Amber Heard's Lawyer Lies Blatantly in This Interview | Body Language Analysis

Go to BuyRaycon.com/... for 15% off your order! Brought to you by Raycon.
First Heard & Depp Analysis: • Amber Heard's 2016 Bod...
First Depp Analysis: • Johnny Depp's Body Lan...
First Heard Analysis: • What Amber Heard's Bod...
Second Depp Analysis: • How Johnny Depp's Body...
Amber Heard's lawyer, Elaine Bredehoft, did multiple post-trial interviews. Here is my nonverbal analysis of one of those interviews.
Patreon: / observeentertainment
Observe Merch Shop: teespring.com/...
Audible Trial Link: www.audibletria...
Subscribe: www.youtube.com...
INTRO/OUTRO MUSIC BY AMARIA:
------------------------------
"Funky Souls" | "Elizabeth's Groove" | "Lovely Swindler" by Amarià / amariamusique
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/Funky-Souls
Music promoted by Audio Library • Funky Souls - Amarià (...
Lovely Swindler by Amarià / amariamusique
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/lovely-...
------------------------------
Observe Email: [e-mail]

[@Jaggededge112]

Amber Heard does not represent me nor would I ever want her to. Watching her on the stand and throughout the trial really showcased how she was using the backs of actual victims of DV and SA to pull herself up. She abused Johnny she lied it was very clear. I felt it down to my bones; she acts just like my abusive mother. I am disgusted with Elaine and all the people that obviously didn’t watch the trial that still stands with Amber.

[@Natalie-Smith-1111]

Couldn’t have said it better myself, I agree with you 100% 🤗

[@Jaggededge112]

@@Natalie-Smith-1111 thank you 🤗

[@roselikethewine]

Of course they watched the trial but they cherry pick, and rewrite the narrative just like Amber, to fit into their narcissistic delusions. They’re her flying monkeys and every narc needs them to fight their battles cuz narcs have nothing without their blind cult followers.

[@whitneymouse]

Same! Grew up with an emotionally abusive father and she DOES NOT speak for me!

[@Shug04]

Right on! My sentiments, 100%.👏🏼👏🏼

[@ashg2895]

People saying Johnny Depp winning this case is a "huge set back for women" instead of blaming Amber Heard for lying, absolutely boggles my mind. Both Women & MEN, who are victims of abuse, need to be heard, supported, & deserve justice.

[@JeremiahsLot]

Agree 💯

[@PandoraLockhart]

False accusations always push back progress because now people have an example of one terrible person to invalidate so many real people. If anything , Johnny Depp coming forward will help you stigmatize men talking about abuse and normalizing men talking about feelings and being vulnerable.

[@wildflowers100]

The “Huge Setback for Women” enthusiasts (many of whom admit they didn’t watch the trial) are saying this is “Johnny vs Women.” This is so problematic. It heavily implies that women are the victims and men are the abusers. 🤦🏻‍♀️ wut. And some of the women claim to be gender equity researchers. NO

[@CruellaDeVil.]

People need to chill out on the 'men vs women' and focus on VICTIMS as a whole

[@Kathie4]

YES 👏 It boggles my mind too.

[@AstoricaArt]

Elaine saying this is a setback for women is just insulting. Amber lying about abuse is a setback for all VICTIMS of SA. EVERYONE that has been a victim is hurt by false accusations. Not only women. The reason she lost is because it was proven she was the abuser. It's not saying people who are abused can't speak about it. It's saying you can't lie about being abused.

[@carinalindberg7377]

I disagree, Amber lying in court, showing the world exactly how many abusers and narcissists manipulate everyone else's reality is a win for all victims because it's now out in the open for everyone to clearly see. How cool is that?! However, when people keep saying it will be harder for victims the victims will believe that and think even harder before coming forward. Not because of Amber, but because of everyone telling them it will be even harder when it's not true. On the other hand, Johnny being a man, a celebrity, a wealthy man and a victim should make it easier for all victims, but people minimizing it will send a message to other victims that they are small too. It's really not what Amber or Johnny did at this point, it's about what everyone else is saying. Stop saying it's a setback when it can just as easily be a win and a step forward.

[@stephaniehuie9005]

Preach. 🙌🏼

[@AstoricaArt]

@@carinalindberg7377 That's true. I guess I should have worded it better, that Amber riding on a movement that is supposed to help victims come out, but lied about her own story could make it harder for a lot of people to be taken seriously, because now people can (and unfortunately some will) look at her case and say "well if Amber lied about it then couldn't X be lying about it too?" But I see your point too

[@carinalindberg7377]

@@AstoricaArt Except Amber was caught lying and bad actor or not, she's still a high paid actor, and if she couldn't even lie and be believed, well...

[@Natalie-Smith-1111]

@@carinalindberg7377 agree

[@fallenxxxdestiny5577]

I'm a man and DV survivor, Amber reminds me exactly of my ex wife, I had proof I was the abused and I still got my name tarnished, that's why I'm so happy a man is finally believed and wins such a case! She does not represent women who have suffered such horrible acts, the only thing this is a set back for are people that lie about these things. #abusehasnogender

[@spooky-spaghetti]

thank u so much for speaking out, i'm glad u found some relief in the result of this case.

[@angehdabneh9686]

Amber reminds me of my bff's ex wife so I feel you. The idea that women can't be abusers is hilarious to me, as if it isn't regularly accepted that a mother can be abusive but the moment sex might be involved, nope! Women can do no wrong :|

[@bellaknightR597]

It sucks you had to go through that, I hope you're doing well now

[@thereisnoninadria]

I’m sorry you went through that. My mother is eerily similar to AH in behavior and perspectives. She sent my dad to the ER with a serious shoulder injury and deep purple fingernail marks on him. She proclaimed pride in her behavior until she felt that the jury wasn’t sympathetic, then she pivoted to claims of attempted rape. And she was acquitted! (🤬) When I confronted her about lying she shrugged it off and told me I was overreacting. She picked fights just as we heard AH pick fights. When my dad would try to leave the situation, she would escalate things to prevent him leaving. They were together for 27 years. She made false claims against him to the police, his employer, and anyone else who would listen to her. And then there was her vengeance against him for daring to divorce her. (🫣) I’m glad JD was able to make his case to the court and the world. She exposed herself as the vile snake she is.

[@Kathie4]

Thank you for sharing your story. I'm sorry that you had to go through what you did. My partner was abused by his ex wife & I think that he only now feels more comfortable discussing it. I appreciate your courage bc I know how difficult it can be to talk about.

[@jonijoni1145]

Elaine is so condradictory in everything she says: "The jury essentially is saying that abused women will need to pull out their phones and take pictures as evidence." Well, it was Amber and Johnny taking out their phones and it was their recorded conversations AND photographs that SUNK Amber. NOT, an absence of photos, but clearly doctored and deliberately mis-dated photos. Also, her photos did not match up with the intensity of the abuse she claimed. Add to that, the voice-recordings were absolute FACT that Johnny was indeed a victim. So, no, Elaine, the jury was essentially saying, "The fact that we HAVE recorded evidence shows us that this woman was lying." Elaine is twisting the truth, as she did throughout the entire trial, to further a flawed agenda.

[@carolinecoy3164]

Not to mention she claimed such horrific abuse in Australia that would have hospitalised her,and she took photos of mirrors and lamp shades and how beautiful the house was that they stayed in. Not even if the broken phone. But she took photos where she has the tiniest of "bruising" around her eyes when she's been punched in the face to many times she passed out. And claiming her scalp has been ripped off, which would have happened if he'd dragged her up the stairs. And no blood or redness in that photo. Just looked like a clean bald patch. And not even that bald. Not sure that was even amber's scalp. And the hair on the floor looked like extensions. It was all utter BS. I believe Johnny has to gran her a bs restrain her. But no where near abuse at all. She was the abuser. That audio of her in the car,not allowing him to go see his daughter. She was going on like, stop throwing me against the wall ect, and she said she was going to die😮 I think she thought that would be evidence for her. But we heard the context. She's a 🥜. Plain and simple

[@IratePuffin]

If Amber had won, Elaine would be saying social media had no influence at all.

[@lizabethfeig1705]

TOTALLY!!!!!

[@lynnreinholt1088]

Nobody would hear her though cuz she'd probably have her microphone turned off!! 😂😂😂

[@Neighbor-assistantYN]

Yet they used entertainment level magazine. What was their goal other than saying that they had nothing else to add as evidence?

[@treyk7460]

Amber does not speak for us (women or DV/SA survivors). We do not want her speaking for us when she uses our _real_ pain and _real_ trauma to make up lies in order to ruin the life of *her* victim. That is so incredibly upsetting to hear repeated over and over again by her side and mainstream media outlets. My attacker may have been a man but I see far more of him in Amber's behavior and far more of myself in Johnny. Amber *does not* speak for us. We reject that notion en masse, not because we're some mindless Johnny Depp fans, but because we're survivors and she's not. She's an abuser, she and her lies are the reason women aren't believed, she's the worst of the abuse that men suffer at the hands of women. This verdict spoke for us more than Amber ever will have the right to and we rejoiced at that. And now Elaine and the media are trying to rewrite the history on that and it's despicable. This was not a step back for women or DV/SA victims, it was a step forward for both victims of DV (regardless of gender) and the truth. It was a step back for those who would lie on the stand in an attempt to ruin someone's life. Also: you wondered why it was televised, that was something that Johnny's team fought for because of how deceptively the media had been covering his case. They knew it was the only way the truth would ever make it out into the public. Judging by how abhorrently and deceptively media outlets like The Washington Post and NY Times are still covering this case I honestly think they were right to do so. I can only imagine how little accurate information we would have were it not coming directly to us from the source.

[@gypsylee333]

Well said!

[@citadelofwinds1564]

Well said. Even now, many media sources continue to slag Depp - proving that they did not even bother to review the evidence from the trial. This situation has truly shown just how much media sources can spin the narrative and misinform the public. The only defence is to one's own research and dig up the truth from more reliable sources.

[@maddicarlson4267]

I agree, in anything I watch, this sentiment seems to be echoed by a many DV and SA victims. I haven't seem any in support of her. I'm aure there are some, but it appears to me they are far and few in between.

[@tiaa668]

Completely agree with I support Johnny for the same reason I see me in him also I believe that is why Johnny has so many DV victims backing him they see through the smoke and mirrors of the media and see their own pain in him being a DV victim it is infuriating that Amber can lie so easily about such a serious problem

[@WendyWoo678]

This is everything I've been thinking and wanting to put into words... well said!

[@carinalindberg7377]

Not only did the op-ed heavily point at it being about Johnny, but Amber admitted on stand that she wrote it about him try hurt him because he is a powerful man. Elaine is ignoring the evidence of the trial extremely heavily including her own client's own testimony.

[@dalehammers4425]

That single line by Amber (not knowing when to shut up) sank her entire case, she literally proved defamation on the stand. She did it, nobody else, her. Just like she proved on the stand previously that the information had been leaded to TMZ that she was filing for divorce.

[@citadelofwinds1564]

Elaine is refusing to hear anything that doesn't fit in with her belief system or agenda. Refusing to admit that it was the weight of evidence that proved AH to be a liar and abuser shows that Elaine is not a competent lawyer, let alone a decent person. It's noteworthy that the other members of AH's team are not out there trying to carry on AH's narrative but have been smart and are keeping a low profile. They will be soon forgotten in the public eye. Elaine is making sure of her 15 minutes of fame. Too bad what she's really achieving is infamy.

[@MerelvandenHurk]

@@dalehammers4425 I'm not sure I agree, actually. Let's be clear up front that I'm certain that Johnny was the victim and Amber the abuser and that all her allegations are total crap and that she lied her ass off XD We probably agree on the contents of who is telling the truth and who isn't, my disagreement is solely on the point of what proved defamation. The point wasn't entirely about whether she wrote it about him or not, but whether others could reasonably come to that conclusion, which they did. Long before this suit was even filed people already understood that she was talking about Johnny. I feel like actual victims (which means NOT Amber XD) should be able to talk about their experiences but make sure that nobody can reasonably infer whom they're talking about. What sank her case was that she wrote "two years ago", which directly tied it to Johnny, and the fact that she went out very publicly and leaked that stuff to TMZ and made sure she got her bruise on the picture and didn't try to hide it etc. Everyone knew the op-ed was about him. If her abuse allegations hadn't been public, and she hadn't referred to a specific moment in time, I'm pretty sure it wouldn't have been defamation even if she had been talking about him because it couldn't have been linked to him. But the public already knew of her allegations due to the TMZ stuff and the public TRO filing. So writing an op-ed like that makes people put two and two together and figure out it's Johnny without mentioning him by name, and "two years ago" just makes it worse. So regardless of what she said about it on the stand, the proof that it was defamation was the fact that people knew the op-ed was about him, and thus that it harmed his reputation, plus the fact that she knew the allegations were false. Edit: I just remembered the fact that they tried to deny that she wrote it about him at first. And in that regard you're right that her admission on the stand sank the case, true.

[@dalehammers4425]

@@MerelvandenHurk The difference is assumed inference and open admittance. We all knew it was about him, but it wasnt overtly stated, she admitted in the trial she did it because he was a powerful man and had to be taken down. Her specific words were what mattered. We actually agree on it for the most part.

[@MerelvandenHurk]

@@dalehammers4425 I think we do agree indeed! Lovely ^^ I love it when that happens hahaha

[@shodan6401]

There's a lot of nuance to this case: she claimed publicly that he abused her. He sued her saying that she lied. Then she got on the stand and lied her ass off and lost. Soooo much nuance!

[@BluPandaYT]

Elaine: “Amber had mountains of evidence that was shown in the UK trial, wasn’t used in this trial… lots of medical evidence…” Earlier in the trial… Amber: I never sought medical attention for my injuries … so where did these “lots of medical evidence” come from??? 🤔

[@6thgraderfriends]

With the level of injuries she insisted she got, she would probably be disfigured for life and scarred forever and that would be her evidence.

[@BluPandaYT]

@@6thgraderfriends that she “allegedly” got… but even the photos of her the after Johnny “allegedly” almost beat her to death…. It a single misplaced hair

[@Anonymous-ti8yw]

The case NEEDED to be public because like Johnny said, he didn’t need her money. He wanted to prove that she’s a liar. Defamation cases are INSANELY hard to prove particularly since you have to show malice. This way whether or not the case was unable to prove it was definitely 0% truth (ie maybe some of the jury decided that Depp said something mean and that constitutes abuse), the world still sees what she did. The case was never technically about who abused who, it was about defamation. This way everyone gets the facts and regardless of the verdict we all got to see her stumble over her own lies on the stand.

[@kleigho123]

This is an incredibly important distinction. I've heard so many people say that it was a DV case, &while it included elements of alleged DV/SA, that's false; this was a defamation case. I've also heard many complain about "well why isn't she getting arrested for lying about such a henious crime" which can also be answered by the fact that this was a civil case on defamation, not a criminal case. It's unfortunate, but that's how it goes.

[@citadelofwinds1564]

@@kleigho123 , Well said. I would love to see that POS charged with perjury, but this isn't going to happen. I'm just glad that it was televised so people got to see and hear what a narcissistic abuser looks and sounds and behaves like, both behind closed doors and in the courtroom.

[@emma2370]

Yep. Look at how much the media has lied about this case even when we could see it with our own eyes. It had to be made public so people could make up their own minds about who the victim was.

[@sabudhungana1008]

Defamation case is hard to prove because in most of the case it only relates to some false statements that somebody made about somebody else. You have to prove that they knew it was a false statement when they made it, and their intention was malicious. But in this case, once they knew Amber lied under oath about him beating her up and sexual assault, that added burden of them proving that she knew that it was a false statement was automatically not necessary. And anyone would only lie about something like that if they had malicious intentions.

[@wendyclemente9026]

Elaine keeps talking about “the evidence” amber showed is nothing compared to what other women have shown before and the abuser still gets a slap on the wrist. Her evidence was a joke. She wasn’t doing nor did anything for women. I think she forgets that this is a defamation case. Her lawyer is joke.

[@3_times_mum520]

She is not a victim, she's the abuser. And she lost because off all her Lies. She is definitely not represent anyone but her self. Not women, not victims, not survivors.

[@MsAlonzo26]

And definitely not me lol We here for the facts, the truth 💥 Sending uplifting vibes to all women that have been affected by this. Sending ❤️ Love

[@cosmic_cosmos1]

Only a narcissist would think their loss affects the world.

[@mj6962]

AMEM AMEN AMEN TO THAT!!!

[@narushini704]

She was both, just like JD. Saying she didn't get abused is wrong, even though she did abuse as well. Everyone was able to see the evidence from both sides.

[@dwentlandt1022]

After listening to the hours upon hours of the tapes online I not one time heard JD being abusive to AH. He sent really ugly text messages about AH to his friends and security but not directly to her. He yelled at her many times while he was trying to leave the room or penthouse or hotel, I also listened to the recording on Australia with the finger incident. She admitted to throwing that bottle. Did she intend to hit his hand, I don’t believe so but just admit what you did and apologize and move on. JD was stupid for thinking someone like AH would be any anything from him but to use him for her own personal gains. So many lies came out of her mouth. JD wasn’t innocent but he, in my opinion, based on everything I heard, says he was far less abusive and when he caused injury to her he said owned it in court. The black eye from when he grabbed her to pull her close to make her stop hitting him and his chin hit her cheek. Stupid because he shouldn’t have touched her in any way. The door and her toes. Even though he was trying to protect himself from her he felt bad for the door going over her toes. He owned his crap. She still wants to blame everyone else just like in court where she did say everyone except herself was lying. Her witnesses couldn’t even tell the correct story that she wanted them to tell. Rocky, her sister, Josh Drew acted like he was the closest to honest and he didn’t want to be doing that deposition. AH deserved that loss and all DV and SA victims need to be vocal and let her know she doesn’t speak for anyone else. I say that as the survivor of being raped in college that also ended in a pregnancy. AH can kiss my backside

[@meganott35]

I am a victim of assault and I know how it feels to be used. The thing that really makes me mad though is that Amber’s lawyer is making it seem like only women can be victims. MEN ARE VICTIMS OF ASSAULT TOO!!!

[@Mstrskeletor89]

They cant accept that notion to them saying a man can be abused is akin to blasphemy

[@ironicallyxiconic]

EXACTLY!! #MENtoo

[@dedekat1631]

Me too is a genderless movement. If it isn't, than it should be. Equality requires it.

[@lisadawson6712]

I too am a survivor of DV, watching the vile woman on the stand triggered me beyond belief because she was gaslighting, twisting and turning and clearly faking whilst on the stand, it sickens me that she puts herself in the shoes of those of us who have genuinely been abused, how dare she! I also have only found out tonight watching a video that Kate James AH ex PA told Amber about her own SA and amber took Kates story and twisted it to make it her own, Late testified here in the uk, that’s just sick , no one does that unless they’re absolutely twisted. I’m sorry you’ve been through these experiences, no one should have to x

[@reneeratliff1937]

My son was victimized. He is 6 foot 3in. Has taken him 10 years and lots of counseling. No one believed him!!!!!

[@christinamatzen4214]

Why didn’t they ask questions like “She lied about the donation and they proved it, why did she do that”?!?! I have so many questions I want asked. I can’t believe they wasted their time like that.

[@faithfox8851]

I’m sure there are questions that are off limits, and points they are not allowed to bring up. I’m sure that was one of them. They probably wasted their time because it was an “exclusive”. “Ambers lawyer speaks out for first time since verdict”. Good way to get viewers in, even if they can’t ask the real questions we all care about

[@bellaknightR597]

I'm pretty sure tv nterviews like this have a time limit and they can only ask so many questions with in said time limit

[@Conformist138]

"The jury is told not to do these things, but I just have to assume they broke the rules and defied direct court orders straight from a judge." Good, good. This is great. Awesome. I love it here.

[@love2smyle]

I get so frustrated when they say JD was never named in op ed but on the stand AH herself said it was about him. She clarified who it was about all on her own.

[@citadelofwinds1564]

Camille basically pushed her into admitting that. Amber got so angry that she unwittingly admitted the truth. It was much like this moment from "A Few Good Men": Kaffee: “Did you order the Code Red?!” Jessup: “YOU'RE GOD DAMN RIGHT I DID!!!” Camille: Gotcha, you lying bitch.

[@sigheyeroll]

By my recollection she actually did it twice in the entirety of the trial.

[@lynbo9234]

@@sigheyeroll correct. When Camille got under her skin on cross examination towards the end, she finally admitted it. I think she said it and Camille basically asked the same question a different way so a) she could confirm what AH said and b) to reiterate it to the jury that AH did, in fact write it about JD, proving defamation.

[@kaylinsnyder14]

I genuinely think that Johnny and his team fought for cameras to be in the courtroom so that way even if he didn't win, people still understood that he wasn't this terrible person that she told the world that he was. That piece of audio where she tells him to "tell the world that he a man is a victim of domestic violence tell the jury and the judge and see who believes or supports you" I think that sealed her fate right there. She told him to tell the world so he made sure that the world could watch.

[@JaimeLee0555]

Yup. Johnny just wanted his reputation back and main stream media reports on lies. He wanted us all to decide for ourselves who the true abuser was.

[@markmathisen3908]

That why Amber and her lawyers were TERRIFIED that cameras would be in the courtroom; they knew that once the evidence was shown to the world she was unequivocally DONE. They wanted it private to control the media spin.

[@Alyssa_M513]

I agree. Also since his reputation was so damaged, I think it was important for his name to be cleared in the court of public opinion and for her lies to be exposed to everyone. It's so insulting and disgusting for Elaine to call the jury's integrity into question. Most jurors take their duty very seriously and I don't think it's fair to assume that they looked at social media during the trial related to the case.

[@selenam9233]

100%

[@dalehammers4425]

Well considering Amber could never afford to pay the suit even if/when Johnny won, there was literally no other reason to do this other than clear his own name. And we NEEDED the cameras to see how utterly insane Amber is to really clear his name. I'm not even a Depp fan and feel for him after this as I was in his shoes once with a psychotic woman that was exceptionally abusive to me and actually convinced me I was the bad one. NOBODY, male nor female, should ever have to go through that.

[@Emily-ck9ji]

I'm glad everyone is taking a closer look at Elaine and her behavior since the trial ended. The way she continues to try to victimize both Amber and herself while attacking Johnny is beyond gross. Amber lost because she lied, lied ON THE STAND, gaslit, assaulted, defamed, and tried to destroy her ex-husband's career and life.

[@DiamondsLilRooster]

I would love to see Dr. Curry do a work up Elaine like she did on Amber. I imagine they are pretty similar.

[@jennifermariejoyce]

@@DiamondsLilRoosterThat would be amazing. I’d bring the muffins.

[@hannie.haneul]

AH took JD to the court for words his ex-lawyer said.... now let's see if JD, the judge, the jury, or anyone would sue AH for lies Elaine vomited out of her mouth.

[@Burscutum]

She was obviously rude and unprofessional throughout the trial. I never understood why people felt bad for her. Yes, shes just doing her job; and yes, I imagine trying to defend someone like AH would be extremely difficult and frustrating, but she still acted like a petulant child and deserved much of the criticism she received. Obviously threats and stuff is never acceptable- not even against Amber, let alone her lawyer- but the criticism pitched against Elaine's was generally well earned.

[@dalehammers4425]

Her actions since the case are literally screaming "Sue me for defamation".

[@fovosprodromus5020]

I appreciate that you pointed out the tactic many people use today: "either you're for this or against an entire group of people". It's not a good argument nor is it a sound one. Fantastic job as usual !

[@tracymartinson2927]

I'm with you, that was hard to tolerate. Kudos to the interviewer for calling her out on personal accountability. So many things wrong with the whole thing. The UK case wasn't against AH. It was against a tabloid. The tabloid has a much lower threshold for vetting their story. Unless they knew AH was lying they had every right to print the story they were given. Amber is not believable. We literally listened to her verbally abuse JD, admit to hitting him. Its in the recording. We heard it. So to sit there and say no abuse from AH is not only a lie but one with zero credibility. This lawyer just wants to keep charging AH more more money for the appeal so she keeps up the charade. The reason it was on camera was because JD's true goal was to redeem his character and reputation for the whole world. A closed trial wouldn't do that even if he still won.

[@brandifaith3410]

Throughout this entire trial, I felt bad for Elaine knowing that most people would hate her just because of who she was representing. Because of this, I never had any issues with her. But after seeing those interviews, I was extremely disappointed and at times very mad. Forget whether Johnny or Amber is innocent or guilty, forget their entire case really, the fact that Elaine mentioned all this evidence that supposedly should have been allowed is just insulting to the judge and the rules they have in place which determines whether evidence is admissible or not. She essentially blamed the judge and accused her of bias by saying that there was evidence that should’ve been admissible. There is always a bunch of evidence from both sides that is declared inadmissible in any trial. I found the fact that she basically called out the judge extremely unprofessional and disappointing. That poor judge did an incredible job at dealing with this circus and definitely did all she could to be fair. The other thing that made me mad was when Elaine accused the jury of looking at social media or having their family inform them of what is going on. Jurors take an oath, and they take it extremely seriously. Jurors already have this extremely serious job of deciding peoples fate, they aren’t going to just take that lightly. Elaine basically accused the jury of perjury. In just 2 interviews, she not only blames everyone else, but she accuses the judge and jury of what is essentially crimes. It was hard to hear her talk about this “massive setback” for women of DV and hear her blame everyone else and admit no issues on her team or Amber’s part, but it was infuriating to hear her blame the judge and jury. Extremely unprofessional. She could’ve continued to defend her client without condemning the judge and jury. Very disappointing.

[@johnatandelacuso4174]

During the trial Elaine has shown herself already to be very sketchy to this sort of stuff. One quote I remember is when she aksed the tmz reporter that took the stand for johnny if 'this was going to bring him (the reporter) his 15 minutes of fame' because johmny was a high profile person. She was already really going for low blows diring the trial alongside with mr. Rottenborn and hearing this interview just cemented my opinion of her. Nevermind the fact that johmny has been called a wife beater for years, was dragged through the courts all this time, and was told by amber herself that 'no one would believe him' and has had his career and possibly some personal relationships ruined because of amber. Thats why it annoyed me when she said amber was 'getting death threats' too. She is feeling what johnny has been for years now because she wanted to drag his name out for as long as possible. And if she didkt post that op ed to restab the knife and show herself as a saint none of this would have happened. Its one thing to defend someone like that on the srand but to go out and continue to stick your neck out for them by fabricating the facts of a highly publicised trial is downrgith devious.

[@beaniebb]

Very well said. She blamed everyone else for their 15 mins and here she is on a press tour lmfao seems like Amber couldn’t pay her and she wanted that money

[@horrorgirl688]

Her "quotation marks" when she said The Truth makes me SICK!! I felt a little sorry for her until THESE interview's.."Demonize Amber" please, She is a demon on her own.

[@thevoicebehind91]

​​@@johnatandelacuso4174 on one hand I'm glad AH wrote the op-ed or she would've gotten away with everything... It breaks my heart to know how much JD has suffered and has to broadcast to the entire world the most humiliating things that happened to him... but I guess it needs to happen for him to be free.. I'm glad he stood strong the past 6 yrs and fought for the truth.. and as for Elaine I thought she was just an average lawyer with a hard to defend client...but as the trial went on she just showed her true colors she's as horrible as AH.. I almost fell bad for her.

[@saraleewang]

Yah she started to blaming everyone, looks like she did learn something from her client

[@nocturnalizzie]

If they had a ton of evidence to show that Amber was abused... why didn't we ever see it?? That's like the "Oh, my girlfriend goes to another school, you wouldn't know her. But she's real, I swear!!" thing kids do.

[@maddicarlson4267]

Right? Also, why didn't they turn over the metadata? If that is evidence why not turn it over? Sounds fishy to me.

[@agsmith43]

That statement was Elaine throwing the judge under the bus. The judge decides what is viable evidence. There is plenty of evidence that Depp's team could not use. In this interview she blamed the Judge, Jury, Depp's team, and every person on social media who didn't believe them. So disgusting and unprofessional.

[@agsmith43]

​@@maddicarlson4267 Depp's team had the metadata redacted from trial. This is because the photos metadata, that Heard provided, was not forensically proven correct. Therefore, Depp's team focused on the testimony and how her testimony did not match.

[@maddicarlson4267]

@@agsmith43 from my understanding from lawyers on YT is she did not turn it over in the beginning so it could be forensically proven. If they tried to get it in later without being able to have it forensically analyzed I wouldn't allow it either. Her testimony didn't even match up with what 3rd party witnesses were saying either, ones who didn't have anything to gain or lose.

[@thespankmyfrank]

She took photos of every little bit of the apartments and floor and goddamn crooked picture frames right after the alleged abuse but not once the actual injuries or bloody pillows or the broken phone he allegedly hurt his finger on while smashing to pieces. It's just so unbelievable.

[@katfromthekong414]

Being female and having survived abuse I can only commend Johnny that he had the strength to stand up for the truth when most of us are usually just left picking up the pieces of our life and walking away. This whole "sad day for women" BS is so gaslighty it hurts

[@kimbarleemoon3870]

I can imagine that it took a great amount of courage to expose himself to the world and take that risk, but it also takes great amounts of money to sue anyone for just about anything in a civil case. The fact that it is more than $250,000 suit makes it a federal court case and that sh!+ ain't cheap! I agree though that any forms of abuse or theft I have experienced has been chalked up to move on and get better because no one else is going to do a goddamned thing about it! Especially the law, how could they possibly track and keep up with the insane amount of absolute depravity that humans display on a rather grand scale nowadays? Just nuts!!!

[@katfromthekong414]

@@kimbarleemoon3870 was just nice to see a narcissist get their comeuppance so publicly

[@kimbarleemoon3870]

@@katfromthekong414 Agreed!

[@spooky-spaghetti]

thank u so much for standing up for abused women when amber and her team try to invalidate u 💜

[@katfromthekong414]

@@spooky-spaghetti thank you, that's sweet of you! I "only" experience psychological and emotional abuse (at the hands of a "best friend" not a partner), but it took me years to work through it and I still have major trust issues. Can't even imagine how Johnny must feel, so his strength and resolve are really inspiring.

[@treearoha]

Growing up I was abused by my mother. Mentally, emotionally, physically. I watched as my father also suffered this same abuse for nearly 20 years. Women like this don’t see themselves as abusers. They feel genuinely justified in their behaviour because they are narcissists. And then when the abused finally speaks up or lashes out or tries to defend themselves, they immediately victimise themselves as if they haven’t been doing the exact same thing and much much worse. Narcissistic abusers are so blind to their own behaviour and Amber is the perfect example of this. Abuse and denial abuse and denial abuse and denial. People like this will DESTROY you.

[@NatsumiMichi]

I'm at a point I can't even watch reaction/analysis videos of AH or her team, the amount of lies and wild tales they're spinning is making me sick. This interview is what sealed it for sure. I even had a minute amount of pity for Elaine throughout the trial but here she proved she's just as bad and manipulative as her client. They really do have the same holier-than-thou attitude going, nothing is their fault, everything is JD and social media and the jury and the damn court that discarded their mountain of useless evidence. It's not like they lost because AH is a fraud and proved it well on her own on the stand every time she opened her mouth. Nope. It's JD alright, he somehow paid and organized hundreds of millions of people to side with him and that got the jury on his side too. That and their continuous mindset of claiming their loss affects women (and ONLY women...) in some sort of negative way is just disgusting. She lost because she lied, and the only message it sent is 'don't go lying to court about something that didn't happen'. How is that sending the wrong message? Get outta here, Elaine.

[@Sun-et3my]

I guess Elaine is getting her 15 minutes of fame. I love how she blames Johnny's fame for Amber not being believable. She wasn't believable because of the overacting, non-tears, weird faces, and being caught in several lies. THAT'S WHY.

[@maddicarlson4267]

15 minutes of fame as a villain most likely.

[@TR4zest]

Most importantly, the evidence showed she lied.

[@Kiefsti]

I hope she has a good, stiff, mega-pint for when it crashes.

[@BergenholtzChannel]

I was most offended that she accused the jury of watching social media. How insulting and quite an accusation!

[@ArthurMac15]

It's fair enough for you to find offence in this but, It's not an unrealistic statement to make... they (the jury) may well have seen what was happening on social media; in fact I'd go as far as to say its kinda unavoidable in this current society considering social media is humanity's main source of communication and information, opinions can well and truly be swayed even with the strongest of willpower to remain unbiased

[@maddicarlson4267]

@@ArthurMac15 actually it is highly unrealistic. According to all the lawyer commentators, jurors actually take their job extremely seriously and are more likely to follow the rules than not. There are always outliers and ones who don't, but it gets found out and reported pretty quickly.

[@melocoton7]

Yeah she is walking on very thin ice with that statement. Other reaction channels, lawyers, have said that she is opening herself up for a defamation case herself.

[@TR4zest]

@@ArthurMac15 That is so unfair. They were under oath not to subject themselves to outside input, and they were reminded at the end of every day by the judge. I am sure they have more morals and backbone and sense of duty than you could imagine, and delivered on their responsibilities.

[@TR4zest]

@@maddicarlson4267 I think @Arthur Mac would be an obvious outlier, found out and reported.

[@Scriptkitty-sd8dp]

I'm just so sick of being lied to. I think that's why this case resonated with me so much. I feel constantly gaslit and manipulated by the media and certain people in my life also. So it was amazing seeing the truth come out, and a victim of not just abuse, but insane emotional manipulation get justice. I know people like Amber, and I'm not the most confident person to begin with, so I'm easily manipulated. I know I am, but I can't see it as it's happening. This was amazing because I was able to use examples from this trial to explain things happening in my life in words I wouldn't have had otherwise. Hope that makes sense.

[@gypsylee333]

I relate man

[@yaniwet]

I wish you all the best. Stay strong!

[@katmack4215]

Realizing people have treated you this way..is a big heads up,to recognizing it next time 😏 hope ya set clear boundaries,stay strong,and don't tolerate it in the future 👍

[@NickM_FirstofHisName]

There are books on manipulation, Kitty! They help you trust your guts about someone's actions.

[@MightDie]

With yah wholeheartedly!!

[@Domcas74]

Amber’s fans could also have got up at 1am to queue each day to support her, but obviously no one felt strongly enough to do so

[@justmissy7415]

Truth is genuine. Lies are rehearsed, forced and unnatural. You spoke clearly on what the world saw and felt to determine their decision. Well said! Thank you from many!

[@Style_224]

The true trait of a narcissism blame everyone else for a serious issue that you committed

[@b00ts4ndc4ts]

Awesome I needed that. Thanks 👍😊

[@vertebrae9204]

can we please stop call every liar/ abusive person/ unpleasant person a nArCiSsiSt ? stop the ableist bs.

[@b00ts4ndc4ts]

@@vertebrae9204 read it again sweet pea, it's a joke and not a remark about anyone.

[@vertebrae9204]

Gareth spare me the unwanted nicknames. put it into the trashbag where the other bs belongs.

[@b00ts4ndc4ts]

@@vertebrae9204 I was trying to be nice too you and point out the mistake you made and all you do to thank me in return is to give me jip. I see you delete your comment. next time I will not even waste my time.

[@nm2358]

Elaine really blew through any sympathy I had for her with these interviews after losing. The shameless lies about the jury being influenced by outside sources really, really is gross, especially for an officer of the court.

[@davidjbiscoe957]

She never answered a single question with a simple answer. She side stepped every question

[@FillingMirrorsPhotography]

Just like her client

[@curlychapina]

@@FillingMirrorsPhotography hahaha I was gonna answer the same 😅

[@ZackRekeSkjell]

I find it baffling how she can say they had a lot of medical records of Ambers injuries. However, when asked about it in the trail she constantly said she hadn’t seeked medical help.

[@Bella62]

The “medical” records are not from a medical practitioner but her therapist and they are not admissible because they are considered as hearsay. It’s Ambers words to the therapist and she can say whatever she wants to her therapist weather it’s true or not.

[@ZackRekeSkjell]

@@Bella62 Exactly!

[@Marmarboo]

I’m kinda confused why people are questioning why Johnny wanted cameras in the courtroom. This is why. Amber’s own interview is why. She lies and she doesn’t stop. If we didn’t see what happened in the court, we would be way much more easier to sway and be manipulated by her. JD did a hella good move when he brought cameras in. He showed everyone what he had to deal with, the platant lies, gaslighting, deminoring. He wasn’t perfect either, far from it but he wanted the truth out and he did achieve that

[@Bella62]

Wasn’t it the judge herself that wanted the cameras in the court so they wouldn’t be inundated with press?

[@Marmarboo]

@@Bella62 Was it the judge? I understood that it was Johnny’s team that wanted the trial to be televised 🙊 Who ever wanted them in made the right call tho

[@GenericaQwerty]

I'm a woman who over my lifetime has been abused by three separate narcissistic women. This case was not a loss for me, Elaine! It was validating! Edit: also it drives me wild when people who haven't watched the trial cry "believe all women". Okay cool. Who do you believe, me or my three female abusers?

[@Mstrskeletor89]

Lmao clearly theyd believe all of you cause youre all women

[@EpcotCenter1982]

I wish I could like this comment more than once. It speaks for me as well.

[@alleyj826]

It’s mind numbing that that hashtag of “believe all women” became a thing. Like we really want to act like women aren’t capable of abuse? The gender bias just makes me sick

[@maddicarlson4267]

I think the hashtag should be changed to believe all victims. To me the believe all women seems a little sexist, basically stating men can't be victims.

[@katapillabutterfly68]

Yes! Validating indeed!!!

[@Minris1]

The most annoying statement Elaine makes is “the first thing she said was how sorry she was for all the abuse victims she had let down because she lost”. She. Did. The. Damage. If she’d won it would have been something to apologise for.

[@MyaB1986]

She didn't even say shit. She just stormed off through the door alone without her lawyers, and left home with her sister. And the next thing she said was the official statement she did, again blaming Johnny. So, no she didn't say it.

[@Ichneumonxx]

that is such a narcisstic thing to say too. How dare she speak for every woman out there! As if she was some sort of virtue beacon. "Well, I lost, so now I will drag you all down with me".

[@thespankmyfrank]

It's just to paint her in an angelic light. "She didn't think about herself, she thought about all other abused women!!" ie she's a saint... it's such a blatant lie.

[@im_camilas_fav]

@@MyaB1986 exactly! She was PISSED! Amber CLEARLY doesnt care about anyone other than HERSELF.

[@shannond7437]

No way Turd said that like Elaine’s script claims. 😹

[@ladycat1561]

The one thing that makes me sad for humanity is that some people view it as: "now every woman is a liar." But it should've brought up. "Men have these same problems and there should be awareness for men and women." No one is allowed to make you feel in any way unsafe. Especially in your own home. And that goes for everybody. We should learn from these things, not unlearn things that were forced into the light.

[@wholethedogsout880]

@@narushini704 😐

[@SteamPoweredSmurfette]

@@narushini704 JD took accountability, AH didn't.

[@narushini704]

@@SteamPoweredSmurfette He did not with his messages. He claimed he did not remember and implied that someone took his phone to write them. He was very calculating, settled/controlled and even superior. But most people seem to love to forget that.

[@narushini704]

@Lex R You do you and support him. You obviously haven't been dealing with victims of narcisisstic abusers and pathological liars. The sad thing is that all I claim is that the evidence ponits to them both being toxic but some here just *want* JD so badly to be innocent you would reinterpret and deny any evidence but actual footage (or maybe even that) just to keep your point of views.

[@maddicarlson4267]

@@narushini704 but you are cherry picking at most a minor lie compared to her massive lies she made on the stand. Recounting events that didn't occur.

[@michellecgb]

To help you understand why it was televised: I am pretty sure the judge decided to televise the trial to avoid more of a circus in the courthouse. They wouldn’t have been able to contain people. They had trouble managing the line of attendees as it is, imagine if it wasn’t televised and people had an even greater need to get in there by all means. Edit: Amber’s team opposed the motion (I wonder why they wouldn’t want the world to see her on the stand) and Johnny’s team had no problem with it.

[@jenniferw.1665]

I think it’s very telling that most women that are actual survivors of DV/SA don’t side with Amber. It’s because we can see through her just like when we saw through our abusers. It’s like she watched whatever movies/tv she could on the subject and is going off that. And in typical abuser fashion, she CONTINUES to harass Johnny, because she can’t handle that she no longer has control over him.

[@jennifermariejoyce]

The trial was televised for transparency purposes. The law in Virginia says that if one party in a civil case wants cameras in the courtroom, they will be. Elaine says here that she fought against it, but it’s the law, so no. No, Elaine.

[@ethical13]

Also, why is it damaging for AH to have cameras in the courtroom if justice is on her side? If she is not lying, what's the problem with the whole world watching her testimony??? I would think she too would want the proceedings to be televised if she had nothing to hide.

[@jennifermariejoyce]

@@ethical13 Exactly.

[@Queen_Kellz_1120]

Her "fighting" so hard against the cameras speaks volumes ... big mad everyone watched her get caught literally red-handed lying thru her perfectly polished teeth

[@sophiamassie6200]

In the eyes of everyone who has ever truly gone through SA (myself included) Amber is so clearly not a victim. Not a survivor. She reminds us all of our abusers. It feels wrong to call any woman a liar when it comes to SA. This whole thing is so sad.

[@ForPapaandGrandma]

I don't know of any survivors in my personal life and online who believed AH. In fact, she reminded many of us of our abuser(s)--word-twisting, revision of history, gaslighting. I had to stop watching...

[@sleeplessinscotland2578]

Agreed. I watched the whole trial - johnnys testimony made me sympathetic towards him, i empathised with him very deeply. Watching amber made me angry, uncomfortable, triggered and I had to keep skipping through it. She wasn’t believable, I don’t for a second believe she is a victim. And she doesn’t speak for me as a survivor or for any that I know in my life or have discussed this with online. We’re not stupid, traumatised yes, but not stupid. We see Amber for what she is

[@paradox13]

this was not a loss for us women, this was an awesome win for victims of domestic abuse, male or female. edit: also great video as always Logan!!

[@louiseevans5752]

JOHNNY DEPP IS A H E R O 4 BARING ALL THIS TO THE WORLD

[@relativelypositive]

Thank you for spending the emotional energy you have on this case to break down some of these instances for us. I know it can be a lot, hope you are both doing well and doing some well deserved relaxing things after this, like a nice hike in the woods or something!

[@SydMountaineer]

Not "medical" records, & the "mental health records" are therapist notes, which are what Amber told her therapist, which is hearsay upon hearsay.

[@hdnft4633]

I am pretty sure it was Depp who said he’s not perfect and Elaine making it seem like it was Amber. It is frustrating that they’ve turned this case into a Depp vs all women. Men and women of DV who watched the trial are on his side because he was the victim, not the perfect victim. I don’t care about famous people fighting but to twist the narrative of the verdict is so infuriating when jurors had to sit through that mess for 6 weeks.

[@dalehammers4425]

She is opening herself up for defamation suit against her as well. You cant lie on stand about someone, or on tv afterwards and not get blowback from it. Johnny's team proved IN COURT that Amber's claims were false, to now keep pushing it, is defamation.

[@maddicarlson4267]

@Lex R exactly! She also greatly downplayed her childhood abuse and her drug use.

[@Jodidub]

Seriously, why is she’s trying to gas light millions of people?!?!??!?

[@blueshoes915]

Completely agree. We’re on his side because he is the victim. I’m sure he reacted with some reactive abuse, but he is still the victim.

[@CreatEr1n]

The judge was extremely biased in the UK. His son works for one of The Sun's affiliates. Amber wasn't on trial. She was a witness. The judge took her word for many things without proof, including whether or not she actually donated her divorce settlement to charity. There was an audio recording that was omitted from this trial that was incredibly damaging for Amber. On it, she's heard crying and apologizing for cutting off Johnny's finger. Her nurse had to sedate her. The reason it wasn't allowed into evidence is one of the people who can be heard on the recording (Jerry Judge) is dead and couldn't testify. It makes her lies that much worse.

[@JayaLove]

Wow!! This is the first I’ve heard of that audio!

[@spooky-spaghetti]

yes yes yes! this audio is so important it's such a shame it couldn't be used in the trial. i really recommend searching for it if u have interest in the case, it's extremely telling.

[@karicamacho6672]

I actually think this did something great for men. I know several men that have been abused by women, this made them feel less alone. They’ll never talk about it publicly but they related to him in this trial. I’ve also seen so many sa and dv survivors speak up about how they don’t believe her because of …(their reasoning) and I keep seeing it over and over again. I genuinely do not think it was a set back for women. I do feel like it shined a spotlight on abuse other than physical such as manipulation and intimidation

[@dalehammers4425]

I am one of those men. And while I'm not a fan of Johnny Depp as an actor too much, as a man I can relate.

[@citadelofwinds1564]

The trial certainly showed the world how women can abuse a man - verbally, emotionally and physically. There is such a thing as toxic masculinity. There is also such a thing as toxic femininity. This trial has exposed the latter, and people who are still bleating that women possibly cannot be abusers are basically siding with and enabling abusers. But decent, reasonable people saw the truth: Amber Heard is a serial abuser and a perjurer, and lost the case because her lies and malicious intent were exposed.

[@jessicacharlton7347]

I think in some ways it will set women back because people will use Amber Heard as an excuse to call women liars when they say that they were abused. That said I'm glad people are realizing that men can be abused by women.

[@joannarockland6221]

It was actually a step forward for women. Standing up for men and supporting them will be much easier now that there’s such a public example with such large support. Because when one gender loses so does the other. We’re in it together and equally. I am SO happy for my fellow man!

[@matthewbrooks1556]

When she says “all those women”, as in “Amber feels so sorry for all those women”, it sounds so hollow… like it’s just a sound bite for them. And that is truly sickening. I have a feeling Amber could not care less about “all those women”. And Elaine here is trying to salvage something, anything, from the wreckage of her destroyed reputation.

[@elizabethbrammer7022]

I’m a DV survivor and now a family law attorney…. As an attorney, I cannot FATHOM going on a press tour (like Elaine) after such a short period of time… I can understand the need to buy into your client’s version of events in order to go to trial on a case, but then to take ZERO time to reflect on what she could’ve done differently speaks volumes to me… I need weeks, even months, after a short trial in order to dissociate from advocacy and to go back into logic mode and think through what I could’ve done differently. As a DV survivor (although I prefer to call it a post-thriver) I saw through every second of AH’s testimony and could identify 100% with JP’s version of events. Those marks? It’s called defensive wounds. Anyone and everyone ever physically assaulted is going to fight back in some way, shape, or form. AH was so transparent and obvious in her attempted manipulation of the situation it made me sick. I’m so glad the truth is out there now, and I hope other survivors are not disheartened by this verdict. The TRUTH WON HERE!!!

[@byusaranicole]

That's exactly my issue: Amber Heard and her team will not admit to ANY fault despite clear evidence that she has done some despicable things. Johnny is no Saint. At all. Those text messages were B. A. D. But at least he didn't try to make himself out to be perfect like Amber has.

[@SukiZoe]

It was public, so that the world could see the truth. And we did.

[@piano88doc]

Elaine should remember that Amber stated on the stand, under oath, she wrote it about Johnny. Great reaction!

[@Eleanore.Rigbyy]

I’m so uncomfortable with the fact that they are making her scenario about abuse against women. As far as I’m aware Amber has been physically and verbally abusive in her relationship with a woman. I don’t think it’s fair to paint her in the same brush as all female victims.

[@narushini704]

Maybe her case is different. But their relationship was toxic, they were both abusers. But somehow she is the only bad person in most peoples eyes even though there was evidence for both of them being abused by one another. That kind of shows how women are having it more difficult as JD is painted as a victim and an angel whereas AH is painted as the abusive, toxic liar. Both lied, both abused but the outcome for them is different and it is different how they are see. I don't get it. That's bias

[@Myst9066]

@@narushini704 I think it’s more because of the fact Johnny never denied or hid from his faults. Amber can’t take responsibility for any of her actions. Nothing is her fault and everyone is lying but her.

[@AvengeTheTRexOfSteel]

@@narushini704 the difference is, Amber was the main abuser. Amber was the one physically abusing Johnny. Amber was the one constantly picking fights.

[@alexisstrother]

@@Myst9066 exactly, she lied on the stand multiple times & her testimony basically was, “every single witness aside from myself are all liars,” AFTER lying on the stand herself! Even her own witnesses testimony contradicted hers! I doubt the person you were responding to even watched the full trial based on their comment. & I was never a fan of Johnny. Sadly, I was a fan of Amber…before this trial.

[@AppleStrawberryLove]

@@narushini704 Abuse functions off of a power imbalance. It cannot go both ways; one has to hold the control. If a victim lashes out with anger, violence, or words, that is not abuse. It's a human reaction to pain. It's pretty clear you didn't watch the entire trial. You should and take special note of some of the details of whom Johnny is speaking to when he's the nastiest. Let me out it this way: I will talk poorly of my abusive father... to everyone except him. Why? Because I know that even if I'm away from him, that will absolutely set him off.

[@simonmorrison8570]

"Is there anything you think you could have done better?" "Oh yes, I'm only human but they were threatening to put her baby in the microwave" WTF?!! It's like she had a list of things she wanted to say and would just slot them in randomly to any answer. They need to stop enabling Amber before she talks herself into more trouble.

[@elenhin]

It's a huge setback for liars, but a great victory for abuse victims. Btw love your stuff so much!!!!

[@SocialExperiment232]

How she hasn’t been fired by the court after she accused them of “suppressing” evidence on purpose and having some sort of biased towards Johnny, not to mention accusing the whole jury of breaking their oath, and continuing to defame the person to who she just lost making her look like a petty, unprofessional, sore loser, is beyond me. How can she sit there with her face and say “I absolutely believe that these two exact same pieces of film are two different pictures, I absolutely believe she was repeatedly punched in the face by a man wearing giant rings in every finger and only got a shadow below her eye, I absolutely believe she wasn’t taking about him when she directly said to him “I didn’t punch you I was hitting you” and the famous “tell everyone you’re a man and a victim of domestic violence and see if they believe you”. How can lawyers lie like this?!?!

[@IratePuffin]

She’s doing it all to prepare for the appeal.

[@Jaggededge112]

I’ve heard that she may be disbarred for her unprofessional behavior and commentary. I don’t know if it’s true so don’t quote me.

[@myheartismadeofstars]

@@Jaggededge112 🙏🍀

[@JaimeLee0555]

It’s shocking isn’t it? I thought it was hilarious when she canceled her interview with court tv at the last minute due to a “court emergency”. I bet Judge A was like get your butt back here. We need to have some words. 😂

[@JaimeLee0555]

@@Jaggededge112 I wouldn’t doubt it. I mentioned in my comment below that she canceled her interview with court tv for a court emergency

[@DeadSezSo]

If you notice, when "Elaine" gets pressed on why amber wasn't believed after claiming it was because johnny was a celebrity, she stopped dead in her tracks and looked like a deer in headlights before motioning like an actual robot. I wish you'd have highlighted this unnatural looking behavior. After being pressed like that, she moved on, not to another reason she thought amber wasn't believed, but to the next bullet point she had prepared that she used in both of her interviews. "Well you have to remember this was a tale of two trials." WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT "ELAINE"?! That has nothing to do with the question! Her lack of preparedness for being asked hard-hitting questions mirrors her lack of preparedness in the trial and the arrogance and entitlement of her and amber expecting people to just take their word for things and not question them.

[@aidagomes8119]

Without a shred of doubt 🧐

[@ImAtYourMumsHouse]

Great break down of this observation, thank you

[@dianecharest8365]

Yes EXACTLY

[@MommyTiffany]

Before watching this video in it's entirety, I really want to say something. I was called for jury duty this week. I was selected as a group of 20 to go into a courtroom for the jury selection process. I was then selected to join a jury. As of yesterday I'm now allowed to talk about the case. We were to decide if the defendant had committed 4th degree assault. In the beginning, we heard testimony from the alleged victim, the ex girlfriend of the defendant. Then we heard an audio recording of a 911 call. Then we heard testimony from 2 separate police officers. The defendant declined to take the stand. From the discrepancies in the ex girlfriend's story and the police officers stories, I was the sole member of the jury on the first day of deliberations to call him not guilty. On day 2 of deliberations I had a couple of people on my side, with the discrepancies and the lack of evidence, and the letter of the law as written in the instructions from the judge to us as jurors. On the third and final day of deliberation, we were split 4 saying not guilty, 2 saying guilty, and we presented to the judge that we did not think that even given a reasonable time period we would ever all agree unanimously. We were a hung jury. We were released. At the end of the case, the judge said we could talk to the attorneys if we wanted to or we could leave and we all stayed to talk for a bit. At one point one of the jurors asked if we could talk to the defendant and he said it was ok if he was ok with it. We were getting told to leave so that they could clean the courtroom and I and another juror were talking to the defendant as we were leaving and I asked what happened to him now, if he didn't mind my asking and he said they could file for a retrial within 90 days. I said something about "what was the deal with the shoes?" Because in part of the testimony from his ex she had said there were shoes all over the floor. He told me there weren't. She made it up. Then he proceeded to tell me a story about what happened from his side. His side made so much sense. It lined up with the police officers testimony. It filled in the missing gaps in the story. I told him if they go back to trial, he should work on his confidence to tell his story with his attorney because without a doubt if we had heard that story, the deliberations would have gone a completely different way. The prosecution was using his height and size vs her height and size as something to look at. The police arrested him because he was the man in the argument. The presumption that because someone is a male, because someone is larger, that automatically makes them a threat... It needs to stop existing. He was being abused by her in his story. His timeline of events lined up with the police officers while hers didn't. If he'd testified, I've already said this but I'll say it again, there is zero doubt in my mind if he'd told the story he told me yesterday evening in the courtroom we would have all found him not guilty.

[@TR4zest]

Interesting story. I am surprised you jurors did a tally of guilty / not even after the firsy day.

[@SassySmall1]

As a survivor of SA Amber Heard does not represent me. And Elaine doesn't represent justice for me. I still struggle to talk about my experience and even just saying his name makes me feel sick. Even as I am making this comment I want to cry and wash away his touch even though it has been years. I wish I had Camille Vasquez or Ben Chew to confront my ex with what he did, but seeing two specifically felt like I got the justice I never did.

[@Nobody-dp5xo]

I CAN NOT WAIT to see your response to Amber's interview. She just cant go away it seems.

[@Brooksie603]

I understand that Elaine was trying to put out the fires raging over her client's loss but she did her no favors doing those interviews whatsoever. If anything, she made it worse. She dodged questions and pointed fingers and blamed literally everyone involved in the case that it was their fault that Amber lost when in fact it was her client's lies that made her lose the case. I don't know of anyone who was in a domestic abuse relationship that purposely egged on their partner to fight if they were afraid of them. The last thing you do is try to engage in a fight and chase them down, bang on doors and get in their face, and not let them leave a room. The person who leaves the room to avoid a fight and locks themselves into another room to avoid a fight is the abused person. That is what he had to do to get away from her. I know because I was in that situation before. She LIED and tried to screw him over because she didn't get what she wanted from him while they were together and got caught. Period. I feel bad that it took this long for everyone to believe it and all the skeletons had to come out of the closet. No one wants to admit to the literal world how bad of a substance issue you had but it was the only way to get his life back. All I want to see is that they both can just leave each other alone (mainly her because she's the lying instigator) and get on with their lives. He can go back to his great movie roles and rock out with his friends on tour and maybe she can just grow up and focus on being a good mom and role model for her daughter. Being a teenage bully doesn't fit for a 30-something-year-old woman.

[@thatsalt1560]

I believe she needs treatment for her personality disorder. She could be very relevant, but not as a victim of abuse, but as a person who dares to talk openly about suffering from a personality disorder, and healing from it. She could help a lot of people. It won't happen, of course, but it would be nice.

[@mj6962]

I’m just glad the hosts are calling her on her B.S. Also, I loved how Amber would be talking to her attorney and smile or even chuckle in the conversation, but then as soon as the attorney walks away, Amber remembers to put her “sad face” back on. lol. Its obvious and noticeable. And funny. Very telling.

[@rahbeeuh]

It was publicly done because JD wanted his story to be told and he wanted the public to know he's innocent of the heinous acts that he was being accused of. Also, Nate-the former NFL player-was SO ON POINT!!!

[@annegallagher4005]

Elaine has lost her Lawyer credibility and turned into a lying Fanatic for the cause... disgusting!

[@heatherleightruecrimecomingOct]

Amber wouldn't even admit to not donating money to charity. She couldn't take accountability for anything. They wouldn't even bring up Amber's phone records. Ugh🙄

[@TH-dg2mm]

Of course Depp's lawyers refused. It's called class.

[@ceeella7215]

Indeed. Going for media interviews the day after would have definitely been classless on his teams part. But it was smart to go and respond/address Amber's lawyers comments afterwards.

[@tiffanymorgan228]

Did Elaine ever ask herself WHY there were (almost) ONLY Depp fans outside the court...?

[@venteuse]

One of the lawyers who attended the hearings says he spoke to an AH supporter both before and after the days testimony from AH. She was very upset leaving the court because she went in believing and came out feeling she'd been lied to and taken advantage of.

[@Bamgeutcutiepie]

Plus amber ended up saying it WAS about him. On her last day of rebuttal. This was such poor taste. Johnny team’s interviews were so classy.

[@Jaggededge112]

She said that it was about him a few times while in the stand.

[@lyantombing1157]

Im starting to get irritated recently whenever someone, whether it's someone who agree with depp or heard or neutral or those who simply don't care, say that " He/she is guilty, but they were both ab***ve to each other"....im like, wtf? I mean, she's the one who's guilty of physical abus**e so I don't understand why people say he is also abusive to her verbally too cause what do they expect him to do? Just sit there, take all the verbal and the physical abuse and just keep quiet and hide every single time and not do anything to vent off his frustration? It was clear that he did throw things, not at people though, he did talk back, he did shout and drink and do drugs and had tantrums from time to time, but after seeing and listening to how she taunted, beat and tortured him mentally while fcking him up more by constantly convincing him that she loves him and using the man's feelings for her to leech off of him even after all the abuse that she did.

[@UBwalkswiththeKing]

I absolutely abhor Amber for crowning herself the spokesperson for DV and SA victims. I am a survivor of both and do not consider her to stand for me. I would bet money that most survivors feel the same. I was raised by a malignant narcissistic, alcoholic mother and watching AH triggered me severely. My mother was a very beautiful woman who destroyed my father, wrecked countless marriages, manipulated everyone around her and gaslighted me until I thought I was going insane. Her verbal and physical abuse left deep scars that I will carry for the rest of my days. AH is the mirror to this behavior and I knew her kind from the beginning. Children have strong intuition and can quickly identify when someone is a potential threat. I wish Johnny would have listened to Lilly Rose. She had AH's number from the first.

[@spooky-spaghetti]

thank u for speaking out about how egregious it is for amber and her team to act like the representation of women and victims. it's comments like urs that r important for breaking down her disgusting narrative.

[@kathyturner6177]

Let’s face it Amber had no evidence. My sister in law was killed by her husband and he died in prison and going through that I learned so much about abuse and I this case Amber was the abuser. Sure Amber said she was sorry come on. You know she yelled at her lawyers for the lose.

[@ARC-0606]

I'm so sorry for your loss. I know those words won't bring her back. She never deserved that. You never deserved that as for her husband he definitely did. It's not acceptable what he did.

[@TR4zest]

There were lots of naughty, shouty words from AH, I am sure.

[@samanthamorris427]

Logan this has made my day. You always throw facts and logic on the media dumpster fire.

[@Katie.Griffin]

How did you watch the video so quickly when he just posted it? Lol 😆 hmmm 🤔 Like seconds after...

[@claranadine1086]

@@Katie.Griffin they didn't say they watched all of it yet! Just the fact that he posted something today made their day better haha

[@samanthamorris427]

Katie Griffin I’m speaking of his past videos as well

[@ayadiefair]

@@Katie.Griffin Patreon gets early releases of videos.

[@ohlookitsmaria]

As a former victim of domestic violence who was almost killed on more than one occasion by my ex husband, I find the fact that Amber and her lawyer use this "setback" statement as if speaking for all women who were ever in an abusive relationship. I am not a big Johnney Depp fan but I followed the trial and I just honestly thought Amber was full of shit. I also think they were toxic for each other but I don't think he's a wife beater. He won, I thought he should win in this case and no I don't feel this causes any kind of setback in regards to victims of domestic violence especially when men can also be victims and this may encourage some to speak up as well.

[@TR4zest]

It was a setback for liars, though.

[@ohlookitsmaria]

@@TR4zest I agree!!

[@commonsense571]

🌱🌷🌱

[@TheBridgeBookclub]

Agree! It is so disturbing how they just don’t respect anyone, and they actually, Very much, insult our intelligence.

[@mommajesus657]

I think people need to realize and remember that, before this trial, everyone believed Amber. It wasn't until the evidence came out that people started swaying Depps direction. That alone tells you it's not about social status, fame, etc.

[@thunderrage1]

My point of view is that Elaine is trying to do some damage control for herself. Johnny's team, especially Camille, made her very frustrated, flustered and embarrassed. Not the celebrated lawyer that her firm profile speaks to. This whole thing is Elaine trying to clean up her image.

[@ceelow1073]

💯 Not everyone is cut out for the courtroom….she does not have the skill set required for a trial lawyer. I think she feels exposed and humiliated…and I think she took all the social media banter about her personally and that’s why she’s so angry about it.

[@rvrotter1]

It’s not helping her at all. She should just stay!

[@regerde2711]

Depps team fought hard to get this trial televised so the public could form their own opinion as he is an actor and relies on public opinion. Even if the Jury believes that Amber is the abuser they still could have decided it was not evident that the op ed was about Depp. It's really hard to actually win a defamation case. If he lost all the world would only know that fact but with the public nature people could see for themselves that Amber is a liar. Everyone got the chance to form their own opinion so that Depp, even if he lost the defamation trial, would still have cleared his name.

[@Lili-cc7pz]

this was debunked. its actually Judge A who ordered it to be televised. Team Depp agreed, team Heard did not

[@Penguinandpear]

It was actually the judge who wanted cameras in court to reduce the impact of the media and public on the courthouse. Jd side agreed to it, ah didn’t

[@ToxicallyMasculinelol]

"this is the first time a victim of abuse had to testify with cameras" Uh, no it's not. Amber is not a victim of abuse. The whole point of the trial was to find out if she really WAS a victim of abuse, and the jury ruled that she WASN'T

[@dalehammers4425]

This is the part that amazes me most, Amber's claims were never actually proven, just spoken. The only one with an actual court decision on the issue between them is Johnny.

[@marie_84]

Does her lawyer didn't heard in court that AH has a histrionic personality disorder??? And BPD? That alone, should explain a lot....🤷‍♀️ 🤦‍♀️ 🤦‍♀️

[@amanda_who8307]

At this point Johnny needs to sue this lady for defamation… like wtf

[@kaywren73]

AH SHOULD be sorry to all these women (DV survivors). She DID let them down. By making false claims, taking on the role of survivor and weaponizing it. She owes humanity an apology.

[@belle.m]

Sorry, but I honestly think you have been way too easy on Amber Heard. And way to easy on Elaine. All I saw during this interview was someone who was bitter that she lost, and tried to blame everyone except herself and Amber. And anyone who watched this trial, even in part, could see that Amber as a witness was unreliable and her lawyers were scattered and unprepared. I know you don’t want to take sides and want to be impartial, but there was very little evidence that there was abuse on Johnny’s part, and he admitted to everything. Beyond verbal arguments that every couple has, usually instigated by her, he never took his anger out on her. Also, evidence wasn’t suppressed, it was deemed irrelevant to the case, plus there were no medical records that existed. I picked up all these lies just from this short interview. Very surprised that her constant head shaking of ‘no’ while she sprouted these lies was not picked up.

[@TR4zest]

I think the evidence Elaine was referring to was deemed inadmissible (self reporting to a therapist - also NOT a medical record). On the other hand, the recording of AH admitting to throwing the vodka bottle that injured JD's hand was also inadmissable because a third person was on that tape who has since died and thus unable to give permission for the recording to be heard in court. Also, AH never won the London court case, the Sun tabloid won.

[@kaineandrews3790]

@@TR4zest The Sun won, indeed. The facts that there were no cameras to record exactly what was said, that the judge has familial ties to the Sun’s affiliates, that it was solely decided by a judge rather than a jury are all interesting addendums to that.

[@TR4zest]

@@kaineandrews3790 Yes, in the UK, criminal trials have a jury, civil cases do not. The judge seems to have made many surprising decisions that hampered JD's case.

[@Jillcupples]

WOW !!! She is draining 😞

[@amandamandamands]

I am glad that the trial was streamed, the articles that were coming out about it every day were very pro Amber (I'm in Australia and it was even the case here). Part of the reason for the slant is that The Sun is owned by Murdoch who also owns a decent portion of Australian MSM. If I hadn't of seen it I would have been very confused by the verdict or if they hadn't of found for Johnny the news media would have been that justice prevailed without knowing any of the actual facts of the case.

[@natho6235]

"An enormous of evidence..." but they had no proof in court lol

[@Tattooedgaymer]

Love how she can't admit that their team are partially to blame. They looked like they had never been to a trial before.

[@dalehammers4425]

They called in witnesses that literally sided with Johnny lol.

[@citadelofwinds1564]

The way AH's team conducted themselves in court was so cringeworthy. Elaine was the worst of them - she was rude, obnoxious, argumentative for the sake of being argumentative, unprepared, made unforced errors, and was even disrespectful towards the judge. So no surprise kept carrying on with her bad behaviour in these interviews. AH basically picked someone much like herself - and Elaine sides with her because they are birds of a feather.

[@orchid9173]

Can’t say I’m shocked that AH’s team also don’t take accountability and use insidious arguments to try and twist things to their favour. But everyone knows now and it won’t work. The tale of two trials argument irritates me so much. They were not the same trial. In the uk AH was a witness, the question was about if the sun had enough evidence to believe what they printed was true, it wasn’t about the actual truth. a lot less evidence came into that trial, the judge dismissed a lot of JDs arguments because of his drug use, and also heavily favored AH because they thought she had donated the money and it came out after the trial she hadn’t. So she lied there too. They are not the same trial, AH didn’t win because she wasn’t a party. They are completely misrepresenting it and it’s gross.

[@90charmedndangerous]

Yeah plus the judge had strong ties to the sun/murdoch so he was very biased

[@orchid9173]

@@90charmedndangerous oh yes I forgot that, good point.

[@laron2239]

Yes! Well summarized.

[@brittanycoulter5000]

My understanding for the cameras in the courtroom: Johnny’s team requested them. I believe they didn’t want the mainstream media to be able to 100% control the narrative. Supposedly they were getting a lot of requests about attending the trail and Judge A though this would help. I’ve also heard generally if either party requests camera then cameras happen.

[@olhydra]

And seeing the way the media, Amber and her team have grossly misrepresented the facts, twisted the narrative and refused to acknowledge the truth, I’m so grateful the trial was televised.

[@AstoricaArt]

Yes, that's what I read too. Amber's team supposedly fought against the cameras but Judge A decided to allow them, bless her

[@Jaggededge112]

I thought it was a great idea actually. We got to see the way Amber acted throughout the trial.

[@JB_Fraulein_Kunst]

Considering how mainstream media is clearly not reporting the facts of what actually happened, it's such a good job this was televised. I like many other watched the full thing and was able to form my own opinion without outside influence (yet annoyingly, those who did not watch the trial, just point the finger and say you must be a JD stan)

[@venteuse]

It was the Judge herself who made the motion to televise the trial. Depp's side did not object, Heards side did. The Judge heard their responses and granted her own motion (as is her right) to go ahead and televise

[@Kathie4]

Blackbelt Barrister has a series of videos on the UK case. He even has a petition for the court to re examine/appeal the judge's decision. It's much more complicated than Elaine & the media would have you believe.

[@SiminaDar]

Johnny wanted it to be televised so people could see the truth. It was specifically designed that even if he lost the case, people would be able to make their own conclusions based on the evidence.

[@AlyssLysie]

Ugh.. amber didn't turn over her "mountain of evidence ".. no meta data from her phone or photos. This lawyer spouts such lies! You had 6 years to turn over that evidence and you didn't..

[@Slinky_Loki1967]

Initially during the trial I almost felt bad for Elaine. I thought, "Wow, she got handed a shit case where Amber is clearly lying and Elaine has to try and construct a viable trial from this web of lies Amber has gotten them into. She's working with a failing case and trying to maintain her dignity as a lawyer." Now, I see that she is just as deluded as Amber is to think that the jury is so stupid as to not be able to form their own opinions about what happened when presented the evidence. I'm a woman who has been fortunate to never be abused, and yes, I think both Johnny and Amber were abusive/toxic in the relationship, but Amber is clearly worse, and to act like Amber is some martyr for women is disgusting.

[@dalehammers4425]

Elaine wasnt "handed" anything, shes not a public defendant that cant say no. She chose to take this case.

[@Slinky_Loki1967]

@@dalehammers4425 No, I realize. I suppose what I meant was that while she chose the case and could have walked away from it, she chose to continue the case but the case she got from the choice she made was a shit show. Like I said, it was only initially during the trial and a couple of clips where I sort of felt bad for her, but seeing how she's speaking about the case changed that sliver of compassion I might have had for her.

[@lillymurray8408]

I personally think Amber has put her up to saying certain things. Especially in this interview.

[@dalehammers4425]

@@Slinky_Loki1967 Once you start you have to get the courts permission to leave. You cant just abandon a client mid-trial without permission. Now she actually did meet those requirements, but imho she stayed hoping for that MASSIVE pay-day if Amber won. I also felt bad for her before her tv appearances. She quickly absolved me of that notion however.

[@dalehammers4425]

@@lillymurray8408 Of course she has, if she wants paid Amber has to win an appeal. -$8,000,000 doesnt pay lawyer fees too well.

[@Selene_Rosara]

Amber Heard's friend lied to her attorneys about one of the witnesses and got her testimony stricken from the record. The same friend who was banned from the courtroom for not following the judge's rules about using cellphones in the court. They tried everything they could to discredit Johnny Depp and the fact that they are still slinging mud at him after losing in court shows the kind of character they and/or their client has. I will admit I haven't seen the interview done by Johnny's lawyers yet but I doubt they started bashing Amber Heard even though they just proved in court that she is a liar.

[@sdh4557]

Depp’s attorneys have just done interviews. They were classy and waited a few days. They also were classy in the interviews.

[@allison257]

You should watch their interviews, well spoken and respectful.

[@emmaashburn3373]

Elaine: they don't have any evidence. They: *literally have audio recording of Amber saying she hit Johnny*

[@HollieAndApollo]

Absolutely love your videos! Thank you for taking the time to make these! :)

[@beatitcreep.]

I feel like the very rare people who side up with Amber never listened to the recordings. She ridiculed him for claiming he was a victim of DV simply because he's a man. She admitted to initiating physical fights. What victim of DV would initiate a physical fight with their abuser? She's the setback for women, the verdict isn't. I don't even understand how Elaine is allowed to keep claiming Johnny Depp abused Amber on national TV when the evidence has proven the opposite. She doesn't have a verdict to support her claims. It's upsetting.

[@dalehammers4425]

She is so setting herself up for her own defamation case... by not only Johnny but the judge and jury as well. She is literally accusing them all of misconduct.

[@beatitcreep.]

@@dalehammers4425 Exactly! It's been proven before a court of law that the op-ed was defamatory... but the defamation is still going on. Her appeal hasn't been allowed yet as far as I know!

[@juliannacolombo5584]

Yes! Fantastic video choice! This woman is an embarrassment !

[@AzariaSin]

I really tried to not be hard on her because I knew she had a difficult client. And especially felt sympathy for Amber's legal team when she threw them (predictably) under the bus. This has gone too far though. All Elaine had to do was shut her mouth if she wanted to preserve her reputation. A simple "I'm disappointed with the verdict" would've been 100% ok. As to why she would go so hard for someone who put her legal team on the spot is beyond me. Gotta appreciate her conviction, at least...

[@AstoricaArt]

I think it would probably harm her reputation more to come out against Amber at this point, you don't want to be known as the lawyer that talks bad about your clients after they lose. Would probably make it hard to get more clients, if that makes sense Not that I like Elaine or anything. Just think she's damned either way at this point, she should have never done any interviews to start with

[@duhhnielle03]

@@AstoricaArt she doesn’t have to go hard against Amber. Like the commenter said “I’m disappointed in the verdict” is plenty enough to say without bashing Amber. But the fact that she’s going to bat for Amber after everything is weird.

[@Cove_Blue]

​@@duhhnielle03 Especially doing the rounds on TV. Almost feels like she has some underlying motivation for taking on Amber as a client.

[@citadelofwinds1564]

Elaine is the only lawyer among AH's lawyers who started doing the interview rounds. The others seem way smarter and are keeping a low profile. Elaine comes across as sour grapes, bitter, and refusing to look at her own incompetent behaviours during the trial. She has chosen to keep supporting a proven liar, abuser and perjurer. Looks like AH was successful in gaslighting her. Now Elaine will be forever remembered as AH's flying monkey.

[@kaineandrews3790]

@@Cove_Blue It is strange, isn’t it? Also strange how many power players are sticking in Heard’s corner, being passive-aggressive regarding the verdict (I’m looking at you, Washington Post) or outright antagonistic (like the ACLU.) I don’t know what Heard has on people, or what bizarre Poison Ivy-like pheremones she secretes, but it’s certainly strange.

[@supernana7944]

We will never know exactly what happened between those two, but I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that she would have been unrecognizable if any of it had happened the way she described.

[@michellepollington948]

There are huge questions around the UK case and the relationships between the Judge, his family and the owners of the Sun Newspaper I believe