AE + AI: the way towards autonomous computers | Pierre Collet | TEDxUTTroyes

[@GeneralKenobi69420]

Wtf this guy's my teacher! Never thought I'd see him here Oo

[@whiteclaww4423]

@@abisarwan20 yep he's a teacher there (lmao seeing this in your notification feed 2 years later must feel weird)

[@PhG1961]

Interesting subject and well brought. It's defenately the future.

[@samann9]

Genetic Algorithm is what Artificial Evolution is.

[@seyyidahmedlahmer1166]

No at all, it's just one of many algorithms, there are ABC, PSO, GA...etc

[@PreciousBoxer]

Oh, give me a home where the buffalo roam, & the deer and the antelope play...

[@DrFerencAcs]

Prof. Geoffrey Hinton labeled the term deep learning. Yan LeCunn was his PhD student. AFAIK

[@shawnburnham1]

12:00

[@daphne4983]

Deep learning plus emotions equals pissed of robots.

[@spittyboy67]

What happens when the computers/ machines that have created the "advanced machine" and AI become obsolete? Will there be a machine war?

[@Aer0xander]

There will be a lot of riots with signs I guess

[@alexcarter8807]

And rotten eggs. Let there be a rotten eggs. Can't hold a good riot without 'em.

[@hindugoat2302]

your riot signs are no match for super intelligence

[@illiminatieoverlordgurglek140]

But the computer is still only does what it was programmed to do by a human, amazing as the designs or how accurate the recognition might be. It's just running trough a 'list' of possibilities and checks them with the desired parameters, isn't it? Is that creativity? Once a computer starts doing things out of it's own 'will', regardless of what a programmer told it to do should we be worried I think. For example if that design program suddenly stopped designing antennas like it was told to and started to design improvements to its own programming or something.

[@hallnuts33]

No buddy, that is why there is the term 'machine learning'. They are not programmed, they are educated, just like a human but faster

[@WildlandExplorer]

The point of the video I took away is that programmers are programming machine learning to make the programmer irrelevant (talk about career suicide!). The software will be able to mark up its own code in its own sandbox. Quality test it on its own, and update itself, in nanoseconds. It can currently design radio antennas too complicated for radio antenna designers to figure out on their own without years of research. And this is based on algorithms and a given set of conditions. It could probably become sophisticated enough to design algorithms on its own that are too complex for a programmer to easily decipher as well, simply through the brute force try-fail try- fail-success model of machine evolution. It will go from months, down to days, down to minutes to nanoseconds as code efficiency and processing speed increases.

[@Wyvernnnn]

Il a grossi Benoit Poelevoorde

[@madmanzila]

Mmmmm this seems to suggest that .... we should be afraid of this evolution made Ai.

[@prathaprpm]

first automation took shop floor jobs . now a.i is slowly replacing white colored jobs. A.E will eventually replace the very engineer developing a.i. going forward all humans may be reduced to just producing energy to power these systems.. as depicted in Matrix

[@nothanks3590]

humans are a terrible source of energy.

[@paulrevere1479]

We’ll be long gone before that happens

[@daphne4983]

AI stalking in Amsterdam

[@TerryVogelaar]

Shocking to see that AI doesn't recognize football, and calls it 'soccer' instead. It should know that the other sport is actually hand-egg.

[@alexcarter8807]

Rule 1: You do not look cool walking around on a stage in Levi's unless you're Barack Obama.

[@tjw_]

seems like he's concerned with more important things than looking cool.

[@abi-showabi-show3187]

You are making noise let the man talk.. Some sense....