AGM-158 JASSM: America's Secret Stealthy Missile

The AGM-158 JASSM (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile) is A Large, Stealthy Long-Range Missile developed by Lockheed Martin for the United States Armed Forces. It is a large, stealthy long-range weapon with a 450-kg armor piercing warhead. It completed testing and entered service with the U.S. Air Force in 2009, and has entered foreign service in Australia, Finland, and Poland as of 2014. An extended range version of the missile, the AGM-158B JASSM-ER (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile-Extended Range), entered service in 2014. By September 2016, Lockheed Martin had delivered 2,000 total JASSMs comprising both variants to the USAF
Check out these top picks for you:
• MQ-9 REAPER: The Most ...
• This is America’s Bigg...
• This is America's C-RA...
🔔 Subscribe !
/ usmilitarynewsmn
🔖 OUR SOCIAL MEDIA!
---------------------------------------------
📲 Facebook ► / usnmil
🐦 Twitter ► / usmil_news
Thanks

[@gothgurlclique]

I work for Lockheed Martin the AGM-158 missiles are incredibly advance and are very accurate

[@stevenkidd6761]

Report to HR in the morning.

[@libertyforall5764]

@@stevenkidd6761 He will be called into the office in the morning.😁

[@whysoserious7553]

Good you're under Chinese radar

[@Wargamer_Asian]

Weh!? Really that missile technology of USA tottaly very late development and tottaly Behind by Chinese technology in term of Advance, no match, AGM-158 Mach 5, China DF-17 Mach 10, Russia ZIRCON Mach 7, hahaha 😆 😉 😀 And already exists in their weapons arsenal many years ago! While AGM-158 is not yet Mass production hahaha 😆 what happen!?

[@whysoserious7553]

@@Wargamer_Asian The world won't believe anything Chinese claims like they claimed covid 19 didn't originate from China lol

[@skimmer8774]

This AGM 158 is just a thing of beauty. Well worth the cost in my opinion.

[@kevinsierra482]

the more of them that are bought the lower the cost per unit

[@madmanhadaoopsie1859]

The b1 is such a beautiful aircraft

[@Stuff749]

Yep

[@KC_Smooth]

It looks like a spaceship.

[@madmanhadaoopsie1859]

@@KC_Smooth yes as well at the b2

[@noahater5785]

Heck, even if it’s called the big ugly fat fella for a reason, the B-52 Stratofortress is also a beast! 😍

[@stevenkidd6761]

I bet the Chinese and the Kult of Korea won't appreciate her as much as we do 😎

[@yoatemybeans2334]

9:14 that reaction is everything😂😂

[@UknowIam]

I once had the pleasure of seeing this missile up close. Took screen shot and enlarged to max.

[@josephpacchetti5997]

Interesting weapon and video, thanks Sam and U.S. Military News. 👍🇺🇲

[@PizzaBananaSplit]

Love yalls vid, keep it up mab

[@toddabbott781]

The AGM-158B has a range of 585 miles and the AGM-158B2 has a range of 1200 miles when it goes into production. This thing is a beast. There is an anti ship version of the B, but the extra sensors and sech reduce the range to about 350 miles. They can also carry the HiJENKS EMP warhead when that is out. It is like the CHAMP but smaller so it will fit in these smaller cruise missiles. The B-2 can hold 24 of these missiles each, so they could have launched 48 total in this attack if they had wanted to. Do to its size though the AGM-158 can also fit on an F-15, F16, F/A-18 and even externally on the F-22 and F-35 as well as the B-1, B-2, B-21, and B-52. They also have a box called the Rapid Dragon that can be air dropped from a C-130 that can hold 6 of these missiles or 9 missiles in the C-17 version. This needs no modifications to the craft and is simply air-deployed from the back of the plane like normal. The missile then release and head to their individual targets.

[@slimmyraw]

24 missiles, at 1.3m each, including the cost of aircraft, likely around 100m+ just to use these.

[@rationalpear1816]

Exactly. At 1200mi. The b-21 or b-2 serves no point. Conventional aircraft can drop these off without entering hostile airspace.

[@stevenkidd6761]

Did you get that typed before the video ended and said , fk it, I'm posting it?

[@demef758]

@@slimmyraw In the new era of multi-trillion dollar profligate spending, who cares if we burn through a billion bucks with one batch of missiles being dropped and sent on their separate ways? If we can't beat them with weapons, we can spend them to death...

[@noahater5785]

@@rationalpear1816 That’s not true, fully load these things up to the gills with these JASSMs and you can pull off stealthy hit and run attacks hopefully without being spotted.

[@sej_1726]

Hello from AIR FORCE 🇺🇦🤙🏻👌😉 SA-12 GLADIATOR! Thanks for support bro 😎 😊!

[@Bitchslapper316]

Tomahawks are underrated. They aren't stealth but they fly at like 20 meters above the ground so they're below most radar.

[@John-hu9qg]

Yet inferior to the Kalibir cruise missile.

[@Debaucherousgeek]

@@John-hu9qg Not at all. Just see the many kalibirs shot down over Ukraine on their way to hit and apartment block/school/hospital. Keep trying tovarich!!

[@alirazi3028]

Yeah, but they are definitely not below the radar of short-range air defense systems and these systems eat tomahawks for breakfast.

[@Bitchslapper316]

@@alirazi3028 Yeah short range defense systems can take them down pretty easily, even hand held things like stingers can. The thing is they have to know they are coming so if they don't detect the launch or see them on long range radar the reaction time plays the biggest role. Between detection time and identification it's often to late. They generally don't leave these systems active on auto because they would be shooting down their own aircraft and missiles. One example is during the gulf war a cruise missile was shot at the U.S.S Missouri and the Missouri started clouding the air with flak. One of the supporting destroyers had left it's phalanx on auto and it started spraying the flak in the air with bullets causing a bunch of hot depleted uranium to rain down on the decks of the Missouri.

[@Sinclair_USMC]

@@John-hu9qg Doubtful, considering they need western chips to make the Kalibr function. Even at 30 years old, with all the upgrades like 2 way data link, automated target tracking, loitering, 1000+ mile range and the ability to carry a W80 nucler warhead I would consider the old tomahawk a serious threat. Russia can't even keep their troops safe next door.

[@Basieeee]

When they start busting out stealth JASSM, sh*t has really hit the fan.

[@herptek]

A great way to produce conventional deterrence on stand off distances.

[@calebkimm325]

B1 quite a prepossessing machine. Beautiful aircraft.

[@davidwolf226]

What an impressive weapon.

[@KimetsuNoYaiba100]

It's a basic weapon. Nothing impressive about it.

[@ericclausen6772]

About time and you really need to make them go further

[@rosevitelli5814]

We have 1000miles 158C and from 50,000ft yeah 👍😁 we can definitely hit some Target's

[@michaelwk67]

That's one efficient and powerful missile

[@CHMichael]

The B1 would make the coolest private jet

[@blaineatkins2968]

Yeah.....still a beautiful aircraft😎

[@Chilly_Billy]

Good thing it wasn't called the Joint Integrated Stealthy Standoff Missile. The acronym would have been embarrassing.

[@yzzxxvv]

Amazing

[@DragonlordXV]

i like when you introduce those little lies among your report , 95% truth , 5% lies passes well and unoticed

[@dougtso4126]

I'm guessing we'll soon be seeing them badasses in real actions soon.

[@daniel_dumile]

The fact 25 of these fit inside a B1 highlights how huge that plane is

[@ghostmourn]

24 Jassms on a single B-one! Damn we need to build another non stealth bomber. Something simple, affordable, fast and reliable.

[@bryandepaepe5984]

Nowadays not being so stealthy can be used as an advantage by being bait with a bite. Get the enemy to focus on what they can barely see and use a 2nd total stealth group that's much closer and remaining unseen to target sites that light up to start tracking the barely seen 1st group which then can continue on with less resistance after the 2nd total stealth group takes out the active air defenses.

[@gregniel]

I want one!

[@greorith]

My favorite weapon to use on DCS World

[@mythoughts5615]

Gives a new meaning to rainin' hell.

[@111111111990]

GOD BLESS AMERICA !!!!!

[@huneidimohamed]

Those Batman caps are so cool

[@fingames3692]

Fun fact finland has the jassm as well

[@ChosenOne6666]

Sweet!!!!!1

[@HahaHaha-gq8ft]

From America with love

[@hadiyantojayadi4152]

Teknologi Legend Video Is W O W

[@noahater5785]

I assume the 2250 pound number is how much the entire missile weighs with both the propellant and the warhead? If that number is just for the warhead itself, that is one huge warhead! 😮

[@jamesorsby7553]

The warhead is most likely 1000 lbs.

[@jamesorsby7553]

@@ericclausen6772 That's what the narrator said in the video about this particular cruise missile's warhead. Tomahawk cruise missiles carry a 1000 lb warhead too, but they're not as stealthy as this one.

[@noahater5785]

@@ericclausen6772 So that probably means the missile itself minus warhead weighs about 1250 pounds fully loaded with propellant, +/- 50 pounds if the guidance system it uses adds a small amount of extra weight.

[@user-dq3jk9py4q]

Yes, the standard range AGM-158A, and extended range AGM-158B are 2250lbs total weight with 1000lbs warhead. However, there is an extreme range variant aka AGM-158B-2 That weighs 5000lbs with a 2000lbs warhead. It's a beast!

[@ElToronski]

​@@user-dq3jk9py4q the 158b2 is the jassm-xr? And at 5k lbs, wow its a big boi!

[@qtar1984]

They no longer need the B1 to launch these. They can now just yeet them out of the back of a cargo plane.

[@Tech.fam_5602]

Please make a video about space station

[@andrerothweiler9191]

US: let me test the missle UA: give me to test the missle US: let us test the missle

[@michaelstary3463]

We can see you comin' from... everywhere away.

[@soldier-boy969]

BEAUTY OF B1 B LANCER

[@kylen9954]

There's no such thing as overkill with Syria

[@stevenkidd6761]

Don't we have some very Christian people/groups in the world that should be over there blowing building up?

[@liibaanhd805]

Why is everyone is testing Weapons in Syria some goes to Ukraine

[@paulgreen7906]

JASSM.... can it provide free health care too? Now that would be a serious bang for the buck!

[@KingSpittusFactus]

Free healthcare cant kill russians

[@georgenzioki]

Us ammo and fuel depotsbare the ones on legitimate targets for strikes by others missiles would be really nice to get Us to this level of extinction

[@allanthomas332]

Look at those sailors faces when they saw missile launch they’re probably saying in their minds this one launch was a million words

[@troywalker8078]

I ordered two for my roof launcher on my truck.

[@user-rn9pq8tz1n]

In the blue sky and white clouds, the war eagle spreads its wings, paying tribute to the heroes who defended the motherland! 蓝天白云，战鹰展翅，向保卫祖国的英雄们致敬！ I love you ! 我爱你 !

[@JoeyBlogs007]

I had been thinking about a flapless design, by using manoeuvrable weights inside the missile's structure. Possibly also useful for a hypersonic missile design.

[@PissFighter]

Like inertial wheels on satellites?

[@user-uc4uz8zv5j]

المشاركات في عمليات الحرب العالمية وتشغيل النشاطات والعمل على المذيد والمذيد من غارات جوية وتوزيع غارات

[@xPetyr]

Hi guys, what is the name of that launcher/missile at 7:52?

[@jagdcent3403]

Bastion-P

[@xPetyr]

@@jagdcent3403 Thanks!

[@abuturab1589]

That is only ... so nice and friendly! A good boy...! 😱 👻😇😂

[@Daponics89]

can't deploy that armament without those jammers baby...

[@Wargamer_Asian]

This ERA is Hypersonic missile technology not that outdated missile technology of USA

[@ericclausen6772]

Take out their surface to air missile's first all of them

[@Kealen69]

This is what took out the Kerch Bridge, went off a bit early but still did a decent job

[@CellarDoorCS]

That explosion was massive - this missile is not capable of it by simple physics of the size of its warhead.

[@grantbriggs3777]

It's amazing how people think of building these weapons . Is this the same missile that can be used in the rapid dragon launcher

[@pekkapeltonen7945]

It is.

[@ElToronski]

This and its anti-ship version, lrasm

[@RaptorGP]

usa is the most agressive country through all the time. They started a huge number of coflicts all around the world.

[@ericclausen6772]

Stealth bombers baby

[@user-co8uy5rb2s]

Lethal!!!!

[@2coryman]

Ouch

[@user-xz1qt2ib5w]

🎉🎉🎉

[@paulhewson4600]

Its ashamed they knew months in advance when, where and how we were approaching the target.

[@ruthnoya8424]

Yes, because Syria was just full of "bad guys." Let me guess, you believe Iraq had WMDs and building 7 collapsed from a small fire.

[@joshua7999]

I think it was a message to Russia, to show them they won’t be able to intercept them if they can’t see them

[@ruyuchen2378]

It cost several million which more expensive than any target it intended to hit

[@csr4043]

If only Bone wasn't goldplated by The Pentagon... It could have been something amazing.

[@Theduckwebcomics]

So that attack probably cost about 30 to 50 million dollars or so?

[@johnhopkins6260]

19 JASSMs... does that qualify as a "swarm"? "...3 meters...": 9 feet; horseshoes, hand grenades and nukes... close 'nuff

[@miroslavUnimog]

👍

[@first-thoughtgiver-of-will2456]

It's terrible what's happened in Syria so much history and culture turned violent in a supposed age of understanding.

[@level1804]

I’m not against advanced weapons obviously, but why do the older aircraft like the B1B, F15, F16 and A10 , who were all to be cancelled, still hold up the fundamentals of US air power? There are many others who do those roles, but can they do them as well? In your face, have this, no quarter given. Boom. Technology might be interesting, but getting the job done is more important.

[@noahater5785]

Now just imagine how much more devastating these things would be if they had similarly sized nuclear warheads instead of conventional explosives for warheads, you could probably wipe an entire small-ish country completely off the face of the earth if that was the case!

[@AnhTrieu90]

You’re not supposed to say the quiet part out loud, buddy. 😅

[@ericclausen6772]

We alone have enough to destroy the world twice over and can't think of any reason we would need more than we already have

[@ruthnoya8424]

Why would you want to imagine that? The average person in the world just wants a job/career, a house and to provide for a family. All wars are banker wars, with bullies bullying the weaker countries (Syria, Iraq, Libya, etc). I'd rather nuke DC, wall st, Moscow, London, Frankfurt, Israel, Dubai, Riyadh, Beijing, Shanghai, etc.

[@ultragoldcoin8780]

Well we definitely have the capability to make mini nukes even smaller than that new missile variant seen in video. It's because of the nuclear agreement that they don't but we could outfit not all but a good majority of missiles with nuclear warheads..

[@karsonball2619]

I'll take 3.

[@Tyler.i.81]

Jazzumed it's load

[@jenuilmajulus5586]

👍👍👍

[@LuisMendoza-pp9qi]

Have they know about this.... the movie "Top Gun:Maverick" would've NEVER happened!!!

[@khukiyeyepthomi9977]

Long live America🇺🇸 🌏🐘🦄🦅🦁🐯👌💐✌👈👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@stevendegiorgio3143]

It would be really nice to equip them with a nuclear warhead.

[@rburnett6266]

The AGM 178 has a range of 760 miles...fyi

[@java1221]

LRASM

[@muhtasimsowmic8116]

And Basar Al Asad still on power 😂

[@ericclausen6772]

Your going to have them go even further by dropping them at altitude and an extended range

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

USAF should retire it's aging fleet of B-52 Stratofortress long range strategic bomber . . . and stick to upgrading the B-1M Lancer multi role strategic bomber . . . not to mention the B-2 Spirit stealth long range strategic bomber . . .

[@OroCover]

na'alatullah alazzaalimiin

[@Stuff749]

Is the missile hypersonic?

[@alexmoss3695]

no

[@ericbrammer2245]

Not even close; It doesn't need to be, IF IT Hides from Radar! Btw, the B-1, as Big as it is, shows-up, radar-image-wise, at about the size of a Red-Tail Hawk, from head-on (and wings swept-back), but, it's not "stealth" like an F-117, which is, head-on, Hummingbird-sized in radar return.

[@NikkoOrtiz1]

Its hilarious that all this is real.

[@erichvonmolder9310]

So why show this long range stealthy missile and how it is deployed? I'm just saying.

[@gautammisra2741]

Why USA doesn't have maritime bomber..? Because it is protected by huge pacific and atlantic ocean?

[@juhat5123]

UKRAINE NEED THESE WEAPONS

[@wolfvale7863]

These missles are the reason combat simulations of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would fail over 90% of the time. The invading fleet is sunk by stealth cruise missles.

[@ElToronski]

Rapid Dragon!

[@litchi4507]

How do you intend to launch these missiles without coming near to China's sea border?

[@wolfvale7863]

@litchi4507 The missles have ranges of 2,400 kilometers or 1,500 miles and did I mention they are stealth? They look smaller than 10cm² on RADAR. Chinese military knows this even if you do not. That is why they would "prefer" a peaceful solution because there is no workable military solution available to China.

[@litchi4507]

@@wolfvale7863 bull Its range is about 1,000 km or 600 miles.

[@wolfvale7863]

@litchi4507 If you say so. What is the range of Chinese waters again, 200 nautical miles?🤷‍♂️ Conducting autonomous targeting, relying on onboard targeting systems to independently acquire the target without the presence of prior, precision intelligence, or supporting services like Global Positioning Satellite navigation and data-links. These capabilities will enable positive target identification, precision engagement of moving ships, and establishment of initial target cueing in extremely hostile environments. The missile is designed with counter-countermeasures to evade hostile active defense systems. It can not be jammed, and it will evade anything you shoot at it. Did I mention it was stealth?

[@karlvonbahnhof6594]

I must say, l'm glad, that the oldest democracy, USA 🇺🇲, is the strongest, and our, Czech 🇨🇿 ally in NATO, we are on the right side, freedom is not free(It's a cliché but it's true) and our politicians deeply underestimated it, times are changing, we must and we do rearm from Soviet weapons to fully NATO, there's no other way about it! We are buying American helicopters, Swedish infantry vehicles, German Leopard 2 tanks and our new jet fighters will be most likely F35s

[@giant9101]

🇺🇦🤝🇨🇿🤝🇺🇲

[@icervoid]

The rusians are upset because US helps Ukraine in the Ukraine - rusia war ... but here rusia helps a country against US ...

[@georgevanwallendael3990]

China, say hello to my little friend 😗

[@dereckjtbear2175]

Weapons systems Ukraine can but dream about, Unfortunately. SLAVA UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 SLAVA UKRAINIANS 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

[@vvv9142]

эээээээээх, вот подсуетили бы Украине такого вооружения. это было бы идеально

[@user-ox5ny2ye2m]

Поддерживаю 🤝

[@goodbye.ml.goodbye]

❤ Зачем вы, Европейкая цивилизация,, позволили раковой опухоли расти?

[@renatobrito3455]

👑🇺🇲🇺🇦🤝🤝 2023 !

[@jayeshyeole3444]

India & United States Together Developed Heavy Stratejic Stealth Bomber & High Friquency Laser Weapons

[@ericclausen6772]

Why did you waste fuel to just take out two buildings cause Im sure they have more interesting targets then that and next time don't warn them and take out the minds that make the chemicals

[@Ola4family]

It’s usually who is inside the building that my government would send satan it self if they could, To rid the world of a snitch.

[@cali16m64]

b-1 is called "bone" becasue of the name........"b one" or shortened to "bone". Has nothing to do with shape. LOL

[@naomined9822]

right 😂

[@danielhabte7847]

Way to win world war

[@pablodixon5888]

Bien trabajo esa bomba manda la a ucraña gue use para la vida putin gue bien grasias

[@krstoevandrus5937]

don't you think hyper speed weapons are more powerful? USA is the 3rd behind russia, china. but indeep is the SAME as every other one who have NIL hyper speed weapons. russia/china could level you off before you could response.

[@piyumcharith]

Why Amarica is not making Nuclear weapons like Russia 😪😪😪

[@KingSpittusFactus]

They have way better nukes than russia