Anna namaste please paramahansa yogananda scintific Healing affirmation book gurinichi chapara
@krishnarapolu26402 ай бұрын
Good morning anna ❤ Krishna surat 10.37am
@sandhyas1252 ай бұрын
మాన్యతలు నిజం అవుతాయనే, ఇప్పుడు Affirmations రాసుకోమని చెప్తున్నరు.
@madhukiranattivilli23212 ай бұрын
Swami Sarvapriyananda Advaita Vedanta talks vintunnappudu naaku same doubt vachindhi -- satyam ni chudadam intha easy na? Intha easy aithe karma bhakti dyana yoga lu endhuku! Naaku confusion povadaniki chaala time pattindhi. Finally understood from Sarva's words later AV recommended gnána yoga -- intellectual practice, to see brahman (or spirit or atma) in everything -- in thoughts, in actions, in non-living things like rocks, in bodies, etc. But how can I do that? This is what Ashtavakra is suggesting to Janaka here. Not so simple. Risa meeru damn easy annattu chepthunnaaru At 1 point Sarva said gnána yoga works only for the ULTRA REFINED mind. May be Ashtavakra suggested to Janaka as unknowingly his mind was already refined. The rest have to practice karma bhakti dhyána yogas to sharpen the mind, focus the mind, and eventually silence it So Sarva said the ashtanga yoga of Pathanjali is an important prerequisite for any spiritual aspirant before he can be capable of practicising gnána yoga of AV Risa, if we connect the dots, all this feels correct -- Bhagavadgita is summary of the upanishads (or vedanta). Advanta Vedanta is 1 way of looking at the upanishads (prakriti is not real, but an appearance of purusha). Buddha/Osha/Sadhguru ways (called the Sankhya school of philosophy) is another way -- prakriti n purusha co-exist. When BG is so tightly associated with Vedantas, why will BG recommend useless yogas? There lies the trick. Everything is required If u say "all this is nonsense (which u said in many talks), just see (as JK or Osho said), or find "who am I" (as Ramana said), they too are forms of "living in the present moment", and so are dhyana yoga (when mind is not doing any task) or karma yoga (when mind is working on some task)" Makes sense?
@alladisuresh56842 ай бұрын
Hii Anna
@dakshinamurthykota93452 ай бұрын
Risa గారు.... మీ జ్ఞాన సంపదకు జోహార్లు.... నాకో చిన్న సందేహం.... జనకుడు త్రేటాయుగానికి చెందిన వ్యక్తి కదా.. మరి అష్టావక్ర గీత భగవద్గీత కన్నా ముందు వున్నదా....?
@satyanarayanachunduru40232 ай бұрын
Saakshi stitilo undadam ela
@KanthRisa2 ай бұрын
Deenne pattinchukoku.. just be
@venkataramanakovvuru29532 ай бұрын
🙏🪷🙏
@madhukiranattivilli23212 ай бұрын
@8:25 : "prapancham undhi, daani patla nuvvu erparachukunna bhavanalu abaddham" I don't agree At the level of brahman, antha abaddhame, brahman okkate sathyam At the level of mind, i.e. at psychological level, thoughts are real, but "I" anedhi abaddham, "I" is mind's imagination, which is nothing but a set of thoughts that give a separate identity to this particular mind-body form Thoughts generate from data in memory. Thoughts are used by mind to analyze things in the universe and determine next course of actions. How can such thoughts be abaddham? If they are abaddham, the actions that are outcome of those thoughts will also become abaddham No⁉