Angry Photographer: Supreme Nikkor PRIME LENSES ROUNDUP! Fisheye to Telephoto

[@mhess427]

Summary (to save myself time when I undoubtedly return to this): 135mm 2.8 - Excellent but expensive 135mm 3.5 - Same 10.5 Fisheye - DX 105mm 2.5 - Sharp 100mm 2.8 E Series - Sharp and compact 20mm 2.8 AF 20mm 3.5 - "Favorite little lens" 50mm 1.8 Pancake 50mm 1.4 - More distortion than the 1.8 50mm 2.0 - Built like a tank 24mm 2.8D AF - "Wonderful, sharp little prime" although not recommended in an earlier video because the 20mm is better. 35mm - Meh, some street shooters like it. 60mm 2.8D Macro - Highly regarded for FX or DX. Swiss army knife of primes. 85mm 1.8D 85mm 1.8G - Superior optics in this focal range 85mm f2 - Very nice, sharp, cheap, silky smooth. Tokina 100mm - excellent, silk, sex, and sugar. Freaking awesome. 180mm 2.8

[@afiskandar]

Thank you sir

[@abhiph2982]

There are two 105 f 2.5. AI version and non AI Which was was the one you recommended in the video Please clarify

[@jaylenkylen9705]

i dont mean to be offtopic but does any of you know of a way to log back into an instagram account? I was dumb lost my login password. I would love any tricks you can offer me!

[@marcusfelix8774]

@Jaylen Kylen instablaster ;)

[@jaylenkylen9705]

@Marcus Felix Thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site through google and I'm trying it out now. Looks like it's gonna take quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.

[@bjjtechnerd]

u ROCK BROTHER! thx for the shout out! i respect the hell out of you !! thanks for all your help!

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

marco pagliaro Haaaaaaa!!! Absofuckinglutely ! winks

[@jamesr6497]

35mm isn't really exciting to me either for street photography, low end for me is 24mm but usually 50, 55 60mm. The high end 85mm to 120 tops. 35mm just isn't wide enough for groups and blows head shots out of proportion. I like 24mm better for landscape. I can't believe that heavy monster Sigma designed for 35mm weighs as much as a Nikon 24-70mm 2.8...ridiculous!!

[@abhiph2982]

Hi Ken There are two 105 f 2.5. AI version and non AI Which was was the one you recommended in the video Please clarify

[@joellemorris5684]

Based on few videos i watched, i understood that if we have a Nikon AI or AIS lens mounted via a speedbooster (like Viltrox NF-M43X) to the Panasonic GH5, we will be able to read the aperture change in the viewfinder. Can you confirm this? Thanks for your help!!!

[@joebroyles5680]

I bought a 50mm AI f/2 on Ebay and can't seem to get it to work with my D300 or D500. I don't know why but the aperture won't work on the camera at all. I'm not sure if you've had any of the same issues. Lens aperture set to f/16

[@GregThurtle]

Great roundup.. your videos seem to have made all prices shoot up.. even the 50mm f/2 is £100 here in UK

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Greg Thurtle its still cheap here in usa Ebay well, i have no control over supply

[@GregThurtle]

Theoria Apophasis can you please make some videos saying how junk all nikon lenses are to affect demand :D

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

that was unclear, clarify what you said

[@GregThurtle]

Well if you say the lenses are crap people will sell them cheaper :)

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

heheheh, well, i cannot be a liar on my channel, i have to both be myself and be straight up to folks about things

[@WaniMedia]

when can you make ancient Nikkor q lenses? ive got 2 of them hacked and converted, great on D3, made my d3100 saturate colors almost like a d3 too. lots of them cheap, just dunno which are the good ones

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

most of them arent that great, and cost too much in total after conversion

[@CARLOSGUTIERREZ65]

In the video you mentioned that you don't use 35mm, but which one would you recommend (ai or ais) the f2 or the f1.4? Thank you for all of your great work.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

whut??? got tons of 35mm, likely my fave focal

[@Ferbocarbo]

Theoria Apophasis whuuuuut?? I'm confused :') 0:40 you say you don't like 35mm

[@86oldcold]

Just purchased the 105mm 2.5. This is super sharp lens. Thanks for the recommendation!

[@appleblows1]

Hey Ken, is 60mm 2.8d a good lens to be adapted to Fuji x?

[@v1htori]

Ken, whats your opinion on the 24mm f2.0 ai-s nikkor?

[@dmt99vn]

bad value len, very expensive

[@guiore7174]

Hello Ken, I've seen a 18mm Nikkor F/3.5 Ai-s lens. I'm planing to buy it, mostly for interior photography, but haven't found an angry review. What's your opinion on it?

[@ostobisto6261]

Hi Ken, you mentioned to get '60mm 2.8 D' series, but the one you showed in this video is not D series. how does a D series differ from non D? the reason I am asking, there is a ~$50 difference between them.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Osto Bisto theyre both the same, the D version just sends some BS data to the camera for flash compensation. the pre-D is the same lens minus the BS flash data

[@SilfortyElement]

Please excuse myself since I'm new to photography and I've enjoyed watching your videos. Could you give insights as to why you prefer the 135mm 2.8 over the 85mm ais? You even said the newer 85mm is optically superior but why is the Ais your favorite?

[@Whatisright]

(3 months later lol) My guess. No plastic or electronics. It's just glass and metal which means there's less to maintain, less to malfunction. Built to last. And the build to last part is key because these lenses are very old. Build aside 135mm is a great focal length. Throw everything out of focus even stopped down sure it's tight, but it's beautiful.

[@brooksysdead]

Hi ken i have a question regarding macro. I have a dinkie lol d3400. I do eventually plan on upgrading to a better body eventually but not any time soon as i feel the 3400 fills all of my current needs. My question is what macro lens in the 400 dollar price range should i get? I do some general landscapes and portraits with the 18-55 and 70_300 kit lenses but im very passionate about macro photography. I did insect shots with my cellphone and a clip on lens with all things considered good results for years but i want to upgrade so i can do macro with my actual dslr. Would the tokina f2.8 work out on my body? I shoot in all manual mode and also have no problems with manual focus if that lens won't af on my body. Thank you for all the great content, you are always my go to for camera info.

[@brooksysdead]

I was also thinking about picking up a set of extension tubes as well but along with those i would really like a dedicated macro lense that i can grow with. Thanks again

[@BklynBorn81]

Any info on the Nikkor 14mm F2.8 prime?

[@rubbersouul]

Hola Ken. What do you think about the 28mm 2.8 AIS? Thank you!

[@Sailorboy192]

Got the 60mm micro on your suggestion and love it on my D7200. Sharp as a tack. Keep up the good work.

[@liammuc]

Are there any Nikkor manual focus zoom lenses worth buying? What do you think of the 75-150 3.5 Ai-S for example?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

liammuc that ones no good, but yes, there are SOME.

[@liammuc]

Thanks! Any cheap "must haves" recommendations?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

50mm f1.4 105mm 2.5 tokina 100mm 2.8

[@liammuc]

Thanks, but I was actually refering to my zoom lenses question (manual fokus) :-)

[@davidlbc8307]

What do you think about the 18mm f4?

[@kristofbarta2964]

Since getting the 60mm f/2.8, the Tokina 100mm for home and the 20mm f/3.5, the 55mm f/2.8, and the 105mm f/2.5 for travel. I don't use anything else 99% of the times.

[@1sicke46]

What are your thoughts on Nikon 35 F2D ?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

+Anthony Vargas ive made vids on taht lens, its absolutely awesome

[@JasonEnMovimiento]

Love your videos! a friend of my dad has the NIKKOR-S Auto 55mm f/1.2. What do you think of that lens? Is is worth buying?

[@lucasdemelloqueiroz950]

what are your thoughts on the rokinon 8mm??

[@LongCity]

Hey, just wondering what your thoughts on the 135mm F2.8 Nikkor-Q (AI converted) and the Micro 100mm F2.8D. Also thoughts on owning both at the same time - pointless or no? Thanks

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

LongCity not pointless no, what PRICE on that old converted Q? over 100$, then not worth it at all

[@LongCity]

Theoria Apophasis $70 CAD, so roughly $50 USD. The 105mm F2.8D is listed for $200 CAD (~$150 USD). Is that too much and if so, what would be a better price to aim for for this guy. Thanks for the response. Also, your videos keep making me hunt for these legacy lenses haha. Shooting manual is fun, it's like a game trying to get the green dot to appear.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

$50? sure thing then. the 105mm price (in USB) is typical for what they sell for

[@meowmixmeowmix]

Can the 60mm af d be used for portraits?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

yes indeed it can

[@meowmixmeowmix]

Just wanted to say thanks for all the replies so far. A week ago I had no knowledge about what was good or bad about my gear :D I ended up buying a NEW 85mm 1.8g for $300 + a small commute to get it. I've basically rounded out my lens collection thanks to you! I have a 14-24mm < ), 50mm 1.8d, 10mmdx fisheye, the 85mm 1.8g, and the kit 24-120 that I use for easy video work :D Hoping to replace the kit lens for something a bit better, its only used to keep my 14-24mm safe since it cant have a filter on it >

[@eddyfan4471]

Nikon 24mm f/2.8 manual focus AI , is it a soft lens ?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Eddy fan only a tiny wee bit,........ its the 28mm that is soft as hell (hate it!)

[@eddyfan4471]

thanks !

[@robertburkey5789]

I want to thank you for recommending the Tokina 100mm, I would have never considered this lens otherwise and now it is my favorite lens. It is magical! No other lens I own gives me the color rendition or the WOW factor that this lens does. As you said... it IS the tits! Thank you so much! You are a bit unorthadox, but you know your shit man. Keep it comming!!!

[@westonharby165]

What about the 28mm f2.8 with CRC? I love that lens, it has zero barrel distortion.

[@bethpaulsen3550]

so many recommended lenses are manual focus. For sports shooting is manual focus a bad idea? would I get used to it?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

+Beth Paulsen bad idea for most sports, for certain yes. what budget did you have for a fast action and or PJ lens?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

+Beth Paulsen bad idea for most sports, for certain yes. what budget did you have for a fast action and or PJ lens?

[@bethpaulsen3550]

+Theoria Apophasis - right now I am just learning about lenses for the future. I just went pro, I just got the d810 and the nikon 50mm 1.4. I do both sports and portrait photography. I know I want the tamron 70-200mm now from watching your videos. I want fast and sharp when it comes to sports photography. For portrait I want crazy creamy bokeh yet super sharp where it matters. I love low aperture. I love SATURATED deep colors. Not airy. I still have my old d90, a sigma 50mm for the d90 with nice bokeh, and for zoom I am using the 18-200mm I had on my d90. I need next another good prime for portrait work. What would you suggest I get next based on the type of photos I want? SATURATED colors and CREAMY bokeh.

[@bethpaulsen3550]

+Theoria Apophasis I don't shoot manual focus, I have never tried much really. But I am willing to learn if it means achieving the look l want.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

+Beth Paulsen ahh, ive got a pair of D810 :) yah yah, Tammy 70 200 2.8 VC portrait, Zeiss 85mm 1.4 Planar ZF2 color saturation is more to do with photosite gain cameraside and a LOW element PRIME lens. again, zeiss 85mm 1.4 however thats a MF lens. you do BW portrait at all? if so, again the Zeiss otherwise 85mm 1.8G nikkor.

[@UncleMichaelable]

Will the 100mm and 105mm work well with D700?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

well certainly yes

[@rydaug79]

I can't get good results from the 35mm 1.8 G DX. No matter what aperture I shoot it seems soft. I have a friend that has the same problem. (We both have D90s) Any ideas why we are getting soft pictures? BTW sorry, I am commenting on all these old videos. I just found you a few days ago.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

***** defective lens, try it on another body, or can you return it?

[@rydaug79]

One more thing. I bracket a lot of my shots and the D7000 and the D600 only let you go down to 0.5 seconds between shots with the self-timer. Is there a way to get a faster frame rate without having to hold the shutter button down? Thanks for responding to all my questions btw. YOU, Sir are the cats ass.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

yes, there is the device i recently did a video on....the shutterboss pro II

[@rydaug79]

Hey, I just tested the 35mm 1.8 G. I focused on a ruler and it is focusing almost 2cm past the focus point.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

oooooh, you know how to adj. your focus point? its in your camera settings. :)

[@cheny8923]

but in another video you said the 35mm f2 AF-D was a must own lens... why didn't you include it here?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Jeff Chen Must own value wise yes. Why? Thats almost a pretty good question........it doesnt qualify as a high use prime for "most people" i made a judgement call in this video and didnt include same........

[@cheny8923]

thanks . if i was getting a 35 prime for DX which would you recommend? 35 is like a 50 standard on DX that is why I want one. and AF is important for me. Please let me know

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

the DX 35mm 1.8 is DAMN GOOD, its the absolute TOP VALUE

[@cheny8923]

what if performance is higher priority than TOP value? would you still recommend the DX 35 1.8 for high performer on DX body or would a full frame 35 lens perform better? if so which one? AF and 35mm is important because it will be a 'standard prime' for my DX body. D7200

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

money be damned, then the 35mm 1.8 FX Ive made several videso stating WHY people should generally buy FX lenses for their DX bodies, for many logical reasons. :)

[@BarbasMinecraft]

ken, what you think about the Nikkor Series E 35mm F/2.5 Ais ?

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

It is a piece of crap. Get the f2D instead.

[@BarbasMinecraft]

+Aaron Yang why?

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

+The Barbas (Minecraft) The corner sharpness is horrible on the series e. I bought one and it is one of my worst prime lens.

[@BarbasMinecraft]

And the nikkor 100 and 135 E are good?

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

I don't have the 135mm Series E, but the 100mm Series E is an excellent lens, even wide open, its sharpness is at the same level of a modern lens. I am still using it on the D750 for portrait work. A friend of mine use the LM-EA7 adapter and mount my lens on the a7R2, and auto focusing performance is quite decent.

[@cesarg4328]

Hey Ken, what about the Nikkor 180mm 2.8 AI-S ???

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

yes, that great old lens, its always overpriced though :/

[@christopherbartleson8918]

You mentioned the Nikkor 200mm f4 in text in the video, did you mean the ai-s version?

[@dethmerc]

You really can't go wrong with almost any macro lens.

[@euroyank860]

Like it, as always. Why not do one on Non-AI, I know lot's of old wolves would like it and some great deals to be found.. I shoot a Ftn and F3.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Tovenaar I would but only have a couple, i dont use them one bit anymore I gotta have em to make a video on them.

[@mainakbasuroy7060]

+Theoria Apophasis alryt a quickie before i ask the question....my budget is so that i had to choose a D5200 body above a D7100 body,and my clicking habit is so that i tend to forget at times that there is something called autofocus in dslrs....now the question...can you please recommend me a perfect set of lenses for my D5200 body that i can have,if i tell u that i almost shoot anything... P.S:please consider the autofocus too as much as possible.. :-P.. . . ..and yea...i follow u lik The Bible!! :-P

[@bbrunorocha]

+Mainak Basu Roy get the 35mm 1.8g af-s

[@philippe21R]

Have you made a Supreme Nikkor ZOOM LENSES ROUNDUP video?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

i havent yet, i dont think :/

[@philippe21R]

can't wait... :)

[@palacelondon538]

what about the Sigma 10mm F2.8 Fisheye?

[@alexadrianov8357]

Ken, is 24/2.8 AI any good?

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

i have 2 of em, theyre not impressive at all :/ the new 24mm 1.8G is awesome

[@AnarchicImage]

Another very useful video dude, but do me a solid: Just post these videos directly to me. Don't publish them on the interwebs. These price jumps are starting to hurt. I'll have to sell a kidney or some distant relatives at this rate! :)

[@camrolaguardia]

no love for the 200 f4? lol saw one at this 2nd hand store for $20 ima get it with the 60mm micro they have on display there too. dang. im so glad that your videos aint that famous here in my country. lol got the 135mm 2.8 btw. loving it btw!!! cheers

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Camro Neil Laguardia oh hell youre right, i left out the 200mm F4 DohhhhhhhhH!!!

[@DanTechTV]

which is sharper to you, 100mm or 105mm? I am split between them

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

which 100mm?

[@DanTechTV]

Sorry, the Nikkor 100mm 2.8

[@tomtomcuerdo]

great reviews man..

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Antomer Cuerdo thanks man!! warm hugs!!!

[@christopherbrougham]

Hi - firstly - you're mad, in a good way, we like that in NZ. But yeah, I much prefer it when you do the easy "How to use manual focus lenses on DSLR" - that was brilliant. Chill out man... Questions: 1: Have you reviewed the 70-200 VR f4 Nikkor yet? Can't find it. Question 2: Why do you say in this vid Ken Rockwell got the 85's wrong? I've always had good advice from the old bugger. Bought my 60mm 2.8 Micro on his advice. No mistake there - I'd never part with it, as you agree. But why is he wrong here? I have to mention too, and I'm not sure if this is an export thing - Nikon's 80-200, 2.8D, two ring - mine and many pros I know in NZ and Australia have had their plasticky AF rings snap. Its Achilles heel? Keep rocking you mad bastard, and all the best from New Zealand. Would love your answers.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

+Christopher Brougham 70 200 F4 is a decent lens, dated and slow but fine. HALF of Rockwells lens reviews are pure lies, he never even touched the lenses. he got the 85mm 1.4 AIS dead wrong because its junk. if you read the LIES and BS on rockwells front pages, youll get what i said.......hes been caught in a TON of lies hes FAMOUS among pro shooters for his insane lies and nonsense.

[@ChristopherFynn001]

​@@KenTheoriaApophasis Awww don't be too harsh, he's got a family of little Rockwells to feed.

[@TheLegend-os4xx]

I flipped my whole digital kit for that 60mm micro lens :) i will get the fuji xt20 probably too

[@LarryParamedic1]

I have a 300mm f/2.8 AIS, it is a sweet lens. Always a pleasure to use when mounted on my D7100.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

+LarryParamedic1 I will be reviewing a few ZEISS lenses next (yeah, the super-expensive stuff)

[@beaupfeifferrecordings]

very good info cheers

[@gregorychernalis1958]

1st! Love your videos! 2nd! I'm confused...in this video you say you never really use a 35mm prime nor like! But in your top 13 lenses video you go ape sh...... over the Carl Zeiss 35mm f2 zf2! Best lenses ever!!! Please explain!

[@jsprite123]

See comment below to LarryParamedic (I believe he meant to answer your comment).

[@TheAndemas]

You talk a lot about not needing fast glass but your background is photography. Would you still hold this point when talking about video? I mean, we can't go under 1/25 s and the ISO only goes so high without noise taking over the image. Besides the color correction that's usually done on what we shoot. I'm just asking because many vintage lens users are videomakers and I haven't seen this being questioned here.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

TheAndemas well i dont make videos on video :)

[@TheAndemas]

+Theoria Apophasis I guess I'll have to make my own channel to focus on vídeo XD But thanks for your work on lenses as a whole(fotography or vídeo), you've talked about various points I didn't thought about before. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

sorry, im just worn out man, if you only knew

[@philippe21R]

What about the 300mm f4.5? Much cheaper than the f4, there must be a reason...

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

simplex design, lack of complex elements

[@philippe21R]

image quality?

[@ന്യൂയോർക്]

Ken-look at the damage you did while my wife was away-Got the 135,60 NIKKOR from your list-Tammy 45 is on order-with 10-24 for my RE shoots-I will have to bag a Volg 58 F1.4 ,Nikkor 35 F2 D-Nikkor 105 F2 DC,180 F2.8-Thanks for that hole in my purse-😊

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

for your Xmas gift?

[@dmt99vn]

Awesome, you great !

[@skiaddict08]

Tokina 17-35 is a good zoom from them!!!

[@existentialvoid]

55mm 2.8 ais?

[@niklasjuchem]

what about the 20mm 1.8 D:

[@vanillabogdan570]

Hello mate ! I am so happy i bought the 20mm 3.5 :D about 10 hours ago with only ~200$ and is looks great ..... is like new . i will add some pictures :D

[@Admeralsarms]

omgf! this is awesome!!!

[@gewglesux]

NO 14MM Nikkor? 2.8

[@Saltycrabs]

See I like my 35mm you recommended. It's a good cheap (in price) lens that's light for hiking and because it's inexpensive I don't feel as bad if I damaged it. Plus it takes pretty good pictures. But I can't lie I'd like a 20mm.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Saltycrabs i should have mentioned i was talking about the expensive 35mm FX lens, not the 35mm DX lens which = 50mm basically. 35mm DX, yup, excellent.

[@Saltycrabs]

Theoria Apophasis Okay, yeah I haven't seen a lot of good reviews on the FX 35mm. The DX 35mm is my go to lens right now but the only two issues I have with it is the bokeh isn't all that great and chromatic aberration is pretty noticeable but I can fix that in lightroom. Still love it and every lens you've recommended that I've gotten.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

for $500, the 35mm FX lens is a pile of useless POO for almost everyone.

[@luismanuelruizmorales6829]

Hi, I can buy these 3 lenses for 150 USD. Nikkor 28 mm f 3.5 AI Nikkor 50 mm f 2.0 AI Nikkor 100-300 mm f 5.6. They are in good condition. could you help me. I have no problems with manual focus and would use them on a Nikon d600.

[@robertberg3522]

Shout back from the crazy viking here!!! :-) This is just lens porn of the highest degree!! Is it wrong to get a little wood from this??? Maybe its just me? Hahahah!

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

Robert Berg just dont get it on the screen!! mhehhehehehe

[@robertberg3522]

Dude, I have wipes! I'm not totally crazy! or.........? LOL

[@txtele]

Micro- Nikkor-P Auto 1:3.5 F=55mm Nippon Kogaku Japan. I can't live with out this girl and I name all my lenses after women this one being named Junia meaning born in June and since the serial number is my birth date which is crazy 6-18 anyway that's way too much information thanks for the video

[@paulgreen6903]

It look s to me, that most of your WIDE ANGLE lens.....have no u.v. filter....THAT S GREAT....as i hate them.........but your tele s have them. Are you thinking that the wide angle lens front element are more scratch proof, then the tele s? I use a LEICA R 3, with the 24m.m. f2.8 ELMAR......with the perfect hood, and 50 m.m. f 2.0 SUMMICRON ( made in CANADA ) and the 90m.m. f 2.8 tele ELMAR...............All with NO U.V. JUNK.......

[@sushamaagarwal3377]

what about 35 mm 1.8 Nikon

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

which one? there are 4 diff ones

[@philippe21R]

If you're talking about the DX lens, it's very nice (and cheap).

[@cesarg4328]

Nikkor 60mm vs Tokina 100mm?? I mean, sharpness, micro-contrast, etc. forget the focal lenght, just the IQ.

[@KenTheoriaApophasis]

IQ only……60mm AFD nikkor

[@cesarg4328]

Nice, thanks champ.

[@michaelkennedy8843]

LOVED my 60mm so much I sold my 100MM Tokina. I like the 85mm 1.8G lens for portraits so the Tokina became expendable IMO

[@918ChevyGuy]

@@KenTheoriaApophasis I just bought the 60mm f2.8d on eBay today. May get the Tokina 100mm at a later date...thanks for the info...

[@andrewreynolds1217]

I love the 100mm series E lens, great results and very light.

[@dmt99vn]

Andrew Reynolds did u try 105 2.5 or 135 2.8 ?

[@andrewreynolds1217]

David Duong I have not tried the 105 but I did pick up a 3rd party 135 f2.8 which is proving to be nice to shoot with.

[@Admeralsarms]

omgf! this is awesome!!!