Isn't Boltzmann distribution applicable for discreet Energies? I mean gravitational energies are continuous then how?
@PhysicalChemistry2 жыл бұрын
Yes, the energy levels are discrete. But, for macroscopic objects in the Earth's gravity, they are spaced incredibly closely together. So, no matter what energy you name, there is a quantized energy level at or very nearby. No matter what height you name, you can position an object at that height without noticing any quantization. So we just make the approximation of replacing the quantized Eᵢ energy levels with a continuous gravitational energy mgh.
@pepi4533 жыл бұрын
Great explanation, sir!
@PhysicalChemistry3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@berenrogers1676 Жыл бұрын
are you writing backwards or is it camera work
@PhysicalChemistry Жыл бұрын
Camera work. Or computer work, actually. Here's more info: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j57Ze4mhrq-VgsUsi=p545y7PXZRe1Vq5_
@PunmasterSTP5 күн бұрын
Partial pressure? More like "Perfect videos!" 👍
@PhysicalChemistry5 күн бұрын
@@PunmasterSTP Flattery is aporeciated, but can't cover up a weak pun. Partial credit, Mr Punmaster
@PunmasterSTP5 күн бұрын
@@PhysicalChemistry I gotta keep some non-puns or "pseudo-puns" in there to keep people on their toes. And ultimately, it's kind of a meta-game to see people's reactions and help boost up engagement a bit 😆
@The1200r Жыл бұрын
Yep, Yep, that's what I was going to say. The only part I don't understand is how you write backwards so well.
@jeffreywang7665 Жыл бұрын
I could become obsessed and afraid of things at the same moment! Like I’m interested in elevation and how it affects climate, but I’m afraid of inflation and popping noise like some lady trying to do an experiment with the snack bags!