Arabia Before Islam: An Animated Documentary

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you for watching our first video on Pre-Islamic Arabia! What was your favourite part of the video? We’d love to hear your feedback in the comments! If you enjoyed the content, please LIKE the video to help us reach more viewers, SUBSCRIBE for more fascinating history, and SHARE it with friends who might find it interesting.

[@Polka22666]

never heard about this side of the world before. you’ve got a new sub! I’d love to hear more from you about the Byzantine and Arab wars.

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you for subscribing! We're glad to hear you enjoyed the content and discovered something new. We’d love to cover more about the Byzantine and Arab wars in future videos. Stay tuned for more exciting content!

[@Polka22666]

@@HistoryNext thank you, I’ve shared your context to people I know. Appreciate you’re a new channel and currently at growing phase. Please keep it up, post a new video soon 🔥🔥

[@Ali-w5u3s]

I want more of his videos as soon as possible especially battles. This animation is so good.

[@Jk_kabeer]

This documentary beautifully captures the rich history and vibrant culture of the Arab world before Islam. The storytelling and animation bring to life the complexity of their societies, traditions, and achievements. A must watch for anyone interested in understanding the roots of Arab heritage.

[@muslimresponse103]

the Arabs were nothing before Islam. history speaks for itself!

[@shwetankjogadia2810]

Make more such videos on arab world and it's contemporaries civilization. This was very informative

[@Ali-w5u3s]

If you can also cover battles in detail then they will greatly boost your viewership. Also keep on teoling about unexplored parts of history in your videos. That will be great.

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you so much for your feedback! We're glad you enjoyed the video. Covering battles in detail is definitely something we’re considering for future content. We’d love to know what specific battles or historical events you find most interesting!

[@Ali-w5u3s]

@@HistoryNext I would like any but probably those which are most dramatic and those which are mostly undiscovered in most KZbin videos

[@Dawah_Help]

Gorgeous maps bring everything to life!

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you! We're glad you enjoyed the maps! They really do help bring the stories to life. Stay tuned for more!

[@GeoBlits]

Epic vid

[@Loremeister737]

Can you do a video on the horn of africa and the history of the ancient cushite people and their long history of trade such as the "Barbaria Region" and the ancient macrobians and Somali city trading city states These were truly the ancient classical antiquity worlds most luxurious wealthy trading states

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you for your insightful comment! The Horn of Africa and the ancient Cushite people are indeed captivating subjects, and their trade history, including the Barbaria region and the ancient Macrobians, holds immense significance. We truly appreciate your suggestion and will keep it in mind for future content. Stay tuned for more explorations of classical antiquity!

[@Loremeister737]

@HistoryNext amazing looking forward to your upcoming videos 👍👍 The horn of africa is unfortunately an underrated topic of history, especially since it has such an ocean of reliable historical content

[@satanwithinternet2753]

damn W vid FAm

[@zhcultivator]

Please leave a list of sources for this video 🙏 🙏 for us.

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you for your request! We appreciate your interest in our sources. We aim to add a credits page for upcoming videos, considering your suggestion. Stay tuned!

[@Aristocles22]

"Hisotry" in the thumbnail image.

[@HistoryNext]

Thanks! Hope you enjoyed the video. What topics would you like to explore next?

[@magma9000]

🇵🇰❤️

[@ANAN-er8rg]

Thers nothing in arabia called clan you mean a tribe and they are not united. tribe form by one grandfather that every tribe share. banu tamim are descended from a man called tamim ibn murr. qurish descended from a man called Fihr ibn Malik

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you for your comment. We appreciate your perspective, and it’s great to see your understanding of the genealogical aspects of tribes like Banu Tamim and Quraysh. The term 'clan' has been used by several scholars, including Albert Hourani, Firas Al Khateeb, and Safiur-Rahman, to describe the social structures in pre-Islamic Arabia. While these tribes trace their lineage to specific ancestors, clans often refer to groups of families that form the basis of tribal society. The unity within tribes varied, and they were not always cohesive. If there’s enough interest from viewers, we would be happy to consider creating a video that delves into genealogy in more detail. Thank you for engaging with the video!

[@mufaddal2152]

Did you say Cairo was founded by the Abbasids/Ummayed? Cairo was founded by Fatemids who are Shias.

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you for your comment. Our point was that for centuries, Arabs - including dynasties like the Umayyads and Abbasids -dominated the world stage and contributed significantly to the development of great centres of learning. While Cairo was founded by the Fatimids, who were also Arabs, the overall achievements of these Arab empires laid the groundwork for the Islamic Golden Age. The focus is on Arab contributions in general, not any specific dynasty. Hope you enjoyed the video - stay tuned for the next episode!

[@pedrosancez-tg1dt]

Latta and Huzza saudi god before Statue Like Indian Gods pagan

[@sultansandscholars6339]

Are the Indian god Somnath and the Arabian goddess Al-Laat connected?

[@nothing00164]

Yeah due to greek influence ​@@sultansandscholars6339

[@pedrosancez-tg1dt]

@sultansandscholars6339 its equal because its equal - same statue 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[@MaverickSeventySeven]

PLEASE NOTE - Mecca did NOT exist until around 700 AD - therefore a Muhammad could not have been born there!

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

The arab conquests were secular and had nothing to do with the religion called Islam we know today which was created by the Abbasids also Prophet Muhammad never existed he was simply an Abbasid invention inspired by being inspired by existing legendary figures to create their own holy prophet and religion. There was already a past all they did was alter it and make it fit what they desired.

[@HistoryNext]

Thank you for your comment. While views may differ, the historical consensus, based on textual analysis and early Islamic sources, confirms the existence of the Prophet Muhammad and the religious nature of early Arab conquests. Islam’s rise in the 7th century, guided by the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad and continued by the Rashidun Caliphs, was key to this expansion. The Abbasids did not 'invent' the religion but contributed to its later development. These conclusions are well-documented in academic research. Thanks for engaging with the video.

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

@@HistoryNext yes but the way he has been described in the traditional narrative is all fictional and should not be taken historically there may have been a preacher, warlord, merchant but not the holy prophet of Islam as he has been described in the traditional narrative if take it to be literaly then we should accept that Santa clause exists and the legends about king Arthur are real you see the double standards.

[@mahmoodabbasi6120]

​​​@@DomainofKnowlegdiathere is no such thing as Arab conquest...it was Muslim conquest When the Rashidun Caliphs (centuries before the Abbasids) started their Persian & Byzantine campaign they called on their enemies to become Muslims and submit to Islam. No Arab nationalism or tribal warfare was involved it was purely a religious conquest. Propeht Muhammad existed, lived, struggled, suffered, survived, rose and succeeded lived the life of a man worked, did business, married, settled, had children, bought property, died. ...more proof of him than Jesus.

[@DomainofKnowlegdia]

@@mahmoodabbasi6120 Nope you have no evidence for any of this just oral traditions passed down from generation to generation and forged documents and fabricated artifacts from his time bring something which isn't biased.

[@natos2334]

@@DomainofKnowlegdiado you any actual reasons to believe that he didnt exist? Because historians agree that he existed.