This video was demonetized by KZbin after manual review without any explanation as to why. The conclusion we must assume is that KZbin clearly doesn’t want to promote videos talking about military history or events like the Hunger Winter (is KZbin Denialist?). For this reason, I am 100% reliant on my Patreons for support, who really are allowing videos like this to be made. Thank you! All questions are from Patreons donating $5 or more on my Patreon - www.patreon.com/TIKhistory Please consider supporting me and allow this channel to continue. Dutch strikes gripped the country in response to Arnhem being evacuated. This was the excuse used by the Germans to cut food and supplies to the Netherlands. The Hunger Winter was the result. It seems that some blame the Allies for not advancing into the Netherlands quicker to relieve them from the hunger. But Allied strategy was focused on knocking the Germans out of the war, which would then solve the starvation issue by itself. Was this a right strategy? Could the Allies have done more to help the Dutch? And I’m curious to hear your thoughts on the board front vs narrow front strategy, and whether you think either was right or wrong. There are clearly flaws to both. But which was the better strategy? And, once again, who’s really to blame for how Market Garden turned out? Let me know in the comments! *Selected Bibliography / Sources* (I have more books on the Battle of Arnhem and Operation Market Garden, but these were the most relevant to this particular discussion) Beevor, A. “Arnhem: The Battle for the Bridges.” Penguin Books, 2018. Ambrose, S. "Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest." Simon & Schuster, Kindle 2001. Citino, R. “The Wehrmacht's Last Stand: The German Campaigns of 1944-1945.” University of Kansas, 2017. Eisenhower, D. "Crusade in Europe." Doubleday, Kindle 1948. Hunt, V. "Blood in the Forest: The End of the Second World War in the Courland Pocket." Helion & Company, 2017. Middlebrook, M. “Arnhem 1944: The Airborne Battle, 17-29 September.” 2009. Montgomery, B. "The Memoirs of Field-Marshal Montgomery." Pan & Sword Military, 2014. Neillands, R. “The Battle for the Rhine 1944.” Kindle, 2014. Internet sources - www.pegasusarchive.org/arnhem/RepPegasus.htm www.pegasusarchive.org/arnhem/depth_aftermath.htm Full list of all my WW2 and related books can be found here docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/114GiK85MPs0v4GKm0izPj3DL2CrlJUdAantx5GQUKn8/edit?usp=sharing Thanks for watching! Bye for now!
@yathusanthulasi5 жыл бұрын
Not pinned
@yathusanthulasi5 жыл бұрын
And what is next weeks video
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Pinned now. And next week, no idea. I'm trying to figure out if I can do the first Courland video next week, but I'm not sure I can. It's close, but probably not quite that close. But we'll see...
@Sir.suspicious5 жыл бұрын
Sad to see KZbin being a jerk again, they never cease to amaze
@AD-ji9ci5 жыл бұрын
KZbin should be ashamed of themselves, this is happening more and more often to excellent channels.
@antcorke44853 жыл бұрын
Dad was wounded by shellfire near to Elst on 15/10/44. He was attached to 130 brigade, 43rd Wessex Div. He’s 98 this year and still remembers a lot about his time.
@edt8535 Жыл бұрын
May God bless Dad!!
@TheKamperfoelie Жыл бұрын
Thank him please for his actions! We Dutch are grateful to all Allies.
@oldgitsknowstuff5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, a very informative video. I will show this to friend of mine who's a 97 year old Arnhem veteran who's attending the 75th anniversary at this moment. Respects to them all.
@lyndoncmp57513 жыл бұрын
Montgomery actually had an alternative plan to Market Garden on the 9th/10th September. This was for a paratroop drop at Walcheren Island to clear the Scheldt, but General Brereton of First Allied Airborne Army flat out rejected this alternative proposal and decided on Market Garden instead. Montgomery had zero jurisdiction to decide airborne operations. Brereton and Eisenhower had the say so.
@Rusty_Gold85Ай бұрын
And that would be due to the flooded Schweldt would have drowned too many para's
@panzerraven41355 жыл бұрын
On behalf of a Dutchman thank you so much for sharing this. After this The German high command punished the Dutch hard.
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
No worries, Market Garden is one of my favourite battles, and the causes and effects of it are really interesting. Once day I hope to visit the area.
@unofficialfuture31205 жыл бұрын
Great video thank you - too often the Hunger Winter is overlooked - some of my cousins were born with holes in their hearts attributed to the malnutrition suffered by their mother as a child during that winter in Amsterdam. Her family survived by eating tulip bulbs. The stakes for a successful outcome of Market Garden were so high for everyone.
@bavtie15 жыл бұрын
Thankfully my family either had farmer friends or owned a bakery, so they themselves didn't suffer as much as many others.
@roodborstkalf96645 жыл бұрын
It was very bad. In the month of February 1945 around 1500 people died of starvation in the city of The Hague.
@rlosable5 жыл бұрын
I never heard about that many deserters from the US Army in 44! Could be an interesting topic in itself!!!
@DagarCoH5 жыл бұрын
An interesting read for that: historywithatwist.wordpress.com/2013/06/12/how-u-s-deserters-sowed-terror-in-world-war-ii-paris/ (dunno how accurate the source is though)
@TheHawkeye615 жыл бұрын
Yes! Fifteen thousand American deserters is what most “popped” out at me from this video. I had never heard anything remotely like this before!
@ur2c85 жыл бұрын
He failed to mention the rapes and the murders committed by US troops against French civilians.
@TheHawkeye615 жыл бұрын
ur2c8...Probably because that was a rare or non existent problem; severely punished when it did occur! May be best if you were to keep your Leftist, anti-American Bullsh!+ out of what was an honest discussion?!
@ComradeIsy5 жыл бұрын
@Robert Dougherty @ur2c8 Or maybe one could support his controversial claims with facts/historical evidence and the other with counterarguing instead of dismissing it as "leftist antiamerican bullshit", if it is supposed to be a honest discussion.
@snookums015 жыл бұрын
There is a man I know in Canberra Australia who has a "post Arnhem" story of his own. Jumped into Arnhem but failed to escape. Wounded and taken as a PoW, he tried to escape twice and ended up in a camp in Poland. Was freed by the Russians and, seeing he was able to drive, impressed him into their transport corp. In December in 1945, still driving for the Russians, he heard the war was over. News apparently travels very slowly in the Russian army it seems.
@dermotrooney95845 жыл бұрын
Nice one. Thanks for sharing. 👍
@steveseamans90485 жыл бұрын
so many personal stories to be told. Thank You, sir @@dermotrooney9584
@wr75035 жыл бұрын
A camp in Poland in 1944? There was no Poland in 1944. Poland reemerged as a country in 1945 - a Soviet satelite state this time round. During WW2 Germans occupied Poland, German government was the government in Warsaw or Cracow.
@macmcleod11885 жыл бұрын
@@wr7503 Well then he probably meant, "a camp which was in the geographical area which was called poland before and after the war as well as by many people during the war while it was under german control." The people in the camp at the time probably said it was in poland too because they were not going to let the germans tell them it was now germany.
@haroldfiedler65493 жыл бұрын
@@macmcleod1188 There hasn't been a real Poland for centuries if not longer. What you're calling Poland, post WWII Poland, was as much of an artificial state as the post WWII Poland. One thing you can say for sure, the "occupied" are now the "occupiers." Most of present day Poland is really occupied 🇩🇪 Germany.
@michaelyates59763 жыл бұрын
Excellent summary. I have often wondered what the aftermath was. Thank you.
@rjohnson16905 жыл бұрын
It would be great to see a piece on the 15,000 deserters spoken of in this video. It would also be interesting to see a piece on the German ports that held out for long periods of time. Thank you.
@BonnyJosman Жыл бұрын
Dunkerque never surrenderd till May ´45.
@adaw2d32225 жыл бұрын
What a treat to have you continue your Arnhem documentary a bit! And BTW, if you look at detailed maps of the scheldt. It looks a bit suicidal to attack there frontally. Maybe that's a good reason why they didn't want to do it.
@TheBlackbrrd5 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. I have heard a lot about Market Garden, but very little about what happened afterwards, so this video was really interesting.
@scottytoohotty85105 жыл бұрын
The delivery of food to the civilians in Holland began WAYYYY before the timeline you stated TIK, the prince of the Netherlands pleaded with IKE to come to an agreement with the German commander Johannes Blaskowitz, for a ceasefire to allow air drops of food. The USA name of the plan was called ‘operation chowhound’ the Brit’s/Canadians named their half of the operation, which name escapes me right now. However, the Prince of Holland managed to contact both Churchill AND FDR, to get an OK for the operation, and in return, got the cooperation of German forces under the command of Blaskowitz like I said earlier. Now, this occurred DURING HEAVY combat operations, and Blaskowitz agreed to a specific flight path where allied planes were not to be fired upon, as long as the allied food planes remained in this very specific air corridor, they would be safe from German anti aircraft fire, and fighter attacks. And true to his word (Blaskowitz) NO allied planes were lost to enemy fire during this humanitarian operation which delivered AT LEAST 11,000 tons of food. Only 3 planes were lost due to operational accidents..... IN ADDITION, because the air drops were still not sufficient to feed so many people? The Germans also allowed a convoy of 200 allied trucks (lorries) to deliver food behind German lines..... This cooperation from Blaskowitz likely had an effect on his acquittal on all 4 charges after the war at Nuremberg..... however, he committed suicide nonetheless in 1948 by throwing himself off a balcony on the way to the trial. Why he did this? Who knows, like I said, he would go on to be acquitted of the 4 charges in the High Command trial, after his death.....however, I HAVE read that he was possibly implicated in some war crimes, executions, civilian retaliatory measures against partisan attacks on the eastern front earlier in the war, this is likely his rationale for killing himself..... But yeah, I just thought I’d correct your timeline for the famine relief operations in Holland towards the end of the conflict. Other than that? Cheers, all the other info and opinions you presented sounded correct based on my own individual research and knowledge about operation market garden and it’s aftermath. Well done, and keep up the good work TIK! Cheers!
@dermotrooney95845 жыл бұрын
Nice one. Thanks for sharing. 👍
@Tuning34345 жыл бұрын
@Scott Natale I think you're searching for the name of operation Manna? Perfect name, in my opinion as they really where a godsend for the people living in the large cities of North and South-Holland. The area's more in the east / north had distinct advantage as being surrounded by more rural area's.
@fuzzydunlop79285 жыл бұрын
Blaskowitz is such an interesting figure - I wish he wrote a memoir before he offed himself.... or a fucking suicide note so we'd know why he did it. He's probably my 'favorite' German officer of the war, just because he disproves the lame "if I opposed the Nazis I would've been killed!" excuse many German officers used after the war - Blaskowitz opposed the Nazis directly several times.
@fuzzydunlop79285 жыл бұрын
@емза братот "most" - nein
@BoerChris5 жыл бұрын
Very well presented and thought-provoking video. Thank you.
@davidolie83925 жыл бұрын
Great job on this. When I read or hear the value of Market Garden questioned, part of my answer is that at least it spared the southern Netherlands from the Hunger Winter.
@FromaTwistedMind3 жыл бұрын
Great episode, greatly appreciated. I knew an old boy Fred Bennett (from Chichester) who had fought at Arnheim. He was in the main town & hidden by, in his own words "2 lovely girls...who hid me until the Dutch Resistance got me out". Fred was one of those who crossed the Rhine.
@stephenbirks64583 жыл бұрын
Thankyou for sharing you very informative video ! - My father fought for Caen -Eindhoven -Nijmagen - Dad has spoke of the war & Dad knew so much about things you know he had to be there ? - He was the most honest person I ever knew - So I never doubted any thing he told me ? But when Dad got started to get poorly - He agreed that when he came out of hospital - He would sit down with me and talk about his war years & After the war when he signed up for the British Control Commision - Andvlet me tape - His conversation ! - Joining the Control Commision I Think I was my Dads way to make amends for the destruction ! He had caused while fighting axis forces - That wonderful opportunity was snatched away from us ? - Because Dad never came home from hospital ? Many thanks SB British Isles
@Sir.suspicious5 жыл бұрын
The what happened after market garden question remembered me of the fight for S-Hertogenbosch, that would make a cool mini battlestrom video in the future
@danielfield25705 жыл бұрын
Oh boy, I love Monday’s now, thanks TIK
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
Happy to make Mondays that little bit better :)
@varovaro19675 жыл бұрын
I always found the info about this to be scarce, thank u. The channel is growing healthy!
@Paul9601EX5 жыл бұрын
Nice you finally learned the Zuiderzee is actually the IJsselmeer (since the ‘30) . I also noticed there was another big battle going on in the Netherlands. That was the allied offensive to the Maas, the battle at Overloon and Roermond, in the same period (October November 1944). Good video though. Thumbs up and go on :)
@secondagent59985 жыл бұрын
Thank you for highlighting this front after the big operation
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
No worries, I really enjoy talking about Operation Market Garden :)
@jefaus065 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see TIK cover the Battles surrounding the capture of Walcheren Island.
@avnrulz85875 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. One 'pick'; the U.S. flag you're using has 50 stars; it should only have 48, as the 50 star flag was adopted after the 1960 election.
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
Wow, thank you! I would never have realised that, so thanks for pointing it out
@bigapplebucky5 жыл бұрын
48 stars is correct for 1944 and up until July 4, 1959 when a star for Alaska was added. (49 stars) Another star was added July 4, 1960 recognizing the statehood of Hawaii. Alaska became a state Jan 3, 1959 and Hawaii August 21, 1959. Nothing to do with the 1960 election. I had to look up the exact dates, but recalled 50 states having been achieved before the 1960 election. Very interesting video. Thanks. My father in law was Dutch and served in the Dutch merchant marine. Was in at least one convoy to Murmansk. He wound up working for the New York Dutch Naval attache's office. His relatives were very bitter about the Nazis when I met some of them as late as the 1970's.
@Ensign_Nemo5 жыл бұрын
The 49 star flag - 7x7 stars - was used for only one year. A few Hawaiians fly it as a cheeky way to thumb their nose at the other 49 states. BTW, that's why the old TV series (and the recent remake) "Hawaii Five-O" got their name - Hawaii was the 50th state to be admitted to the Union.
@lovablesnowman5 жыл бұрын
@@TheImperatorKnight literally unwatchable
@WhiteCamry5 жыл бұрын
The 50-star flag was formally adopted July 4, 1960. The election was November 8, 1960
@mahlapropyzm91805 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this, I too have wondered what happened after the Paras surrendered. It seems too much of history is dominated by glorious battles, won or lost, and not enough on what happened next.
@rolandfelice61985 жыл бұрын
Thanks TIK for this vides. I'd wondered about this question myself for quite some time.
@bikerchefray5 жыл бұрын
As always your videos on Arnhem was very interesting. I once left another comment regarding this battle. My father took part in the fighting as a member of 3 Para. He was wounded and captured by the German Paras and, after spending time in their hospital he, and several others from 1st Airborne Div. were being moved back to a POW camp when for some reason they were forced to divert and the only place that could hold them for a time was Belson. Also, after the war my father, while still in the army, happened to meet up with one of the guys that had the task of burying the bodies at Belson with bulldozers. So, just one of the untold tales of somebody that fought in this battle.
@jimscott17173 жыл бұрын
My father fought at Arnhem, he swam the Rhine to escape from the encirclement at Oosterbeek. He made his way back to Britain and was returned to his unit (Royal Artillery) with whom he fought till the end of the war. He was a good man but suffered with what we now now as PTSD. On his way out of Arnhem he was in a house that was strafed, he couldn't sleep inside for months afterwards. I wish I knew more about his experiences but he couldn't or wouldn't talk about. Even watching the Alan Ladd film about the battle which used to be shown every year gave him nightmares.
@thomaschildress3602 жыл бұрын
I just watched/listened to this discussion. About 6 times already. Thanks for the info, very good. Love your technique of giving us facts when you know them and when opinions are given , you are clear that is IS an opinion. I just got a copy of the 1974 "The World At War" video(s) and have watched episode 19, Pincers. It starts with Operation Market-Garden, with interviews with General Horrocks and others. It really helps understand the whole situation coming from the horses-mouth. Again thank you for your knowledge and your time in making these vids.
@reinoutburgers42255 жыл бұрын
Although I know quit a bit about the battle of Arnhem it is always good to see your step-by-step map TIK. The battle comes alive and one can suddenly grasp how it unfolds. Good video again TIK, but I know that you know there has being much more fighting on 'The Island' between sept '44 and april '45. (Remember Dick Winters battle at the Dike at Driel/Heteren). The whole episode is worthwhile a separate video. As a matter of fact a Dutch director Bram van Workum is preparing to shoot a movie called Betuwe '44. TIK, although I am not able to patron support you yet (credit card issues) I would like to invite you to come to my hometown Arnhem and I will guide you, drive you around, feed you and make sure you get a decent bed to sleep in.
@dermotrooney95845 жыл бұрын
TIK on tour. That would be great.
@UnderBoss6485 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video, i hadn't heard about german frogmen, especially not of a mission to blow up the nijmegen bridge.
@nickdanger38022 жыл бұрын
10.26 'fortress' garrisons in the ports meant supplies had to be driven by truck from the Normandy beaches. Red Ball Express
@oranje19645 жыл бұрын
Good video. Couple of picks; A "Räumungkommando" is not about repossession but about clearing out an area of all possible valuables. its pronounced as "roymung" as it has an umlaut on the A. The town of "Ede" is pronounced as "Ayduh". "Zuiderzee" is pronounced as "Zowderzay". Good call on the "Seine..!! "Waho Mohammed" ..!!
@jemc42765 жыл бұрын
Awesome TIK. Brilliant video. Love these off the main battles analysis.
@Nerve_Check5 жыл бұрын
Hi, This video which acts as a nice conclusion to the battles of Arnhem. The Battle of the Scheldt by 1st Canadian Army is often forgotten in the North-West Europe campaign. For historians 70 years removed, it is hard to imagine how difficult the canal crossings were, or the flooded fields to cross, and the pillboxes dominating the passageways to overcome. The German army deliberately flooded the fields which ensured allied soldier could not dig in nor find cover. To add to the general misery of the situation was the cold as this operation was conducted in October and November. Thank you for this video and mentioning this campaign.
@mahlapropyzm91805 жыл бұрын
There are one or two documentaries on KZbin, but yes, it is often overlooked. Monty's diffidence caused a lot of problems at the front and he almost got fired for it.
@johnwhite25765 жыл бұрын
The valor of the Canadian divisions during 1944 cannot be exaggerated. They took on the dirty high casualty work at Caen and at the Schedlt. Other than elite (airborne, ranger, amour units) Canadians were the arguably best infantry troops under Ikes command that year. As for Monty, I had always been under the impression he was avoiding casualties as much as possible at this point. Given the truly dire British manpower shortages on western front at this time , a far less mobilized america that had fought for two less years , and not been blitzed, cant be too dismissive.
@douglasthompson27405 жыл бұрын
Good topic. One suggestion for improving it would be to have the place names in the narrative on the map (some were some weren't) and to have the map coincide with the narration more closely. I was having a bit of difficulty trying to follow a detailed narrative and visualize the detailed geography at a fast pace. I have a pretty good general geographical knowledge of the area but not enough to follow the narrative as well as I would have liked as it was being given. Take care. Doug
@raymondbristow400713 күн бұрын
A friend of mine, of the local branch of the Airborne Forces Association, now passed of course managed to evade capture for a period, then was captured. He once again managed to jump off the transport and made it back to the allied lines with assistance from the Dutch underground. After a brief spot of leave, which he cut short, he was unitless. As the Rhine Crossing was being finalised he asked to be sent to an Airborne Battery for the Rhine Crossing. I asked him why he wanted to switch Divisions, I got a typical Para response, "we never quite managed it at Arnhem, so I wanted to make up for that, and get the job done." Airborne, a breed of their very own. Trooper Bear
@davidscott5898 Жыл бұрын
Shelt campaign - I suggest reference to the memoir of the 52nd lowland division, it was trained for years as a mountain division for a campaign in Norway (that never happened), then had its heavy weapons removed to make it air portable to support the Arnhem operation and then finally went in to action in Flushing, flat land below sea level.
@derekpara5 жыл бұрын
My recently deceased friend served as a sapper in 1st SAS and told me whilst we were in Arnhem that he and three or four others had joined the Americans and dropped just outside Nijmegen to assist in removing demolitions on the bridge. He could name all the other sappers and recounted his actions with clarity I can find no official record of SAS involvement.
@callaertserik15784 жыл бұрын
@Cloud Burst 117 It was the Belgian SAS who was in the Arnhem area as pre-Ops-recon for the operation Market. All revealed in the book "Belgian SAS at Arnhem". arjanatwork3@gmail.com
@lufasumafalu5069 Жыл бұрын
lol what a crock of lies
@casparcoaster19363 жыл бұрын
this is such good shit, I watch all the WW2 docus, this is the most intellectural and historical stimulation, many tanx!!!!
@sloppydog4831 Жыл бұрын
Interesting. Thanks for doing this video. As a Market Garden aficiconado, I've never understood why it took so long for the Allies to liberate The Netherlands after the Operation.
@viarr28935 жыл бұрын
Howdy! Excellent conclusion video, but I'd love to hear more about what happens next. Perhaps a video on the engagements during the last months of 1944 between the end of Market Garden and the start of Wacht am Rhein; the fighting in and around Aachen in November and other occurrences leading up to the Ardennes counteroffensive?
@ronaldpatterson11773 жыл бұрын
My mother suffered, but survived the 1944 Dutch Hunger Winter in Rotterdam, and distinctly remembers eating Swedish White bread and butter dropped by the English at the end of the Hunger Winter. She said it was an unforgettable delight !
@billslocum98195 жыл бұрын
In the movie "A Bridge Too Far" we last see the man with the umbrella mortally wounded after the final surrender in Arnhem. So I'm surprised to learn he not only lived, but managed to getaway with a decent number of his comrades.
@peezebeuponyou37743 жыл бұрын
If you believe that film, you'll probably be in for a lot more surprises, tbf.
@jimmorris63952 жыл бұрын
Digby Tatham_Warter was portrayed as a bit of a pratt in the film. He was one of the bravest, and would use his military rational to inflict without flinching. After the war he moved to kenya where he was one of the first to open a bloodles safari where folk could actually study the animals. He died in 1993.
@nigep11 ай бұрын
Thanks for a Great video My father Fred Pearce was a sergeant in 1st Airborne Ox & Bucks defence platoon in trenches surrounding the 1st Airborne HQ at the Hartenstein hotel He was shot in the leg & taken prisoner of war for nine months until the end of the war He never spoke a word about Arnhem for 46 years except he once said he & other paras ate raw eggs from a farm when trying to evade capture from the Germans I have his name on a one page list of sergeants taken pow signed by Colonel Warrack & the date is 6 days after the official end of the battle Although you say fighting did continue for some time After dad died in 1990 I did lots of research & assumed the 6 days was because they hid from the Germans in the countryside I have learned so much from TIK history and amazed that on two occasions the Germans were ready to wipe all of Ist Airborne out completely because they refused to stop fighting but on the second occasion the poles were landing Thank you for an amazing video
@bittenamehiereinfugen37135 жыл бұрын
This division symbols could be a in a card game
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
You mean like Magic or Pokemon? That's an interesting thought...
@bittenamehiereinfugen37135 жыл бұрын
@@TheImperatorKnight I was thinking on something like a quartet. A new Pokemon or magic the gathering would be a bit too much ^^'
@davidolie83925 жыл бұрын
I think they look great, but I also think TIK should review his symbol for 1st Canadian Army at 8:54. It appears to show the 1st Canadian Armoured Infantry Division, which didn't exist. Harry Crerar's mug shot is correct.
@ZealotOfSteal5 жыл бұрын
@@TheImperatorKnight Oh man, imagine a WW2 military tactical card game. Kind of like the tabletop wargames, but with rules abstracted to the level of a card game.
@fulcrum29515 жыл бұрын
Go fish
@ur2c85 жыл бұрын
The Battle of Walcheren Island is well worth studying as it presented a number of novel difficulties for the attacking troops. It also featured the British 52nd (Lowland) Infantry Division, famous for having been trained in mountain warfare and airborne warfare, but finally sent to fight below sea level on the flooded polders around the Scheldt estuary.
@nickjung73945 жыл бұрын
ur2c8 I agree, but there isn't much info about it. My Uncle took part and was awarded the Dutch Bronze Cross.
@lyndoncmp57513 жыл бұрын
Imagine trying to get across the southern Netherlands later on in worse weather and with tougher German defences. Market Garden got to Nijmegen (where the British and Canadian advance into Germany in 1945 kicked off from) in less than 3 days. I suspect it would have taken far longer and with considerable killed and wounded in, say, November.
@Elmarby5 жыл бұрын
The point of the thrust northward would be to not just get the Scheldt area but to also put the port of Rotterdam in play, plus the German units in Holland. IMHO Market Garden was the best move to make given the logistical situation. It put two major ports within reach and would directly threaten the Ruhr.
@jduff593 жыл бұрын
This explains a lot about the characters in the film "Kelly's Heroes" which, although a comedy - had to be based on tale tales from the ETO in 44/45. Roving gangs of Allied soldiers et al.
@washingtonradio5 жыл бұрын
"An army fights on its stomach" - Napoleon; someone who had a problem with supplies. Monty seems to have never really studied logistics. One point I think everyone forgets is there is a tendency for offensives to out run their supplies and grind to a halt. If the defenders can still retreat they can wiggle off the hook and reset themselves.
@lyndoncmp57513 жыл бұрын
Montgomery was a master of logistics and supply. He was more savvy than any other commander in that aspect of war. He was simply told by SHAEF intel at the end of the second week in September 1944 that the Germans in front of him were down on their knees. That's why he immediately decided on a quick advance.
@MichaeloApC5 жыл бұрын
Pretty unknown part of history. Great vid!
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
Yes, a lot of the Market Garden books don't really mention it, and the details are sparse. It's a shame.
@Endremael4 жыл бұрын
Western front is always always a major success with no drawbacks whatsoever in those books. Wonder why, hmm
@steveschlickman12 жыл бұрын
I just watched this video with the intent of finding context for a memoir I am reading written by a member of A Company of the 506th regiment of the 101st Airborne Division, Private Donald R. Burgett. He jumped into Normandy and survived as an active member of the 101st through to the end of the war. His account of A Company's experience on the Island post Market Garden was complementary to the Band of Brothers Easy Company story but different and more harrowing. Your video, concentrates on the eastern end of the Island and does not fully address their defense of the western end around Opheusden against the entire 363d Volksgrenadier Division. So I recommend Burgett's memoir, which I have in three short volumes, Currahee, The Road to Arnhem and Seven Roads to Hell. I believe the memoir was originally published in the 60s and proclaims Burgett as the first enlisted man to write a history of the American Airborne. I am finding Burgett's memoir as riveting as Ambrose's Band of Brothers and related publications that added to Easy Company's history.
@davemac1197 Жыл бұрын
I also have his Arnhem and Bastogne volumes and found Don Burgett a reliable witness to events he was involved in, and I would say it's more reliable than some of Ambrose's work. Episode 4: Replacements of Band of Brothers is somewhat compromised in conflating two different actions at Opwetten and Nuenen into one battle. Episode 5: Crossroads is much better, thanks to Winters' detailed account of the 5 October action practically writing the script for them. My own research into the German units involved was greatly helped by his testimony that clearly shows he knows the difference between a Tiger II and a Panther tank when he sees them (they have very similar profiles), and helped identify the German units, because he described a "Royal Tiger" leading a column of Panthers at Opheusden. This also lent credibility to his later account of meeting a Tiger II face to face at Noville near Bastogne, when most historians doubt the vehicles were even used in the sector. Evidence the schwere Panzer-Abteilung 506 were in the Bastogne area are substantiated by a Tiger I wreck outside the town that had belonged to Panzer Kompanie 'Hummel' at Arnhem and then subsequently incorporated into s.Pz.Abt.506 as their 4.Kompanie for the Ardennes offensive, so I have no doubt Don was on the money. The Germans apparently used this tactic of having the heavy Tigers spearhead attacks by columns of divisional medium tanks on more than one occasion and this happened near Arnhem in support of the October 1944 attack by 363.Volksgrenadier-Division as well as the first attacks and by-passing of Bastogne at Noville in December by 2.Panzer-Division. There's also a video on KZbin of Don travelling to the Nijmegen 'island' with author Mark Bando to locate the famous orchard rest area in which Don participated in the battle with a battalion of 363.VGD that had penetrated the American lines and established a position nearby, so I'm across most of the locations described in Don's books and the Easy Company stories as well.
@josephcason50395 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video brother man.... didn’t know the Germans had frogmen... also not to nit pick a quality video I can’t remember the time stamp but I believe I saw a mistake when you were covering the escape in which Easy Co. assisted in... you had Easy Company 3 battalion 506th 101 the correct identifier should be Easy Company 2 Battalion 506th 101st.... if I am mistaken I apologize.... again amazing video
@tommelrose775 жыл бұрын
There is a few bits I'd add. Digby Tatham -Water was my great uncle and part of the story is that whilst he was waiting to organise the escape he was going around with a local and pretended to be defe and dum!
@philipcongdon4942 ай бұрын
An excellent appreciation worthy of the best.
@localbod5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting. A very thorough and informative presentation about the aftermath of operation Market Garden. I did learn a lot. I may well be wrong but I think that the mad colonel of Arhem's name is pronounced "doebee" like toby is, but with a D. I stand to be corrected.
@rankedpsiguy15 жыл бұрын
Beware of "Brother Ambrose". His books were written solely with profit in mind. Historically accurate facts were often sacrificed for sake of a good story - making the task of HBO mini-series writers easier. Check out "The Road to Arnhem" by Donald R. Burgett for an accurate description from an enlisted paratrooper's (A Company 506 PIR - 101st ABD) point of view.
@dermotrooney95845 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@bigwoody47044 жыл бұрын
You wrote the book on getting things wrong - you embellishments are all over the comment sections
@peezebeuponyou37743 жыл бұрын
Yes- a populist author of no real historical merit.
@milan1902915 жыл бұрын
Realy interesting video once again, though the Zuiderzee incident did take all the credibility out of the video ofcourse
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
Of course haha
@sorsocksfake5 жыл бұрын
What's a Zoiderzee? :) (congrats on some of the pronounciations by the way... but that 'ui' sound will ever elude you English types :) ).
@davemac11973 жыл бұрын
Couple of points. The German 363.Volksgrenadier-Division is located in the wrong place on the video map. It was not attached to II.SS-Panzerkorps in the Arnhem area (with 10.SS-Panzer, 9.Panzer and 116.Panzer-Divisions), it was subordinated to the newly arrived XII.SS-Armeekorps based in Ede, which controlled the newly reformed 363.Volksgrenadier-Division (an army infantry division reorganised with less manpower but more automatic weapons) from Germany, and the in situ Division von Tettau that controlled various training units under German Armed Forces Netherlands during the Airborne battle. 363.Volksgrenadier-Division, having arrived in Ede by train, was deployed across the Rijn to the west of Opheusden, and it was units from this Division that attacked the US 101st Airborne in the Opheusden area, while faint attacks like Oelker's SS training unit (from the SS NCO school) crossed in the Doorwerth area (between Renkum and Driel on the map) as described in the video. These feint attacks were to draw attention away from attacks by II.SS-Panzerkorps in the east that were hoped to retake the Nijmegen bridges. It was even hoped that if all these attacks succeeded, they would link up and clear all Allied forces on the 'island' between Arnhem and Nijmegen. It all came to nought because Allied units on the island were too strong. To avoid any confusion, the 9.Panzer-Division in this video is the army unit relocated to Holland from Aachen along with 116.Panzer-Division, and not its SS counterpart the 9.SS-Panzer-Division, which had been in the process of entraining for Siegen in Germany to be refitted when the Airborne attack took place. After the Airborne battle was over, it completed its move to Germany, leaving its sister division the 10.SS-Panzer-Division in Holland. The second point was that while the Germans controlled the civilian Dutch telephone system, there was another telephone system in the Province of Gelderland that the Germans were completely unaware of. This was an advanced internal network belonging to the PGEM electricity company that used communications cables on the electrical transmission lines running across the province. Since the southern half of Gelderland was in Allied hands and the northern part still in German hands, the Dutch resistance had a secure means of communication across the frontlines the Germans didn't even know existed. Interesting sidebar - one of the switchboards for this system was in a PGEM office building that had been occupied by the SD (the SS Security Service) in Arnhem. The Dutch resistence had to pose as PGEM workers (those with the necessary knowledge worked for the company anyway) to gain access to the building for 'regular maintenance' of 'essential equipment' in order to make their calls to Allied held Nijmegen.
@TheSpaceHamster3 жыл бұрын
That 19 minute mark series of photos during the Hunger Winter, wow. Sharp, painful. The image of the starving/crying infant...
@danielkelly13355 жыл бұрын
Could you make a video about the German panzerturm or tank turrets that were used as static emplacements in the Atlantic wall and on the eastern front thanks its one of those topics that very few information is available online
@dennis237625 күн бұрын
What a fubar! I did not know the whole picture and now I know a little more. Thank you.
@jebsails28375 жыл бұрын
This video answered my question as the film ABTF seemed to indicate a complete failure and subsequent withdrawal. Not surprised as to the treatment of the Dutch population. British citizenry on the Channel Islands (Jersey et al) were subjected to the same treatment. Had it not been for the Intl. Red Cross provisioning two shipments of food during that 44-45 winter the outcome would have been catastrophic. After Liberation the British found the Germans had squirreled away 5 years supply of food and sundries, once they were cut off from resupply with the fall of western France coast. Narragansett Bay.
@mannymenke35945 жыл бұрын
Great video! You may want to do a video on the battles of hells highway and overloon in fall 1944. Lots of amazing history that is not known by most historians or history enthusiasts
@bavtie15 жыл бұрын
Just recently went to the Overloon museum. Very nice place! Though I wish their presentation on the battle of Overloon and the surrounding areas was a little more thorough. Still well worth visiting!
@markrunnalls72152 жыл бұрын
Really great as ever cheers Lewis.. 👍
@bramvandenheuvel40495 жыл бұрын
Little correction: The Dutch "Zuiderzee" had been renamed "IJsselmeer" by this time, due to the completion of the "Afsluitdijk". Zee = sea and meer = lake. Because it was no longer in direct contact with the "Waddenzee" and/or the "Northsea", it turned from a sea into a lake, now named after the IJssel river (a side branch of the Rhine), that flows into this lake.
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
Correction? Yeah, keep watching the video. You'll understand when you see it
@rickbeniers6675 жыл бұрын
Bram van den Heuvel he points this out in the video
@bramvandenheuvel40495 жыл бұрын
@@TheImperatorKnight Sorry, I always watch your videos at double speed and that part, though I was specifically listening for it, must have slipped through...
@mahlapropyzm91805 жыл бұрын
It is surprising that the Aflsuitdijk went unmolested, I would have thought both sides might be tempted to destroy it.
@bramvandenheuvel40495 жыл бұрын
@@mahlapropyzm9180 I wouldn't know why anyone would want to destroy it. There wasn't any fighting near it. Besides, it would take some substantial efford to blow it up or dig a hole in, as it is much more sturdy than a bridge.
@sf140319525 жыл бұрын
Very good documentary ,
@RogueSabre5 жыл бұрын
Great video, thank u sir!
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it Jake!
@haroldfiedler65493 жыл бұрын
Monty's purpose for Market Garden was an allied spearhead all the way to Berlin and an end to the war by Christmas as crazy as that sounds. When Monty didn't get approval from Eisenhower, he threw a fit and Market Garden was the consolation prize. There was no consideration made in regards to the German controlled Scheldt estuary or all the islands along the way. Given the allied supply problems, it's so obvious the Scheldt should have been the objective and the opening up of the port of Antwerp.
@lyndoncmp57513 жыл бұрын
Actually Montgomery had an alternative plan for Market Garden, which was a paratroop drop at Walcheren Island to clear the Scheldt, but General Brereton of First Allied Airborne Army flat out rejected it and chose Market Garden instead. Eisenhowers broad front strategy was a disaster. It prolonged the war by months and caused the failures in the Lorraine, Hurtgen Forest, Operation Queen and the retreat in the Ardennes.
@L24-h8i5 жыл бұрын
I don't believe there was anything the Allies could've done after Arnhem to help the Dutch citizens, Hell's Highway is still a single road which is still being attacked, 3 German divisions are blocking an exhausted XXX Corps and they still have to deal with a very long supply line now extended by the operation. The Allied strategy was basically all they could do. I think the broad and narrow fronts both work well but in terms of getting across the Rhine the narrow front was probably the better option. If Market Garden succeeded then it would've denied the Germans a Army(the 15th) if the Allies crossed it, the 15th Army would be weakened by being cut off from Germany and losing any supplies it might've been getting(which might have been Montgomery's idea, take out a German army and secure entrances to Antwerp in one blow), they could try to escape across that road to the north that connects Southern and Northern Netherlands but that place is a bombers dream. It would of given the Allies the perfect location to bypass the Siegfried line which might've made it less difficult for the troops about to cross into Germany and the Rhine, might not have been an Operation Varsity if Market Garden succeeded. It seems like a chance worth taking. For who's to blame, I would say Gavin for not sending a larger force to the Nijmagen bridge.
@yathusanthulasi5 жыл бұрын
Why couldn't they retreat from the halls highway
@L24-h8i5 жыл бұрын
YathytheCanuck if you mean the Allies then that would be a terrible idea, not only would it be terrible on the troops moral but that would give the Germans the perfect opportunity to destroy an entire enemy Corps and 2 Airborne Divisions. Retreating down one road being chased by 4 German divisions, 3 of them panzers, plus any coming from the 15th German army and that's not including any divisions the Germans might send from the east, it would be the equivalent to a death sentence.
@yathusanthulasi5 жыл бұрын
@@L24-h8i ok I meant the allies and thanks for answering my question
@dermotrooney95845 жыл бұрын
@@yathusanthulasi Staying in place was pretty sound. The German counter attacks in the north played to allied strengths and (I think) caused more German casualties than the main Arnhem battle.
@nickjung7394Ай бұрын
It wasnt just the Canadians that took Antwerp. My Uncle. Badged Essex but with No4 Commando was awarded the Dutch Bronze Cross for his actions at Walcheren!
@NoFaithNoPain4 жыл бұрын
My surveying teacher from trent polytechnic 1982 was captured at Arnhem. He maintains he was the only man shot in rhe arse whilst advancing. He was sent to a pow camp and the germans had less food than they had and let him just walk out of the gates. After two days of no food he was forced to walk back in, get fed and wait to be liberated. Nobody cares by that time apparently but anly a month before the fighting was so bitter. I wish i could remember his name. A huge scotsman, probably and sadly passed by now.
@udeychowdhury25295 жыл бұрын
So good, once again thanks for your online scholarship
@martinsparks78605 жыл бұрын
Hello tik . I was wondering if you may be able to point me in the right direction on some research . My grandads brother was in the oxford and Buckinghamshire regiment and was in the first air drop of Parachuter's that came in an hour after the gliders landed at what is now known as Pegasus bridge . he died there and we thought for years he had died almost immediately on landing . it was only many years later , when my grandad went to France on one of the d-day anniversary's to find his head stone , did we find out he died on d-day + 9 and from speaking to a veteran who was there and knew Stanley , that they had been repulsing a German armoured assault on the right of the bridge when a stug assault gun crashed though a bush on the road where he and a friend where sat in a fox hole , turned towards them and blew them both up . I want to know more about what the paras did after the orne bridge when fighting purely as infantry . Thanks for your efforts and please concentrate on ww2 , it is the biggest event in human history after all . Martin
@lek12235 жыл бұрын
I believe the wide front approach was incorrect, simply put they did not have the supplies for it, they should be ready to adopt and use it at opportuny moments however, but not as a main strategy... obviously the americans believed it was wrong too as they later changed away from it. I do believe it is a massive error not to focus more on the coastal areas, they should have learned and seen the problems Rommel had in africa because he had not captured tobruk and should have seen they were in the same situation. Due to the coasts proximity to england the smaller ports should be enough to give supplies to a dedicated unit just focusing on the coast, thus getting enough supplies to keep going.
@nickjung73945 жыл бұрын
Yes, a 40 division attack through to Berlin would have finished the war earlier and would have prevented Russian occupation of Berlin and the unfortunate situation in Europe after the war. Roosevelt was hopelessly outclassed and out manoeuvred by Stalin.
@tiberiancostal13585 жыл бұрын
An old friend - long dead - was involved in the airlift of food for the Dutch civilians. He told me that some of the more humane (although in the situation I am not sure that word is well used) German officers got a message across that the bombers involved wouldn't be fired upon if they were flying with they weapons fully elevated to make it clear that they were not belligerent. Does anyone know more about this? He was there so it is a first hand account - pretty sure he would know if he was being shot at - but i struggle to reconcile this with the overall attitude to the Dutch displayed by the Wehrmacht at this time.
@davidmouser5965 жыл бұрын
The whole Sheldt situation was a cockup, everyone at the top knew it and no one wanted the blame. The only ones who had a clue as to its importance was the German command.
@lyndoncmp57513 жыл бұрын
But the Scheldt suceeded. In fact it was the only allied compaign of autumn 1944 to actually achieve its objectives, whereas the Lorraine, Hurtgen, Operation Queen etc all failed and with higher casualties.
@jumpmastermp21Ай бұрын
My Dad’s unit was attached to a British unit in North Africa or Anzio. He said their rations were horrible. He spoke of a fish paste, that was particularly horrible.
@colinmartin29213 жыл бұрын
I think that Montgomery, having failed to convince Ike of the merits of his single thrust plan, decided to take it on on his own, and force the issue, although Ike wrote later that he would not have allowed Monty to push on alone, and Antwerp was top priority.
@lyndoncmp57513 жыл бұрын
Montys single thrust plan did still include US 1st and 3rd armies sticking alongside his 21st Army group. So even though it was a, single thrust it would still have been hundreds of miles wide involving 4 armies. Montgomery just didn't want to waste men and resources in the Lorraine, Alsace and southern Germany. He, rightly, wanted a single very powerful thrust in northern Germany, firstly against the Ruhr area and then to Berlin. Southern Germany was a side issue to him. Germanys strength was in the north.
@frankruisch85894 жыл бұрын
Awesome thank you. I actualy live in Renkum and it's awesome to see that you are spot on and the story is documented in such a educative way. May we never forget. I've got a nice drone/commemoration video of the famous Old Church in Oosterbeek that is really worth checking out on my channel. Thanks again for your work.
@TheMeritCoba5 жыл бұрын
I would like to add the Canadian offensive in the Spring of 1945 that liberated the east of the Netherlands. Prior to that the allies cleared the south of the Netherlands.
@opperturk1244 жыл бұрын
My grandmother who lives near Apeldoorn still remembers people coming and asking for food. They walked days to get a bag of potato's. My grandmother's parents had a farm so they werent lacking food. They gave these poor people pancakes with bacon and allowed them to sleep in the barn underneath horse blankets. Next morning they were gone, along with the blankets. They had thrown up all over the place. They werent used to proper food. My grandma is 85.
@JohnDoe-tx8lq5 жыл бұрын
Another really interesting video, were the Deserters ever punished? I'm amazed at the number of Deserters and the selling of military fuel. I can understand stealing food, but abandoning your fellow soldiers and actively denying desperately needed military resources from reaching your side must be as bad as spying behind enemy lines. Did any of them get punished, even executed?
@Idahoguy101575 жыл бұрын
Private Eddie Slovak was the only US Army soldier executed in WW2 for desertion. The rest who were charged were courts martialed for various offenses and punished.
@JohnDoe-tx8lq5 жыл бұрын
@@Idahoguy10157 - thank you for that, I guess after the experiences of the First World War, attitudes where very different about executing men in combat zones. I think if I'd seen my comrades killed at Arnhem and then heard about deserters making money from our supplies, I don't think I'd have been as forgiving.
@Idahoguy101575 жыл бұрын
John Doe .... Courts did order executions for desertions. Executions had to be approved by Eisenhower which he’d overturned. Slovak was repeatedly warned by Officers to change his defense and refused too. He was a victim of himself.
@stuglenn11124 жыл бұрын
Slovak brought it upon himself. He wrote a letter stating his plans to dessert and that he had no intention of fighting and would rather be in jail. He was given numerous opportunities to recant but refused to do so. Yes he was made an example.
@spudwesth4 жыл бұрын
Our Canadians had a hell of a time in the Scheldt. We could have used air support and amphibious tanks.... and more artillery. The fields were flooded. 40,000 Dutch people died of starvation.
@montymechanizedmarines5 жыл бұрын
Dear TIK - Thanks very much indeed. As inciteful and detailed, but also entertaining as ever. I had no idea the post-M.G. events were so convoluted and interesting, but the brutality against the Dutch was a sad shock to hear. Thanks again, Monty
@anthonyjones76093 жыл бұрын
There was indeed an Allied obsession (hyper-focus in fact) with the Rhine. I suspect that Monty's apparent lack of interest with clearing the Scheldt had to do with the extremely built-up nature of the geography, and Monty's possible disinterest in getting involved in a protracted urban campaign (c.f. Stalingrad) to me this partially explains the relative lack of interest in pushing through the rest of the Netherlands til close to the end of the war.
@MrHSwager5 жыл бұрын
How long did the Germans hold Dunkirk in 1944? Is there a lot written about it?
@fulcrum29515 жыл бұрын
The irony
@1996koke5 жыл бұрын
As far as I know, Hitler ordered his troops to stay in their "fortress" to force the allies into a bloody and long battle however the allies were not interested so they let some troops in a siege
@scottperry73113 жыл бұрын
It held out until the end of the war. The Germans had a significant forces in Dunkirk and were able to even counter attack the allies there late in the war. Check out Operation Blulcher: The Last German Attack in France, April 1945 kzbin.info/www/bejne/fInUmGBsjrCIbbM
@MrHSwager3 жыл бұрын
@@scottperry7311 That is fascinating, thank you for the info
@nickdanger38022 жыл бұрын
Missing Jerrie cans As I understand it. The US made little effort to collect and return empty cans for reuse.
@schaef23555 жыл бұрын
Wow back when colonels actually served on the front and didn’t just make appearances for morale
@DressedForDrowning5 жыл бұрын
A good question - and a good answer. :-D
@frodonifinger26285 жыл бұрын
I have been waiting on a chance to discuss Market Garden with you! Because you are wrong! Even Beevor misses it, disliking Montgommery. But he actually touches the reason in his book "Battle for Normandy" During the Normandy campaign Montgommery gets a lot of stick from the americans in particular for pussyfooting during the battle for Caen. To be fair the Brits saw the brunt of the german forces, as they were seen as the biggest danger, mainly as if Caen was taken, the road would be more or less open to Paris. And due to the fact that the americans was unexperienced and bogged down in the boccage in the Cotentan peninsula. The main reason for this pussyfooting was the simpe fact, that Montgommery was under direct order by Churchill not to bleed his troops, as he (Churchill) expected that western forces would have to fight Sovjet later on, and if Britain bleed to many troops, it would loose influence. This orders went well with Montgommery as he pr nature was a causious and meticulous planner. He was also known as a stickler for detail and once a plan was laid, he would stick to it come hell or high water. So why did he propose Market Garden? It was so unlike him at all. We know, he preferred a narrow front to the North, as he had put that idea forward more than once, but to propose an hugely ambitious plan with only a week to plan and execute it. That is so beyond his thinking! Many does claim, it was because he wanted to cross the Rhine before Patton, them having a race for glory. I have never seen anything stating that Montgommery was compeeting with Patton! In fact it was Patton compeeting with Montgommery. He was the one hating Montgommerys guts. Montgommery was obliviant to other generals being an arrogant ass as allways. You claim it was to incircle the german 15th army. I state, that you are all wrong on this! The reason for the rushed planning of Market Garden and the dismissal of going for the Shelte Estuary to free up Antwerp port was yet again .... CHURCHILL. This time is was not an order to perserve troops. The reason was the V2 Rocket! Germany had started launching V2 rockets by the 7th of september and by the 9th London was under V2 attack. Churchill did his most to keep the truth from his citizens, as he feared a public panic. The explosions was called gas pipe explosions. Very soon londoners called the V2's flying gas pipes. Churchill needed these attacks to stop here and now. Thus Montgommery was ordered to take the lauch sites in the area below Südersee in order to puch the V2's out of reach of London. This is why the planning was rushed, this is why they were so keen, that they disregarded dutch resistance reports of armor in the area. Montgommery was ordered to do so, to stop the Rockets hitting London. Hence the Early start at 17th of september. Churchilll suppressed the knowlegde of V2 Rocket attacks until 10 of october, as Hitler had announced their use on the 8th.
@frodonifinger26285 жыл бұрын
John Cornell If I remember correctly, this report caused Monty to suggest a different plan with some elements of the Market Garden operation but nowhere as ambitious. Eisenhover was dismissive of that proposal. Market Garden was rushed through after the 10th. I am sure, Eisenhower was informed of the urgency to stop the V2s both for the English fear of widespread panic and the direct threat to his supply bases in southern England. For no other reason would they have pressed home such ambitious operation in just 7 days. The reason why this never went public was first the absolute need for keeping the V2s from the public, and then later it would be demoralising to tell the public, that they failed in that particular objective. Later again there was no need to try to alter history. Any larger operation took either weeks after weeks or even months to put in place. But this was after only 7 days, and suggested and planned by a general that never would allow him self to gamble this hard. Only dire need can explain the rush, and the dire need was the V2 rocket launches.
@cassandrab40805 жыл бұрын
Frodo Nifinger: You're quite right that Monty entered Normandy with a mandate to conserve British manpower. Unable to capture Caen in the first day or two post invasion, he found himself facing the bulk of German forces, particularly panzer units. Monty would have been justified to conserve British manpower by shifting to a defensive strategy in the east. He could pin down the German units facing him, minimize casualties, while reducing pressure on American units in the west. Instead, Monty adopted a strategy of methodical direct assault across the city in a grueling house to house campaign -- thereby suffering over 50,500 Commonwealth casualties. It was a price Britain could not afford to pay. Caen exhausted British reserves. After that, replacements could only come from dismantling and combining existing units. Virtually all V-1's and V-2's were launched from the French coast. Rocket suppression might justify priority for a northern thrust, especially one that cleared the Scheldt. Market Garden wouldn't have a direct impact on the rocket campaign.
@frodonifinger26285 жыл бұрын
Cassandra B The V2 rocket first became operationel by 7th. of september 1944. By that time the French West coast was In Allied hands except for garrisons at major ports. V2 rocket was launched from mobile platforms in woods in the area south of Südersee and north of the Shelte estuary. Occupation of that area would push the V2 out of operational reach from both the staging area in southern England and London.
@Rusty_Gold855 жыл бұрын
The Canadians got a lot of troops shot up outside Caen versing SS Troops in the wet fields . I only just realised a while ago the US Landings at Normandy inevitably allowed a large sweeping movement across France which includes the Liberation of Paris .How fortunate ? A huge show in front of cameras opportunity . As it was there was a tussle who was to enter first , who paraded down the The Avenue des Champs-Élysées in front of the world
@cassandrab40805 жыл бұрын
@@frodonifinger2628 Precisely! Stopping V-2 launches would require an attack to the northwest, north of the Scheldt, not northeast toward Arnhem. It would require elimination of the German 15th Army, which defended the Scheldt and northwest Netherlands (Holland). Even after the capture of Nijmegen (20 Sept 1944), Breda (29 Oct) and Walcheren Island (6 Nov), clearing the area around Hague / Rotterdam was never really attempted.
@WarRaven384 жыл бұрын
One more question! Where were allied planes during MG couldnt they support Brits at Arnhem?
@frankvandergoes2983 жыл бұрын
Where were the Allied planes during MG, they were there supporting the ground troops including the 1st airborne div.
@garyhardison92653 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing
@nickdanger38022 жыл бұрын
11.10 How many civilian cars were there by that time?
@raymondbristow400713 күн бұрын
In my humble opinion, I would have had a little more prep time and demanded that the air drops were done to the Airborne time table and not the RAF. Two drops, first at night. Typhoons and Mosquito's for Airborne Artillery. Involve Combined Operations and the Canadians to Clear the Sheldt at the sametime as Market Garden. That would have forced the 15th Army to split its forces to attack Hells Highway, defend the Sheldt against the Canadians in the South and Royal Marines / Commandos attacking the Western approaches of the Sheldt.
@iVETAnsolini5 жыл бұрын
Tik, do you have a video on the falaise pocket-gap?
@TheImperatorKnight5 жыл бұрын
I do not at the moment. I'm working my way through the North African Campaign so I can go through Italy then Normandy, and then reach Falaise. Is a long-term strategy for the channel, but I hope it will pay off in the end.
@hansschonig24725 жыл бұрын
very good video
@Fuzzy_nutstein5 жыл бұрын
Still a patron and not going anywhere!
@billnotice99574 жыл бұрын
The photo of the starving baby will give me nightmares. @ 19:26 warning rough.