Aristotle - Politics - Full Unabridged Audiobook

[@Michael_______]

Thank the people down below for making this easy. Book 1 00:00:05 Book 2 00:50:40 Book 3 02:09:07 Book 4 03:26:53 Book 5 4:38:48 Book 6 6:04:28 Book 7 6:37:44 Book 8 7:50:13 🏺🏺🏺🏺🏺🏺🏺

[@TheLockon00]

God bless you, sir.

[@Michael_______]

@@TheLockon00 thanks man. He has in many ways.

[@hectorparks8618]

you are a king!

[@otter3193]

@@hectorparks8618 no no thats monarchy

[@gregbuescher5367]

@@TheLockon00 q+c

[@7th7andwich]

I like the way this is narrated. It feels like a lecturer speaking, not someone just reading a book. Much easier to absorb.

[@mwaliahmed10]

More credit to Aristotle’s style of writing and was a lecturer

[@Mageroeth]

No it doesnt this sounds like total ass.

[@hunterkudo9832]

The narrator is Matthew Josdal. You're welcome.

[@ttacking_you]

Dude reading this deserves a Grammy.

[@hunterkudo9832]

The narrator is Matthew Josdal. You're welcome.

[@arvidjaekel]

Book 1 00:00:05 Book 2 00:50:40 Book 3 02:09:07 Book 4 03:26:53

[@manuelchelo2407]

Thank you

[@danie-v2o]

Thanks dude 📚☕👍

[@bradwalton3977]

Thanks!

[@flyingmantis-u9u]

Book 7 06:37:42

[@trench01]

The end got cut which the rest is "such as the Lydian above all others appears to be, which is suited to children of tender age, and possesses the elements both of order and of education. Thus it is clear that education should be based upon three principles- the mean, the possible, the becoming, these three. "

[@Michael_______]

Thanx

[@johnmilius3031]

So in fact, it wasn't "Full Unabridged" 😄

[@LucasMrWatkins]

Book 1 - 00:00:05 Book 2 - 00:50:40 Book 3 - 02:09:07 Book 4 - 03:26:53 Book 5 - 4:38:48 Book 6 - 6:04:28 Book 7 - 6:37:44

[@unnanointedonesufi]

Thanks

[@perropajuo]

Book 8 - 7:50:13

[@casard5235]

I'm about 2/3 through and get the sense that there was a lot political wrangling, infighting, usurping in his days. Yep, history is still repeating itself. Will listening to Aristotle's histories help us prevent them from repeating. Still a work in progress.

[@danny91pr]

It blows my mind that this was written thousands of years ago yet the ideas still very relevant today. I think it speaks to the genius of Aristotle but it also speaks to the fact that politics are an intrinsic part of human nature

[@jameseldridge3445]

Correct. Human nature never changes and never will

[@노선혜-l3t]

I cannot agree more.

[@노선혜-l3t]

Agree but circumstances have been changed. Tech in particular experdites how we think and what we believe in etc. It's the era of what makes a human humans. 😊

[@노선혜-l3t]

To ponder upon....

[@K050VA]

Shqipe thank you for posting this Don’t know if you narrate it but if you did awesome work 👏

[@talytasbarcelos]

Best reader ever!!!💛

[@lashageorgian838]

Thank you for the Audiobook.

[@politicalphilosophy-thegre3894]

Thanks a lot for posting this. Hope that more people in the world will become aware of what Political Philosophy is, and it will be included in the curriculums in education systems soon.

[@jeremyharris2980]

I'm more of the Socratic school of thought but as such being the case I must be subject to opposition

[@unbrnwsh]

This video explains the current system in the USA better than most other explanations. For those who won't have the time to listen to the whole video giving it the full attention it deserves please listen at least from 3.5 min to 4.5 min, if that cannot be done then begin at 4.02 and listen to the next few minutes.

[@andreagomera]

It's good to listen out first and strive to understand/comprehend it.

[@Michael_______]

@@andreagomera I was just telling someone. Listen in bursts. One or two books a week at once.

[@ShadowGricken]

Dude what the fuck are you talking about

[@coreyt.rogers9376]

Aristotle my favorite philosopher of all time. Why? his work broadens my perspective of life in general. I find it incredible that most of his ideas are still relevant and can be applied in present times. Not to mention he mentored Alexander The Great...

[@benjaminwalker7793]

I currently study Philosophy at A level, I wasn't given this as an assignment I just want to hear Aristotle's point of view having heard that of Locke, Bentham and Berkeley (amongst others). so far I think I'm stuck between Aristotle and Mill

[@dariusmaiuga9442]

Yeah slaves are natural mate. This guys a fucking joke

[@lorenzodavidsartormaurino413]

@@dariusmaiuga9442 You can't such an idiot

[@jerrygutierrez99]

Darius Maiuga shut up pussy

[@AxmedBahjad]

Politics with a good narration.

[@hunterkudo9832]

The narrator is Matthew Josdal. You're welcome.

[@bammaksenlat2244]

This issimply wonderful.

[@ericb1633]

Thank you so much for this upload! So much better than the AI versions on here

[@olegtalanin5325]

I don't understand why there are dislikes on this video. It's an audiobook, relax.

[@KlaudioMarashithemasterishome]

Steve TheGreat absolutely agreed

[@glr]

Too fast to understand for me.

[@glr]

Yeah, the pace of delivery leaves no room for me to contemplate what I'm hearing.

[@BRockandriffs]

Gamelore You can slow down the playback speed if you want. Or pause when a cogent point is made.

[@BlindRambler]

Xavier Smith no. The point of the audio book is dependent on the “reader”. I can’t read the text sometimes. I have no problem pausing if needed.

[@nickklein8163]

Thank you for this. Great audiobook.

[@Laocoon283]

My favorite quote of his is "...even in a woman or a slave though the one is inferior and the other a wholly worthless being." - Aristotle

[@sobkovladimir5]

- Поскольку , как мы видим, всякое государство представляет собой своего рода общение, организуется ради какого-либо блага, то, очевидно, все общения стремятся к тому или иному благу, причем больше других и к высшему из всех благ стремится то общение, которое является наиболее важным из всех и обнимает собой все остальные общения. Это общение и называется государством или общением политическим. - Только те государственные устройства, которые имеют в виду общую пользу, являются правильными; имеющие же в виду только благо правящих - все ошибочны и представляют собой отклонения от правильных: они основаны на началах господства, а государство есть общение свободных людей. - Отклонения от правильных устройств следующие: от царской власти - тирания, от аристократии - олигархия , от политии - демократия. Тирания - монархическая власть, имеющая в виду выгоды одного правителя; олигархия блюдет выгоды состоятельных граждан; демократия - выгоды неимущих; общей же пользы ни одна из них в виду не имеет.

[@patrickconnelly9767]

While audio books are handy and quite convenient, Google has made all Aristotle's literary work free on Google books. Very cool.

[@narratorisaiahlawsonsaudio5505]

Much appreciation for this audiobook

[@aminekalakhi4793]

Thank you very much for this audio version. It is perfect. Can you get Orientalism by Edward Said in audio form?

[@michaelsmith-ht2jy]

He is a beast or a god . That tells us all . We are gods, yet in civilisation we are sheep 🙏🏽Asé oh

[@jonatasmachado7217]

Aristotle is impressive. He keeps pointing to Aristo (noble) telos (ends)

[@Vectivuss]

The first 20 minutes has so many good qoutes

[@camilamariaquesadarodemann5955]

Book 1 Chapter 1 00:00:05 Chapter 2 00:01:47

[@camilamariaquesadarodemann5955]

Chapter 12 00:42:49

[@zeinakiwan72]

Life is beautiful, cause it is a creation of art, art of getting wealth, art of living, that means we are depressed cause we lack the art of living..

[@donaldtimpson4320]

To ANYONE who is familiar with Aristotle - I am attempting to "learn Aristotle's philosophies", and would be very grateful for a recommended list of works, and the recommended order to read them, and any recommended pre-reading. I have read in preparation The Republic, Crito, Phaedo, The Symposium, and the one where Socrates presents his idea that learning is recollection and demonstrates it with a slave (can't recall at the moment). To who ever bothers to help me, THANK YOU!

[@drugbrala6083]

+Donald Timpson I'd recommend the Nicomachean Ethics. It's fun and useful.

[@hektordelarge1364]

get the translations by benjamin jowett or just reading "the philosophy of aristotle"would be good. its basically a collection of the highlights of his work

[@hektordelarge1364]

u started rightly by begining with plato

[@freudianslip2534]

The dialogue that you can’t remember the name of is called “Meno”

[@drugbrala6083]

It's so weird hearing Aristotle argue that slavery is natural and expedient.

[@hektordelarge1364]

he comes from a different time

[@hektordelarge1364]

the ancient. greeks did alot of fucked up shit to themselves

[@gummipalle]

+Petar Pajevic On the other hand, here we are, still listening... And looking back, slavery was expedient, wasnt it? It built ALL the empires still adored today, from ancient egypt to the USA... And it seems natural,- since all cultures have slaves, independant of each other.... Scandinavian, south american, chinese....

[@hektordelarge1364]

Necessary evils

[@spankyspork5808]

Slavery still exists today, it's just disguised. It's ingrained in human nature, as Aristotle observed.

[@phycogsmithomniscience309]

its crazy how his views relate to the free market. The free market was the solution to have men work without being slaves.. ,but voluntary servants for pay...I wonder what Aristotle would have said in a time where men can choose to make a business.. and others who didn't want to put up the front effort to make a business or didn't.. inherit the business of their fathers , to choose to be a laborer... as todays times a laborer is in fact a voluntary servant.. the moral thing of this ofcourse is you have the free will to choose this . whats creepy about this is I thought Aristotle was a free will philosopher .. hes arguing that you were born to be great or born to be a servant .. the sad thing about this.. is this utterly appears to be in reality . geniuses build companies and lesser inteligence work for those companies.. and there is no way around this.. we tried this with communism and like 200million people died.. I guess the one thing man can't beat is their own nature even tho they can beat other nature itself... its ironic. sad and functional .. damn it Aristotle such a rationalist hits you hard with the truth deep in your core.. its fucking sad, but true.. wow.. atleast we ended slavery... but damn it the servant will always exist and the business owner too and ending those... is too much of a cost .

[@S_Warden]

Book 8: 7:50:13 - 8:09:16

[@benjaminmusic184]

Thank you

[@BrightyAlbo]

Faleminderit 🇦🇱

[@TeskedBajs]

"50 Philosophy Classics: Thinking, Being, Acting, Seeing, Profound Insights and Powerful Thinking from Fifty Key Books" plz

[@KlaudioMarashithemasterishome]

Yes, we can upload this one as well. It will be available within the end of this week.

[@KlaudioMarashithemasterishome]

Your video was uploaded . Enjoy

[@TeskedBajs]

Klaudio Marashi Thank you very much!

[@truthfinder6996]

Book 2 50:38

[@adamrosenfeld9384]

Book 3 @ 2:09:07

[@Missrena1000]

Which is book 6

[@UserName-nx6mc]

book 4 @ 3:26:53

[@UserName-nx6mc]

book 5 @ 4:38:48

[@UserName-nx6mc]

book 6 - 6:04:28

[@riverbedflower7498]

Hi, I would like to know who's translation this is. It seems more clear than the one I bought. I bought Carnes Lord's translation. Would you mind saying which version are you reading?

[@amellirizarry9503]

13:05 Aristotle's pitch for slavery starting around here

[@dogfilms7753]

Book 1 ch 2 1:48 Ch 5 13:04

[@dogfilms7753]

Bk 1 ch 6 17:30

[@riverbedflower7498]

When he says there is a writer who preceded him who maintains that democracy is the worst of perverted governments instead of tyranny, what writer does he mean?

[@drugbrala6083]

+RiverBed Flower Plato argued extensively against democracy.

[@riverbedflower7498]

Thank you very much!

[@Abaddonian]

socrates

[@Samael16661]

Plato criticised the tyranny as the worst form of government. I don't know who he is talking about.

[@annaLee-uh1xz]

What version is this? Like, who was the person who translated it?

[@stellario82]

Amazing, thanks!

[@politicalphilosophy-thegre3894]

Thanks a lot again.

[@moirangthemvishalsingh]

i was intrested in this but ....i did not have time and resource...but this is great

[@casard5235]

Formative observations and today is the 2024 U. S. election. I wonder how many of the politicians studied this book.

[@sarahrakoia8634]

Book 8 7:50:15

[@Kinging76]

group of people wrote it few years ago about current world situation and claiming it to be by Aristotle

[@Laocoon283]

Doesn't matter who wrote it though all that matters is the content.

[@coolchannel44]

6:57:00 and 7:00:00

[@Jeremy-xk5mv]

Part 7 21:21

[@riverbedflower7498]

What does he mean when he says Arcadian way of life?

[@goosecap4706]

simple and rural

[@goosecap4706]

Primordial

[@badlove6896]

which translation is this?

[@543atomic]

Book 2:09:05

[@tonylou8906]

book 4.11 4:06:00

[@josephlambert4104]

Good read. Even to the easilly bord.

[@dominik8642]

I thought he was a good philosopher but saying that slavery is natural is completely absurd

[@jameseldridge3445]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/e4XPZGSMhayVnZo

[@NightKnight347]

Did you even pay attention to what was said, or did you just stop at the knee jerk emotional reaction to hearing a single English translation in the 21st century? Ask what the terms mean, how they are to be understood, where are the premises, how do the premises lead to conclusions, how to apply those conclusions. I'm sorry that Aristotle in the mid 300s BC didn't structure his words into the grand narrative that penetrates every school lesson in our present society. If you pay closer attention, you find that the kind of slavery you think of, is already condemned. However, you will find there are many other forms of slavery, to which you and everyone in your life finds themselves in - in one way or another.

[@Laocoon283]

Well your kinda dumb and he is kinda a genius so when you don't understand something don't jump to the conclusion that its dumb jump to the conclusion that you just simply don't understand it.

[@donaldtimpson4320]

Going through it again. I have no complaints, but I'm realizing it would be amazing if in the description you outlined the book. Just a suggestion.

[@trevorjames9366]

um just go to wikipedia or some other online site and you can read all about it!

[@Laocoon283]

​@@trevorjames9366stfu

[@w7lves]

bookmark 39:56

[@АлександрРусаков-в4с]

Clark Daniel Garcia Kenneth Martin William

[@Sillu129]

Why did it end mid-sentence?

[@gbartels3]

Who is the translator?

[@nicolemusic2242]

53 - unity of the state

[@nicolemusic2242]

1h 22 - equalisation of property ownership is necessary for po;otoca; stability

[@nicolemusic2242]

1h 26

[@nicolemusic2242]

1h 57 - insertions!!!

[@TheTrueforeigner]

what translation is this

[@alexvanderweert2785]

39:00

[@sobkovladimir5]

- Если в демократиях государственные перевороты вызываются необузданностью демагогов (ораторов парламентов), рвущихся к реальной власти, то в олигархиях - притеснением олигархами (коррумпированными государственными чиновниками и главами корпораций) народной массы (средних классов, как главной экономической основы общества), а также несогласия олигархов и чиновников друг с другом подают повод к общественным междоусобицам и гражданским войнам. Государственный переворот происходит и в том случае, когда олигархический холдинг сужается до минимума и обиженные вынуждены прибегать к содействию народа (как это произошло на Украине). Происходят государственные перевороты в олигархиях и тогда, когда олигархи, ведя распутную жизнь, растрачивают свое - а тем самым, и общественное - имущество, или они расхищают народное добро (как происходит в России и на Украине). Олигархия разрушается и в том случае, когда в ней образуется новая олигархия (как, опять таки, произошло в России и на Украине). Характерно, что во время войны олигархи оказываются вынужденными, не доверяя народу, пользоваться услугами наемных воинов и преступных групп (как это и происходит сегодня у нас в России и на Украине). Если же олигархия сочетается с тиранией (как в России) , то мотивами восстания являются ненависть и презрение к одиозным (омерзительными и ненавистным) политиканам (Аристотель. Политика. Причины государственных переворотов). В скобках мои замечания. - Хочу добавить, что олигархией называется строй, основывающийся на законодательно установленном имущественном цензе: у власти стоят там богатые, а бедняки не участвуют в управлении (Платон. Государство. Олигархия). Поэтому наша "олигархия" всего лишь народная кличка нашего "государства", которое тоже нелигитимно, посему очень неустойчиво и легко распадается. На самом деле у нас некое ублюдочное государственное образование, которое русский философ Владимир Соловьев назвал соединением плутократии и лохократии (Оправдание добра. Нравственная философия) а Николай Бухарин - симбиозом социализма дураков с фашизмом продувных бестий (Текущие задачи комсомола. Доклад на VIII Всесоюзном съезде ВЛКСМ.6 мая 1928 г. 2. Где классовые враги и "внутренние предатели"?).

[@sobkovladimir5]

- Хочу добавить, что олигархией называется строй, основывающийся на законодательно установленном имущественном цензе: у власти стоят там богатые, а бедняки не участвуют в управлении (Платон. Государство. Олигархия). Поэтому наша "олигархия" всего лишь народная кличка нашего "государства", которое тоже нелигитимно, посему очень неустойчиво и легко распадается.

[@sobkovladimir5]

На самом деле у нас некое ублюдочное государственное образование, которое русский философ Владимир Соловьев назвал соединением плутократии и лохократии (Оправдание добра. Нравственная философия) а Николай Бухарин - симбиозом социализма дураков с фашизмом продувных бестий (Текущие задачи комсомола. Доклад на VIII Всесоюзном съезде ВЛКСМ.6 мая 1928 г. 2. Где классовые враги и "внутренние предатели"?).

[@Human_Evolution-]

Who were the sleeves?

[@sinicidentity1210]

13:30

[@yiqingwang1437]

He did have some very brilliant ideas as well as very evil ones. The value of a human being, in his eyes, is based on how useful they can be to the State. This is pure evil. He certainly understood the human nature, yet he also put too high on human "virtues". However he was a great thinker and a great writer. Indeed he had some very good ideas too, like personal responsibilities and that each person needs to have virtues.

[@volfi123]

His idea of state and the modern one are very different though. If the phrase is used in our context, then yes , it is evil . If it is used in the context of an ancient greek polis then there is nothing wrong with it. You live and die with the polis cause it is what elevates man above the barbarian status.

[@PeenPuncher]

6:15:00

[@ahmidahmid9303]

30:00

[@maztermonzter9764]

7:01:37 Aristotle was right The Greeks People are The Master Race Superior to all the barberians of europe and asia.

[@LostMerkaba]

MAKE ANIME REEEEEEEEEEEEE

[@sparrowthesissy2186]

Wow, this guy is actually evil. How was this man considered a titan of deep thought?

[@jameseldridge3445]

Timestamps?

[@benjaminwalker7793]

I'll be honest, I don't think Democracy works. Why? Because the 2 main goals over a democratic government can almost never be met: either you have Proportional representation, it gives an accurate representation of how the people voted but no Strong government. Or First-Past-The-Post, which delivers strong government but no accurate representation of how the people actually voted! With all this considered, I think it is necessary to maintain a democratic government, not because we want to, but because we have! Democracy is, in my opinion the best system of governing we have!

[@benjaminwalker7793]

I think I have come up with some sort of solution since I wrote this comment: 1)We abolish the party system: Many people in liberal democracies don't vote based on which party they agree with more, but based on how their parents and grandparents voted and in the parties themselves, members of one party defend a party member based solely on the fact that they don't want to see a member of Parliament removed from office and replaced with an opposing party's candidate. Thus it is reasonable to say that Political Parties tend to create a sense of tribalism both amongst the people, and the politicians 2)We make it so that a Minister or secretary puts a policy before the Prime Minister/President, who then calls a Referendum on the issue. 3)We remove all forms of Parliament and replace them with the people. Because there is little point in having a parliament to pass bills if the people are going to do that anyway. 4)We establish some sort of organisation to ensure that the government is going it's job. 5) We adopt an electoral system similar to that of the French, 2 rounds of voting the first: the 2 most popular candidates go forward to the 2nd. the second one of the these 2 candidates wins a majority of support. 6)Elections are not won on policy, but on level of competence. So the personality of the candidate is the biggest thing for them to focus on. There are some other things but this reply is getting quite long, I have no intention of making you read a novel, I mean you are already listening to an audiobook! Now, I do have a few criticisms of my own proposals! first of all: could it even work? Can we really be sure such a system wouldn't lead to Dictatorship or anarchy? How would we go about implant such a system? How would such an electoral system be in anyway useful apart from showing some sort strength at UN meetings like G20?

[@benjaminwalker7793]

Well, you do have an interesting point, I believe that any change in society, no matter how major, no matter how minor nor insignificant, can only succeed if those whom live in the lowest parts of modern society (I.e. the E,D Classes) are convinced first. Thus, I believe that the only way to ensure that such a system, such a suggestion could work. And, I agree our society is for one reason or another, built to keep those whom live in ignorance, living in ignorance. We have seen, again and again throughout history, that those in ignorance, whom live under the suppression of ignorance always end up being the first to suffer when radical change is made, 1917, with the rise of Lenin's Soviet Union 1933, with the election of Adolf Hitler into the chancery of Weimar Germany. I do have one question: The term "...it will effect the world like a ripple in an ocean." What do you mean by that, that statement could be interpreted to mean: "If you change gains dominance in one corner of the world, then it shall spread to all others" and could also be interpreted to mean "I think the change you want to see, could have catastrophic consequences". which one is accurate?

[@benjaminwalker7793]

Well, I certainly have no intention of creating heaven on earth, rather to create a system of which works. I believe that a system which both works and is fair, and gives every individual the ability (or at least opportunity) to reach the potential is a long way off though I believe that it could potentially occur, if the human mind becomes developed enough and philosophy is explored deeply enough. You certainly have an interesting theory on life after death, that is for certain. And I can't say I have any inclination to disagree, I haven't yet thought much on the concept of life after death. For me, it comes down to there must be some sort of life post death, for it is (in my opinion) inconceivable that the existence of an individual's life can just vanish on the draw of the terminal breath. True, I suppose one's opinion on whether or not the Nazis and the Soviets were evil would ultimately come down to their personal moral code, but I would make the argument that Hitler, Lenin, Marx, Gentile, all believed that what they were doing was the correct thing to do, Hitler believed that the Jew was a terrible creature of which the world needed to be rid of, Lenin believed that it was right for the Russian people to overthrow the Tzar and replace the Tzardom with a People's government. Though neither, Lenin especially, really realised what they had caused.

[@benjaminwalker7793]

I see, that would make more sense, yes. I'd love to know, who shaped your world view and your philosophy?

[@nickklein8163]

We don't have deomcracy,at best, we have a mixed oligarchical-democracy. Aristotle's experience was with the city-state, not modern republics. His perspective still rings true if you apply his principles.

[@talytasbarcelos]

1:29

[@sirazrocky9235]

Aristotle just said slavery is right lmao...

[@gummipalle]

+siraz rocky I heard natural... Not "right".

[@williebizzle9416]

siraz rocky if you think about it, some people need to be guided or they will do nothing and wither away.. I think that was his meaning (slavery the word) doesn't really mean what it does now these days.. or it does but it was a different way of living back then slavery still exists today it just more silverside today than it was back then..

[@Abaddonian]

looks like you need to relisten.

[@williebizzle9416]

@@eoin3591 exactly... You explained it far better than me ha

[@phycogsmithomniscience309]

understand Aristotle was a rationalist. so in todays time he wouldn't have said slave.. he would have said laborer... the laborer is as close to the severant as we could get , and then we have the business man.. so it argues that this concept isn't dead.. its just real.. you ether run a business or you work for a business. this is nature and is apart of nature.. now the morality of the modern world is Thank God for the free market.. because you can choose who you work for, and if you been blessed with inteligence you can make a worth while business.

[@malebitsatimbuktu3352]

Who's reading this in 2017?

[@benjaminwalker7793]

by reading do you mean "who is reading the book at this particular moment in time?" or "who is listening to this in 2017?" if the latter, me!

[@TheLockon00]

This is a public service!

[@zelalemzeleke1277]

Roasted Worm(Aristo tel)...

[@JustTheFactsPls]

History repeats THEY say. We should pay better attention to History to understand what was the Guide/ Sources THEY read/ saw and followed. Hints of Truth in the BrainWashing/ MindControl information. THEY really, really love EGYPT. Very important to THEM = areas to research.

[@robertruschak7083]

Them🤔 The mysterious of human life!

[@koboldgeorge2140]

how do I stop being a slave :(

[@jameseldridge3445]

You're lightyears ahead by reading this book

[@spiritofsoul1415]

Goood

[@socccorbot]

30bm

[@nazaren45]

👍

[@ChurchHorace-m5l]

Rodriguez Scott Robinson Nancy Hernandez Amy

[@jackymarcel4108]

Lopez Laura Johnson Mary Johnson Mary

[@Mouqawem]

sounds like ben shapiro in x2

[@Laocoon283]

No

[@jameseldridge3445]

Lol no. Shapiro is a Jew and they despise Hellenism on Goyim

[@benjaminhundley2783]

Now I don't have to read it!

[@yerpyaboy]

Aristotle was raised by the "state" he is no friend of man

[@phycogsmithomniscience309]

do you know the full history of him.. I recommend you research more

[@nicolemusic2242]

2h52m37s

[@chinemeremohaeri9100]

this guy's deduction is severely lacking.

[@chinemeremohaeri9100]

***** Lol. I said that a long time ago. I sound like I was insulting him, but I really wasn't. I have to re-watch the video in order to explain what was in my mind at that time.

[@36cmbr]

Disgusting & foppish, evil.

[@nathanporter7334]

I hope trump gets lucky and wins bwe ....the 2024 president

[@Note.O]

What kind of chauvinistic crap is this, Aristotle? "The man is more fit to rule"... Say that again?

[@NightKnight347]

I see you have the penetrating mind for understanding and contemplating arguments, precisely the skill necessary for ruling.

[@jameseldridge3445]

@@NightKnight347 Lmao

[@ShadowGricken]

Its almost like he was writing 2300 years ago

[@xxcoopcoopxx]

@2:00:44 Da fuq he say? Did Aristotle just...

[@talytasbarcelos]

Best reader ever!!!💛

[@Pyasa.shaitan]

10:00

[@thefinnishbolshevik2404]

07:25:00

[@williamdoenges8089]

1:13:01

[@tertiary7]

2:38:14

[@treyburton1469]

29:30