An Interesting Infinite Radical

  Рет қаралды 4,168

SyberMath

SyberMath

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 21
@pje188yt
@pje188yt 27 күн бұрын
Its interesting that when a = 2, the solution is phi - 1, and if you start the alternating signs with +, the solution is phi.
@jorgechavesfilho
@jorgechavesfilho Ай бұрын
The solution is the second one (and with minus), because it's the only one compatible with a=0.
@MarieAnne.
@MarieAnne. Ай бұрын
The solution x = (1−√(4a+1))/2 only works with a = 0. For all other values a > 0, this gives x < 0, which is clearly not true from original equation. For a ≥ 1, the solution x = (√(4a−3)−1)/2 seems to be the only one that works. Example: a = 7 √(7−√(7+√(7−√(7+√(7−√(7+√(7−√(7+√(7−√(7)))))))))) ≈ 2.0000002609 (√(4a−3)−1)/2 = (√(4*7−3)−1)/2 = (√(25)−1)/2 = (5−1)/2 = 2
@onegreengoat9779
@onegreengoat9779 Ай бұрын
Using your notation, we are assuming that the sequential terms converge if an x exists. We know to satisfy the domain and the range of the square root function both a>=0 and x>=0 are real numbers. If a=0, then x=0 is the only possible solution, which is the (1-sqrt(1+4a))/2 solution. If 0
@alipourzand6499
@alipourzand6499 Ай бұрын
Great video! There is a connection between repeating nested radicals and repeating continued fractions. The equivalent alternating continued fraction will lead to the same result. Now the million dollar question is how square root and multiplicative inverse are related? ☺
@SyberMath
@SyberMath Ай бұрын
It's a great observation! 😄
@scottleung9587
@scottleung9587 Ай бұрын
Very nice!
@Kaurenjalalifarahani
@Kaurenjalalifarahani 22 күн бұрын
let gamma = that expression , then gamma squared = a - gamma
@aesthetics_ai
@aesthetics_ai 13 күн бұрын
as a physics student i have watched a lot of this kind of video , speically with towet power and immediatly i knew it was from the start the idea of sqrt ( a+ sqrt (a-x) = x
@chaosredefined3834
@chaosredefined3834 Ай бұрын
Problem: x = sqrt(a - sqrt(a + sqrt(a - sqrt(a + ........ Now, as syber points out, we can just sub in x, giving us x = sqrt(a - sqrt(a + x)). But, we can take it a step further, by introducing y = sqrt(a + x). This means that x = sqrt(a - y). So, y^2 = a + x, and x^2 = a - y. Subtracting these, we get y^2 - x^2 = (a + x) - (a - y), or y^2 - x^2 = x + y. By difference of two squares, we get (x + y)(y - x) = (x + y). Case 1: x + y = 0. If this is the case, that equation holds, so we have y = -x, so x = sqrt(a + x), or x^2 = x + a. This means that x^2 - x = a, so 4x^2 - 4x = 4a, and 4x^2 - 4x + 1 = 4a + 1. Therefore (2x - 1)^2 = sqrt(4a + 1)^2, so 2x - 1 = +/- sqrt(4a + 1), and thus x = (1 +/- sqrt(4a + 1))/2. Case 2: x + y =/= 0. If this is the case, we can divide by x + y, giving us y - x = 1. So, y = 1 + x, and so x = sqrt(a - 1 - x). This gives us x^2 = a - 1 - x => x^2 + x = a - 1 => 4x^2 + 4x = 4a - 4 => 4x^2 + 4x + 1 => 4a - 3 => 2x + 1 = +/- sqrt(4a - 3) => x = (-1 +/- sqrt(4a - 3))/2. So, answers are from the set: (1 +/- sqrt(4a + 1))/2 and (-1 +/- sqrt(4a - 3))/2
@aarona3144
@aarona3144 Ай бұрын
Wolfram Alpha doesn't use AI to solve these problems. Before AI was even a thing WA was able to solve all of these problems using mathematical algorithms. Most likely it doesn't understand your query because of the ellipsis in your query. What might be nice though is if it had the ability to interpret that in the way that a user would intend it to. Maybe that's an update that they should add to their query parser algorithm?
@vladimirkaplun5774
@vladimirkaplun5774 Ай бұрын
The most important part is missing. The technique is educative.
@yurenchu
@yurenchu Ай бұрын
_Answer_ : √(a - √(a + √(a - √(a + √(...))))) = = 0 for a=0 = -½ + √(a - ¾) for a≥1 _Calculation_ : Let x = √(a - √(a + √(a - √(a + √(...))))) y = √(a + √(a - √(a + √(a - √(...))))) . x = √(a - y) y = √(a + x) x² = (a - y) y² = (a + x) Subtract the last two equations from each other: x² - y² = (a - y) - (a + x) x² - y² = -y - x x² + x = y² - y x² + x + 1/4 = y² - y + 1/4 (x + 1/2)² = (y - 1/2)² (x + 1/2) = (y - 1/2) OR (x + 1/2) = -(y - 1/2) x = y - 1 OR (x + 1/2) = -y + 1/2 x = (y - 1) OR x = -y Combine either solution with y² = (a + x) : Case #1: x = (y - 1) y² = a + (y-1) y² - y = a - 1 y² - y + 1/4 = a - 3/4 (y - 1/2)² = (4a - 3)/4 y - 1/2 = ± (1/2)√(4a - 3) y = 1/2 ± (1/2)√(4a - 3) ... x = (y-1) ... y = [1 + √(4a - 3)]/2 & x = [-1 + √(4a - 3)]/2 [case #1.1] OR y = [1 - √(4a - 3)]/2 & x = [-1 - √(4a - 3)]/2 [case #1.2] Check that both x≥0 and y≥0 : Case #1.1 : x = [-1 + √(4a - 3)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> √(4a - 3) ≥ 1 ==> (4a - 3) ≥ 1 ==> 4a ≥ 4 ==> a ≥ 1 y = [1 + √(4a - 3)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> √(4a - 3) ≥ -1 ==> (4a - 3) ≥ 0 ==> 4a ≥ 3 ==> a ≥ 3/4 ==> Solution for a ≥ 1 , x = [-1 + √(4a - 3)]/2 Case #1.2 : y = [1 - √(4a - 3)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> -√(4a - 3) ≥ -1 ==> √(4a - 3) ≤ 1 ==> (4a - 3) ≤ 1 ==> 4a ≤ 4 ==> a ≤ 1 x = [-1 - √(4a - 3)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> -√(4a - 3) ≥ 1 ==> not possible, as LHS is non-positive and RHS is positive. ==> No values of a with solutions. Case #2: x = -y y² = a + (-y) y² + y = a y² + y + 1/4 = a + 1/4 (y + 1/2)² = (4a + 1)/4 y + 1/2 = ±(1/2)√(4a + 1) y = -1/2 ± (1/2)√(4a + 1) ... x = -y ... y = [ -1 + √(4a + 1)]/2 & x = [1 - √(4a + 1)]/2 [case #2.1] OR y = [ -1 - √(4a + 1)]/2 & x = [1 + √(4a + 1)]/2 [case #2.2] Check that both x≥0 and y≥0 : Case #2.1 : y = [-1 + √(4a+1)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> √(4a+1) ≥ 1 ==> (4a+1) ≥ 1 ==> 4a ≥ 0 ==> a ≥ 0 x = [1 - √(4a+1)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> -√(4a+1) ≥ -1 ==> √(4a+1) ≤ 1 ==> 4a+1 ≤ 1 ==> 4a ≤ 0 ==> a ≤ 0 ==> Only solution for a = 0 : x = 0 and y = 0 . Case #2.2 : x = [1 + √(4a+1)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> √(4a+1) ≥ -1 ==> 4a+1 ≥ 0 ==> 4a ≥ -1 ==> 4a ≥ -1/4 y = [-1 - √(4a+1)]/2 ≥ 0 ==> -√(4a+1) ≥ 1 ==> not possible, as LHS is non-positive and RHS is positive. ==> No values of a with solutions. Conclusion: for a = 0 , x = 0 for a ≥ 1 , x = (-1+√(4a - 3))/2 = -½ + √(a - ¾) Check into original expression: a = 0 : √(a - √(a + √(a - √(a + √(...))))) = √(0 - √(0 + √(0 - √(0 + √(...))))) = 0 ==> works out! a ≥ 1 : √(a - √(a + √(a - √(a + √(...))))) = √(a - √(a - ½ + √(a - ¾) )) = = √(a - √(a - ¾ + ¼ + √(a - ¾) )) = √(a - √( (a - ¾) + ¼ + 2*(½)*√(a - ¾) )) = √(a - √( (√(a-¾) + ½)² )) = √(a - (√(a-¾) + ½) ) = √(a - √(a-¾) - ½ ) = √(a-¾ - √(a-¾) - ½ + ¾) = √( (a-¾) - 2*½*√(a-¾) + ¼) = √( (√(a-¾) - ½)² ) = (√(a-¾) - ½) = √(a - ¾) - ½ = -½ + √(a - ¾) ==> works out!
@s1ng23m4n
@s1ng23m4n Ай бұрын
root(a - root(a + root(...))) = x root(a + root(a - root(...))) = y x^2 = a - y y^2 = a + x y^2 - x^2 = x + y (y - x)(y + x) = x + y (y + x)(y - x - 1) = 0 y = -x only if x = y = a = 0 y - x - 1 = 0 y = x + 1 x^2 = a - y = a - x - 1 x^2 + x + 1 - a = 0 x = (root(4a - 3) - 1) / 2
@icfj77
@icfj77 Ай бұрын
I have observed the four solutions without calculating it again, and only the one you say works. We need to take into account that a is greater than one, and x must be greater than 0.
@stephenshefsky5201
@stephenshefsky5201 Ай бұрын
Assuming x is real, the original equation x = sqrt(a - sqrt(a + ...)) implies x >= 0, which implies from the solution x = (sqrt(4a - 3) - 1)/2 that a >= 1.
@s1ng23m4n
@s1ng23m4n Ай бұрын
Of course x is non negative. a >= 1 and a = 0 (x = 0 then).
@RashmiRay-c1y
@RashmiRay-c1y 29 күн бұрын
Let the given expression be E. The, we see that E^2=a-√(a+E) which gives a^2-a(2E^2+1) +(E^4-E)=0 whence, a=E^2+E+1, a=E^2-E. The first does not yield a real E for a=0. Recalling that E is positive, we get, from E^2_E-a=0, E=1/2[√(4a+1) +1]
@guyhoghton399
@guyhoghton399 Ай бұрын
Nice bit of thinking outside the box. I think this is a bit simpler though: *_x = √( a - √( a + {√( a - √(a + ...) )} ) )_* ∴ *_x = √( a - √(a + x) )_* ... ① Let *_y = √(a + x)_* ∴ _y² = a + x_ ... ② _x = √(a - y)_ from ① ⇒ _x² = a - y_ Subtracting this from ②: _y² - x² = y + x_ ⇒ _(y + x)(y - x) = y + x_ ⇒ *_(y + x)(y - x - 1) = 0_* Case (i) *_y + x = 0_* ⇒ _x = -√(a + x)_ ... ③ ⇒ _x² = a + x_ ⇒ *_x² - x - a = 0_* However ... if _a_ is real then from its definition _x = √(a - √(a + ...))_ must be real and non-negative, which is contradicted by ③ unless _x = a = 0._ So *_x = 0_* is the only valid solution in this case, with _a = 0._ Case (ii) *_y - x - 1 = 0_* ⇒ _√(a + x) = x + 1_ ⇒ _a + x = x² + 2x + 1_ ⇒ *_x² + x - (a - 1) = 0_* ⇒ *_x = ½( -1 + √(4a - 3) )_* ( _x ≥ 0_ ) This solution is OK as long as _a ≥ 1_ E.g. _a = 7 ⇒ x = 2_
@MarieAnne.
@MarieAnne. Ай бұрын
x = √(a − √(a + √(a − √(a + ...)))) → a ≥ 0 Note 1: √(a − √(a + √(a − √(a + ...)))) ≥ 0 → x ≥ 0 Note 2: − √(a + √(a − √(a + ...))) ≤ 0 → √(a − √(a + √(a − √(a + ...)))) ≤ √a → x ≤ √a x = √(a − √(a + x)) x² = a − √(a + x) x² − a = −√(a + x) x^4 − 2ax² + a² = a + x a² − (2x²+1)a + (x^4−x) = 0 This is a quartic equation in x, but a quadratic equation in a. So we solve for a: a = [(2x²+1) ± √((2x²+1)² − 4(x^4−x))] / 2 a = [(2x²+1) ± √(4x^4 + 4x² + 1 − 4x^4 + 4x)] / 2 a = [(2x²+1) ± √(4x² + 4x + 1)] / 2 a = [(2x²+1) ± (2x+1)] / 2 a = x² + x + 1, a = x² − x We now have two quadratic equations in x: x² + x + 1 − a = 0, x² − x − a = 0 x = (−1±√(4a−3))/2, x = (1±√(4a+1))/2 When a = 0, then x = 0. The only solution where this works is x = (1−√(4a+1))/2 However, for all other values of a, this gives x < 0. The solution x = (−1−√(4a−3))/2 also gives x < 0. Since x ≥ 0, we can eliminate these two solutions for a > 0. From original equation we got x ≤ √a But the solution x = (1+√(4a+1))/2 = 1/2 + √(a+1/4) > √a So we can eliminate this solution, leaving us with *x = (√(4a−3)−1)/2 ≥ 0 → a ≥ 1* Solutions: For a = 0 → *√(a − √(a + √(a − √(a + ...)))) = 0* For a ≥ 1 → *√(a − √(a + √(a − √(a + ...)))) = (√(4a−3)−1)/2* --------------------------------------- Check using a = 7 √(7) ≈ 2.64575131106 √(7-√(7)) ≈ 2.08668365809 √(7−√(7+√(7))) ≈ 1.97338263207 √(7−√(7+√(7−√(7)))) ≈ 1.99639358455 √(7−√(7+√(7−√(7+√(7−√(7+√(7−√(7+√(7−√(7)))))))))) ≈ 2.0000002609 Value seems to be converging to 2 (√(4a−3)−1)/2 = (√(4*7−3)−1)/2 = (√(25)−1)/2 = (5−1)/2 = 2
Simplifying An Interesting Radical
9:51
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 4,6 М.
An Interesting Nonstandard Equation With Logs
11:39
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 7 М.
How to treat Acne💉
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 108 МЛН
“Don’t stop the chances.”
00:44
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
Мясо вегана? 🧐 @Whatthefshow
01:01
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
A Homemade Radical Equation
10:17
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 2,7 М.
Summing An Interesting Infinite Series
12:04
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 18 М.
An Exponentially Trigonometric Equation
10:50
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 3,3 М.
Can you solve this viral problem?
13:19
MindYourDecisions
Рет қаралды 177 М.
You probably haven't solved a quartic equation like this before!
12:59
A Number to the Power of a Matrix - Numberphile
16:45
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 200 М.
Summing A Cool Infinite Series
10:41
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Can We Solve A Transcendental Equation 😁
10:11
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 6 М.
quite a nice couple of problems
12:25
Michael Penn
Рет қаралды 10 М.
What is the value of this sum?
9:16
MindYourDecisions
Рет қаралды 54 М.
How to treat Acne💉
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 108 МЛН