well, this suddenly appeared in my KZbin recommendation.. i sense something huge is coming, youtube gave a warning.
@MegaLangosta4 жыл бұрын
This disaster has been cooking since at least the 1970s.
@MegaLangosta4 жыл бұрын
@lil gucci The real question is, how long can they keep faking it? I'm so amazed and disgusted at how far it's gone, I've almost given up on trying to predict when.
@bobmar92394 жыл бұрын
This is a very old video. Does it even apply? And why does it show up now when are feeds? KZbin is messed up.
@gavva20104 жыл бұрын
I think you're right, & I don't think we're gna need to wait long to see it happen. By the end of June, by my calcs. Get your £$ off the markets, ppl.
@thedarkdragon14374 жыл бұрын
that moment when you get it during corona virus outbreak lol
@lichtundliebe9994 жыл бұрын
The "good" bank creates money from nothing and lends it to the client. This is called book money.
@dboy64004 жыл бұрын
@richard mccann Fractional Reserve Banking.
@InstTaxSolutionsLLC11 жыл бұрын
The shadow banking system has indeed become a significant part of the economy. Great job in explaining how this system works.
@shpensive4 жыл бұрын
Incorrect description of traditional banking: banks don't lend deposits, loans create deposits.
@arjaysmithjr90834 жыл бұрын
Does this guy really believe his own bullshit? I hope not. I think he's watched "It's a Wonderful Life" once too often. Turn off the TV!
@superchuck32594 жыл бұрын
Banks don't lend out their deposits. They lend out fractional reserve dollars based on 30-100 times what is on deposit. So the bank pays the deposit person on 1,000 @ 2% 20 bucks a year. But the bank can lend out up to 100,000 @ 4% thus making 4,000 bucks gross proceeds. This works great so long as the 100k is paid back without defaults. but say 3%, or 3,000 of the 100k defaults. This still leaves the bank 4000 - 3000 or 1000 net minus paying 20 in interest, so still making 980 profit. Yeah, this is just an example, but do you see the huge advantage banks have in printing/creating money!
@romusa92044 жыл бұрын
@@superchuck3259 you got it right
@brucesanborn74844 жыл бұрын
Where does the money come from for those" loans"?Deposits?
@superchuck32594 жыл бұрын
@@brucesanborn7484 Not really. Loans are based off of assets. So if you have a house, you can borrow cash against it. The money comes out of thin air, it is a right of a bank to create money thru fractional reserve lending. Could a bank loan money against stock assets, sure, it is called Margin lending. So the escrow account for your home is enough deposit to secure the entire loaned out money from the home.
@answersquestioned3 жыл бұрын
The moment you turned to the camera, after drawing hair on Bruce, I gathered it was a self-portrait. And thank you for the clear explanation, mr. Hirsch
@trellend14 жыл бұрын
He's not completely correct here, when you get a loan, the money (check book) is created from thin air, just an accounting entry. The banks do not loan customers deposits, although they use the deposits to meet the reserve requirements, how ever low those may be. I'm not sure about the shadow banking side and the origination of money from them, but with banks, it isn't what it seems.
@vajliakduke62313 жыл бұрын
On the credit creation, yes, i think you're right. About shadow bank, i think his simplified explanation is good.
@Acid313372 жыл бұрын
How did you know that back then? Even now there is not many sources of information that describe credit creation right
@jonswanson77662 жыл бұрын
It seems that banks don't lend, rather they purchase securities, the loan contract is a security with the signature and your obligation to pay. These are often sold off and bundled into MBS
@cia181915 жыл бұрын
You're great, man. Very concise and clear. These are things that aren't taught to the laypeople and being on myself, i appreciate the level in which you've presented these seemingly complex ideas.
@hardwaybets4 жыл бұрын
Your way of explaining these concepts is exceptionally good! I have enjoyed several of your videos...
@MrSupernova11110 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation of the traditional bank versus the shadow banking system. Thank you!
@EvanderSmart9 жыл бұрын
2:30 Would definitely be more accurate and educational to explain how the bank (only one way) makes money by including how Fractional Reserve Banking works. In effect, the money Bruce deposited is kept at the bank, but the bank can then make 9X that amount on their books to loan out to other, at 10%. And the interest rate they lend out is 1% or less. So assume they make 9% nine times, if they made the same loan amounts/terms in the future.
@scottdavidson75435 жыл бұрын
Modern money mechanics
@BYENZER4 жыл бұрын
9X?? NO. Currently 43X is the NORM.
@abc-mn1yi9 жыл бұрын
Hey Paddy, love these videos - What determines whether a bank is a regulated bank or a shadow bank and why aren't shadow banks regulated with safety nets etc?
@Rays_Bad_Decisions Жыл бұрын
The safety net is a government bail out and financial reserve requirements. Most banks don't follow those anyways. That's why they need to be bailed out. He also makes no mention of fractional reserve lending...
@Smokingb0b10 жыл бұрын
Sorry Paddy, you know quite well the bank in this case creates the money out of thin air, NOT using deposit money.
@se7ensnakes4 жыл бұрын
You are not exactly right. Banks tender promissory notes that people sign. So if there is no one signing promissory note there is no new money created. When a promissory note is paid off the money supply contracts. There is no fractional reserve lending. There is no mulitiplicity effect. Banks are just using signed promissory notes as cash because people do not know the worth
@daustin144414 жыл бұрын
I thought that was an interesting omission too🤔
@kangal199915 жыл бұрын
beltane3, I worked for a major Bank, we could not book both principal & int pmt as income. Audit will fail us. Principal was booked as assets. Interest, late charge fee, NSF fee etc were booked as income. This was true for GL. Even for the regulatory SALT reporting we had book Principal under asset. I know where u are pointing to, the bear stearns, Merrils, Lehmans of the world did leverage based on future interest receipts. When that stopped due to housing market collapse they collapsed.
@Arginine8815 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the free education, I never heard the whole process that way.
@shonsimpkins39154 жыл бұрын
Two questions: Are shadow banks allowed to lend using fractional reserve like regular banks? Is this a result of dismantling Glass - Steagall protections for the regulation and prohibitions on speculative investing in banking?
@percobalano3946 жыл бұрын
Thank u. this helps me with my report next week!
@Chhaylin15 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for the explanation. You really made my day. I have even less confidence in the economic revival now.
@GRYL1805 жыл бұрын
"People have to borrow money to buy things" That's the problem right there because a debt based economy cannot sustain itself for very long.
@kentheengineer592 Жыл бұрын
Liquidity Transformation
@SloMoShort4 жыл бұрын
The 20 year old student driving a new Audi on a lease and paying for it on a weekend job is the signal something is about to go plop.
@waikikiman0075 жыл бұрын
I have watch a few of your videos so far and they have been pretty good. But this one is totally misleading and inaccurate. Firstly Commercial banks do not lend savers money ( as u referred it to the "traditional way") they do not act as intermediaries. They lend money that is created out of thin air by a process called double entry book keeping. Shadow Banks do lend money the "traditional way" but they can also create it. They can then Securitize these loan agreements and resell them. But commercial banks also can sell their loan contracts to investment banks who do exactly the same thing. This is what lead to the 2007 financial crises whereby, primarily, Mortgages were sold to investment banks that then Securitize them and sold them on to 'investors'
@franciscoferreiracarmo43975 жыл бұрын
Yes... this is the point that is "missing" in your prentation....
@franciscoferreiracarmo43975 жыл бұрын
Yes... this is the point that is "missing" in your prentation....
@noseltda46854 жыл бұрын
Shadow banking ia what traditional banking should be..banking propaganda video
@Well_I_am_just_saying4 жыл бұрын
They do not lend money out of thin air. And you do not understand the concept of double-entry bookkeeping (accounting).
@onetwothree41484 жыл бұрын
@@Well_I_am_just_saying how is the fed money not created out of thin air?
@tomshultz78324 жыл бұрын
That's not exactly how Banks work. They don't only lend money that customers have deposited, they also create money out of thin air.
@VasQuezadilla12 жыл бұрын
@tavit8 money creation in that article is in the sense of money supply, which is controlled by the Fed in two ways: money printing and reserve requirements. This is how the money supply is manipulated. Just to emphasize: this is controlled by the Fed, NOT commercial banks.
@rigoletto6813 жыл бұрын
House prices will continue to fall for years. I read in June, 2011 the FHA was still giving almost zero down loans ...at the same time millions of people are not paying their mortgages anymore since banks are not foreclosing. There is no end in sight to real estates free fall at this point until the system starts to correct and that has barely begun. Paddy should have a weekly PBS show. People would definitely watch it.
@23drcharles4 күн бұрын
The new book The Bubble That Broke The Bank, 2024, gives an excellent example on the Siamese twins of banking and real estate creates an unholy alliance leading to the real estate crash in 2026.
@nickcollins75684 жыл бұрын
You have completely missed the process of explaining fractional reserve banking where the banks lend out currency that doesn't really exist which the banks create out of thin air and then charge interest on. Nice little earner on something that doesn't really exist!!!
@FrostyAUT4 жыл бұрын
You don't really understand how money works, do you?
@katczinsky4 жыл бұрын
@@FrostyAUT hes right actually When loans get paid back, this destroys that new money. The thing is that they can create loans out of loans
@GSD-4 жыл бұрын
FrostyAUT Yeah he does. And if you think otherwise, comment something more substantive
@earlpierce25864 жыл бұрын
@@FrostyAUT actually money is created when people make loans.. it's not borrowed from someone's saving. The Bank of England has confirmed this, as well as many economic experts.
@FrostyAUT3 жыл бұрын
@@earlpierce2586 Alan Greenspan said, shortly before the great financial crisis, that they had "figured out" economics because there was no sign of a crash. In my eyes, the Bank of England is just as "trustworthy". Also explain to me what keeps banks from simply lending INFINITE sums of money to anyone who needs it? I'll tell you what. There's such a thing as Basel 3 capital requirements.
@raphael525 жыл бұрын
Just found your videos. Excellent presentation. Excellent explanation. Definitely subscribed and liked.
@MrWashraf5 жыл бұрын
Regular banking system also do securitieze their loans.
@oleg65175 жыл бұрын
Yes, and that is the reason why i could find and see how the speaker of the video is trying to manipulate. He is a bad gue.
@superchuck32594 жыл бұрын
@@oleg6517 Yep, banks do fractional lending, they are not just making 8%. They are lending tons of money they don't have and collecting interest on it!
@Kangroo114 жыл бұрын
amazing and very informative and ditto happening in INDIA.
@aspectoflife5 ай бұрын
very conceptual by the examples,thanks
@Rays_Bad_Decisions Жыл бұрын
Because of fractional reserve banking at 1-10 that 8% is actually an 80% profit because it give out ten loans. Or more likey 1-30 is how your banks reserves are actually spread so it's like a 240% profit from every dollar deposited...
@mikki75225 жыл бұрын
Great explanation, and very good game theory analysis :)
@326sailingships4 жыл бұрын
You forgot all about Bruce. Regardless of which bank or financial institution he has he still must fulfill his contract. Bruce doesn't care about any institution's financial difficulties once he has a contract. Bruce's only obligation is to pay what he contractually owes.
@farogatolimjonova95663 жыл бұрын
very well-explained (much better than confusing textbooks)
@rexdeodium11 жыл бұрын
That is a common misunderstanding. The way that they "create" money, is by lending it to someone, while the depositor still regards that money as his own.
@jacobblair69414 жыл бұрын
This man was so ahead of his time
@nfpk15 жыл бұрын
Posting these videos is a great idea. I'm really interested in these possible solutions and theories brought forward and love to keep updated. Marketplace definitely provides that for me. Thanks!
@franciscoferreiracarmo43975 жыл бұрын
Excuse me Sir.... but there is a point that is missing in your presentation... banks leverage the deposits to make them become loans. In Brazil this leverage is around 11:1. I don't know how much it is in the US right now, but before the 2008 crisis I believe it was around 33:1!!!! So let's just pick 10:1 as a reasonable number.... If you pay 2% for a deposit but multiply this money 10 times and them land it to people at 10%, your spread is 98%. No surprise pension funds and other investors go to the "shadow", being this dark the light. Please correct me if I am wrong. By no way I am against banks. I just believe it is extremely healthy for the economy that they have an strong competition.
@vincenttheo88415 жыл бұрын
You actually have the causality wrong. Banks first make loans and then find sufficient deposits (i.e. reserves) by either attracting more deposits from the public or borrowing from the Fed or from other banks. This is precisely why it is difficult for the Fed to target a money supply level and the reason the Fed has given up targeting money supply since the 80s.
@franciscoferreiracarmo43975 жыл бұрын
@@vincenttheo8841 Thanks. I will have to study the subject deeper. The little I know is about the Brazilian law, here you need to have the deposits to start a bank and the loans.
@mattiassedin97693 жыл бұрын
I would recomend a search on Prof Richard Werner and Prof Steve Keen on this subject.
@VasQuezadilla12 жыл бұрын
@tavit8 thats lowering the reserve ratio. Money already deposited that used to be kept in reserve is now free to lend. They do not make money out of thin air... However, the Fed prints money, but banks still have to pay an interest rate to borrow from the Fed...
@TheJimmyKrazy14 жыл бұрын
Paddy for president!
@beltane315 жыл бұрын
How can you book principal as an addition to assets without considering those payments 'income'? When a loan is created, a negotiable instrument is created,an asset, out of thin air. My point is the principal payments received,regardless of accounting gimicks, are really income to the banks. They are in receipt of money they really never had before.That is income. Audit would fail you because this is supposed to be hidden. I assume prinicpal payments are used to offset the recorded loan balance.
@hamwong433310 жыл бұрын
Shadow banking is what caused the outburst of financial crisis in 2008 when people bought lots of seemingly low risk bonds but actually those of highly risky.
@TomekSamcik6910 жыл бұрын
I was about to write this
@syngensmythe110 жыл бұрын
yeah but wasn't it the banks themselves that securitised the loans?
@kipponi7 жыл бұрын
Wrong, wrong, wrong like Trump says.
@pelumiobasa31046 жыл бұрын
No the shadow banks did not cause the financial crisis in not even the regular banks are solely to blame for the crisis. It was poor monetary policy and fanny Mae and Freddy mac that were the real causes of the crisis
@maxxxstrong45776 жыл бұрын
Failed Trolls Nailed it.
@JohnKyleSutton3 жыл бұрын
This was a great explanation! Thank you so much 🙏
@TheBarrwen5 жыл бұрын
When you call government regulation a saftey net its misleading. The money the government gives to the bank is taxed off others. It should never come to that. Regulators should have stiff penalties that discourage predatory banking but it doesn't. Even after 08.
@wmc97224 жыл бұрын
There are BANKS and then there are NON-BANKS that are in the business of lending money. Becoming a BANK, getting a charter to be able to become a US BANK, is a really big deal. It's an area of business that is highly regulated and also it is a privilege to get (or buy into getting) a charter. There are many regulations that go along with being a US BANK and there are many benefits as well. BANKS operate in the world of Modern Money Mechanics. Do a search and you will find a lot out there to describe the basic process of money creation in a fractional reserve banking system. Bank Reserves and Deposit Expansion are important parts of what we think of as regular banks, those places you go to make a deposit and to get money out of their ATM. "Modern Money Mechanics" was a booklet published and distributed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, originally written by Dorothy M. Nichols in May 1961. Described as a "workbook on bank reserves and deposit expansion", the text offers a detailed description of the basic process of money creation in a fractional reserve banking system. The approach taken illustrates the changes in bank balance sheets that occur when deposits in banks change as a result of monetary action by the Federal Reserve System. The publication originally was written by Dorothy M. Nichols in May 1961. Recently (in 2019) one person decided to increase his cash position and went to a bank where he has a solid history and borrowed $250,000.00 at 3.5% interest. This same amount of money was offered from a 'non-bank bank for 9% interest, sufice to say, much more expensive. That said, NON-BANKS serve society overall as they are structured differently. They can take more risks hence they can lend money to a larger number of people than can traditional banks. NON-BANKS do not take deposits in the same manner that regular banks do. Non-Banks often have investors who are promised a 'return on' their money. Many people who cannot get a loan at a traditional bank WILL BE APPROVED for the same loan at a NON-BANK BANK and the cost of the loan will likely be more. Different standards, different rates. NON-BANK BANKS, also referred to as SHADOW BANKS, do not get to create money through the fractional reserve system. Typically the term 'bank' is not to be used by non-banks, those who operate in the 'shadow'. This review is very rough and I learned more about the entire subject in writing it. Please look at more of what Paddy has and also look at Investopedia. These are great sources for all of us as we navigate our way forward.
@hammer-fn7gm4 жыл бұрын
Some people seem to think that the banks create money. This is over simplified. The only money the bank makes is on the interest over time. When you take out a loan for a car, the money you borrower goes to the person or business you bought the car from. The bank no longer has that money unless the person or business re deposits it back in the same bank. If they do, the bank can lend it out again, but they will only make money on the interest over time.
@tavit812 жыл бұрын
@SnappyTertle fractional reserve banking means that for every dollar of deposits the banks only have to hold a certain portion in reserves. If I deposit $10 at a bank and they are obligated to keep 10% as reserves, they can lend out $9 to you by simply crediting your account. That $9 was created out of thin air and if we both went to the bank to withdraw the $19 ($10 real money + $9 new money)... it wouldn't be there because it doesn't exist...
@matteomasini70733 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video , you are an incredibile professor, your way to explain the shadow economy was pretty clear 😁
@MrSupernova11113 жыл бұрын
Great video! Some people don't understand shadow banks are not depository banks so they are not regulated the same way as banks - hence shadow bank. According to wikipedia the assets of these shadow banks in 2007 was $4 trillion and the depository banks was $6 trillion. Hopefully with the new regulation and accounting rules this mess can be prevented in the future.
@nahomebekele74803 жыл бұрын
I just watched the big short summarized in 10min
@tavit812 жыл бұрын
@SnappyTertle no. you're just wrong. go read the article on 'money creation' on wikipedia... it's very simple: 1) money creation by the central bank and 2) money creation through the fractional reserve system.
@VasQuezadilla12 жыл бұрын
@tavit8 the reserve ratio is not a means of money creation...it is simply used to limit the amount of money that can be lent out. A bank's purpose is to serve as an intermediary for people that want to deposit (save/lend) money and people who want to borrow money. It uses the money from deposits to fund people that want to borrow. Interest rates are used to "pay" for the service of providing liquidity. Banks (other than the Fed) do not create money, just provide liquidity.
@Mike92019843 жыл бұрын
This video could be classified as part of the “horror” genre.
@benjaminbailey63834 жыл бұрын
Great video.... Quick and easy explanation video.....
@MrWashraf4 жыл бұрын
Traditional banks are also do securitization.
@kdcruz7511 жыл бұрын
the bank places the mortgage instrumentincl. promissory note,on the asset side,as a debit entry) does it not have to create a credit entry AS PER DOUBLE ENTRY ACCOUNTING..does the FED then underwrite this (ie the bank pays the premium of 0.10%) so that the bank can now write a cheque on that liability entry to the buyer of the 'loan' ie EXTENSION of credit ( banks doc dont mention the word loan)like a check one writes from a deposit as the authorised signature , shifting laibilty to another bank
@rigoletto6813 жыл бұрын
House prices will continue to fall for years. I read in June, 2011 the FHA was still giving almost zero down loans ...at the same time millions of people are not paying their mortgages anymore since banks are not foreclosing. There is no end in sight to real estates free fall at this point until the system starts to correct and that has barely begun.
@MirageScience14 жыл бұрын
man your videos explain alot but the most important thing is that our money represents debt and the fed creates all the money which they lend out at interest which can only be payed back by other money they lent out at interest.
@VasQuezadilla12 жыл бұрын
@tavit8 true...but you are forgetting interest rates...that is how I would "pay" for my $9. If it got to the point where people were withdrawing more than the bank had to give out, interest rates would fluctuate (supply and demand) to prevent this. In the case where this were to happen (bank runs out of cash), the bank borrows money from the Fed (banks cannot print money), paying interest to the Fed.
@ull8934 жыл бұрын
May be I am wrong on this assumption, I think the very reason shadow banking came up, because traditional banks does not give any significant interest on deposits. Thereby, people looking for other places to invest their money. Correct me if I am wrong. Please be gentle with words, peace. Thank you.
@tavit812 жыл бұрын
@SnappyTertle the fed regulates the banks by changing the reserve requirements, yes, but the banks are the ones who decide to lend and when you lend without backing that money with 100% of reserves you are creating money.
@elpresidio15 жыл бұрын
With shadow banks like Nationwide, why can't they be more like regular banks where customers can open accounts and the banks can loan that money to borrowers in addition to the bond system?
@ransielgalme80974 жыл бұрын
........excellent presentation.......thank you
@LouFromShelbyMI10 жыл бұрын
Read Micheal Lewis' "The Big Short" that does not use the term shadow bank but does describe the same process and the larger debacle that resulted from the allowed deregulation and lack of oversight from the SEC
@TheBarrwen5 жыл бұрын
Maybe no saftey net would act as an incentive to not screw up.
@Tweetogreggieb592 жыл бұрын
2 thumbs up good and reliable content From this host consistently videos recommended.
@tavit812 жыл бұрын
@SnappyTertle yes. it's called fractional reserve banking, go look it up.
@suryarout82255 жыл бұрын
thanks.. Marketplace APM...So informative.
@shyi12424 жыл бұрын
Terrific demonstration!
@lawrence.centinalesАй бұрын
i will definitely hire you in the future
@rnunezc.45755 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation, thanks
@worldfamous260dewitt6 ай бұрын
Well explained.
@naimulhaq96265 жыл бұрын
In other words print money and give it a fancy name and shift the burden on to the people.
@pepelemoko015 жыл бұрын
It's like the big wheel at the casino (the one with worst odds)round and round it goes where it stops nobody knows.
@naimulhaq96265 жыл бұрын
@@pepelemoko01 No one needs to know, it stops somewhere, the odds are the people will have to bear the brunt.
@jasonjanes32564 жыл бұрын
YES SIR! - Punish the person who believes money is real - Most people forget money was invented, created - It's not fundamental to how you should feel
@philpaule472 Жыл бұрын
Really like the videos. Very informative
@helgenome7 жыл бұрын
The presenter does not understand how banking works: Banks do not lend out depositors' money. They create new credit money when issuing loans.
@kipponi6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it is created when you write your signature to a loan paper. It is not exist before anywhere ? So basically Money for nothing like Dire Strait's song.
@tbayley66 жыл бұрын
No, not for nothing. The loan creates a deposit, which the borrower then transfers to the seller of the house. It can then cancel part of the seller's debt (which destroys the money), or it becomes part of the seller's savings. This is how savings enter the world!
@vidfreak565 жыл бұрын
Not sure hes saying banks do lend out depositors money. Where did he say thsi?
@loaizar955 жыл бұрын
I think that he is only simplifying it as it is really not relevant to explain what shadow banking is
@TrevKen5 жыл бұрын
Both things are true, loans temporarily create new money up to the amount they can leverage against their savings (fractional reserve)... BUT the interest needs to come from somewhere else. So the new money only exists until it's paid off. But obviously all the loans throughout history that defaulted and were never repaid is money that exists in the system still. And that needs to happen - stupidly. Because the money supply *does* need to increase as populations/prosperity/resources are created!
@rdalbis574 жыл бұрын
What laws are under Shadow Banks?
@Bosniake11 жыл бұрын
Shadow baning has no safty net? Great! Thats the way banking should be!
@nillejoslin4 жыл бұрын
Like Hong Kong and Liechtenstein where the government cannot rescue banks. Therefore they are more conservative and solid.
@tempusfugit36353 жыл бұрын
There’s an interesting set of arguments for free banking, but as a matter of sociological fact, people tend to not like losing all their money in runs. In the end, they’ll trade some freedom and price discovery for security and deposit insurance.
@nathanrobinson10995 жыл бұрын
My issue with this, is that the banks can just create liquidity out of thin air...they don’t need safety net anything. The non-banking lenders absolutely need the net.
@jjtopp9912 жыл бұрын
@tavit8 Yes, it is called Fractional Reserve Lending. Typically required "reserves" (savings deposits, etc) are around 3% (during "normal" times). Think about that. In essence, it means the banking system generates one helluva lot of inflation via their loan creation system. But I sense you already know all this tavit. This is more for those not "in the know".
@android129214 жыл бұрын
As a response to the last statement, why can't governments get the banks to rejuvenate businesses instead of relying on shadow banking system with no safety net to do that?
@davidalen92795 жыл бұрын
clear explanation. thank you.
@CandyPinkcake4 жыл бұрын
Bruce looks great for a stick figure
@Fsp015 жыл бұрын
great lesson. thanks
@Dewdaahman12 жыл бұрын
when I asked mortgage "servicers" where the money came from for me to borrow to buy my house and they were always referred to as "investors.."
@mikem.67655 жыл бұрын
Thankyou for posting this information
@zofe4 жыл бұрын
Repossessions are the key!
@walid78855 жыл бұрын
Shadow banking is something else.
@wghost111 ай бұрын
Very interesting indeed
@leos80194 жыл бұрын
Ahhh, good old financial fuckery. Thanks for reminding me how much I miss the Glass-Steagall Act and other vulture-repelling monetary policies!
@VasQuezadilla12 жыл бұрын
@tavit8 I understand what fractional reserve banking is. My frustration is that you are misunderstanding its use and claiming that banks are therefore evil because of it. The banking system is not inherently evil. It is easy to just blame one party for being evil, but there are so many factors that go into banking...the bank is not the only party that "wins" while everyone else is at a loss...
@topper3200 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't seem possible that Americans would accept this deliberate sharing of losses and not of gains with the shadow banking system.
@su1eman2824 жыл бұрын
Why doesn’t the traditional bank just match the interest rate the shadow banks are offering? Then Bruce would not have to resort to the shadow bank (which seems like they are essentially lending out money they don’t actually have)
@elro58994 жыл бұрын
the opposite is true:banks dont loan their depositors money,it only the collateral. they loan new money thats why there is inflation. shadow banking loans money they have - their money and they swap it for their investors money.
@hsiewayn15 жыл бұрын
good video, hope that more people can watch it
@marlonmoore50005 жыл бұрын
Yeah man you just completely left out the fractional reserve portion of banking. How 🤷🏿♂️?
@davidalen92795 жыл бұрын
excellent. thank you sir.
@pjdelucala5 жыл бұрын
Yes, shadow banks are not regulated and have done harmful things. The point this man is missing is that all banking is unregulated. Banks should not have the ability to control the money supply but they do. All banks have the ability to increase the money supply through Fractional Reserve Banking loans. The Fed also can increase the money supply as well to support all banks. All the major banks were involved with leverage and derivatives up until the 2008 financial crisis. In 2008, the rating agencies were paid off not by the shadow banks but by the big banks that were selling bad CDOs to unsuspecting people. They all were greedy. The "Volker Rule" in the Dodd/Frank bill has been basically ignored by the big banks.
@soulmate8055 жыл бұрын
Will shadow banking still exist now that we are heading into negative interest rate territory.
@nathanrobinson10995 жыл бұрын
Absolutely but not forever.
@kirra91524 жыл бұрын
As long as people still needs money and lacking any other way to fullfill their needs it will always exist in many form. But of course it will be operate with schemes that's being adjusted to the situation.
@drattler19463 жыл бұрын
Change Regulation of normal BANKS do not allow them to play the Market etc.
@DarinHibbs14 жыл бұрын
No mention of who owns the Federal Reserve Bank...disappointing.
@chester25814 жыл бұрын
Top content sir !
@elro58994 жыл бұрын
banks dont loan their depositors money,it only the collateral. they loan new money thats why there is inflation. its bad content pretends to be good.