Answering IQ questions as if I have 300 IQ

[@tibees]

Problem solving starts at 3:06. The description contains a link to how I found the polynomial function used in question 1. The comments have pointed out that I made some minor mistakes reducing my IQ to 299. I should have added 1 to the modulo answer since A was indexed to 1. In the last question A & B look like they could be both correct.

[@spinLOL533]

Tibees hello

[@YTDevastation]

I just dmed you in insta lol

[@peaceonearth8693]

I bet you and your huge 300 brain have cult status in zombie society. :-]

[@stian.nygard]

You looked good with a big head;-)

[@LALA-yi1ui]

😂 the thumbnail is so funny!

[@ottobac1127]

I like how she's very proper and genuine when it comes to shitposting

[@asron1294]

There are only 420 gender bruh😂

[@AmarjitSingh-ts9rm]

Hahahhh got yeah bro!

[@anemone_aki]

There are only 420 gender 😂🤣😂🤣 very true

[@ang5798]

The British way

[@hanadikadayunan5648]

"And this video is a bit if a joke" 😂

[@alisonjershin1124]

6:45 "number c" only someone with 300 iq could say some thing so controversial yet so brave

[@zaingova9140]

Is that a little Eric Andre joke

[@stevethea5250]

Number cthree

[@BallyBoy95]

But c, correlates to the letter 3. So she is not wrong...

[@thephysicistcuber175]

I mean c=1.

[@snivythefencer2898]

Number c obviously refers to the +c of an indefinite integral.

[@---zt8su]

“The role of genius is not to complicate the simple, but to simplify the complicated.”

[@abhradeepdey9054]

Exactly

[@abhradeepdey9054]

But the definition has became the opposite these days

[@Kamal-ju6qx]

This is the exact opposite😂

[@Kamal-ju6qx]

@Iowa Zebra i mean the video not his quote

[@zero5496]

Seems to me usually iq exam do the opposite thing, I do have high score but I still think it’s just trifling boring, I don’t think it’s the best way to test intelligence but just intellect, yeah I guess, it’s pretty much just basic logic

[@rysiof]

pattern: a, d, g, j could also end with L (separate by 1 key in QWERTY keyboard)

[@duongkstn]

brilliant , ID 3000 Lol

[@filiphalcisak4721]

lol

[@monarch0243]

wow

[@annajoaquinaosorio2070]

Genious

[@nissieln]

Polynomial IQ growth detected EDIT: actually brillant, creative thinking, intelligent observation.

[@ViralKiller]

You could definitely gain an extra 30 points by doing lots of IQ tests prior to the exam, which defeats the whole purpose of a raw intelligence test

[@randomTVSWE]

there's a limit to your iq increase. Therefore it's still accurate.

[@masscantbecreatedordestroy8868]

Arguably, studying for an IQ test shows that you care about seeming smart, so it may be an indicator of intelligence.

[@dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002]

@@masscantbecreatedordestroy8868 agree

[@MrTheclevercat]

You actually can't. Try it yourself. You can't practice IQ tests to get much better results.

[@hereforthememes.8466]

@@MrTheclevercat That is definitely not true. I remember preparing for the NTSE exam back in 10th grade which included 2 papers, SAT and MAT(Mental Ability Test) we actually had classes in our school specifically to tackle mental ability questions on this exam, and I had a pretty decent score increase compared to the first time I tried a sample test and compared to the day before my exam.

[@poopyakuza8891]

"314 is an approximation of pi" 300IQ indeed

[@scienceseeker8377]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@monad_tcp]

engineers be like PI = 3

[@rickmonarch4552]

@@monad_tcp Programmers be like: >.> PI is a function :3

[@stumbling]

30 000 IQ (approx.)

[@stumbling]

@@rickmonarch4552 Hey, in bash scripting "true" is technically a file so... :P

[@mrhed0nist]

IQ tests are great for finding out how good you are at IQ tests.

[@1600-i6p]

Also one of the most powerful measurements in all of science in terms of its predictive validity.

[@michaelworkman4057]

@Guybrush Threepwood yes they do tend to correlate but not as much as some might assume

[@hugochauvin2923]

And for destroying or boosting your self-esteem.

[@mrhed0nist]

@Guybrush ThreepwoodYou could say the same thing about a persons height ;)

[@davidkieltyka9]

They’re good for much more than that, but they don’t capture the entirety of intelligence. Evaluating procedural, analytical capability…this is their forté. This covers much of what we call intelligence but doesn’t account so well for intuitive thinking: the “conceptual leap.”

[@drguy9651]

teacher: a, d, g, j. what comes next? big brain student: b! teacher: wrong! it’s actua- big brain student: well according to the equation y=301/24x^4...

[@lavenderscent2334]

Me: w-

[@talelhammami9845]

haha nice one

[@plusunim]

what happens to the model when you include M in the data set?? huh?? Which is the primary source: the data set or the model??

[@RENGITHFOX]

But y did she pick random numbers like that???

[@lopsumtathro]

thats not any more clever than finding the right answer , which is most logical the overly complex or the simplex? Its stupid to expend more energy than necessary! Ego 300_ IQ 0

[@melindasordinospeak]

"I watched rick and morty before doing this, so I should be good" 🤣

[@mattsmith457]

"Circles have 1 side" *Several people are typing...*

[@flackoso2]

😂

[@mikethegamedev]

circle has infinite sides

[@mattsmith457]

@@mikethegamedev I thought an infinite sided polygon would be a fractal? Can anyone confirm if it's 0 or infinity?

[@lestercrest9891]

It's actually 0

[@thejavaman53]

Oops, I belong to that category.

[@Max-xx8ox]

Someone asked Einstein ”How it feels to be the smartest person on earth“ And Albert Einstein answered: ” I wouldn’t know ask Tibees“

[@deviljho4260]

Windy God this quote doesn’t fit too well since the original was sarcastic

[@mydickisunbelievablysmallb8132]

There have been several people smarter that him actually, IQ wise.

[@centralprocessingunit2564]

but Nikola Tesla is way smarter than einstein

[@ivoryas1696]

@@deviljho4260 -It was?-

[@Bebolife12345]

Magnus Carlsen G O A T Ugh. The actual quote mentions Tesla. But Einstein and Tesla weren’t chummy with eachother - so it was likely sarcastic.

[@alflaylawalayla]

6:44 number C, truly 300 IQ right there

[@Fallkhar]

Well of course, 'tis 12 in hex.

[@baruchespinoza6703]

@@Fallkhar Actually it is the constant of the speed of light

[@_bigdipper]

Glad to see that you also watch Richard and Mortimer, my big brained fellow.

[@tibees]

🥒

[@SeekingCreation]

Hello fellow ween liker

[@_bigdipper]

@@SeekingCreation Hello, good tasted mang.

[@arne9518]

Thiago xD

[@MrNathanovic]

My sides :')

[@LEXICOGRAFFER]

"Tibee, or not Tibee: that is the Question!" -Omelet

[@ninadachrekar7215]

🍳

[@oscarpatault1824]

Spich↗️

[@StiegeNZ]

I really like Tibee's casual, understated humor.

[@MichaelMarteens]

6:15 "There is nothing wrong with how I got it, and it is perfectly valid." Would love to see a face cam as you said that to see if you held a straight face.

[@philophysics7423]

In my opinion she 100% meant it w a straight face, she’s trying to show how IQ tests are suppose to test intelligence by checking if you can recognize patterns, but instead of testing for that they offer “right” and “wrong” answers, which isn’t how pattern seeking works.

[@katjam]

That’s the issue I have with some pattern problems. Sometimes I reason through my logic of justifying an answer but I’m wrong. Why am I wrong if it’s mathematically and logically correct? Sometimes you can form multiple sequences, especially if there’s only three or four numbers or diagrams. Sometimes there’s more than one solution.

[@MelvinGeremillo]

@@katjam and sometimes given the pattern in number one, it could suggest 2 patterns. one for M and one for B

[@nlab97]

It is indeed valid given that using the exact same process for the previous digits gives the correct result.

[@sikoo31]

She's like, never straight-faced tho. She's always smiling

[@ryanyates6761]

Mensa: Tibees: i'm going to do what is called a 'pro gamer move'

[@ryanyates6761]

@@nagihangot6133 um.. ok. Thank you Nagihan. Not sure why you felt the need to tell me this

[@hughmungus7933]

@@ryanyates6761 what did he tell you?

[@lazarustaxon7775]

@@hughmungus7933 Agreed

[@prakharanand7012]

"Albert Einstein" ~ Albert Einstein

[@nissieln]

Narrated by Albert Einstein with Morgan Freeman voice

[@Liam-e6q]

Wow that's deep

[@mobinmaher7520]

"Obama" ~Obama

[@Leo-dq6jh]

@@mobinmaher7520 "Morgan Freeman" ~Morgan Freeman

[@milliesbiggestfan]

"Mickey Mouse" ~ Mickey Mouse

[@carlocatalano9662]

Your deadpan comedy charm is off the scale for any genius, it's always a real ride, thank you.

[@trime547]

Jokes on you, the correct answer to the first question is "l", just look at your keyboard.

[@peterbrough2461]

I bow to your magnificent percipience. I am not worthy.

[@martiddy]

Actually the correct answer is 42

[@erickr199]

Mensa wants to: *Know your location*

[@elliot5843]

@@martiddy wtf

[@systemoutprinthakim]

Please master, accept me as your disciple!

[@Douken]

4:21 “I’m going to do the natural thing here which is to insert a polynomial” 😂 😂😂🤣

[@Felixr2]

To be honest, saying "we move 3 places up in the alphabet each time" is literally the same thing as insterting the polynomial y = 3x - 2. She just used a different, equally valid polynomial.

[@factsverse9957]

It actually is natural since we have four terms that we know, which means we can fit a fourth degree polynomial because we have to use everything we know, right? 🙃

[@unknownworld6171]

" Natural "!!!

[@Myrslokstok]

I actually tought about that sentance a few weeks ago: - sometimes that is actually a good thing to do. She comes across as off the shart smart.

[@abustefano8225]

@@Felixr2 You are right, indeed. Why should we make things so complicated?

[@beabapoopee]

thank you!! this has increased my iq from 0.2 to 0.7

[@CrimsonKnightmare1]

Your iq is so small, if it were to get any smaller, im sure a blackhole would form

[@beabapoopee]

CrimsonKnightmare indeed so 😎😎😎

[@James-fe7wd]

@@beabapoopee I always thought chairs made great brain nutrition

[@beabapoopee]

James they do!! no wonder my iq increased by so much :0

[@centralprocessingunit2564]

HAHAA

[@knofffernworth9573]

*During Maths class Me: Looks away for 0.01 second The Board: 4:56

[@janhabibarat7271]

So true lol

[@THE_BROWN_SIBLINGS]

Me too same. So relatable

[@trblemker00]

Them maffs are hard mate

[@yelena_]

This video increased my IQ tenfold, I can now play 4D chess. Thanks

[@tanvikhare9710]

I read 4D cheese. I like the idea of 4D cheese. What are your views on 4D cheese?

[@ezego3791]

@@tanvikhare9710 I think we should start teaching 4d cheese at school, it is too much underrated on the mathematical community

[@Flesh_Wizard]

@@tanvikhare9710 it's a gouda idea

[@physicsisawesome696]

@@Flesh_Wizard Google en passant

[@nezzisclouted9329]

300 IQ plays by Tibees

[@yan-qu5zm]

EU plays

[@neilwilson5785]

198 IQ(upvotes) now. I did a test in 1975 and got 114. Now I work in not delivering complex projects.

[@angusyoung5702]

Um yes? That’s literally what this videos about

[@Em-yd9jn]

@@yan-qu5zm NA smol brain 1 major EU 69420 huehuEhUe

[@raghavdodla1376]

@@yan-qu5zm what???

[@gavinmurray9689]

She confidently says "I'm sure you know what Mod is" Me: no clue what mod is

[@stevethea5250]

Me neither

[@serra541]

same

[@kath.andrews]

@- Joshwa34 - I didn't understand. God, I'm stupid as hell! Lol

[@Solaris428]

@@kath.andrews x mod y means: on a planet where there are y hours a day, we started counting from midnight and since then, x hours have passed, what time is it?

[@Kostanovi]

That's high school stuff dude...Come on.

[@sly4164]

Imagine going to Mensa and arguing the answers like this 💀💀💀

[@Myrslokstok]

There is no arguing there. I took a real IQ test by a professional psycologist. It was on time as well and on the first question I answered: - they are all primenumbers. Then I had to have an argument about what primenumbers are, and that 2 is one of them 😂 - she was still compleetly confused about my answer.

[@sly4164]

Myrslokstok Oh my god... Imagine someone administering an IQ test not knowing basic number theory

[@The_Elite_Players]

They will tell the aplicant "go away, dude" The first one is wrong cause you choosed degree 4 for the interpolation formula, wich is arbitrary, it starts with an "a" so the degree is clearly 1 for the polinomial... Answer M 2nd There is no reason for search it will be equal in the second example it will be even better if you just do the exact same thing as the first question And the third one... Come on if you said that is 90 degrees then your IQ actually is 300 or more corretly 60

[@maxime9006]

They’d probably praise you for it, mensa is ridiculous

[@naudzy]

@@Myrslokstok thats sooo true haha i can relate to that

[@jorgenskyt]

I love this! My first number of tests at Mensa gave me a score at >164 and I was asked to go to further tests in London. That was not interesting for me. I entered in a series of arguments with Mensa people, as I was convinced you CAN train to perform better in their tests, to which they declined. My background in computer science and as a programmer told me, that it was especially fortunate, if you knew how to perform NAND, NOR, XOR, OR and AND operations on a graphical level. But the Mensanians tutoring the test didn't even know the meaning of these logical operations so I lost all faith in their ability to grasp even the slightest snip of their own definition of what "intelligens" means ... *SIGH*

[@sin3358]

YESSSSSSSSS!!! People who works in computer related fields are more likely to score higher because they work with patterns a lot!!!!!!! And you can absolutely score higher if you do a lot of IQ tests

[@jorgenskyt]

@@sin3358 ... you are SO right! ;-) That is my argument. Thank You! :-)

[@cyberbunny3339]

I am a specialist in computer science and I am making my own Super Artificial Intelligence

[@eizeoosting843]

On the first question, before any answer, me: “well that ovbiously must be an M”, Tibees: “the low IQ or average IQ will say it is an M” 🤣

[@chiraghalai7679]

You were correct according to the answer scheme of this test it’s M she just overcomplicated it

[@कुमारनिशित]

Even simple things have got some big complex polynomials behind them . Are you sure if it's 1,2,3,4, then 5 should the next number in the sequence ? . some exponential or some complex function might be governing the pattern.

[@gsalicru65]

@@कुमारनिशित If you just have the information of 1,2,3,4 and you have to choose between 4 options and one of them is 5 then the correct one is probably 5. There is no need on trying other things that only make the problem harder when an easier option is correct.

[@कुमारनिशित]

@@gsalicru65 ask her, haha. She will definitely come up with some weird governing equations.

[@gsalicru65]

@@कुमारनिशित No she won't. The answer to the sequence of letters was obviously m. You can try to think of a different answer to get more points but the one you will think the first is m. The test idea is to see how you think but you should answer with the first idea that comes to your mind. You can think about uncommon patterns answers at first but there is no way you decide to do a polynomial instead of counting the letters of the alphabet.

[@sarthakshah1058]

This video gave me confidence to play 5D chess

[@Malakai9]

You are quite behind intellectually speaking my friend. Every year I add an additional dimension to my chess playing skills. Currently I play 25 D chess. Sometimes I even play it backwards and phonetically.

[@deviljho4260]

Tom Yabbo pffft imbeciles I can play chess in the 74.15647th dimension

[@centralprocessingunit2564]

@@deviljho4260 fool I can play it in the 0th dimension

[@filipe_paixao]

ALL YOU FOOL! I play chess in JOJO DIMENSION

[@dehanbadenhorst1398]

That's for the intellectually insignificant. I can play multiple 5 dimensional chess games simultaneously whilst wearing a blindfold.

[@steviewonder9752]

This is my type of ASMR to cure my blindness. A couple more videos of this and i"ll be able to see 20/20 and see into the Russian government.

[@tibees]

🤔

[@michaelworkman4057]

Help him Tibee

[@supercool1312]

Stevie Wonder what government. its basically a dictatorship

[@user-oo2gz9ln8v]

this sucks

[@JoyoSnooze]

Isn't she lovely?

[@GeodesicBruh]

I’ve never seen a classier shitpost than this. Thank you.

[@juanalonso5797]

"A circle has one side" ~300IQ

[@Osirion16]

Well, technically a circle has an infinite amount of sides. Take for example, an octogon : it's gonna have 8 sides and look somewhat like a circle. Now take a polygon with 20 sides and you're gonna realize it's gonna get rounder and rounder until sides are too small to be seen and at this point many people would call it a circle ( search for an image of a chilliogon for a concrete example )

[@pattyg5502]

@@Osirion16 I believe it is learned in calculus 2. Calculating the exact area of a circle by using triangles. Edit: I forgot that the method I'm describing is fairly uncommon. I wish I could type out a formula in the comments, but I can't :(. You are 100% correct though. I do think she was saying a circle is 1 side just so she doesn't have to write 5 pages of proof. Intelligence is understanding something to a complex level, genius is being able to not only apply those concepts, but being able to explain them on the most basic of levels.

[@mbraga0]

Not only you are very intelligent, but you have a natural ASMR voice. I liked this video :)

[@tacticaltaco7481]

Acktually, for the first question, if you count the number of holes in the symbols written on the page, you get 1 1 2 0. This clearly indicates the number of times the pen must be pressed to the paper to draw the succeeding symbol. The correct answer is therefore an empty space. That said, I do think with these things they are looking for the simplest possible conclusion, and in that case I would have to say the answer for all questions 1 through 8 should just be a comma (,) as each sequence has an alternating pattern where half the pattern is always a comma.

[@janhabibarat7271]

I award 10021 IQ to you.

[@engboy69]

Yes, but for question 1 if we assign binary values instead of base 10 a=0001, d=0100, g=0111, and j=1010. We can visualise the 1's as moving to the left. The first 1 moves two places at a time. Once we get to 'g' the first '1' has moved off completely, in accordance with its two places left per letter change, and three new 1's have appeared. We can infer from 0111 changing to 1010 that the first 1 has moved off the screen, the second one has moved 2 places left, and the third one has moved 1 place left. Continuing this pattern (and assuming no new 1's ) we can see the next number should be 0100 or the letter 'd' again. SOLVED #300iqclub r/iamverrysmart However, if we continue the pattern of alternating between no new 1's and three new 1's per letter change the only possible solution is 1111 which corresponds to 'o'. Either way there's no way the 'm' is the answer..

[@ultrazenom1500]

NANI???

[@randomdude9135]

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

[@robosing225]

I'm confused as to how you got 0100 or the second 'd'. Does a 1 that falls off end up on the right hand side of the binary? Or does it just fall off? Also, what dictates how many times a 1 moves to the left? 1010 to 0100 is odd because it doesn't adhere to the original pattern change to 0111 to 1010. With 0111 to 1010, the first 1 moves 2 places and falls off. The second 1 in 0111 swings 2 places to left, leaving the last 1 to swing 1 place ending in 1010. I totally get that. I just don't see how if you follow that same pattern, you end up with 0100. Perhaps I can see how 1010 to go to 1111. The first 1 drops off, that second 1 swings two places to left, and 3 new 1s appear ending in 1111 like you said. I get that. I just couldn't see how 0100 could come about following the pattern with no new 1s. I say this because to get from 1010 to 0100, the first 1 falls off. But why does the second 1 move one place to the left and not 2 places to be 1000? It doesn't follow the original pattern with no new 1s.

[@engboy69]

@@robosing225 I understand your confusion, you must only have an IQ of 299 not 300 like me. Let me catch you up. when 0111 goes to 1010 the 1 on the far right has only moved one space left so it follows that it would only move one space left again in the next step, now in the third position, and the other one moves two spaces (as you said) this leaves 0100. Thanks for the reply!

[@robosing225]

@@engboy69 haha. Great reply Student Engineer. Elucidation has been achieved! Thank you. My 299iq thanks you for expounding on your binary pattern principle. Have a good day!

[@diggydude5229]

"You should take no more than 20 minutes to complete the test." Tibees: "Polynomials. Yeah, that's the ticket."

[@skorpioflo]

"You should take no more than 20 minutes to complete the test..." - Excuse me, 20 what? Years?

[@liqritrs8391]

Minutes. . You wrote it in your comment, you sciolist

[@ShorumTOO]

Deeply honored to use the same pen of a genius! I gained almost +4 on my IQ 😁

[@hornetluca]

Just hearing your accent makes me happy

[@spinLOL533]

hornetluca same

[@Alex-jbz]

It's soothing

[@felixlynch7327]

I'm here for the math wtf is wrong with you fetish freaks? - edit; i would like to thank those of you who are still liking this 2 month old comment keep on grinding kings🙏💪🏻🙏💪🏻🍑🍑🍑🤞🏻

[@hornetluca]

@@felixlynch7327 hahahha

[@hornetluca]

@Amapk Eirk hahahah

[@rickrick5041]

This proves that with genius there is usually insanity

[@Nopenotatall]

Rick rick ^^^ here’s the stupidity

[@rickrick5041]

Nope Nope Where?

[@AnkheMiliBadoBadi]

Your voice is so soothing that i use your videos to fall asleep.

[@eizeoosting843]

beingjokerforever National Geographic needs to hire her for documentaries 😁

[@shanineedwards6894]

This just shows how creative you are >~

[@LeventK]

This KZbin recomemendations has a funny sense of humor.

[@madhavsingh7345]

The vsauce music played in my head when she said 90 degrees.

[@LisaBeergutHolst]

I understand this reference *...or do I?*

[@bhavikajangid8579]

@@LisaBeergutHolst 😂😂

[@jessesit8288]

I really loved this video. Couldn’t stop laughing all the way through. Thanks Tibees. As expected of a 300 IQ youtuber, well, 299 one.

[@neurophilosophers994]

I watch so much Rick and Morty I’ve watched them back wards and I can tell you for a fact that my IQ is at least 420.

[@justaperson4242]

Rick is best!

[@thomastylesx5769]

More like 4.20

[@watchout4520]

Genius is who can explain something very complicated in a simple way

[@danthrift]

Starting with a pattern and then finding a whole deepening set of future patterns is often what is happening when composing music, or playing chess or playing jazz. The results from time to time can be heartbreakingly beautiful, transcending the usual pedestrian results obtained from a mere Mensa question. I had dinner with one of the leaders of Mensa in San Francisco once. I said, “Isn’t it true that of all the people in our country that COULD join Mensa, only 3% of them actually do it?” She nodded. So, I continued, “Does that mean that they’re all stupid?” She hit me with her fork! True story. I have shared your videos several times on Facebook. They’re really good.

[@NutziHD]

I know this vid is a joke, but it perfectly pokes fun at the absurdity of the ridgity of those tests - well done 👍

[@nymbusDeveloper86]

Not really. But yeah the video is funny.

[@thelightningwave]

5:54 In modular arithmetic you add an extra line to the equals sign, with three parallel lines. Which means you have an IQ of 299 and not 300.

[@methandtopology]

Three parallel lines means equivalent, and it is used in proofs and logic to denote equivalency. IF you use it in modular arithmetic, you would say 2 equivalent to 4 (mod 2), unless it is implied in context. They are not equivalent outside of modulo

[@gubblfisch350]

also 299=300 mod 1

[@rusejames7242]

In a book written by Terence Tao he uses two lines 😯😯

[@twami86]

I'm about to do what's called a pro *maTHeMAtICiaN* move.

[@yogitshankar6348]

Were the bold letters supposed to mean something? I didn't get it

[@midievel8479]

This video makes me feel as unworthy as Iron Man when he tried lifting Thor’s hammer 🔨

[@midievel8479]

Watching the same video a year after and realizing that this is my comment from a year ago. lol

[@midnightchurningspriteshaq8533]

What makes this amazing is that even though you said it was a joke and I grinned the way you approached it made me forget that it was a joke and I grinned twice. Also the ability to solve and relate things is worth appreciating and approaching it humorously is clearly one of the best ways. Thumbnail: 10/10 Making me forget it was a joke: 11/10

[@1994mrmysteryman]

You're one of those people that I can't imagine ever getting angry. Like... what would that even look like... or sound like. With that soft voice.

[@gestaltlatseg]

Like a dolphin squeaking vigorously

[@slntscpe]

She would be like , you seem angry ...lets count the number of sound waves coming out of your mouth

[@vk2ig]

"Like... what would that even look like... or sound like." I suspect that is something we really would not like to learn ...

[@ypey1]

She doesnt get angry, she breaks you mentally... to the ground... you’d end up in a mental hospital

[@tibees]

>:(

[@JoeyFknD]

12:03 A true 300 IQ person knows a circle has infinitely many sides.

[@etherealstars5766]

It has an infinite number of tangent lines, but no secants - no two points are connected with a line. Therefore, no sides!

[@maelstrom57]

it has 1 round side

[@Srikchik]

@Anifco67 you are not wrong

[@breadloaf666]

@Anifco67 ...what?!

[@Mi_fuente_es_TikTok_y_dice--]

You are right, and he is right, but also im right.

[@Kryoclasm]

Interesting video Tibees. I would argue that IQ is the measure of intelligence amongst a common group with a common background. I would also state that what you were doing was more like attempting to model an Alien intelligence that has little in common with the group the test was designed to evaluate. Those Ailen answers may be the common-sense way of approaching a problem due to the way the Alien intelligence' mind is wired. Keep making videos, I find them very interesting.

[@colinjbanks]

Thanks Toby. I enjoy reading all the comments from pretentious people who are trying to come up with intellectual wit in an attempt to make people think they are more intelligent than you. Thank you.

[@scottaseigel5715]

In the course Psychological Assessment I spent HOURS trying to explain what you so beautifully covered in under 15 minutes! The conclusion of my final paper was that the only intelligence that matters is situational intelligence: how quickly and how effectively naturally occurring problems are solved. What’s ironic is that my theory pre-dated Goleman’s EQ and various other multiple intelligence paradigms, yet in my paper I mention that a person who is able to motivate other people to solve their problems may actually be the smartest person as can be measured by economic success, fame or aggregate accomplishments as a collaborator (think Paul Erdos). If we MUST find a score, then we must use unambiguous puzzles which aren’t subject to the vague pattern nuances you’ve exposed. Games like chess and go provide good examples, but our puzzles should be novel so they are unfamiliar to each subject, and less divergent perhaps rewarding the fewest steps to a solution or the fewest pieces left after trying to remove all the pieces according to some rule. Linguistic intelligence is definitely different, depending on synthesizing a system. Social intelligence depends on discovering and exploiting social roles and rules. While I believe any true form of intelligence is innate, I do not believe any as yet standardized IQ is a good predictor for success in life. Emotional intelligence may come the closest, but the most important step is first defining success and that’s far more about individual subjective values than about officially sanctioned and objective measures.

[@bocckoka]

the 'b' character solution was not correct, since you used one based indexing. the range of the modulo is zero .. n-1, so you should have added one there, so, 'c'.

[@shehannanayakkara4162]

Well 26 would be Z, and so would 52, 78,... 312. Then 313 would be A and 314 would be B.

[@circularobjects806]

Oh dear😂 think about what u wrote down.

[@joekerr5418]

smol pp :(

[@donald-parker]

At the 4:45 mark you had me laughing out loud. Well done!

[@neilwilson5785]

Actually funny. A big ask for me , who is utterly cynical, but she did it. Damn.

[@nahuelporta1648]

I didnt get that :( would u explain?

[@donald-parker]

BTW - if you want a ploynomial that matches the first 4 numbers, you get 3x-2 which predicts M as the 5th letter :)

[@Ayryvyl]

Wow... She can transcend the limit of a perfect 100 IQ?

[@warrenphilips8441]

Lol

[@Aditya_V_R]

wait you mean to tell me 50/50 isn't a perfect iq

[@danbhakta]

IQ = 100(Mental Age/Physical Age)

[@ncedwards1234]

100 means brain dead, lower scores are better, that's why I got a 70, not to FLEX. I know cause I saw the meta pattern.

[@Felixr2]

@@ncedwards1234 What, 70? Try 7.

[@nmayes1984]

Sequence 3 is the ordered values of the partitions function P(0) = 1, P(1) = 1, P(2) = 2, P(3) = 3, P(4) = 5 and P(5) = 7 because there are 7 ways to add positive integers to create 7. Sequence 6 is 65536, 256, 16, 4 since the first term is the square of the second, the second is the square of the third, so the third term must be the square of a number. Sequence 7 is probably alternating series 1, 0, -1, 0, 1, 0, -1, 0, ... Sequence 8 is 3968, 63, 8, 3, 2 since the first term is the square of the second minus one, the second term is the square of the third minus one, the third term is the square of the fourth term minus one, and so the fourth term is 3 which is the square of 2 after subtracting one. The only difficult one is the partition sequence. The pattern ones are stupid because if you took a bunch of shrooms you would fail the test even with a 300 IQ.

[@mitskis_bf]

Off topic but : Toby has the most relaxing voice I have ever heard. Period.

[@nezzisclouted9329]

ITS BIG BRAIN TIME

[@aravindhkumar3976]

Poods

[@erickr199]

BIG BRAINNNNNNN

[@WhitEagle7]

dude! This is one of the most subtle trolling I've seen on the internet :D I applaud you, Tibees!

[@zedrin517]

I agree

[@peterjrmoore3941]

This is so reassuring. I would often come up with several just as valid answers on these stupid IQ tests and I would then think I just have to guess what the examiner or tester would've thought. I had the same problem in high school when calculus was presented to me. I had a tremendous problem with "taking the area of an infinite number of rectangles." I used to think I was stupid for a variety of reasons - it turns out later that when I was studying philosophical logic at Oxford University that indeed there was quite a serious problem in the philosophy of mathematics especially in the construction of the continuum. No wonder I was confused. I ended up graduating with writing one of the top two papers in Philosophical Logic in my year. I still suffer from this sort of thing because we live in such a rule bound culture, especially when it comes to thinking.

[@HenningDieterichs]

Usually, a "logical" consequence is an application of the simplest (i.e. syntactically shortest) rule that can explain all known facts. Observation: On Monday, it does not rain and the ground is not wet. On Tuesday, it rains and the ground is wet. Question: On Wednesday it rains. Is the ground wet? Rule 1: The ground is covered and every Tuesday somebody pours water on the ground. Consequence 1: The ground is not wet. Rule 2: The ground is wet when it rains. Consequence 2: The ground is wet. Rule 2 is much simpler than rule 1 and thus, given the facts, consequence 2 would be the logical one here. Usually, IQ tests have a definite answer with this in mind. Leaving out every two letters is a much simpler rule than polynomial fitting! In nature, simple rules are more likely than complex rules (see ockham's razor).

[@tashumalvey9895]

Your thumbnails are best!

[@borjadelarco6052]

1:43 That's a polynomial approximating the value of a function *f* (probably calculated via Lagrange's method or Newton's method) given a set of points extracted from the function: f(x0,y0) f x(1,y1) ... f(xn,yn) (n in this case is 10). This is simply interpolating a series of points. Since the points are equidistant (x0=-5, x1=-4, x2=-3, x3=-2, x4=-1, ..., x10=5) we can visualize the so-called Rugen phenomenon, which boils down to the fact that the polynomial of least degree that passes through all of those points oscillates in a pretty inaccurate way between them. To avoid this, the nodes should be spaced in such a way that they become "Chebyshev nodes". Another way to avoid this is by using Hermite interpolation, which consists in having a polynomial that has the same derivative as the function *f* we are trying to approximate in the nodes given. This would annul such deviations or the "noise". There are many other ways to solve that problem... Using splines would get the job done since they have null second derivatives in the nodes and that cancels the deviations for the same reason (not quite) as explained previously with Hermite interpolation. _Why am I even talking about this? Well, it turns out tomorrow I have an exam on numerical methods and the fact that I just understood what the cause triggering that noise in that function is just blows my mind._ P.S.: The "good predictor" shown at 1:34 is just the straight line that gets closest to all of the points given. Another way to put it is that that straight line is a function f(x)=a+b*x arising from selecting the coefficients _a_ and _b_ that minimize the quadratic error made when interpolating these points. This is calculated by the famous method of least squares.

[@CharmingGoat92]

word

[@ninadachrekar7215]

Your comment doesn't fit well with your username :/

[@ShigaruFR]

I read this all just to find a "lol idk what I'm saying"

[@dominiquefortin5345]

Your version shows a lot of creativity.

[@sudiptachandra4910]

6:15 The only problem is that you have to complete the test within 20 minutes.

[@briandavis9871]

:) Love the video. While I do believe that IQ tests have some validity, they definitely have a bias for, "How much can you think like the people who made the test?" rather than simply "How smart are you?" I My recorded IQ is quite high, but I tend to miss the "simple" questions because I usually assume that they're "trick questions," and I make them more complicated than they were intended to be. (Not more complicated than they ARE, just more complicated than the test-makers intended.)

[@lucasblanc1295]

I like when they rank the questions by order of difficulty so it tells me how probable certain patterns are. Sometimes I can't believe that they are just shifting a value, or you can look at diagonals and see completions.

[@rafaelanschau3196]

I love your video. I have also wondered about the difference between finding the expected regularity that would yield the expected answer through extrapolation on one hand, and imagining("or overfitting as you say") a regularity that may justifiy any answer we want on the other... I guess we just have to accept that the regularities expected by IQ tests fall into some basic categories(rotations, increasing distance between elements and so forth) and work with these. But its fun to know that we can find regularities that would yield answers judged wrong by test takers because they can't see them.

[@azias7281]

"Number C" she says. I'm feeling smarter already.

[@vinodsaw5377]

Your voice calms me every time

[@harshsuman607]

Go back home! Boy. Don't try to cross your boundaries.

[@vinodsaw5377]

@@harshsuman607 hey I m a student of maths I know the importance of limit and I think I always be in my limit

[@MichaelMarteens]

When she fixed her glasses at the beginning of the video, it killed me! Less than two seconds into the video, not a word spoken, and getting laughs outta people.

[@wasg1019]

im a high school student in Denmark and my father who went to school (in old Iran, in king Shah time) learned about cotangent in trigonometri. This seem to have been forgotten in modern math, atleast in country I live in. Please make a video covering this part of trigonometri for high school level, thnx. Good videos btw. Keep up the good work :)

[@retrofrontier86]

She has one of the most soothing, gentle and relaxing voices I've ever heard. Her thoughts and examinations on mathematics are intriguing and always interesting but half the time I watch these videos just for the ASMR quality. Lol

[@ffggddss]

Kudos for using the Max Headroom effect at 1m 06s ! Bonus points: Does anyone here remember Max Headroom? Fred

[@muzyshayk8006]

She is so gentle as a 🌹 petal, too soft for this cruel world :( But again, more power to her.

[@RedSarGaming]

Kind of creepy, but ok man.

[@harshshitole6293]

How much distortion you want? Tibees:-Yes

[@TheAdvancedMusic]

Toby trolling Mensa. Subscribed!

[@Ali-Mutahir]

My logic for the 2nd question.. 1,3,6,10 The gap between 1 and 3 is 2 and the first number is added to the gap so it become 2+1=3..and then this(2+1)= 3 is added to the next number so 3+2+1 become 6... And then again the gap between 3 and 6 is 3 and 1(the first number) is again added to it and it becomes 6+3+1=10...so the next number would be the gap between 6 and 10 and then 1 would be added to it.. The gap is 4 and 1 will be added so its 15

[@srinathshettigar379]

if there is a test designed to measure "Dumbness Quotient"(DQ) then same high IQ person will also score the highest in this DQ test. FACT.

[@swapnilshrivastava6889]

When you got 160 degrees for the last question, it almost had me saying "option ही नहीं है । "😂, which roughly translates to "that's not even an option". Anyways I think it's true that no single viewpoint should get precedence over the other on these tests because even with the correct reasoning, your answer might differ.

[@BillPalmer]

Swapnil Shrivastava For the square plus she applied the math tomthat diagram Then for the circle square, she applied that diagram’s math to the next one. WTF? Though in each case the smaller object moves 90° from the previous ones’s trajectory Plus:90° Square 180° So I would think the dot would move at 270°. Which matches the answer code. How she came up with the somewhat arbitrary squaring x 10 method is crazy. And her answer didn’t even match one of the choices, which should tell you she went down the wrong rabbit hole

[@deodatlawson8877]

Me looking at the 1st question thinking that it’s actually not too bad @6:00 Tibees: I’m about to end this person’s whole career

[@tmayne220]

"I have watched a few episodes of rick and morty before i filmed this video so i should be fine" LOL now im not sure if you have been taking the piss...

[@princeraj3975]

A higher IQ is a waste if it make things complicated rather than simplifying

[@BillMSmith]

I shall be referencing this video in my up coming book "Mensa for Dummies".

[@kickboxing3728]

I couldn’t help but laugh at you fitting a polynomial for those points

[@michaelcampbell9180]

People, please stop associating IQ or intelligence in general with 'knowledge'. IQ tests determine how quickly (or the capacity to do so)one can learn or grasp concepts. It does not determine whether a person can or cannot. There are plenty of 'idiots' out there with high IQ's due to the fact that they never applied themselves. Now I had a student with an IQ of 60 and it took them 4 years to learn basic algebra. That student knew as much as a fellow student with an IQ of 100 that it only took them 1 year to learn. It isn't ability or knowledge, those are aptitude tests not IQ tests. People trying to make themselves equal to others in this field is just foolish. Be happy with your own unique challenges as people with high IQ's deal with their own unique challenges themselves. If you are in denial in how they work, I have had a number of them administered to myself and all of the results equaled the same value with a similar margin of error. I believe they are quite accurate due to my personal experience, outside of the numerous other studies and evaluations placed on them.

[@balasujithpotineni8184]

I agree with you on a large case but the ability to solve a problem or to grasp things quickly arrives from the knowledge, application techniques and mainly imaginative skills of the problem. The person with the above 3 can solve the given problem quickly. But these are dependent on all the activities they are involved since their birth.

[@michaelcampbell9180]

@@balasujithpotineni8184 it actually isn't knowledge. They have non verbal IQ tests to remove as much bias as possible. They still obtain the same results as normal IQ tests. You mention techniques, but these are things people develop on their own to obtain knowledge in general(hence IQ tries to show their ability to learn quickly). Techniques generally only help with memorization and that is again trying to make reference to knowledge and not IQ. That is why a 5 year old taking the test will score the same as when they are 35 taking the test. If what you are leaning towards is true, age would play the largest factor in all of this and it is ruled out. People dont score higher on IQ tests over time. That is left for aptitude tests. Unless you are given the answers before hand, you will get an accurate understanding of how quickly you can grasp concepts, not how much you know.

[@michaelcampbell9180]

@@balasujithpotineni8184 you are delving out what the misconceptions are though. We tend to associate the test with how much one can know, but it isn't. Just like how they debunked good chess players as being brilliant. There is actually no correlation to IQ and skill. People with higher IQs tend to gravitate towards the game, but your ability in it has no correlation with a high IQ. Sorry the analogy is becoming a tangent now.

[@zorro2757]

In my Opinion, intelligence means: Be curious, somone who wants to learn and asks questions isnt stupid. Be able to solve complex problems and last is to know what you can and what you can not do. Know your limits and be selfaware.

[@diti-ey1qn]

Using Lagrange Interpolation Polynomial, for the first question you get the following polynomail: y=f(x)= 3x - 2 .... f(1) = 1, f(2) = 4, f(3) = 7, f(4) = 10, f(5) = 13 = M

[@ninadachrekar7215]

What I learned from this video: a circle has one side

[@mustafahasan5878]

MENSA : Wait !! That's illegal !

[@lainard13]

Imagine if a student at a University Admissions Exam answered like this.

[@god1770]

Gets through the First question: "yeeesss, I've done it. Next question." *Looks up to see that everyone's completed the paper, and left.*

[@wesleychan7575]

30) The right graph should be a blocked out shade. Line 0 (programmatic counting) has 0 blocks. Line 1 has 1. There should be 2 block out shades in line 2. Sorry, graders, you are not allowed to see through it.

[@TheBurningBushHQ]

hi tibees..find answers for difficult questions in the most simple way is the fact behind intelligence, not complicating the thought process.