Great story! They were flying faster back then but never with throttles fully forward but faster because of a wing design for higher airspeed
@benc11037 ай бұрын
Early in my flying career we navigated transoceanic with a sextant through the ceiling in a USAF KC-135. And flew low levels with just a chart, compass and clock at 400 kts at less than 200 ft. Now, as a recently retired American Airlines Captain, I realize that navigation has come a long way. But a lot of other things have gone backwards. I'll take the good old days, thank you.
@RustyAimer787 Жыл бұрын
I love your toy Philip! I flew that magnificent plane in the 60s and 70s. One small correction; we didn’t fly all the way with the throttles “firewalled.”That would burn up the engines pretty quick. We cruised at M.82 with the cheap fuel, and later at M.80 with the more expensive fuel.
@tijuanabrassman5 ай бұрын
I thought that didn’t seem right! Who drives their cars at full throttle for extended periods of time?!! Too risky for mechanical failure!
@1marcelfilms3 ай бұрын
@@tijuanabrassman The german cruise control
@claudio767 Жыл бұрын
Wonderfull vídeo, congratulations, my father was a navigator on transatlantic flights, he used sextants on flights in L-1049 ,CV 990 ,DC-8, SUD CARAVELLE and B-707
@pascalcoole27255 ай бұрын
That is quiet an interesting resume !
@ilc-nl3yy Жыл бұрын
My favorite jet
@jackmeyhoffer510727 күн бұрын
Awesome. That was the golden age of aviation. Going on an airplane was actually exciting and fun and people dressed up. Quite a difference from the greyhound buses we fly in today.
@GereDJ22 ай бұрын
Amazing modern era relic.
@David-lb4te Жыл бұрын
5:35 nonsense. The PWJT3 had max continuous limitations as well as Mach number limits.
@TrueSight_3336 ай бұрын
Awesome job on the restoration! I need one of these in my spare bedroom. FYI (for anyone who cares), you don't fly any aircraft at full throttle all of the time, especially jets and especially turbojets - which is what the 707 has. Everything was set according to EPR (pronounced "eeper"). So you had an EPR (engine pressure ratio) setting for takeoff, one for cruise, and one for landing. There are structural limitations (maximum mach) for every aircraft out there, and flying at max power would not only blow up your motors but likely exceed maximum airframe speed (MMO). Just some fun facts for the peanut gallery.
@obriets7 ай бұрын
I still remember being ushered forward to a BOAC 707 cockpit to receive my plastic wings and have my log book signed by the captain. You can’t do better PR than that.
@wapitude7 ай бұрын
Well done on the preservation and restoration. Nothing like having the real McKoy to visit, admire and get educated about. A tad like Classic Cars. Indeed, well done all round - 😉👍👏👏👏👏🙏🇮🇪🙏
@lelabodemichel5162 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video, I love the technology used back in the days.
@tgsredfield Жыл бұрын
Amazing video. Love the 707!
@johncantwell8216 Жыл бұрын
You don't fly with full throttle (5:30): most engines have a time limit of about five minutes for applying takeoff power. Overheating and engine damage can occur if power is not reduced to climb thrust.
@tomking18906 ай бұрын
Engine power is set on EPR, and not to be exceeded. The speed was also faster as this was a narrow body aircraft.
@johncantwell82166 ай бұрын
@@tomking1890 Correct, you can't exceed the maximum allowable speed for the aircraft, and you must observe engine limitations. It is almost comical listening to that guy with the beard say they went all the way across the ocean "with their foot on the floor", then watching the other guy manhandling the throttles and pulling the reversing levers all the way up!
@pascalcoole27255 ай бұрын
@@tomking1890 Early aircraft did not have EPR, you set RPM and checked runway lengt markings to see if T/O was going accourding plan. Scary isn't it ?
@cruxstationalis Жыл бұрын
Wow!!! Following the STARS to navigate!! So cool!
@leilanurena Жыл бұрын
they would site on three stars every hour or so. the navigator had to compute the fix quickly, he was moving at 575 miles an hour
@adenpoller51219 ай бұрын
Very insightful and interesting. Thank you!
@tijuanabrassman5 ай бұрын
Awesome!!! Phil is this in your back yard? Can you show another video of the outside ?? What a wonderful tribute to the greatest jetliner on earth!
@cruxstationalis Жыл бұрын
Such a fun story! Love it!
@j0llyroger889 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic 👍
@peterkoln2837 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant!
@Friends_Weather_Service8 ай бұрын
It was a beautiful still miss it
@sherman_of_the_lake7 ай бұрын
my flight sim should look like this
@laudennn Жыл бұрын
it's incredible to think THAT THE PILOTS would have been sitting here WITH THEIR HEADPHONES ON TALKING BAAACCKCKCK to the tower
@obp6891 Жыл бұрын
Love the steam gauges !!!
@alkorzeniowski6 ай бұрын
My first position at Pan Am ,flight engineer
@AbdullahAli-os9tb4 ай бұрын
Are you was a pilot?
@alexpaar27089 ай бұрын
I want to buy a cockpit and put it in my garage.
@leilanurena Жыл бұрын
only one aircraft ever flew at 100% engine power and her name was Concorde
@sundar9999 ай бұрын
I thought Concorde using autothrottle flew at a set mach speed. or how?
@leilanurena9 ай бұрын
@sundar999 Concorde used reheats to help punch the airplane through the sound barrier or Mach 1. as the speed increased to a value of 1.7 Mach, those reheats, were shut down and Concorde would continue gaining velocity until Mach 2 was achieved at around 50,100 feet. As the fuel was burned off, she would drift up and down on her track across the Atlantic which is why she was assigned a block altitude between 55,000 and 60,000 feet. since she cruised above the normal subsonic traffic, this was perfectly safe. there was nothing in her way
@leilanurena9 ай бұрын
@sundar999 the crew would select the auto throttle into standby mode. should Mach 2 be exceeded or the skin temperature exceed 127 degrees Celsius, the autopilot would call up the auto throttle, asking to reduce the speed and once that was done, the autopilot would place the auto throttle back into standby in they were needed again
@johncantwell82166 ай бұрын
@@leilanurena They also had to deal with Mach tuck in the transonic region, so fuel was pumped into the tail to move the CG aft and get the nose up without using pitch trim compensation. Since fuel capacity was somewhat marginal, as evidenced by the fact that they repurposed Stewart AFB as an alternate for Concorde in case a JFK landing was not possible (Boston Logan was considered too far), I always wondered what might have happened if the fuel transfer pumps failed and they could not get the fuel from the tail to the engines.
@nmflyerrobbin54134 ай бұрын
designed by slide rule and paper draftsman/engineers
@mariovuksanovic5077 Жыл бұрын
The Israeli air force still flies the 707
@billjenkins6879 ай бұрын
Original price was much lower.
@christianbenn316 Жыл бұрын
Sadly the 707s legacy has ended & it was a beauty in aviation back then.