Retroactive Application of New Laws: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada...

Welcome to "Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!"
In this episode, Acumen Law Corporation lawyer Kyla Lee explores the complexities of retroactive application of new laws through the case of a doctor facing disciplinary action for alleged sexual assault. This case raises crucial questions about the fairness of imposing heightened sanctions retroactively in professional disciplinary proceedings.
Key Points Discussed:
Charter Rights: Examination of Charter principles and their applicability to administrative decisions, particularly in professional regulation.
Supreme Court Review: The implications of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision not to hear the appeal and missed opportunities for clarifying legal standards.
Why This Case Matters:
This case underscores the need for clarity on the application of Charter values in administrative decisions, especially concerning retroactive penalties in professional disciplinary actions.
🔍 Topics Covered:
Retroactive laws and professional discipline
Charter rights in administrative law
Legal implications of disciplinary sanctions
Judicial review of administrative decisions
📅 New Episodes Weekly:
Subscribe to our channel for weekly insights from lawyer Kyla Lee as she analyzes cases that should have been heard by the Supreme Court of Canada.
👉 Watch more episodes: • Cases That Should Have...
👉 Follow Kyla on Twitter: irplawyer
👉 Visit our website: www.vancouvercriminallaw.com
🎥 Credits:
Thank you to Brazen Bull Creative for producing these videos.
👍 Like, Subscribe, and Share:
If you found this video insightful, please like, subscribe, and share with your network to support our channel.

[@zvenlin]

🍁