Intro To Design Of The Wing

Рет қаралды 147,782

Harvs Air Service

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 59

@hydrojet7x70 3 жыл бұрын

Right when it starts to get good, the video ends. 😳

@ac11dc110 2 жыл бұрын

done by a porn director

@0ddSavant 2 жыл бұрын

Agreed. That ending came outta nowhere.

@simpilot001 2 жыл бұрын

Ikr, he was still talking. They want you to buy the course for the whole thing I’m sure

@garywheeler2055 2 жыл бұрын

Took this ground school course for my PPL and it was amazing. Highly recommend it.

@chadhuman982 Жыл бұрын

@garywheeler2055 Жыл бұрын

Great training series, worth the money for a super ground school….. I used it and loved it 🇨🇦🍻

@terryadams1231 Жыл бұрын

It’s 11:33 pm and I’m studying for my CFI and it cuts off right when it gets good noo!

@MOTOBLADE 3 жыл бұрын

Nice explanation of planform. I appreciate the video.

@FPVREVIEWS 11 ай бұрын

Elliptical Planforms make approximately the same span wise lift distribution as the planform. Which may be "good" but is not ideal. A Bell shaped span wise lift distribution is actually ideal. Prandtl knew this back in the 30's.

@sideshowbob5237 Жыл бұрын

Fair enough as far as it goes - but wing design isn't all about aerodynamics when it comes to plan form. Inherent strength and consequent weight are equally, sometimes more, important. All forms of tapered or quasi-elliptical wings reduce maximum bending moment, increase bending strength and hence are most commonly used. Parallel wings delivering maximum lift usually need some form of structural intervention (struts) to produce a structurally efficient package, [A retired aircraft stress engineer]

@sfzdgxfhycgjuvkyihopu Жыл бұрын

What is QUASI-elliptical???

@sideshowbob5237 Жыл бұрын

@@sfzdgxfhycgjuvkyihopu For example, in plan-form: from the root of a 3m chord, a 10m leading edge radius, a 10m trailing edge radius and at the point of intersection a 0.5m blending radius. Look at the cross section of any large European petrol tanker. It will be a 3m top and bottom radius blended with a 2m side radius: nominally elliptical.

@rdspam Жыл бұрын

I suspect “as far as it goes” in this video was just the very beginning of a much longer, multi-topic discussion. This was just a teaser for courses at the web site.

@HelloMedicAnkit Ай бұрын

I have designed a wing which on simulations showing 9.5:1 (l/d) ratio for my rc plane , maximum angle of attack is 16.4 degrees and minimum is -19.6° ..and maximum Cl = 3.365 ...will it be able to maneuver properly ?? Reno varies from 2-3 , and my air craft 's total wing area is going to be 2000cm^2

@yodaiam1000 Жыл бұрын

Why does a perpendicular airflow increase the parasitic drag? You actually have a longer length over which the drag occurs on the tapper wing (for the same wing span). Is the drag from tip vortices reduced due to the higher aspect ratio near the wing tip?

@ac-130attackaircraft3 2 ай бұрын

I think it has something to do with the hypotenuse of the wings leading edge being longer to cover the same length as if it were flat giving you more surface area to which more drag comes from

@yodaiam1000 2 ай бұрын

@@ac-130attackaircraft3 I think it actually has to do with tip vortices rather than parasitic drag over the surface area. Tapered and elliptical wings are more efficient since they reduce the wing vortices compared to rectangular wings with the same wing loading. His explanation of increased parasitic drag didn't make sense to me. If that is what it is, there is something missing in the explanation.

@pythonboi5816 Жыл бұрын

so here is a question. Is it the wing that makes the Diamond DA-40 (ft. in the intro) "safer" than other airplanes like Cessna 175s and S22?

@harvsairservice Жыл бұрын

It does not. Diamond safety is about the same as any light airplane.

@abderahmenabdennour 11 ай бұрын

What does he mean by stall??

@nxnickk 9 ай бұрын

Stall refers to the wing losing lift/control. Typically due to low speed, high attack angle or both.

@abderahmenabdennour 9 ай бұрын

@@nxnickk thank you man

@MisterRorschach90 6 ай бұрын

I cannot wait until someone designs the first true variable geometry wing capable of automatically changing its shape to suit different types of flying. Utilizing shape memory alloys and polymers, or maybe even artificial muscles.

@HelloMedicAnkit Ай бұрын

@army2207 2 жыл бұрын

So is this why the f14 has a delta wing while wings are retracted

@crsrdash-840b5 2 жыл бұрын

What about a forward style swept wing?

@tonyrun5802 2 жыл бұрын

there is a video made by Real Engineering and another one made by Millenium 7* that are very good to understand why it's such a controversial design. You can just search it on yt (I'm too lazy to link them lol)... but to sum it up, basically: the airflow impacts the wing from the tip, and then goes towards the root. What this means is that the stall will occur from the root of the wing, and then it will proceed outwards to the tip. This is very good at slow speeds and high angles of attack. However, when going at higher speeds, especially supersonic ones, the bending and twisting solicitations the wing is subject to become a big problem, along with drag, which is much greater.

@evanr648 2 жыл бұрын

Wonder if there's a wing design that allows for both high speeds, maneuverability, and short take offs/landings. Like a swept wing... idk carbon cub? lol

@harvsairservice 2 жыл бұрын

If you have such a design you would be very rich!

@Karuiko Жыл бұрын

You would need to have a wing that can change it's shape, with either flaps, slats, both, or something else entirely.

@garywheeler2055 2 жыл бұрын

They offer a great ground school 🇨🇦👍🍻

@ggkxkg55 3 жыл бұрын

helped me very well . Thanks.

@brookrestall3274 3 жыл бұрын

Where is the rest of the presentation?

@harvsairservice 3 жыл бұрын

www.pilottraining.ca

@justme-n-gracie 3 жыл бұрын

you mixed up delta and tapered............

@osome6806 2 жыл бұрын

no? delta is a triangle while tapered starts out rectangular then slopes but usually never comes to a point.

@pakshah5449 Жыл бұрын

Thanks Great Video

@ChrisZoomER 3 жыл бұрын

I was hoping that he would explain the sweptback wings of jet airliners but I still love the explanation👍

@Toastryan 3 жыл бұрын

Real engineering has a video abou that

@ChrisZoomER 3 жыл бұрын

@@Toastryan I already watched that.

@Toastryan 3 жыл бұрын

@@ChrisZoomER makes sense, it has been 6 months

@Triple_J.1 3 жыл бұрын

Pretty much the only valid reason for wing sweep is to allow thicker wing sections to be flow at higher speeds than their critical Mach numbers for their respective thick-airfoil sections. e.g. an Airfoil that is 14% thickness to chord (height to length) might have a critical Mach number of 0.68 (68% the speed of sound). And an 9% Airfoil might have a critical mach number of 0.85. But a highly swept 14% thick Airfoil, which has more internal volume for structure and fuel, can attain the same Mach number speeds as a 9% Airfoil which has no sweep.

@tonyrun5802 2 жыл бұрын

@@ChrisZoomER given this comment is 9 months old I think you might've watched that too, but there is also another video about forward swept wings, made by Real Engineering... and also one made by Millenium 7*

@tombouie Жыл бұрын

Thks

@jsada60 Жыл бұрын

Must consider the economic aspects for leisure and commercial missions as well as the speed/altitude regime they will work on. Swept planforms and elliptical cost much more. Swept wings do not have good handling characteristics. Swept wings and swept tail feathers are actually worse performers at subsonic speeds under, say, Mach 0.6. For military applications, the price is of no consideration vs air superiority. Neither is the handling, unless you believe there will be dogfights in the future (highly unlikely, but possible)