animation experiments at 48 frames per second

[@Mayyde]

A lot of people have been asking for the name of the song in this video. There isn't really a name for it, but it's just a chord progression I came up with when I was playing guitar a couple years ago. I found the old recording and decided to use it as background music rather than having the video be total silence lol but yeah the song is just a short recording of me playing some chords I thought were pretty cool

[@FOXTROTALPHA2412]

Epic

[@monsieurbacteria7336]

Epic

[@radkillz3692]

Epic

[@smolamenotanapostlebutaame8228]

Slap* epico

[@Jeff1999PB2]

Epic

[@the7guy]

48 frames per second, 48 second long video. SATISFACTION

[@parasocks1613]

HEC =K YEAH

[@me.ga.]

If only this comment got 48 replies

[@plantsero5652]

huh

[@me.ga.]

You heard me, 48 replies would be epic

[@Gooberpatrol66]

48 frames per second/48 seconds = this video contains 1 frame of animation.

[@TheCrafsMan]

Mannn, I agree with you 100%: "2D animation doesn't need high framerates, leave it to video games." Though if I've ever seen one good example of high framerate animation, *this* is it. And I'll add that this applies just as well to physical/stop-motion animation. In fact, I prefer the look of things shot on twos, or even THREES. Excellent demonstration!

[@EEEEEEEE]

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

[@BobBob-qg4lo]

Love your videos crafsman, one of the finest creators on this website in my opinion

[@Olysses02]

What does it mean if something is shot on twos or threes?

[@VYDEOS2]

Higher fps is 100% better because you're seeing more frames. It's just harder to do. It only looks bad when interpolated

[@J_I_E_V_E]

YOOOO! Its the man himself!

[@TMJBtv]

I'd be way too lazy for this but it's a very cool concept

[@zeiccia]

i dont think you can call it a concept

[@thetotallygoodgamer]

I can barely animate as it is

[@bluefireanimation9431]

fr fr i wouldn't want to animate 48 frames for 1 sec, i usually animate at 20

[@Squidmoto3]

With spine 2D you could do this in literally an hour

[@freyuh6118]

If you call yourself lazy, You will not accomplish anything

[@okaybutwhythough7456]

High frame rate animation that doesn't look like garbage. We've got a rare one on our hands, boys.

[@childeryeeter4202]

Because it’s not interpolated

[@RipleySawzen]

Actually most NATIVE high framerate animation does not look like garbage

[@jessyjuly]

That's because the artist drew every frame individually, and it wasn't some machine doing it

[@johnnycranknose4098]

@@RipleySawzen native?

[@bookfish]

High framerate animation can look good, if it was meant to be high framerate animation. 24 fps animation interpolated to 60 fps will always look like crap.

[@HonkaiHistory]

I like the way japanese animators play with the framerates they animate in. For just talking or basic movement they use very limited animation, sometimes only 2-4 frames, but when they want a cut or a scene to have real impact, be it an emotional or an action sequence, they bump the fps they animate in way higher and it makes those moments stand out much more and make them feel really impactful

[@zephyrias]

I was thinking the same thing!

[@tganims9804]

"Bump the fps"?

[@HonkaiHistory]

@@tganims9804 bumping up is another way of saying increasing. fps = frames per second. They draw for example 3-4 times more frames in the same timeframe.

[@Ivan-fy3pr]

​@floobix1blud doesn't understand people aren't born with any information

[@JesusChristTheHoly]

says the white person unironically saying "blud"@floobix1

[@OblivionFalls]

0:36 Very satisfying at 50% speed

[@AD_RC]

or, you mean... 24fps

[@jasonsanimations2624]

@@AD_RC thats not really...how it works *edit* turns out that is how it works, sorry for making you guys mad :| stop replying to me with the same stuff lol

[@AD_RC]

@@jasonsanimations2624 well, 48 on twos

[@jasonsanimations2624]

@@fennex7575 bruh

[@burritodawgg]

@@fennex7575 the framerate doesn’t reduce when it’s slowed down lol

[@teacup4561]

"2D animation doesn't need high framerates, leave it to video games." THANK YOU (from the description)

[@swilleh_]

"2D animation doesn't need attention, i'll leave it to video games"

[@dionyzus2909]

@@swilleh_ you just sounded like you're less than 12yo

[@WasatchWind]

@@swilleh_ It doesn't need attention from people that prefer 60 fps animation over 24.

[@budgetyoutubechannel6128]

@@swilleh_ please shut up

[@lljw7151]

@@WasatchWind 24 looked like shit

[@DogeTheDoge77]

As someone who does, and might I say loves animation, I have an incredible amount of respect for anyone that can manage a 47-second video at a consistent 48 fps.

[@Nyamhk_art]

I actually appreciate how people in the comments are taking into account how hard you actually had to work to make this. I only do illustration and I've always wanted to do animation but I just can't bring myself to draw something so many times before having anything that resembles a final product. Hats off to all the animators out there, for real

[@Lulu_o7]

This is why I use rigging for animation. It allows me to copy past the basic design features and life becomes easier. It does of course have its limits but it works for me. Still takes me half an hour to do one second tho and I usually use 12 FPS lol

[@BVK.]

Quite Impatient I must day

[@HarpSeal]

Animators usually don’t draw frame by frame, they usually use interpolation, rigs or some other stuff to save 90% of the time. If you want to cut the amount of labour and time then interpolation is usually good.

[@codeswift27]

Same! It already takes me ages to finish a single illustration *glances at my folder full of incomplete drawings*, I can't imagine drawing multiple frames within a reasonable amount of time

[@petSyeciD]

I normally animate at 24 fps. It actually gets easier once you get used to it. But I haven’t done animation with colored layers yet, so I may be misspeaking. But, hear me out. It’s not necessarily drawing the same exact thing over and over. You can simplify, merge two translucent layers. The key is to stretch out what ever you are animating as much as possible. Break boundaries. Use smear frames or blurred frames. Drawing the same thing over an over again actually makes it look really boring. If you break boundaries while simplifying, unless you over analyze the frames, it will have fluid motion and look pretty cool. Key frames are frames are the few frames in the animation that are the most detailed, and represent the basic motion. The rest you stretch and simplify and pull all you want. As long as they fall into place, and appear to have a general direction, specifically having a general direction from key frame to key frame. Sorry if this was too long to read, I just don’t like to see people who could genuinely be talented at this sort of thing be discouraged by the fact it is multiple drawings in a row. Trust me, it’s might be time consuming, but it’s really fun.

[@nilsqvis4337]

This perfectly illustrates diminishing returns. It does look better than 24 fps, but certainly not double the amount of work better.

[@lucaslucas191202]

It's not double the work if you use an algorithm to do it. The in between frames are mostly linear anyway due to the short time frames.

[@Pet_Hedgehog]

@@lucaslucas191202 yeah but algorithms have their limits for now, cant convert a 24fps vid to a 240 one, shit would just go wrong, so a lot of manual work is needed for high framerates making them really time intensive.

[@ItsGamein]

@@lucaslucas191202 ai also isn’t smart enough to do it properly, people have to guide it, even then it can hurt the animation a lot in certain situations

[@puppergump4117]

@@Pet_Hedgehog Yeah but animation software should be able to fill in the gaps. If every joint has an 'action' it can just do less of that 'action' and add more frames.

[@Pet_Hedgehog]

@@puppergump4117 well yeah but i was more thinking of completely hand drawn animation. So new stuff might be good for 60 or more but older animation might not.

[@ZayMagDumper]

dude i couldn’t even focus on the video the guitar is such a vibe . it was speaking to me . now i gotta rewatch the videos with my eyes open

[@jaedenter]

Even though making hand-animated 48 fps does look smoother, not only is it very hard to do both time-wise and drawing-wise, but it can make choppy movements from 24 fps that have more impact look like a less impactful and satisfying animation. Not that 48 is bad... but look at the end of the description to see what I mean.

[@omegazero5884]

Yea I agree but I feel like in the far of future we might see techniques develop for 48 fps.(If Animators decide to go for 48 fps. I know it's hard so you know always up to them) Like maybe having scenes that require a lot of impact go back down to 24 fps, or holding way more frames than needed. Just some hypotheticals coming from someone who doesn't animated and the knows only some of the most necessary rules.

[@wantedwario2621]

@@omegazero5884 You know this will never happen. A large chunk of the art community still thinks the human eye can only see up to 24 fps. Aside from that a lot of animators are extremely traditionalist, claiming that less frames = more stylized just because its what they are used to.

[@omegazero5884]

@@wantedwario2621 we might never know. Just as there are people who will stick to tradition , just as many are trying to go forward (not to say tradition is bad). I said we might see techniques for all I know we will skip 48 fps and go to some weird number I can't guess that's the fun of speculation it's not possible for us to know but we can try and think of it.

[@ZedDevStuff]

Well frame interpolation exists and it looks good

[@Novur]

I agree that it's a bunch of unnecessary time and effort, but the idea that animation at higher framerates is inherently less impactful seems to implicitly assume that the extra frames would be interpolated in the same way an A.I. would, by taking the mid-point of any motion and jamming a tween in. I disagree; I expect that in reality, hand-animation done at high framerates would be subject to the same artistic licence that artists take with motion and impact at standard framerates. You only need to look at something like the classic bouncing ball done at 6, 12, and 24 to see that it's perfectly possible to maintain a sense of stylization or exaggeration, but as you say, it's such a drain on resources that the only examples of high framerate animations seem to be limited to basic loops by hand, or soulless AI interpolated overcranks.

[@omgghxst4039]

seeing the quality setting on youtube say "1080p48" and "720p48" is hella trippy nice animation btw

[@CurseKingdom3445]

(I’m late ik) How does that work tho?I’ve never seen that

[@YellowSabre]

@@CurseKingdom3445 since the Actual video's fps is 48fps it adds 48 to the end

[@CurseKingdom3445]

@@YellowSabre Ohh so those numbers are the fps My bad

[@kiwi_2_official]

@@Hoopythehoop it's 47 seconds long

[@tidjane2001]

​@@kiwi_2_official 0:48 for me

[@suugiart]

1. This is really, really amazing animation skill. The animations and smooth and fluid and consistent, and we all love that. 2. FANCYPANTS VIBES.

[@andrew_cunningham]

It's really striking how jumping from 24 FPS to 48 immediately makes my brain shift from perceiving a hand-drawn animation to a recording of a 3D model.

[@Duck-eo7sf]

I can't tell the difference

[@mersvirus9593]

@@Duck-eo7sf ur on 480p

[@LocalGooberGoobs]

Yes! It’s stunning

[@jadencoucopoulos2567]

@MERS Virus✓ Or on the mobile app.

[@TheMapleDreamer]

​@@jadencoucopoulos2567 it works on the mobile app

[@hilotakenaka]

It kind of reminds me of games that use flash animation such as Fancy Pants But then again that might be the music also contributing to that feeling

[@ultralowspekken]

I was thinking the exact same thing

[@pauwula]

Oh shit you just unlocked a memory

[@Sinnohy]

I see, you're a man of culture as well...

[@hi_its_jerry]

yoo Fancy Pants is what got me into animation in the first place

[@reygenne1]

You're a certified chad B)

[@emimimix]

I used to animate as a hobby way back in ms/mid hs and haven’t able to get back to it for a while. seeing videos like this really give inspo and admiration to animating again

[@spongbob112CoolGumballk]

*YOU SUCK AT ANIMATION WATCH ME IM MUCH BETTER* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 0:48

[@Phi_Ton]

Bro I've been subscribed to you ever since your previous channels and the progress I've seen you make be it your animations and shitposts or music has always astounded me.

[@Mayyde]

Ayye thanks for sticking around for so long lol

[@Notllamalord]

Facts

[@ObbyFeathersnoot]

now use the interpolation AI to completely ruin it.

[@lapis8339]

Genius

[@gmdrandom6287]

RUNNING ANIMATION 1000 FPS (EMOTIONAL) (NOTCLICKBAIT)

[@gamecube8885]

For Life Action Videos or Movies, AI is Amazing with that, but with Animation God it's terrible, the since it's a computer doing it, not you manually doing at 60 frames, the computer doesn't know what's between the frames you drew, it's doesn't create new animation out of nowhere, and you see there's a smushed blurry effect, it just looks terrible, Using AI on Animation is a insult to the animator, that's the reason why they usually stick to 24 or 48 Frames, with animation you have to create a Frame by Frame, if you run it through the computer it's not just gonna magically what's between it, Again AI is Meant for Life Action, Because With Life Action it does know what's between it, Because that's what AI is for.

[@dionyzus2909]

@@gamecube8885 It doesn't know - yet (:

[@budgetyoutubechannel6128]

@@dionyzus2909 my opinion is that 60fps even if the ai gets better is not the future. It looks smooth, yes. but I think it loses alot of life. ofcourse i doubt it can't be used well but mostly I think it doesnt even look good to me when done without ai

[@Vision-ky7ew]

48 frames, 48 seconds, 4.8 million views Amazing ❤

[@plazma0325]

This is so fascinating. The difference in feeling between 24 and 48 frames per second is staggering. One feels familiar, like an old comic or book that you've read a hundred times. It looks cartoony, simple (and not in a bad way). The other looks *incredibly* vivid. Almost uncanny. Perhaps its just how unusual it is to see proper 48fps hand-drawn animation, but it feels like the animation is jumping out of the frame and showing off every single piece of itself. I would have loved to see more 48fps animation, if it weren't for the fact that my hand hurts from just thinking about animating something like this...

[@extrapathos]

Well said. It feels so surreal, like the only time I ever see a framerate that high is while playing videogames, I half expected to see some AI artifacts lol

[@coolfiretire12]

looks the same to me

[@aaronlandry3934]

It is uncanny, because it’s too smooth. It feels like it’s slower at the same speed and makes the movements look robotic almost

[@high_stakes_ikea7087]

@@coolfiretire12 Same- I straight up can't tell the difference at all 😅

[@apoppyworld]

Did you remember to adjust the resolution? KZbin defaults at 480p (at least for me) so I couldn't tell the difference too. But once I put it in 1080p48 the difference was enormous

[@Savage-tv4hs]

Almost feels like some kind of 3D projections instead of a 2D drawing once you move past 24fps. It's rare enough to see things animated entirely on ones at 24, let alone ones at 48.

[@elainasynranelt]

I though the same thing! It looks 3D.

[@llamas3655]

@@elainasynranelt it takes away from the artistry imo

[@mistertwister2000]

Stickman: 🏃 Guitarist: *this requires maximum riff*

[@AmandaDavis6130]

While the animation is neat, I’ve honestly never had an issue with 24fps. As you say in the description, it’s a heck of a lot more effort for what is, in my opinion, not that big of an improvement.

[@Squidmoto3]

If you animated the initial bit with something like Spine 2D, switching from 24 to 48 fps would literally just take typing in the number. You could even make it 60 fps just as easily. It's literally 0 more effort when you're being efficient.

[@schoolstablet100]

@@Squidmoto3 if it was that easy. Then why it wasn't done long ago? It feels like you don't know what you are saying. Also the feature you mention sounds like it depends on the different parts of the animation to be defined as vectors?

[@Squidmoto3]

@@schoolstablet100 I mean I absolutely know what i'm saying becuase i've literally done it... The reason it wasn't done that way is because most people don't know what Spine2D is and on top of that it's a $300 program. Next time do your research before embarrassing yourself little boy.

[@schoolstablet100]

@@Squidmoto3 alright, i will take the L for not knowing the program. Now looking at it, the animation it creates doesn't look nearly as fluid or smooth. Kinda clanky. And it doesn't look fit to create movies', short movies' type of animation which is presented in this video. And you didn't explain anything, other than just uh saying it does something. Do you have any examples of a piece created for a short movie and not for video games?

[@Squidmoto3]

@@schoolstablet100 The animation it creates is literally objectively smoother, and on top of that there are graphs you can edit to make it even smoother without spending time. And no I don't have example of that, because the program is fairly unknown and it's primary use is creating loops - like the walking loop in this video that could have literally been made in an hour.

[@moemuxhagi]

So smooth, yet so uncanny, 2D animation is rarely that fluid 🤣🤣

[@despondent27]

i mean, even actual movement doesnt look/feel that smooth, it really goes to show how more fps doesnt equal better

[@moemuxhagi]

@@despondent27 *insert Noodly sounds of agreement*

[@robbieaulia6462]

@@despondent27 Yeah because irl movements has motion blur in every frame, but 48 fps animation doesn't.

[@MsZiomallo]

I wish more animations were made for HFR...

[@blablabla7796]

@@despondent27 that’s not actually why. I think the reason why this doesn’t look as good as it should, is because the animator probably doesn’t know how to properly draw that many frames. At some point, we’re going to need to use some form of physics engine to properly convey movement momentums even in hand drawn animation if we’re planning to go higher than 24Hz drawn in ones.

[@tealover70]

ive been replaying this video countless times just to listen to the music lol

[@ZelphTheWebmancer]

When it changed from 24 to 48 fps I had the impression that the movement slowed down, probably because with higher framerate gives that illusion. Nice video.

[@zenixkiryu]

Weird, it actually looked like it started to move mildly faster to me.

[@spongbob112CoolGumballk]

*YOU SUCK AT ANIMATION WATCH ME IM MUCH BETTER* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 *YOU SUCK AT ANIMATION WATCH ME IM MUCH BETTER* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@TreeDragon]

Personal conclusion: Having still/jumpy frames is actually important for good feeling movement

[@ap4702]

Some Anime use it way to often to the point where it feels jarring to watch.

[@user-xh6ju3pg8c]

Anime is good at it

[@Pet_Hedgehog]

it makes the blur effect a like that we dont see at higher framerates even tho we should when the object moves fast, so it does make sense but for detailed stuff like animating a dude playing a guitar real fast high fps would make it look more imprrssive and intricate.

[@Ascyt]

I personally think the smoother the animation the better. But I don't think it's worth the effort, as even though you're pulling in twice the work it only looks a little better.

[@zenixkiryu]

Thats where emphasis comes in and slowing of movements. Total framerate does not need to be lowered by any means.

[@SureEnough]

I wish there were more money in the animation industry or something. This looks so beautiful. And things that actually go into production often times look more like a slide show with no illusion of movement whatsoever.

[@Wind-D]

It's somehow satisfying that the video is also 48 secs long and currently has 48k likes :)

[@kennethirgendwas4616]

my first thought was 'why would you want to do that to yourself' especially because ones would do just fine. but the animation isnt that complicated so i guess it isnt an insane amount of work to do twice the amount of frames edit: after actually watching this at 48 fps i gotta say this looks eerily smooth

[@user-xh6ju3pg8c]

No, is all still a lot of work, but you can include more Montenegro movements of the frame rate is higher power second

[@robbieaulia6462]

@@user-xh6ju3pg8c What on Earth is a Montenegro movement? I googled it and all I see is a revolution of the people of Montenegro which is irrelevant to animation.

[@ineptwombat8229]

Im just watching it over and over because the guitar is sooo goood!

[@uhhok8296]

This really makes me want to play with vastly different frame rates for different parts of the same scene. Kinda like how “Into the Spider-Verse” animated miles on twos when he started out and changed to ones later when he was more experienced. The first thing that comes to mind to try on is something like the whip animations from the Castlevania Netflix series, where maybe the whip itself is animated on ones or twos but the characters are animated in threes or even fours. Idk, its inspiring even to somebody who doesn’t predominantly work with animation.

[@ColdOne234]

Maybe just a personal interpretation, but it looked like 24 frames made it look like it had weight and 48 frames looked (for a lack of a better term) "floppy". Not bad, but just unexpected.

[@GoldStorm07]

Animation tends to use 24 since it's more feasible to crank out, so it's what our eyes are used to seeing. 48 isn't very common and as a result it tends to look odd.

[@Stag_Z]

That's what I've been saying, although it looks nice, for me it kinda feels like the more frames per second, the less weight the animation has.

[@gaylussac6156]

I like the smoothness of 48 FPS, but maybe that’s because I’m a gamer.

[@RipleySawzen]

Except you're probably more used to 12, 8, or even 6 FPS animation. Most people find 24 ("ones") to be way too smooth.

[@microdavid7098]

48 looks incredible. Floppy is pretty good. It's how a lot games turn out. I feel like it's more realistic but harder to get right. 24 looks a little harsh on the eyes

[@max_garcia]

My eyes and brain are hurting. Too smooth

[@hooper6769]

this must have been hell to make. a salute to you, my good friend.

[@ajvictorliwanag205]

This while vid is giving me the early days of KZbin vibe or as I like to call it: The "trance" era

[@TheMobiusAce]

gosh the music in the background is so nice, I'd love to hear more! I've never heard this kind of music and I would love to change that

[@tenacityxl]

So on one hand, it’s super smooth and looks genuinely amazing but the workload is way too much for it to ever be implemented into a show realistically. Imagine being on a project where the frame rate was 48 frames a second…

[@Shining4Dawn]

Most commercial 2D animation projects don’t even reach 24fps… or even 12. 48 is just out of the question.

[@tamtixx]

That's *just* 2880 frames for a minute.

[@MammalianCreature]

@@tamtixx I'm pretty sure shows don't even have 2880 animators, let alone 2880 frames per minute.

[@jeremias-serus]

Sure, but we’re not talking about how realistic it is to use. This is merely a testing to see which is more pleasing aesthetically, which, of course, the higher fidelity version is superior.

[@despondent27]

@@jeremias-serus really? in my opinion, as an albeit ameatuer artist and animator, i think while 48 fps looks more smooth, which i don't necessarily think is a hood thing, 24 fps felt more like real movement, and the slightly choppierness made it feel more alive. i just thing for that little amount of "improvement" doubling the animators already heavy workload just isnt worth it

[@cosmicchimp1939]

AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH. Bruh I tried this about a month ago AND IT TOOK ME SO FUCKING LONG. So many people don't realise how hard animation is.

[@Sky-sp1ym]

Istg animation channels are my main source of good music

[@vladdtronnz6924]

Okay, so the first animation takes approx. 4 seconds, 48 fps times 4 is 192 frames. Even if each frame takes one minute to draw that's still 3 hours and 12 minutes for 4 seconds of animation. Mad respect.

[@VYDEOS2]

You don't draw every frame from scratch bruh, sometimes you can just slightly tweak the previous frame

[@CluelessCarter]

@@VYDEOS2 this guy probably thinks Disney animators are spending a decade animating for a movie 😢

[@elsupermegan2079]

me, who had this in my recommendations: "ah yes, i do understand what is happening."

[@Ryan-mz4oe]

lol same here

[@microcosms2420]

I love these experiments artists do, it's almost like its a flex of power and control over what they want you to see.

[@mrcheshire104]

Absolutely gorgeous. I haven't seen this smooth of 2d animation in ages, it's so satisfying to watch!

[@MisSpace]

Reminds me of the early 2000's. People put their all in the animations. The music fits extremely well for the era aswell.

[@MrSpeakerCone]

Oh man, I love the look of the 48fps on ones so much! it's like I'm watching animation for the first time again!

[@cacheeck]

Holy sheit, the fluidity in the 48fps running! Wobbling of the hair! You, Sir, have patient hands. I envy You with my whole heart.

[@gryph0n55]

I know other people have already said so, but I think it would be a great idea to make a full version of the music you made for this and upload it. Idk it just sounds really good and I’d be interested to see it expanded into a full song

[@Lulu-Cat]

Me: trying to animate at 24 frames per sec The animation: JITTERRRRRRR

[@bowfuz]

the single most 3d-looking 2d hand-drawn animation, well done

[@YaburuRunyaru]

Ooh, I loved this 👀 Loved the music choice too 🔥

[@smokernoker]

do you know the music name ?

[@Blrrb]

@@smokernoker bro I’m also trynna find the music😭

[@spinniboi]

​@@Blrrb music is by Mayde too :)

[@Fish-films]

Can we take a minute to acknowledge that the video is 48 seconds long

[@pitrionox1359]

damn this looks so clean, i can tell a lot of effort was put into this, and keep up the great work

[@mossybossywossy]

people who don't animate will never know how incredibly impressive this is

[@ratxentherat]

Just because you don’t animate doesn’t mean you don’t know- I genuinely..I..this has to be one of the most stupid comments I’ve ever seen- 💀👉🚪

[@ratxentherat]

Also imagine liking your own comment lmao

[@Two_Teapod]

​@@ratxentherat shut up

[@FishyGull]

@@ratxentherat before I started Animating I didn't know how hard it is

[@slykanims6356]

​@@ratxentheratshut up

[@eyaph]

I love the smoothness, I’m not the best at animation but this looks really good

[@punusername3445]

First rule, it's not supposed to look good

[@robbieaulia6462]

@@punusername3445 But it does anyway which shows how good this guy is at animating.

[@dylanmcloughlin2187]

Dang. With the high framrate it feels like a really clean 3d model. Real cool looking. Nice job.

[@wizzy7000]

Me, sees this: I want to animate After the 100th frame: Screw it

[@user111real]

Your description perfectly explains why interpolation is garbage, and I'm glad to see that someone is actually talking about this.

[@_xxmidnight5351]

Why is this so satisfying WHY HAVE I BEEN WATCHING THIS FOR THE PAST HALF HOUR

[@rafit_3986]

The final result looks like a blend between 2d and 3d and it's amazing.

[@ubacow7109]

You can also try weird frame rates from anime that vary from 13-19fps and do doubles of those too, you don't always need to stick to the 12 fps multiples that school teaches you. And if 48 still looks too fast for you, you can always do 42.

[@Mayyde]

Anime usually sticks to 6fps-8fps for dialogue scenes and general movement, and then move to 12fps-24fps for specific moments where it's required. The only framerates you could emulate lower than 24fps are ones that cleanly divide 24 without decimals. Numbers like 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12. This is part of the reason why I think 24 tends to work so well. Splitting the frames into 2s [12fps], 3s [8fps], 4s [6fps], and so on doesn't cause any weird decimals or repeating numbers, since we can't have 6.3333333 or 5.5 as a proper framerate. Can't display a third of half a frame without causing issues.

[@oliogamer3975]

​@@Mayyde5.5 fps could be 11fp2s 😅

[@flameconvoy7424]

The high frame rate version immediately triggered memories of Fancy Pants Adventures, the fluidity is so satisfying

[@DavidHosey1]

What’s the song/riff in the background? It sounds great

[@DanielM2001]

He said in a comment below the he recorded the chords himself

[@Error_Roblox_]

I actually love high frame rate animation, it’s just so smooth

[@-.DIO.-]

idk why but i got fancypants adventures vibes from this

[@noobnoob8057]

48 fps looks clean af but its not worth overworking animators

[@LeoSucculent]

It look like the little animation next to the text saying "loading" in ps2 video games

[@MenacingTato69420]

48 frames. This video is 48 seconds long. This ladies and gentlemen, is not a coincidence. Get this man on the fbi watchlist.

[@SalmonBucket]

Someone: i gonna make this 60fps

[@SalmonBucket]

@@SiffingFrinMaxer i actually post this comment for the 60fps animation meme, but i learn many info from you. Thx for the interesting information about animation

[@SalmonBucket]

@@SiffingFrinMaxer you too buddy

[@kyle9915]

“Animation Experiments at 48 frames per second converted to 60FPS (Using AI!) (Not Clickbait).”

[@luffyxrubber]

Is nobody noticing that the video is *48* seconds?

[@zerosdreamverse2106]

The fact that the video is 48 seconds long too lmao

[@MaxIronsThird]

24fps looks much better, 48fps looks way too floaty and artificial. Also, 24fps isn't even used that often, most of the time it's 12/8/6fps, 24fps is only used for slow motion or very slow moving objects. High Hz is for games, where you need low latency between the controls and what happens on screen, not for non-interactive videos.

[@antonioglaeser4847]

48 frames per sec looks like 60, so smooth

[@CoralCopperHead]

"Check out my 48 FPS animation!" Me: _"Thanks for the headache."_ (No, seriously. This sub-minute video gave me a headache that only eased up during the 24 FPS demonstrations and still hasn't fully gone away by the time I've finished typing this.)

[@qmulus_yt]

this must've been a pain

[@ru_theworld2486]

This was so satisfying to watch lol. I just wanted to know, what animation software do you use? I've wanted to get into animating for quite some time now, but I think I wasted my money on csp (Clip Studio Paint EX) ;-;. If you DO use csp, can you give me some tips please? (Like how to hECKING COPY AND PASTE-)

[@Mayyde]

I use a bunch of different types of animation software. For the 48FPS runcycle animation, I used Flash 8. For a bunch of my other stuff, I use TVPaint 11, Adobe Animate, and traditional mediums.

[@solareclipse1468]

It’s so smooth that it looks 3D. I can already feel the pain in my wrist from watching that

[@Phenriir]

“Remember. You’re not lazy, you’re weak.” - Sun Tzu

[@ThahaBashir]

The higher framerates were cool but they also felt quite weird. That being said, it's really nice 👍 but I doubt it's worth double the effort.

[@svetaAFG]

Dude I can't this music fries my brain

[@watamesshepherdjesuschrist6792]

Most Anime only do 24 FPS and we can see their insane animations like AOT, Demon Slayer, One Punch Man etc. Imagine if they have the option to do 48FPS

[@heckmelon9818]

unfortunately its just impossible. It would completely double their already MASSIVE workload and probably literally kill some people

[@ZedAmadeus]

@@heckmelon9818 Yeah, crunch in anime studios is already doing that practically... Imagine doubling the amount of frames, in the process tripling the workload since you have to clean up all of those inbetweens so they're precise and don't look jittery or messy

[@purple.st4rz_556]

That would take A LOT longer and be a pain in the butt.

[@MrSirSquishy]

24 fps seems a lot more natural, 48 is smooth yes but is doesn't feel natural, it doesn't have the same impact, speed, and emphasis to it.

[@BusyCapybara]

I just see someone running but better

[@thecousinwithaforesaken]

It looks so 3D like a video game!

[@davawen9938]

I find the 48 FPS version looks noticeably worse because it completely ruins timing

[@reacher12345]

Not liking the 48fps version is fine but using timing as an excuse for this animation in particular doesn't make sense.

[@Lulu-Cat]

Yea.. it’s basically the same timing since they’re tweening…

[@Xenderman]

If this were interpolated by AI, I would have agreed with you. This is something made by an artist, though. There's no AI in sight

[@TeluguSuperhumans]

48 seconds long video 😮

[@Flare-D1]

48 seconds Of 48 frames per second We got a 48-squared, bois

[@the_real_boogeyman]

bruh 48 frames looks worse than 24 for some reason

[@Coleusse]

I thought of this video last night, couldnt remember what it was called, and then wake up to have it in my recommended???

[@Thetheproto]

Animation: smooth. Music: crunchy. Beautiful

[@Carbon-cringe-human]

That's smoother than the cream cheese you put on a bagel

[@harasen_haras5]

That must've taken a WHILE. That's a lot of in-betweens you've needed.

[@owenpattaylor]

Always lovely to see high frame-rate animation done by an artist, very well done.

[@CassiniA312]

It looks better with 48fps but i know that it isn't worth it for twice the effort that the animators need to do. And I agree that 60fps with interpolated AI looks worse

[@birdcat7762]

IT LOOKS SO SMOOTH!! I COULD NEVER YOU HAVE A TALENT

[@Elektronyx97]

Bro draws at more fps than my pc can handle on games 💀💀

[@8834]

0:12 “Hurry up now, activate the doors!”

[@OctoberSammara]

Woah that was so beautifully smooth that my eyes felt soothed.

[@testchannelnamechangingsoo1160]

man that 48 frames per second gave me chills for some reason. keep up the good work 👍

[@lourdesgonzales2256]

Why is it so satisfying to see a high fps animation