ANACS Submission Unboxing - A Few Varieties & Errors - Grade Reveals

[@TLVESPA]

Love the video! These are some awesome coins. I've not ever seen an ANACS slab, so this video was very interesting to watch

[@noobismatic]

@TLVESPA Thanks for taking the time to check them out! ANACS is a great service for varieties. Very knowledgeable and much better prices.

[@tylonnplatinumthe3rd659]

Great video. You have a great eye for varieties. I see people all the time who have a low percentage come back with any sort of variety

[@noobismatic]

@tylonnplatinumthe3rd659 Thanks, appreciate the kind words and you checking things out! Practice, self-education, and having good mentors makes a world of difference.

[@CoinAnxiety]

I bought a 1964 Proof Nickel off eBay that was supposed to be the FS-801, but I can't find any doubling on it. Guess I can't complain too much since I only paid $2.35 for it. Nice showing. I really want to send more coins in for grading, I just don't have any that are worth the cost...yet.

[@noobismatic]

@CoinAnxiety The doubling is easiest to see on "STATES". It is a pretty tight spread, but definitely noticeable under magnification. Grading can definitely be expensive. Stay patient and you'll get there!

[@johnnyb3126]

Awesome results on the Coins 🎉🎉😊

[@noobismatic]

@@johnnyb3126 Thanks, I was pretty happy overall with the results.

[@johnbrian3122]

Nice video.

[@noobismatic]

@johnbrian3122 Thanks! Appreciate you checking it out.

[@fgstacker]

Great video. I've not seen too many people grading with ANACS. I would love to chat with you and pick your knowledge about a coin I have, and see what you think of sending it for grading. I've never submitted before, so am a bit hesitant.

[@noobismatic]

@fgstacker It's my first time using them myself. They're pretty good for more lower value stuff. I just wish they would listen to the masses and address their holders. What do you have that you're looking for info on?

[@VincentCaporina]

Not bad

[@noobismatic]

@VincentCaporina Thank you, sir! Appreciate you checking it out.

[@cweedcoins1640]

nice batch of coins

[@noobismatic]

@@cweedcoins1640 Thanks!

[@epicstudios7270]

What microscope do you use

[@noobismatic]

@@epicstudios7270 I use a TOMLOV Model DM201. It's pretty decent, but I think I'd rather have one with auto-focus.

[@epicstudios7270]

@@noobismatic thank you, how much $

[@noobismatic]

@@epicstudios7270 it was roughly $125, a couple years ago. I'm sure there's been better/cheaper options since then.

[@epicstudios7270]

@@noobismatic thanks man

[@GVolker1108]

Whats the turnaround time?

[@noobismatic]

@@GVolker1108 I'm sure it varies a bit, but my wait was roughly two months.

[@EricBynog-zd4rd]

Yea anacs is ok with the variety’s and they are cheaper but they also don’t bring the money either and I can’t stand there holder I am hear to say it if ANACS would use either a style like the old rattler or the old Blanchard holder I would change from NGC to them also if the change up label just a little there business would double or triple never ever in my like of 48 years have I heard of a company that refuses to listen to there customers or the market and be so stubborn but it’s there hard head

[@noobismatic]

@@EricBynog-zd4rd I am on board with just about everything you said here, haha. The holders are just awful! A return to a quality version of the soapbox would would be an immediate success for them, I believe. Can't understand why they're so stuck on this.

[@EricBynog-zd4rd]

@@noobismatic me either they could keep this holder to just give the customers what they want