Analyzing an argument for validity

Learning Objectives:
1) Analyze an argument to determine it's logical structure
2) Decide if the logical form of an argument is valid or invalid
The main argument forms are Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Generalization, Specialization, and Contradiction. To see more on each of these, check out the following playlist:
►Full DISCRETE MATH Course Playlist: • Discrete Math (Full Co...
Other Course Playlists:
►CALCULUS I: • Calculus I (Limits, De...
►CALCULUS II: • Calculus II (Integrati...
►CALCULUS III: • Calculus III: Multivar...
►LINEAR ALGEBRA: • Linear Algebra (Full C...
► Want to learn math effectively? Check out my "Learning Math" Series: • 5 Tips To Make Math Pr...
►Want some cool math? Check out my "Cool Math" Series: • Cool Math Series
*****************************************************
YOUR TURN! Learning math requires more than just watching math videos, so make sure you reflect, ask questions, and do lots of practice problems!
****************************************************
►Follow me on Twitter: / treforbazett
BECOME A MEMBER:
►Join: / @drtrefor
MATH BOOKS & MERCH I LOVE:
► My Amazon Affiliate Shop: www.amazon.com...

[@itsmebenkenobi741]

my teacher told us to self study this lesson and i've been watching your videos and helped me alot than reading my modules that seems complicated but you made it clearer to me! thank you so much sir! much love!

[@mrdevil2228]

thank you sir for such a nice teaching

[@ann03_200]

Sir.. can u pls do videos on lattices in discrete mathematics...I'm confused of those problems..

[@Wildwildmint]

Nice explaination.

[@hellosweetcupcake]

Thank you so much for this explanation!

[@karthikmohan1539]

I think it is a valid argument because it is satisfying rule of Modus Ponens

[@christianjosephdulla2474]

Fallacy of the converse. Therefore invalid

[@QuotesWorld987]

No it is not a valid argument. It will be a valid argument, if it had “if and only if” condition instead of “if then” conditional structure of the first premise.

[@karthikmohan1539]

Yes, looking at it with a fresh set of eyes and argument is indeed invalid.

[@VALR1able]

Thanks for this explanation. Would this be fallacy by affirming the conclusion?

[@anelisiwemtati1072]

good explanation but it's too short

[@ssekanjakofrank3233]

thank you very much

[@YenPham-di5ft]

Character In the video It's great, I like it a lot $$

[@common1237]

i can some how recognize your voice. did you give voice for any manga dub?

[@usamaalibhatti5463]

Great

[@nekomaru3679]

Oh, this is the same as the last part of the previous part of the playlist. I think you didn't give an example of the contradiction like the other terms; generalization and specialization.

[@sharan9993]

Grt example is √2 is irrational

[@timverrecchia1654]

hats of to writing letters backwards so we can read it

[@padraiggluck2980]

😎 Robert Ludlum said he was a great writer because he made a lot of money from his writing

[@avrilmaldonado7849]

no entiendo

[@WolFX_FPS]

Hey Dr Trefor, you explained converse error in this video, what if p then q, ~p therefore ~q, would this be known as a negation error? Cheers.

[@MrConverse]

That’s inverse error.

[@Malcollab]

870000

[@user-yz5oh4jj7v]

confusing af

[@victoriajurado6890]

Bunyi video tidak bagus

[@mrdevil2228]

thank you sir for such a nice teaching