AMD Radeon 890M vs. Intel Arc 140V (Core Ultra 7 258V)

  Рет қаралды 28,154

Hubwood

Hubwood

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 192
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
CORRECTION: The Chart says 780M when it's of course the 890M. Forgot to change the Name. Values are correct though.
@Rayu25Demon
@Rayu25Demon 2 ай бұрын
stop watching ETA Prime you may get stupidity cancer.
@bmqww223
@bmqww223 2 ай бұрын
just change the annoying music , its too loud and punchy , a sooting low volume music would be better for this cases, keep it at dim volume......
@jupiterloverful
@jupiterloverful 2 ай бұрын
correct the description aswell.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
@@bmqww223 No.
@Bokfan_SL
@Bokfan_SL 2 ай бұрын
​@@Hubwoodbased response 🗿
@prem3548
@prem3548 2 ай бұрын
Hopefully Intel keeps improving their drivers. The fact that it can match 890m in some cases is very impressive given just how far behind they were last gen.
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
Meteor Lake was still a massive improvement over their previous generations.
@syedjunaidsher474
@syedjunaidsher474 2 ай бұрын
wow this generation of intel has really pulled something special the performance is similar to 890m despite running at same or lower wattage guess when engineers are hired to run the company rather than accountants you get better results
@GraveUypo
@GraveUypo 2 ай бұрын
i'm just happy that both are viable now
@ramr7051
@ramr7051 2 ай бұрын
Crazy performance for igpus. Sorry graphics cards, you're becoming less relevant for normal people
@Sumire9287
@Sumire9287 2 ай бұрын
It depends. To me it only matters in handhelds and really thin laptops, but these are not necessarily the most cost effective solution, specially the laptop. You can spend so much less and get a dedicated gpu and that way get way more performance for cheaper. That said, I’m glad iGPUs improve, because I love handhelds.
@akin242002
@akin242002 2 ай бұрын
​@alexbraundelacruz9690 But the battery life is usually 3-5 hours max for gaming laptops with a dedicated GPU. These laptops are for working professionals that want some light gaming and good battery life too.
@roqeyt3566
@roqeyt3566 2 ай бұрын
Hard agree Especially with "low end" GPUs suffering more in the long term due to a fixed amount of VRAM Take the APU pill
@Jackpkmn
@Jackpkmn 2 ай бұрын
@@roqeyt3566 Except that people end up with those because they buy cheaper laptops. These powerful igpus will only be in the highest end most expensive cpus. Your $300 shittop will still perform very VERY badly because it won't have this powerful of an igpu. It'll have one cut down to maybe 30% of the performance.
@lemontree5986
@lemontree5986 2 ай бұрын
as soon Igpus can play esport game at 200+fps it over
@akin242002
@akin242002 2 ай бұрын
Whoa! Getting 50+ FPS on Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p resolution from an iGPU is crazy. The AMD Radeon 890M is worth the money for people that have multi-core power needs for work. Fortune 500 programmers using Java primarily. Non-programming engineers will use a dedicated GPU. Battery life isn't as good as Lunar Lake CPUs, but 8 hours of regular use unplugged and 2 hours of gaming use unplugged is still respectable.
@muhd95
@muhd95 2 ай бұрын
He used fsr quality.
@chiaza7735
@chiaza7735 2 ай бұрын
Its not just battery life. Its lower heat and fan noise too
@abaj006
@abaj006 2 ай бұрын
I think if you disable 4 cores and hyper threading on the AMD, you will find it gets just as good battery life as Lunar Lake.
@nocapproductions5471
@nocapproductions5471 2 ай бұрын
​@@abaj006nope, the intel apu is more efficient
@fullerfit93
@fullerfit93 2 ай бұрын
At 30 watts they are similar. Radeon has years of drivers. I wouldnt be surprised if I'm about a year Intel is ahead.
@Khalidd7
@Khalidd7 2 ай бұрын
intel use 3nm also higher memory bandwith 8444 mt/s vs 7500 mt/s and amd use 4nm just wait for 3nm chip (z2 extrem chip) because ryzen AI 370 is 12 core while lunar lake is 8 core dose not consume like 12 core.
@gezimislamaj5309
@gezimislamaj5309 2 ай бұрын
​@@Khalidd7 when will the next ryzen ai chips be released?
@Khalidd7
@Khalidd7 2 ай бұрын
@@gezimislamaj5309 ces
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
@@Khalidd7 The Z2 extreme most likely won't be on 3nm.
@Khalidd7
@Khalidd7 2 ай бұрын
@@rattlehead999 it will be on 3nm because the z1 extreme was on 4 nm also amd delayed the announcement to ces.
@J.Wick.
@J.Wick. 2 ай бұрын
These things have gotten insane. Incredible performance for an igpu. PC handhelds about to take off big big. Glad Intel is worth speaking of in this world again as well. Competition is king
@okestgamer
@okestgamer 2 ай бұрын
Great video! These tests give me some hope for intel to make some progress
@bramtyo1218
@bramtyo1218 2 ай бұрын
Impressive for Igpu now!.. my old laptop R3 5300u (vega 6 igpu) fell slow like amd A series 😂😂 I hope soon can upgrade for my old laptop 🙃
@alderlake12th
@alderlake12th 2 ай бұрын
The chart seems wrong? Also Intel still done better than these UHD/Iris Xe Waiting for the 288V/HX370 at full power The Arc 140V still get a great performance at low power, sometimes beating the HX370 at 50W
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
The Chart says 780M when it's of course the 890M. Forgot to change the Name. Values are correct though. 🙈
@azraeihalim
@azraeihalim 2 ай бұрын
AMD barely have any improvement when going above 35W in this gen APU. Why need to compare 50W AMD with 30W Intel? No body use 50W on the go.
@alderlake12th
@alderlake12th 2 ай бұрын
@@azraeihalim Also that couldn't be fair for that comp
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
@@azraeihalim WHat are you complaining about excactly? :D I also compared it at 20W and 30W? If youre not interested in the 50W just ignore it ;) But I wanted to show the maximum performance. No nobody will use 50W on the go. But if it's plugged in, people will use that of course.
@azraeihalim
@azraeihalim 2 ай бұрын
@@Hubwood yes but comparing adding 50W results just waste of time as laptop mean to be on the go. Even on a plug wall, 50W doesn't give significant improvement that worth extra fan noise and heat. It will be much better adding results 15W or 10W. To see how much performance we could get during power saving or silent fan mode.
@ramadona5864
@ramadona5864 Ай бұрын
love to see this competition,between amd and intel, next will be curious to see ARM vs x86 in game, video editing or 3d aplication
@djayjp
@djayjp 2 ай бұрын
What laptop was used for the 890m? Also the Zenbook S14? My understanding is the S16 version is power limited, but (oddly enough) not the S14 version. Not sure about Vivobook version.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Vivobook S14
@Loczek531
@Loczek531 2 ай бұрын
@@Hubwood Unfortunately Vivobook performs noticeably above average for 890m, Zenbook vs Zenbook would be pretty much equal
@openboxtherapy1010
@openboxtherapy1010 5 күн бұрын
a bit of a tangent but specifically for handhelds, which do you predict would perform better, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V in the MSI Claw AI or the Z2 extreme in the upcoming Lenovo Legion GO2?
@061_arsh
@061_arsh Ай бұрын
Well presented! 🎉
@Hubwood
@Hubwood Ай бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@pmatias
@pmatias 2 ай бұрын
Is Intel scaling better with the watts?
@roqeyt3566
@roqeyt3566 2 ай бұрын
In part yes, but AMD has a higher ceiling so it will overtake it if you juice it enough The thing with intel on low wattages is that it also uses that wattage for memory, whilst AMD gives power to that separately. 20w AMD is basically 17-18w intel, if you do watt for watt
@pmatias
@pmatias 2 ай бұрын
@@roqeyt3566 lets see in 30w consoles, ive seen other reviews 30W where Intel wins, idk what I can pick of this
@TonLopChanhNY
@TonLopChanhNY 2 ай бұрын
amd 4nm, inteo 3nm
@discerningcucumber7559
@discerningcucumber7559 2 ай бұрын
@@roqeyt3566 isn't it ultra 7 ultra 9 should perform equal
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
@@discerningcucumber7559 They do
@handlemonium
@handlemonium 2 ай бұрын
Overclocked* Radeon 890M @ 89W vs GTX 1060 or RX 480 at some point? 🙏 *(+500Mhz on LPDDR5X-7500, +200Mhz on 890M boost clock, and "unlocked" 89W power limit via Universal x86 Tuning Utility on the Beelink SER9 or similar)
@rafradeki
@rafradeki 2 ай бұрын
Mobile igpu is not overclockable
@handlemonium
@handlemonium 2 ай бұрын
@@rafradeki Yeah not normally, but go watch ETA Prime's video and report back.
@UserUsing2
@UserUsing2 Ай бұрын
what is the dedicated GPU memory used for 890m? (since it can be increased up to 8GB with "Variable-Graphics Memory" in AMD software
@notmuzammil
@notmuzammil 27 күн бұрын
POV: Everyone thinks both CPUs provide the same kind of performance until you see the RAM usage
@alephmoments7519
@alephmoments7519 6 күн бұрын
Some kids never understand that Gpu will not never death also Ryzen ai 9 hx is very expensive and if we make a pc from that price which that laptop is coming on that price we easily make a pc with rtx 4060ti
@mmkm_yt8074
@mmkm_yt8074 2 ай бұрын
Could you also test if it can run ghost of tsushima?
@roqeyt3566
@roqeyt3566 2 ай бұрын
Do the wattages presume package power or just CPU power? Since LNL has on-die memory, it accounts for a lil 2w of the package power
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Package power!
@SY-zv2cz
@SY-zv2cz 2 ай бұрын
Intel's package power also includes memory, so at 20 W package power it may not be sending enough power to the iGPU. Maybe they need to tweak the power sharing algorithm a little more for gaming.
@tobfon2416
@tobfon2416 Ай бұрын
Cant wait for the new handhels. It is head to head at 30W
@bugisuhana1365
@bugisuhana1365 26 күн бұрын
conclusion is start at 11:21
@testlan7765
@testlan7765 2 ай бұрын
Igpu is crazy now. ❤❤❤❤
@kendicloud
@kendicloud 2 ай бұрын
have they reached like a 3050 discrete laptop performance already?
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Close for the low power version. Not yet in all cases.
@mariopenulli1395
@mariopenulli1395 2 ай бұрын
Why do you sometimes use upscaling and sometimes you don't? Would have been better with the same settings across all games.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Because some people want upscaling and some don't, so there's something for everyone.
@facemcshooty9274
@facemcshooty9274 2 ай бұрын
these igpu,s are great , whats not so great is that most handhelds , mini pc,s won,t have a cooling solution to support higher tdp,s , to get the most out of these fantastic mobile chips , Gm Tek has announced a mini pc with a bigger then normal cooling solution , sporting a HX 375 , that should be the trend to get the most out of these chips , instead of the 15 -54 Watts tdp , build a bigger/thiccer mini pc/laptop haha , rawrr
@Ali-ue2mo
@Ali-ue2mo 2 ай бұрын
What laptop was used to test 890M?
@warlockboyburns
@warlockboyburns Ай бұрын
if 80wh batteries is the new baseline for handhelds then it might be worth putting arc in new handhelds.
@Doblejesungly886
@Doblejesungly886 13 күн бұрын
and how does the core 19 ultra 185h run games?
@gezimislamaj5309
@gezimislamaj5309 2 ай бұрын
@Hubwood where did you get these laptops with these CPU in Germany? I haven't seen any available or they're so so overpriced.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Review sample from ASUS.
@정지성-i8z
@정지성-i8z 2 ай бұрын
Memory usage between Intel and Ryzen The difference seems so drastic. Isn't that right?
@NothingNewNerd
@NothingNewNerd 2 ай бұрын
Power difference is bigger, intel is at 30 watts with ram, which consumes about 2-3 watts; so its 28 watt intel vs 50 watt amd
@shremk9100
@shremk9100 2 ай бұрын
It's worth noting that these two chips handle TDP quite differently. The Intel chip's TDP is the total package power, which accounts for everything on the SoC including RAM and WiFi/Bluetooth, whereas it would only be the CPU and GPU power on the AMD chip. As such, if you were to set both TDPs to the same 20W value, the total motherboard power from the AMD laptop would be higher than that of the Intel giving it a smal advantage overall. This is less of an issue at higher TDPs, but for something like a handheld would make a pretty big difference to performance and battery life.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Right, should have mentioned that!
@ozoh8285
@ozoh8285 28 күн бұрын
Intel is doing the same performance jump against amd that amd did to nvidia. Nice to see. Good for all consumers.
@m-b079
@m-b079 2 ай бұрын
Should I buy Zenbook S 14 (Lunar Lake 288v) or Zenbook S 16 (Ryzen 9 AI 370)?
@fpshunter
@fpshunter 2 ай бұрын
If you don’t need more time work you have to get AMD, but Intel is more energy efficient now. So for gaming I’d prefer AMD
@dirtydirtsgt4751
@dirtydirtsgt4751 Ай бұрын
I chose lunar lake for battery life. Performance is great and the igpu is impressive
@Maverick_1887
@Maverick_1887 2 ай бұрын
At the end of the video ....In RDR2 INTEL is giving 54 FPS at just 29W while AMD is giving 53 FPS at double the power OF 60W??
@riyalhai
@riyalhai 2 ай бұрын
Is it good for doing animation work in blender? (Not too heavy or hyper realistic animations)….Currently i work on Mac Mini M2 (8gb/256 gb) and it is doing a pretty good job for me…But for future work will this laptop be useful? Please reply 🙏🏻 PS: I am not tech geek, so if anyone knows please give feedback. thanks.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
If Blender is important I would get a laptop with a dedicated GPU instead...
@Me-eb3wv
@Me-eb3wv 2 ай бұрын
My 12 gen Intel i7 can play the latest AAA single player games at 1080p low @35/40 FPS which is impressive ngl
@x0vg5hs1
@x0vg5hs1 2 ай бұрын
How much is the intel gpu cut down on entry level i3? Is it like amd where ryzen 3 and 5 I gpu is not even worth comparing to 7y old Vega in zen 2 apus?
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
This is not available on i3 Level. There are Core Ultra 5 versions, not core Ultra 3... there is this 140V Version and a slightly slower 130V aswell.
@ZenKnights
@ZenKnights Ай бұрын
from all the lose streak intel had, they just got one big W with this one. i really hope battlemage will make a dent on the marketshare!
@ankitraj-mp5mn
@ankitraj-mp5mn 2 ай бұрын
890M is really something else
@kennytay7210
@kennytay7210 2 ай бұрын
Besides Forza Horizon 5, I feel the frametime graph on the Arc 150V to fluctuate a lot more, which is not a good thing.
@arakainer
@arakainer 2 ай бұрын
Radeon on 50W is super strong
@handlemonium
@handlemonium 2 ай бұрын
Even better @ 89W as shown by ETA Prime
@EthanCarey-p8k
@EthanCarey-p8k 5 күн бұрын
How are thermals at that power?? Particularly in a handheld ..​@@handlemonium
@dajymadashiro
@dajymadashiro 2 ай бұрын
It would be interesting to see the difference between the u7 and u9, despite being a small clock increase and using the same IGPU, the u9 proved to be far superior to the u7.
@Leonardo-hy3qj
@Leonardo-hy3qj Ай бұрын
Hello, really interesting and unique video. How low can tdp get? Would it be possible to test at 17w or even 9w?
@Hubwood
@Hubwood Ай бұрын
Yes that would be possible
@Leonardo-hy3qj
@Leonardo-hy3qj Ай бұрын
@Hubwood i will wait then 🙏
@Hubwood
@Hubwood Ай бұрын
@@Leonardo-hy3qj I'm not saying I'm doing it, I'm saying it's possible 😅 need to see if I have time for that, maxbe a short video
@Leonardo-hy3qj
@Leonardo-hy3qj Ай бұрын
@@Hubwood i know, i know. It would be interesting though, no one did that rn. if you will do the video, i'll gladly do the calculations of efficiency and peff and i'll share them with you and to the viewers as i already did in some of your other videos
@Hubwood
@Hubwood Ай бұрын
Ah what the heck, I'll make a short video comparing a few games at 4 different lower wattages ;)
@ArutoEgo
@ArutoEgo 2 ай бұрын
can test both at 15W?
@PandaMoniumHUN
@PandaMoniumHUN 2 ай бұрын
What machine was used for 890M?
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Asus VivoBook S14. I made a full review about it.
@Thushar_Nambeesan
@Thushar_Nambeesan Ай бұрын
Which laptop is the ryzen one
@Hubwood
@Hubwood Ай бұрын
The 890m.
@varadillath4508
@varadillath4508 2 ай бұрын
Can you please test Dota 2 maximum graphics setting on its native resolution? 2880 by 1800, please 🙏
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
I can quickly add that. Yes. I'm only using live replays though, I don't play it myself. But it should be the same performance since it's rendered out in real time.
@varadillath4508
@varadillath4508 2 ай бұрын
@@Hubwood thank you so much
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
@@varadillath4508 around 55 FPS on average and 40 for the 1% low
@eric131313
@eric131313 2 ай бұрын
Intel done great job with this new igpu
@m-b079
@m-b079 2 ай бұрын
Which one is better for 4k video editing
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Both are capable of doing that alright:)
@m-b079
@m-b079 2 ай бұрын
@@Hubwood Should I buy Zenbook S 14 (Lunar Lake) or Zenbook S 16 (Ryzen 9 Ai 370)?
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
@@m-b079 If you want to run the laptop on battery Lunar Lake, if you want to run it plugged in and don't mind it being warm AI HX370
@mariopenulli1395
@mariopenulli1395 2 ай бұрын
Lunar Lake has the better software support for iGPU acceleration.
@maeltech8038
@maeltech8038 Ай бұрын
Al parecer el punto dulce de loas nuevos core ultra 7 258v son los 30 W mientrras que en los ryzen AI 375 son los 20W
@aymanelzain1271
@aymanelzain1271 2 ай бұрын
Now something like RTX 2050 or even 3050 don't make any sense with those kind of igpu.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Well even the 3050 in the low powered version is still a bit faster, but yeah it's getting close. The advantage of the iGPUs is, that they often can use more VRAM hence use ultra textures without any problems ...
@stephanuswidjaja105
@stephanuswidjaja105 2 ай бұрын
the era of Graphic card End here.. lunar lake, hx370 for the win..
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
What about at 15W?
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
I'd love to test and compare all wattages and multiple settings, but it's just impossible since I don't have the time for that, sorry 😔
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
@@Hubwood Ok, no problem, I was curious.
@izcondoralexander
@izcondoralexander 2 ай бұрын
I wonder what igpu will AMD put in Z2 apu
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
The same as in the HX370, an 890m, but the leaks suggest that it will be 3P + 5C cores to reduce the power draw of the CPU as much as possible, so that the iGPU gets more of the power budget.
@NothingNewNerd
@NothingNewNerd 2 ай бұрын
​@@rattlehead999maybe 5-10% improvement, nothing major, its slightly tweaked
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
@@NothingNewNerd Yup
@Cenkolino
@Cenkolino Ай бұрын
@@NothingNewNerd That 10% can be the difference between stable 60 fps and not. I think, especially with handheld PCs, every percent of extra power counts.
@isahjabea7402
@isahjabea7402 2 ай бұрын
Why does Intel use so much ram?
@doddt2002
@doddt2002 2 ай бұрын
I wonder why we not seen any Intel Core Ultra 9 288V laptops yet? Have heard that chipset is considerably more powerful at gaming frame rates than the Core Ultra 7 258V.
@MLWJ1993
@MLWJ1993 2 ай бұрын
Uhhh, on paper it's just a slight overclock. Nothing truly magical about it, it's the same 8 Xe cores according to Intel specs sheet.
@candycane-xp4yw
@candycane-xp4yw 2 ай бұрын
z2 extreme will perform better than HX370 at low power
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
Yes, the leaks suggest 3P + 5C cores so the iGPU will get a higher power budget.
@ondrejbelan1463
@ondrejbelan1463 19 күн бұрын
why does intel need twice as much RAM?
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 19 күн бұрын
That is not necessarily the "used" ram but the "reserved" ram...
@lightninghell4
@lightninghell4 2 ай бұрын
High FPS tests dont properly test iGPU here since they are becoming CPU limited.
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
No they are not, both CPUs are more than powerful enough for their iGPUs.
@lightninghell4
@lightninghell4 2 ай бұрын
@@rattlehead999 Thats not how that works. The higher the framerate, the harder CPUs have to push draw calls, game logic, physics, etc. GPU is just for rendering. To properly test a GPU, you need a GPU limiting case i.e. high res, high settings.
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
@@lightninghell4 these GPUs are on par with a gtx 1660, are you saying that the Zen5 inside the 370HX isn't strong enough for the gtx 1660 to bottleneck it? A GPU that is weaker than a gtx 1070 which ran on i5 4000 series no problem.
@lightninghell4
@lightninghell4 2 ай бұрын
@@rattlehead999 Depending on the scenario, even a 7800X3D can bottleneck a mid tier GPU. For example, running CSGO at 720 low. The GPU will be able to push out more frames for the 7800X3D to handle. since we know Lunar lake CPU < 370HX, high FPS tests will innaccurately show 370HX winning when in fact both GPUs are roughly on par.
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
@@lightninghell4 at that point you don't care about the bottleneck or the GPU... But he is testing graphically demanding AAA games at 1080p.
@rudrodhali1257
@rudrodhali1257 Ай бұрын
Intel cpu usage is crazy high!!!
@Hubwood
@Hubwood Ай бұрын
That's because the intel onl has 8 cores and 8 threads, that's why it appears "full" quickly. But it won't be a bottleneck in any game really. The iGPU will be the bottleneck in almost all cases.
@SightlyJester
@SightlyJester 2 ай бұрын
I dont trust this comparaison, in all other videos lunar lake beat strix point in Cyberpunk 2077.
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Nope that's not true. See ETAPrime for example
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
Nope that's not true. See ETAPrime for example
@SightlyJester
@SightlyJester 2 ай бұрын
@@Hubwood Another example, for same games that you tested, from one hour ago posted in youtube, total different results: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5iaZZSLhqyXick
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
I can't do anything different than using newest drivers and just test both devices. I don't know how he tested them but I gave the wattage info. Otherwise both ran at highest fan speeds. And haven't checked which laptop he used for 890m. If this are the results for ME who is "pretty familiar" with how to test laptops, I assume this will happen to others as well. Also iGPUs and mobile GPUs are much harder to benchmark than Desktop GPUs as there are just so many factors, driver issues and potential problems. I can only assure you I didn't fake anything here 🤷
@blackdragon4254
@blackdragon4254 2 ай бұрын
Can’t even buy the 32gb and 1tb storage in my country
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
😔
@SightlyJester
@SightlyJester 2 ай бұрын
This video of one hour ago contradicts the results of your video, and also a lot of more videos of september have similar results in this same games: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5iaZZSLhqyXick
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
I can't do anything different than using newest drivers and just test both devices. I don't know how he tested them but I gave the wattage info. Otherwise both ran at highest fan speeds. And haven't checked which laptop he used for 890m. If this are the results for ME who is "pretty familiar" with how to test laptops, I assume this will happen to others as well. Also iGPUs and mobile GPUs are much harder to benchmark than Desktop GPUs as there are just so many factors, driver issues and potential problems. I can only assure you I didn't fake anything here 🤷
@ominousview
@ominousview 2 ай бұрын
Nice comparison. More FPS is one thing but one thing that doesn't come through on these reviews is the graphics quality. Which one handles that better. In my own experience I feel like AMD sacrifices more graphics for FPS vs Nvidia and Intel
@Leonardo-hy3qj
@Leonardo-hy3qj Ай бұрын
at 20w: 890m is 28.3% more efficient on average and has 69.4% more peff than 140v. Both the gpus have peak efficiency at this power level, interestingly at 30w: 890m is 7.07% more efficient, and has 16.2% more peff than 140v
@Unknown3375
@Unknown3375 2 ай бұрын
why intel uses way more ram
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
That's just the wrong display if the VRAM allocation.
@pamus6242
@pamus6242 2 ай бұрын
The key here is LPDDR5X. Without it Intel and AMD would be nowhere. This is the real reason ARM is winning/won.
@rattlehead999
@rattlehead999 2 ай бұрын
The problem is that AMD and Intel have only dual channel/128 bit bus width. If they had a 192-256 bit bus width/tri-quad channel memory they'd match and beat a rtx 3050
@odidibassey
@odidibassey 2 ай бұрын
Radeon is cooler and faster
@faizannabi7540
@faizannabi7540 Ай бұрын
Intel is way behind just like amd is behind from nvidia.
@雲雲星
@雲雲星 2 ай бұрын
AMD YES!!
@odidibassey
@odidibassey 2 ай бұрын
Radeon 890M igpu trashed Intel 🔥✨
@ausejoski
@ausejoski 2 ай бұрын
I see it amd is weaker because you put it against intels 2nd to the highest cpu on the series.. it should be against the ultra 9 not ultra 7.
@theviniso
@theviniso 2 ай бұрын
Does the ultra 9 have a better iGPU than the ultra 7?
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
No. Same GPU, same number of cores. Only slightly higher CPU clock speed.
@ausejoski
@ausejoski 2 ай бұрын
@@Hubwood but the GPU clock speed is also different..
@Hubwood
@Hubwood 2 ай бұрын
@@ausejoski by 100Mhz yes. Good luck finding a laptop with the core ultra 9 yet though ;)
Intel ARC B580 - обзор новинки.
23:28
RHW - RuHardWare
Рет қаралды 28 М.
Andro, ELMAN, TONI, MONA - Зари (Official Audio)
2:53
RAAVA MUSIC
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
I Built A $100 Hyper Budget Gaming PC!
16:51
Budget Bin
Рет қаралды 299 М.
How Bad is This $10,000 PC from 10 Years Ago??
22:00
Linus Tech Tips
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН