Addressing Kamjiverse and Kambon on the issue of reconstruction

[@virgilettegaffin4732]

I would love to witness a discussion between Dr. Obenga & Asar Imhotep on some linguistic historys.

[@sundiataatakakranzambi]

The Quiet Storm scholar getting ready to learn you something.

[@TataMatamba88]

How can I get in contact with you

[@AsarImhotep]

You can visit my website at: www.asarimhotep.com and visit the contact page.

[@TataMatamba88]

@@AsarImhotep thank you

[@AsarImhotep]

@@TataMatamba88 you're welcome!

[@chochomasenya1410]

You sound like a scholar. So where is your work published for peer review?

[@robertrann8450]

Peace ✌️

[@dr.duarteodara]

❤❤❤

[@elski5067]

Hello brother ausar Kamjiverse says the linguistic model your proposing is wrong l, because it has does not have a living model to compare too? I personally don't believe in a Caucasian translating an ancient African language I would throw it in the bin.

[@AsarImhotep]

Peace and blessings. Thank you for watching and for your inquiry. I do not believe what you stated above is his argument. What Kamjiverse is doing is simply repeating Dr. Obadele Kambon without critique or knowledge of the field. Kambon is trying to make the argument that one should reconstruct the language of Middle-Egyptian (a dead language) INDEPENDENT of comparisons with external languages . . . THEN using that 'reconstruction' (of basic vocabulary, morphology, and phonology) as the comparisons to use in reconstructing Negro-Egyptian (the language family proposed by Theophile Obenga in 1993). This is erroneous and no one in the field advocates this procedure or even has attempted this in real life.

[@elski5067]

You answered my question in the video thank you. I have to start scrutinizing Kamjiverses info now.