Arendt Revisited with Samantha Rose Hill and D.N. Rodowick

[@susanluraschi1400]

To answer the last question I would like to nominate David Graeber, anthropologist and anarchist, who, unfortunately is no longer with us.

[@clevelandlovett7909]

1) What would Arendt say to the idea of social media being a benefit to political activity? Particularly, I am wondering how Arendt might have viewed social media as a danger to the private and public realms. In other words, would Arendt see the social realm in contemporary social media politics as being a danger in the same way she discusses it being such to the private and public realms of her time? 2) Does Arendt account for the public/private distinctions line being blurred by the rise of the social in the context of Black Lives Matter opposing the power of the nation-state, considering that Arendt has a problem with the nation-state's social power? Would Arendt agree with BLM’s social media beginning as a modern technological way to effectuate political activity? 3) Where does Arendt's views on her "conscientious objector" versus "civil disobedients" argument intersect with Black Lives Matter and its oppositions to and protests against "nonobjectionable laws?"