Apple Vision Pro 2025 & Beyond: What Apple Needs To Do!

The Apple Vision Pro is almost one year old! It does some incredible things but it needs to do more in 2025. Here's what Apple needs to do with the Apple Vision Pro in 2025 and beyond to gain broader success with the AVP and even more!
Thanks for watching! You can support my independent content at / briantong
LET'S BE FRIENDS!
/ briantong
/ nostratongus
/ briantongtech
#apple #applevisionpro #2025

[@RONderluck]

I’ve used my Vision Pro every day since launch and I love it

[@vrgirl4454]

Like me, I love my avp, and recently discovered a new app [noc nok] to watch 3D online videos, which is simply amazing

[@vrgirl4454]

I love my avp and recently discovered a new app for watching 3D online videos that is simply awesome. 【NOC NOK】 App.

[@vrgirl4454]

NOC NOK app, dude, one of the great apps on avp, don't thank me.

[@riiddisbuk2496]

You know damn well the one reaosn why I don't have it ;P

[@RONderluck]

@ What’s thats reason??

[@dj_all_day_66]

Absolutely love mine. Yes I wish there was more content right now but that hasn't diminished how I feel about the product.

[@walkerdarin2003]

Drop the weight, price, remove everything bloating the cost (front screen is cute but not needed).

[@Gatitasecsii]

Front screen is an absolute waste

[@Aggie4life77]

Bingo! That front screen was then overthinking it lol!

[@eastonbrewer1798]

@@Aggie4life77I think that because it’s Apple Vision Pro it’s always going to have the front screen. But, when they start making other apple vision devices the front screen can and should be absent.

[@techinrl9869]

@@walkerdarin2003 To do that would end up eliminating most of the groundbreaking features. Apple intended this as a proof of concept, not a finished product. You can’t do a proof of concept when you have to eliminate most of your feature set. They didn’t intend for people to buy this. They wanted to find out what was possible with as many features as they could think of, keep what works and improve upon them and get rid of what didn’t. Perhaps in five years or so, maybe longer, we’ll have a good consumer product once the technology exists to do it. It’ll be smaller, lighter, and cheaper and won’t be a proof of concept anymore because the features would have been vetted by the public.

[@TheGreatWave4]

You just summarized every KZbinr’s explanation of what cha he’s are needed… in 4 seconds

[@camerastooge]

I wish we could see what Apple's long-term road map is for the Vision line. Surely they're looking down the road to something like smart glasses.

[@eastonbrewer1798]

Well, we’ve never seen there road map for any other product so I guess we just have to wait and see

[@techinrl9869]

People are looking at this product the wrong way. It is NOT a final product. It is a proof of concept. When you do that, you cannot fully explore a feature set and keep it cheap enough for mass market. A headset is also not the final product, and Apple knows that. That’s why they didn’t bother making it affordable since the cost of materials alone without any profit margin would still be too high for most people to buy. Apple’s goal is to flesh out the feature set on what works and what doesn’t and iterate into a final product over time. For some reason, people are expecting a mass market product this revolutionary right out of the gate. The tech simply isn’t there for that. It might not even be there in five years, but it will be a lot closer to Apple’s end goal of having a product completely replace a Mac, iPhone, and iPad with a single product.

[@alex_of_the_Mi_ag_gi]

@@techinrl9869 Agree with your thoughts, however, I don’t think there is a world where apple wants to replace the Mac, ipad and iPhone - compliment yes but I can’t believe Apple have a product plan anywhere that says ‘by year XXXX we will kill the iPhone’ - its their no 1 seller and their vision is probably more along the lines of ‘glass’ ‘foldable’ or ‘hologram’ iPhone. The ‘gap’ they are trying to fill is the TV monitor space which is largely left to the big electronics manufacturers. Imagine the production and logistical costs of creating huge TVs and projectors versus the relative ease of these headsets. I believe it is the likes of Sony, Samsung, LG et al.. that apple are looking to take on with this, hence the ‘Vision’ branding. This proof of concept actually does a great job of replacing the need for TVs, projector screens and monitors - it really works once you are ‘inside’ - but there are just too many flaws in the current model for it to be taken seriously by the general public as yet. I used the Anna pro head strap and removed the light seal from mine and it felt more like a pair of glasses and an overlay for my eyes and that made it more obvious to me that they aren’t far away from making these really usable as general device.

[@LucyMAGNER]

I love my Vision Pro

[@vrgirl4454]

I love my avp and recently discovered a new app for watching 3D online videos that is simply awesome. 【NOC NOK】 App.

[@vrgirl4454]

I love my avp, it's normal that some people just don't like AVP, just like some people don't like iPhone, I like avp because I can use it to watch movies, and apps like NOC NOK that can watch 3D videos are also one of my favorites.

[@chbald60]

I love mine!❤

[@elementneon]

I think you're spot on with that price point. It puts it into realm/purchasing mind-space of a high end TV or Laptop. As it stands it is just far too high a percentage of the average person's annual income to be a decision most would feel comfortable making. Especially knowing how often Apple tries to push consumers into the next hype cycle of purchasing. Sure TV manufacturers are always trying to push new features, but I never feel bad about having purchased a nice tv the following year when hearing about the new hotness. The life-cycle is much more reasonable.

[@HaloViewAR]

I just got one for Christmas, it’s so amazing!! 🎉

[@vrgirl4454]

NOC NOK app, dude, one of the great apps on avp, don't thank me.

[@macman2141]

I absolutely love my AVP ❤

[@ennis_w]

When KZbinrs bring Vision Pro as their only computer to WWDC, editing and uploading videos with it, then Apple’s “spatial computing” dream is true.

[@cheekster777]

Happy New Year Brian.

[@tacojohnellenich]

Too heavy for sure, but as I’ve used mine throughout the year I’ve kinda got used to it strangely. Watching movies and remote playing my PS5 are things I do on the regular with mine.

[@francescopillinini8811]

I love my apple Vison pro

[@alex_of_the_Mi_ag_gi]

I have one - the cinema experience is the only thing i really use it for - great for movie watching, especially when travelling. It is cool to do other ‘ecosystem’ stuff and using Siri is great with it. The virtual desktop is amazing but it needs to work out the box (eg whenever a powered up Mac is nearby) as it is annoying to have to click ‘connect’ each time… if you go to the toilet and take your headset off you have to set the whole thing up again (close and shut the Mac…wait a few seconds….click connect…resize the screen etc..) so its unusable if you Mac work is just doing quick tasks. Photos and 3d phots are cool. The weight and the fact its not ‘that’ easy to put on and get in (it takes several seconds to position on your face correctly, do the password entry (even the eye scanner takes a few seconds) and wait for the wifi to connect. It needs to be completely seamless, lightweight and more durable for real day to day use.. its too fiddly right now but when you are up and running - its an amazing experience and really useful.. im guessing they will take 3 iterations to get it right..

[@rafdamiaens]

I haven’t tried it myself, but I did get a chance to demo it in the Apple Store and was blown away. Your perspective as a real user really resonated with me, it makes perfect sense!

[@chbald60]

I love my avp❤

[@HylensonBerald]

Oh😊

[@PSYCHOV3N0M]

I say the following as a Samsung fan who LOVES the Apple Vision Pro: The price is NOT the problem. Vision Pro can cost $1,000 and it STILL wouldn't sell like hotcakes. Why? Because most people don't want to wear a HEADSET. If anything, they would prefer to wear actual Smart Glasses in the future. Meta Quest 2 sold like 20 Million units in 2020 due to the pandemic lockdown. Meta Quest 3 is nowhere near that number and yet it's made of plastic which makes it lightweight. Most people don't care about 3D VR content. That's just the disappointing truth. I hope 3D immersive content makes a huge impact on mass consumers in the future. Not holding my breath though...

[@eastonbrewer1798]

That’s exactly right, I was thinking of buying a meta quest 3 or 3s because I’ve never had a vr headset before but I really don’t understand the full use case of these devices yet honestly. The games do look cool but I kind of want these devices to be able to do everything my phone does for example and I don’t know if we’re completely there yet. That’s precisely what I had in mind. I’ve never owned a VR headset before, so I was considering buying a Meta Quest 3 or 3S. However, I genuinely don’t fully comprehend the comprehensive capabilities of these devices yet. While the games appear visually appealing, I genuinely desire these devices to replicate the functionality of my phone, and I’m uncertain if we’ve fully achieved that yet.

[@jaywhite1141]

Happy new year 🥳

[@timrideshotshot]

Controller support!

[@johnwilson7680]

I love it for 3-D movies and it’s great for general media consumption, but there is enough glare that I find myself preferring a TV for non-3-D content. The lack of controllers also limits its usability in a big way. It’s great to be able to use my hands for things that don’t require a controller, but it’s still clunky and I find myself having to click my fingers together multiple times for it to register. It’s nowhere near the same usability as the Quest headsets with their controllers.

[@vrgirl4454]

I love my avp and recently discovered a new app for watching 3D online videos that is simply awesome. 【NOC NOK】 App.

[@DancingDave1]

Can’t wait to see your review of the Xreal one pro, Brian !

[@milanpintar]

finally more discussion

[@jakekisiel7399]

People make fun of this guy because of his hair, but I like his hair.

[@chrisfu81123]

Very nice 👍

[@Aggie4life77]

Brian I agree with everything you said. $1500 is absolutely the sweet spot for this to go mass market. To be honest, I think the 4K OLED displays is the most expensive component right now. Everything else is 2+ year old tech. I think that by late 2025 or early 2026, they could release a cheaper version with the same tech we have now. Another thing is that they may be partnering with Sony to use their PSVR controllers. Things are about to get interesting! I want the big dog though. Give me a lighter Pro with higher specs and I’ll gladly pay $3500!

[@James-lw3gi]

Too heavy to wear? I use the annapro 2 strap on it, using it changes the game. It’s not heavy at all.

[@magic_fruit_bat5003]

Make Apple Great Again

[@rcuadro]

I did the demo at the Apple Store and the AVP is effing amazing!!! But not amazing enough to spend that kind of money money on it.

[@PSYCHOV3N0M]

TRANSLATION: It's not amazing to me. If it was, I would've spent the money for it.

[@Aggie4life77]

@@PSYCHOV3N0MWell he did say he would spend the money if it was cheaper. $3500 for most people is out of reach for something you will use casually! You phone and more so your computer can justify higher prices as those are damn near necessities these days!

[@chrisfu81123]

Nice round up with the iPhone air 17 and smarthome to ultra watch. But very interested in Vision Pro and the future of that…

[@chrisfu81123]

Somewhat converted. 😅

[@jimmyville]

Love the Apple Vision Pro - it's my favourite way to watch TV and movies. Apple needs to invest heavily in content and funding app development to drive weekly announcements and hype, similar to when they first rolled our Apple TV+. It's an amazing product but for people to stay excited there needs to be something new to talk about.

[@BarelyAverageDude]

Visor from Immersed is coming to shake things up in the VR/AR space

[@1136tscc]

I’m deep in Apple ecosystem but for this, because I can’t justify the $5000 CAD. So I bought a Meta Q3 this Christmas to get into VR. Its amazing

[@badabing8884]

I tried it last year for half an hour in the Apple Store. It’s a wonderful experience but I wouldn’t shell out 3.5k for it. Plus, the lack of ability to share your experience with family/friends without them having to have their own or putting yours on will always limit the mass appeal IMO like the iPhone or Mac.

[@imaxximus]

Count me as your 4th friend. It’s magically great.

[@KOKOBC]

Honestly when it came out I got it day one and played around with it for 2 weeks then returned it and proceeded to get a meta quest 3, and I don’t even use the meta quest 3 that much anymore, but that quest I got for only 430 so I don’t really care nearly as much as

[@ranyw]

$1499 without the external screen. We’ve got a deal.

[@cpaek72]

price, comfort, price... That's all they need to do. The developers will come once they start selling in mass.

[@MikeFields83]

DROP…THE…PRICE…APPLE

[@tbirdparis]

Or just cancel the product and put resources into things people actually want.

[@staplessmartsolutions1854]

@@tbirdparis And what things would that be?

[@michaelhall9146]

I give you best price: $3450

[@PSYCHOV3N0M]

WON'T..... MAKE..... A..... DIFFERENCE..... Most people don't want to wear a HEADSET.

[@tbirdparis]

@@staplessmartsolutions1854 obviously Apple know which of their products have the highest demand and sell the most. So, focus on them.

[@AM_9924]

Apple made a mistake with the price in the first place. Make it cheaper and lighter and you have my money.

[@rafdamiaens]

Rome wasn’t built in a day, you know! Jeez

[@bryanrichard9320]

I was going to say, it needs to be around iPhone pricing. $1k. Also a controller for gaming needs to built

[@IamtheDill]

Meta Quest 3 is amazing.

[@MobileDecay]

I noticed the same thing with my Xreals. If I don't leave them out I don't really use them. Lol.

[@oaki5286]

Visionnaire will do well in France! 😂

[@rebow2568]

Coming in Apple WWDC 2025, Nintendo will reveal the Mario Kart game for Apple Vision Pro for celebrating 40 Years of Super Mario Bros. since the Mario Kart ride attraction at Super Nintendo World.

[@mattjulian8153]

A little less expensive for sure But…it’s too isolationist. What is needed is…linked satellite Vision units that enable families/friends to enjoy the experience TOGETHER at a price that is not so prohibitive

[@seanreynoldscs]

It wouldn’t be too expensive if it had the functionality of a laptop instead of an iPad.

[@CJGilliam]

If you bought it during the release month, using Apple credit, next month would be your last payment.

[@brendanlesko2306]

Blocking porn on it was silly .

[@TheJayair]

What Apple should have done, is make it accessible to everyone at a reasonable price range. Spend two years fixing the bugs and making the features far more better. 1st gen should have been their testing ground and with enough feedback from consumers from all walks of life, it would have been a better strategy and also getting other software developers to get into the tech. Stupidity is for Apple to think they can get away with the absurdity of price what delivering a half cooked product.

[@staplessmartsolutions1854]

Afternoon sir, I would love to have a convo with you about how this bad clickbait only video from Brian has led people to have strong but incorrect and misinformed information about this product. If open I would like to have a convo about how honestly most of your points are not valid issues.

[@PSYCHOV3N0M]

A lower price would change NOTHING even at $1,000. Most people don't want to wear a HEADSET.

[@Gatitasecsii]

Absolutely wrong, this was the proper approach, there are people who want this product for 3500 dollars believe it or not. You not being a part of that demographic doesn't mean it doesn't matter. With this product out there, they can gage reception as well as listen to feedback. They've already made big improvements to the OS, and if/when the more affordable version hits the market, it will be a huge improvement. This is usually how new tech goes.

[@givingflopera]

@@PSYCHOV3N0Magreed. Honestly its uncomfortable to wear one especially for people who care about their skin. it can causes redness, breakouts, etc.

[@davidbkk171]

Vision pro = Mac lisa

[@francescopillinini8811]

Apple Vision Pro will always be the big boy even if they maker cheaper ones I deffo not given mine up! also people will know you went for a cheaper one just to save money Quality really does count why settle for plastic.

[@wesjackson7437]

Dude, $1499 is too much. I think Apple needs to make it under $1000, like $999. It needs to be that entry level MacBook Air price.

[@briantong]

With the technology that's in there...it's NOT going to be under $1000

[@darkguardian1314]

Google Cardboard seen more use and it was cheap...

[@blastbuilder2430]

Pay studios to create content, lots of them. That is the only way to save the product.

[@rafdamiaens]

There’s nothing to “save” here. It’s just the first step in a long journey that they’ve already planned out and that no one else knows about.

[@Riceordie]

I’m just waiting for some battery with an HDMI input and output so I can connect my PlayStation five to it

[@emtydoctrine]

Not a fan of the XREAL One Pro. But if a future Apple Vision Pro is priced around $1500 ... I will buy that.

[@oryviej]

How about $500

[@briantong]

Are you being realistic...?

[@Gatitasecsii]

​@@briantong Ever heard of the Meta Quest 3?

[@jase298hkhk]

I'm ok with spending 3.5k for just watching VR porn with good clarity. But the file sharing with windows stopped working recently and this is literally a paper weight to me. I stopped upgrading my iphone this year after upgrading my iphone for the past 15 years because how bad this product is. It needs to have apps and games if they're selling it as a computer implanted VR headsets for the mass public. I'm moving out of Apple's eco cycle if they're leaving Vision pro at it's current state.

[@eastonbrewer1798]

Apple consistently has plans for its products, but it takes some time for the public to discover them.

[@jase298hkhk]

@@eastonbrewer1798 I check the app store every week, none of them is worth a second look.

[@jase298hkhk]

@@eastonbrewer1798 It's been almost a year and the only thing changes is that the file sharing with windows no longer works, this is a piece of garbage doesn't matter how you spin it.

[@Modok51]

Get real Tong! AVP continues to be a bridge too far in 2024 & dare I say also in 2025!

[@briantong]

I never said it will happen, I said, what they need to do.

[@ervandallo]

You know what they should do, not cost so much as an arm and a leg.

[@zants_]

3:46 I thought he said "I'm not talking about $1,099" and said to myself "yep, I agree, probably more like iPhone pricing, around $899-$999 maybe", but then when he said "I'm talking about something around $1499" I realize I misheard him. $1499 is still just too much for a lite version - I could see that being the "Apple Vision" standard model price, but I really do think there needs to be an even lighter/Air/SE whatever model that's priced below $1k (I would personally go for that $1499 standard model myself, but for mass adoption the psychology of that price is just too much). Though, from this perspective of a slow rollout, that would make sense in year two to come out with a standard model at $1499, capture some of the non-dev tech/Apple fans like myself, and then in year three or four aim for that sub-$1k every-man model.

[@madhavsanthosh3422]

If that happens I am totally sold.

[@eastonbrewer1798]

My primary concern is that MacBooks have consistently been priced at $1,000 or more, and I anticipate that this product will follow a similar trajectory, potentially never falling below $1,000.

[@gregorygeorge8695]

Expensive, uncomfortable, heavy, headsets are still too weird for people, and most importantly, its App Store is basically dead in terms of significant experiences and that's the only thing that would get people to ignore all the cons I just listed before.

[@eleegs]

They are already behind Meta when it comes to most relevant user experience for an AR device. Single user experiences cannot cost $3k with a bunch of computing functionality that is still inferior to a desktop computer. Immersion for gaming and media is the golden key. People don’t want an awesome experience that they cannot easily show off and share. Until there is more VR connectivity with other users (Ready Player One for example), the value of the device is none existent beyond the Apple store demo

[@darkguardian1314]

Most Vision Pros haven't seen much use since they were reviewed by influencers. Most just sit in the closet. Funcutionality and useablity should be at the top of the list. The goofy LED face mask should be ditched for something like digital emoji eyes or something. There's also the issue of service and repair so it's easily fixed. Finally, Apple (and others) need to ditch proprietary model of special connectors and power banks. When the include power bank runs out the replacement bank with attached cord is $200 plus tax. It's why I'm no longer dazzled with Apple dangling pretty shiny things in front of me.

[@eastonbrewer1798]

I think because this is the Apple Vision Pro the front screen will always be there. But, when they release Apple vision for example it would be nice if they ditched that “feature”.

[@pandaholic82]

Meta is beating apple to the AR/VR space. Apple Vision Pro needs massive improvements: weight, price, design. Meta Ray Bans were a more visionary approach.

[@coffeecoffeecoffee7651]

How on earth did Kara and Nate end up in this video? 😂

[@BryanLankston]

I really like mine. But I don’t know another person that owns one. I also have found that I have to intentionally plan to use it. It’s not like your iPhone or iPad that you can just causally pick up and start using it. They need to get its battery life improved and improve standby time. So many times I want to use it and it’s not charged so I end up just getting my iPad instead. I have high hopes for VisionOS 3. If they can make a compelling software experience that makes me want to use it over my other devices then it will be worth it. But right now it’s an expensive movie machine and an amazing display for my MacBook.

[@darcsentor]

As developer the 30% tax hurts. You have a choice of writing an app, one with no extra costs(web app) or one with 30% extra costs(native). For a lot of apps you already have a web app but there are a lot of extra costs to write a native app and then the extra 30%. Web apps suck compared to native ones too. While i am working on a Vision Pro app, I first need to solve the 30% issue. In businesses a gross profit of 30% js the average , adding 30% extra costs would cause most business in the world to fail. Software can be different but I don’t see why users should have to pay 30% more so Apple can make even more huge profits. Apple could do everything they do on the App Store for 5% or less and still make great profits from the App Store. Guess we gotta keep the rich people rich.

[@votdfak]

AVP is expensive, isolating, design flawed device. I own Quest 3, also isolating, but you get controllers, it's affordable, you can easily share device, it's lighter and without external cables. I own Ray Ban Meta glasses, Meta AI is really useful (even if it's a pain to get it to work outside USA). I would get those devices from Apple even with Apple tax, but they don't offer glasses and AVP is at least 7x pricier then Quest 3.

[@_mattaeus_]

Quest is a toy.. to play with.. Vision Pro is not.. I’d share a quest w anyone.. NOT the Vision Pro. Controllers I don’t care one bit about cause for me it isn’t a TOY.. quest is lighter? By how much? LOLOLOL I gave away my quest when I got Vision Pro and weight difference is virtually NONE..while quality difference is SUBSTANTIAL

[@votdfak]

@@_mattaeus_ AVP is 600-650gr + 335gr for battery vs Quest 3 515gr. You can search for info yourself, for example on your AVP. Let's agree to disagree.

[@justinphy7229]

Give me AVATAR THE LAST AIRBENDER on a VR headset and I’ll buy whichever one has it! Your boy wants to be a water bender lol

[@engagermedia]

make it out of plastic, bump the price down by 1000 bucks and everyone will buy it

[@Bloooo95]

Tbh, I wouldn't buy it if it were $300. I personally just have no interest in VR/AR personally and I think it's doomed to be a niche product lane. Apple's failure to showcase it is as an interesting form factor really cemented that thinking for me.

[@douglasolson675]

Good take on the Vision Pro. I want one, but just not willing to put down 4 grand!! 😳

[@samlloyd6197]

My guess is it will be discontinued and abandoned for a smaller lighter or affordable something it’s cool and everything but not worth the money

[@DJBathtub]

It would be great if they pushed the tech too and made a really high-end updated version. I can’t stomach the price but be amazing to see what they could really do. Happy New Year!

[@jrafaelsolorzano]

Is this an ad?

[@eastonbrewer1798]

No, Apple doesn’t pay people to review their products they do not care if they do or not.

[@Optimus-Prime-Rib]

Cheaper. The end.

[@Shingeneration]

First of all they should release it worldwide to all markets. Keeping it restrained to just USA so far and maybe a couple of other countries this year is just plain dumb. None of the products which were released this way worked - even really good home pod, which flopped. Why? Limited release only in selected markets 🤦‍♂️ stupid!

[@Tryingtoexploretheworld]

Apple Vision Pro won’t get good until 2026 sine you can’t really do much on it currently

[@Ktulubass]

Apple must do the iPhone mirroring in the Vision Pro they owe it to us who bought the Vision PRO. 😊

[@mikeshafer]

My AVP stays in the case 99% of the time, I just don't have a reason to love it as much as I wish I did, for the price. It also gives me crazy eye strain so I think they need to pivot to something like augmented reality.

[@Aggie4life77]

Even with proscription lenses?

[@mikeshafer]

@ I had lasik long ago. No lenses needed

[@vrgirl4454]

It's normal that some people just don't like AVP, just like some people don't like iPhone, I like avp because I can use it to watch movies, and other apps like NOC NOK that can watch 3D videos are also one of my favorites.

[@staplessmartsolutions1854]

This is clearly a only wish-list video and nothing actually based in any factual information. I will start with the major issue first, That not only Brian but a lot of KZbinrs are saying which is ridiculous and makes no sense at all if you pay attention. Why would Apple be working on a new device when not only they just finished their global release less than 60 days ago (November 15th South Korea and UAE), they are currently working with Sony to get motion controllers to work with AVP (Also possibly port PSVR2 games over) and the device has not even been out for a full year. Secondly, cheaper products like Oculus Quest 2 released 10/13/2020 and the Quest 3 released on 10/10/2023 were 3 years apart. Why would Apple release a new headset after only 1 year. And for the people that will say Covid, I intentionally left off the Quest Pro that was released 10/25/2022 (during covid) Lastly, if you listen to people in the company (Tim Cook). He stated that this device has legs and growth in spaces that does not apply to games and media. Hospitals are using AVP’s to wear while performing surgeries and tons of Fortune 500 companies are implementing the AVP into their companies. I follow Brian Tong KZbin page and have been a supporter of him since he was with CNET but this is just lazy journalism a bad clickbait video.

[@briantong]

Thanks for watching and continuing to watch, but did you read the title...how is it clickbait? When it's literally set up as an opinion piece. 'Lazy'...please, look at the breadth of my content before you throw around words like that. If anything, that's a lazy comment.

[@staplessmartsolutions1854]

@@briantong I appreciate the response and don't want to come off angry or disrespectful but you know there is no way Apple will be releasing new hardware in 2025. I would count on AirPower before new Apple Vision Pro 2 or SE or whatever people want to name this fan speculated $1,500 version.

[@Gatitasecsii]

​@@staplessmartsolutions1854 Cmon dude, the video is literally just what he thinks Apple should do, it's not clickbait.

[@alexanderfazel]

Apple Vision Pro is really impressive and underrated. The improvements in VisionOS 2.1 are fantastic. I look forward to a less expensive and lighter product. EyeSight can probably be ditched in favor of a lighter frame.

[@vrgirl4454]

I love my avp, it's normal that some people just don't like AVP, just like some people don't like iPhone, I like avp because I can use it to watch movies, and apps like NOC NOK that can watch 3D videos are also one of my favorites.

[@chrisfu81123]

🫡

[@chrisfu81123]

The ultra watch

[@BlackWidowYT_FPS]

Price tag is the reason I didn’t get it, hopefully the lighter version gets way cheaper (I am thinking like $1500)

[@goobfilmcast4239]

I'd like to see a streamlined, lower-cost AVP variant that focuses on the immersive Cinema experience....basically a color rich, sharp 4k monitor for your face with a basic front cam for safe passthrough, limited or no image capture and a 4 hour battery life. Strictly a media consumption device. I have ZERO desire to virtually fish or play ping--pong with a cartoon walrus

[@Fearless13468]

Give up. They are waaaay off the mark on what people both want and need.

[@Brok33nrubber]

Love my APV but Apple can improve the items below: 1. Make it easy to mirror to iPhone via Bluetooth so you can guide a guest on how to use it. Very frustrating trying to guide a guest without seeing what they’re looking at. 2. Make a KZbin or TikTok application for immersive content. More content like The Weekends music video would be insane! 3. Make 3D movies free on Apple+ I refuse to pay extra for individual 3D movies. Increase subscription ok but don’t charge individually 👎

[@PSYCHOV3N0M]

Don't be naive. Paying a recurring rental fee is stupid.

[@markbennett6658]

AVP is super clever but niche. It’s not just about the cost although that’s a limiting factor. Even if they were lightweight AR glasses many, people who don’t suffer impaired vision would be reluctant to wear, them throughout the course of their daily life. 3D movies at the cinema decades ago were a novelty, that never became that huge and 3D televisions were a dead end 20 years ago. I think if Apple succeed it will be a long and winding road. Perhaps I haven’t got the ‘vision’ though?

[@vrgirl4454]

I love my avp, it's normal that some people just don't like AVP, just like some people don't like iPhone, I like avp because I can use it to watch movies, and apps like NOC NOK that can watch 3D videos are also one of my favorites.

[@JohnSmith-zi9or]

Zero interest in a AVP. I'm not a boomer. LOL

[@JamesGMeisel]

Why they call you Skunk Boy, you smell? 🦨

[@RedPanda555]

If you bought the first gen Vision Pro, you’re either too rich, too gullible or too impatient 😂

[@macman2141]

I have friends who drive $70,000 dollar teslas telling me I must be wealthy for buying a $3400 dollar headset 😂