AdS/CFT Correspondence, Part 1 - Juan Maldacena

  Рет қаралды 64,958

Institute for Advanced Study

Institute for Advanced Study

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 65
@elck3
@elck3 4 жыл бұрын
Interesting. You lost me at 0:00
@nicolasarias2666
@nicolasarias2666 6 жыл бұрын
Give this man his Nobel.
@psitae
@psitae 6 жыл бұрын
Nobels are pretty much finished for theoretical physicists. That being said, he definitely deserves more recognition outside the field.
@lefonddeenfer9844
@lefonddeenfer9844 5 жыл бұрын
For theory which is not proved yet?
@jojolafrite90
@jojolafrite90 5 жыл бұрын
For a correspondence that may mean nothing in physics, may mean nothing, but is still a such impressive and elegant mathematical solution that may help in a lot of domain, that we don't see yet, but one day may change a lot of things.
@teddansonLA
@teddansonLA 4 жыл бұрын
@@frankdimeglio8216 based on that bullshit, he didn't.
@peabrane8067
@peabrane8067 4 жыл бұрын
Or a Fields medal for Pete's sake.
@freddiesomme8622
@freddiesomme8622 4 жыл бұрын
Argentina proud 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
@lefonddeenfer9844
@lefonddeenfer9844 5 жыл бұрын
that moment when he says "Sorry, i've learned with Russian(actually Soviet) books.." 😊
@ASCENSiON1989
@ASCENSiON1989 5 жыл бұрын
26:20
@seionne85
@seionne85 4 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@seionne85
@seionne85 4 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@High_Altitude_Observer
@High_Altitude_Observer 3 жыл бұрын
I was looking for a recipe for a lemon cake....
@jimc.goodfellas
@jimc.goodfellas 2 жыл бұрын
A true genius of our time
@waaseyagiizhig4459
@waaseyagiizhig4459 Жыл бұрын
I am learning your work in the northern bushes of Canada. Rezlife
@lucianosr71
@lucianosr71 3 жыл бұрын
vengo por date un vlog,no lo conocia y es una verguenza que este cientifico no sea mas conocido...
@_francocarballo1314
@_francocarballo1314 3 жыл бұрын
Lo mismo jaja
@lucianosr71
@lucianosr71 3 жыл бұрын
@@lucasmanfredi9069 esta lleno de zombies de clarin...
@forrestlyric6378
@forrestlyric6378 3 жыл бұрын
I guess it's pretty off topic but does anyone know a good site to watch new tv shows online ?
@lucianosr71
@lucianosr71 3 жыл бұрын
@@forrestlyric6378 porhubb my frend
@arielkrew5450
@arielkrew5450 3 жыл бұрын
@Forrest Lyric I use Flixzone. You can find it on google =)
@JuanceMusicOK
@JuanceMusicOK 3 жыл бұрын
FUAAAAAA, JUAN ES UNA EMINENCIA! POR FAVOR TODO LO QUE SABE, ES INCREÍBLE :o
@archi124
@archi124 6 жыл бұрын
I love this guy
@dexz7646
@dexz7646 3 жыл бұрын
@@frankdimeglio8216 you dont know nothing about quantum gravity
@wordysmithsonism8767
@wordysmithsonism8767 2 жыл бұрын
Listening to genius in real-time.
@CACBCCCU
@CACBCCCU 2 жыл бұрын
It's crazy to have a reason to discourage a universal time standard, for supposing a reality of growing time divergences, especially with gravity as the only excuse. Keeping wavelength constant, together with constant time and space metrics, while letting frequency vary, means initially redshifted light realistically must be light initially slowed by decreased gravity. Same with a passing rumble-strip effect. Light frequency is independent of photon rate, meaning a constant-rate countable photon (or light pulse) source gives the only reliable light-based indicator for time rate. Heisenberg's uncertainty applied to light says a perfectly tight frequency source is a perfectly random phase timing source, so atomic clock frequency means basically nothing about the only good time rate measure, namely photon rate.
@ericnjuguna5510
@ericnjuguna5510 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent lectures
@michaelmilbocker4548
@michaelmilbocker4548 5 жыл бұрын
An additional AdS/CFT correspondence may be that of the speed of light limitation (CFT) and the Lieb-Robinson limitation (AdS).
@DellonThomas
@DellonThomas 4 жыл бұрын
what happens when the space around a black hole is expanding faster than the speed of light?
@seionne85
@seionne85 4 жыл бұрын
An event horizon
@fathare2085
@fathare2085 3 жыл бұрын
I think the analogy is space is "falling" faster than light is "rising" (analogy of General Relativity)
@knowledgesman3167
@knowledgesman3167 6 жыл бұрын
thank you for this video!
@sacramentofwilderness6656
@sacramentofwilderness6656 4 жыл бұрын
Where can one get the problem sheet, mentioned by Dr. Maldacena, is it published somewhere, maybe there is some course page, dedicated to that past event?
@Rajneshdangi1327
@Rajneshdangi1327 4 жыл бұрын
It's arxiv.org
@TIENTI0000
@TIENTI0000 5 жыл бұрын
Супер у меня нет слов
@Dmitrii-y6e
@Dmitrii-y6e 3 жыл бұрын
Does anybody know where to find the exercises he mentioned?
@pedrojoseromero2
@pedrojoseromero2 4 жыл бұрын
Genioooo....!!!
@bariizlam638
@bariizlam638 3 жыл бұрын
AdS/CFT is the sheeeezzneeeeettttt!!!
@redactedbananas
@redactedbananas Жыл бұрын
Keep the camera on the physicist. People can pause the video to finish taking notes.
@helenbostock2350
@helenbostock2350 2 жыл бұрын
Cool stuff
@pascualgonzalez1494
@pascualgonzalez1494 4 жыл бұрын
Made in argentina
@abcxyz9534
@abcxyz9534 3 жыл бұрын
Argentina stronk 😁
@santiagoacevedo4094
@santiagoacevedo4094 2 жыл бұрын
Épico
@manavnaik1607
@manavnaik1607 2 жыл бұрын
This shit is nuts no cap
@davidwilkie9551
@davidwilkie9551 7 жыл бұрын
The only coupling applicable to observations, is the general type familiar in musical chords, or, in keeping with the BBT , with a central point connection and radial time-inflation quantum field of fields, ..in the projections of a real-virtual image. It's Information distributed infinitely, in the bits and bytes of the universe, from out of a timing duration QM memory. Probability one, as it applies to the universal wave, is "counted" and established by the sampling/measurement process of infinite/eternal timing, and allows for the time-reversal counter process of "directional" superposition such that the likelihood of possible states proceeds from one to minus one, in the range/interval from infinity to possible zero at the limits. In orientation, 1-1=0, 1=1(+/-) probability, corresponds to the Quantum Mechanism +/-, = and "i" at zero coordinates of the universal wave of all orthogonal/omnidirectional superimposed possibility/probability timing combinations/permutations. "Ordinary probability is "contained" continuously within conjugate possibility "condensed" in superposition of harmonic/resonant boundaries of the observable mathematical structure. If there's to be this logical-mathematical speculation on the mode of representation of the mechanism, I'm not the one to do that because the nomenclature for complex compounded structures is application specific. The course of logic that can stay in contact with the surrounding environment is, as Professor Susskind says, best left to those with years of education in practical mechanisms of physics. Because the logical implications of a universe constructed of time, is all about "doing the filing" of memory and programs; and until I can have confirmed information of alternatives, what is observable and in the modestly well established files, is the here-now. Pure math is pure imagination because it's usually derived from the reverse process of analyzed/testable physical structures. Much appreciation for the lectures in establishing the basic Quantum principle of reasoning. _____ The intuitive base from which the observation/cause-effect correspondence of QM-Time amplitude and frequencies modulation has the same "wordless" characteristics as the dimensionless virtual vector projection of temporal superposition, infinite shaping of one connection. So it's possible to draw correspondence between almost any reasonably simple concepts, literally, in time duration terms of pulse-conglomerates of probabilities. Detachment isn't possible in the absolute, only in degree of "axial" superimposed frequencies and "tangential" modules of spacing amplitudes, the methodology and nomenclatures of arrangements that are the reasons for Education in general.
@seionne85
@seionne85 4 жыл бұрын
I feel like you just put a bunch of "science-y" words in a blender with too much vodka for your own amusement
@maxpower252
@maxpower252 2 жыл бұрын
He forgot to carry the one, thus all this is wrong.
@6313635
@6313635 4 жыл бұрын
Camera is crap fool
@dansmith3vdhrj
@dansmith3vdhrj 4 жыл бұрын
Juan is so great, "Blah, blah, blah!"
@robinwarren6924
@robinwarren6924 3 жыл бұрын
Jealous?
@dansmith3vdhrj
@dansmith3vdhrj 3 жыл бұрын
@@robinwarren6924 Absolutely, lol. He's just so fast, and the way he says, "Blah, blah, blah" is hilarious. It's like he's talking about the most basic, obvious thing you could imagine. But, yes, I wish my brain could move trough the material so effortlessly. The man is a genius's genius.
@gastonarrillaga8634
@gastonarrillaga8634 3 жыл бұрын
Everytime he's saying aaa.. aaa.. aaa.. it's annoying!
@hector555mcc
@hector555mcc Жыл бұрын
shut up
@helenbostock2350
@helenbostock2350 2 жыл бұрын
Ok no more for me not now
@Taqu3
@Taqu3 5 жыл бұрын
These lectures in general are sketchy as fuck.
@robinwarren6924
@robinwarren6924 3 жыл бұрын
Jealous?
AdS/CFT Correspondence, Part 2 - Juan Maldacena
1:19:20
Institute for Advanced Study
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Juan M. Maldacena - Are there Extra Dimensions?
9:15
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Sigma baby, you've conquered soap! 😲😮‍💨 LeoNata family #shorts
00:37
Human vs Jet Engine
00:19
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 183 МЛН
The Singing Challenge #joker #Harriet Quinn
00:35
佐助与鸣人
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Lecture 3- Physics with Witten
1:25:12
Witten
Рет қаралды 553 М.
The Holographic Universe from AdS/CFT!  | with Juan Maldacena
1:13:31
International Society for Quantum Gravity
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Leonard Susskind | "ER = EPR" or "What's Behind the Horizons of Black Holes?" - 2 of 2
1:36:22
Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics
Рет қаралды 280 М.
Lecture 1: Classical Field Theories and Principle of Locality
1:09:09
MIT OpenCourseWare
Рет қаралды 172 М.
Neutron Stars - Victoria Kaspi
1:07:17
Institute for Advanced Study
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Explaining Quantum Entanglement
22:05
Emergence
Рет қаралды 158 М.
String Theory and the AdS/CFT Correspondence | Juan Maldacena
36:37
Robinson's Podcast Clips
Рет қаралды 652
Sigma baby, you've conquered soap! 😲😮‍💨 LeoNata family #shorts
00:37