Здравствуйте! Полностью с Вами согласен, что Айкидо (не важно какой стиль) должно работать на каждом человеке а не только Айкидоке. У меня 2 дан Айкидо Айкикай и есть поговорка для этого случа))) - не бывает плохих уке, а бывают плохие наге....))) Большое Вам спасибо за Ваш канал, продолжайте это не лёгкое дело. Всех благ!!!
J ai pratiqué l aikido 7 ans et je m entraînait rarement avec les hakamas qui une fois qu ils l.obtenaient ne s entraînaient plus qu entre eux ..moi je voulais que mes techniques fonctionnent sur quelqu un qui n est pas conditionné et qui ne tombe pas avant que j ai.appliqué la technique..je précise que j étais instructeur en technique d intervention et self défense danq les forces de l ordre j ai appris l aikido sur le tard 36 ans après un passif dans les arts martiaux karaté ta kwon do boxe savate judo...cela a rendu ma self défense plus efficace..
@jussitaipale367120 күн бұрын
Mr. Mori says here many strong points. You cannot study aiki by no-touch training. I see a bit further, that valuable things develop in pressure. And without pressure training is not truthful either.
I am quite agree with 森先生points of view. But what is the best way to test our Aikido ability among different kinds of martial arts practitioners ? As per my understanding, unless we have competition with different kinds of people, we can't find out the truth of our skills are effective or not. If so, it will violate the basic concept of Aikido. I always think Aikido is contradiction. How do you think about it ?
@FreeSalesTips Жыл бұрын
If we look at history, we know that Japanese martial artists challenged Ueshiba and his Aikido students to contests of martial arts prowess. Technically speaking, they were engaged in competition to see "who can defeat who". Now does this clear event of competition violate Aikido principles of non-competition? I'd say it does. Now I contemplate the meaning of why Ueshiba cultivated a culture of non-competition within his school. I think his very religion had a strong influence on why Ueshiba even taught his Daito-ryu Aiki art in the early years. I also think that the actual physical nature of how Aikido works is also a fundamental reason of why it's not so good for Aikido students to compete with one another in their daily training of Aikido. It is important to understand the dichotomy of a joint lock throw: uke must either to go with the flow of the throw OR uke will get their joints sprained and destroyed when they directly resist the joint lock. In a competition game where you strive to throw your opponent with joint locks, it is very understandable to see opponents inadvertently resisting joint lock throws. When we see a competition where both the practitioners are "fighting" Aikido style vs. Aikido style i.e., a fight competition in matched styles, the outcome is quite likely that joints will get injured. The practical way to avoid such a mishap is to refrain from practicing in the style of a competition fight. This is my thinking of why it's not so good for Aikido vs Aikido to fight one another in a competition. So I go back to the history where some martial artists came to challenge Aikido. In these situations, it is no longer Aikido vs Aikido but asymmetric techniques for handling a fight scenario - Aikido vs. something that isn't Aikido. This kind of scenario involves serious practitioners who have developed senses in moving their body; hopefully this kind of sense includes complying with a joint lock throw instead of resisting a joint lock. I personally approve the basic concept of competition that's taught in Shodokan Aikido where there is one attacker who is holding a physical training knife and there is an empty handed tori using Aikido style techniques to throw/defeat uke. I think that it's dangerous for lower skilled Aikidoka to be practicing their skills in a competition due to their lower level of consciousness to deal with the opponent. I think that testing the Aikidoka's skill in competition should be done for high skill practitioners who should have a consciousness to appreciate the meaning of why their technique fails for their given situation.
90% of Karate is atemi. Both O'sensei and Shioda sensei said that Aikido is 70% atemi! Atemi is needed for self-defence.
@BoyG10 Жыл бұрын
Aikido indeed strayed off the initial path after O'sensei's death. The Aikikai instructors attempted to deify him with miraculous wonders that made people doubted the whole logic of this fanciful dance-like art. Thankfully, Yoshinkan did justice to its Budo's aspects.
@alaincondello6652 Жыл бұрын
Il faut se concentrer sur le fond ..la forme quand à elle.. est adaptable..