Her lawyers want him to break attorney client privilege. That's obviously the game. Good on his lawyer for instructing him.
@Jbos2011792 жыл бұрын
“Do you think this trial will be Amber’s downfall?” “I accept her destruction.”
@jonahjameson82242 жыл бұрын
Lolloloolol
@theaverageknight2 жыл бұрын
Was this actually said? Is there a timestamp or something?
@tjwash22 жыл бұрын
I would fall asleep if I was on the jury.
@didial11412 жыл бұрын
His lawyers deserves every penny
@TOG2922 жыл бұрын
I see why he's partner at his firm❤
@sedmidivka2 жыл бұрын
the way Turd and her team described Adam I imagined him to be arrogant cocky and unlikeable lawyer. I'm happy they showed me Adam, he actually seems nice and likeable and as any other human around Johnny cares for him very much :)
@reeevans96672 жыл бұрын
😅🤣😂👏👍
@dianeaustin24142 жыл бұрын
Same!!! Thought he would have horns and scales!
@JanNan2 жыл бұрын
I thought the same, again it just shows you cannot trust her or her team 🤔
@Turalcar Жыл бұрын
He can be. He's quite no-nonsense
@harlee8862 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why she didn't change her style of questioning and speak in generalizations.
@beukenboomer6042 жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter because anything JD discussed with any of his lawyers is attorney client privilege. She would have ask questions outside of that scope. Having JD's lawyer on the stand is a HUGE waste of time.
@MontysKillerRabbit2 жыл бұрын
@@beukenboomer604 They wanted to muddy the waters in the eyes of the jury. They wanted to make it look like JD's team was being evasive.
@CaptanF0rever2 жыл бұрын
What, if anything, would you say she should do to avoid further objections? 😅
@ThomasMaiens2 жыл бұрын
@@CaptanF0rever nice 👌🏼
@webstime12 жыл бұрын
@@CaptanF0rever what if anything is not the cure all lol
@dishaniful2 жыл бұрын
How on earth are these recordings even allowed as witnesses. How's any one gonna cross question them and bring out the truth? Who's gonna believe them? It's not a very smart move on their part. Who's gonna listen through all those ramblings as recordings? I know I wouldn't
@AdamantErinyes2 жыл бұрын
I believe these are depositions, which are done with both sides attorneys present. Both sides also have the chance to depose witnesses. Depp's attorneys may have chosen not to cross examine because they didn't feel that there was anything to be gained from it.
@dishaniful2 жыл бұрын
@@AdamantErinyes Got it. Thanks. But then these depositions are still a stupid move on Heard's team. The jury or anyone won't be awake to listen through all that when it's hard to stay alert in the court itself for hours
@yogioto2 жыл бұрын
Why would they cross question him, he is JDs lawyer and they made sure Ambers team got nothing out of him, no need for cross examination. Are you sure you know how the whole process works?
@MamaBearHomeschools2 жыл бұрын
Amber Heard's older female lawyer needs to retire! If she has trouble turning on a microphone when it's her turn to talk or make an objection, I don't know why she's being trusted to question witnesses. Lol! Rephrasing the same questions in 10 different styles, is still the same question. I don't think she understands that concept. 😂😂😂 But how does she not know the laws around attorney/client relationship?!?!
@jackievegas69872 жыл бұрын
She is the greatest advertisement in history of what an incompetent attorney can do for you. ( Guinness world record for not only objections lost on both sides but also trips to the Judge’s desk to help her figure out what her next move is.)
@missmirusrobinson69132 жыл бұрын
"What if anything "🤣
@luckyu5212 жыл бұрын
I’m not sure the jury would appreciate their time being wasted here. Barely any answers given….
@Faalf2 жыл бұрын
She keeps getting rekt, never learns her lesson.
@mhoney78992 жыл бұрын
This video depo is just so funny, somehow you see ben chew and jd kept focus on the screen even though adam waldman was already kept being rejected from answering any questions from the beginning. It's like the main character is actually the two voices of elaine and ben chew whose faces weren't in the video, but what you're actually watching for is everyone else's reaction to it.
@paulmurgatroyd63722 жыл бұрын
If Ambers team cannot formulate questions that can be presented and answered simply and clearly, then you have to ask why they agreed to take on this fiasco in the first place. They must have known from the start this was going to be an uphill battle. Throwing Ambers tantrums and hysteria into it has just put the tin hat on the case.
@dianeaustin24142 жыл бұрын
Amber appears to be breaking her "I never wear makeup unless I am working" rule on this day in court.
@hotcrazycatladyme1682 жыл бұрын
But she is working. This is the role of a lifetime for her... I mean it's her last role anyhow.
@l.w.9802 жыл бұрын
I love the eye roll upwards 🙄...lol
@oriaphyn2 жыл бұрын
Elaine got into a screaming match with Amber behind the scenes. Now she's hijacking the trial running down the time and allowing their witnesses to descredit the defendant. Rottenborn seems to have just given up.
@MediciMedic2 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't that be crazy if it were true? AH being so insufferable that her own team wants to see her burn.
@naveenkataria6612 жыл бұрын
@@MediciMedic Not that crazy tbh if her lawyers are half-decent human-beings 😄
@sarahmurphy80302 жыл бұрын
I feel sorry for Rottenborn. He looks deflated as her lies unravelled. He is realising day by day she is a syco.
@SciDOCMBC2 жыл бұрын
What did this questioning bring now, apart from wasting the time of the people?
@samrudhasrinivasan54252 жыл бұрын
An attempt to plant questions in juries minds
@NicheXCC2 жыл бұрын
Right from the start, the judge seems to be completely tired about all of the waste of time useless witneses. Lol
@brandonlawrence552 жыл бұрын
amber’s team is messed up , this witness did nothing wrong
@JanNan2 жыл бұрын
Adam, is nothing like i pictured him, he seems very likeable, and even though this is long and drawn out, ie waste of time, It has successfully run down their time and that for JDs team excellent 👏 👍 😀
@TH3mrBROWN2 жыл бұрын
I still don't understand why they decided to use this at all lol
@lindamarsh67112 жыл бұрын
Why is he being questioned? He’s a lawyer for Depp!
@mikatteba2252 жыл бұрын
Former lawyer
@allamkhan43482 жыл бұрын
They be gettin desperate
@catherenesathrack43332 жыл бұрын
This is like watching a movie all along knowing who is the villain...i hope captain Jack sparrow wins ...
@yawartzzband2 жыл бұрын
He will
@dianeaustin24142 жыл бұрын
If I was a lawyer I would legally change my last name from Rottenborn. Just saying.
@JoJohXD2 жыл бұрын
Can someone make a mixtape with all the "i accept the instruction"
@outernationalstudios2 жыл бұрын
This was just like AH herself. A big waste of time... same instruction same basis... does ah's attorney just not understand what attorney/client privilege is??? She can't be that dense, can she?
@yogioto2 жыл бұрын
What a waste of the courts precious time, Ambers team claims to respect so much (remember when they always cut off JD with reference he should only answer yes/no and not waste time?)
@stevenspencer-turner78082 жыл бұрын
It's ridiculous the relevance of this,as it happens, complete and boring waste of time from the heard lawyers.
@erin.v.m6572 жыл бұрын
Waldman is a beast.
@supernova7432 жыл бұрын
Why does she keep asking questions she knows are going to get shot down? He can't answer any questions about communications between himself and his client unless forced to by the court and the court would need to do an independent investigation of those communications to determine they weren't covered by attorney client privilege to be brought in as evidence. She can make the inference when it matters, starting so soon is only causing fatigue to the jury, when she wants to make the inference that this guys opinion was a statement from Johnny the jury will have tuned out by then. This whole line of questioning seems to be a waste of the jury's time and i'm not sure they're going to appreciate that. Keep in mind the judge has set limits on the amount of time each side has to present their case so this line of questioning is a waste of ambers time as well. Questioning lawyers is definitely difficult, trying to hold johnny as liable for his attorneys words without being able to determine if johnny was even consulted about making those statement seems to be an impossible task. It looks like ambers counterclaim is just an attempt to counter johnnys claims or reduce damages.
@ginagomez772 жыл бұрын
She completely amber is destroy by her attorney 🤣😂🤣🤣😂
@Simon-dg2rx2 жыл бұрын
This is getting ridiculous.
@gentoolive2 жыл бұрын
Great headline title.
@rustyshackleford20222 жыл бұрын
If the turd slipped you must acquit
@Gigachad-eh5jv2 жыл бұрын
I get it 20 objections is normal but over 170💀?
@Kizaoners12 жыл бұрын
I mean just ... Show a fucking list of questions at the begining and cross out the ones that not allowed...
@islanderbyrd18812 жыл бұрын
Insane lawyer, just like her client Amber Heard.
@jazzybarri30712 жыл бұрын
Is it recorded??
@hupo79792 жыл бұрын
great great grandmon. olady did. vrry bsd questions. to the men
@dianeaustin24142 жыл бұрын
Elaine sounds much better in depositions. She doesn't come off well in a trial situation....rather in a knowing the rules and thinking and speaking " on the fly"...
@tyfaknee Жыл бұрын
From what I’ve heard Elaine is not a trial attorney. Which seems why she was so confused & struggled to ask a proper question that didn’t call for hearsay, wasn’t leading, speculating or relevant. Didn’t look like she was very aware of court conduct. She was definitely out of her league and boy did it show. She might have taken the job to “get her 15 minutes” of fame, but I’m speculating. 😊
@Proverb15.132 жыл бұрын
obsession como con el muffin 😀
@emiliamartinezlopez41672 жыл бұрын
Están consumiendo su tiempo. Porque no tienen nada.
@JanNan2 жыл бұрын
Muy bien
@Gemini16942 жыл бұрын
I see Amber's downfall ❤️
@Proverb15.132 жыл бұрын
Amber’s lawyer are guapos
@hupo79792 жыл бұрын
i think missamber. "s older women lawyer need to be quckly retire.... too crazy. alot questions. for crazy crazy. bad lawyer. old lafy
A Woman can simply accuse a man of a vile act, and the world will support them. A Man have to go to court, ask dozens of witnesses and have multiple pictures of proof, and his road to justice is dismissed as a “PR stunt.” Why can’t A man seek justice without people dismissing it as something it’s not? Killing Arasaka... | Cyberpunk 2077 Rebel Path Guitar MV kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmTCe6WOrNdnoZI Alucard and Trevor Battle Baroque Guitar MV (Lost Cathedral) kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaqlg42Jg898fNU KoF15 Nameless and K9999 Battle Guitar MV kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2qam4anra6aZtk