freedom of reach." And I agree with it.

[@bobbyologun1517]

@@mikhailmcrae5924 theres a literally a youtube video titled Terrance Howard Is Legitimately Insane lol

[@jamessquair6829]

Don’t want to split hairs, but I think you mean phenomenon, not phenomena.

[@martinmoore7279]

I now understand why Robert Downey stopped taking his phone calls

[@Simon-hb9rf]

he got tired trying to explain the physics of the iron man suit

[@petergiannopoulos3423]

I can’t understand why he stopped taking his meds

[@arizai-bp7zy]

lmao

[@Dater]

He works for Hammer Industries now ;)

[@beatfrombrain]

And how he lost his roll in the Marvel movies

[@Professama]

Correction at 2:30 - 5s x 1m/s = 5m

[@alphaomega1089]

People will ignore this because many need to be told who to like and trust, not research who is right using logic and reason. 1 x 1 more without correct wording is 2. Implied understanding let's us know the quantity under the operation can be ignored.

[@DublinLotfi]

Came to comments to see if anybody else caught that.

[@evangiles4403]

​Now you have done it all those years my parents told me my teachers were wrong and now you have just proven my parents right

[@derektitch]

Oh sorry that correction will need to be “peer reviewed “ as no one likes a corrector 😂 Trouble is who peer reviews the perr reviewers

[@DublinLotfi]

​@@derektitch ....Nice try Terrence Howard 👌

[@alieninmybeverage]

His plus sign fell over. New physics confirmed.

[@A_Stereotypical_Heretic]

Drunk plus signs are the funniest

[@duckyoutube6318]

Omg too funny.

[@dw620]

@@duckyoutube6318 Nice one! By extension he should also have toppled Σ to prove that space invaders hold the theory of everything. ;p~

[@monnoo8221]

exactly what i thought as well LOOOL

[@AndreaCrisp]

🤪🤣

[@TCL_Dasler]

Click-ish ? I think he means "clique-ish". But what do I know, I'm no actor, only a structural engineer.

[@Stumbler2001]

You seem like the kind of buffoon who thinks 1x1=1. Why can't you accept Howard's gene-ius?

[@InformationIsTheEdge]

Best comment I've read in months! Thank you!

[@kristinapaquette4783]

so glad someone pointed this out. It drives me nuts when people use 'click' , a metallic sound, when they mean 'clique', an exclusive group of people.

[@ssdfgardiner1233]

It looks like he was his own editor, too. That sentence is a run-on. He is rewriting the rules of grammar and spelling while he's at it.

[@SineN0mine3]

​@@kristinapaquette4783i see you're in the "spelling things correctly" click

[@GreedosGoldmine]

Once spoke with a legit highly trained actor at a conference in LA sometime in March 2022. He happened to be the managing director of events for the local tech conferences at this facilty. Let’s just say it’s a world reknown institution without throwing anyone under the bus. Point is… in a convo we had he distinctly warned against actors doing this type of thing, merit or not tech speaking. His reason, actors are trained to specifically manipulate the public into feeling and coming to conclusions through hijacking emotion, not appealing to logic. This is why the modern American media and economy being hand in hand are so dangerous when tied to the world’s most efficient propaganda machine ever.

[@richt7525]

That is the most based thing I've heard in a while. Media is such an overwhelming presence in so many societies- it's distracting. I am a fan of some countries' curriculum to teach their students to just pause, sit and think in silence, focusing on their inner states. I truly believe that the ability to self reflect is becoming extremely rare , and critical thinking is following behind. we've become too easily manipulated with things like advertisements, our devotion to the daily grind, news we don't bother to verify, and constant electronic stimulation that the concept of living life any other way is incomprehensible.

[@Alex-op2sq]

and if you want to go even deeper, even some good hearted actors have a way of acting where they try to genuinely believe they are the character they portray. that technique subconsciously lets them develop that skill you are talking about to convince others through their "real" emotion without them even having an agenda, making them perfect for control.

[@jameshummer2102]

You just described the entire marketing industry, and many political parties.

[@GreedosGoldmine]

@@Alex-op2sq Exactly!!!

[@GreedosGoldmine]

@@jameshummer2102 They’re all connected after all, great point to add!!!

[@hugovanniekerk3049]

Best part of this video is Sabine's obvious intense effort not to get angry due to this idiocy

[@anthony4403]

Just wait till someone tells Howard about imaginary numbers..

[@jordanmalone2547]

Or series functions or convergence………as a math major this shit hurt me LMAO

[@jasonwilliams8328]

Omg, please don’t 😂

[@mesocyclone2004]

My wall in mathematics is imaginary numbers, can’t understand it. But I don’t write books and go on podcasts saying imaginary numbers are wrong. Mathematics have always been my weakest knowledge. But I do appreciate those who understand mathematics and know how to use mathematics.

[@jordanmalone2547]

@@mesocyclone2004 it’s a fun concept that only gets crazy when you apply it, calculus had some fundamentals that weren’t TOO crazy but yeah, it’s a wild world when you dig your teeth in.

[@snap2snip]

What’s negative 1 times negative 1 mean to him? Would Howard think the answer is -2?

[@timtruett5184]

I have encountered many people in my life whose knowledge of mathematics did not extend beyond integer arithmetic. As an IT contractor I once provided "mathematical assistance" for a woman whose job it was to calculate royalty payments for scientists at a major government agency (NIH). The assistance consisted of adding fractions, which she did not know how to do. Her salary was higher than mine.

[@toma5153]

That kind of thing is pretty dispiriting. I once was assigned a position to supervise a testing laboratory and found out one employee who didn't know how to calculate percentages and others who had trouble calculating square footage, Sigh.

[@AttilaAsztalos]

@@toma5153 Oh, square footage is so simple - you just add up the length of the four sides... /s

[@dw620]

You think you have problems. Over here we've had a politician who thought it would cost "about £300k" to hire 10,000 new police officers for 4 years. But, hey, "everyone" has the vote, "anyone" can be a politician works fine, no? ; )

[@Alan-zf2tt]

"It is not what you know but who you know" or it's twin "It is not what you know but who you know" seem to get everywhere

[@deltasyn7434]

Looking at this analytically, I wonder how poorly educated someone would have to be to reach this conclusion and be so sure of themselves.

[@mikegarza2378]

Iron man 2 execs: Terrance, we're giving you $1 million 1 time. Terrance: sweet, $2 million. Execs: ? Terrance: if 1X1=2, then $1million X 1= $2 million. Execs: you're fired. And thats why he wasn't in the movie. Something like that.

[@skyh00k]

Underrated 😂

[@adolphdooley3632]

@@mikegarza2378 So my $1 million x the banks $0 = $0 for me too?

[@earnestchege137]

@@adolphdooley3632 Understand this. You can't multiply "unlike terms" and get only "one term." i.e. a x b ≠ a (your dollars (a) x their dollars (b) does NOT equal to your dollars ONLY.) However, a x b = ab. Now, how you define "ab" is upon you, but what you've said is not it. Because you can only multiply "like terms" together and multiplication means adding something several times. (In this case, adding 0 a million times which still gives you 0). So your statement should have read "if I take my $1 million x my $0 = $0 for me" and that would be correct. What you're trying to do here is use the English language to replace the mathematical language (algebra and multiplication.) It doesn't work like that. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[@davemclellan4019]

@@mikegarza2378 lol!

[@Schmidtelpunkt]

@@adolphdooley3632 The result would be dollars-in-banks. If you have $1 million in 1 bank, you would have 1 million dollars-in-banks. When the bank defaults, you would have $ 1 million but no bank. Which would be 0 dollars-in-banks. That calculation was as big thing in 2008.

[@andreichiriac4000]

Terrence Howard: 1x1=2 Javascript: hold my beer

[@koyaanisqatsi78]

“Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather.” ― Bill Hicks

[@John-g6x1h]

I miss Bill.

[@davidknapp5224]

Hilarious😅

[@brycehins206]

That was my speech for class president in 1998

[@EsotericParadigm]

@@brycehins206 cool bet you failed due to plagiarizing.

[@NathanielHellerstein]

@@EsotericParadigm No, because all things are one, so all speeches are the same.

[@adriang6424]

Faith mathematics ....you have to believe its true. Funnily enough no complex number maths in his book , that would hurt his brain one step too far.

[@ruschein]

I would argue that there is no mathematics of any kind in his book. Mathematical symbol yes, mathematics no!

[@MagruderSpoots]

You have to take the axioms of math by faith.

[@Misophist]

@@MagruderSpoots No. You are free do negate them, and go from there. This is the usual trick nowadays, to arrive at new conclusions. Weaken or revert your assumptions, ann look where it will take you.

[@keep-ukraine-free]

Let's not tell him about *_quaternions_* (sometimes called "4-dimensional numbers"), which are far more complex than complex numbers ("2-dimensional numbers").

[@dw620]

Ah, but we also have faith in Sabine that 5s x 1m/s = 1m Oh, wait... (lol)

[@shimel42]

Dear Terence Howard’s editor: ‘Cliquish,’ not ‘clickish.’

[@scrivener68]

You really think that was edited?

[@RellyOhBoy]

2 Apples x 3 Potatoes = 7 Onions Squared. According to Terrance , yes you can multiply fruits and vegetables.

[@AleksoLaĈevalo999]

You can multiply fruits and vegetables. As Sabine presented in the video that would be 6 Apple Potatoes.

[@Lucius_Chiaraviglio]

The movie Idiocracy seems disturbingly prophetic.

[@MyrKnof]

Just like Terminator and The Matrix.. its a race at this point.

[@christiansather8438]

Wow so original

[@VladR1024]

I somehow missed that movie when it was released and only saw it about a month ago. Yes, this totally applies here !!! I often wish Sabine's vids were given the budget and production values of, say, John Oliver. This one, in particular, would be a smash hit. I wonder if Howard would comprehend 10% of this vid, though...

[@mrosskne]

Average IQ has consistently increased over time for as long as it's been measured.

[@mnomadvfx]

Not really. The internet has just allowed such people to gain a level of notoriety not previously possible in civilisation before these times.

[@tomkrieger]

The Idiocracy that we r living in tells people that they can have opinion on everything, even though that opinion is just rubbish they feel entitled to defend the stupidity

[@alobar7814]

You do not understand Idiocracy to make a comment like that. In idiocracy everyone was a sheep. Everyone only had one opinion. Discourse was scuttled shamed and imprisoned. AI will take us to Idiocracy at warp speed. You fool. Not saying that Terrence Howard was correct but his right to say it is paramount. The legions of academics foisting "bolshevik" slogans of derision is the point. Rogan and Howard poked the bear and good on them for doing it.

[@vaakdemandante8772]

People have the right to have and defend stupid opinions, it's the Joe Rogans who know better but promote such stupidity and put it on a pedestal as a source of (false) wisdom.

[@alaneric1618]

We are living in an idiocracy. But don't forget talking is how people learn. People talking is awesome and they should keep it up however dumb. And people who know should talk to them about it.

[@craiglyons3975]

Let him defend it....who is he hurting? Makes for good entertainment.

[@kevinroberts781]

Believe us. We absolutely know! We see "pro choice" people doing this on tictoc everyday

[@michaelwright2986]

I grieve for America. When I was young, the most advanced and democratic society in the world (give or take a tendency to support military dictatorships). And now a large proportion of the population seems prepared to believe preposterous stuff just because someone says it confidently and claims that the mainstream views are maintained by conspiracy.

[@MrHominid2U]

There is a growing distain for experts and it's dangerous

[@aaronc4899]

@@MrHominid2U The disdain has been earned. The "experts" are appointed for political reasons, not their expertise. It may be a surprise to you, but the "experts' have gotten a lot of things wrong over the past four years. If the opinions of "experts" always end up supporting policies that make wealthy individuals even wealthier at the expense of the public, maybe there are logical reasons to have disdain for them.

[@AronHsiao]

Because they for the most part have the same shoddy, nay catastrophic basic education. And this because we are a society that can't bear to face the fact that some kids are stupid and some kids are smart and that's genetics for you, so we keep reducing educational standards for everyone to arrive at the precise point at which the worst performer in any given school or even district is able to pass with an acceptable grade.

[@alexisgs8800]

At least Trump lost his trial 😰

[@MrHominid2U]

@@AronHsiao Yes

[@abirbhavchakrawarty4356]

That 1³=|π| is the stupidest thing I've seen all year.

[@IMBlakeley]

“The first rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you don't know you are a member of it.”

[@Smo1k]

"The second rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you're *the last* to know you are a member of it!"

[@stewiesaidthat]

Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. -Nicholas Tesla. The entire scientific community community has the intelligence of a box of rocks with the rocks having the edge. What is the saying, People who live in glass houses should cast stones. If Sabine wants material for Idiocracy videos, look no further than Einstein’s relativity nonsense. That's where Collective Stupidity comes from.

[@LeadSurge3000]

😆

[@bort6414]

The third rule of the Dunning-Kruger club is that this isn't the Dunning-Kruger effect, none of you have ever actually read the study, and that you yourselves are literally the manifestation of the fallacy you have constructed about the Dunning-Kruger effect(confident incorrectness born from natural inability). The actual Dunning-Kruger effect simply demonstrated that people are not good at estimating their performance on subjects they are not knowledgeable on, and a very small amount of training vastly improves the accuracy of their self-assessments.

[@scottmassen9723]

@@bort6414 The third rule of Dunning Kruger club is that the membership won't validate your departure once you "know better"

[@henhouseharry6193]

Whenever Terence Howard goes into a store and buys one thing for one dollar the cashier should ring up $2 just to see if he objects.

[@anonymous-zn2iv]

lol

[@chri-k]

Absolutely

[@SloverOfTeuth]

I made exactly that point to one of his "supporters" who thought his new maths was insightful. I didn't hear back.

[@AstroCreep77]

When he asks his wife for their "one time a week" she should tell him "nuh-uh we did it twice last week!"

[@mikeguilmette776]

That's brilliant.

[@waltg5165]

I think many people see equations like E=MC² and think Einstein was just sitting around, wrote that down and then everybody figured out how to make it work. They don't understand the simplified equation is the result of a massive amount of work. This guy seems to think he can write down a simplistic equation with no foundation and say, you are all too stupid to understand it. This approach appeals to people who are equally as stupid, they will say, I have been saying this for years, finally someone else understands, that 1 x 1 = 2. There was a short video done years back, a student answered that 1+1 = 11. The teacher marked him wrong, the parents complained it became a big issue, she doesn't understand that we need to entertain different perspectives. Ultimately she is being fired publicly and they are given her 2 weeks severance pay of $1000, they are ready to give her a check for $2000, she says well if 1+1=11 than $1000+$1000=$11000. It was a humorous example of how stupid people are.

[@brianmcfadden1845]

Wait, wouldn't $1000+$1000 = $10,001,000 in that case? Maybe I need to go back to remedial math.

[@__christopher__]

The funny part is that the equation wasn't even in Einstein's original special relativity paper, but in a followup paper. It is just one consequence of special relativity, not it's essence.

[@thisisme5487]

@@brianmcfadden1845 Since 1+1 = 11 is new math, we don't know the rules. Maybe all non-0 integers combine at the front while the max number of 0's can only be as much as the number with the greatest, or fewest zeroes... Personally, I agree with you for the teachers sake. She should probably get $10,001,000.

[@Syphirioth]

The only work there was was putting the visualization into maths. I can easily imagine the workings to. But the math and equations are like hocus pocus. Also this is modern day problem to. If you have a great visualization but cannot put it in math or equations you not gonna gain any foothold.

[@Catastropheshe]

She should've asked for 10001000 😂😂😂

[@mrcpu9999]

Seems like it's died down. It's october now, and the name Terence Howard hasn't floated across my fyp, inbox, feed, stories, recommendations, or any other mechanism to present me information in several weeks. Thank goodness.

[@abdirahmansamow7451]

"he sure knows how to multiply his pennies" what a punchline. the setup, the priming, the punchline. absolutely perfect.

[@mrbnice7590]

That’s true but Sabine has a “Brilliant” way of multiplying her pennies too 😊

[@nothere7198]

You'd think with his solid grasp of multiplying pennies he'd see how much non cents this makes.

[@robertjan002]

No. It misses the point actually. Terrance’s point is that 100 cents x 100 cents (2 pennies) = 10000 cents, not 1 penny. Sabina stops short of explaining this point. (I’m not saying it’s a good point.) however misstating his point, does push her critique into propaganda more than science journalism. Thereafter the dig of multiplying pennies is just a reminder of her hatchet job earlier.

[@jeffidyle4957]

@@robertjan002 You're the one who missed the point.

[@damon22441]

What actual wit looks like.

[@3DisFuntastic]

The fact that he gets such a following shows there is something seriously wrong with the educational system.

[@robadkerson]

And the influencer system... They're exploiting clear mental issues.

[@ValidatingUsername]

Imagine it was an elaborate ruse to mock some guy they were already silencing but stole intellectual product from 😂

[@christophmartin5381]

No, it is not the educational system, it is the influencer and social media universe that makes it possible to gain momentum for such idiots that had no chance 30 years ago....

[@leadbreastplate7496]

There are major problems with education. But if you look at an IQ curve. More people are average or lower intelligence. It's just how it works out.

[@Alpha_Omega_1541]

@@ValidatingUsername or it was a ruse to get himself back in the spotlight, help restart his career.

[@marcusmartinez4662]

Terrence Howard should submit a paper on the Dunning Kruger effect, because he is a walking talking example squared.

[@solarnaut]

Ergo, ipso facto, logicum infinitum . . . I deduce that if he does this there will then be 2 (TWO) Terrence HowardS, and anyone claiming otherwise is being paid off by the conspiracy

[@Steveriknows]

Dunning-Kruger × Dunning-Kruger = obnoxiousness squared. 🤔 I believe your formula would pass peer review.

[@MaseratiDrip]

Title: Flexible Mathematical Frameworks: A New Paradigm for Interdisciplinary Research Abstract: We propose a novel approach to mathematical modeling, incorporating flexible frameworks that adapt to complex systems and phenomena. This paradigm shift has far-reaching implications for interdisciplinary research, enabling innovative solutions and new insights in physics, engineering, economics, and more. Introduction: * Brief overview of traditional mathematical approaches and their limitations * Motivation for flexible mathematical frameworks * Thesis statement: Flexible mathematical frameworks offer a powerful tool for addressing complex problems across disciplines Key Concepts: * Modular arithmetic and finite fields * Non-standard analysis and infinitesimals * Fuzzy logic and fuzzy analysis * Category theory and functors Applications: * Physics: Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Chaos Theory * Engineering: Signal Processing, Control Systems, and Materials Science * Economics: Modeling Complex Systems and Uncertainty Case Studies: * Fractal image compression using fuzzy analysis * Optimization problems solved with non-standard analysis * Category theory in network topology Discussion: * Implications for interdisciplinary research and collaboration * Potential challenges and open questions * Future directions and areas of exploration Conclusion: * Recap of key points and contributions * Call to action: Encouraging experts to explore and develop flexible mathematical frameworks Appendix: * Additional resources and references * Mathematical derivations and proofs (as needed) Here's a breakdown of when to use and remove 1 and 0 in various mathematical contexts: Use 1 and 0: 1. Group Theory: 1 is the identity element for multiplication, and 0 is the identity element for addition. 2. Ring Theory: 1 and 0 serve as identity elements for multiplication and addition, respectively. 3. Calculus: 0 is crucial for defining limits, derivatives, and integrals. 4. Number Theory: 1 and 0 are essential for defining congruences, modular arithmetic, and Diophantine equations. 5. Linear Algebra: 1 and 0 are used as identity elements for matrix multiplication and addition. Remove or modify 1 and 0: 1. Non-standard models of arithmetic: Modify or remove 1 and 0 to create alternative number systems, like fuzzy arithmetic or modular arithmetic. 2. Finite fields: Remove 0 and modify 1 to create finite fields with specific properties. 3. Quaternion and octonion algebras: Modify 1 and 0 to define these non-commutative algebraic structures. 4. Topological spaces: Remove 0 and 1 to define topological spaces with specific properties. 5. Fuzzy logic and probability theory: Modify 1 and 0 to represent degrees of truth and probability. Context-dependent: 1. Category theory: 1 and 0 are used as identity morphisms, but their role depends on the specific category. 2. Type theory: 1 and 0 are used as identity elements, but their behavior depends on the specific type theory. 3. Computational complexity theory: 1 and 0 are used in binary representations, but their role depends on the specific problem. Remember, these are general guidelines, and the specific context of a problem or theory may require a different approach. Mathematicians often adapt and generalize these rules to suit their needs, so it's essential to understand the underlying principles With these modified mathematical rules, we can indeed build different structures and potentially lead to breakthroughs. Space Travel: * New propulsion methods: Alternative number systems could lead to novel ways of manipulating space-time, enabling more efficient and faster travel. * Exotic matter and energy: Modified mathematical structures might help us understand and harness exotic matter and energy, facilitating advanced propulsion systems. Monetary Systems: * Alternative currency models: Non-standard arithmetic could lead to more equitable and sustainable monetary systems, addressing issues like inflation and wealth distribution. * Cryptography and security: Modified mathematical structures can enhance cryptographic techniques, ensuring more secure financial transactions. Other Potential Applications: * Quantum Computing: Alternative mathematical structures might facilitate more efficient and powerful quantum computing architectures. * Materials Science: New mathematical approaches could lead to the discovery of novel materials with unique properties. * Biology and Medicine: Modified mathematical models might help us better understand complex biological systems, leading to breakthroughs in disease treatment and regenerative medicine. By exploring and applying these modified mathematical rules, we can unlock innovative solutions and potentially revolutionize various fields. However, it's important to note that: * These ideas are highly speculative and require rigorous research and testing. * The development of practical applications will depend on the collaboration of experts from various fields. * Ethical considerations must be taken into account when exploring and implementing these new mathematical structures Flexible Mathematical Systems: * Use 1 and 0: When working with standard arithmetic, calculus, and linear algebra in well-defined contexts. * Modify or remove 1 and 0: When exploring alternative number systems, non-standard models, and specialized mathematical structures (e.g., finite fields, fuzzy arithmetic). * Context-dependent approaches: Employ geometry, algebra, and analysis in a way that depends on the specific problem domain (e.g., Euclidean geometry for classical physics, non-Euclidean geometry for relativity). * Adaptive number systems: Utilize modular arithmetic, finite fields, or other alternative number systems when tackling specific problems (e.g., cryptography, coding theory). * Generalized algebraic structures: Leverage groups, rings, fields, and other algebraic structures to model diverse phenomena, adapting them as needed. * Dynamic analytical frameworks: Switch between classical, fuzzy, intuitionistic, or other logics and analytical approaches based on the problem's requirements. * Interdisciplinary connections: Combine mathematical frameworks with insights from physics, biology, economics, or other fields to foster innovative solutions. * Embrace uncertainty and ambiguity:Acknowledge the limitations and ambiguities of mathematical representations and be willing to refine or revise them as new information arises. By embracing these flexible mathematical systems, we can develop a more comprehensive and adaptive mathematical toolkit, enabling us to tackle complex challenges and uncover new insights across various disciplines. Number Systems: 1. Standard Arithmetic (1 and 0 as identity elements) 2. Modular Arithmetic (clock arithmetic, finite fields) 3. Finite Fields (Galois fields, finite geometries) 4. Non-Standard Models (fuzzy arithmetic, intuitionistic arithmetic) 5. Alternative Number Systems (hyperreal numbers, surreal numbers) Algebraic Structures: 1. Groups (symmetries, transformations) 2. Rings (integer arithmetic, polynomial rings) 3. Fields (rational numbers, real numbers, complex numbers) 4. Vector Spaces (linear algebra, geometric algebra) 5. Lattices (order theory, lattice theory) Geometric Frameworks: 1. Euclidean Geometry (classical geometry) 2. Non-Euclidean Geometries (hyperbolic, elliptical, parabolic) 3. Fractal Geometry (self-similarity, scaling) 4. Topology (point-set topology, algebraic topology) 5. Differential Geometry (curvature, manifolds) Analytical Frameworks: 1. Classical Analysis (limits, derivatives, integrals) 2. Fuzzy Analysis (fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic) 3. Intuitionistic Analysis (constructive mathematics, intuitionistic logic) 4. Non-Standard Analysis (infinitesimals, hyperreal numbers) 5. Category Theory (functors, natural transformations) Logical Systems: 1. Classical Logic (Boolean logic, propositional logic) 2. Fuzzy Logic (fuzzy sets, fuzzy reasoning) 3. Intuitionistic Logic (constructive logic, intuitionistic reasoning) 4. Modal Logic (possibility, necessity, modal operators) 5. Temporal Logic (time, temporal reasoning) This outline provides a foundation for exploring various mathematical systems and frameworks. Remember, the key is to adapt and combine these systems to suit the specific problem or context, fostering a flexible and innovative approach to mathematics. Problem/Context | Mathematical System/Framework 1. Cryptography | Modular Arithmetic, Finite Fields 2. Quantum Mechanics | Linear Algebra, Vector Spaces, Non-Standard Analysis 3. Fractal Image Compression | Fractal Geometry, Self-Similarity 4. Optimization Problems | Linear Programming, Calculus, Optimization Techniques 5. Chaotic Systems | Dynamical Systems, Non-Linear Dynamics 6. Fuzzy Control Systems | Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Analysis 7. Network Topology | Graph Theory, Topology 8. Probability Theory | Measure Theory, Probability Spaces 9. Relativity | Differential Geometry, Non-Euclidean Geometries 10. Computer Science | Discrete Mathematics, Category Theory 11. Epidemiology | Dynamical Systems, Differential Equations 12. Materials Science | Solid-State Physics, Group Theory 13. Music Theory | Group Theory, Symmetry 14. Image Processing | Linear Algebra, Fourier Analysis 15. Time Series Analysis | Dynamical Systems, Fourier Analysis

[@MaseratiDrip]

@@Steveriknows Hold my beer: Title: Flexible Mathematical Frameworks: A New Paradigm for Interdisciplinary Research Abstract: We propose a novel approach to mathematical modeling, incorporating flexible frameworks that adapt to complex systems and phenomena. This paradigm shift has far-reaching implications for interdisciplinary research, enabling innovative solutions and new insights in physics, engineering, economics, and more. Introduction: * Brief overview of traditional mathematical approaches and their limitations * Motivation for flexible mathematical frameworks * Thesis statement: Flexible mathematical frameworks offer a powerful tool for addressing complex problems across disciplines Key Concepts: * Modular arithmetic and finite fields * Non-standard analysis and infinitesimals * Fuzzy logic and fuzzy analysis * Category theory and functors Applications: * Physics: Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Chaos Theory * Engineering: Signal Processing, Control Systems, and Materials Science * Economics: Modeling Complex Systems and Uncertainty Case Studies: * Fractal image compression using fuzzy analysis * Optimization problems solved with non-standard analysis * Category theory in network topology Discussion: * Implications for interdisciplinary research and collaboration * Potential challenges and open questions * Future directions and areas of exploration Conclusion: * Recap of key points and contributions * Call to action: Encouraging experts to explore and develop flexible mathematical frameworks Appendix: * Additional resources and references * Mathematical derivations and proofs (as needed) Here's a breakdown of when to use and remove 1 and 0 in various mathematical contexts: Use 1 and 0: 1. Group Theory: 1 is the identity element for multiplication, and 0 is the identity element for addition. 2. Ring Theory: 1 and 0 serve as identity elements for multiplication and addition, respectively. 3. Calculus: 0 is crucial for defining limits, derivatives, and integrals. 4. Number Theory: 1 and 0 are essential for defining congruences, modular arithmetic, and Diophantine equations. 5. Linear Algebra: 1 and 0 are used as identity elements for matrix multiplication and addition. Remove or modify 1 and 0: 1. Non-standard models of arithmetic: Modify or remove 1 and 0 to create alternative number systems, like fuzzy arithmetic or modular arithmetic. 2. Finite fields: Remove 0 and modify 1 to create finite fields with specific properties. 3. Quaternion and octonion algebras: Modify 1 and 0 to define these non-commutative algebraic structures. 4. Topological spaces: Remove 0 and 1 to define topological spaces with specific properties. 5. Fuzzy logic and probability theory: Modify 1 and 0 to represent degrees of truth and probability. Context-dependent: 1. Category theory: 1 and 0 are used as identity morphisms, but their role depends on the specific category. 2. Type theory: 1 and 0 are used as identity elements, but their behavior depends on the specific type theory. 3. Computational complexity theory: 1 and 0 are used in binary representations, but their role depends on the specific problem. Remember, these are general guidelines, and the specific context of a problem or theory may require a different approach. Mathematicians often adapt and generalize these rules to suit their needs, so it's essential to understand the underlying principles With these modified mathematical rules, we can indeed build different structures and potentially lead to breakthroughs. Space Travel: * New propulsion methods: Alternative number systems could lead to novel ways of manipulating space-time, enabling more efficient and faster travel. * Exotic matter and energy: Modified mathematical structures might help us understand and harness exotic matter and energy, facilitating advanced propulsion systems. Monetary Systems: * Alternative currency models: Non-standard arithmetic could lead to more equitable and sustainable monetary systems, addressing issues like inflation and wealth distribution. * Cryptography and security: Modified mathematical structures can enhance cryptographic techniques, ensuring more secure financial transactions. Other Potential Applications: * Quantum Computing: Alternative mathematical structures might facilitate more efficient and powerful quantum computing architectures. * Materials Science: New mathematical approaches could lead to the discovery of novel materials with unique properties. * Biology and Medicine: Modified mathematical models might help us better understand complex biological systems, leading to breakthroughs in disease treatment and regenerative medicine. By exploring and applying these modified mathematical rules, we can unlock innovative solutions and potentially revolutionize various fields. However, it's important to note that: * These ideas are highly speculative and require rigorous research and testing. * The development of practical applications will depend on the collaboration of experts from various fields. * Ethical considerations must be taken into account when exploring and implementing these new mathematical structures Flexible Mathematical Systems: * Use 1 and 0: When working with standard arithmetic, calculus, and linear algebra in well-defined contexts. * Modify or remove 1 and 0: When exploring alternative number systems, non-standard models, and specialized mathematical structures (e.g., finite fields, fuzzy arithmetic). * Context-dependent approaches: Employ geometry, algebra, and analysis in a way that depends on the specific problem domain (e.g., Euclidean geometry for classical physics, non-Euclidean geometry for relativity). * Adaptive number systems: Utilize modular arithmetic, finite fields, or other alternative number systems when tackling specific problems (e.g., cryptography, coding theory). * Generalized algebraic structures: Leverage groups, rings, fields, and other algebraic structures to model diverse phenomena, adapting them as needed. * Dynamic analytical frameworks: Switch between classical, fuzzy, intuitionistic, or other logics and analytical approaches based on the problem's requirements. * Interdisciplinary connections: Combine mathematical frameworks with insights from physics, biology, economics, or other fields to foster innovative solutions. * Embrace uncertainty and ambiguity:Acknowledge the limitations and ambiguities of mathematical representations and be willing to refine or revise them as new information arises. By embracing these flexible mathematical systems, we can develop a more comprehensive and adaptive mathematical toolkit, enabling us to tackle complex challenges and uncover new insights across various disciplines. Number Systems: 1. Standard Arithmetic (1 and 0 as identity elements) 2. Modular Arithmetic (clock arithmetic, finite fields) 3. Finite Fields (Galois fields, finite geometries) 4. Non-Standard Models (fuzzy arithmetic, intuitionistic arithmetic) 5. Alternative Number Systems (hyperreal numbers, surreal numbers) Algebraic Structures: 1. Groups (symmetries, transformations) 2. Rings (integer arithmetic, polynomial rings) 3. Fields (rational numbers, real numbers, complex numbers) 4. Vector Spaces (linear algebra, geometric algebra) 5. Lattices (order theory, lattice theory) Geometric Frameworks: 1. Euclidean Geometry (classical geometry) 2. Non-Euclidean Geometries (hyperbolic, elliptical, parabolic) 3. Fractal Geometry (self-similarity, scaling) 4. Topology (point-set topology, algebraic topology) 5. Differential Geometry (curvature, manifolds) Analytical Frameworks: 1. Classical Analysis (limits, derivatives, integrals) 2. Fuzzy Analysis (fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic) 3. Intuitionistic Analysis (constructive mathematics, intuitionistic logic) 4. Non-Standard Analysis (infinitesimals, hyperreal numbers) 5. Category Theory (functors, natural transformations) Logical Systems: 1. Classical Logic (Boolean logic, propositional logic) 2. Fuzzy Logic (fuzzy sets, fuzzy reasoning) 3. Intuitionistic Logic (constructive logic, intuitionistic reasoning) 4. Modal Logic (possibility, necessity, modal operators) 5. Temporal Logic (time, temporal reasoning) This outline provides a foundation for exploring various mathematical systems and frameworks. Remember, the key is to adapt and combine these systems to suit the specific problem or context, fostering a flexible and innovative approach to mathematics. Problem/Context | Mathematical System/Framework 1. Cryptography | Modular Arithmetic, Finite Fields 2. Quantum Mechanics | Linear Algebra, Vector Spaces, Non-Standard Analysis 3. Fractal Image Compression | Fractal Geometry, Self-Similarity 4. Optimization Problems | Linear Programming, Calculus, Optimization Techniques 5. Chaotic Systems | Dynamical Systems, Non-Linear Dynamics 6. Fuzzy Control Systems | Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Analysis 7. Network Topology | Graph Theory, Topology 8. Probability Theory | Measure Theory, Probability Spaces 9. Relativity | Differential Geometry, Non-Euclidean Geometries 10. Computer Science | Discrete Mathematics, Category Theory 11. Epidemiology | Dynamical Systems, Differential Equations 12. Materials Science | Solid-State Physics, Group Theory 13. Music Theory | Group Theory, Symmetry 14. Image Processing | Linear Algebra, Fourier Analysis 15. Time Series Analysis | Dynamical Systems, Fourier Analysis

[@bobbyologun1517]

jokes on your DxK is rubbish

[@TheRealGaryStu]

Paid $10 for a ticket to Deadpool/Wolverine, So I get to see it eleventeen times.

[@Dogfoodwithhotsaucexx420xx]

Noice.

[@DanielRey-o8f]

I used to have a friend who was very personable, easy to talk to and kind of fun as a person. One time we were talking and somehow got into Flat Earth theory. Turns out he knew everything there was to know about it, and he very enthusiastically gave me the run-down. One by one he'd present "facts", and I'd tell him how or why they were wrong. My refutations bounced off him like rubber balls, and he always had more "facts". He was a pilot so I tried to get him on that one, but it backfired, he felt like his experience there proved that the earth was flat; when he took off and after leveling the plane out, he never had to adjust the flaps off-level. If the planet was a ball and he was flying in a straight line, he'd wind up in outer space. He didn't wind up in space, so the earth was flat. So essentially he didn't understand gravity, and certainly hadn't thought of the curvature of spacetime. Similarly in other arguments he just lacked some basic understanding and thinking skills. Had he been interested in learning it would have been an interesting conversation, a challenge, but he wasn't. He really wasn't. He enjoyed the social aspects of talking, and of having a unique set of information (bogus or not) which he could talk to people about. He probably had a sense of camaraderie with other flat earthers that was more important to him than actually knowing anything or being "correct". He didn't really seem to have a grasp of what objective information was, or why it is important.

[@donthesitatebegin9283]

He was happy in his delusory World. Weep for him.

[@VidkunQL]

That's really eye-opening. I thought that the Flat Earthers were just people pretending to believe something obviously false as a lark, for attention. Now I think I understand: they don't _believe_ that theory in the way that I and most people _believe_ theories, they're just people with very weak epistemology in whom a weird meme has taken root.

[@rob.parsnips]

Good analysis

[@jellyd4889]

Also watches Joe R to get important info, I bet..

[@AFRoSHEENT3ARCMICHAEL69]

@@donthesitatebegin9283 Everyone lives in their own self create delusion. what's your point?

[@alphaomega1351]

Are you saying my physics degree from Terrence Howard University is essentially worthless? 🤔

[@tellaoluwatobaibrahim]

😂😂😂😂

[@DeltaMale5000]

No it's good as my PhD from Captain Morgan State University

[@TurdBoi666]

😂😂

[@ruisantos7363]

C tier actor thinks is an A tier scientist

[@cdm1949]

Have you tried multiplying it by 1?

[@stefanodadamo6809]

Academy Award for "The Dunning-Kruger Effect"

[@Volkbrecht]

Why the category? I watched part of that podcast, that was extremely good acting.

[@gordongarmaise6244]

The Dunning-Kruger Effect is that people with some expertise are overconfident in their expertise. Terrance Howard does not seem to have any expertise outside acting.

[@Polit_Burro]

The Dunning-Kruger Click was the terror of Harry Herpson High School.....

[@DemolitionManDemolishes]

You people making fun of him, but after listening to the podcast I started to believe that his brain actually functions on 1x1=2 principle 😁

[@mstcrow5429]

Which was later to be found to actually not exist, per the authors. Oops.

[@EddieJay_1312]

"Joe Rogan certainly knows how to multiply his pennies" OUCH That was an uppercut right to the nose

[@mikee2121]

"...unconscious children pretending to be important adults." This is a great definition for actors😂

[@photonomist6345]

Please don't blame all actors for this one's words!!

[@bassbacke]

@@photonomist6345 Exactly, it's just a great definition for this particular actor/person (maybe some others). Generalization is generally a bad idea. ;)

[@brycehins206]

What he wrote wasn't even a sentence, but a run-on.

[@monnoo8221]

children often make the mistake of over-generalizing....

[@ElCapitanDeLaNoche]

@@bassbacke Generally speaking, of course. 😉

[@phantomjoker5362]

It's getting to the point where people are starting to forget how to count... What a scary future

[@jtboss8139]

Well I mean 😂 we don't even know what a woman IS now 😂

[@LeonardLeon]

Yeah, but we always had trouble with counting. To this day I have no idea how to properly count up to PI.

[@jeffidyle4957]

@@jtboss8139 We don't really know how to define life or death either, but we've got some ideas. Is a virus living or dead? Is clinical death really death (ask Nikki Sixx about that one)? The idea is to get closer to the truth by studying it more. People like you aren't helpful at all in the matter.

[@independentsoldier4274]

bro i got ai to talk too for ffs..what do you expect

[@jsniagara8202]

What is 1 plus 1?

[@ftyuv]

It's interesting that he says you can only multiply values with the same units, but then also cities E = mc², which multiplies values with different units. He can't even decide on his own math rules.

[@michaelblacktree]

Never mind the fact that we literally have units of measure based on multiplying different units... like pound-feet or Newton-meters of torque.

[@RegebroRepairs]

He is an ignorant narcissist. He doesn't understand what he says, but he believes whatever he says, per definition, is correct.

[@aureliontroll2341]

​@@michaelblacktree u dont have to get so far ... m/s . Basic velocity

[@michaelblacktree]

@@aureliontroll2341 - exactly

[@mcr9822]

I’m pretty sure my utilities company multiplies different units together.

[@srikanthan1000]

He’s not the problem . He’s the symptom of modern education and the internet. U would be surprised how many ppl would be willing to debate such nonsense.

[@wilsonli5642]

It was years ago that Terrence Howard was reported (and widely mocked) as being confused by why 2+2 = 2 x 2. I'm actually kind of impressed that instead of, for example, getting a math tutor with his millions of dollars, he decided to write a whole book on his own.

[@fredrickcampbell8198]

And managed to define 1+1 = 1×1.

[@SteveSteeleSoundSymphony]

You could say he doubled down. But, oops, that gains him nothing.

[@fredrickcampbell8198]

@@SteveSteeleSoundSymphony Nah, it gains him two. "Needs the same dimensions" is literally one of addition's constraint.

[@Syphirioth]

Buy how will 3x3 or 3+3 work then? Those answers be 9 and 6 and not 6 and 6 or 9 and 9. Anyome believing this guy his logic aboit 1+1 should make a coffee. Them when the coffee is done drink it. Then put 1 finger in front of the coffee so you see that finger. And try make 2 coffee from that one coffee by adding the finger into it. Of he succeed we believe... 😂😂

[@fredrickcampbell8198]

@@Syphirioth According to this guy, multiplication is addition. Not helpful at all. 3×3 = 3+3 based one what I've seen Sabine cover.

[@anthonycarbone3826]

Terrence Howard is not the first person to be blinded by his own aura of magnificence. Too many of us have had an aha moment that after further investigation disappears into the ether. The problem is the person has to admit their own shortfall as soon as possible or live under a delusion that is not based in reality.

[@marksea64]

I've often been blinded by my own aura of magnificence, and probably other things too. But I never thought 1x1 was anything but 1. This is pure, unadulterated stupidity, in combination with mental illness.

[@JeoshuaCollins]

Absolutely. I, myself, have figured out exactly how modern cosmology is wrong, and how we live in a static universe, having figuried out that gravity pulls back on every light ray that is emitted, causing it to red-shift naturally over time, and thus galaxies aren't really moving away from each other but rather static. And then I discovered "Cosmological Redshift", a known quantity, and how it was simply not powerful enough to fully explain away cosmic expansion.

[@Foolish188]

"Dissappears into the Ether"! Like the Ether!

[@gunnerandersen4634]

Ether is proven to no exist xD

[@nissetuta]

We all know TH speaks bullcrap. It is a money grab:)

[@anthonyquantrill119]

Terrence Howard thought his supporting role should be paid twice that of the Tony Stark part, in Iron Man 2, which is why he was dropped from that movie

[@triaxon3791]

yeah, his math didn't add up in the real world. haha

[@drsjamesserra]

lmao, was he even in the movie, can’t remember seeing this guy.

[@bobinthewest8559]

Well… if 1x1=2… I can’t imagine what a few million times two could be 😂😂😂

[@nicomal]

​@@drsjamesserraHe was on the first iron man and then was replaced by Don Cheadle

[@anthonylosego]

@@nicomal I always wondered why he was replaced, but now it's all starting to make sense.

[@a.karley4672]

Somehow, I'm slightly encouraged that this attracts 7 times the number of comments that the shortly-before discussion on fraud in COVID science.

[@falklumo]

Note: In the Rogan podcast, Terrence claims to have spoken at Oxford. This is deceptive, he spoke at "Oxford Union", a club which is NOT affiliated with Oxford University!

[@steffenbendel6031]

No, He spoke at Oxford multiplied by Union.

[@dw620]

@@steffenbendel6031 More like Oxford ∪ Loonies. Game, set and match. ; )

[@chri-k]

@@steffenbendel6031But you can't multiply those

[@alankott3129]

@@chri-k Keith Moon could. I have no idea where that thought came from

[@jimmygravitt1048]

Still, it's a little disturbing Terry was able to even speak at so prestigious of an organization. Just because it's not Oxford University doesn't mean it's not it's not a highly reputable organization. He either conned someone or paid someone.

[@josephclark5414]

Sabine’s humor is “seriously” underestimated!!!! In tears, thank you!!!

[@mrman5517]

Germans take their humor very seriously, for them it is no laughing matter!

[@friskeysunset]

Dry as the Sahara. It can take serious mental effort to even detect it, which keeps me coming back for more.

[@alexisgs8800]

Hahaha me too, I laughed so much

[@jimsackmanbusinesscoaching1344]

Engineering is the biggest problem for Terrance Howard and other science deniers. Engineers apply the laws of science and the math to build products and services that we all use everyday. If the laws and math are wrong, why do the products and services work? This goes from things like buildings and bridges to computer chips and GPS. That last requires calculations involving both the special theory and general theory of relativity. Just remember to thank Einstein each time Google Maps gets you someplace.

[@cherubin7th]

Because "Engineers" like Elon Musk claim scientists are just publishing nonsense and the engineers have to ignore it.

[@sterlingmillhollon2520]

I just finished studying basic electromagnetic field theory for my engineering degree. So I have a bit of physics under my belt. When Terence said that all energy was in motion I was like what about potential energy? I knew everything after that trash.

[@KAIZORIANEMPIRE]

MATE I never used special or general theory in my construction theory lol it's basic neutonian stuff lol, stop the cap, some engineering fields like material science sure but consruction? nah this is neutonian stuff

[@walter274]

@@KAIZORIANEMPIRE Even that wouldn't work if we were all wrong about multiplcation.

[@heinzhaupthaar5590]

​@@KAIZORIANEMPIRE Read more careful before you reply - he's specifically talking about GPS, not bridge construction/general engineering etc. pp.

[@HuwDouglasEvans]

Being wrong in a complicated, verbose, convoluted, and grandiose way, is still being wrong.

[@greaseweeklygames]

I solved science in a dream, but forgot it in another dream

[@TLDCHWTTOS]

Unless you have the capacity to vividly recall one dream inside of another you forgo the dream before you made it back to sleep. The problem with channels like this are commenters like this. Mindlessly and ignorantly throwing rocks with mindless and ignorant rocks.

[@thoughticality6044]

And I am a time traveler from the planet Krypton, here to tell you that your dream is real and you have been called upon to prove that 1x1=2 to all the nay-sayers!

[@U-inverse369]

Your life of experience is already a dream and when you dream, you dream in a dream.

[@AndyShepherd-ng5nq]

@@TLDCHWTTOSIt was a p take.

[@TLDCHWTTOS]

@@AndyShepherd-ng5nqdefine p take. I don’t understand your assumption that I would know what that statement meant

[@PeteQuad]

The annoying part is that anyone should expect professional physicists to respond to any random person saying they have better answers.

[@myyoutube7144]

Unfortunately there's a need to combat misinformation, as people are stupid.

[@PeteQuad]

@@myyoutube7144 yes but it's not a winnable battle because it takes much longer to prove something is wrong than to make a simple dumb statement.

[@myyoutube7144]

@@PeteQuad I don't necessarily disagree. But I do tend to think that within reason, the stupidity of popular culture should be confronted by professionals and intellectuals. I don't think they should feel compelled to combat every moron on the Internet though, or some crazy yelling in the street.

[@shmokey59]

The reality is. It’s impossible to debunk someone especially only being 3D beings. It’s impossible to know everything or be 100% right

[@benjones7634]

​@shmokey59 yeah but I still don't think 1x1 is 2. That's why it draws ire from those that work in the field

[@motterbe]

One of the many issues present here is that Howard speaks quickly and *seemingly coherently* about the topics he is discussing. I did listen to the entire 3 hour podcast (with someone who wanted my opinion on it) and the only reason I made it through the whole thing was sheer stubbornness. We were literally pausing it every 10-20 seconds for me to say "well thats not right" "that is not quite right" "that made sense until the last bit" and "nope, that is definitely wrong", but the bits in between were factual. He would string together things that are true to conclude things that aren't. And crucially, he *sounds* like he knows what he's talking about. He speaks with conviction. That in itself is a powerful thing and goes a long way toward seeming competent and being convincing (why do so many people believe politicians who say things that obviously won't happen). All in all it was a frustrating three hours. But I don't see it as a "problem with society", more so a feature of a society which allows free speech and contains methods of magnifying certain individual's voices to reach a large audience. But there are members of that audience who will look around at those captured by that voice and speak up saying "no, I'm sorry, that isn't right".

[@stankozeljak8761]

Congratulations, you've managed to give a considerate response. Bettering the author of this video, who unfortunately does exactly what most people do, lash out, recite rumours of mental health issues and attack character, belittle, judge, and so on.

[@meandonlymeandher5747]

She saying that she is better than russel...

[@marktinkler6897]

Stringing factual stuff together in somewhat logical ways is how fiction works best.

[@Brian-uy2tj]

I was at a friends and a fellow we both knew came over. This was 30 years ago. He was worked up over some paranoid theory popular at the time. He kept saying "It is a statement of fact that" and then blah, blah, crazy shit. You should've seen his face when I told him "saying statement of fact doesn't make it a fact".. I wasn't supposed to pull back the curtain.

[@motterbe]

@@marktinkler6897 Exactly. I told my friend that even if it sounds good and sounds right (some of it did, I'm not saying 1x1=2 sounds right) that doesn't make it right. Take Jurassic Park, for example. Michael Crighton did a fantastic job of using what seemed to be logical and sound science to present a story about making dinosaurs, but it isn't happening for real because the punchline just isn't true. Even if mosquitoes existed when dinosaurs roamed the earth, and they got stuck in amber and petrified, and we were able to find them, *that doesn't mean we could reconstruct dino DNA*, no matter how convincing it sounds.

[@michaelhansson1242]

Imagine that they even let Terrence speak at Oxford I sure hope the students got their tuitions fee back...

[@zbop220]

We really need more History of Science courses. Science has collected so much knowledge but I hardly ever hear the story of how we earned each brick to build with. There's a few short stories that are popular like Galileo and his telescope, Newton's Apple, the double slit experiment, but most of the time it's told in a way that says hey this thing happened but not as much emphasis on why it's important, what builds on it, why it's a solid foundation. For far too many people saying it's Science sounds no different than my religious book says so, because they've never been given a more complete picture of how we earned this.

[@jamesandrews8698]

i agree the history of science is completely ignored in the us, thats gotta change

[@Jalcolm1]

Try Kathy loves physics

[@humanbean3]

I just try to use examples like "man when to the moon with Newton's math", to make people realize this isn't just some abstract philosophy we ponder about.

[@anotherfreediver3639]

Well in my school days (1970s) we learned science almost as an historical thing, working through the discoveries in roughly the historical order, with some historical notes on the folks who did it, not just the theories themselves. It was important, because at any one point you knew what was known before, and possibly more important, what wasn't. I have an idea why it's unfashionable to do it that way, but I still think it's the best way.

[@marylousherman5471]

I never learned algebra very well in school and was always frustrated with all the little steps and rules that seemed to change under certain conditions, plus, I didn't learn or know where it came from....then I found a book by Gliek, a science writer, who gave the historical background on Newton, struggling to develop a mathematical language/model to describe his cosmic/physics theories. It helped! Math teachers: give some historical background!

[@michamarkowski2204]

Both traditional and social media are to be blamed. During pandemic a famous singer in my country with no relevant education thought she's an authority in virusology. Newspapers printed her words, tv stations invited her to discuss COVID and for whatever reason people thought a celebrity was someone they should listen when it comes to pandemic.

[@mark69985]

Science illiteracy + increasing distrust in institutions + political correctness (where every point of view is valid ).

[@bojangles2492]

You know who else is good at increasing their pennies? Pharmaceutical companies, I don't know who this singer and she probably is an idiot but don't think for a moment science won't bend itself for money and power.

[@5m0k3y9]

Same here in the US, but our idiot got elected president!

[@GrandAncientOak]

The blame is with the institutions that betrayed the people and made the people lose trust.

[@CraftAero]

The US had an actor/conman in charge of everything.

[@Vondoodle]

I find this sad

[@PuppetMasterdaath144]

He meant that its an abstraction not a direct 1to1 representation of empirical reality, just like Newtonian physics is not the ultimate representation of reality, its just an approximate, that's all he meant lol, just think about it you're arguing that he literally believes that 1x1=2, how are you that superior complexed to assume he meant it like that, hes talking about changing the axioms because maybe other axioms would be better apt at mirroring reality, I find it weird the lack of logic

[@gh8447]

@@PuppetMasterdaath144 Don't be a Howard apologist - you'll just lower yourself to his level.

[@Vondoodle]

But I am superior - my mum told me me

[@soundtrancecloud5101]

😂

[@J0n3zH]

What is really sad is the sheer amount of commenters on the Rogan stream who seem to think he's on to something great.

[@jordilt3449]

This video deserve to be shown in the schools. Too often students there think that education is useless while they dream to be famous. the message: "Look what happens when you become famous but you have lack of knowledge on the most basic things teached in school. You dont want that this happens to you". Being good at something (whatever is acting, doing music, tik-tok videos or whatever) does not make someone a source of knowledge nor a role model, unless that person good at that something teaches about how he has become good on doing that specific thing. If Mr. Terrence Howard would talk about how to be an actor, well, he could maybe really teach something. But being good on that does not necessarly makes him better on anything else.

[@Dogfoodwithhotsaucexx420xx]

If you're worth twenty million dollars it doesn't matter much unless you for whatever reason decide to become a self proclaimed physicist. Terry is pretty rich... I don't know why he would waste his time with this and that's why I suspect he probably has schizophrenia..

[@Dogfoodwithhotsaucexx420xx]

That's also how I feel when I see Bill Gates, a drop out computer programmer, call himself a "vaccine expert" ... Lol no , Bill.

[@papateachme]

Sabine showing these equations to Terence Howard is like me explaining to a pigeon how chess works

[@mikee2121]

Hey, easy on the pigoens! Turns out they're actually smarter than Terence Howard.

[@aureliontroll2341]

That is pigeons racism . They are far more intelligent than the 1 to third power equals pi

[@dw620]

Indeed. But never try this with crows or ravens as they'll end up taking over the world before you know it. ; )

[@victordelorientis8763]

@@dw620 We actually work for the crows but we are too naive to realize it. The whole society creates everything the crows need or will need in the future. The crows made us so we can teach them everything we learn.

[@darkphotonllc]

poops on board, walks off like it won

[@NoodleMcnoodle]

The height of ignorance meets the height of arrogance. This is Terrence Howard.

[@Biosynchro]

And delusion.

[@JewelEzra]

I watched him with Joe Rogan on the professor's channel. It was as gruelling as anyone could imagine.

[@KenjaTimu]

He's even using words incorrectly. Clickish is not a word. And 'unconscious children' is clearly wrong.

[@noto-bs]

may be he learnt it from this. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqrFgXdmi9h5hpI

[@c.james1]

@@KenjaTimu I have not watched it, so I have no idea about the context, but could he mean cliquish? Most Americans mispronounce clique as click.

[@pikiwiki]

"he certainly knows how to multiply his pennies"

[@OtterFlys]

Bingo!

[@consciousness147]

Thanks I only just got that 😂

[@frokenstein]

I'm glad she called him out. Constantly platforming these wackjobs is making us all dumber.

[@jamesmoore9618]

My jaw hit the floor. So smooth, Such class by Dr. Hossenfelder.

[@shannonharrison7711]

😂

[@ogolarickie2971]

Thank you...👏👏👏.. someone had to say it. He has no place to discredit people who have sacrificed alot in the field of physics and mathematics..

[@nightwaves3203]

It's the same math his agent used explaining how the agents cut of movie deals go. One for you and two for me.

[@fibonaccisrazor]

😅

[@convects9656]

This is sad, it truly reflects how messed up the modern education system is

[@deth3021]

No it shows how messed up science is.

[@remcogreve7982]

It is some time ago that he had that education and not everybody has the same abilities. The real problem is the modern media and social media.

[@gomer2813]

IDK about that. He probably got through education system normally and made up his own ideas as an adult.

[@Robert-er5wq]

I think the problem is that stupid people are no longer being told that they are stupid, at least stupid in some subject matter field (doesn't mean they can't be lovely parents or convincing actors) and need to shut up. Maybe the school system shouldn't hand out some certificate of attendance when the track record is too horrible to contemplate. Maybe we need to shame people at least for their egregiousness as has happened in this video? Bring the dunce hat back?

[@chronoshin8597]

Education system isn't messed up. Social media system is the one messed up.

[@RolandGiersig]

"This looks promising, so let's have a look" is the best diss for extremely stupid suggestions, I'm stealing that for the next video conference... 😁

[@KevinMcGrath-NCC1701D]

Pauli supposedly said of a worthless idea that it was "not even wrong". Bohr would use the phrase "very interesting" to indicate politely that an idea is without merit (as otherwise, he would have asked probing questions). I'll be pleased to add Sabine's left-handed compliment to this collection.

[@MillionDollarMindset]

All these negative people who have not even talk to him to explain it to dumb it down for you including the women in this video. No one understood Einstein but now he's a genius. This world is full of sheep you follow everything people say I bet more the 99% of yall have not even looked into his work yourself.

[@HikingUtah]

@@MillionDollarMindset What you fail to realize is that most people are smarter than you and can actually tell that he's speaking nonsense. That's different from not being able to understand it. And it's different from having a pro-establishment bias. The problem is your ability to understand, and your anti-establishment bias.

[@Random-ob7dc]

@@MillionDollarMindset "All these negative people" It's called being critical. "who have not even talk to him to explain it" Why would anyone have to talk to anybody to disprove 1 * 1 = 2? It doesn't matter who you talk to, 1 * 1 is *always* 1. There's nothing to explain, if he wanted to, he could do it in his book. "to dumb it down for you" I don't think it's possible to "dumb it down" anymore, it's already at the lowest level I could imagine. "including the women in this video" Women? What do you mean women? There's literally only one. "No one understood Einstein but now he's a genius" Nope, plenty of people understood Einstein. That argument is dumb. By that logic anyone could write literally *anything* and be called a "genius" cause Einstein was. "This world is full of sheep" Yes, people like you eat up anything they see. "you follow everything people say" You're complaining about others doing exactly what you're doing...? Have you not yet learned about hypocrisy? "I bet more the 99% of yall have not even looked into his work yourself" If we had to look into the works of *every* person that's ever written something or said something about "science" we'd die before doing anything else. Get it peer reviewed and then I'll look into it.

[@vtblda]

@@MillionDollarMindset go back and edit your comment one more time because I only saw one "woman" in this video! No "women" you see? This is the problem with most of the incredulous people who like to write nonsense comments disguised as wisdom propositions. Take care and be wise.

[@poonoi1968]

I love this!!! Sabines dry burns is like hearing verbal machinegun fire. This is a video I might want to see more than once 😁

[@dennis_doom]

This guy forced chat GPT to say he is indeed right, and then ask it to explain how is that. That is how that book was born

[@punlam6740]

That is brilliant

[@BirdbrainEngineer]

2:32 is that not supposed to be 5 meters...? It would be such a nice example of how to think of units physically only to be butchered by the editor and nobody else catching such an elementary mistake...

[@infinitebuzz]

Yes, I thought that was going to be a joke, but seemingly it's a typo

[@vidal9747]

Yes, but the magnitude and the dimensions are right, so it is good enough for a Physicist...

[@yesman8682]

Kinda ironic.

[@mikethespike7579]

Yep, 5m according to my maths. Still, this is about the units, so the point is valid.

[@joaidane]

Never noticed it till reading your comment. I only checked the dimensional analysis and moved on! (I guess actually multiplying 5X1 was the hard part! :) I'm sure Sabine will get a laugh out of it.

[@Arkangel88Mr]

When you are at the point where a physicist has to go on KZbin to tell people that 1x1 is not 2, like some actor and an online charlatan said, then you know you are in trouble.

[@luluplace2912]

Love you.. keep going 😘

[@dathighguy1609]

Here is where lies the problem. This woman has dictated what can or can not be theory that, with even a cursory glance we can all see that this guy obviously is way off the track. Can you show that his actions bring any disdain or malice to your reality? No. I say, although wrong, it is ESSENTIAL, that we hold to our merits. That everyone, right or wrong, can make a point. }Imagine if A Patent Clerk had a sudden notion that maybe he was on a silly mathematical riddle of nothing and threw out what we all use as a base to our physics and quantum physics. And again? Is Einstein even correct in everything? NO. He dismissed black holes as a theoretical construct that could never occur in nature. The real issue is this. Science, today has failed greatly the people of the world. People can no longer put any assurance into a system that is no longer using scientific principles and methods but rather personal attacks and dogma of their own creations that may or may not be itself valid. Maybe it is the weed. But, the arrogance of this woman and her intollarance shows the world why maybe we should not count on science anymore as a source. But. It should be what it always was. A tool. That's my TLDR on this whole hogwash.

[@usarms149]

@@dathighguy1609 pointing out inaccuracies and stating facts is not intolerance. Stop being such a snowflake.

[@BigUriel]

​@@dathighguy1609 "Science, today has failed greatly the people of the world." - He says while he writtes a comment on a piece of programmable electronic hardware, to send over a worldwide network supported by space satellites so people from all over the world can read his mental diarrhea, all of it powered by a combination of thermal power stations, wind turbines, photovoltaic cells, hydroelectric dams and nuclear reactors. Yeah, it hard to see what good this science thing is amiright?

[@TonyWhitley]

My proofreading superpower says: *intolerance* I couldn't be bothered reading the rest of your drivel.

[@glenliesegang233]

"A sucker's born every minute." P.T. Barnum.

[@pmcruz1112]

Terrence Howard may have two first names but all I can think about with him are two surnames: Dunning and Kruger

[@Howiefm28496]

Actually it’s just Dunce

[@rehab_reject]

Precisely

[@jed70]

Fire.

[@tellaoluwatobaibrahim]

😂,😂😂😂

[@pegasus5287]

Why is everyone so afraid of this man?

[@richardtibbetts574]

Who would want to live downstream from a dam that was designed by an engineer who wholeheartedly believes that 1x1=2?

[@Volkbrecht]

Not exactly a problem there. I'm not too well educated in dam-building, but my guess is the workers instructed by such an engineer would not be able to get the concrete to flow. You'd be living downstream of a perfectly unobstructed river ;)

[@dw620]

I'm sticking with beavers, thank you.

[@wayando]

😂😂😂

[@fluffymcdeath]

​@@Volkbrechthave you tried looking at concrete flow through a feminist lens.

[@jaymorse1417]

So what does 1 x 2 equal? 3 ? 😂

[@fellowshipofthethings3236]

Terrence Howard is the new gold standard for Dunning-Kruger.

[@mugdays]

What's most upsetting is Terrence doesn't know that what goes in the parentheses is supplemental (that is, non-essential) information.

[@rolirolster]

In a parallel universe, where things are the right way round, people like this lady are the ones idolised on social media.

[@dominicgarcia85]

Time does move right way round on a clock

[@user-ue5yw6zb9k]

Why would anyone idolize anyone who refuses to listen to another in order to have a respectable debate?

[@ManBearJordan]

@@user-ue5yw6zb9k Im not sure who is behind these rage bait comments but no matter the issue they always have this username...

[@AnimeVillageAMV]

The right way round would be no one idolisers anyone!

[@joeshmoe7967]

@@user-ue5yw6zb9k Not clear on what you mean, but there is no possibility of a debate, with a Terrence Howard type. He is just spouting rubbish. Not one word of his 'new theory of everything' has any basis in reality.

[@Tom-kw6km]

I love her take on this actor. My favorite line, "...he has an entire conspiracy theory about how Bank of America miscalculates your pennies. Oh dear".

[@Isolder74]

He should try transferring all the 1/2 cents in the system to himself.

[@sleeplessentertainments]

There is no smoke without fire. I do not believe in throwing away the baby with the bath water. If aliens were to arrive on earth they would find that 90% of our theores are all thrash. Fact

[@MichaelWillems]

“One Chopsticktesla”--that had me literally laughing out loud. You’re hilarious.

[@sumofat4994]

Simp

[@socksumi]

Dunning Kruger is taking over in Hollywood.

[@nicholas5396]

"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit." W.C. Fields

[@AlumniQuad]

" _Now, I may not have gone to some fancy art school, but if you ask me, you people wouldn’t know real beauty if it was outside in the parking lot taking a crap on all your cars. Which, by the way, it is just seconds away from doing..._ " Terence Maddox

[@oarsteed]

Great quote but Fields never said it.

[@nicholas5396]

@@oarsteed 😱 say it ain't so!

[@AlumniQuad]

@@oarsteed It's actually attributed to Debbi Fields, founder of Mrs. Fields Cookies.

[@oarsteed]

@@AlumniQuad The original source is mundane, hence the attribution to Fields, the cookies or comedy version: "Well, if I can't dazzle them with brilliance, I baffle them with my bull." --from "Proceedings of the Regular Meeting," 1958, Volumes 100-138, Pacific Northwest Shippers Advisory Board

[@carlbrenninkmeijer8925]

Thank you for your patience, the debunking and as ever for the right sprinkle of humor, that makes it digestable, without bitterness about sillyness.

[@Michelle-bn1fu]

We are approaching the future in "Idiocracy" much faster than the movie suggested

[@hermes667]

As things go more and more complicated, to a wide degree non-scientist simply have to trust in science. Science is the base information for good political decissions. So if a political system lost trust of the people, they tend to question the science as well.

[@superbnns]

People who copy/paste this comment act as if stupid people being in positions of power is something unique to the past 10 years

[@mikepettengill2706]

It is jarring how often it seems prophetic.

[@Flip_Goat]

The movie has become the roadmap of humanity. This woman should have 12 children, but instead Stacy and Darrel from the trailer park had them. We’re screwed.

[@RFC3514]

President Camacho would be an upgrade over the recent past.

[@LuthierFlying]

This is the world we live in. We are all now attention junkies. And what better way to get attention than to be controversial. Trump does it every day. and Rogan sat there and lapped it all up like he was talking to Einstein. Scientific word salad, and pictures with circles and arrows on the back of each one, that’s all we have here. Hopefully he’s not making any money, insulting our intelligence.

[@adamshinbrot]

If I were Terrence Howard, I'd examine my plumbing for signs of lead.

[@dw620]

"pbpbpbpbpbpbpb" - Terrence.

[@ColdRunnerGWN]

If I were his doctor, I'd be checking for signs of brain activity.

[@bobaldo2339]

Ditto for Joe Rogan.

[@ColdRunnerGWN]

@@bobaldo2339 - TBF, I think it's the steroids, not lead.

[@macsnafu]

Well, that's the problem. If you're a mad hatter with lead poisoning, why would you even *think* that you were poisoned, much less look for the cause of it?

[@midgetsow]

"Is Rogan right? Well, he certainly knows how to multiply his pennies." What an absolute ZINGER. Well done Sabine.

[@Sparroh]

She brutal and eloquent. 😂

[@MrTambourineMan.]

She has a donorbox. She is working for a living too. That’s a weird zinger

[@sentenced2sail]

Sabine has gone Mortal Combat on this poor fool :)

[@RogerB-ip8dd]

Rogan did bring on Weinstein to put him in his place. I don’t think Rogan expected what he got when bringing him on the first time

[@coryhoggatt7691]

He’s just using words wrong. Multiplying an object by zero doesn’t “make it disappear.” It was never there to begin with!

[@IdanHuSlaa]

An actually constructive comment. Like whatvi expected from the scientist lady. NoT stressing on where he is completely wrong and implying actors can't physically observe the universe. Mind you Da Vinci was a painter, philosopher. Inventor and many more and none yet measure to his brilliance till date

[@hyperpunk3]

He's just using words wrongly. Or, he's just using wrong words.

[@IdanHuSlaa]

@hyperpunk3499 @hyperpunk3499 can't blame him cause even words are programmed tools eventually written in binary like the whole world. If he uses the wrong words that proves the match is wrong

[@sentenced2sail]

Sabine has destroyed this fool pretty bad. Thank you!