doing a project on this book right now. Great story
@sohnizahid810 Жыл бұрын
Same lol
@bigshot75044 жыл бұрын
Reddit be like:
@albinjohansson10825 ай бұрын
This scene is so empowering to me for some reason
@jrsthesedays9254 ай бұрын
Probably because you’re 2 years old
@albinjohansson10824 ай бұрын
@@jrsthesedays925 Troll
@jarnevanseveren1198 Жыл бұрын
But some animals are more equal than others...
@GanonGhidorah2 жыл бұрын
I know what the overall purpose of the novel is... But looking at this scene, i can't help but think, "A lot of this could have been avoided had Snowball _not left_ so much empty space in between the commandments." ...Unless Snowball - as a pig - was expecting to largely do the same.
@Chineseconcrete2 жыл бұрын
Snowball would eventually try to become a dictator, probably through convincing the animals to let him have the power. One thing for sure is he would be nowhere near as cruel as napoleon
@luigimrlgaming9484 Жыл бұрын
@@Chineseconcrete thing is we don’t know what would’ve happened It could’ve been even worse but it also could’ve been much better.
@AmitCinematicUniverse5 жыл бұрын
So, what about animals that eat meat? Can they kill other animals?
@LadyEvilest4 жыл бұрын
The only farm animal that is an obligate carnivore is a cat. Probably why it didn't get into Animalism. Most of the farm animals are strict herbivores, except for pigs that can eat anything. Most pigs raised for slaughter are put on a all grain diet, but they can eat meat. (Some people hide bodies by feeding them to pigs.)
@ClarkeMarek Жыл бұрын
And the dogs. They eat meat, too. I think that gets covered under the commandment of "No animal shall kill another animal without reason." ;) (Yes, I know, it was modified to justify the slaughter of the rebelious chickens, but that would be the justification.)
@AmitCinematicUniverse Жыл бұрын
@ClarkeMarek I still wonder how those dogs grew so physically well without meat.
@ClarkeMarek Жыл бұрын
@@AmitCinematicUniverse Well, since they never enforced the policy on the wild animals(in the book, they agreed the wild animals where to be treated as equals), and since it was forgotten about, guess why you rarely saw mice after the first few chapters. Or why squirrels, racoons, and badgers(or any other fauna in the British Isles) rarely got mentioned.
can someone explain what "four legs good two legs bad" means?
@MasterOfKnowledge.5 жыл бұрын
Basically it's saying that anything that walks on two legs (aka the humans) are bad, with the only exception being animals with two legs
@johnyoung26454 жыл бұрын
CNN good. Orangemanbad.
@edsantoss4 жыл бұрын
@@johnyoung2645 orange man is bad tho.
@nathansharp57434 жыл бұрын
Its a reference to crude communist propaganda, called agitprop, that was targeted at illiterate peasants. They would often reduce things down to very simple slogans for the purpose of agitating mobs against "class enemies", or any obstacle that stood in the way of Communist Party hegemony.
@hundeyin3 жыл бұрын
@174M Look at the brains on Einstein over here.
@patriciafabian619 Жыл бұрын
What about the chickens and ducks which clearly walk on two legs are they bad people
@luigimrlgaming9484 Жыл бұрын
*WINGS COUNT AS LEGS*
@ClarkeMarek Жыл бұрын
@@luigimrlgaming9484 Because they are used for walking/flying, not for manipulation as a hand is used.