All Men Are Created Equal | Highlights Ep.19

[@TradingTitansCo]

You sir are one of the most captivating people I have ever heard speak. What a pleasure it is to listen to you teach. Thank you!

[@geoffmckenzie2608]

I'm really enjoying the highlight series! Thanks for producing it. These snippets make it imminently shareable with friends who don't focus for long stretches at a time.

[@muzzlethumper]

Born cold, naked and vulnerable. “Created” equal!

[@ZeroMass]

There are many differences out there, speaking of it is forbidden.

[@williamhutcheson6511]

Yeah, sameness and blandness. That's where it's at. Worse yet, nonjudgemental sameness and blandness. Equivalence in all things. A dangerous path. Leading to all sorts of paralysis.

[@christophersnedeker]

People can be unequal on some issues but equal on others.

[@richardkramer1094]

We are all created equal and endowed by our creator with the same inherent natural unalienable rights and the equal opportunity to exercise those rights.

[@dirkdiggler8325]

Beautiful!!!

[@FarbotBurunetNia]

I thank you professor for the lecture.

[@tomschmidt2595]

Concise and succinct. Thank you Dr.

[@terriealexander2344]

happy fathers day great dads and papas

[@blackquiver]

Liberty knows No bounds

[@sacredkinetics.lns.8352]

Great appreciation for your commitment. ✨👽✨

[@Not-the-only-one]

I really enjoyed Larry in the online constitution 101 class.

[@BobEstler]

Alll men are seated equal because we all created in the image of God.

[@Constantine1776]

Yes.. BEAUTIFUL!!!

[@huckleberryfinney4393]

Beautiful! I want my son to be studying at this institution with professor Arnn in ten years when he grows up.

[@richbattaglia5350]

Created equal does not mean acting equal. This is the difference between acknowledging ones being as significant and one’s actions as the thing that defines him.

[@jaybonner9962]

Back in the year 1776 all men were not equal. An autocratic monarch, a king existed. The king was not equal to the people. The king was divine. The divine right of kings. The people were subjects to the king. The king gave the Colonies the right to exist. That rights to the people were given or taken away by the king. The Declaration of Independence says no. That all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. That God given Rights are equally given to all mankind and these rights are not changeable, unchangeable Rights. That among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Later on, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution for the United States of America expanding the list of God given Rights. These Rights are given equally to all mankind by God. Therefore, the phrase, all men are created equal. The divine right of kings asserted that a monarch is not accountable to their subjects because their right to rule is derived from God. The perceived belief was that any attempt to oppose the king ran contrary to the will of God. This is exactly what The Declaration of Independence did, it opposed the right of the king of England to rule over the Colonies. This was serious. So much so that an appeal to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions was made in the last paragraph of The Declaration of Independence. The divine right of kings ended July 4, 1776 and “We the People” became a self-governing nation with the Blessing of God. History repeats itself. The Old Testament of the Bible gives many examples of when the people followed God they were Blessed and when they chose to separate themselves from God they were cursed. Today we in America have chosen to separate ourselves from God. Lord, please save America. We have no clue what a Blessing we were given July 4, 1776.

[@infalliblekingbrooks1700]

It’s a legal phrase on constitutionality.

[@theBaron0530]

Dr. Arnn is right about dogs and children. Having a dog is like having a child who remains a child. Cats, on the other hand, are like roommates, who eat your food, use your space, and barely tolerate you, while not paying their half of the rent.

[@robb6059]

SB 1.2.4, Purport: All men are not equal. There are men who are conducted by the mode of goodness, others who are under the mode of passion and others who are under the mode of ignorance.

[@christophersnedeker]

People can be unequal in some respects and equal in others.

[@davidmackie8552]

All men are created equal. All women are the same

[@oterosocram25]

This statement, "all MEN are created equal" obviously taken from the Bible, what they really meant was "all man are created in the image of God" we are not different from one another we have equal worth in God's eye. Now, by the time they discovered this and more important, truly understood what the verse really said, I am convinced they were pricked to the heart and that they were struggling with what we all struggle with, standing up to Godly principles as flawed men. Thomas Jefferson had slaves and had children with slaves but im sure once he discovered this text, he probably said oh boy!

[@marshaammons8008]

Yes all good men are created by the Living God 🙏💕 may be we can see what has happened to our freedom and Nation under the God Head Yeshua Christ Walked away from him who is the word. The American people are the only ones that believe in the truth about what is going on with the fact that the President is no more a good person but needs a prayer. God bless you and your family and friends and the children. Please understand that we are to pray for this one video and messenger 🙏 God bless 🙏💕.

[@goliathsteinbeisser3547]

If you raise your children like dogs until they begin to speak... You are one messed up household.

[@KathysTube]

👍👍🇺🇸

[@hughjohnson4071]

Are those men born mute, unequal?

[@rickm5853]

They can still speak with their hands

[@richbattaglia5350]

Could the Founding Father’s action to build this Country be seen as a reaction to the tyranny of English Monarchy? If so does the Hegelian Dialectic of thesis (English Tyranny) and antithesis (Revolution) to yield synthesis (The United States) bear any merit? I ask this because I watched through some of the Constitution 101 videos. There was a minor critique of German education with Hegel being mentioned as negatively effecting the United States through the progressive movement.

[@benrcrenshaw85]

Hegel didn't write until the early nineteenth century and his thought did not make it to America until the 1860-80s, so he was not an influence upon the founders (late 1700s). The American founders did not think in terms of dialectical theory or notions of historicism--thankfully! They were overwhelmingly influenced by British constitutionalism and common law, as well as natural law and natural rights. However, they were undoubtedly responding to the English monarchy and its abuses. Just read the list of grievances in the Declaration of Independence. I would not interpret this as part of the Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis formula, which is itself a simplification of Hegel's dialectic.

[@richbattaglia5350]

@@benrcrenshaw85 why would you not interpret the reaction to the English monarchy as part of the Hegelian dialectics?

[@benrcrenshaw85]

@@richbattaglia5350 This is why: 1. I don't believe the Hegelian dialectic is true. 2. The American founders did not view it this way. 3. Monarchy is not intrinsically evil, but was often considered an important element in mixed regimes. The founders were reacting less to monarchy qua monarchy than to its abuses, even though their political philosophy did eventually proscribe monarchy as legitimate.

[@richbattaglia5350]

@@benrcrenshaw85 does something g have to be intrinsically evil to make Hegelian dialectics true? What does Hegelian dialectics mean to you so I can understand where you’re coming from?

[@benrcrenshaw85]

@@richbattaglia5350 ​ No, Hegel's dialectic doesn't rely upon intrinsic evils. Hegel took Aristotle's formal logic and transformed its terms into concepts. He believe that fundamental reality was composed of concepts like Being, Nothingness, Truth, Idea, etc. He constructed his dialectic as a concept and its negation that come into conflict, and through that conflict transcend their differences and produce a third concept that unites their contradictions. The process was then repeated, all while moving toward the ultimate unity of all objective and subjective reality. So, in order for Monarchy-Revolution-U.S. Constitution to qualify as a Hegelian dialectic, Revolution would have to be the negation of Monarchy. But it is not (necessarily), unless Monarchy is intrinsically evil and Revolution is intrinsically good (which neither are). The American Revolution could be construed as the negation of the reign of King George III, but then this would mean it was a reaction to the abuses of monarchy and less monarchy per se (even though, as I intimated, the theory of consent eliminates monarchy as a valid political option). There are such things as constitutional monarchies, even though our Declaration and Constitution make no room for such an arrangement.

[@devontclancy]

If you agree with this you are agreeing with the logic that you are better than someone else, or someone else is better than you. This is not true at all. We are all equal. Imperfect and flawed, but equal.

[@alifqadrmuhammad4542]

It is a false premise that all men are created equal. In the context of The Declaration of Independence, what was being posited was that regardless of station one holds in a conflict all men have right to express and champion their complains. Fast forward to 2021 and the reality is laid bare over such assertions. . . Prove me wrong.

[@teresaleake4777]

Beautiful of equal.

[@willdegato1535]

Juneteenth celebration, Oakland CA, Lake Merritt. Many people $h0t. See the ambulances. See the happy people celebrating by sticking their butt up high and twerking. Climbing up onto the emergency vehicles. Yeah. People are injured, dying...And this. Telling. Meow.

[@CuyanaTGen]

*_Regarding his interpretation of the phrase that all men are created EQUAL, IMO, Arn, is going overboard, particularly when he compares children with dogs._* No need to complicate this: The Founders were expressing their self-evident belief that ALL humans are endowed by their Creator, with an EQUAL measure of HUMAN DIGNITY, by which, each and everyone is to be respected EQUALLY because they all possess EQUAL unalienable human rights.

[@milly152x2]

So what about Parrots? 😂

[@robertronning7016]

For black men considered human then what about native Americans were they human when this was written why can't a child be equal to an adult why can't women be equal to men enough already

[@unbroken1010]

Guys no offense but we proven that a mouse in deep REM sleep is dreaming and dreaming of survival and negotiating its life. We also proved that the DNA pattern of a worms just as complicated as a human.. in some ways even more complex

[@user-ys9to2ie7k]

This guy is an intellectual and leads Hillsdale!? All men are created equal under the law. Rich Man or a Poor Man still is accountable to the same laws and therefore should be equal under the law, but this doesn't hold true today; for those of the far-left and much of government are not being held accountable for their unlawful Behavior. Clinton only said one thing during his presidency that was worth listening to - "the Constitution was written for law-abiding citizens." The judicial system isn't broken, it flat-out does not work. When the breakdown in government fails to hold those accountable because they themselves are corrupt, the social system will collapse and United States is on the precipice ¿`_

[@merlinwizard1000]

40th

[@antgrantrant]

Zera Yakob. Look him up and get back to me. Let's be correct about where we get our idea from, ESPECIALLY on a topic like this.

[@davidsiregar1105]

Well if we are learn a Law, Political, and Filosofis of Human Being, so we Must know what Mr. President George Washington said and put in Declaration of Independence of The United States in 1776, That all Man are created Equal, the 3th US President Mr. Thomas Jefferson he wrote at last of his letter That all Man are created Equal, until the 16th US President Mr. Abraham Lincoln he made that Philosophy on The Emancipation Proclamation and he put in 13 Amandement Constitution of The United States as a final resting for Abolished Slavery. Wow that's the Great Philosophy ever had, cause the Philosophy of all Man are created Equal it was gave a birth of Freedom and Democracy, This equality contains Two Basic Principles of national and state life which bind Human Rights, it was The Principle of Equality Before The Law and Equality Before God, it means every Human Being are created Equal, and The Rights for all People must be Protected by the Law, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Religion or Vote are all protected by Law. Whatever Your Skin Colour or Ras, suppost protected by the Law. So That's my opinion about the philosophy of all Man are created Equal, I'm from Indonesia that philosophy is so Inspiring and Educated. Thank a lot for Hillsdale Collage for this content, it was great 👍

[@rogercanevari6920]

People will be regretting and blaming themselves in few weeks if they miss the opportunity to buy and invest in Cryptocurrency.

[@katiejones7495]

You're right but alot of people want to live a good lifestyle but the way they spend,can't see them get that lifestyle they have desired soon. Besides the rich invest more and spend less, talk more of the poor!

[@teejay8994]

Investing for today is priceless because tomorrow isn't promised, trading Bitcoins, gold, silver and Crypto secure a better Tomorrow •.

[@explorerfalth..9324]

@@teejay8994 For sure,investing in crypto is a big chance of making money nowadays

[@johncole1531]

I also tried to trade Crypto but unfortunately for me I end up with losses 😮

[@austinjordan9949]

@Richard Parker That's why you need the help of a professional who understand the market and how it works very well. I'll recommend you to my Expert Kurt Randy for financial education, he has been my broker and my account handler for over three months now and it's been of good experience and Gain

[@willdegato1535]

CREATED. Presupposes a CREATOR. We, humankind, are created equal in the eyes of our Creator, Then We are given life in this fallen world. This world is not Eden. Paradise lost. The signers of the Declaration are affirming that We humans have certain inalienable rights. Slavery-Yeah, Bad, get rid of it, We did, in a bloody war which ripped the nation asunder. Men = Mankind, in the vernacular of the time. WoMEN, FeMALE. If you are still reading, I assert We are to live our lives with free will and some will return to our Creator through Jesus Christ and get to the new Eden, sans serpent, and live in His presence and with other worthy souls. That is what our Creator wants, to live with Us, his beloved children. This is all explained clearly in the Holy Bible, for those with eyes which see and ears which hear. Try this, There are 1188 chapters in the Bible. Go in 594 chapters, to the exact center. It is Psalms 118:8. Read it. And there are many many more hidden treasures in the Bible. Search Chuck Missler Hidden Treasures. I pray for You to see the incredible wisdom and beauty of His Holy Word. Meow.

[@Cereal_Killer007]

All men arent created equally. Every race has its own unique attributes that are built into each of us at birth weather its physical abilities, intelligence, or something else. Just like different breeds of dogs carry differences that are obvious to humans and yet we turn a blind eye to our own.

[@ericstokes1064]

Thought provoking indeed, but even Thomas Jefferson “saddled” (aka chained) human beings without them “volunteering” as he owned slaves.

[@BlizZzinski]

"All men are created equal" is an old inadequate idealistic maxim. People born with missing or dis-functional elements of their body weren't created equal to everyone who don't have those limitations, especially if those pathologies effect neurological structures; mental incompetents are not currently granted the same rights as the average citizen. It's one thing to declare "all men should receive equal and just treatment under the law" but humans are innately different in their temperaments, cognitive abilities, intelligence and reasoning capacity that is independent of life experiences. The truth is that certain segments of the population do not deserve political power, because they will over-abuse and hyper-manipulate the governmental system into decadence and ruin. Only responsible, diligent, productive people who are focused on the long term success of the nation should have the right to vote, which was the intent in the US Constitution. The declaration of independence was an idealists document from which that phrase (All men are created equal) has permeated, but the US Constitution is the realists implementation, which we have let degrade because of the Moderate Right's obstinate inability to understand that democracy is a terrible form of government and people need to earn the privilege to vote, not have the right bestowed upon them once they reach the age of majority.

[@MilanElan]

Amen!!!! Thank God you exist so I'm not alone in my thoughts!

[@manofpoise5914]

Parrots also speak, duh? And many animal species and especially some singing birds have a vasly larger vocabulary than humans, unsubscribed.

[@manofpoise5914]

Dingos even have vocabulary for "a man with a rifle". gtfooh

[@nursevictoria3294]

According to a study by Tufts University cat brains are the most like humans. It might be why he likes dogs better.

[@JAEJourneyAroundEurope]

Oh and everyone should believe Tufts university bslol

[@nursevictoria3294]

@@JAEJourneyAroundEurope “trust” is a relative term wouldn’t you say? I could say “should everyone “trust” a Hillsdale’s professor?” I like cats over dogs. I certainly think they are more human in my “experiment of one;” fickle, demanding and aloof at times. And also lacking “words.” I think Jordan Peterson said stop and pet a cat, not a dog. The person talking seems biased. In fact, he goes so far as to give that opinion. I don’t know much about Tufts with the exception of their position and that they are a vet school. Certainly more poised to give an opinion on cat’s brains. Trust is something that can be taken by anyone that takes you away from your position for self serving reasons. We are all self serving. If men were angels…

[@nursevictoria3294]

For “the record” I ❤️ these talks. We must bring God back to the constitution. We miss God, we are lost without our compass 🧭 . He does not saddle and ride us. “Government is, after all, the greatest of all reflections on human nature. If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels, governed men, no controls on government would be necessary. But men govern men. So security measures are necessary to control the abuses of government.” I’m just a control measure. Take my opinion or leave me where you find me.

[@Thousand_yard_King]

According to what criteria? You see this is why scientific studies are biased, because the criteria upon which they study it is biased, they don't let it be just pure science that determines the outcome, they ask a question that is biased because they want the answer to reflect the question episode of answering the question based on information.

[@nursevictoria3294]

@@Thousand_yard_King fair enough. That’s odd my reply to you appears to be missing or I can’t see it. Hmmm. Math has a hole at the bottom and so does the law. If we can’t rely on math, where does that leave science. It takes 762 pages to say 1+1=2 in Principia Mathematica.

[@bloodymary3008]

future blm supporters 😆

[@Thousand_yard_King]

How do you figure? Those kids are not going to be BLM supporters, they knew too much now to support something like that

[@bloodymary3008]

@@Thousand_yard_King its a joke 😆

[@myjohnsonnuranus8053]

meet, meet me in the ladies room

[@unbroken1010]

Correction all rich men are created equal.

[@D3Unfiltered]

The fact you bring in “wealth”, and compare it to “All me are created equal” shows the lack of intelligence you have. All men are created equal. America offers the opportunity to all to become wealthy. If you define wealth by billions you don’t understand wealth.

[@philup6274]

Is he legit compared dogs and children? A dog is not equal to man. WTF IS HE Smoking

[@Thousand_yard_King]

He's not comparing them, he's talking about contextually what it's like to raise a child versus raising a dog, keep it in context and then you'll understand.

[@philup6274]

@@Thousand_yard_King Not even rasing a beast (dog) can compare to that of a child. He has his opinion as do I.

[@thehotsinger]

He compares them only in that they require similar care as babes, but human babies, unlike dogs, begin to speak and voice their opinions. Dogs never do.

[@whyidrink40]

I've seen a lot of professors like this. Captivating and charismatic, but yet saying absolutely nothing. Humans are not equal to animals is not the same as all men are created equal. This is a clever way of dodging the most inconvenient statement in the declaration. Hillsdale is a institution dedicated to indoctrination, not learning. If you are not familiar with Con Law, please don't mistake this for serious analysis.