America Before Columbus - They came by Sea | Full History Documentary - Part 2

Part 2 of the "America Before Columbus" series examines Columbus’ arrival in the Americas and how Europe benefited. The introduction of European flora and fauna to America changed the landscape and diet forever. As the wild continent became a second Europe, the native population was devastated by smallpox and plague.
--
Welcome to the official Get.factual youtube channel! 🌍
We are a documentary streaming channel covering history, science, technology, and nature. Explore worlds distant, forgotten, and unknown; from the depths of ocean trenches to the far reaches of the cosmos.
New uploads of full-length documentaries and docu-series every week!
Subscribe here: bit.ly/Getfact...

[@joshhoffman1975]

The is a very interesting and innovative series, taking terrific new angles on old well known topics! 👍😃🤩

[@ronnronn55]

This is more about Europeans coming to America than "America Before Columbus". Misleading, disappointing. Although well done for what it is.

[@get.factual]

Sorry that the title is misleading. But we're glad you still liked the documentary!

[@RobTheFossil]

Surprised that critical race theory looks a bit silly against this documentary? All the tribes here and in sub-Saharan Africa were still in the stone age of development before colonials arrived with the Word and education. Until colonials arrived all the tribes lived apart and hated each other. Fought against, plundered and took slaves of each others women and children. Separate nations/tribes who claimed separate land zones and lived apart. Colonials brought them together in the end as one nation. Stone age met advanced science and technology and was given education available for thousands of years in Europe. Shall I continue? Perhaps colonials took over existing schools?

[@cianpadraiglyons2884]

"Accidentally exposing the locals to smallpox" 👀

[@adel-711]

This is an excellent documentary of the age of discovery of the new world and how the Americas looked like before the age of discovery.

[@ArifAkhundzada]

Ha ha ha the "White Man's Burden" outlook is still alive and well, notwithstanding the host of "modern" pretenses to the contrary. Not that it is inaccurate. But it still doesn't confer the right to walk into a certain place and take it over selfishly. Such philosophies of reformism require a great deal of responsibility and are not compatible with the ordinary European individualist attitudes, especially Anglo-Saxon ones.

[@mohammedsaysrashid3587]

Excellent historical coverage video about first European pioneers invaded American contents after 1493 through several migration human waves..they much brutality annihilated majority of American Ancient peoples ....thanks Get.factual channel for sharing..

[@hogwashmcturnip8930]

And of course Muslims Never invaded or hurt anyone! They showed up with lollipops and candyfloss.

[@mohammedsaysrashid3587]

@@hogwashmcturnip8930 Muslims ☪️ did in MiddleEast & North Africa what European pioneers did in two American contents....sorry for your misunderstood

[@Seven-ld9zv]

@@hogwashmcturnip8930 How old are you ? This is a documentary to inform and educate. It's not a "mommy, he hurt me, - well he hurt me first" children's play. Go back to the Stone age if you're an adult who's stuck in the Freudian times with your Islamophobic convictions.

[@hogwashmcturnip8930]

​@@mohammedsaysrashid3587 none of us have much to be proud of. But, yes,I think I did misunderstand, sorry

[@hogwashmcturnip8930]

@@Seven-ld9zv Is that your age? It seems like it, judging by this temper tantrum. I rather think you are projecting. Freudian Times? Really? English is not your strong point is it? By the way how you decided I am Islamophobic, by pointing out that No one is innocent is puzzling. says an awful lot about You than it does me.

[@jackparry6983]

thanks again

[@glps6167]

Title misleading. "before Columbus" should end in 1491.

[@swissplumbers8243]

Don't worry about it my friend

[@zeniktorres4320]

Watch part 1.

[@bodinmagosson1480]

Isn't this "after Columbus" rather than "before Columbus"? 🤔

[@zeniktorres4320]

Watch part 1.

[@svenandersen1459]

we just wrecked the USA and still doing so

[@antoniopietrangelo6567]

Go to Africa!!

[@galanonim9863]

I wanted to find out about native Americans before columbus not Europeans after columbus. Title misleading

[@deborahms1045]

Its in the first part.

[@zeniktorres4320]

Then watch part 1

[@galanonim9863]

@@zeniktorres4320 The title should reflect the entire series, not part one. For example: America at the time of Columbus. I invented this title as l write this comment, not difficult at all. Why didn't the author do it?

[@zeniktorres4320]

@@galanonim9863 Because your suggested title doesn't reflect part 1.

[@galanonim9863]

@@zeniktorres4320 The world described in part 1 is done by Columbus and/or Columbus people thus automatically my title is correct or at least more logical than original.

[@mike_9956]

21:00 it was mentioned that tomatos and potatos where introduced by europeans but i heard potatoes where originated from south america then itroduced to europe mid 1500s

[@hogwashmcturnip8930]

If you hadn't noticed, this is the Muslim Fantasy version of history. I wouldn't take it too seriously.

[@seanogallchoir3237]

Or the Romans.

[@StrsAmbrg]

In 21:29 (tomato) and in 21:31 (potato) are clearly mentioned from America, added to the previous plants were mentioned: corn, chili, and pumpkin that were mentioned in 21:17. They clearly said that those plants came from America (Andes) and domesticated in Europe. What I was wrong is corn. Before, I thought that corn came from India taken to America.

[@davidkeenan5642]

@@StrsAmbrg The plants you mentioned weren't domesticated in Europe.

[@santiagoarestegui]

This series is plentiful of all prejudices on the discovery and conquest of the Americas. I don't recommend it.

[@rajeeshts985]

Never told about Mayan's history and Red Indians before columbus. Europeans destroyed Red Indians and captured the whole country

[@brenowind]

GREAT DOC.

[@JCOrtiz-jn5up]

The Aztecs were no in Central America (min. 9:50). They were in what is now central Mexico, Mexico City

[@dwaynegamble244]

Yes this documentary has a few things wrong for sure But still very informative

[@estrellaschallman9685]

Thnx for this true historical event bef Christopher Columbus discover my beloved country America,very amazed🇺🇸🇸🇳

[@gustavodiniz6156]

¡ América no es un pais ! ¡ América es un continente ! ¡ América es desde Canadá hasta Argentina !

[@dugrober]

He discovered also my beloved country, Colombia (comes from his last name, as you probably won't know!), AND the rest of the continent, which not only includes yours! Learn some geography and history!

[@dwaynegamble244]

Yes our country is The United States it's part of North America along with Canada and Mexico I can't believe how many people don't know this After Mexico its called central America Then South america

[@dugrober]

​@@dwaynegamble244 pure ignorance Dwayne. Not their fault they're stupid 🙄

[@pacoceja4659]

Aztecs are NOT from Central America! The Mayans are from Central America and the south east part of Mexico.

[@dzemailiromeo4118]

How beautiful you would be, planet Earth, if it were not for the existence of humans

[@vicsaul5459]

Loved the part about b4 1492 , 🤔

[@anamonteiro4108]

Vasco da gama was 1st get to India not Colombus

[@EdinburghFive]

Where does it say Columbus was the first to get to India?

[@jbkieth69]

Maybe I will get at least one person to figure it out.... it is really cool when you learn ho it was done...ho we all fell for it.... have your own advenure...I promise, You have to learn how to look

[@jacquesvincelette6692]

The title is misleading, the perspective is centered on Columbus and colonialism. After Columbus is the sharp point.

[@zeniktorres4320]

Watch part 1.

[@raquelcarrasco9205]

British Honduras had nearly same faith with the timber industry but some one should do a history of it in belize

[@dzemailiromeo4118]

What about the Eroquoi ?

[@andrewm8539]

Guns, germs, and steel all over again?

[@donbenoit2072]

Most of this video is only opinion. There is no evidence.

[@matthewlo55]

Mars before Martians evacuation

[@TheReka62]

My question: 1) why didn!t the settlers build their houses out of stone? 2) Did the chinese culture not adventured for a new world to discover?

[@Krankenwagen571]

The news of colonization must have travelled fast yet I wonder why no expeditions to new world occurred from opposite side of it from China and Japan

[@malencicnenad1131]

Unfortunately they dont speak what English have made to Indian who was there . Can you make one episode about this to explain for young generation who doesn't know history well ?

[@anamonteiro4108]

And they always tell this tales like the Europeans where the only civilizations. Like they discovered... maybe they weren't discovered the europeans because weren't no interest in them whatsoever

[@RobTheFossil]

Surprised that critical race theory looks a bit silly against this documentary? All the tribes here and in sub-Saharan Africa were still in the stone age of development before colonials arrived with the Word and education. Until colonials arrived all the tribes lived apart and hated each other. Fought against, plundered and took slaves of each others women and children. Separate nations/tribes who claimed separate land zones and lived apart. Colonials brought them together in the end as one nation. Stone age met advanced science and technology and was given education available for thousands of years in Europe. Shall I continue? Perhaps colonials took over existing schools? lol.

[@muslimaminu1]

Stop drinking.

[@EdinburghFive]

Let there were vast empires, thus your idea "Separate nations/tribes who claimed separate land zones and lived apart." is bunkum.

[@jbkieth69]

Do your own research...I am now of the opinion that this is completely false histor

[@jbkieth69]

painfully false history..I promise, it is so calm when you learn systems, and just ho things work

[@OrionBlaze]

This documentary seems to have a clear bias towards British colonization, portraying the Spanish unfavorably while glorifying the British. It fails to address the complexities of pre-colonial America, omitting crucial historical periods like the archaic period, pre-classic period. Additionally, it overlooks the migration of Paleo natives from Alaska and misrepresents the role of corn in indigenous civilizations. The documentary's portrayal of white settlers as saviors disregards the sustainable practices of indigenous communities, promoting a Eurocentric perspective of progress.

[@sirajmian6855]

اردو میں دیں

[@claramente8087]

This is the black spanish legend, pure fake.

[@Nadjibollah-ln9jx]

In Bagdad there war no tajik they war arab

[@ragnariskat6214]

The expression "settler" in this otherwise excellent documentation should be exchanged for "locust".

[@kaydibb5743]

Typical. Never really about locals

[@fryertuck6496]

How did nomadic plains indians farm corn? Complete and utter nonsense, plains indians hunted buffalo and ate a 99.8% meat only diet. Plus the corn depicted in the documentary was nothing like the wild unhybridised corn that would have grown in the Americas.

[@jbkieth69]

I can not watch this butherring of tuth

[@raphaelandrews3617]

the Spanish and British gave settlers extra land for the more slaves they had with them, they enslaved the natives as well as Africans.

[@towgod7985]

Not British, Spanish and Dutch.

[@gustavodiniz6156]

¡ Falso ! los españoles no esclavizaron. "Las misiones jesuitas protegieron al nativo americano". Sus obras están ahí, fundaron pueblos: California, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego y tantos otros. Los que mataron al nativo americanos fueron los británicos. Ésto lo cuenta "Gerónimo" el jefe indio.

[@daviddelafuentevaldes5093]

Yes, everybody knows Jamaicans come from Scotland

[@pietersiahaija4698]

" ... we have to realise that, if the "European story" was about non Europeans, they would do the same, I therefore choose not to speak of skin colour or culture, but instead of society development, that have led to a more individualist society .... "

[@ronnronn55]

Yes. Any group will take advantage of a less powerful population.

[@MrMirville]

Columbus was NOT the initiator of the conquest of the American continent by Spain, Portugal and other European empires to come then. Columbus' prowess, on his final return to Spain, was no news : the islands he tried to conquer as a businessman, as well as the nearby continent he didn't care for as it was not useful for his own gains, were already chartered on many maps even by the Ottoman Empire, like the Piri Reis. Navigation from Spain itself had been regularly occurring from Venice, Genoa, and even Northern Basque Spain, had been occurring for centuries : the only difference was that their routes were corporate secrets. Columbus was a bad navigator interested by business only who had abord other businessmen who knew better and would guide him without informing him too much as the law of trade secret was still stringently applied. Actually Columbus played no significant role, he was crowned as such only in retrospective history from the 17th onwards by later sea empires.

[@brenowind]

LOL🤣🤣🤣

[@sciuresci1403]

What a load of horseshit