Antenna was always a mystery for me until I saw this fantastic series. Thanks. I was wondering if the 2-page handout is uploaded somewhere.
@MegawattKS Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Yes - it's the second pdf on this page: ecefiles.org/rf-circuits-course-section-11/ The full set of slides from the series is also available here, together with other series: ecefiles.org/ Glad it was helpful. Best wishes.
@DPELMohdSiddique8 ай бұрын
good lecture
@MegawattKS8 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@vaggelismadias74813 ай бұрын
Thank you Sir for this excellent work !
@MegawattKS3 ай бұрын
You're very welcome. Glad it was helpful !
@vaggelismadias74813 ай бұрын
@@MegawattKS Dear Sir would you please recommend some books for RF ? Preferably with solved examples. Once again thank you for your comprehensive work. 👍👍
@MegawattKS3 ай бұрын
@@vaggelismadias7481 Here is the book I recommended in the course that the Radio Design 101 series was adapted from. "RF Circuit Design, Second Edition, by Christopher Bowick, et.al.," Elsevier, 2008. It's a very popular RF design text - but I don't think it has solved examples. In our course, the assignments were subcircuit design problems. These took the place of traditional problem sets/homeworks. Student solutions were checked by building the circuit in the lab (physics checked their designs :-) ) and documenting it. I graded mainly if/how-well it worked, but also student understanding of the material demonstrated by required circuit design discussions turned in after each assignment was completed. It was a senior level course, so that worked well. We also have a grad-level course in Microwaves and Antennas which is where much of the material in this video series was adapted from, and the structure of that course was similar. Building, testing, and documenting took the place of classic homework problems. Here is a link to the RF design course materials (all lectures plus assignments/etc.) Unfortunately I don't have similar material on-line for the Antennas course - although there is a little on antennas among the circuit design course here (see section 11): ecefiles.org/rf-circuits-course-notes/
@MegawattKS3 ай бұрын
In the past, one couldn't really do the design/test/document method of learning without access to a significant university lab. Fortunately that changed about 4 years ago with the introduction of reasonably priced test equipment (NanoVNA and TinySA). Here is a link to a video series that talks about these devices: kzbin.info/aero/PL9Ox3wpnB0koBGofotI4xS8R0ct0FeYfv
@vaggelismadias74813 ай бұрын
@@MegawattKS thank you!
@ARUNKUMARBHATTACHARYYA5842 ай бұрын
Very good explanation.
@MegawattKS2 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@M0XYM2 жыл бұрын
Truely excellent. Thank you. I wondered if you spend 5mins on the characteristics of 'long' antennas (where l >> lamda) For instance, I have a doublet of about 130' (ish) fed with ladder line. What could I (theoretically) expect if I attempt to rx/tx with wavelengths of a foot or so?
@MegawattKS2 жыл бұрын
Thank you ! In free-space, antennas longer than lambda end up with somewhat (or very much) directional patterns. Hence, they have gain in particular directions and nulls in others. The patterns can be well controlled at high frequencies with careful design. See for example owenduffy.net/antenna/ccps/index.htm . But at HF (or otherwise when there are objects in the near-field (closer than lambda/2 for instance), those will influence/distort the pattern. Have you tried simulating your doublet installation with EZNEC ? EZNEC should be able to handle the antenna and ground - but it may not give completely accurate results if there are other things nearby. And it's a project in itself to learn all the features you'll need to use in the model, like the transmission line and ground definitions...
@MegawattKS2 жыл бұрын
On the last question, do you mean using the doublet at 915 MHz? My guess, without simulator verification, is that most of the radiation will take place in the initial part of the feedline and connection to the tuner since the wire separation is a decent fraction of lambda. I'm guessing there won't be much power that makes it to the feedpoint of the doublet elements.
@M0XYM2 жыл бұрын
@@MegawattKS Thank you for both replies. It's given me something to think about. Regarding the last question - actually I had 70cm and 2m in mind but your answer has shone a light! Thanks again.
@llwonder2 ай бұрын
Do you have any advice for wide band monopole design (5G cell related). Obtaining a 50 ohm impedance at all frequencies (617 MHz to 5GHz) is basically impossible. Loaded monopole would likely throw off the tune of all other frequencies. Any guidance would be appreciated.
@MegawattKS2 ай бұрын
The first thing I thought of is a discone antenna. There's one in Part 2 of this eposide (around 15 minutes in) designed for 25 MHz to 1300 MHz: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5epkJ15maeaiZo . Applying frequency scaling, this could be shrunk and moved to higher frequencies (and the whip and loading coil could likely be omitted since that might be harder to fabricate in smaller size and since 1300/25 > 5000/617). Doing a search on "5g discone antenna", I found this. moonrakeronline.com/us/aor-da-6000-compact-700-6000-mhz-discone-antenna (going to 617 MHz likely just means extending the cone slightly if needed).
@TheGameRRecon Жыл бұрын
Hello, this series is helping me out alot so far! Thanks. But I had a few questions. For context, I am doing a group design project for my degree, based on a future manned mission to Mars. I am handling the comms and telemetry. I am trying to size some antennas as this will help size the telemetry and computer systems but am finding it difficult to calculate these dimensions. I will be using a mix of X-band and Ka-band transponders, so with this I managed to get the respective wavelengths. But from this point onwards, I'm unsure on what antenna type to use, how to work out the gain, and other miscellaneous parts of the antennas. Could you give me any guidance with this? What steps to take when developing deep-space antennas? Any info would be of great help.
@MegawattKS Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear you found the Antenna Briefs series. I would recommend you look at Episode 3 which discusses link-budgets for free-space path-loss conditions. Episode 4 goes even further (literally ;-) - looking at what antenna sizes and data rates need to be used for talking to nearby star systems in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) :-) Hope that helps.
@TheGameRRecon Жыл бұрын
@@MegawattKS Brilliant, will take a look now. Thanks again.
@dominicestebanrice746010 ай бұрын
Is it just coincidental that if (as a thought-experiment/sketch-exercise) I take a plate capacitor, represented on a sheet of paper in the X-Y plane, with dimensions H x W x t (and imagining just air between the plates as the dielectric), and then 'move' the cable connectors to the edge of each plate, and then fold/straighten the entire thing out, I end up with the geometry of a dipole antenna, albeit one with a large Z-axis dimension? If I then 'trim' off most of the Z-axis material of the plate, it becomes essentially an antenna shape/configuration. Is a dipole antenna a form of capacitor in an AC circuit, just with the 'plates' (poles) not facing each other but facing outward in the same direction? It's KZbin.....dumb questions are OK, right?😘
@MegawattKS9 ай бұрын
Sorry for the late reply. Yes! Good observation. And no, it's not coincidental. Actually the first antennas by Hertz used balls at the end to increase capacitance. I assume this is because they had more confidence in having enough capacitance that way. But it's also the inductance of the rods that makes this work. The capacitance is associated with E field and also getting currents flowing as you said. And the currents induced in the rods by that capacitance work together with the capacitance to create and launch EM waves :-)
@darmayuda4157 Жыл бұрын
Pls explain with formula n explain to the point..
@MegawattKS Жыл бұрын
Please see the earlier episodes in the series for the physics and math. In particular, episode 6 shows full integral equations for finding the far-field patterns. I thought about including some rough empirical formulas for some of the designs covered in episode 8 on design, but there are too many antennas to fit all that into a single episode. Hopefully once an antenna type is decided on based on directivity and gain needed and other design criteria, one can do internet searches for formulas that give starting values for dimensions/etc. Then, a design should be refined using simulation as discussed in episodes 5 and 6. Here is a link to some of the physics and math from Episode 6. See Episode 5 for intro to Maxwell's equations that these equations are based on. Hope that helps. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jHe1enWqe9yDn6c