@@Sacrifice.Online.for.Offline The bridge between the left and right hemispheres of a brain :)
@BFrydell7 сағат бұрын
@@Sacrifice.Online.for.Offlinethe bridge between left brain (Dawkins) and right brain (Peterson)
@KingBladeSeven7 сағат бұрын
@@Sacrifice.Online.for.OfflineBrain tissue connecting the left (logical) and right (creative) hemispheres
@victornilsson54287 сағат бұрын
@@Sacrifice.Online.for.Offline He is the moderator in this discussion, and if you mean about the corpus callosum then that is the bridge between the left and right hemispheres of the brain
@evantaylorfishing76037 сағат бұрын
Peterson: "Well, this interview really kills 2 birds with 1 stone." Dawkins: "That's ridiculous, we aren't killing any birds. We are sitting here talking"
@patricksampsonmusic7 сағат бұрын
Nailed it lol. Not everything is “If it’s not LITERAL, it’s not real.”
@DavidMirambi6 сағат бұрын
😂
@johnowens53426 сағат бұрын
😂
@JoeNewland66 сағат бұрын
😂😂
@kristinanderson19836 сағат бұрын
@@evantaylorfishing7603 🎯
@camakaze13303 сағат бұрын
I remember reading 12 rules for life in 2018 as an atheist undergraduate, and despite being a massive fan of JP, the religious connotations made me judge his messaging in an almost arrogant manner. Now it’s 2024 and I have found faith and have never been happier or lived and loved with more purpose. I often find myself getting emotional watching JP, his passion for life is contagious, I hope I get the opportunity to thank him personally one day
@ZwartOpZwart6 сағат бұрын
The enthusiasm of Peterson is truely inspiring. He wants to play and is trying his best to get Dawkins to dance with him. He does not give up because he believes in the beauty of the logos and the part Dawkins can play in it. Dawkins however stands on the side of the dancefloor refusing to bust out a move until the final song comes on called "the Baldwin-effect". All the effort Peterson has put in has finally paid off as they are tap dancing together.
@heidiooohs6 сағат бұрын
Love this haha
@ZwartOpZwart6 сағат бұрын
@@heidiooohs 😂😂
@divelostmind6 сағат бұрын
A beautiful dance
@ZwartOpZwart5 сағат бұрын
@@divelostmind yes indeed. Curious about the second part on the Daily wire..
@oh_alien5 сағат бұрын
Yes! It's because Peterson asked him the right questions!
@MihaZ5 сағат бұрын
It's funny, growing up in a religious community, I found relief in the books of Dawkins and Hitchens. Couple years ago, Peterson's lecture about the Bible made me reconnect with my upbringing. Not in terms of faith, I'm still very much atheist. But it comforted me that there was something of value in all those years I spent at Church. Now, with children of my own, I'm trying to navigate our deteriorating social fabric and I long for the religious life my parents had. What a strange journey it has been. I find myself siding a lot more with Peterson nowadays, which would have been unthinkable 15 years ago.
@BigfootRAHHH3 сағат бұрын
That's a relief. I was getting so used to the negativity associated with JP, it's great to hear about someone who would've never imagined themselves taking a liking to him finding a connection there. I wish the best for you and your family!
@jkm93323 сағат бұрын
You should look into Jesus.
@johnjackson97673 сағат бұрын
Hopefully you come back.
@RSNDRUMS3 сағат бұрын
Keep the faith that you do have and nurture it, best of luck to you and your family!
@mrchrisadams433 сағат бұрын
Alot of people feel this way....Jordan Peterson should be canonized for sainthood. He has resurrected Jesus in a sense......
@zpotler8 сағат бұрын
I was explaining to my wife why this episode is so exciting and her summary, “so it’s like Godzilla vs King Kong?”
@noahjones11927 сағат бұрын
lol
@Youttubeuser209327 сағат бұрын
She's a keeper, bro.
@zpotler7 сағат бұрын
@@Youttubeuser20932 for real
@williamsmith50497 сағат бұрын
Huh? Dawkins is pathetic. This is Godzilla vs curious George
@Youttubeuser209326 сағат бұрын
@@williamsmith5049 The fact that christians are too blinded to see that dawkins is brilliant and that JP is using 10x more words than he has to to convince them that he is actually a believer, is one of the things that makes christianity and other religions bad for society. They blind people to reality, on a basis of nothing solid.
@Denver_McKenzie8 сағат бұрын
Lets thank Alex's moustache for moderating this discussion. 🙏
@achipinthesugar7 сағат бұрын
He's going to have some detransitioner-level regret about doing the most important video of his life with that 'stache.
@ThrowbackYard7 сағат бұрын
The scruffy little scamp grew up so fast :’)
@volovodov7 сағат бұрын
The man just had to get himself looking mean enough to be a moderator.
@xxxneoxxx7 сағат бұрын
Movember is almost here mate.. we have a whole month here in Australia dedicated to it for the men's cancer foundation I think it is.
@WEARYBUNNY7 сағат бұрын
😂😂
@SydneyCarton20858 сағат бұрын
This is free? This is free!
@johnowens53426 сағат бұрын
😂 exactly
@daan2606 сағат бұрын
Minus the last 30 minutes
@mrbust9995 сағат бұрын
Which is good, I don't like how so many other experts gatekeep knowledge.
@SharedPhilosophy4 сағат бұрын
Ikr, we take these kinds of discussions are taken for granted now, its crazy how much the internet has changed sharing of information. People 50 years ago wouldn't even dream of getting anything like this for free
@christophernichols97073 сағат бұрын
Cost a little less than a night with you're mother !! On the corner
@marjozar24355 сағат бұрын
What a labor of love on Jordan's part. God bless him. And great job Alex.
@KyrieEleison35 сағат бұрын
Having watched 3/4ths through, this discussion marks a new key moment in Jordan’s public career and interest in the merging of psychology, religion, and story. I would recommend this to anyone as one of Jordan’s finest moments. Love his pursuit of truth and his unique usage of terminology to express these deep topics in an approach accessible to those unfamiliar with the literature on this subject.
@-Monad-8 сағат бұрын
Alex O'Connor has established himself as a good-faith interlocutor and mediator to both religous and non-religious philosophies. He is playing a crucial role in bridging the gap.
@Lyonessi8 сағат бұрын
His moustache is bridging the gap between classy and crickey
@-Monad-8 сағат бұрын
The comment about Sherlock Holmes living on Baker Street is a perfect example - Dawkins was getting stuck on that point based on a misunderstanding.
@cleftturnip77748 сағат бұрын
I didn't see the need for him at all.
@IndustrialMilitia8 сағат бұрын
@@cleftturnip7774 As a moderator, that mean's he's doing his job.
@palemoonlight968 сағат бұрын
for real, he’s a ray of light in a world full of fanaticism and stubbornness, always so well spoken, patient and calm
@papsbaraedi2008 сағат бұрын
Watching the guy that made me an atheist debate the guy that helped me return to my religious faith a great gift
@ninjason577 сағат бұрын
What convinced you the atheist worldview is inferior to the religious worldview?
@sosesuis7 сағат бұрын
Is that possible?, for me is like stop believing in Santa Claus, and then believing again, the is return impossible?, can you explain your history a little?
@mikeutube0117 сағат бұрын
@@sosesuiswatch Jonathan Pageu - Santa clause and the tooth fairy exist.
@mikeutube0117 сағат бұрын
@@ninjason57He’s sat on the left in the video
@xamfer1597 сағат бұрын
@@sosesuis I also had a similar experience. I can't say Jordan "made" me find God, but some of his ideas did help me find my own way eventually. I was definitely a Dawkins atheist in high school and early college though.
@cleftturnip77748 сағат бұрын
Jordan makes so much sense to me. I find the way Richard dismisses things because they aren't literal is pretty frustrating.
@phetmoz8 сағат бұрын
Dawkins is a shallow thinker.
@oambitiousone71007 сағат бұрын
He thinks like a textbook JBP thinks like an epic poem
@Belzediel7 сағат бұрын
Do you take the time to avoid figurative traffic, or just the literal stuff?
@Youttubeuser209327 сағат бұрын
@@phetmoz If by shallow you mean realistic, then yes.. Otherwise, absolutely not.
@user-ji5uf1yq7d7 сағат бұрын
@@Youttubeuser20932 Why not?
@brandana95535 сағат бұрын
We are blessed to be in the same era as Jordan Peterson he's a gem !
@t2nexx5614 сағат бұрын
Agreed between 40-55 min he was actually breathing fire 😂
@jorjicostava30183 сағат бұрын
@@t2nexx561that makes no sense! people can't breathe actual fire!
@CH-vc3yz6 сағат бұрын
One is talking about the painting and the other about the paint.
@MCharlesPainting5 сағат бұрын
The issue is clearly deeper than that. Richard tries to make the case that the paint is more important than the painting, and the paint is what created the painting -- not seeing or refusing to admit that the artist made the painting by making use of the paint. In fact: the only reason the paint exists is because the artist wanted it. I read an art book not long ago, and a certain blue (lapis, I think, but maybe it was something else) around 1600 was worth more than gold. That should tell you something!
@patricksampsonmusic4 сағат бұрын
@@MCharlesPaintinggreatly put friend!
@alial-jassim25043 сағат бұрын
@CH-vc3yz great analogy
@brentmanning3 сағат бұрын
100% accurate
@Foundingflounder8 сағат бұрын
Whatever you think about Peterson, this conversation was almost unthinkable a decade ago. Peterson has offered a home for those of us who felt displaced by the cold humanism of the New Atheists. What a time to be alive.
@robertthifault40808 сағат бұрын
Peterson is fairly cold.
@KrwiomoczBogurodzicy8 сағат бұрын
Cold humanism of the new atheists? “The worst kind of bias is the one that you’re not aware of.” - Steven Novella
@paulthepainter23668 сағат бұрын
Jordan has offered a home for bigots who can prove they aren't bigots with big word salad
@Daimo838 сағат бұрын
What are you talking about, theories about the unconscious have been talked about for over 120 years.
@vitae87008 сағат бұрын
@@paulthepainter2366 Bigot... another word that no longer has any meaning because of the left. The boy who cries wolf will be the next fairy tale that becomes reality.
@n00bly_437 сағат бұрын
A Materialist and a Mythologist go to a bar. Looking at his drink, the Mythologist says, “At once my dragon and my elixir of life!” The Materialist replies, “You drunk already? That’s obviously a whiskey!”
@antoniootero18396 сағат бұрын
And they’re both correct 😂
@johnblack92816 сағат бұрын
One is delusional @@antoniootero1839
@abefromen16 сағат бұрын
underrated comment
@I-am-Hrut5 сағат бұрын
@@antoniootero1839 Both are also "wrong" too. There is nothing meaningfully called "a whiskey" at either the extreme microscopic (quantum) or extreme macroscopic (cosmological) scales. Ultimately, all anthropocentric distinctions between things are "untrue". Peterson almost hit the nail on the head when he mentioned that at a very fundemental level all things are "one". This isn't entirely true. At that fundamental level all things aren't "one" but they are "zero". In Buddhism, we call this non-dualism and sunyata. This is intrinsic to our worldview regardless of denomination.
@KobeBeanMamba5 сағат бұрын
@@I-am-Hrutvery enlightening. I once had the realization on psychedelics, that if Reality is non-dualistic, and language is dualistic, then all words, philosophies, religions, etc are all hogwash. It’s the Buddhist koan of the finger pointing to the moon
@illuminatiCorgi8 сағат бұрын
I grew up reading Dawkins, and found Peterson as an adult. I am here for both of them.
@dixonsusa7 сағат бұрын
Exact same. Seems like there are many of us.
@Pastaface7 сағат бұрын
Me too. Have you readIian McGhilcrest? so helpful at uniting science with the metaphysical.
@bankiey7 сағат бұрын
Same, i seek that specific conciliation
@xxxneoxxx7 сағат бұрын
I'd be happy to call both my dad lol
@TjJd-f8m7 сағат бұрын
I'm here for neither, I'm here for the third person of this conversation that's not seen but more there then any of them
@nathanfranckhauser5 сағат бұрын
Alex's conversation with Jordan was way better and actually flowed.
@divelostmind6 сағат бұрын
This was good. The fact I felt actually invested and frustrated at times proves to me how good a conversation this was, and it highlighted important points.
@mlineberry257 сағат бұрын
These two could have a 10 part series, and I'd be all for it.
@themarcusnash133 сағат бұрын
Meh Dawkins was boring throughout just saying he isn’t interested a million times. It takes two for this thing to work and it seemed Peterson was trying hard to get Dawkins to participate.
@MT-zb7eg7 сағат бұрын
YEEEEES! Dawkins spoke to my ego during my young adult life...but now, older and "hopefully" wiser, Peterson speaks to my soul. Love them both, thank you for this wonderful discussion/debate
@Nobody-Nowhere7 сағат бұрын
I dont think you know what an ego is, and as there are no souls not sure what you are even talking about. You definitely did not grow wiser.
@TheJontydavid7 сағат бұрын
You sound just like every arrogant kid who reads his first book without picturs, only the ignorant can be so overconfident@Nobody-Nowhere
@Mamba4.87 сағат бұрын
@@Nobody-Nowhere The stupidity of your comment shows you have 0 wisdom So blinded by your bias against anything relating to spiritual matters, soul doesn't have to mean what you think. He's simply saying Peterson is speaking to his being, who we are psychotically. I'm sure the whole combo went right over your head. You can even see Dawkins light bulbs going off he's starting to understand Peterson take more and more. If you don't have a self, then why are you trying to even establish a point.
@toenuckles7 сағат бұрын
@@Nobody-Nowhere fool
@hansgie6737 сағат бұрын
Complete opposite for me.
@moonlightray84938 сағат бұрын
I love how Peterson and Dawkins have subconsciously pressured Alex into wearing a suit as well, lol
@MrStarnerd6 сағат бұрын
Very frustrating how Dr. Dawkins doesn’t engage in the arguments. Dr Peterson has been thinking about these things on a way deeper level. You can really see that he’s been sharpening that sword for a long long time.
@abefromen16 сағат бұрын
starting to think he is unable to
@stephenross32405 сағат бұрын
What’s even scarier is when you realise Dawkins in the position he’s in influencing others when he hasn’t even begun to think on the level of Peterson.
@brutalnoodles5 сағат бұрын
He'll be jailed when he returns in his home country, probably
@joek3604 сағат бұрын
I know religion has been a key feature of his work and lectures since maps of meaning, but when Peterson began talking about religion much more actively on his channel over the last few years I have continually struggled to listen. He’s sounded completely all over the place at times. This is by far the most coherent he has sounded in that time. His last talk with Dawkins was a bit of a car crash but this was very well done. As someone who loves the use of story to tell us the truth, when he dances around the literal truth of the book he does not help himself, in this discussion he gives a good answer which means people will actually listen to the next bit. Agree with you and others, Dawkins is great but he doesn’t acknowledge that regardless of scientific facts, there is a truth to mythology/stories that can be useful. Ruins aspects of the conversation.
@jasonzimmerer86584 сағат бұрын
I don’t understand what motivated Dawkins to join the show. He was “disinterested” in nearly everything.
@kylelay68584 сағат бұрын
Started with Dawkins/Harris. Graduated to Peterson. I attribute much of my adult transformation to Jordan’s teachings.
@jacobmaynor52337 сағат бұрын
This is my Super Bowl
@fullahel4537 сағат бұрын
Agreed!!!
@RaymondRAYCE7 сағат бұрын
Superb 🦉 Owl
@iamdanielmonroe6 сағат бұрын
Same!
@85yugs6 сағат бұрын
Watch any of the Lennox and Dawkins discussions if you haven't yet.
@vrossv5 сағат бұрын
Amen
@washutosh8 сағат бұрын
The first 25 minutes really highlight the difference in intellectual effort between Dr. Peterson and Dr. Dawkins. They're operating on two very different levels-Peterson is diving deep into metaphysics while Dawkins stays focused on facts and science. They’re not quite on the same wavelength. I wish Dawkins would engage more in exploration rather than asking interrogative questions, making it more of a dialogue.
@phetmoz8 сағат бұрын
Dawkins has a strong grasp of shallow concepts. Jordan has a strong grasp on deep concepts - which preceeds and necessitates a strong grasp on shallow concepts. You can't know what is deep without knowing what is shallow, but you can know shallow things without knowing the depths of the same thing.
@Fragallday7 сағат бұрын
I love this comment... that's exactly the frustration I feel while listening to their cain and abel dialogue
@ninjason577 сағат бұрын
Dawkins can't do that Because his worldview and mindset only allows itself to live within quantifiable reality. Even when JP attempts to bring the metaphysical world into that realm he refused it. Dawkins is a hypocrite. He doesn't care about truth.
@SaltyGrub14757 сағат бұрын
I thought it was unfair of Dawkins. It's the first thing that I picked up on. Jordan is very open to exploration and genuine dialogue, where it seems Dawkins had an axe to grind. I never read or watched Dawkins, but the way I seen this, was he was trying to place Peterson into a pinned down predetermined character he thought Jordan to be.
@ericbriggs73837 сағат бұрын
Spot on. This is what always makes these conversations so frustrating. I've noticed that people like Sam Harris and Dawkins only choose to dig as deep as is necessary for them to understand the world and thus function successfully within it. But what they don't understand is that not everyone is as high IQ as them and therefore the "Facts" that they know to be true aren't self-evident to everyone else. This is where Peterson's ideas have a much wider reach which has impacted many more people in a positive way.
@stfon57 сағат бұрын
Jordan Peterson is so physically active when speaking that he probably doesn't need the gym to stay trim.. Lol
@asfdadfgdasfh44447 сағат бұрын
All his activity still doesn't make him right?
@woodsmand5 сағат бұрын
@@asfdadfgdasfh4444 who said that?
@tenpennygrim58845 сағат бұрын
That and he eats zero carbs.
@MoveQuick44 сағат бұрын
@@asfdadfgdasfh4444 lol wtf, talk about starting an argument with something no one said.
@t2nexx5614 сағат бұрын
@@MoveQuick4 LOL fr
@ElderArms-fc9st6 сағат бұрын
What a brillaint discussion, JP showing intellectual capacity at his finest
@nicoperezcreative3 сағат бұрын
What a gift this was. Truly thank you all involved
@aGVTfilm9 сағат бұрын
Can we just appreciate that they spend ten minutes talking about dragons?
@ChristopherWaddelow8 сағат бұрын
😂
@adflicto18 сағат бұрын
lol
@iLastStar7 сағат бұрын
Lol
@toenuckles7 сағат бұрын
Lol
@AZx_03 сағат бұрын
...with two dinosaurs outside
@F33NXX7 сағат бұрын
I don't know what's more hilarious: that we immediately got stuck on "did Cain and Able exist," or that Dawkins seems to have projected his Atheism into Peterson's book, while reading, that he missed the part that in the Book of Genesis, it does say that. So "within the context of the story" Peterson is literally correct, so much for Dawkins being a literalist.
@timweber16956 сағат бұрын
I feel Dawkins is very surface level
@pauljohnson35846 сағат бұрын
Podcast Summary - Dawkins: You can't possibly believe [assertion of fact in purported historical record]. Peterson: I don't have to believe it for it to have value insofar as it gives man insight into himself. Dawkins: But that isn't truth as I narrowly define it because it doesn't advance scientific discovery. Peterson: Well, as a matter of documented history, if we don't apply the lessons of the purported historical record then our society will implode. Repeat ad nauseum
@dafunkmonster6 сағат бұрын
He’s only a literalist in so far as it serves as a tool to humiliate superstitious bumpkins.
@jonobnz75976 сағат бұрын
@@pauljohnson3584 Top summary. The archetypical character that Dawkins plays in the story of his own life does seem quite dull and boring, like its not balanced with reality. We live in a narrative world, that gets played out on top of a rational scientific factual layer.
@orionstar51835 сағат бұрын
@@jonobnz7597 but those two are still Separate tho ? That’s what I’m really confused about here all the people saying Dawkins can’t get over question I thought that was literally the point of getting them two together was to see where Peterson stands on this particular thing..
@asimhussain87168 сағат бұрын
I love that Alex, despite his audience despising Peterson and branding him as a "pseudo-intellect", actually respects him and his intellect enough to engage with him repeatedly in good faith.
@tmerk42928 сағат бұрын
Anyone who labels someone with JP's resume a "pseudo-intellect" probably just disagrees with something he's said and is too immature to call it that 😅
@stevejhkhfda8 сағат бұрын
does his audience despise Peterson? That sounds quite strong....I follow Alex and have a lot of appreciation for Peterson.
@asimhussain87168 сағат бұрын
@@stevejhkhfda Not all of them of course, I like Alex quite a bit. But he has a lot of the "new atheist" redditor types who never got over their "religion bad-pill" phase.
@mousedynasty49537 сағат бұрын
@@stevejhkhfdanot all of his audience does, but just look at Alex's video on deconstructing Jordan Peterson on religion (or something like that) and you can see the vast majority of comments being very negative towards JP.
@Scipionyxsam7 сағат бұрын
Well, he also knows that engaging with Peterson is good for clout. Alex has been pretty dismissive of Peterson's ideas himself when he wasn't arround.
@fernandoformeloza41075 сағат бұрын
"lion is gene; dragon is meme". That's a good quote, Alex. Well said
@MomentumCanada3654 сағат бұрын
I see a lack of desire from Hawkins of WANTING to go down to how deep Peterson has thought through these things.
@borneandayak67253 сағат бұрын
Because if he goes deep, he will find atheism as a dry and nonsensical religion.
@jon_doran7 сағат бұрын
It feels like Dawkins is in a box, while Jordan is emphatically explaining the box, the outside of the box, the foundations of the box, the room the box is in, the house that holds the room where the box is. Every time he tries to explain it, Dawkins is lost after the first sentence. Thankfully there is a meeting of minds closer to the end
@StopmotionStudios136 сағат бұрын
Thats because JP isnt afraid to operate on faith. Where Dawkins only operates on science. JP sees truths in religion. Sees them as good. Dawkins sees bad in religon. Sees them as cults. And once you die youll realize Dawkins was right.
@CrAzD6 сағат бұрын
This.
@gregorio8535 сағат бұрын
Exactly. Dawkins is concerned about the spoon on the table. Peterson notices the spoon on the table, but he also notices the furniture, the pattern of their arrangement, the particular room, the entire building, and the world beyond that. They're not even on the same level.
@MCharlesPainting5 сағат бұрын
Somebody commented that 'Richard is talking about paint, where Jordan is talking about the painting'. The issue is clearly deeper than that. Richard tries to make the case that the paint is more important than the painting, and the paint is what created the painting -- not seeing or refusing to admit that the artist made the painting by making use of the paint. In fact: the only reason the paint exists is because the artist wanted it. I read an art book not long ago, and a certain blue (lapis, I think, but maybe it was something else) around 1600 was worth more than gold. That should tell you something!
@alexforget4 сағат бұрын
Dawkins spend his life criticizing those who step outside the box, he is too much invested to even look.
@LangstonDev8 сағат бұрын
"I'm not interested in dragons," he says, with historically inaccurate tyrannosaurus rexes behind him, made me laugh
@99mm668 сағат бұрын
You mean the prehistoric creatures?
@dafunkmonster6 сағат бұрын
@@99mm66You sure they’re actually prehistoric? I mean, that’s a theory of course.
@dageustice5 сағат бұрын
@@dafunkmonster T. Rexes roaming the planet 65 million years ago is as factual and as real as this very comment you're reading right now. "It's just a theory" exposes more of your ignorance than you think.
@orionstar51835 сағат бұрын
@@dageustice exactly I think people Really really need to understand the difference between a theory and a hypothesis
@ClepsidraSideral4 сағат бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@BlackAtheistRants9 сағат бұрын
Oh lord let me sit and watch this with my popcorn 😂😂😂😂
@dimitriosfromgreece42278 сағат бұрын
Yes yes 😍😍😍😍😍😍
@Chelletryingtosmile8 сағат бұрын
Same 😂
@ChristopherWaddelow8 сағат бұрын
Indeed 😂
@johnowens53426 сағат бұрын
I've got cheeses and nuts because I do keto but I am right there with you.
@leandrocarg6 сағат бұрын
Dr. Peterson really brought home the discussion with the quantum mechanical analogy. Brilliant!
@leandrocarg4 сағат бұрын
I mean, what's the difference with truth derived from a fictional story that portrays an archetypical character and the sorts of truths (or predictions) we derive from asuming that reality conforms to a structure like an infinite dimensional complex Hilbert space. They're both models of reality.
@ginofactap3 сағат бұрын
no, that was one of his weakest analogies, given the complete lack of conversion between logical and metaphorical deductions. jungian archetypes as a consequence of baldwin effect, however, was a much more interesting and unexpected idea. really cleverly thought-out imo.
@goldenorbstudios6 сағат бұрын
I was coming out of Mormonism and preferred and agreed mostly with Jordan peterson. Now I'm fully out of the church and I agree and understand Dawkins much better. I think Jordan peterson is very smart and knows a lot of useful things. I think its good to hear the conversation.
@vayu13025 сағат бұрын
There is a channel called usefulcharts (Canadian jew, he studied theology) and it is an excellent resource to understand the history of religions. So, maybe it is good for understanding the religion you come from in a more neutral historical way. Then there are channels like metatron (he is a Italian historian) that are good to understand some aspects the catholic faith. Which could be another way to contrast it with which what you were taught. I think it matters a lot to take different approaches to this topic. Because it allows to understand the community you come from and to come to terms with it. All this topics are really complex. And they have different approaches.
@bluroguevyse087 сағат бұрын
I’m only at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="800">13:20</a> but it’s painfully obvious that Dawkins cares more about trivia than what matters. It’s like OCD or something. He can’t see the forest for the trees.
@Youttubeuser209327 сағат бұрын
You have to be hyperspecific to pin down JP while he tries to stir up confusion so that people can somehow rationalize their desire for him to not be an atheist, which is is.
@sababaratashvili86297 сағат бұрын
@@Youttubeuser20932 The issue is that was not the point of a debate to discuss Peterson's personal beliefs. Also, people's beliefs are complicated, some are stuck between being believers and agnostics or atheists.
@Paulog20037 сағат бұрын
Yeah it’s like he can’t see beyond earth
@TejanoTigre7 сағат бұрын
@@Youttubeuser20932it's such a dumb point to pin him on though. Dawkins comes off as pedantic and unserious. Yes, Peterson has a tendency to speak in word salad but it's not that hard to understand that he views the story of Cain as emblematic of a deeper truth about humanity.
@Youttubeuser209327 сағат бұрын
@@sababaratashvili8629 There is no explicit purpose to this debate, so any topic that arises is fair game, unless one party wishes to refuse to discuss it. JP could say "im not comfortable discussing my personal beliefs" and leave it at that, but he cooses to bs his way into convincing his fans that hes actually a christian
@54m0h77 сағат бұрын
Dawkins' thinking will get us to the Moon. Peterson's thinking help us understand why we wanted to go in the first place.
@samyakjain7276 сағат бұрын
Nice analogy but I would perhaps say that the closeminded-ness of Dawkins would probably translate to poor science. As even scientists must maintain flexibility in their thinking. In project management, I could easily see him becoming something of an egomaniac, shrouded in his own dogma, and not allowing creativity and free thinking (which science needs!) to develop. JP will at least hear you out, as long he deems your ideas well put-together enough in their own right
@averageds3player6996 сағат бұрын
And not kill each other before we do so
@mr.teyeJr6 сағат бұрын
brilliantly put
@notbrad48735 сағат бұрын
Now bring in Ben Shapiro's thinking to explain why going to the moon is perhaps not the best use of our money when we could instead send it to Israel
@MCharlesPainting5 сағат бұрын
@@notbrad4873 Typical anti-Jewish sadness. Ben is famously pro-Moon landing and pro-America crushing the world in general. He just also thinks that having mindless terrorist Muslims controlling the Near East and wiping out every Jew is maybe immoral and unwise for both American and global interests. Have you seen Israel? They're the world-leaders in many areas of science right now, if nothing else. You should compare Israel to even parts of Europe, which are not worth much on these grounds. I don't see you supporting the removal of Poland or Thailand at all. Maybe you would if leftists or Islam invaded? Or is this issue purely with the Jews for you? Note: If you see the video Ben just did, he literally said that the best case for Israel is not on Biblical or racial grounds or otherwise, it's simply what would be best for the region: Israel or mindless terrorists? Very easy choice, unless you know something I don't about the moral worth and hidden genius of Hamas members? I'll wait.
@mayank782078 сағат бұрын
Alex's moustache is the sinister offspring of an archetype and a meme, roughly speaking.
@leostromberg11847 сағат бұрын
LMFAO
@nyChannel097 сағат бұрын
funny but useless, thank you sir
@ragingsilence76 сағат бұрын
That really cracked me up, man!!!
@RyderSpearmann6 сағат бұрын
Moderator of the century! Alex, you rock.
@odysseynoone38316 сағат бұрын
Richard and Alex literally looked like MI6 agents interrogating a foreign spy. When Alex said "You must understand what you're being asked here." that was like a scene from the Imitation Game
@Odin_88907 сағат бұрын
oh my god Jordan, this is the most incredible conversation i've ever listened too thank you for arranging this and so fluently expressing yourself, its incredible to listen to your mind come out, and to see the beauty inside it profound, moving, inspirational, honest to the core, genuinely beautiful stuff Jordan, your a gift to our species. Thank you !
@MelissaGilmerSalamanca7 сағат бұрын
I very much appreciate Alex being the moderator of this conversation. He is very skilled at keeping things on track, helping clarify Jordan, and diffusing some of the more contentious comments by Richard. Great conversation.
@nicolasbascunan40137 сағат бұрын
He's still a nihilist, a moral relativist.
@leodii64416 сағат бұрын
@@nicolasbascunan4013what does that even remotely have anything to do with the comment or the video here?
@Sreerags59594 сағат бұрын
@@nicolasbascunan4013 He's also moderating a conversation between two of the most famous thinkers/articulators/publishers of our time. Clearly, they both appreciate him enough to make this possible, and moral relativism wasn't a yardstick there.
@cbogue4188 сағат бұрын
Summary: Biologist wants to prioritise the quantitative, Psychologist wants to prioritise the qualitative.
@ericbriggs73837 сағат бұрын
Well put. I was gonna frame it similarly Summary: Is vs Ought
@samyakjain7276 сағат бұрын
Slow clap. That's basically it. They both come off as frustrated/frustrating in this interview, but I think Peterson won on heart. He also has more of an open mind to Dawkins than vice versa. Dawkins is just rigid and patronising. Not a fan of his style
@dafunkmonster6 сағат бұрын
@@samyakjain727He’s also not even persuasive when being hyper-literal. For example, the absence of consecutive manuscript revisions is not proof that a story was not developed iteratively. For Dawkins to imply such a thing is absurd. Manuscripts decay. Humans didn’t always write things down. Even the manuscripts we value tend to get lost, burn, get eaten. And revised manuscripts would be more valuable than their predecessors.
@ben02985 сағат бұрын
@samyakjain727 He talks down to people like they're idiots for even contemplating creation/god/supernatural etc. His discussion with Ayaan hirsi ali was similar.
@connorheath4923 сағат бұрын
This might be the best clearest I’ve ever heard Jordan express his ideas. And this is the perfect conversation for it!
@JoelGamonez-ez4lt6 сағат бұрын
“I think you have to think about it hierarchically” - one of the most Petersonian quotes out there
@scratch577 сағат бұрын
Peterson strides across the beach, taking in the view, expressing gratitude while Dawkins sits still counting grains of sand in the demand of proof that the beach is there.
@neilburns32206 сағат бұрын
Well put. I know what type of beach experience I want to have in life
@ronanwalsh21706 сағат бұрын
An excellent way of characterizing this, nice one 😎
@petrucatalin906 сағат бұрын
To the top with you, sir!
@samyakjain7276 сағат бұрын
About 15-20m in so far. Dawkins is exhausting in his inability to grasp metaphor. I think he's trying to pin Jordan Peterson down as not being a devout Creationist, which may have (some) merit in examining his stance on the factfulness of religion. But doing so erases the imbued and constructed meaning *of* religion. He is just cold and stubborn. And I think Alex kind of kisses his ass here
@SaviorMoney-7776 сағат бұрын
@@samyakjain727 Alex still has a ways to go himself.
@Archeidos-Arcana7 сағат бұрын
Massive respect to Alex for being so gracious and respectable despite having an audience that is quite the opposite.
@zpotler8 сағат бұрын
My favorite of Peterson is when he’s with a contentious opponent. I hope we get more in the future
@carlosgarciahernandez72396 сағат бұрын
This conversation was absolutely incredible. Especially towards the end. I'm so thankful Alex was there to moderate too.
@craigrelyea91464 сағат бұрын
Alex's interjection at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="3390">56:30</a> is exactly what needed to be said. Profound observation
@Thomasthechoochoo7 сағат бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="2589">43:09</a> this part of the debate is some of the best I’ve heard from Jordan Peterson.
@patricksampsonmusic6 сағат бұрын
Nailed it!
@DrWolves6 сағат бұрын
Very profound, indeed.
@Jakeross1235 сағат бұрын
Yep that was incredible. Dawkins: “that doesn’t impress me” 🙄
@t2nexx5614 сағат бұрын
I was gonna say this as well he absolutely murdered that part
@patricksampsonmusic4 сағат бұрын
He was on fire this WHOLE discussion!
@dylanvellut9 сағат бұрын
- Facts dont care about your feelings - Jokes on you, feelings dont care about facts either
@ninjason578 сағат бұрын
true, but the end result of following one vs the other can be success or destruction.
@paulthepainter23668 сағат бұрын
Fact: Jordan Peterson is a bigot
@MrMajsterixx8 сағат бұрын
@@ninjason57 maybe the answer is to have balance between those two
@NamelessKing15977 сағат бұрын
@@ninjason57 Not really, feelings are the reason we seek fact, and facts are the reason we have feelings.
@ninjason577 сағат бұрын
@@NamelessKing1597 I'm not claiming they don't coexist. My claim is that only following feelings while ignoring facts leads to more destruction than the opposite.
@tomt91947 сағат бұрын
This is honestly one of the best discussions I've ever seen. It's absolutely fascinating how there is a common theme between Memes and Jungian Archetypes.
@nickaguilar40075 сағат бұрын
I like when Dawkins said “Whenever you see a really complicated, beautifully DESIGNED piece of biology…” 😂. Granted, he wasn’t trying to make the point that anything biological is literally designed, but it was fun catching him say the word.
@MovieMaker13027 сағат бұрын
It's so weird that this discussion reflects the struggle I carry with me since I started venturing into science
@DanSmith01ave8 сағат бұрын
Thank you Alex O'Connor for facilitating this conversation. I saw you interview Richard Dawkins in Oxford this evening and you always bring a healthy dose of civility, balance as well as respectful challenge to these conversations. Thanks to Jordan and Richard for having this dialogue and for the work you do in your respective fields. I really should refrain from watching this until my essay is finished....we'll see...
@borneandayak67253 сағат бұрын
Its funny to see atheist with civility and respectful behavior. They disguise like a religious people.
@iamseekingtheway7 сағат бұрын
What a time to be alive. Definitively fascinating conversation.
@kevinross62358 сағат бұрын
Dawkins: "You are changing the subject" Peterson: "No, I don't think so. I may be leaping outside of the topic a bit" This part gave me a chuckle ngl
@99mm668 сағат бұрын
It's a metaphorical truth you stupid fuck!!!
@edwinsolis57108 сағат бұрын
He was basically going to bring it back to Dawkin’s valuing Christianity over Islam as an answer to Dawkin’s question over Christianity’s value.
@zarbins8 сағат бұрын
Dawkins has no ability to think laterally, openly, or associatively and it's why he continually cannot comprehend what Peterson is getting at. Actually, Dawkins, Peterson is not changing the subject he is illustrating an point, providing an example, and tying it back to the subject.
@jakobjas42127 сағат бұрын
Peterson has trouble making his point without going round the houses for 10 minutes first.
@kevinross62357 сағат бұрын
@@jakobjas4212Seems so. Reminds me of people who refuse to define what a woman is
@BenjaminBowmanlive5 сағат бұрын
How anyone thinks Dawkins is some sort of brilliant mind that is deserving of any recognition or attention is insane to me.
@Thomasthechoochoo7 сағат бұрын
Why does Richard just say “it doesn’t impress me” and dismiss everything. I wish he would have engaged in this conversation more because frankly I think Jordan was the only one playing ball in this “debate” ( Alex was great btw)
@CaptainSurfy6 сағат бұрын
He doesn’t want to play on a field he can’t win on. It’s very clear Jordan is less closed minded. His depth in concepts is proof
@Thomasthechoochoo4 сағат бұрын
@@CaptainSurfy I agree 💯
@suppression21427 сағат бұрын
Wow I am in utter shock amazing job by Peterson here I have never seen such a precise argument from him.
@crazyalarmstudios20126 сағат бұрын
He’s gotten much better over the years. He used to do terribly in debates. Here, he’s great.
@patricksampsonmusic4 сағат бұрын
He was on fire for sure. This was incredible on his part!
@kapeeshpoddar79768 сағат бұрын
Nice conversation between Peterson, Dawkins and British slave owner from 1800’s.
@AdamSmith-de5oh6 сағат бұрын
😂
@electricelephant74713 сағат бұрын
Would have to be the first 7 years.
@PortalOfAwesome7 сағат бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1485">24:45</a> An absolutely masterfully timed ad break. Perhaps the best one I've ever seen.
@garybuck65356 сағат бұрын
It will be studied for ages lol
@moonscore6 сағат бұрын
Great admiration for all parties involved in this discussion. It was amusing that, around the 42 minute mark, Dawkins began, in a way, mythologizing to subordinate the exercise of mythology. What I mean by that is this: he recounted the age of the earth, history of life, the trajectory of scientific conquest and discovery - not as dispassionate data, but he imbued the data with implicit metanarrative by virtue of his delivery. That counts as mythology, in a broader sense.
@gloifti6 сағат бұрын
Having pursued graduate studies in religion, it was my experience that both Eliade and Neumann.were only taught to be critique as antiscientific ideologues. Peterson deserves much credit for promoting their work along with that of Jung and also, Dostoyevsky!
@99mm668 сағат бұрын
After watching this the second time, I have come to the conclusion that JP is right about Dragons, Dawkins is right about Genes and Cosmic Skeptic is right about Memes. Truly inspiring!
@VeryGreenPanda7 сағат бұрын
I want the world to have more conversations of people like this
@loganc63337 сағат бұрын
The winner of this debate is Alex’s mustache
@DSWoodworkUSA4 сағат бұрын
I've been thanking God for a lot of things lately. This being free to watch... Thank God for that
@edwardshine68437 сағат бұрын
I think Peterson’s frustration about questions of the sort “did a virgin gave birth to Jesus ..” comes from the place that he really wants to believe in the scripture , yet stays agnostic at the core. I respect him very much, I just wish for him to make the final leap
@n8sfolly6 сағат бұрын
I think He doesn't actually believe there is a meaningful difference in believing in the story, or that it may have been a real event.
@antoniootero18396 сағат бұрын
I actually came to the realization recently that he does this so that he can speak outside of the confines of being a Christian, as a Christian myself, it would be very hard for him to have these conversations if he was known to be a Christian, because how then could he argue from a perspective of intellectual curiosity rather than religious revelation. For example if Dawkins asked him “did Cain and Abel really exist?” He would either have to give a heretical response, or give the Christian answer and people like Dawkins would dismiss him, because they often dismiss metaphysics as a whole.
@AdolfoAstudillo-w2z6 сағат бұрын
I disagree. I think it is just that the literalists approach is awfully boring and lead to a quick dead end. It is shallow and, as Jordan says, silly questions. And I agree. I've not finished listening to this video, but Dawkins so far has been awfully dense and frustratingly slow in helping to move the conversation forward. I wonder if Dawkins when reading a book, instead of caring for the story, analyses de colours, spacing and shapes of the letters.
@averageds3player6996 сағат бұрын
Also he doesn't want to turn off atheist audience, you would want them to stay and listen too, no?
@pixieseyz4 сағат бұрын
JBP appears to be playing both sides. Like a charlatan would do. Dawkins has principle based on reason.
@iulia.bianca.b7 сағат бұрын
Although I am a fan of Dr. Richard Dawkins and an atheist, I'm an even bigger fan of Dr. Jordan Peterson and I LOVE his arguments, even though I do not believe in a god. It's truly incredible to hear Dr. Peterson so masterfully defending his arguments.
@Paul-zu2hf7 сағат бұрын
Agreed, Dawkins and the atheist types are so utterly uninspiring.
@johnowens53426 сағат бұрын
On one side in the beginning God made all and on the other side in the beginning nothing made all.
@painlord2k6 сағат бұрын
Maybe you don't believe in a god but you believe in his Word?
@gregorio8536 сағат бұрын
Exactly. I'm not convinced on the God front, but Peterson's ideas are so profound and helpful that it wouldn't be ridiculous to suggest he's one of the greatest minds of our time. Dawkins, on the other hand, while a great biologist, offers little to no value outside his field of expertise. And even there, I don't think he's exactly earth shattering.
@Paul-zu2hf6 сағат бұрын
@@gregorio853 the last 30 minutes showed how one dimensional Dawkins is. He wasn't in the conversation. He simply wasn't playing.
@HAPPYJOETV7 сағат бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="2016">33:36</a> Dawkinssss mannnn Literature captures humanity and it is true to the degree in which it resonates!!!
@nicolasbascunan40137 сағат бұрын
In relation to memes: for Peterson, a new influential artistic wave would be a manifestation of the logos, while for Dawkins, it is a social phenomenon not different from a virus
@AB-eq9mm6 сағат бұрын
It’s so disconcerting putting so many ads on a discussion like this 😂
@nicolasvitale51516 сағат бұрын
Dr. Peterson’s intellect is light years ahead of Dawkin’s
@dayperthedisciple5 сағат бұрын
I couldn’t agree more, Dawkins has nothing new to bring or say.
@UniverseSpeck5 сағат бұрын
I don’t think that’s fair. Dawkins is a smart man. He’s just ideological.
@TobiasRieper-jx9lq8 сағат бұрын
This is the sort of healthy conversation we need, Dr Peterson. Three bloody legends.
@samyakjain7276 сағат бұрын
Healthy ?? He looked like he was having an aneurysm. The content was fascinating (from what I've seen) but I don't this is his most composed or relaxed state
@conorjuurlink59757 сағат бұрын
This is the super bowl of public intellectuals
@wakkablockablaw60257 сағат бұрын
This is why JP is easily the greatest intellectual of our generation. No close second. Who else can reach across the aisle and have productive conversations to this extent? I don't care if you strongly disagree with JP, you have to give the man his flowers.
@StopmotionStudios136 сағат бұрын
I hope that any serieus professor is able to have a productive conversation with the other side. Thats like the bare minimum haha
@autumnleaves27666 сағат бұрын
He was in great form here, wasn't he ? I feel uplifted when I listen to JBP, as well as enlightened and informed. Two men here whose minds are not on the same wavelength but were finding some slightly more common ground near the end.
@CaptainSurfy6 сағат бұрын
Dude Jordan is miles above the others it’s clear
@StopmotionStudios136 сағат бұрын
@CaptainSurfy Jordans mind is much more erratic then Dawkins. Dont confuse that with genius.
@wakkablockablaw60256 сағат бұрын
@@StopmotionStudios13 They are very hard to find these days. No one does it like JP. He even talks to thought leaders in almost every discipline. No one has gone as far as him in this pursuit. His YT channel is basically an intellectually diverse library.
@ead6306 сағат бұрын
It is good and remarkable how much Alex O'Connor has ascended and has respect by pure virtue of intellectual honesty
@TheSteppenwolf776 сағат бұрын
I find it funny how Peterson immediately converts into a French postmodernist philosopher when asked direct questions about his favorite structure of belief
@vincentfalcone92186 сағат бұрын
Yet goes full on Jesus freak when hanging out with religious right wingers. Definitely a chameleon concerned with maintaining his fanbase.
@pineapplesandthegovernment65227 сағат бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1633">27:13</a> When you get rejected on the 3rd date but need to make it sound classy.
@sullman128 сағат бұрын
Peterson best channel on KZbin rn
@streglof9 сағат бұрын
Right before I was going to bed. Thanks. Haha.
@Sacrifice.Online.for.Offline8 сағат бұрын
go to sleep plz
@tylere.84368 сағат бұрын
Listen to it while you sleep
@Sacrifice.Online.for.Offline8 сағат бұрын
@@tylere.8436 gay
@DarwinsLab6 сағат бұрын
Alex thanks for taking part in this, I thought you did a phenomenal job Mediating
@dreidyoussef62613 сағат бұрын
Thanks to all the DW team that made that happen
@KevinEdwardAnderson6 сағат бұрын
One of the most direct and profound statements that I have read from Jordan Peterson -- which underpins his entire thesis -- went something like this: "You can think of the world as a place of facts. You can also think of the world as a place in which to act." For me, this largely summarizes the entire space between the perspective of a Dawkins and that of Peterson. To say that religion is, historically speaking, the investigation of how to act, whereas science is the exploration of facts. Human beings HAD to figure out how to act before they figured out what was empirically "fact" is a difficult statement to challenge. Early in the interview, Dawkins says he doesn't care about symbols or myths, he's "interested in facts." I think the question there is -- What do you mean you don't care? You might be more intrigued and more interested in the facts of the matter, as it were... but the way you carry yourself is almost certainly so deeply routed in a perspective formed by millennia of human beings who were, at the time, learning how to act much more so than they were analyzing "facts." Great to have this conversation, and Alex O'Connor was a welcome moderator.
@camerondeans90568 сағат бұрын
92 minutes of frustration and talking at cross-purposes coming up! And yet I know I'm still going to watch every minute of it 😂
@martinburrows68447 сағат бұрын
You dont get it.... No, you don't get it.. Etc 😂
@pauljohnson35846 сағат бұрын
Dawkins: You can't possibly believe [assertion of fact in purported historical record]. Peterson: I don't have to believe it for it to have value insofar as it gives man insight into himself. Dawkins: But that isn't truth as I narrowly define it because it doesn't advance scientific discovery. Peterson: Well, as a matter of documented history, if we don't apply the lessons of the purported historical record then our society will implode. Repeat.
@AFringedGentianToEnnien8 сағат бұрын
I’m so happy you got to have this time with Dr. Dawkins, dearest Dr. Peterson, I know how long you have been looking forward to it and how much you have worked to prepare for it. I was just thinking how well you look, your color is so good and your eyes are so bright and full of light, and I hope that you are feeling as well as you are looking. It looks to me that you thrived on this conversation and that is so much what I wanted for you. I can’t tell you how much. Here is a gentle hug And Ruth Anne’s love ❤
@billtittle78976 сағат бұрын
I’m here for both..all three actually…to me, and I’m nobody but Peterson continually dodges the questions with answers I think most people don’t understand which gives him a pass..I’ll listen but always skeptical when he has conversations with “the atheist type”..both are smarter than me. Thanks to all three
@LoganKM4 сағат бұрын
HUGE props and congratulations to Alex for putting himself into a position to be able to participate in and moderate a discussion between these two geniuses. As someone who is very close to Alex in age, I've gotta say that this is a huge inspiration to me. Well done all around.
@ConnorTaylor178 сағат бұрын
Dawkins is drunk on facts
@samyakjain7276 сағат бұрын
He's so insufferable .. I admire strong intellects, and even strong characters. But lack of humility or openness to other's opinion is not right. And actually antithetical to the nature of 'good science'
@theobiggs66115 сағат бұрын
@@samyakjain727he's a bore
@pixieseyz4 сағат бұрын
Facts matter.
@sarshanden80333 сағат бұрын
@@pixieseyz Facts generated by who?
@jordancrow97607 сағат бұрын
Man of Science, Man of Faith.
@andrewdurand31817 сағат бұрын
Two men of faith. Both using science.
@StopmotionStudios136 сағат бұрын
@andrewdurand3181 Nope. Dawkins whole thing is basing arguments on science without faith. Jordan tries to combine them. His comment is fair.
@vngelicath15805 сағат бұрын
@StopmotionStudios13 His faith is in scien(tism).
@AlanZornOfficial8 сағат бұрын
Whoever chose Alex as the mediator knows what he is doing. Congratulations I believe he is the perfect candidate.
@karolakkolo1238 сағат бұрын
I think he chose himself haha and proposed the idea to both of them
@ebc95763 сағат бұрын
This may be the most important and needed conversation in our lifetime. I would hope to see it continue into more areas of the different perspective. I'm no fan of Dawkins, nor am I impressed by him. But I am grateful for this conversation