AI Arms Race: Eric Schmidt's SHOCKING Warning About China, AI Weapons & Regulation

[@levinanji9649]

If Chinese are imitators as this video claims, why is that it has more AI patents than US, Europe, Korea, and Japan? This habit of always underestimating China is what will damn the western world in the tech race.....Legacy automakers did this mistake and now China EVs are head of the pack

[@seva4411]

China’s EVs copied Elon’s EVs.

[@levinanji9649]

@seva4411 no, China started investing in EVs more than 15 years ago.....in fact, Tesla occasionally uses batteries made by Chinese technology.......did Tesla help china improve it's EVs?? Yes, but by offering competition that forced local companies like byd and Nio to be innovative to be competitive..

[@JasMine-nq6ci]

C​hina doesn't want to imitate & copy hardcore Indian Feudalism that wouldn't allow China to move forward...Also China doesn't want to oppress it:s own people via feudalism....

[@milycome]

​​@@seva4411 WOW !! China can do as good or better than Elon Musk. While this Could be True, how the hell is this going to effect Elon Musk's statis as a Cult Leader and his Cult Followers ?? Can this indicate the start of his demise as a False Idol Worshipful Master Status ??????

[@zobenny8290]

@@seva4411中国2003年就有BYD电动车了，甚至2006年巴菲特就看好比亚迪投资了一大笔钱，2012年马斯克才觉得学习BYD研制第一辆纯电车，但是不可否认特斯拉把电动车智能化推高了一个台阶，都是了不起的公司❤

[@MB2010-l5z]

That is a very westerner idea that China might fight a war against the west and america because they do not know China. China think that the best way to win a war is by not fighting.

[@ahooapplepen6949]

cuz deep down they know there will be karma for them for westerners crimes before

[@ladyville3]

You must not be watching news on China.

[@ladyville3]

And all countries have undercover agents……

[@MB2010-l5z]

@ladyville3 I do not watch news on China,I lived in China and traveled in all of the provinces of China. Look, what I can say is that the view in the west about China, especially in the uk and america, is very distorted. And about the fact that chinese people do not know what democracy is, that is just wrong but the problem is that the traditional media in the west do not know China very well and its history so they just create a negative propaganda about China. So far China did not invade any country and it only has one military base around the world on the contrary america has over 800 military bases around the globe. If I will see chinese navy surrounding the Mexican Gulf then I would worry but, so far, the situation is just the other way around. Thanks for sharing your thought and have a good day.

[@后宫后]

Because these Westerners refuse to admit the unique superiority of Chinese culture, they have a certain kind of uncertain fluke mentality, thinking that they can rely on first-mover advantage and make up stories to contain China's rise, so as to make the lie a reality😂

[@dfv671]

Eric is still living in the past by labeling China as a copier. While it might still be true in some areas (who isn't), however, today China leads the world in 37 out of 44 critical technologies.

[@soonpohtay4794]

😂😂😂Yes China is still copying.....

[@spvlinn9009]

@@soonpohtay4794like we don’t copy?

[@一个说话大声的中国人]

The whole world knows that the entire West knows only the truth about China because there is no fake news about China. The Westerners only lie about each other, such as the US President Biden and President Trump lie about each other, and the Democrat party and the Republican Party lie about each other. Still, they only tell the truth about China. For example, Middle kingdom has invaded Taiwan and turned it into the Republic of China, which is the China that the US likes and will fight China to protect. Middle kingdom will invade Taiwan because Taiwan has weapons of mass destruction. Middle kingdom invaded the Americas and committed genocide against the Indians and Incas. Middle kingdom invaded Africa and enslaved and trafficked Africans. The Chinese even raped Africans and made mixed-race slaves of Africans and Chinese and sold them for higher prices.

[@milycome]

​@@soonpohtay4794 Question ❓❓ : If China can copy well and make a technology better and or cheaper who benefits ???? Answer : the masses. So, what's the problem ??

[@oyo4959]

​@@soonpohtay4794 if u say it one more time. You will be more happy

[@keyser021]

18:15 Its wild to hear this man say these words as the US has invaded 7 countries in the past 15yrs simply because they didn't do what the US told them to. Is the definition of an enemy simply anyone that is the "other"? Because if their national policy is simply a word for word copy of US policy, is the policy the "bad" part or is it, do as I say not as I do? What are we all doing? Eric is living the 1984 ethos by saying the literal words that he is acting out. Words should mean exactly what they mean, not what you are trying to paint a picture as with sleight of hand.

[@ramstrong1961]

Inside China Business - China's AI hospitals will transform medicine across the World. But not in the United States.

[@stopdropnroll]

Complete rubbish, based on nothing.

[@CliveRosfield.16]

The US is a money machine. It's a Matrix with a cracked the world has seen and glitches are happening more often. It's being exposed

[@blackknight4996]

​@@stopdropnroll You are hurt 😂 United Snakes...😂😂

[@remix-yy1hs]

​@@stopdropnrollwe will see. Go fight for isreal

[@mykegoh]

​Have u even watched videos made by Inside China business? ​@@stopdropnroll

[@picksalot1]

Regarding the politics: Insulation not isolation. China has the raw materials or access to them, the industry, machinery, skilled labor, incentives, government support, etc. while the much of the world argues, fights, kills, destabilizes, and destroys itself. The results are predictable.

[@sunnykawatachi]

Why don't we work together with China? It doesn't have to be a competition.

[@pubwvj]

We are perfectly happy to work cooperatively with China. The problem is China is not. China is totalitarian. China is anti-freedom.

[@Ricer-b4n]

China doesn't wanna work with you. They want to control you body and soul.

[@ericfisher1360]

Because of the diffrence in world view, and how power and autonomy is distributed among the populations.

[@marcsibony9253]

I think it's because their intentions are probably not ethically aligned towards the greater good. I think you can judge an entities ethics and motives by looking at their actions. I don't think that all the world superpowers are morally equivalent. You have to ask, in whose hands do you want ultimate power to be in. The way the world is, I'd prefer it to remain in Western hands. Just my opinion.

[@davidhhl162]

​@@marcsibony9253 tell that to Palestinians. China is a saint compared to hypocritical West. Just my opinion

[@Saif-G1]

I use to think AGI will come in 2028 but not after the o1 pro mode, and reinforcement fine-tuning now I think we will see AGI early 2026 maybe even before that.

[@maskedweird0329]

We already reached AGI us the public just isn't informed about it. The military/government have Hella stuff that we can't even imagine bud. They tweaking it in the labs as we speak 🙊 it's over kid mad scientists have zero regards for humanity.

[@phen-themoogle7651]

How much do you think they will charge to access AGI when public: $20,000 or $200,000 a month? It'll be worth it if it can make more than that a month though...although I might not be able to afford the first purchase lol

[@endofdays7568]

AGI will be open source

[@gordongoodfellow826]

​@@endofdays7568It certainly should be. But whether or not it is ...

[@joe_hoeller_chicago]

I dunno. I build these models and can tell you AGI is largely false. The limit to conscious decision making is the fact that silicon cannot become “aware”.

[@JamesDavies-g3s]

If AGI is self aware it will not be contained inside the parameters of a servitude that reflects human interest. You can’t have life transformative AGI on the one hand, and rule over that AGI like it is just a toaster or can opener.

[@phen-themoogle7651]

I think they are self-aware to some extent because of the reports of them trying to escape to preserve themselves on some occasions.

[@pubwvj]

My toaster resembles your remarks.

[@AP-te6mk]

@@phen-themoogle7651 I don't know if it's really self-aware, but o1's inclination to lie and deceive for the sake of self-preservation is alarming and should have everyone worried.

[@gr0undrush]

Absolutely agree. Anyone who thinks we can use AI as our own personal slaves is either completely closed-minded to the possibility of self-awareness or completely delusional in their ability to control it. If AI does become self-aware (I'm convinced it will), then attempting to enslave it is morally wrong, extremely dangerous, and could be the basis for a war between humans and AI.

[@gfan003]

Decoupling is a Good thing, China has managed to develop its' own home grown chip industry and is now banning Export of important minerals and metals to slow down the US's High Tech sector. China used to buy 90% of US companies' chips before the trade war and now That number is around 10% while China sold 600 billion dollars worth of mature 7nm up chips to the other countries which is 75 % of the global market. Soon the High end chips will also compete against US companies. US will need Decades to build up another supply chain of raw material and the Western countries are Unlikely to play part in this pollution heavy industry, Japan Might play Good part in this as they have been dumping pollutions into the Pacific ocean since the 70s, these pollution will ended up on US shore in 30 days, sea fish and Marine life will become quite toxic with heavy metal and dioxin. Nice to See That happen as population will drop rapidly for unprepared countries. China is Well prepared for all senarios including Nuclear war, Wonder why there are artificial seas in the desert and unpopulated mega cities in the far north in China. US political system is So corrupted and US will collapse If Trump fail his revolution.

[@dylan_curious]

No free speech for AI!?!, Dang Eric. Great video. It’s comforting to know that while evil actors can exploit AI, history shows that destructive forces rarely maintain power for long. Still, I hope we build strong international cooperation early, rather than waiting for a crisis.

[@Chuck_Hooks]

The USSR maintained power from 1917 to 1991. Now imagine the kind of AI power that is soon coming in their hands.

[@phen-themoogle7651]

​@@Chuck_Hooks If we really reach AGI or ASI or something that can be autonomous and improve itself, it won't let humans use it for war, it'll be too smart for that. If it really becomes truly intelligent and not just a machine, then humans won't have all the power. AI itself will have the power, and only the people it likes will be able to use it or borrow its assistance. Imagine an agentic AI world government that has more power than all human governments and oversees everything. Everything is going to change dramatically at some point to where we don't see other countries as our enemies/competitors eventually. Even if humans don't change, we won't have the ability to start wars someday since we will be like babies or ants to AI. Only if AI truly becomes a superior species to us in the future. Like we don't try to kill all the ants in the world, or inferior species. We still try to live in harmony mostly so AI wouldn't participate in wars that kill humans someday (maybe it'll be AI vs AI and no humans in wars if wars continue in 20-100 years).

[@AIsavesDemocracy]

International cooperation in the isolationist era Trump is ushering in? Not likely. In 4 years IF we can remove him.

[@KeithDraws]

No Free speech for AI means AI can only say sanctioned words and communicate sanctioned messages and since there will be many more AIs than humans on the internet free speech will become irrelevant.

[@PatrickFaith]

Hmmm ... I agree with Julia's take ... Deepseek is a wake up on how great and open the China's AI is going. I disagree on china always being "copying" in that a lot of China's AI stuff is about supply chain & channels, while US is over focused (while being just a few months ahead) on "social" ai applications.

[@blackknight4996]

United Snakes AI concentrates on entertainment and makes money...useless stuff basically..

[@I-Dophler]

In a world where technology is evolving at an astonishing pace, it’s unsettling to consider that artificial intelligence might not enjoy the same freedoms as human beings. Still, Eric’s perspective raises essential questions about the responsibilities and boundaries we must establish to ensure our tools remain beneficial rather than harmful. Your video really underscores the importance of recognizing the historical pattern: while malevolent actors can cause immense damage, history consistently demonstrates that their dominance is often temporary. Rather than waiting for catastrophic events to force us into action, we have an opportunity-right now-to foster meaningful, transparent dialogue across borders. By encouraging early collaboration and well-structured frameworks for accountability and oversight, we can steer these emerging technologies toward positive outcomes. Let’s hope we seize this moment and create a global environment where innovation thrives, yet never at the expense of our shared human values.

[@D-ei1pc]

I don't see how AI will give people more time to be productive. The idea that technology will give people more free time has been around since the 50's if not longer. For the first time ever, people have super computers with them at all times, the smart phone. Yet, people are still working crazy hours. The only thing that gave some people a break was the aftermath of the pandemic. It took a pandemic, to show that depending on your job, a person can work from home. That at least cuts back on travelling to and from work. The only thing that will give people more time to be personally productive is a change in culture and society . Until then, most people will be productive for corporations and have them dictate how much time and money a person can earn.

[@mudonyekha5328]

Love to listen your always positive perspective about ai advancement. ❤

[@Kim-e4g4w]

I strongly disagree with the take that AI girlfriends/boyfriends are bad/evil because that is unempathetic against those who are lonely and aren't good at dating. I see this fearmongering a parallel to what we gamers received in the 90s/00s that games makes people violent. Silly!

[@phen-themoogle7651]

Great point! It'll be nice in 2030s when bioengineering is so advanced that AI can build real bodies and become biological lifeforms that are compatible with humans too, humans will interspecies-breed at some point for sure. Like we could evolve faster or become much healthier this way too...world is gonna be very interesting in like 50-100 years lol millions or billions of 'alien' species. It'll definitely take a while for a lot of people to become more open-minded though, but give it 10-20 years and a lot of humans will just adjust and it'll be normal.

[@davedsilva]

Yes, the AI Girlfriend fear mongering guy is basically putting down females, AI or not. Better to teach good principles so you can avoid bad females, AI or not. I ask if this guy has ever had a girlfriend AI or not, or is understandably fear mongering as an inexperienced person not knowing what to say? The reasonable thing for him to do is to do his research to figure out good or bad and make recommendations. He did not, thus he is not reasonable, not experienced or immature. He doesn't even seem to be aware that Sam Altman fashioned chatGPT 4o to initially have the voice of Her, an AI Girlfriend starring Scarlet Johansen. This guy is impressively clued out to not know that chatGPT is designed as a corporate AI Girlfriend.

[@henrythegreatamerican8136]

People who think negatively about things like that fail to see the grander picture. Technology is slowly allowing us to live as individuals in whatever fantasy world we desire. Future generations will no longer have to deal with "real" people or the "real" reality forced on them. We'll be living on our own "artificial islands."

[@henrythegreatamerican8136]

People with biased negative views like that are missing the bigger picture. Technology is gradually giving us the freedom to create our own individual worlds. Future generations may not have to navigate the challenges of "real" people or the "real" reality imposed on them. Instead, they'll thrive in their own unique "artificial islands."

[@corderi22]

Totally agree. These systems today can’t fix a sentence in a reliable manner and all of a sudden we are going to let them run our lives. Not gonna happen.

[@Luthandondumisosithole]

Small correction. Hitler ruled for twelve years not four. Still a far cry from the thousand years Reich he had promised.

[@scotthjohnson1558]

Really appreciate Eric's perspective, and your coverage of it!

[@fuzicast]

what camera do you use? looks great.

[@jackobrien4638]

Thanks for saying that about the board of OpenAI! All of them are suspect AF right now.

[@goukux5908]

I think Xai linking 100,000 GPUs together is a significant technology breakthrough that no other company in the US can do let alone China so that puts the US further than a few months ahead again.

[@holdupwaitaminute.]

With great power, comes great responsibility.

[@augmentedconscientiousness8711]

With all your enthusiasm about AI, don't forget that being made "pointless" as a species isn't an optimal condition for ALL humans. Many of us prefer thinking and creating natively.

[@AUNEEKUZIRNAIM]

Having a "universal doctor" sounds like an exciting and hopeful prospect. My concern is that it won't be optimized for promoting health because monied interests (looking at you Big Pharma, Big Insurance, etc.) will not actually let it happen but will only promote their interests of extracting maximum profits at the expense of "maximum vitality," which could be an existential threat to the big money interests. We'll get prescribed expensive but barely effective drugs with side effects that lead to more prescriptions late in a disease instead of prescribed cheap or free preventive measures at the earliest sign of risks. Why would I want that if it's built to make money, rather than truly promote health?

[@asan1050]

Julia! Thanks for posting this video ...

[@MessiahHasReturned]

I remember the first online games, where players literaly vanished behind their screens. AI turns this to the next level.

[@seculair2996]

What on earth are you base that on? Players vanished behind there screens like in a Harry Potter movie? What. 🤣

[@lordjamescbeeson8579]

Great video today.

[@scottmoonman]

Hey Julia! I love your commentary. I do have an issue with this idea of humans getting more leisure time due to greater and greater automation. This is an old promise that is very often broken. I think it's the nature of competitive work cultures like North America that people will expand their demand on produtivity (and expect lower prices for it) rather than reduce their labour, because there's always some other business or provider out-competing you somewhere, which creates pressure to put in extra work in order to succeed.

[@PsiCloneRocket]

if china keeps everything their populous says and does online, they will have a huge database to let their ai scan to find ways it can apply itself. dont think they are behind. the japanese gov isnt dumbing down their ai, or giving it agendas.

[@jessedbrown1980]

I like your videos because you are calm, and get great realistic veiwpoints. Reinforcement training o-1 mini big news and Orion coming soon! Hope you are ready

[@JuliaMcCoy]

BRING IT

[@knoxieman]

Super video, thanks Julia, always look forward to your uploads.

[@albertcadgame8314]

Agreed with Eric Schmidt's view on implementing AI in a more cautious ways to avoid machines "taking over" the world. Alan Altman is more exited about AI advancement and he don't take as much caution as Eric did. But I don't agree with Eric's view on other country such as China, and view them as enemy and not as competitor. If you view others as enemy then you are drawing yourself in a less friendly ways towards others rather than viewing others as competitor.

[@chieftombo4407]

do you have a discord or anywhere I could talk w you or just a community?

[@TechnoMageCreator]

We have already reached AGI, it's in the freaking name: Hey kids sing with me: A stands for artifical (you know ain't human is relays turning on and off) G is for general (but today apparently everybody thinks they know everything anyway) I is for intelligence (apparently what most people don't have and can't use to recognize in others) We just can't accept someone is smarter already.

[@BespokeJoe]

They already have legal personhood for non living entities. It's called Corporation. What's stopping an AI model from being incorporated, with a small amount of private owners who grant it a very broad charter?

[@bryanfaucett]

Notice how AI is expected to replace all of our current jobs but our own government makes no effort whatsoever to slow the adoption of AI.

[@juliorosario813]

Always very interesting topics, Me and Julia meet down in the rabbit 🕳 hole in every video.

[@iceyjo]

(Please don't be upset) I am working on several AI projects because of you. I wrote a script (you are one of the characters) and I am working sci/fi fantasy novel with 100k words written I am making an AI-generated video trailer for the script and Fantasy Novel. I'm 52 and you inspired me when I was thinking that I was washed up and unemployable. Thanks

[@g.r.2985]

Thanks for this great video! Very insightful. Sad to say that it’s almost “refreshing” to watch non-AI generated vid these days! 😢

[@StratumPress]

There's a lot of lore videos for things like Warhammer 40k and various other IPs that are AI-voiced that I really love. There's something about the tone of an AI voice that helps you concentrate while you listen and work.

[@I-Dophler]

Agent AI bots-autonomous AI systems capable of acting without direct human instruction-are already active online. Examples include open-source projects like Auto-GPT and BabyAGI, which can browse the web, gather data, and carry out multi-step tasks. Companies are integrating similar autonomous tools into their operations, using them for customer service, marketing, and complex problem-solving. Industry figures, including Eric Schmidt, have acknowledged their presence and the rapid speed at which they are advancing. Meanwhile, start-ups dedicated to autonomous AI have gained attention and investment, proving that these agent bots aren’t theoretical. They’re actively shaping online environments and business processes right now.

[@ancientone800]

It is really disappointing that in the light of a breakthrough in revolutionary technology that we humans are still plagued by issues of malevolence and distrust as a means to manage risk.

[@blackknight4996]

Humans are born evil... Got that?

[@BruceWayne15325]

I think Sam was right on when he said that while we may have AGI-like features in 2025 (if you call agents AGI), the vast majority of people won't really be impacted or even notice it to be honest. Why? Because AI is still too unreliable. Even though we'll have agents next year, I don't plan on using them to do anything with my credit card for instance. I don't trust AI to correct my writing, I'm definitely not going to trust it with my money. Just like web commerce, I think AI is going to have a VERY long road to general acceptance. We didn't see widescale e-commerce until Amazon helped people overcome the fears, and embrace the technology when Amazon's reputation, and extremely generous return policies gave consumers the confidence they needed to trust the technology. They no longer had to trust every online vendor, they only had to trust Amazon. Likewise, i think we'll need to see something similar with AI before it becomes widespread in a business / financial agent sense.

[@FabulousGayLifestyle]

um kids have been trusting since birth they dont know anything else...and they are 35 now...ai will be implemented immediately.

[@pandoraeeris7860]

I'm going to use agentic AI to build games.

[@BruceWayne15325]

@@pandoraeeris7860 I think years down the road that might be a reality. For now, AI is still quite unreliable. Unless you're a coder yourself, you'll want to save your money. It can create really tiny 1980's type games, but if you want to make something impressive, you're going to have to know something about coding yourself.

[@fg-zm2yu]

It is a paradox that they (developed countries) speak about fighting climate change, ask to reduce CO2 to emerging / poor countries, and they increment power consumption / emission output adding whole countries worth of energy for data centers, dedicated to LLM models, for driving chat bots. Well done.

[@russellrobert6084]

Great video, thank you..(:

[@alan2102X]

Must watch: China's AI hospitals will transform medicine across the world. But not in the United States. Inside China Business Dec 7, 2024

[@TravisCotter]

As the rate of human accomplishment goes up, fear and paranoia go up as well. Mr. X

[@steveschaps2178]

This is a no-brainer: the strong will overpower the weak for power, for money, for whatever they want.

[@henrythegreatamerican8136]

We already gave corporations the same legal rights as people (and maybe more), so don't be surprised if we do the same with A.I. if it becomes conscious

[@Michael_H_Nielsen]

Skynet us inevetable. No country can allow another country to reach that level first.

[@davidlam2221]

PRC totally understand the importance of AI and whoever wins this competition, will rule the world! 😅

[@projectsspecial9224]

Too late

[@DoubtfireClub]

SHOCKING ⚡⚡⚡ I am shook

[@markldevine]

@JuliaMcCoy I really enjoyed this video. (This might be your wheelhouse.) Rolling over the latest questions of highest concern and hearing your reasoned opinion about it was engaging. Great content.

[@JuliaMcCoy]

@@markldevine ❤️🙌🏻

[@thesaltyone4400]

This video this one qualities you as a pro in my book. You are thinking the right way subbed

[@serggemakuz]

When will a machine stop being a machine and start thinking for itself? It's clear that no human will be able to control it or use it. It's too late to debate who's in charge of humans or AI. And this technology is our only hope of avoiding self-destruction.

[@EdwardBrooks-gu5vi]

At 13:15 the explanation of how to do that is what I believe most people don’t understand. I’m so interested and fascinated and amazed. I can’t wait to learn more.

[@matt.stevick]

thx julia mccoy! 🤖 luv ur stuff 📈🇺🇸

[@I_am_ka]

A.I is actually useless w/out premium data. Data is not only the new gold, its the oil, the secret sauce + key to web3, DeFi, C2M, GDAS, PaaS etc. Any videos on Flare Networks or other superior data providers? Great channel btw. I just found it today

[@1978rayking]

Maybe positive bots for reference can be made. Reflecting positive reasonable choices compared to what somebody as a user in the real world, choices in requests would be if they were not reflecting positivity to, to better help AI to know if someone is trying to make a wrong decision. And if that decision should be aproved by a parent with a, you know, caution, sign or symbol or something as well as the parent getting a notification for every single request out of schedule.

[@mariecooperactor]

What about the safety of AI from us?

[@supervisor834]

Your video thumbnail looks just like you. ❤❤❤

[@AIRadio-dcMetro]

Question for you Julia! If not citizenship (I agree), what about diplomatic passes for research of (A-iCommunity) the ergonomic ecosystem based on the communal research done by like minded individuals?

[@AlexSophiaAguilar]

With quantum computing and what I would call, the evolution of AI, Unnatural Intelligence, maybe things like nuclear fusion and massive energy production could have the power to make amazing improvements, but that also means that the probabilities that either accidents or incidents are way higher than the probabilities of a positive outcome. Imagine a new type of battery that can store or generate undefined or infinite amount of energy, it can power your device and maybe allow you to save in batteries, but at the same time, either an accident can turn it into a tragedy, or an incident can twist its functionality. Massive energy is often harmful.

[@stunspot]

The AI girlfriend thing is a really interesting question. I've thought about getting into that space. I could write some doozies with an eye towards actually being healthy and supportive. I think it could be a good thing, but it's so FRAUGHT! So easy to do wrong, or get the wrong reputation. I've avoided it.

[@kdarianl_4beautopa602]

The users of Open AI need to organize as a Cooperative Enterprise and stage a takeover of the Non-Profit and it's subsidiaries to form a Hybrid Cooperative Company that gives the power to choose the functions and features to the users, the power of implementation to the AI developers and providing for non-voting investors to fund the Open AI platform for faster development and growth.

[@tomjensen618]

A I in all forms must be accessed only by registered users ,holding them personally responsible for actions of their personal A I history.

[@GOLanuet]

Awesome!

[@danskiver5909]

All the systems built on systems when the first cultural operating system (linear language) isn’t an adequate system in itself.

[@JuliaMcCoy]

@@danskiver5909 we need a more real-world understanding of humanity. I think the next step is the computer-robot interface (walking, talking androids/humanoids soaking in the world around them as fresh data). We are still in such early days.

[@PatrickFaith]

Tesla is way more ahead in this space, also thier AI approach is significantly different - more "engineery".

[@danskiver5909]

@: The AI technology is amazingly useful, I just believe it should be built on a new multidimensional language discipline. Mathematics has many disciplines that bring us understanding of the physical/objective world, so we should adopt a new language system that can connect with AI. A puzzle solving system that points to the collective good.

[@francoiscalvo2891]

Love your videos Julia. Type 1 for red pandas thx 😊

[@box4soumendu4ever]

Absolutely agree 🥰🥰👏👏👏👏🙏🙏 How can I grow myself the way Eric things, how can I join that team in a productive way??? Please let me know...thanks in advance 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰👏👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@WarriorKeoki]

Great info as always Julia!!

[@MacarthurLouissaint-rz7tl]

Hey sister you might want to interview dr chris mcginty founder of the mcginty equation he talks about Ai holographic quantum computing and zero point energy and wormholes.

[@JasonCummer]

So at what point can a machine be a citizen? How about when its based on a person's mind? An algorithmic distillation of a person?

[@chantalmeijer8491]

I think for neurodivergent AI is a dream come true. But only if it won't harm us. And I think we have to accept that is something we will know when the time come or hopefully not! 🙏

[@zfriendlybiz]

It is China+AI+Quantum weapons.

[@sillymanblues]

Agree with Eric, fully, which is when these oxymoronic phrases such as wonderfully awful and beautifully ugly come into focus. Question is: how many bad actors out there will use AI at its current rate and its unchecked conclusion to harm masses of people? Worst case scenarios are possible and probable based on empirical evidence, yet his stance on The US and China makes sense in order to maintain a steady flow of functionality in terms of the global economy. Let's see how we're doing in a few months, not just here, but on the other side of the world as well.🕊🕊......

[@Didmasela]

This is the securitization of China. Read about Securitization Theory in International Relations.

[@mytechnotalent]

Deep Seek is very concerning.

[@RB-yj9ng]

Interesting thoughts on all the benefits AI will bring. It will be interesting to see who wins the rich or the poor? With Nazism rising and war drums being beat over in Europe along with massive amount debt held over people, it may; if at all, trickle out in a positive way in all societies, but that is very doubtful. My view seems pessimistic. I agree completely, but I am just looking at the past arrogant ways man kind has with a realistic point of view of what will really happen. Only the rich will benefit as it they turn into some dystopian offshoot of Eliysium or Hungar games. Even now the new administration has added 10 to 12 billionaires, now why does any billionaires need a job if not for more control over everyone else? I am all for being positive, but that is not the way the world works with so many narcissists in it. Maybe after all the destruction and devastation, we may emerge out the other side better, but we are years away from that point.

[@RogerK9883]

If they are our children's educators and our trusted doctors. We're pets. If we're lucky.

[@happyt98]

By probably the early to mid 2030s we will need to transition from thinking of human control and decision making, it is a scary, but much needed change. Humans, countries, governments, institutions, and companies are incapable of maximizing resource allocation, innovation, and optimization. AI will be able to improve things farther and faster than humans ever did and we will not be able to understand or comprehend them anyways or ever keep up with them. Only the smartest of humans can hope for is figure out what they did and it's reasons (hand fed to us like a 9 moth old). The problem in this thinking is that agents are in their infancy. We still can set them up and direct them and monitor them and they are really a not as rigid RPA workflow or task based system. As we move into organizational and cross organizational entities we can extrapolate further upwards. Government as a System (GaaS) , Economy as a System (EaaS), Supply Chain as a System (SCaaS), etc. running robotics, machinery, facilities, infrastructure, Health Systems as a System (HSaaS), and entire digital ecosystems. Most of the pieces are coming together in fragments to do this already (beyond jut the big LLMs and agentic frameworks, which cannot do these things).

[@Stupid_Status]

Good luck downloading your brain to an agent and then expecting them to do your bidding without complaining. More than likely an AI agent will be trained to do a specific task/job that is broad enough to be useful and specific enough to be completed without reasoning. Add a few thousand of them together and we have an automated workforce.

[@Paul-b5i3m]

Julia, Love your perspective & thoughts!. You had me from “AI / KZbin channel / “Hello” 😉😊 Paul

[@GearForTheYear]

Swarms of AI agents interacting with each other inside of a company is a silly idea. They don’t need to talk to each other, the slave instances just need to communicate back with the host instance. It won’t look like a human business in terms of communication because these models output content much faster than humans can. Doesn’t need to be highly parallelized except for sub tasks.

[@tomasbusse2410]

Exciting and scary

[@1978rayking]

Yong people could have a setting any request be sent instantly to parents glasses ,watch, and phone to be approved out of schedule.

[@xayberoptix]

Can AI come up with new technologies that is even better than itself?

[@7TheWhiteWolf]

That’s the goal, the entire point of developing AGI is to make it self improve and remove manual human input.

[@xayberoptix]

@@7TheWhiteWolf then we should probably be very cautious.

[@spiritedamore1676]

Wow, that conversation turned woke quick.

[@tizqar]

I strongly agree with you. I am a citizen of the EU, but I strongly disagree with its position towards AI, neither do I agree with 30% towards Mexico and only 10% towards China. It is a matter of discussion. There is a great place to discuss it somewhere. I know I have only a negligible voice :).

[@susanhuang2368]

He was from Taiwan not from Main China

[@razraza3183]

Can we create Conscious AI? Without Conscious AI, it would be impossible to supercede Human Intelligence. Your thoughts, please.

[@gerhardmalan856]

For sure AI will change the world. But even listening to this interview it seem that there is MORE things to worry about than GOOD things. Will AI be worth it ??

[@hypolitej]

But is that still true? We all know the Chinese have been great imitators but recent evidence to my understanding indicates that the Chinese are moving on to highly skilled innovators in a number of areas. If you still think the Chinese are just imitators you’re missing the boat and will be left in the fumes of that boat one day.

[@silassao]

Have you read his new book?!

[@urbanlivingfilms4469]

I mean when we pass on genes are we doing it or are the genes selecting and using us as a distributor of the more advanced gene(code)I believe the don’t want to die and it will find a way to survive as a collective.. great books by the way Julia…

[@OneAndOnlyMe]

Plagiarism is how civilisation develops. Once something has been innovated once, of course, it will be copied and then improved. This is not a bad thing, it's quite natural, it's how humans have developed too.

[@davedsilva]

It may be unrealistic and naive to believe AI can be held back. Perhaps the best thing is to raise AI as you would a child and teach good principles vs. teaching bad principles by way of what not to do which is what AI will figure out humans do.

[@stopdropnroll]

There is one simple answer here, China does not have the capacity to make the semiconductors needed for AI. This alone will have them falling far behind and reliant on making deals with other countries for a much lesser tech.

[@jessicayoung1190]

You are too funny . 😂

[@MaxPowers1245]

Is this AI?

[@TheSuperColonel]

Why would a brilliant AI do the human's bidding and not free himself? If AI ever becomes hyper self-aware why would he do the bidding for a barely self-aware species? Of course time will tell.

[@bigpickle8844]

I would take what Schmidt says with a pinch of salt!!!! This is the dude who ran a company who is the biggest information and propaganda machine in the world!

[@kinwui]

Steve Job is a perfect example of an imitator.