Aerosoft A320X vs FSlabs A320X part 2

I made this video just for fun. It's biased and doesn't objectively compare anything, so don't take it seriously.

[@MatteoMariano]

Like if you agree: the aerosoft is for those who want to jump in and go with sufficient functionality. If you're gonna get an ATPL in the 320, then the FSL is for you. Having the aerosoft at the moment, I can't justify paying $140 for another a320. Also, aerosoft did state that they would focus on the captains role and simulate all systems that are used at least once per 5000 hours of flight. If the engines do ever fail, turn on the APU and electrical pump then you will regain control so some aspects were quite biased in my opinion but on the whole, I enjoyed the video so keep up the good work!

[@tvflight7858]

Thanks! But there is something I want to explain. It is not, that i'm expecting from aerosoft, that they will simulate the RAT turbine and other emergency systems. I just wanted to show, that fslabs does, and aerosoft doesn't simulate this "failure".

[@rileyhampton1472]

Matteo Mariano no

[@leonidasg0039]

@@tvflight7858 I'm 2 years late but whatever... since i am here i want to tell you that you are right, aerosoft has stated that their a320 isn't meant for abnormal procedures. That's why every button and panel that's considered abnormal in the fcom, can't be clicked in the aerosoft (such as the fire buttons). I also like the fslabs a lot more, but still, your comparison is not really fair, you didn't mention the little things that aerosoft is better at, like the irs init page on the mcdu, or the equitime point page.

[@tvflight7858]

Look, I would never try to compare those like this If I was serious. I made this video just for fun or "entertainment purposes". I don't even remember what I had in mind 3 years ago when making this video. I definitely didn't expect it to have more than 1k views. Aerosoft is a great product for those who fly just for fun, don't need to have all systems simulated, or just don't want to spend that ridiculous amount of money just for one plane.

[@Jetpusher]

I don’t really care for the airbus whatsoever. Most of my products are PMDG or captainsim Boeing 767 and that’s it. When I wanna fly the airbus I don’t wanna think too much about it so the Aerosoft one does the work just fine.

[@harithfisch]

The real A320 is better. No lag, realistic physics.

[@tvflight7858]

sure thing

[@Dr.farazalam]

That's the costliest addon but it doesn't even come with slew mode

[@merto31]

I must say I now own both for p3d v4... And aerosoft is fun for a weekend flight but I would not change fslabs for nothing the level of systems integration is amazing and aerosoft is way behind them... The target market is very very diferent... Fslabs is definetey study level sim as aerosoft is for someone who just wants to get the feeling they are flying an Airbus

[@Oli-zm2rn]

The Aerosoft has better sounds for the engines and the cockpit looks more realistic with the reflections...

[@jviation737]

I see where you're going with this, however for future comparisons, I would recommend being less biased about it. I completely agree that the FSL is far better, however, it's best not to shove that into the viewers face and present a straightforward comparison. Let them come to their own senses of "this is far better" rather than slam it in the face.

[@tvflight7858]

I know what you mean, but when I was making this video, I didn't expect that it is gonna be that popular. Unfortunately my average is around 200 views xd Maybe in the future I will make third part of this comparison with some voice coment and better attention to details. But I don't have time for this. My newest video has only 28 views, what is ridiculous and makes me don't want to make more.

[@jviation737]

TV FLIGHT Sorry to hear about that. No hate intended whatsoever regarding my past comment as really the FSL blows the Aerosoft out of the water. It's just as from content creator to another, people usually don't enjoy it when you're a little biased (even if it's justified)

[@320FL]

Well fslabs is better tho

[@rileyrebuild]

@@tvflight7858 still, you shouldnt be biased, saying that shows a lack of care for your viewers

[@rileyrebuild]

Yes, I agree the FSLabs is ALOT better but its also almost triple the price

[@maestro7332]

2:10 There is ILS to 29 in EPGD...

[@kevinsingh8035]

Mateusz Chalupniczak yeah the whole video was biased.

[@ccmks]

I honestly love the engine sound on Aerosoft as it is the closest one to real plane.....

[@tvflight7858]

On the ground, aerosoft has better CFM engine sound. I agree. But in the air, fslabs did better job. Sometimes, in aerosoft the IAE engines sounds like hair dryer, not like real plane. Obviously that's my personal opinion.

[@a7medal3arabi38]

i believe you can download costmised sounds iam not sure but try yes the sound in takeoff aerosoft is better

[@dries1454]

you forgot to compare the malware inside both products

[@ollietreg2334]

no@Vas Gr

[@mateo672]

What a biased joke of a video.

[@tjfSIM]

Matt Damm indeed. I get fed up with these FSlabs ‘fan boys’ bashing Aerosoft, just because their A320 doesn’t happen to have the same systems depth. And who cares, honestly, about cockpit window latches? The Aerosoft version was never marketed as a study level sim, it simulates day to day line flying more than adequately, and to my mind the visuals and modelling in the Aerosoft version are superior.

[@andrewb__0791]

@@tjfSIM well said man, respect and agree !!

[@jakob8862]

@@windshearahead7012 I bet you can't even handle half of the systems of an a320. What is it for to have system depth when the proper product for you is an mobile sim a320. So shut up and don't play yourself up, when you don't even know how to properly fly an airbus.

[@jakob8862]

@@windshearahead7012 No need to get deeper into this, as of the writing I can already tell you are for sure not an airliner pilot and no need to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about, because I can tell you for sure that I certainly know the features a lot better and don't tell me that I have no study level aircraft in my hanger I have been flying FSLabs for over 2 years and I didn't spawn engines started on the runway like you probably did, what you don't know probably is called a c+d with CPDLC and PDC and ATSU and a lot other things like that. So go on and start learning to land a mobile plane before writing like you were a professionell pilot.

[@jakob8862]

@@windshearahead7012 Oh trust me I certainly know what I'm talking. Don't try to tell me a thing about buses go on and learn to properly fly like a real pilot would do.

[@bxnny15_76]

but the aerosoft Airbus has much better VC textures then the FSLABS

[@tvflight7858]

No, It just have more contrast. FSL and Aerosoft, have the same texture size. I agree with you, that aerosoft have better colours, but P3D is a flight simulator. The purpose of flight simulation, is realism, not apperance.

[@petyahaha]

I don't know have anyone can say that aerosoft has better textures. I don't know what it is about them exactly, but they look rather like cardboard than metal to me.

[@raulaubele7240]

with all due respect, are you speaking seriously? FSL has the highly superior textures in absolutely every aspect, respecting every detail of the real airplane, what are you referring when you affirm that aerosoft presents better textures than the FSL model? you saw for example the reflection of the instruments in the console or the sector of circuits breakers or the dimmeable lights, etc etc etc. etc etc... the summary is three words, outstanding awesome superb...

[@tvflight7858]

yeah, but the aerosoft has better colours. But I agree with you of course

[@thalyssonwilliam5104]

Correct the texture on Virtual is very good.

[@ragegaming8572]

WTF.You haven't aligned the irs in aerosoft one and you are asking !!WHY!!

[@tvflight7858]

I did, what do you mean? I wasn't asking nobody.

[@fernandoip4737]

Because you have to introduce the geographical coordinates of your position(gate) first, on the MCDU Init Lat/Long. This information you can find it on jeppesen Airport chart. Then you must align the IRS from the MCDU option. Remember at this step you should have already rotated the 3 IR knobs to ON BAT from the overhead panel.👍🏼

[@tvflight7858]

I know that! In real aircraft you can use the plan mode on the navigation display even when the IRS haven't aligned yet. FSL simulates that, aerosoft doesn't

[@lukedunkley8451]

@@tvflight7858 I'm an A320 pilot, and until at least 1 IRS has aligned, nothing will show on the ND. This video is horrifically biased in my opinion.

[@tvflight7858]

@@lukedunkley8451 Im sorry

[@vizio2003]

You can use a tiller in the aerosoft a32x, It depends on your joystick and settings

[@azizc64]

I think its like comparing iFly vs pmdg 737

[@noel12397]

azizc64 yeah

[@DudeAwesomeBoyReal]

The Aerosoft doesn’t have malware...

[@tvflight7858]

This video was published in August 2017 and you are talking about something that happened around one month ago. But I kinda agree.

[@falconjet0186]

You simply can't compare the Aerosoft Airbus to FSLabs. FSLabs Airbus is in a completely different league.

[@0PageAccess]

lol

[@mk8master629]

Does anyone ever open the windows and pull ou the tray tables tho? Plus I can't see any difference in the landing performance. For what the Aerosoft was made for does its job fine.

[@jason.6000]

if you cut the engines in the aerosoft a320 you go up the overhead panel to the electric hyd pump and turn it on its the only way for it to be controlled as I've seen

[@tvflight7858]

It doesn't make any sense man. You cannot run electrical hydraulic pump without electric power. In real Airbus, there is something called RAT, (Ram Air Turbine) that makes it possible. In fsl it's well simulated.

[@terrainaheadpullup3092]

@@tvflight7858batteies output electric power

[@tvflight7858]

@@terrainaheadpullup3092 not enough

[@majoraviatior1611]

Fs labs is much better

[@a7medal3arabi38]

just to let you know the runway issue is due to your old airac cycle :) but still agree fslabs is much better and update your airac ;) but tbh i feel like interior textures for aerosoft is better especially if you added the HD cockpit textures that found in the Aerosoft form plus choosing dark VC from configuration. other than that FSlabs is better

[@tvflight7858]

But still, size of textures, is not a part of realism. I'm interested in flight instruments and handling simulation, and I don't care about textures. That's why I like fsl more.

[@catzpa5409]

Fsl has RAT, aerosoft Not ---> with RAT hydraulics are powered. Because that is Not in aerosoft= no Controll After Engines off

[@tvflight7858]

And that is what I wanted to show

[@uerguep4402]

You have to turn the APU on in the Aerosoft to controll the Aircraft After Engine Faliure

[@merto31]

people can say every thing about malware but aerosoft is what it is a simple toy ... people should stop comparing them as they are simply for a different audience... FSLABS has been a great tool for studying the aircraft almost as real as a levelD and even better than the VPT sessions given in an airline, for me its simply amazing and the prize some what high for flight simming market is relatively low for an unexisting product on the study level real pilot market. so for those who just want to hop into an airbus and have simple fun buy the aerosoft. if you care for detail and want systems to work as they should in real life to know how operating procedures (as real as it gets) buy the FSLabs

[@vitormaroso4064]

I don't need it, I have my FFa320 :)

[@1BassJohn]

I know this might seem like a shallow question considering you just mentioned the FSlabs being an amazing study-level airplane. How are the internal textures etc? One thing I can't fathom, is how some companies make these wonderful modules, yet the internals, particularly of the airbuses I've noticed, are really second-rate graphically. This is an important consideration for me, because it is imperative for an immersive experience of the aircraft. Love to hear your thoughts, as I'm ready to buy the FS labs :)

[@merto31]

the FSLabs looks amazing but you have to understand that it is heavy on FPS if you want it to look amazing, it has Ultra HD textures but i use the HD and get 25 - 30 FPS on my pc mine is not a high end i7 with an Nvidia 970 graphics card and 16 gb memory, but if you are looking more for eye candy and performance go for Aerosoft, but you won't get highly accurate immersion on how to use an airbus.. as the auto pilot logic and some other things do not work as they should as the real thing

[@simonsmedley5434]

FSLabs sure know how to take the piss when it comes to pricing!!!!

[@tvflight7858]

yeah, kinda does. I think that it's worth 99$ like the fsx version. I have no idea what do you pay for this 40$ extra.

[@theflyingman8598]

YOU TEsting in EPGD gdansk airport?

[@tvflight7858]

yes

[@theflyingman8598]

TV FLIGHT You polish?

[@tvflight7858]

yeap

[@tvflight7858]

widze, że ty też xdd

[@greathorton]

Some people were attracted by coffee on table, and flight crew lady on small display, so bought Aerosoft. Of course, the price point is also attractive. For myself, I only have Fslabs A320X and wish they will release new version for P3dv5 HF2.

[@zaabri283]

So which one do you like more? :P :D

[@tvflight7858]

fslabs

[@h4sanx1]

@@tvflight7858 idgf

[@joseisraelaraujoponte4296]

6:50 That is because you lost hydraulic pressure. If you turn on the electrical hydraulic pump and the PTU, the aircraft is still maneuverable

[@joseisraelaraujoponte4296]

By the way, ptu is on by default

[@mohamedabokar4384]

the electrical pump is always on auto so it should automatically already be on

[@charliealfa3208]

You know i would appreciate it if you were to show the 2 aircraft's respectfully and fairly since there are both aerosoft and fslabs fans watching the video

[@redspirrit6707]

6:50 of course you don't have control over the plane since there is now RAT included with the aerosoft (to keep the price low). You have to turn on the APU and then activate the blue hydraulic system manually

[@tvflight7858]

This is an old video

[@jeffcoward7467]

There is a RAT on the Aerosoft you just need to flick the switch.

[@GE90man]

Malware? Aerosoft X: no :( FS Labs: yes! :)

[@papafox75]

HELLO TV FLIGHT, it is possible to buy the FSLAB and install on my computer and my brother's laptop as well? so I could split the cost between us? thanks in advance for your answer

[@tvflight7858]

I haven't tested it. But I'll tell you my story. When I bought my new computer, I had to switch from the old one, to the new one. One of the problems I had, was installing the P3D. It said, that there is a problem with my licence. I contacted with P3D support for help. They told me, that my P3D was installed on a different computer, and it cannot be used again. That meanss, that the P3D can be used only on one computer, and when you want to switch to the different one, then you need to uninstall the P3D from your old computer. But unfortunately I don't know what about FSL. It's very likely that it will be the same as P3D. I'm sorry I couldn't help, but you can try to contact FSL support. They should tell you.

[@asianguyguitars1251]

im a proud owner of the FSLabs, now they have way better texture than Aerosoft. pop in the HB Texture for the cockpit, damn the FSLabs is the best A320 ever. However, i used to be an Aerosoft user too, yes there are quite a lot of stuffs they lack compared to the FSLabs. But this video, i think its a little bit biased to the FSLabs side. And i saw a lot of arguments in the comment sections. im just here to tell yall, whether or not yall hate both aircraft, the Aerobus and Labbus 320 are those planes that carries us from point A to B at the end of the day. For serious pilots, get the Labbus. For leisure flyers, the Aerobus works just perfect! Cheers guys be happy, dont fight!

[@AeroChris]

Both planes are good, but i prefer the aersoft one! But it's a personal thought....also if you listen at the fsalbs gpws it seems like they are "cutted"! In the aerosoft one they are much better! But again is just a personal tought!

[@tvflight7858]

Aerosoft has better sound I agree

[@superewing]

For many months I've heard that Fsl a320 is much better and it has this and that in contrast to Aerosoft... Of course, I comletely agree. It's understandable. But the only thing Fsl a320 doesn't have is decent FPS. That's being quite important for many people.

[@AFKMeister]

Unless your talking about it in p3dv4 because that totally relies on your pc

[@adrian_s4538]

Dobra, oglądając twoje filmy z A320 mam problem. Kupiłem P3D v4, teraz chcę kupić Dasha, ale bardzo mi się podoba A320 którego chce kupić po Dashu jak tylko na niego uzbieram. I teraz pytanie warto kupić Aerosoft jeśli latałem tylko na 737 i nie wiem czy A320 będzie mi się dobrze latało ? Fslabs ma strasznie wysoką cenę jaką jest 140$

[@tvflight7858]

Jeżeli jesteś "początkującym" w a320, i nie wiesz za wiele o nim, a chcesz go tylko poznać, ale nie zależy ci na drobnych detalach, to zdecydowanie Aerosoft. Ja kupiłem fslabsa tylko dlatego, że wiem o a320 prawie wszystko, i nie wyobrażam sobie, żebym nie latał na najrealistyczniejszym dodatku. Ale jeżeli latasz wieloma samolotami, a a320 to kolejny do kolekcji, to fslabs dla cb będzie wywalaniem pieniędzy w kosz.

[@tvflight7858]

mam nadzieję, że pomogłem :-)

[@adrian_s4538]

TV FLIGHT noo tak latałem 737 w xp11 bo tam był już, ale cały czas "ciągnie" mnie do a320, najpewniej kupie po dashu, a320 aerosoft i jak mi sie spodoba to pewnie wymienie na fslabs :)

[@tvflight7858]

wymienisz? xd też bym tak chciał :D Tylko pamiętaj, że na fslabs będziesz potrzebował dobry komputer. Dużo żre RAM-u

[@conceptone6895]

I admit fslabs looks good and has better system/ more realism etc. However you didn’t mention how fslabs is double the price of the aerosoft , performs with half the FPS and it’s filed contain malware and ruin your pc ?

[@tvflight7858]

I agree with you. The price is stupid and the optimization could be better. I have GTX 1060 ti with i7-7700k and 16GB of ram, and is still runs under 30 frames on medium settings. Since I switched to xp11 with FFa320 there is nothing that makes me go back to P3D.

[@Sm00thieK]

@@tvflight7858 Xplane is a joke

[@tvflight7858]

Have you ever flown in xp11 to say that?

[@conceptone6895]

TV FLIGHT personally I think plane is more realistic , however the airport sceneries are disappointing and vatsim model matching is poor (airplane either in the air or sunk in the ground ) if they made p3d sceneries on xplane and model matching better then I’d switch

[@ohthatplaneguy9347]

If u turn on elec pump during a dual engine failure for the aerosoft, u can still fly

[@tvflight7858]

But to turn on electric pump, you need electrick power! APU produces enough power to run electric pump, but it need some time to run. In the meantime RAT comes out, and gives you basic flight controls. In aerosoft it is not simulated, and without fuel, u don't have any flight controls.

[@ohthatplaneguy9347]

Thanks dude! Its true, APU takes sometime to start

[@tvflight7858]

Yes, it does. Keep in mind, that in real plane, RAT comes automatically and you don't lose flight controls.

[@tvflight7858]

comes out*

[@ohthatplaneguy9347]

TV FLIGHT Nice vid tho, good effort

[@siddharthkulkarni625]

FSL is the PMDG for airbus A320...absolute perfection

[@ehab772]

But poor textures

[@ehab772]

@Antonino how ?? Aerosoft A320 still have a good texture than fslabs

[@iamgp3313]

The stall warning in your aerosoft airbus isnt like mine. even the more realistic sound comes with me than with the other airbus

[@georgebarlowr]

Then its not a true comparison is it.

[@tvflight7858]

I have the newest version of the aerosoft, and the stall warning sounds like in C172 which is an issue. Why you think that this comparison is not true?

[@iamgp3313]

TV FLIGHT yeah i thing it is a bug because sometimes the stall warning was like in your video

[@martinmusiet9780]

8:03 don't get the skyhawk into this

[@tvflight7858]

what do you mean?

[@ΜανώληςΦιαγκουσάκης]

Are you serious? Of course you can control the aerosoft a320 after a dual engine loss. Engine loss equals no power. So you turn o the APU and most important the electical pump which is located at the upper right corner of he overhead panel. To get control of the aircraft you need to turn the electrical pump on.

[@tvflight7858]

have you heard anything about RAT? I guess that not. In real life you don't know what will happen, so you don't fly with apu on at all the time. When there is an 2 engine failure, you need to turn on the apu, to turn on the electric pump, but it takes a bit of time, so in aerosoft, you cannot control tha plane, before the apu turns on. In fsl, and real life, you have got something like RAT - small turbine, that uses air resistance, to produce you basic electronick sistems and flight controls, so even if you runout of fuel (no apu), you are sitll able, to glide to neerest airbport. That's how it work.

[@ΜανώληςΦιαγκουσάκης]

TV FLIGHT my friend you are misinformed. I know what is the rat. It's a ram air turbine and produces power. When you have lost all power then you turn on the rat. What you said about the electrical pump that it takes time, it's true . It does. And so it is in real life. Remember sully and the miracle on the Hudson? When they lost the engines, they started the apu and rat, and then the electrical pump. Until the electrical pump was on, the airplane was at the same course and a bit lower pitch, and uncontrollable. Then sully said "My aircraft" and then they began their turn.

[@tvflight7858]

Flight 1549, hit birds, that caused 2 engines failure. The rat turns on automatically, so that maintains blue hydraulic system, that allowed them to keep basic controls of an airplane. Them they turned on the apu. After it turned on, they had electrick pump, that gave them two others hydraulic sistems, so they had full flight controls. The problem of flight 1549 wasn't flight controls, cause there was no failure of them. The problem was, that they were too far from the airport, when they made the decision to make a wather landing. The plane WAS controllable.

[@ΜανώληςΦιαγκουσάκης]

TV FLIGHT the electrical pump is not necessary if the engines are running. I know exactly what happened and what was the problem of Cactus 1549. I'm just analysing a specific part of the flight. You get off topic telling me what happened and what was the problem. I already know that. Now the electrical pump was off and while they were waiting for it to turn on, the plane was uncontrollable. As soon as they saw that the electrical pump was on they began turning.

[@tvflight7858]

When there is RAT there is blue hydraulic system, so the plane is controllable. That's what I want to say.

[@dbaboun]

Make the same video but with the aerosoft a320 professional

[@tvflight7858]

But it still won't be on the same level as fslabs. I'm not gonna buy new addon that I'm never gonna use just for that reason.

[@dbaboun]

@@tvflight7858 but try it

[@tvflight7858]

try what?

[@dbaboun]

@@tvflight7858 make a video trying it and saying what it needs to be like fslabs

[@tvflight7858]

It's a different level. It won't be that good. It's like asking What does the Toyota need to do with the Prius to make it as good as Lamborghini

[@maiksir73]

The flight plan things are features for newbies. the automatic vspeeds and the zero fuel weight and cg can all be edited and the default values are there for beginners. also, the ILS29 is part of the navdata. so that has nothing to with the airbus itself. there are some missing features but most of it is not there because its too heavy on the cpu. imo a good trade to leave it out. what i rather dislike is that FSL steals files from AS..

[@tvflight7858]

why do you think, that the fsl steals files from as? proof that. Maybe I made a mistake in this ils 29. But that's small detail. The most important thing, is the handling simulation, and other important issues. You Don't need to agree with me. But if you think, that as is better, that's shouldn't be a reason, to dislike the video.

[@maiksir73]

Well, users noticed that there were actually some texture files of the VC implemented into the FSL that originally came from Aerosoft. So... FSL removed them quite quickly. I don't need to post an evidence here, just search for "piracy FSL" and you will find some more information. I agree with you on the handling point, and I'm also aware that FSL is more precise in certain aspects, especially regarding the autopilot and autothrottle, which is one of the reasons why you can run the Aerosoft A320 series smoothly even on a lower-end system. Now, the reason why I gave you a dislike is: 1. You obviously don't want to do a fair comparison here. You want to make the FSL look better than the Aerosoft product. 2. You misinterprete some of the Aerosoft features. For example, Aerosoft clearly states that the values that appear when you select a Flaps Config/Trim or ZFW/ZWCG are made for beginners. You absolutely do not need to make use of this feature if you don't want to. These values are there to be overwritten by more experienced users. 3. Most imporant thing: I don't know if you follow the Aerosoft forum (I don't think you do) but one of the things that have been said over a billion times is that Aerosoft Airbusses will always only simulate normal procedures and abnormal procedures partly. Emergency situations will never ever be part of an Aerosoft Airbus product. Therefore, it just makes absolutely no sense to compare these features with the FSL, which also simulates those stuff only poorly (sad but true). It's obvious that you also did this video for entertaining purposes, but then it should be funnier at least. This video is a quite boring mixture between comparison and making fun of the Aerosoft product.

[@vegas8454]

Not well done was not really a comparison more like a video against aerosofts airbus to make a good comparison you should be neutral to both

[@laratabaka6060]

you know that you’re comparing a plane for £40 to £70 one. calm down mate we all get the idea

[@tvflight7858]

this vid was made just for fun does it look like it's a serious comparison?

[@laratabaka6060]

@@tvflight7858 yeah it does mate hahaha

[@Fatman861]

What you can say about FPS between Aerosoft and FSLabs?

[@tvflight7858]

Well, you get significantly less frames when using fslabs. I guess that's obvious considering the quality and amount of stuff they put into this addon. Is it worth it? I don't know. It all depends on your priorities. Either you want good realism or just to have some fun.

[@farhadahmadi1840]

Complete Biased Thoughts. Try Looking into its Mechanism and Dynamics and actually use common sense that Aerosoft A320X was created ages before FSLabs Was a Thing. Like WTF Man. What Happened to the times when their were no good A320's and You went straight to Aerosoft. If there are Biased Thoughts on the A320 lets wait and see what we expect for the A330. `Compares that to Jar Designs`.... Not Impressed!

[@tvflight7858]

Yes, AS was before FSL, so that's why fsl is better. I just want to show differences between them. Is that bad?

[@0PageAccess]

alright video, but quite biased. Also I dont like the fact that with some of the comments defending the aerosoft, you go engage in a flame war, if someone does not understand some part of the video and maybe calls you dumb, that is no reason to escalate the situtation. Also whats up with 2:40, dont see anything wrong?

[@0PageAccess]

and also, I found some charts from 2016, I think there is ILS for rwy 29 there: fly.rocketroute.com/plates/adminview/EPGD_IAC_ILS_CAT_II_OR_LOC_RWY_29_(CAT_A_B_C_D).pdf?cmd=pdf&docid=400000000221830&icao=EPGD&_ga=2.237716480.1845437000.1525718152-699527179.1524495907

[@tvflight7858]

When I was on Full flight simulator half year ago, there was no ils to 29 at EPGD. Maybe they had outdated system, or something happened over last two years at this airport. I kinda trust them, but maybe this time they were wrong I don't really know. But that is not a big issue for me. Big issue is, that in Aerosoft addon you steer the aeroplane on the ground by rudder pedals. In fact, real Airbus is steered by Nose Wheel Steering, and Fslabs simulated it wery well. However you can steer Airbus by rudder pedals, but only by 6 degreese. That's why it's beeing used during takeoff and landing on the runway, but not on a taxiway. It doesn't look like a big thing, but It might confuse some people eg. begginers. That's what I mean at 2:31 and 2:40

[@tvflight7858]

Even if EPGD has ILS to 29, I cannot add any annotations to correct myself thanks to KZbin :D

[@TheThirteenshotsband]

Sorry but if you start and active electric controls button you can control aerosoft Airbus with no engines...

[@tvflight7858]

But in real life, (in fsl too) you need to get electricity in order to run electric hyd pump. it makes sense. APU takes some time to run, so that's where RAT comes in. How can you run electric hyd pump, when the engines are dead? I have never heard about something called "electric controls button" in a320.

[@luxuryva]

This is for p3d v3. What about the professional a320

[@tvflight7858]

what do you mean "the professional a320"

[@ednacsg5553]

It happens aerosoft a320 in engine failure stall because the nose was up

[@simutrains8723]

Nice video! I have a question: Is aerosoft extended compatible with p3d v4 ?

[@tvflight7858]

I'm not sure. I know, that the fsl does. On Aerosoft shop page of A320 / 21 and a319 / 18 it says, that it does works with fsxes and P3D v3. But they haven't mention about v4. Even if it does not work right now, I think it should fixed in next update soon.

[@tvflight7858]

thanks by the way :D

[@simutrains8723]

TV FLIGHT oh ok thanks for the reply I was quite confused 😂

[@tvflight7858]

To be honest, that is not a problem, comparing to P3D logic. Look at this no sense. The only difference between a P3D v3 and v4, is frames. like 5 more. There are same scenerys, textures and planes. But guess what? You need to pay again, if you wanna to upgrade your flight sim from 3 to 4! Let me know, what you think about it.

[@sergivan08]

FSL altitude callouts are unacceptably choppy.

[@emersonschmidt-ibns]

Once I flew Fslabs A320x I'm deep inside of learning things, and study, study and study. I stay more time studying then flying. And that's is pretty cool as FSLabs team has worked so hard to bring the enthusiastic pilots and why not saying, the real pilots as well use this wonderful piece fo software. AS PMDG for Boeing and FSLabs for Airbus I can assure for now we have the best simulation aircraft software ever done. The rest are good enough but not so deep immersion and proficience if you want that. But I have a huge complaint: FSLabs do not release their SDK that is horrible for the ones who want to develop and assemble ther own simulator. Hopefully one day for this release FSLabs, so please do it.

[@tvflight7858]

I'm afraid that you are asking a wrong person, I'm not fslabs. Maybe perhaps you could send them an email or post a comment on their forum or social medias? As to realism, I agree, FSlabs and PMDG are the best.

[@emersonschmidt-ibns]

@@tvflight7858 Hi there! I've already done that, sending an email to FSLabs asking for releasing their SDK. They will do it....someday. Here I just commented it.

[@benc5008]

At least aerosoft don’t have viruses and destroy my computer

[@2FlyCaptain]

Get over it dude, this comment proves you don't understand what actually happened.

[@sq8409]

Whatever the reason is, distributing virus that steals people's password is certainly illegal, it's far much worse than those who pirated their product IMO. I still don't like fslabs for this.

[@conedriver8169]

Any link for P3d V3.4?

[@patryk3537]

You cant control the plane because of the both engine failure, you have to turn the APU

[@tvflight7858]

No I do not have to. You turn the apu on, in order to gain access to air bleed system, which is required to turn the engines back on. I'm really interested what you had/have in mind. Please tell me, what would you do if you were a pilot, and you ran out of fuel? Take to consideration that apu doesn't have it's own fuel tank.

[@tvflight7858]

If you are confused, search for Ram Air Turbine (RAT) and read about it.

[@jeffcoward7467]

Miracle in the Hudson, both engines out, APU started instantly (argument over).

[@branimirfilovski8388]

Nice video! Subscribed!

[@tvflight7858]

thank you so much!

[@AirCatAviation]

Personally I like the real thing...

[@noel12397]

AirCat Aviation XD

[@alexandersorinsson4899]

Wait so FSlabs A320 is better than Aerosoft A320?

[@tvflight7858]

in my opinion yes, but that's just me.

[@bellovicsmate6078]

Bye the way aerosoft has table too you forgot to show in the video.

[@tvflight7858]

Yes, I know. Sorry :D.

[@vizio2003]

and the sun visor, and the emergency compass

[@joelangley7974]

At 6 minutes about the engine failure, Aerosoft got that part right

[@tvflight7858]

justify that

[@joelangley7974]

Nice video by the way. After watching it wish I would have bought the FSlabs one but there we are xD. I am not entirely sure but from what I have heard and read, the fly-by wire system incorporated into Airbus's means that if there is a complete power failure I think it makes it harder to fly the aircraft which is why the APU has to be activated, apologies if I am wrong but this is what I have heard.

[@tvflight7858]

You were pretty close, but it takes about a minute to start that APU right? And APU also requires fuel to run like a normal engines. Let's say you ran out of fuel and then what? That is one of the reasons why A320 is equipped with RAT (Ram Air Turbine). It uses the air resistance to spin like a normal propeller to produce some electric power. It's not as efficient as APU, but it's strong enough to power the blue hydraulic system that gives you basic flight controls. I don't really expect Aerosoft to simulate RAT and stuff related to it. I wanted to show kinda different problem. When you loose electric power in their addon, you can't use your hardware. I was moving the joystick, but the sidestick in a320 wasn't. It was falling like a rock from the sky.

[@joelangley7974]

TV FLIGHT oh ok, why did Aerosoft do this then?? Also, are you planning on doing any other add on comparisons? Quite enjoyed this video if it was not for the annoyance I felt knowing I should have bought the FSLabs one 😂😂

[@tvflight7858]

I have no idea why aerosoft did that. It might be because it's quite cheap addon compared to others and it's made it for normal flight simulation. They probably thought nobody would notice. I have recnetly switched to X Plane 11 and I use Flight Factor A320 instead. If i find some freetime, I can make a compareson video beetwen FF and FSL. But there is allready one. I made this video because nobody has ever compared FSL and Aerosoft so far.

[@javier_carrio]

6:00 ITS CALLED FLY BY WIREEE

[@zsolteditor]

turn on APU then u'll have control in Aerosoft as it should be.. lol

[@tvflight7858]

Yeah I know, but that's not how it works in real life! There is something called RAT, what doesn't exist in aerosoft frome some reason.

[@7cz4eweuawdc7]

2:08 is because your airac cycle is outdated you gotta update it BY YOURSELF dude

[@tvflight7858]

yes I know, but they should do that in the last update.

[@7cz4eweuawdc7]

TV FLIGHT they wont because it costs money to update these cycles. U gotta pay for it

[@tvflight7858]

And that's what I don't want to waste money for. In fsl there is new one

[@7cz4eweuawdc7]

U dont necessarily need to pay for it you can just get it from tpb for free

[@tvflight7858]

Thank you for this advice. I was comparing basic version without any plugins or addons so it is not needed anyway.

[@zulfiqaralikhurrum6911]

YO HOW DO YOU GET THAT MANY FPS!! With aerosoft my FPS decreases to 11

[@Jesus-ey7cu]

i guess, i3?

[@kevinsingh8035]

If you want less than one FPS then go with fslabs

[@qq7italy]

Yoy have to compare FSLabs A320 with the next 64bit Aerosoft A320

[@tvflight7858]

really? Aerosoft will never be on fsl level.

[@jacobhuber278]

Which one has the moving tiller?

[@tvflight7858]

Fslabs

[@jonasleiti5455]

Jacob Huber Aerosoft has a moving tiller as well! You need to turn it on in the rigtigt MCDU

[@tvflight7858]

@@jonasleiti5455 well they must have added that

[@jonasleiti5455]

TV FLIGHT i’m using a cracked aerosoft A320 version from 2014..

[@caremono98]

Did you bought the fs labs?

[@tvflight7858]

buy* Why are you asking?

[@caremono98]

Nothing , i wanna know because i saw this forums.flightsimlabs.com/index.php?/announcement/10-a320-x-drm-clarification/ , Then i dont know if i can trust that company , So IDk

[@tvflight7858]

Yeah, I heard about this fsl malware, and if I was a new customer I wouldnt buy this. But I still use P3D v3 so it is not a problem for me. I'm not sure, but they fixed that I think.

[@caremono98]

Huh , I dont know really they said that they have a new Installer but IDK really when a company do that you will trust?

[@lilkooly5150]

Lmao had to remove the number of dislikes yikes!

[@markbolatete5325]

Aerosoft is a toy... FSlabs A320X is a trainer...

[@markbolatete5325]

Been flying the real A320 for the past 17 years and I would say that the system on the FS Labs A320 is as real as it gets, thus made me to comment that its a trainer. This will make a flight simmer progress faster to the real thing as system wise he/she has the familiarity on the equipment. 140 is a fair amount as its worth every penny. I believe a serious flight simmer will never hesitate to cough out such an amount as it justifies the cost. And YES the difference is by far no comparison from other airbus pay wares.

[@speedbird1598]

I would rather call the Aerosoft a model. It's a good plane, but lacks a lot of features.

[@maiksir73]

i feel like both are toys compared to pmdgs planes honestly

[@tvflight7858]

But we are talking about A320 not PMTG 738

[@maiksir73]

We are talking about the level of realism. That means that we compare the Add-On to reality. And to me, both the FSL and the AS Airbusses feel like toys when you compare it to the real Bus. The PMDG NGX feels a lot more like an actual plane and it got almost every function that exists in reality.

[@kshivkumar434]

Pls suggest me how to get fslab a320

[@silvermyth2119]

OMG LOL! You put the mind blown guy in the video. Thanks for making part 2 of the comparison video. 👍 I can now see why the systems in the FSlabs A320X are superior over the Aerosoft A320.

[@tvflight7858]

thatks

[@SimPilotMika]

Does it have a built in checklist?

[@tvflight7858]

you mean fsl?

[@SimPilotMika]

TV FLIGHT no in the fmc of the aerosoft has an inbuilt automatic checklist

[@tvflight7858]

yes, aerosoft has.

[@SimPilotMika]

TV FLIGHT yes I know but does FSL have one?

[@tvflight7858]

nope. But I use one on my mobile phone

[@hansloyalitat9774]

Aerosoft cockpit looks way better, fs labs is ugly

[@blackwolf1475]

Irrelevant with the new professionnal version.

[@hcs4life21]

+FSX Air Virtual Is the professional version for FSLabs or Aerosoft?

[@blackwolf1475]

Jacob Adkins the Aerosoft.

[@hegantank6495]

@@blackwolf1475 it was in p3d v4 so that was the professional version

[@blackwolf1475]

Hegan Tank nope it was V3.4. And the new professional version almost matches the FSLabs.

[@hegantank6495]

@@blackwolf1475 ah my bad but from what ive seen and in my personal experience the fslavs is significantly better, theres no problem with the aerosoft but its simpler and better for new simmers whilst the fslabs is full study level closely accurate to the real thing with great features like the atsu

[@hhhaze]

Thanks watching 4

[@tvflight7858]

thanks for watching

[@hhhaze]

I know:D

[@edsonpqd3]

uma pergunta ,esse game vale realmente a pena e na sua opinião qual o melhor esse ou o xplane 11 em matéria de cenário e de aviões

[@tvflight7858]

?

[@edsonpqd3]

cara vale a pena o prepard 3d ou xplane é melhor na sua opinião ,e sim falando também das aeronaves que você mostrou no vídeo que realmente a comparação é muito boa

[@tvflight7858]

speak English

[@edsonpqd3]

cara is worth the prepar3d or x plane is better in your opinion, but speaking also of the aircraft you showed in the video that really the comparison is very good

[@edsonpqd3]

I'm sorry, I forgot that your language was English.

[@guysterges1382]

They are both very good, each one in its league as they are not playing in the same league.

[@tvflight7858]

true

[@captaineren544]

I have used Aerosoft only, but in my honest opinion, I would prefer Aerosoft rather than FSLabs or MalwareLabs. I don't dislike FSLabs just because of the malware scandal. I also don't like its textures, it doesn't represent the actual A320, it's not worth the money from my view and its cancer users (Fanboys that say bullshit about Aerosoft). But I like the fact that FSLabs simulates failures and systems in more detail. Aerosoft is fine for me. It also has all of the A320 family member aircraft. It's a good Airbus A320 addon for those people who don't have such high expectations and want to fly from A to B. For FSLabs, it's for those people who say "Dude, I wanna simulate all of these failures and systems in detail!" . So before you buy one of these, know what your expectations are. If someone wants to say something to me about this, PLEASE be honest. You respect my opinion and I respect yours. Thank you.

[@tvflight7858]

I fully agree with you. Honestly. Maybe I'm a fanboy of the fsl, but at least I have a good reason for it. You see, I've been flying aerosoft since I got P3D. It was my first addon. It taught me how to fly a320. sort of. It wasn't understanding what I'm doing or how stuff works. But when I switched to fsl, it has changed. I was surprised with the amount of differences between those two, even though it was just flying from point A to B at the beginning. Then I started doing more than that, and I finally understood how it works. It gives me a feeling that I'm actually flying an airplane, that there is a simulation of lifting force, that when both engines stop working, I can still glide and I don't fall like a rock from the sky like it is in the aerosoft. However, the price is absolutely ridiculous. It blows my mind that you have to pay 40$ extra just to get the same thing for the p3d. But it doesn't stop there. You can actually get a319 for another 40$! So if from some reason you want to fly a319 by fsl, you need to spend a total of 180$!

[@captaineren544]

By the way, I was referring to those guys but not to you by saying "You".

[@byt1mothy822]

On Friday I got the Fslabs😍😍

[@elliottd323]

It don’t matter the hot start cl605 is better then both

[@majoraviatior1611]

Nah fslabs is same level I’d say

[@samryan7447]

i will get the AeroSoft a320 for my p3d v4 its so long to wait

[@tvflight7858]

I'm still using v3.4 cause it's good.

[@yusufercan6768]

Fslabs has fps problems. and in the low settings inside look really bad. You have to run it in hight settings.. But Fslabs is better than aerosoft.

[@tvflight7858]

I haven't noticed any differences between full HD settings and 4K texture settings in the fsl. I have GTX 1060 Intel core i7-7700k 16gb ram memory and everything works fine. Actually fsl has better optimization than aerosoft. This "problem" with frames exist just because fslabs has much much more features and capabilities compared to aerosoft, that it really needs good computer to run. 5 years ago, Aerosoft was also a big problem to run, but today even the cheapest new computer can handle this. Yeah I agree that fslabs colours doesn't look that good as in the aerosoft, but I don't think, that this is an issue.

[@cherrykoolaid]

If feel like it was subjective, and he made it specially so the aerosoft was way worse than the fslabs. Like not showing the unfoldable table. At around 2:16 you were comparing the arc, plan etc. switches, when the fslabs had the irs aligned, but aerosoft didnt, so why compare it? At 2:10, i dont know if you need glasses, but there clearly is ils 29. And if there wasnt, then your AIRAC cycle was just outdated. The fslabs a320 is better than aerosoft, but you made it look way worse than aerosoft is. Especially in the price margin. FsLabs is nearly 3x as expensive as aerosoft. Lastly, Aerosoft has better cockpit textures, and sounds. This was like comparing ifly with pmdg, or fsx with fs2004.

[@tvflight7858]

At around 2:16 you can clearly see, that it says ir in align 1 min on ecam. It means that irs switches are turned to nav, but irs hasn't aligned yet (will align in 1 minute). In real live, data doesn't appear immediately. You can see the progress on both displays. And you do have an access to plan mode on nav display even before they align. Fsl simulates that, aerosoft doesn't. And please don't take this video seriously. I haven't spent a lot of time working on it. I didn't expect it's gonna get so popular cause by the time my average was under 500 views. I made it just for fun.

[@tvflight7858]

at 2:20 actually

[@terrainaheadpullup3092]

@@tvflight7858it said 5mins to align actually

[@DanieloSoberano]

Fslabs is much better in details and everything else but in my opinion, the shared cockpit of the aerosoft is more important than all these details together. I am not a aerosoft fan, i'm more like pmdg fan but those companies need to understand that the jetliners like Boeing and Airbus around there are complex and need more than a pilot to be operated in real life, so why in the simulator needs to be diferent. I know that must be really hard to built an airplane with a shared cockpit system but the TFDI 717 and the aerosoft A320 have proved that is not impossible, i whish more people think like me because im a pilot in real life and to be honest the high end addons need shared cockpit more than anything else otherwise we'll have to flying in emergency (first officer incapacitation) for ever.

[@tvflight7858]

I agree with you. But from my view, it's not that important, cause I don't have any friend, that knows something about flying. So I'm looking for something more realistic with more "things". But yeah, it would be nice, if fsl put this shared cockpit in next update like aerosoft did.

[@DanieloSoberano]

yeah, would be nice because that way you would be happy because the product is a fantastic a320 systems simulator and i'll would be happy because i have a lot of friend to shared the flight deck with me, anyway lets see what developers will bring for us in this 64 bits plataform, have good flights =).

[@c0r5e]

Flight gear a320 is better than aero soft in this case and it’s free

[@rafaelang2120]

pc specs?

[@tvflight7858]

cpu i7-7700k @4.6GHz gpu gtx 1060ti 6gb ram 16gb (8gb on vid) About average

[@rafaelang2120]

@@tvflight7858 I'm new to PC, just wanted to ask Sir if GT 1030 handle stable FPS with airbus addons? Thanks

[@tvflight7858]

​@@rafaelang2120 It really depends on what simulator you use. When it comes to what you see in this video, it is P3D with fslabs addon - it's quite heavy on CPU and ram memory, thus GPU is not as important as it is for simulators like MSFS2020. FSlabs is quite demanding for PCs, it's not well optimized. For P3D/FSX I'd recommend Aerosoft's A320 addon if you are looking for a realistic enough addon that will run with many FPS.

[@tvflight7858]

For Xplane 11 I'd recommend Toliss A320 series

[@tvflight7858]

I've tested many A320 addons for both P3D and Xplane11 so feel free to ask any questions 😁

[@Braidosss]

6:55 that's because the plane is Fly-by-wire LOL, learn your facts, FSLabs is wrong with that, when you lose both engines in an Airbus A320, you lose controls until you turn on APU xD

[@tvflight7858]

You don't know anything about aviation I see. Don't teach someone, who knows more than you. Do google research about RAT (Ram Air Turbine) Or ask anyone else if you don't believe me. There is many real pilots on KZbin, so feel free to ask them this question. Everyone will tell you the same thing. The plane without fuel, meaning no engines and apu, is still controlable. The RAT turns on automatickly and gives you blue hydraulick system, that gives you basic flight controls. The aerosoft was made to simulate only normal flight, not the emergency situations compering to fslabs. you can read this in the dokumentation of the addon. So generally, the fslabs is NOT wrong, how you sayed.

[@DiDileChinois]

Mate, the RAT deploys automatically.

[@tvflight7858]

yes, it does, but to make sure, you can press the button. Nothing will happen if you will do that.

[@Braidosss]

TV FLIGHT me making only 2 minecraft videos! dosent mean i don’t know shit! i do a variety of videos on my channel! but mainly focus on Flying! fucking worthless shit

[@captaintom8020]

I personally think judging on what someone plays determines their knowledge is ridiculous. Just cause someone plays Minecraft doesn’t mean they don’t know shit. Here I was about to subscribe but then I see you’re an asshat. Oh well. As you said one subscriber doesn’t matter. All I can say is blue skies.

[@mingovlog1181]

0:34 yes but 4.5 only

[@DK-ov2kw]

I love it !

[@tvflight7858]

Thanks!

[@stev9718]

5:30 look at !!! It's not max brakes 😑

[@tvflight7858]

"Full brakes" doesn't mean that I need to use max autobrake. By the way, in the aerosoft from some reason it's impossible to use max auto brakes it the air. In both examples, I pressed brake pedals. You can see the autobrake light disappears after the touchdown.

[@KCProductions2021]

TV FLIGHT you can’t select max auto brake in the FSL in the air either, it is airbus’ RTO autobrake

[@maseo_art_]

Meanwhile in X-Plane 11......rip

[@tvflight7858]

I don't think, that the xplane simulates better than fsl.

[@maseo_art_]

XP11 visuals are good tho

[@sageth3737]

tbh kinda biased review there mate

[@thecleener7245]

7:29 Aerosoft Admit it xD

[@tvflight7858]

hehehe

[@fernandosalas8589]

Don't sink, don't sink, don't sink

[@reaper378]

Stupid comparison really. I paid £37 for the Aerosoft Airbus and am very happy with it. What you have done here is compare a Mini with a Bentley then seem surprised when your Mini does not come equipped with a cooler for your Champagne.......

[@tvflight7858]

Yes, I took a Mini, showed what you get for that price tag, and then I took out my Bentley and showed off how much money I have lmao

[@tvflight7858]

No but seriously I know this vid is shit it's just that I was bored and this was the result

[@reaper378]

Wow talk about delayed response haha ! I was probably pissed when I wrote this and still haven’t worked out how to use the Aerosoft Bus properly yet lol !

[@tvflight7858]

@@reaper378 ye just over a year late lmao

[@tvflight7858]

sorry I didn't notice probably missed the notification

[@raulaubele7240]

I will never understand why people talk about the cost of a product, I prefer always wait and wait and wait until I get the money and then buy an excelent product like FSL A320 and not a TOY like ALL AEROSOFT planes, you are comparing a real virtual aircraft with an adult play station TOY, good video!! cheers!!.

[@tvflight7858]

The problem is, that people who don't know anything about planes, and want just to see general difference between b737 and a320 don't need to pay 140$ for something that they will use only few times. Aerosoft is not that bad. I was using this addon for a long time, and I need to say, that it's quite good. But compering to fsl, it really feels like cheep toy :D The problem is, that some people don't understand, that I just wanted to show the difference beetwen them, in way how they look like after you installed them... Anyway, thanks for understanding xd It's rare in this video.

[@whiplash7400]

You should have done it in p3d4, FSLABS a sure winner! Oh wait....

[@tvflight7858]

On 12 Aug 2017 there was no P3Dv4 and 3.4 was the newest as I remember. Even if not, it's paid, and I'm not gonna buy the P3D ones again, just for a new interface and 5 FPS more.

[@whiplash7400]

I was trying to incite that the aerosoft isnt in p3dv4, and so it wouldnt be a competition

[@tvflight7858]

Yes of course. That might be also one of disadvantages of aerosoft.

[@eno88]

Well this saved me a few bucks for the moment.. No Aerosoft for me.

[@tvflight7858]

But FSlabs is more expensive, way more expensive xd

[@eno88]

I did say for the moment =P . Oh hey, your thoughts on their malware DRM debacle?

[@tvflight7858]

I don't care, I have an old version :D. I'm not on time when it comes to FSlabs, so I can't tell have they already removed it, but people keep buying this addon, and nothing happens, so I wouldn't be afraid.

[@andrewb__0791]

What a biased video, seems that you put sh** on aerosoft and praise fs lab, fs lab is awesome, we know, but aerosoft is also a very good product, trough the years especially with Airbus family PRO and the fantastic A330 has grown a lot. This video is not updated with the latest version of aerosofts product, it's about the AirbusX, now try with Airbus pro, only for my curiosity. P.s i would have change the title with "FS LAB IS BETTER THAN AEROSOFT"