Fascinating Physical Evidence of Noah’s Flood

Many modern scientists claim there’s no physical evidence for Noah’s flood, but is that true? In this episode of The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark, Calvin Smith reveals the abundance of physical evidence we have for Noah’s flood.
To see more episodes of The Genesis Account of Noah's Ark, start your 7-day free trial of Answers TV: www.answers.tv/
To see the life-size Noah’s Ark in Kentucky, visit the Ark Encounter: arkencounter.com/
Taken from Noah's Ark Pocket Guide: AnswersinGenesis.org/store/pr...

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God's word stands forever ✝️🙏

[@BobSmith-ew5oi]

Nothing is forever even his evil word.Hopefully one day will apologize for the oceans of blood has caused over time.All his tantrums and anger management problems and coupled with the morals of a sewer rat to condone slavery.A very nasty and deceitful being whose days of laughing at us are nearly over.Go and find someone else to torture.

[@mar145gh7]

😂

[@djb5320]

This makes you a supporter of slavery. Religion makes otherwise good people do and say terrible things.

[@kevinburke1325]

​@djb5320 wow, you just made the most ignorant statement ever.

[@georgebond7777]

​@@djb5320we ended slavery but you put a man in a woman's toilet

[@murfyhousemouse7075]

God's word is TRUTH!

[@veronicacampbell3107]

Absolute!

[@mar145gh7]

Completely full of lies

[@keichan9661]

Talking snakes are a fact and so are 7 headed dragons! Yipeee

[@kevinburke1325]

​@mar145gh7 nope. Revelations is happening currently word for word from the Bible.

[@keichan9661]

@@kevinburke1325 Sure, so go out and have a beer.

[@chriscurtis1578]

One of the things in your video that you didn't point out was the water lines that were cut into the high peaks of the hills and mountains. I live close to a large river and there are tall hills and cliffs on each side, and you can clearly see how the water rapidly cut into the sides of the rock. Rain and wind cannot cause this kind of erosion and scaring, only a global flood that covered everything could have done this. I live at least 9 hours from the closest ocean, yet I find brachiopods and trilobites all the time. This is some great information you're putting out. God Bless John 3:30

[@chriscurtis1578]

@All About Britain These same type of markings created by water are found 8,000 feet above sea level in Oregon and Arizona. The markings I’m referring to above the river where I live are 200-300 feet high which means everything below them for hundreds of square miles would have been under flowing water at one time. At least 4,000 years ago.

[@stevepierce6467]

Millions of years ago the present interior was ocean.

[@usamachinist]

@@stevepierce6467 LOL!

[@chriscurtis1578]

@All About Britain a Saber tooth tiger skeleton was found within a quarter of mile from this same river so could not have been that deep and wide.

[@chriscurtis1578]

By the way I love Britian and plan to visit one day soon with my wife. Long live the King! If you like him haha.

[@potentatewags]

Ancient people's around the world share many biblical stories- giants, gods(fallen angels) coming to teach them things, breed, etc, as well as the flood. So yeah, the Bible actually is pretty historical.

[@BobSmith-ew5oi]

Not really historical for plagiarized mythical material from cultures thousands of years prior.Is neither a scientific book either as some misguided people believe.Instead of allowing so much evil if the bible had put one or two things in about medicine so many lives could of been saved but that to hard for god and really hates us being happy as rather see most of us bbq.

[@Minifliek]

Historically inaccurate ? Since multiple of those ancient civilizations pre date the bible. Even if they did they didn't have the means to travel to different continents for thousands of years after the flood. All these stories and myths are completely different from one another. And floods happen everywhere all the time.

[@sabhishek9289]

​@@Minifliek Hmm no, if we listen carefully to every eyewitness account across the world about the ancient past. They all not only report a global flood but they also confirm much of the genesis accounts. And the old testament has testable claims just like in Science proving that the old testament authors are genuine eyewitnesses of the global flood and they are more reliable than the epic of Gilgamesh and such. The old testament was perfectly preserved through oral traditions.

[@chriskourliourod1651]

And “religion “ is man reaching for God; Christianity is God reaching man. There’s quite a huge difference, and the so-called “religions “ are demonic manifestations.

[@earlysda]

Jesus said angels don't marry.

[@CharlesHuse]

There are non-fossilized seashells found atop Mt. Snowdon at 3000 feet in the UK, and other high mountain peaks around the world. If there was no global flood, then how did they get there?

[@stevepierce6467]

The Hawaiian Islands were not there 7 million years ago. It was open ocean. How did they get there?

[@greatbriton8425]

@All About Britain You've got it!

[@plainsman]

@@stevepierce6467 - Are you SERIOUS? The Hawaiian Islands are all formed by undersea volcanoes. At less than 1 million years old, the island of Hawaiʻi continues to form with the most active volcanoes. Maui and Lānaʻi are about 1.5 million years old. Molokaʻi is nearly 2 million years old, and Oʻahu is about 3 to 4 million years old.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@plainsman Exactly the point I was making. How could seashells be found on mountains? The earth changes over millions of years, including volcanic eruptions making islands where once there were none. Every day that the newly appeared islets existed, tides brought ashore sea animals, some of whom stayed and were covered by new deposits as the islands grew. But none of this was possible if you are married to the young earth creation dogma of the bible, with its flood and preposterous ark. I too am a plainsman, and where I live in Great Plains of the USA, sea animal fossils are everywhere, 1500 miles from the sea! How can that be? Miracle! God! No, just an area which was ocean millions of years ago.

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

They were fossilized, some of them have just been weathered out of the surround sedimentary strata.

[@ogredad55]

Dear Ark Encounter: This is really great stuff! Thanks and God bless you for sharing this!

[@magistradox39]

I would have loved to watch a discussion about the giant trees before the flood. Tall like skyscrapers or even mountains.

[@wobotnik]

Where does this story about giant trees come from? There's no actual evidence.

[@hornplayer1228]

Large lumber was not in existence at that time in Arabia. That is why the arc was built out of "Gopherwood" which is an early form of plywood created by using tree sap as a form of resin for gluing the layers together. The ark site in Turkey has revealed massive timber beams laminated together from smaller timbers. Gopherwood did not exist in any natural state.

[@wobotnik]

@@hornplayer1228 Believe in the ark all you like, but there's no hard evidence of it in Turkey or anywhere else.

[@magistradox39]

@@wobotnik Watch the series from "Is Genesis history". Everything we live on today (petrified stuff) got petrified during the Big Flood. Every culture has flood stories. Sedimentation only happens suddenly, never over millions of years because of erosion. We should have hundreds of metres thick dust everywhere, but we don't. If the Bible is true you need giant trees, huge atmosphere, different stronger electromagnetic field, more carbon dioxide and oxygen, higher atmospheric pressure etc.

[@wobotnik]

@@magistradox39 I'm afraid all the actual scientific evidence conflicts with the bible story. I'm happy to stick with the experts.

[@lauracaskey2753]

God bless your ministry sir! Thank you for presenting the truth of our Bible and of our glorious Father. Praise God!!

[@QuestionThingsUseLogic]

It's difficult to find any truth in the bible.

[@magistradox39]

​@@QuestionThingsUseLogic Spread your negativity somewhere else person in darkness and without hope. Thanks.

[@repealthepatriotact]

Ummm...nope. Apparently you haven't read anything about this written by an actual modern-day geologist. Also, the flood story in the bible has long been FACTUALLY shown to have been plagiarized from the ancient Sumerian story in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Only children who have been programmed by the church and brainwashed adults with limited critical thinking and reasoning ability believe the stories in the bible are true. Most of the bible, in fact, has been shown to be largely plagiarized from other older stories and other sources. Even the new testament is hilariously and blatantly stolen form the ancient Egyptians' story of Isis, Osiris, and Horus, as well as being flavored with pagan concepts. Not only that, the Flavian scholars are the ones that actually crafted the whole Jesus myth to promote their own political goals, never dreaming that their lies would take off and become the greatest literary hoax of all time(alongside Islam), creating a worldwide religion that was abused by empires to conquer and destroy cultures and entire countries-Mexico, Canada, Russia, Greece, France, Spain, Italy, Brazil and most parts of South America, the native peoples of North America, the Irish, the Scottish, the Celts, the original immigrants and the now modern United States.......Christianity is a murderous, rights taking, culture suppressing cancer. It has destroyed my family over several generations. Those in my family that cling to their religion are the most judgmental, arrogant, hypocritical, and selfish members, and are only allowed very minimal contact with the rest of us-funerals, weddings, family reunions. Otherwise they are forbidden to interact with our children so that the hate and judgment will not affect them.

[@vhawk1951kl]

Does"your biuble"embrace/ include Genesis? Are you a blood jew or a religious go-to-synagogue jew?

[@user-do5ln7ez2d]

@@magistradox39 >> Spread your negativity somewhere else person in darkness and without hope. Thanks ThingsUseLogic is right. Everything that was presented in the video is a hoax. It's made up. There is no problem for geologists to explain how the Grand Canyon came into existence. The makers of this movie are frauds.

[@johnthompson1437]

i just love how you explain it all! thank you so very much!

[@erc1971erc1971]

Calvin is my favorite video host out of everyone at Answers In Genesis, he does such a good job of laying out the evidence in a clear way.

[@johnthompson1437]

@@erc1971erc1971 yes he does!

[@howdydoodey3872]

Why didn't human societies in Africa, Australia, Europe, Russia, Far East, and the Americas NOT perish?

[@sapientemsapientem80]

@@howdydoodey3872 who told you they diden`t

[@user-do5ln7ez2d]

Because they have an uninterrupted line of history.

[@russianforgod]

i was climbing the cluff out in Utah and i came to rest next to a river but i was probably 250 ft above river. i looked in the sand around a rock i was sitting on and discovered sea shells and like little clams. i was so thrown off by that. God is amazing

[@roydodds3693]

Are you seriously saying you have never heard of fossils, plate tectonics and erosion? The sea shells you talk of lived in the Western Interior Seaway during the Cretaceous period - c100 million years ago. You can find similar sea shells from a similar period in the Himalayas - the tallest mountains on Earth are formed from the seafloor that once existed between India and Asia, called the Tethys. It has nothing to do with any mythical flood, but evidence of the wonderful and dynamic planet we live on.

[@bonesrhodes3762]

--- those are Utah Cliff Clams - they also climb trees

[@plainsman]

Over many millions of years, seas and the creatures in them have come and gone numerous times and as a consequence dead hard-shelled creatures get fossilized. It's no big mystery.

[@magistradox39]

​@@roydodds3693 Plate tectonic theory. Do you know what a theory is? The same goes with the ridiculous Evolution Theory.

[@andreribeiro521]

@@magistradox39 It seems that you are the one who doesn't know what theory means. In science, a theory is the highest you can get with any explanation of a physical phenomena. It's not the same as theory in common speech, that is a common misunderstanding of the semantics related to science. In science, a theory is something that we know that is true, but can be expanded. Like the tectonic plate theory, the Evolution Theory, the Theory of relativity or the Big Bang Theory. All of these are well undemented and predict phenomena which the bible can't. We don't use the word fact in science, because these concepts get expanded. For example, the theory of relativity doesn't coincide with Quantum Mechanics where it should, therefore, physicists are looking for a grand unified theory which can accommodate the two smaller theories. That being said, you have the right not to believe in these theories and just keep living your everyday life using the scientific inventions which were made using these theories, being a hypocrite, however, if you were the least literate, which it doesn't seem that you are, you would know that the word theory used in science is not the same as in regular everyday speech. If it was, then a law would be stronger than a theory in science. However, in science, a theory is way more complex and fundamental, and in many cases even encompasses many laws

[@runwillrobinson]

Thank you! I took a rafting tour through the Grand Canyon years ago and it was led by a Creation Scientist. Fascinating! We saw curved slate layers almost 1 mile deep in the canyon. Clearly laid down by water.

[@bonesrhodes3762]

"a Creation Scientist" --- is this a George Carlin skit about " words that don't go together" ?

[@georgebond7777]

​@bonesrhodes3762 yeah like Newton, Maxwell Faraday et al

[@chriskourliourod1651]

Carlin is just a mere human being. One can easily be a so-called scientist and a Godly man at the same time, if not even more of a scientist due to his Godliness. Life is Life; non-life is nothing.

[@Jewonastick]

A creation scientist is like a vegan steak.... Or a square ball...

[@knightclan4]

@@Jewonastick I see that you are commenting here negatively Are you curious or just trolling the creationist websites

[@vidar7106]

Recently discovered, there is more water underground than there is on the surface. I believe in passage, the term “welled up” is used which suggests that it didn’t just rain. In time, the water would resend into the opened cravases it came from.

[@AmericanActionReport]

I smiled when I read your comment about underground water. In at least four places in the Bible (including two in the Flood account), "springs of the deep" and "fountains of the deep" are mentioned. It wasn't until 1980, that scientists discovered warm-water, clear-water springs in the depths of the ocean. They've concluded since then that there's four times as much water in the earth's crust than in all the oceans of the world combined.

[@vidar7106]

@All About Britain Nope... Thats on the surface. They recently discovered oceans of water under the crust.

[@AmericanActionReport]

@All About Britain More like 96.5%, but close enough. It appears that the 6 quintillion gallons of water in the earth's crust wouldn't be enough to cover the earth more than a few dozen meters deep. Thanks for the heads up.

[@greatbriton8425]

The main thing is the upthrust of land pushing up. That's why there's seashells on Mt Everest.

[@AmericanActionReport]

@@greatbriton8425 Thanks. I live in Taiwan, which has the highest (not necessarily the tallest) mountains in east Asia for that very reason. The Pacific plate pushed the western end of the Philippine plate over the eastern end of the Eurasian plate. I'll have to think about that in regards to the Grand Canyon.

[@ChristysChannelYall]

I read a book called The Flood written in 1955 by Rehwinkel was the author’s name. It talked about all of this evidence. Great book! Btw, I came out to the Ark Encounter back in 2019 and brought my kids. It was amazing! Thanks for making it!

[@paulhaynes3688]

Deluded in the extreme

[@steveseifertsr.8120]

You do realize that Rehwinkle was an "Apologist" and would say anything in support of the religious false narratives and make money from it??

[@paulhaynes3688]

The bible is extremely accurate especially if thrown from small distances

[@steveseifertsr.8120]

@@paulhaynes3688 Yep about 1 inch,lol!!

[@ITPalGame]

An old book you can maybe find in a library (there was one in my city library in the 90s)or in digital form now is the collegiate grade "The Genesis Flood" by Whitcomb and Morris. If I remember correctly, it doesn't take the 6k years model but it does take on the current era global flood looking at geology and other scientific evidence.

[@kilroywashere513]

I meant to type this on the comment section on the third part of this; I have a theory that some of the waters from the flood became the ice caps on mountains and the rest of it became the ice that exits at the north and south poles, like Antarctica, and the ice at the arctic circle at the North Pole too💁🏻‍♂.

[@zakkmarchant]

I thought the same thing

[@davidgardner863]

If all the ice in the world melted it would only raise the sea level about 400 feet. The ice at the North Pole is floating so it wouldn’t contribute at all.

[@bonesrhodes3762]

---- I have a theory that you haven't really thought about your theory in much depth

[@deepcosmiclove]

@@davidgardner863 All the land was lower, there wree no mountains in the anti-deluvian earth.

[@davidgardner863]

@@deepcosmiclove , Sure the mountains were lower 50 million years ago but doesn’t quite fit in with the biblical time line, does it?

[@papabear562]

I appreciate how this information is being presented. Looking forward to Part 5!

[@autojohn-pu1vf]

I know how it ends! There's a great big petrified wooden boat in the mountains of Turkey right above a place that's been called "The Valley of the Eight" for all of recorded history (in their language) and is currently called (in their language) "Noah's Arc National Park"

[@voiceofreason162]

​@@autojohn-pu1vf the ground penetration radar surveys are encouraging and there artifacts recovered at the site. The dimensions are right. But they haven't done a deep dive yet. Secular universities won't invest in it. Wrong philosophy.

[@autojohn-pu1vf]

@@voiceofreason162 They allowed a film crew to rappel down in there the vid is on the Tube link won't post....

[@autojohn-pu1vf]

@@voiceofreason162 You saw the easy to find vids, all the good ones are like trying to share💉☠💉information☮

[@voiceofreason162]

@@autojohn-pu1vf welcome to my world. The information superhighway blocks unwanted traffic. And unwanted opinions. No matter how well informed.

[@addersrinseandclean]

Thank you for these videos

[@jimseiler4651]

This is a brilliant presentation! Thanks AE Team for bringing the Bible to life in these confusing times!

[@user-do5ln7ez2d]

The times are confusing indeed if people are told all these lies. Nothing of the stuff they claim in this movie holds up to scrutiny. It’s sad how people get served on a platter what they already want to believe. Just look up the explanations geologists for this so-called “evidence” for Noah’s flood.

[@brucewelty7684]

The Grand Canyon itself disproves eons of change.

[@hardrockminer-50]

Actually, the Grand Canyon shows millions of years of climate change , continental shift, and geologic movement. There's soooo much this narrator does not know physics and fluid dynamics. In my way of thinking, the billions of years in geologic time show how eternal God is.

[@stevepierce6467]

The existence of horses and antelope proves unicorns.

[@plainsman]

@@stevepierce6467 - And yet not one of the many known prehistoric horse fossils exhibit a central horn. Not one.

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

@@hardrockminer-50 I'd just like to say while I do not share your religious views I do really appreciate that you are open to scientific evidence and discovery.

[@frenchimp]

@@plainsman That's because the horn of the unicorn is of a spiritual nature and is therefore not easily detected in fossils.

[@AmericanActionReport]

For most of my life, I've thought of the Grand Canyon as evidence for a worldwide flood. When I first heard the textbook explanation when I was in high school, it didn't make sense. A one-mile-deep canyon consisting of a mile of sediment, clearly proves that flowing water at least a mile deep- was in the area. Add to that the fact of gravity causing water to seek its own level. Thus, the water was not only more than a mile deep, it had to be wide enough for the water not to just drain away.

[@AmericanActionReport]

@All About Britain How did sediment a mile deep get there?

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

@@AmericanActionReport You do realize not all of that sediment was deposited by water though, right? And not all of the alluvial (deposited by water) stratum are from the same depositional environments. For example the Coconino Sandstone is eolian in origin, meaning it was deposited by wind as dune structures on dry land. The Coconino Sandstone is sandwiched between the Hermit Shale (lowland swamp deposit) and the Toroweap Formation (shallow sea gypsum/shale deposit primarily caused by evaporation). How exactly does a windblown sedimentary layer get deposited between water deposited sandstones in the flood model?

[@stevepierce6467]

A mile-deep layer of sediment probably proves that there was a deep lake that slowly got filled in by sediment being deposited by river flows over millions of years.

[@AmericanActionReport]

@@stevepierce6467 Due to my experience in proof-reading SSCI articles and peer reviewer comments, I would say, "strongly indicates" rather than "probably proves." Your comment is more thought-provoking than most I've read on the question. I'm not wedded to any one explanation, and I'll ruminate over it.

[@repealthepatriotact]

Ummm...nope. Apparently you haven't read anything about this written by an actual modern-day geologist. Also, the flood story in the bible has long been FACTUALLY shown to have been plagiarized from the ancient Sumerian story in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Only children who have been programmed by the church and brainwashed adults with limited critical thinking and reasoning ability believe the stories in the bible are true. Most of the bible, in fact, has been shown to be largely plagiarized from other older stories and other sources. Even the new testament is hilariously and blatantly stolen form the ancient Egyptians' story of Isis, Osiris, and Horus, as well as being flavored with pagan concepts. Not only that, the Flavian scholars are the ones that actually crafted the whole Jesus myth to promote their own political goals, never dreaming that their lies would take off and become the greatest literary hoax of all time(alongside Islam), creating a worldwide religion that was abused by empires to conquer and destroy cultures and entire countries-Mexico, Canada, Russia, Greece, France, Spain, Italy, Brazil and most parts of South America, the native peoples of North America, the Irish, the Scottish, the Celts, the original immigrants and the now modern United States.......Christianity is a murderous, rights taking, culture suppressing cancer. It has destroyed my family over several generations. Those in my family that cling to their religion are the most judgmental, arrogant, hypocritical, and selfish members, and are only allowed very minimal contact with the rest of us-funerals, weddings, family reunions. Otherwise they are forbidden to interact with our children so that the hate and judgment will not affect them.

[@Raw-guitar]

Noah was a great man.

[@repealthepatriotact]

Yup, a great make-believe never existed man whose name was attached to a stolen Sumerian story about a great flood.

[@Raw-guitar]

@@repealthepatriotact Sumerian story is Noahs flood .. There are many flood storys from civilisations.. All points to Noahs flood.

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

​@@Raw-guitarYou draw parallels out of unrelated topics because of your beliefs. Let me remind you there shouldnt be anyone left alive to tell the tale in the first place... only Noah. America and Antartica wouldve been a barren wasteland for centuries, which they arent, because nothing such as a worldwide flood ever happened. Talk to more people ffs

[@tdawg385]

What's funny is that in all artist depictions, the ark has a natural wood color when the scriptures say that it was covered with pitch inside and out. That means that it would've been completely black. A small detail but still significant.

[@TraitorFelon.14.3]

What is written in the Bible only matters if it is gay bashing.

[@holden808]

​@Traitorman.14.3 alot of people don't believe that either though. Just because someone doesn't believe it, doesn't mean it's not true🤷‍♂️

[@jonathans.219]

I love watching this guy

[@jeffmetz1190]

The evidence for Noah's flood truly is overwhelming.

[@kasperpedersen1527]

Is it though?

[@stevepierce6467]

no evidence at all.

[@plainsman]

No, quite the contrary.There was never a global flood to begin with, and as a consequence there was never an ark. Such a flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. For instance, how do you explain the relative ages of mountains? Why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of any such catastrophe during that time.

[@urbugnmetoday3183]

@@stevepierce6467 but there’s a book that said so…and called deniers conspiracy theorists, hahaha

[@stevepierce6467]

@@urbugnmetoday3183 Tell ma about this book. What is its message? Does it deny conspiracies, or conspiracy theorists? As for the great ark conspiracy, there is no denying it!

[@cptrikester2671]

Get all the geological scientists together and develop a succinct model that accounts for all the global strata and distribution. A multi-billion year model vs a multi-millenia model. They could argue the facts/fallacies of each model. Instead of just labeling the other theory as incorrect. Everything is in it's place as a result of a sequence of events.

[@plainsman]

Geologists already have such an understanding, and it doesn't include anything as preposterous as a global flood. Such a flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. For instance, how do you explain the relative ages of mountains? Why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of any such catastrophe during that time.

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

@@plainsman Possibly most damning is why aren't there terrestrial fossils found at the top of Mt. Everest? People like to point at the marine fossils found there as proof of a global flood but why do we not find fossils of terrestrial species there as well? A worldwide flood would obviously deposit a spectrum of terrestrial/marine plants and animal fossils, yet we only find marine fossils. And why are all of these marine fossils of extinct species and not extant ones. There's no model that makes sense of a worldwide cataclysmic flood being able to selectively sort and deposit fossils.

[@stevepierce6467]

I think you will find that university libraries everywhere have sections full of geological research. Not much to find from the creationist side. Geologists have done the hard work; now it's time for you to do some work too.

[@repealthepatriotact]

Yes. It's been done, and is continually being added to and refined. Are you pro- facts and geology, or pro- religious lunacy?

[@cptrikester2671]

​@@repealthepatriotact I'm pro facts, and that does not exclude religious truths. Are you pro facts or just anti-theology?

[@waggyquack974]

Calvin explains the idea that many dinosaur fossils are found in sediments laid down by the flood therefore dinosaurs must have co-existed with man before and after the flood. Where in the world can we find human and dinosaur remains in the same sedimentary layer?

[@plainsman]

Nowhere. There are no human fossils or artifacts found with dinosaurs, and there are no dinosaur fossils found with human fossils. Furthermore, there is an approximately sixty-four-million-year gap in the fossil record when there are neither dinosaur nor human fossils. If humans and dinosaurs coexisted, traces of the two should be found in the same time places. At the very least, there should not be such a dramatic separation between them.

[@waggyquack974]

@@plainsman Very much as I suspected. Were human remains to be found alongside dinosaur remains then the young earth creationist crowd would be broadcasting it from the rooftops. Instead they have to come up with explanations like as the waters rose the humans went up onto high ground while the dinosaurs stayed on the lower ground and so that's why human remains and dinosaur remains are in different layers. Absolute nonsense.

[@georgemccreadyprice8195]

@@waggyquack974 Paluxy river tracks have been claimed to be of humans and dinosaurs but were proven to be only dinosaurs. A block of stone was once shown in creationist publications of a human foot with a Dino foot overlapping it. This was refused to be presented to experts though and further analysis of the pictures showed the foot print to not be indented as a normal print would be. Even funnier after all the false claims about deliberate fossil hoaxes, Kent Hovind made some hoax dinosaur prints at his cult sand pit in Alabama.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@plainsman Well allow me to give you an education on how men and dinosaurs co-existed. There were some documentaries made 60 years ago where it shows proof that dinosaurs and humans co-existed. In fact, dinosaurs were used to move stones at rock quarries and were the percussor to every kitchen appliance we have today. It was quite common to use large pterodactyls to fly people around from one part of these ancient civilizations to other parts, and they were commonly used as pets. If you go to the Hanna-Barbera museum, you can see this for yourself.

[@howdydoodey3872]

Dinosaurs helped with pyramid building too.

[@stewarttomkinson3356]

I already knew all this, but what I want to know is how did we get Giants again after the flood

[@bbl361]

Because it's written there were giants after the flood. It's said all flesh were destroyed, animals and men with the exception of the few on the ark. Same concept with the giants, a few survived, apparently in cube of sort, if you trust the Nephilim version of the flood, Enki's flood tale. A read of the book of Jubilees will further tell you how demons are the disembodied spirits of deceased giants. Actually they made oaths under the penalty of having their lands infested with Giants, either physical or disembodied ones. The whole Canaan story is a great example of how the violation of oaths was a death condamnation for the offender, they were bloated out of the book of life, even if it took centuries : the promised land to Abraham is in reality a restitution of stolen land to a righteous descendant. You should read that book. Brings so much clarity, no wonder the controlers had it hidden under the magical "apocrypha" word.

[@jasonscott6640]

When you’re looking at geological formations Think about a magician and the dining room table trick What happens when a tablecloth is pulled out from underneath a table setting, and everything on the table stays put? Plate Tectonics work the same way In that demonstration, the tableware is exhibiting Newton's laws of motion. Newton's first law says that the tableware will remain motionless unless acted upon by an outside force. To set the objects on the table into motion, the horizontal force acting upon them in this case is the frictional force between them and the table cloth. Newton's second law says the amount of force needed to accelerate the tableware is directly related to the rate of acceleration. When the tablecloth is pulled slowly, the tableware matches its low rate of acceleration and moves along with it. When the cloth is pulled quickly, the tableware needs to accelerate at a greater rate to move along with it; but the force needed to make that happen is greater than the frictional force available an it lags behind. If the cloth is pulled very rapidly, the tableware 'stays put.' Plate Tectonics work the same way. The Earths Crust is pliable and moves Where as the bodies of water stay because of the Earths Gravity But the plates can be stretched and moved So what you’re looking at World Wide is evidence of plate tectonics Not a World Wide Flood 😶

[@Kymallonia2012]

Wowww ~ This is sooo incredibly good! I love your narration, btw! Thank you!!!

[@NeilDegrasseTysonWithAKatana]

I am so glad that i didn't have to experience american education system... what I am even more glad of, is to have grown in a secular country

[@harveywabbit9541]

It was Zeus/Jupiter who was so angry at the people for not exercising charity that he ordered the flood. The rainbow stretches from the spring equinox to the autumn equinox (six days in Genesis one). In, the beginning, Zeus/Jupiter created Heaven (female) and Earth (male) united as one. At the spring equinox he separates them into the six "days" (spring equinox-autumn equinox) aka Eve and six "nights" (autumn equinox-spring equinox) aka Adam.

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

The American Education System has many problems but teaching creationism isn't one of them.

[@ansmerek]

​@@BlGGESTBROTHERthere is nothing wrong with teaching mythology in schools. I studied Greek and Roman mythology and found it just as interesting as Christian mythology. Education is a good thing

[@wesleymarkmusic403]

AMAZING!! Well done.

[@gigiherrington3072]

This is so amazing ❤

[@cliffordbaxter1992]

I would not have the Work's of God hidden from My Eyes 🙂 His Work's and his WORD are good enough for me ✝️🇺🇸😀

[@WarpRulez]

I just love how he gives evidence (valid or invalid, doesn't really matter in this context) of rapid burial of animals... and just attributes it to the biblical flood, as if any other cause for a rapid burial (including local floods) were completely out of the question. He doesn't even _try_ to explain why it had to be the biblical flood that did that, instead of something else (such as some local flood). It's a bit like saying that all buildings that exist in the world were built in the exact same year... by pointing to how a building is built within one year. Well, yeah, a building can be constructed in one year, but that doesn't mean _all_ buildings in the world were constructed _in the same year._

[@bonesrhodes3762]

----- you do realize that bringing logic and critical thinking to a creationist site is considered in bad taste and a high form of cheating ?

[@plainsman]

@@bonesrhodes3762 - I for one consider shooting fish in a barrel a legitimate sport.

[@bonesrhodes3762]

@@plainsman ---- yep: I am currently playing with one on another KZbin thread - the guy is the 2nd dumbest human I have ever encountered - he is totally immune to facts and is always dead wrong about everything: easily provably so - he's never going to wake-up but he's so much fun to ridicule and keeps coming back for more abuse

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

@@bonesrhodes3762 I don't even engage with them anymore (not on matters like these). It doesn't seem to do any good. I'm just here for the laughs!

[@WarpRulez]

@Keggek Many of these layers (with the same type of fossils in them) spread across continents... As if that were somehow contrary to what geology says. Geology does not say that same layers with same types of fossils shouldn't be found all around the world. It says the exact opposite of that.

[@mthiessen134]

I used to be an alpine climber. I’ve climbed 17 peaks in the Rocky Mountain Range. On numerous climbs we came across marine fossils between 6000-7000ft above sea level.

[@stevepierce6467]

Amazing evidence of geologic upthrust and oceans in the much lower central regions of the US millions of years ago. Not so much for a biblical flood.

[@mthiessen134]

@@stevepierce6467 I’m open to your evidence of your explanation

[@stevepierce6467]

@@mthiessen134 I suggest you start with the USGS explanation of Rocky Mountain National Park. It explains the eons of time during which rocks were formed, how the area was a sea, and how there were powerful internal forces that pushed up what we call today the Rockies. It does require that you accept a timeline of much longer than 6000 years. Geologists have studied this pretty thoroughly.

[@mthiessen134]

@@stevepierce6467 I have researched that theory. It’s fascinating no doubt. I do however prefer the 6000 year timeline. It not only lines up with my faith in a Creator of the universe, it lines up with the accounts of the Bible as a whole. As the Bible is about not only accounts that have happened it is about accounts that were prophesied thousands of years prior and happened exactly to the day. When hundreds of prophesies have been fulfilled to 100% accuracy, I put faith in that. Then I can put faith in 100% of the Bible. The next prophecy to be fulfilled is the one that you won’t want to miss. The rapture of the church so that the great tribulation can start.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@mthiessen134 Tell me just one prophecy that came true on the exact day mentioned.

[@blairmcfly3511]

This was great we need more people like this. We need to get Kent Hovind back on KZbin as well

[@kasperpedersen1527]

Oh you mean the guy that went to jail for tax evasion? And later convicted of domestic violence? Awesome role models you guys have.

[@healingthroughchrist1988]

I wasn't aware he was off KZbin.

[@noahmoore4404]

​@@kasperpedersen1527 our role model isn't Hovind its Christ, here are some quote from your role models though... Even if there are corpses of children in the basement I wouldnt care.." Sam Harris "Is incest a priori morally wrong?" Lawrence Kraus " Mild paedophilia wont do lasting harm" Richard Dawkins

[@TheSaintFrenzy]

Kent Hovind has some excellent presentations in the past. However, he is arrogant. He's also an unrepentant criminal and recently accused of enabling child abuse. He should be nowhere near the pulpit or public eye.

[@repealthepatriotact]

Ummm...nope. Apparently you haven't read anything about this written by an actual modern-day geologist. Also, the flood story in the bible has long been FACTUALLY shown to have been plagiarized from the ancient Sumerian story in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Only children who have been programmed by the church and brainwashed adults with limited critical thinking and reasoning ability believe the stories in the bible are true. Most of the bible, in fact, has been shown to be largely plagiarized from other older stories and other sources. Even the new testament is hilariously and blatantly stolen form the ancient Egyptians' story of Isis, Osiris, and Horus, as well as being flavored with pagan concepts. Not only that, the Flavian scholars are the ones that actually crafted the whole Jesus myth to promote their own political goals, never dreaming that their lies would take off and become the greatest literary hoax of all time(alongside Islam), creating a worldwide religion that was abused by empires to conquer and destroy cultures and entire countries-Mexico, Canada, Russia, Greece, France, Spain, Italy, Brazil and most parts of South America, the native peoples of North America, the Irish, the Scottish, the Celts, the original immigrants and the now modern United States.......Christianity is a murderous, rights taking, culture suppressing cancer. It has destroyed my family over several generations. Those in my family that cling to their religion are the most judgmental, arrogant, hypocritical, and selfish members, and are only allowed very minimal contact with the rest of us-funerals, weddings, family reunions. Otherwise they are forbidden to interact with our children so that the hate and judgment will not affect them.

[@anitaallen4143]

Thank-you for telling the truth.

[@chrisgraham2904]

Your standard of evidence to evaluate truth is extremely low. There is no truth here.

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

​@@fatstrategistHe genuinely did.

[@SunSheepOfLight]

So where did all the water 💦 go?

[@patrickbush9526]

🌊🛳🐆🐅🦓🦌🫏🐄🐫🦒🦏🐘🦛🦡🐦🗣sorry 🦨🦫

[@SunSheepOfLight]

@@patrickbush9526 Uh 😐

[@voiceofreason162]

Because you asked an intelligent question. Huge 'Ocean' Discovered Inside Earth By Ker Than, published February 28, 2007 The finding, made by Michael Wysession, a seismologist at Washington University in St. Louis, and his former graduate student Jesse Lawrence, now at the University of California, San Diego, will be detailed in a forthcoming monograph to be published by the American Geophysical Union. And they did. They go further 28th November 2016: "Scientists have made an incredible discovery: Earth has an underground ocean - deep underground, in the planet’s lower mantle far beneath the crust. The underground ocean consists of water trapped within minerals, and it may be the size of all of the Earth’s oceans put together. Those are the findings of two parallel studies conducted by researchers at Florida State University, the University of Edinburgh, and Northwestern University. The first study, carried out by Florida State and Edinburgh, found that water can exist far deeper in the Earth’s mantle than previously thought. They focused on how the water could exist so deep within the planet, and found that a mineral called brucite stores it. Their initial studies should that the water stored in the Earth’s mantle could account for as much as 1.5 percent of the Earth’s weight. The second study at Northwestern sought to determine how deep the water-storing brucite could go. A Brazilian diamond from a volcanic eruption 90 million years ago offered some clues. The diamond contained an imperfection caused by minerals that were trapped within the gem as it formed. The imperfection suggested that the diamond formed in the Earth’s lower mantle, a third of the way to the planet’s core. But it contained hydroxyl ions, which come from water. The researchers believe this indicates that brucite containing water can be found in the lower mantle as well. The information gathered by the studies shows that water may be an important part of the volcanic process, including “convection” that circulates the molten rock in the Earth’s mantle." At first (2007) they thought they'd found something as large as the Arctic Ocean. Now the global observations are in they now know its bigger than all the world's oceans combined, ranging from 160 to 610 miles. The zipper is the Mid-atlantic ridge. Now, I know this, so it wasn't hard finding it. But do you see this in evolutionary text books, school curriculums, MSM? You know the answer. You know why. I've scrolled through other comments. I'm satisfied they aren't the slightest bit interested in the science. Now ask another intelligent question, see what happens.

[@SunSheepOfLight]

@@voiceofreason162 Oh.

[@georgebond7777]

It's still here in the oceans an under your feet, have you heard of the water table. The dry land mass can fit 12 times in the depths of the oceans.

[@johnbrinsmead3316]

So if I assume God flooded the earth I should have no trouble finding evidence for it.

[@davidgardner863]

Yeah, like the fossils of all creatures that ever lived should be mixed together.

[@simohayha6031]

​@@davidgardner863 no

[@davidgardner863]

@@simohayha6031 , No? Are you a geologist?

[@hava4587]

This is eye opening

[@howdydoodey3872]

Why didn't human societies in Africa, Australia, Europe, Russia, Far East, and the Americas NOT perish?

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

​@@howdydoodey3872😂No one will answer you with facts because there are none

[@incheonhandiman]

Thanks for the enlightenment!

[@a.v.6727]

this video literally restored my faith. thank you. I've been having some thoughts-- doubts about God. this is what I needed to fill that gap. once again, thank you.

[@greatbriton8425]

The evidence for creation is very important because the lie of evolution, when presented as science, does clash with the Bible. If it's any help at all, I have a Biochemistry degree and can assure you with 100% certainty that both abiogenesis (life from non-life) and evolution (nett gain of function via mutations producing more and better genes) are completely impossible, and every scientists knows it, though some delude themselves. (There's variety within a species but that comes from a very clever mechanism of chromosome exchange. And all genese are breaking down over time. That's why it was once okay to marry your sibling, and then after the Flood, your cousin only, and now not even your cousin, because of the odds of you and your spouse sharing the same broken gene). Finally, I have had many experiences talking to God and Him telling me stuff I didn't know. I encourage you to make it your daily prayer that God reveal himself to you more closely.

[@jan_777]

@@greatbriton8425 Thanks for the insight. Another thing I find is strange is the notion that order can’t follow chaos, and I always ask myself how something as structured as our brain should have developed coincidentally.

[@greatbriton8425]

@@jan_777 The reason order can't follow chaos is because order is a higher energy state and atoms are in random motion which results in continual shift to lower energy states. In the end of the universe, if it was allowed to end, when every star has gone out, everything will be one even temperature, and dead. It takes spiritual design to use energy to create higher ordered states. Even our brains aren't enough to explain free will: with which atoms do we decide, and with which atoms do we manipulate those atoms, and how do we control THOSE atoms? Our free will is a super-natural thing, spirit controlling matter.

[@jan_777]

@@greatbriton8425 Or as Paul said, we’re never free (or have a free will) either we’re a slave to Christ or to sin. I think it’s remarkable that God often plays with these physical laws, like the one you mentioned „shift to lower energy states“. The burning bush of Moses was never burned even though science says it’s impossible.

[@greatbriton8425]

@@jan_777 Hmm I disagree with both, really. We're voluntary slaves to Christ. Our free will is submitted to him by choice. And I prefer C. S. Lewis's understanding of miracles as not suspension of physical laws, but overriding them with a higher law. Just chatting btw, not arguing or persuading. Appreciate your comment.

[@noahbolt]

3:57 exactly!

[@terfybrown9349]

Even God's "catastrophes" are so beautiful.

[@j.douglassizemore792]

Drowning most of the peoples of the world is beautiful? Strange belief in a strange deity.

[@terfybrown9349]

@J. Douglas Sizemore the evidences of the Flood, like the Grand Canyon, are beautiful. And God is the only deity, and He is Holy. He is also righteous, and His judgment upon the earth is coming again, but the next time will be by fire.

[@markb3786]

@@terfybrown9349 Which God is the only deity?

[@plainsman]

There was never a global flood to begin with, and as a consequence there was never an ark. Such a flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. For instance, how do you explain the relative ages of mountains? Why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of any such catastrophe during that time.

[@terfybrown9349]

@@plainsman I'll pray for you.

[@samohtra1]

Faith needed to believe that the ark filled with feces,flies, urine, rotting food and methane gas, animals too many for 8 people to keep from dying. Faith is required to believe all the lies in the Bible fables. Truth doesn't matter to Bible liars who make claims without actual evidence.

[@VisshanVis]

Exactly all that methane, what wasn't asphyxiated would have been blown shy high the first attempt at lighting a cooking fire.

[@Aaronrc1]

If you want proof of the flood, go to the Grand Canyon where you'll find skeletal remains of sea creatures and sea shells on mountain peaks as well as other fossils that don't belong at the tops of mountains. The proof is etched in the earth itself. You find oil and coal in deserts, the sea, and in the frozen landscape, proving the world was once a lush garden. Or you can just deny the proof

[@bruceherdrich4266]

The bilge could have had tall vertical venting pipes with holes at their top for sucking out fumes from the pumping action of surging waves under the sea surface below. They might also serve for waste disposal. Venting could also occur through ducts exhausting through the roof (with open covers above them to keep rain out). Excrement could be composted for fertilizer or some of it manually thrown overboard from the edges of the boat or its hatches, near it's top. There were only 2 of each animal KIND, each with robust genetic diversity for their offspring to adapt into several variations of species of today. They were all small young juveniles and many could hibernate for much of the year, limiting their food intake and defecation. The huge Ark dimensions and limited number of animals shows there were large amounts of excess volume.

[@georgemccreadyprice8195]

Noah’s flood is demonstrably two similar stories woven together It is mythology.

[@thefactsjournal340]

Care to demonstrate for us?

[@diyema3434]

Just leaving this comment here to get the answer when he does say.

[@georgemccreadyprice8195]

@@thefactsjournal340 Certainly. Watch “A tale of two floods” By Milwaukee Atheists. Or Richard Friedmans “Who wrote the bible”. Or Wikipedia “The Noah’s flood narrative”. There you will find the answer.

[@OGDooshbagg]

The biggest problem with the world... People want to believe instead of know.

[@brentad2004]

Because nobody really "KNOWS" anything..they just THINK they do.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@brentad2004 I guess that if you never read and study, you remain ignorant.

[@frenchimp]

@@brentad2004 That's what you think but I know you're wrong.

[@zakkmarchant]

This vid reminds me of that Noah's Ark movie that I forgot the name of

[@markb3786]

Weekend at Bernies?

[@howdydoodey3872]

I missed the movie, but had tickets for "Noah on Ice".

[@gunasaulite22]

Why only animal fossils are found but no human skeletons?

[@kimberlyhovis5864]

Following 👣. I've been wondering this myself.

[@pabunny]

What if they were found, but labeled as "Ice age" people. By those who were lead the wrong direction.

[@nathancook2852]

@@pabunny Dating methods are very accurate. Mislabeling is very rare.

[@ar7067]

The smithsonians i think destroy them because they want us thinking evolution was what happend and not gods word

[@St-uv5bc]

The most likely reason (s) human fossils are not found is because humans most likely survived the longest. As a result, their bodies were not buried in the mud so deeply, if at all, and left exposed to the elements. This allowed the normal processes of decomposition to run their natural course. This coupled with the scavengers still around eating them, would have made quick work of these human bodies and left no traces behind. Another factor to consider is that God's intention for the flood was to annihilate all mankind from the face of the earth. God simply did exactly what He said HE would do. So, it is not surprising that no human remains have been found to this point. Perhaps their are none left to find. They were entirely obliterated by the flood. You should also understand that finding a fossil of a land dwelling, air breathing animal is a very rare occurrence to begin with. I think I have read that that around 99% of the fossils that have been found and catalogued aquatic creatures. So, finding a human fossil would be a kin to finding a needle in a haystack. I'm sure there are more reasons why there are no human fossils being found, these are some of the main reasons.

[@davidgardner863]

Show me a goat and a velociraptor fossils in the same layer and I’ll become a believer.

[@georgebond7777]

No you won't, they'll have a rescue devicefor that

[@raypurchase801]

I can't understand how Noah managed to assemble penguins, polar bears and giant pandas in the small amount of time available.

[@davidgardner863]

@@raypurchase801 , The answer to that is pretty obvious, isn’t it?

[@voiceofreason162]

Pretty sure you won't.... There is evidence dated back to 1880. But try and search engine this stuff they'll tell you to "refine your search." There's nothing wrong with the search. The algorithm is designed to filter it out so you can't find it. Ergo, you draw the conclusion none exists. Programmers are atheists too. Try the Astle Beds as a starting point. Trust me, you'll have to dig deep. And don't be surprised if you are forced to consult a good library and read up the old-fashioned way. It's like treacle on the net. One of the most fascinating fossil graveyard of all is located in the southern United States. The Ashley Beds is an enormous phosphate graveyard that contains mixed remains of man with land and sea animals, notably dinosaurs, pleisosaurs, whales, sharks, rhinos, horses, mastodons, mammoths, porpoises, elephants, deer, pigs, dogs, and sheep. This catalogue of fossils from the phosphate beds was given in the records of Major Edward Willis who displayed them at multiple expositions (Willis, “Fossils and Phosphate Specimens,” 1881.) Professor F.S. Holmes (paleontologist and curator of the College of Charleston’s Natural History Museum) described the fossil graveyard in a report to the Academy of Natural Sciences: “Remains of the hog, the horse and other animals of recent date, *together with human bones mingled with the bones of the mastodon and extinct gigantic lizards* .” There can be little doubt what extinct gigantic lizard he referenced for he pictured a hadrosaurus on the front of his 1870 book The Phosphate Rocks of South Carolina and captioned it: “Skeleton of a Fossil Lizard eighteen feet in Length.” Moreover, on page 31 he wrote, “It was in this Post-Pleiocene age, the period when the American Elephant, or Mammoth, the Mastodon, Rhinoceros, Megathereum, Hadrosaurus, and other gigantic quadrupeds roamed the Carolina forests, and repaired periodically to these Salt-lakes”… (p. 31.) Yet I've never seen the Smithsonian eager to display them. Evolutionists won't publicise the findings..... and you won't believe this, or any other accounts, not today, not ever. Am I right? If you doubt it, try searching for the quotes. The bone listing. The evidence. Your average generation z has no clue what a library is. 30 seconds of search on the net confirm their beliefs. There's no reason to push the boat out and invest an entire minute. What's more, these beds and discoveries are known to MSM and universities. Their response? Shhhhhh.

[@voiceofreason162]

@@raypurchase801 I concede your point. 120 years and a near-connected 5 continents with land bridges would be an enormous barrier. I don't make that 5-continent comment lightly. It took every supercomputer in the US/Aussie arsenal to demo the model for that and despite 3 runs the best they could manage was 28 days of data so they had to restart the modelling at every 27 to progress the model - which works so well, evolutionary displays reuse it and ADD the timeframes rather than displaying the actual movement the runs recorded. Nowhere near 2" to 6" per year. That scenario failed. It only worked at 5-30 mph. It's the model you've seen hundreds of times showing continental splitting. But what is never shown is that isn't an evolution model. So....based on that. Is there enough time now?

[@sherylsocia4496]

Love the info

[@DarrylSteele69]

Hello everyone in the comments section, hope you're all enjoying yourselves. I do enjoy the back and forwards between believers and non believers.

[@chriskourliourod1651]

This is how the mind is refined.

[@raypurchase801]

@@chriskourliourod1651 As a Pastafarian, I agree with you. The video is hilarious, but I respect your right to believe YOUR irrational fantasy if you'll allow me to believe my own.

[@chriskourliourod1651]

Hey, wallow in your own muck all you want, bub. It’s not like you haven’t been told. Remember the parable about the rich man and the eye of the needle?

[@truthgiver8286]

What I want to know is that everyone on earth was killed apart from Noah's and his family but not long after thousands of slaves built the pyramids for the Egyptians where did all the people come from?

[@kenji214245]

Or how we cannot find any dead remains from that time with signs of living a long life as claimed in the bible. . .

[@jml5100]

Well if the Israelites built the pyramids then that was at least 800 years later. So... I also wonder if some of that stuff was around before the flood. Idk if those structures could survive that catastrophe, but I've heard people say the great sphinx looks like it has some serious water erosion and the Pharoah head appears to be more recently developed than the rest of the sphinx. No idea if that's true, but if it is then could it be that some of this stuff was made before the flood? Just a random thought.

[@truthgiver8286]

@@jml5100 The Egyptians built the pyramids and a more sensible random thought would be that the flood story was a myth and never happened more so since a few hundred years earlier the Sumerians had a flood myth where a guy called Atra Hasis built an ark to save his family and animals from a flood sent by the gods.

[@jml5100]

@truthgiver8286 no its completely stupid and scientific to think there was no global flood. So you're dying that hundreds of cultures around the globe just all came up with their own flood story? Or they all independently decided that this would be the story they all passed down generation to generation, despite it not having any basis in reality? That's quite a stretch. People from the middle east to Hawaiians to native Americans to those on the south American continent and everywhere in between have a flood account. The most simple and reasonable explanation is that it happened and everyone's version of the story gives their explanation of why. Obviously they aren't all correct on that second part, but the fact of it does not change. Secondly, how else do you explain marine fossils in the Himalayan mountains? Or in Kansas, right in the land locked middle of the United States? How do you explain the instantaneous fossilization of creatures? Fossilized in the middle of eating out giving birth. Or jellyfish being fossilized? Normally they would just decay fairly quickly because of what they are made of. They would never be around long enough to turn into fossils. Insect wings are another example. The fossil record fits perfectly with a worldwide catastrophe like the flood. Based on geology, it's totally ignorant to say there was no flood. And of course, weather scientists cannot give a reason for an ice age. They can show scientifically the evidence that it happened, but they scratch their heads as to why. But if a flood happened the way the Bible described then that would be something that could meet the required conditions and it would mean an ice age right after the flood. The only reason to not believe there was a global flood is because it gives credit to the Bible. It doesn't prove it, since it doesn't verify the specifics or the "why" behind it, but even just having to admit the Bible isn't crazy on the basics of that story is too much for some people so they have to reject the science as well.

[@haleighsturman2239]

​@@kenji214245what would qualify as signs of a long life? Just curious

[@lyongreene8241]

These people are literally making the case for atheism. If you spend 5 minutes investigating this garbage you'll see that it's all fake and full of lies. Then they have the audacity to say this is the only way to read the Bible or else God doesn't exist and the Bible is false. These people need to repent for this false teaching and for all the harm they've done to the body of Christ. It's just so sad to see.

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

Men are fallible and born into sin but me, a man, has the only correct and true interpretation of the Bible!

[@lyongreene8241]

@@BlGGESTBROTHER Yes it is possible to have a correct and true interpretation of the Bible. God is not a God of confusion and will not with hold wisdom and understanding from those who ask

[@godbyone]

There is a channe Archiax that Lots of evidence and uses bibliographies of catastrophes around the world every so many years

[@nobodysbaby5048]

What's your theory on "The Boneyard"?

[@djb5320]

Even if we grant that there was a major global flood. This does nothing to prove any existence of a god.

[@chriskourliourod1651]

Try looking at Life and our Lord Jesus Christ. There, settled it for ya.

[@djb5320]

@@chriskourliourod1651 When I look at life, everything can be explained through natural causation. I don't know what looking at Jesus Christ means.

[@stellarspacetraveler]

@@djb5320 The real problem is that neither you nor any other atheist scientist can explain the origin of life even to this day in time. So these same atheistic scientists have the same problem that you claim Christians have--neither can scientifically prove the origin of life. So take your pick of the two. You cannot prove or disprove either one. Don't believe me? Then google for the origin of life and send me a link to the discovery. You'll find they only have theories and nothing proven.

[@djb5320]

@@stellarspacetraveler Not knowing something isn't a problem for me. I don't make the claim that there is no God. I just don't accept the claim that there is one. Just like you don't accept the claim for the 1000 other gods that exist.

[@stellarspacetraveler]

@@djb5320 I accept your answer. But I prefer to try to know and find out the truth.

[@matthewgrumbling4993]

In my case, as a scientist, I blindly accepted the Darwinian myth for years until I was seeking an answer to prayer. The Lord spoke to my spirit: “How can you pray in faith when you don’t even take my Word seriously?” At that moment I decided to accept the Whole Word as factual, by faith. Within days I had discovered so much evidence of the veracity of the biblical account of the flood that I cannot imagine ever being persuaded otherwise. The secret then is to approach the word in faith, not with a heart hardened by skeptical bias or prejudice, but open to receiving God’s revelation.

[@bonesrhodes3762]

" At that moment I decided to accept the Whole Word as factual, by faith. " ---- something NO actual scientist would do - that is anathema to the scientific method -

[@plainsman]

Faith is the opposite of science, yet it's also one common element that you will always hear valued in religion. It's the number one most common excuse for holding peculiar superstitious beliefs in spite of the evidence against them, their violations of sense, and their foundation in wishful thinking and rhetorical vapor. It puts ignorance rather than scientific rigor on a pedestal. There was never a global flood to begin with, and as a consequence there was never an ark. Such a flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. For instance, how do you explain the relative ages of mountains? Why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of any such catastrophe during that time.

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

All I read was "I decided on the answer and then warped the data to support it." That's not how science works and I seriously doubt you are a scientist, at least not a good one.

[@bonnie43uk]

@@bonesrhodes3762 it's shocking how many people actually believe this global flood story, here in the UK, it's widely viewed as a myth, .. not so in the States unfortunately.

[@bonnie43uk]

@@BlGGESTBROTHER exactly right.

[@briancarson6761]

Superb !

[@peteralleyman1945]

Superb nonsense.

[@RisenShine-zy7dn]

At the 3 min 16 mark, That's a bit naughty not including the verse before verse 35 which gives much more context to verse 36. Matthew 24 :35-36 "Heaven and earth will pass away but my words will not pass away. But of that day and hour knows no one not even the angels in heaven but my Father only." Then verse 37 goes back to the 'son of man' coming in judgement upon the nation of Israel, ancient Israel 2000 years ago, that occurred in 70 Ad. 2 Peter 3 is about the 2nd coming judgement, absolutely upon the whole world. This includes the heaven and earth passing away. This has NOT yet happened. Absolutely love this channel and love the evidence you show.

[@nathancook2852]

Classic, AIG even quote mines the Bible!

[@theadventuresofbrockinthai4325]

Your video is interesting but I must mention one thing. The seashells you talk about high in the mountains. I read a report many years ago about the seashells on Mount Everest. As it turns out the top of the mountain was actually under the water level and when the Indian subcontinent moved North and pushed it up. An interesting fact, India is not finished moving North.

[@georgebond7777]

Yes but clams in the closed position means they were buried quickly.

[@chriskourliourod1651]

And California is supposedly slipping into the pacific. Good riddance.

[@phillipgray7371]

The flood caused the Continents to break up and move and collide

[@earlysda]

It would have taken millions of years (so Evolutionists say), to push up Mount Everest, thus the seashells would have all eroded away.

[@theadventuresofbrockinthai4325]

@@earlysda, no not at all. They because fossils just like all other animals when they die and are buried for millions of years. Mt Everest is still being pushed upward every year by the Indian subcontinent. When will it end? Hard to say but I doubt I will be around.

[@user-do5ln7ez2d]

AronRa has 8 videos on his KZbin channel that give incontrovertible scientific evidence that the Flood could never have taken place. The makers of this movie should try and answer to AronRa's debunks. But they can't.

[@vebnew]

EXCELLENT

[@TickedOffPriest]

I have yet to hear a good answer for bent rock from the Misotheists.

[@user-do5ln7ez2d]

>> I have yet to hear a good answer for bent rock And here is your answer. It took me 2 minutes to find it in Google: ageofrocks.wordpress.com/2014/12/15/is-folded-sedimentary-rock-evidence-for-a-young-earth/ I have yet hear a good explanation from creationists for why they never look up stuff in the internet instead of simply believe what charlatans like Mr. Snelling (Yes, Mr. - not Dr. Snelling) secrete.

[@johnelliott5859]

Except explanations of a billions year old Earth do a much better job of explaining geology. Only if you have to believe in a literal bible do you have to cherry pick and misrepresent to find evidence to support your beliefs.

[@christianpulido8360]

There is no evidence of the earth being billions of years old. Science experiments are models based on assumptions with simplified calculations and left out data. Theories use models in their experiments that are based on assumptions and not reality. We are taught Occult science, occult math, and occult physics in the so-called educational system.

[@eldonhoward7925]

Sedimentary rock, found all over the world, is evidence of the great flood.

[@plainsman]

No, it's evidence of seas coming and going over many millions of years and those sea beds gradually turning into sedimentary rock.There was never a global flood to begin with, and as a consequence there was never an ark. Such a flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. For instance, how do you explain the relative ages of mountains? Why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of any such catastrophe during that time.

[@chrisgraham2904]

Sedimentary rock is found in various places all over the world, but it is not found everywhere in the world. Most continents of the Earth have been subjected to localized flooding at some point in time, over many millions of years. There is no evidence of a single world-wide flood. Apologists will do anything to try to make their story fit.

[@stevepierce6467]

Actually it is evidence that erosion carried sediment into rivers and then lakes, where over millions of years it turned into rock.

[@somerandom3247]

How have you ruled out local floods, and rain? Also, if the entire world was flooded, where is all that water now?

[@chrisgraham2904]

@@somerandom3247 Yep. The Earth has a finite amount of water and isn't making anymore. The same fixed volume of water is subject to constant evaporation to a gaseous state, then condenses back to liquid water and falls as rain in a never ending cycle. Less than 10% of the Earth's water is frozen as ice and snow at the poles and on mountains. It is estimated that about 25 % of the original Earth's water has been expelled into space over the course of many millions of years and nothing has been identified that could change the rate of loss. Noah's flood, capable of covering the entire earth to the depth of our highest mountains, would require two and a half times more water than the planet possesses from all sources, including the small amount of underground water trapped beneath the Earth's crust. Where could the water have come from?....I couldn't. How did the water disappear in just one year?....it couldn't. Note, that water does not escape into space. Only water vapor can do that. The heat required to vaporize that much water would have incinerated the Earth. The vortex of water vapor leaving the Earth would have dragged Earths entire atmosphere into space along with it, leaving Earth as a barren rock. It's a fun story for Bronze-Age man to ponder in his ignorance. Even more logistically impossible than the story of Santa and his flying reindeer travelling the Earth in 24 hours to deliver many million tons of toys to children. Amazing that any functioning adult can hold a belief in such a fantasy, but then again, we still have "Flat Earthers" walking around in 2023.

[@heinrichheine6137]

We once took our kids to see Ken Hamm and Buddy Davis, and we can’t stop singing that song 🎶 If there really was a worldwide flood, oh what would the evidence be?…

[@Ryan_Nath]

Do you recon the Milky Way rift could of had something to do with the waters coming in ?

[@howdydoodey3872]

Do you mean the Milky Way stars that are thousands of light years away? Noah would have to wait thousands of years for the water to get here. It would arrive at high speed as ice and destroy everything, including an Ark. The Bible would have mentioned ice?

[@joeycan6801]

Yeah, all this would be great if the story was true, unfortunately it’s only an embellished version of the Epic of Gilgamesh written in 1,800 B.C. around 1,000 years before the Hebrew Bible, how many Christians know that ?

[@georgebond7777]

The Australian Aborigines have a global flood story. Since they are considered to be a culture over 40k yrs old, was the Gilgamesh Epic plagiarised from them?

[@stellarspacetraveler]

The whole Gilgamesh-derivation theory is based on the discredited Documentary Hypothesis. So the "Epic of Gilgamesh" came after the Genesis account.

[@joeycan6801]

@@stellarspacetraveler sorry to contradict you, but any archeologists will tell you that the Epic of Gilgamesh was written way before the Hebrew bible….., and if ever someone can prove the contrary it still does not prove that a WW Flood ever took place, it’s just a story, no evidence for it. There are local flood stories, but WW Floods ? Please …….

[@stellarspacetraveler]

@@joeycan6801 Any archeologist? Not so. There is a flood story similar to the Genesis account that was written before the Epic of Gilgamesh. The Epic is fantasy: the boat he built would not have been seaworthy and the main character of the Epic was given eternal life (so where is he now if he was given eternal life?). The Bible, on the other hand, is proven by on-going archaeological digs to be an accurate account of historical places, people and events. Noah's boat design is actually very sea worthy and similar in dimensions to modern oceanliners--Gilgamesh's is not. The allegation that the Epic is older is absolutely not solid. There is significant evidence that the oral tradition contained in parts of Genesis go back to approximately 2000 BC or longer. Genesis mentions a city called Haran. This city was abandoned in about 1800 BC and not occupied again. The fact that Haran is mentioned in Genesis is evidence that the tradition of Abraham leaving Ur goes back to at least 1800 BC. The Genesis account is most certainly older even if there was nothing written, as the Jews had a very solid and reliable tradition of passing historical events orally. Also, whether or not clay or paper was used is not reliable as a dating method, as both methods were also used by the ancient hebrews/israelites.

[@NeilDegrasseTysonWithAKatana]

​@@georgebond7777 Australie is literaly an Island. Of course there was flood frop times to times so of course they were gonna write about it.

[@eric6249]

My understanding is there is a layer of coal around the entire planet at the same depth = a great flood.

[@plainsman]

Your understanding is wildly incorrect. There was never a global flood to begin with, and as a consequence there was never an ark. Such a flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. For instance, how do you explain the relative ages of mountains? Why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of any such catastrophe during that time.

[@somerandom3247]

How would that = a great flood?

[@repealthepatriotact]

Ummm....no. Please stop "my understanding" and get a degree in the natural sciences.

[@wobotnik]

Your "My understanding" doesn't fill me with confidence. I think you need to do some research on that one.

[@howdydoodey3872]

My understanding is that there is no layer of coal around the planet. I may be wrong, but I was right about Trump.

[@jerubaal3333]

Beautiful, Thank you so much!

[@richardprofit6363]

there have CLEARLY been "deluges" in the past, but I think Immanuel Velikovsky's books explain this far better than the idea of rain flooding the entire world..

[@markpetten9777]

I mean if you completely reject science and logic, sure you could see that. Fortunately, rational people see through this nonsense of a biblical flood.

[@harveywabbit9541]

The arc of Osiris (Earth) became the arc of Noah (Earth). The arc of Terah (Earth) is 360 degrees divided into the three seasons of Nahor/Sagittarius (winter constellations of Sagittarius thru Pisces), Abram/Aries (spring constellations of Aries thru Cancer), and Haran/Leo (summer constellations of Leo thru Scorpio). The arc of Osiris/Noah is the five signs associated with winter and the rainy season (150 days). The arc of the covenant is the seven signs associated with summer/nurture season (210 days) of crop production and harvest aka Aries thru Libra (the sacred seven). There are multiple divisions of the year/world throughout the bible.

[@bonesrhodes3762]

@@harveywabbit9541 ---- are those major, minor, or semicircle ? ---

[@harveywabbit9541]

@@bonesrhodes3762 You can make them into as many spheres as you like. Note how the writers used Nahor (snorter) aka horse in Sagittarius to mark the first month of winter. Sagittarius, Aries, and Leo are Fire/Jupiter signs.

[@bonesrhodes3762]

@@harveywabbit9541 I also noted that Huckleberry Hound has 16 letters in his name .

[@harveywabbit9541]

@@bonesrhodes3762 Huckleberry hound is in the bible and he is called Caleb.

[@cmeGordy]

Their is also the evidence of the original Ark though it is not completely intact it still exists.

[@brentad2004]

I guess you mean Ron Wyatt's discovery, I actually went to Ark Encounter, and they did not even mention it-odd.

[@DavidWilliams-mo6dj]

That is not the ark. The ark is actually still pretty much intact it's split in two pieces both pieces are completely encased in ice there's a short time once every year where the ice will receide back enough to where you can see the broken jutting piece of the arc sticking out of the ice. The other portion of the art that had broke off has slid down the Mountainside and remains encased in ice. You won't hear this story because they have removed I've only seen the article a couple of times throughout a period of years. The first two people that stumbled across it were a father and his son they came back down the mountain to try to inform people about it but the Turkish government silenced them. Now whenever you try to research about the remains of the Ark it pulls up that structure that Ron Wyatt found.

[@brentad2004]

@@DavidWilliams-mo6dj Then what the heck is a boat shaped, wooden structure doing on the top of a mountain?

[@DavidWilliams-mo6dj]

@@brentad2004 you got to remember the waters Roche over tops of mountains. It could be another boat that was washed up there pick something possibly damaging it to where it cannot float.

[@DavidWilliams-mo6dj]

@@brentad2004 the original Arc 6 in the very top of the mountain where it came to rest because the waters receded enough to be able to make contact with

[@robertwilliams450]

I watched a program several years ago that talked about the ark and the flood that shown a mountain top with shells normally found in the ocean on a mountain top that wasn't in rock like fossils. I can't remember what country it was in but it was in Eastern Europe

[@plainsman]

Over many millions of years, seas and the creatures in them have come and gone numerous times and as a consequence dead hard-shelled creatures sometimes get fossilized. Also over those many millions of years tectonic movements have uplifted the limestone created from ancient sediments into much higher elevations. It's no big mystery.

[@robertwilliams450]

@@plainsman these weren't fossilized but yes I agree with the tectonics even mount arrat was estimated to be lower than it is today.

[@chrisgraham2904]

@@robertwilliams450 Yes, many mountains were lower than they are today, BILLIONS OF YEARS AGO. Mountains don't pop up out of sea beds in 5,000 years. Please learn a little science.

[@robertwilliams450]

@@chrisgraham2904 I have studied science. All I was doing was passing on that tide bit of infromation to someone who doesn't belive in the Bible and it looks as if I've found one. Birds could have dropped the shells there. There's records of floods in different parts of the world as well and another question to ask is why there is a flood story in South America that predates European contact? If you want to argue the fact that mountains don't "pop up" over night then how do you explain new islands in the pacific that's created by volcanic activity? Then if you factor in plate tectonics and drift you'll notice that aincent man was closer than we realize to other areas thought to be unreachable at the time. And carbon dating just gives you a range with the plus and minus of several years to several hundred years. Just keep trying to cover up and deny the truth and you'll be ok in your little bubble.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@robertwilliams450 "Birds could have dropped..." Serious scientists have researched and studied painstakingly and have found out what actually did happen, not what hypothetically could have happened.

[@waggyquack974]

If you like being patronised, facts twisted to fit and all the hard questions pushed aside then Calvin is your man! I enjoyed this video for the falsity, sophistry and evasion it contained. Great entertainment.

[@stevendelucas6311]

I have difficulty believing that Noah lived to 950 years old.

[@Minifliek]

Answer is he didn't

[@Minifliek]

@@rayhope7957 God is non existent.

[@stevendelucas6311]

@@rayhope7957 ?

[@talonanthony]

Ya think? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@talonanthony]

Ya think? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@readfreak7]

There are some interesting points that are made that I would appreciate if were laid out more in depth. Jumping from point to point without explaining the point makes it a bit hard to follow.

[@georgemccreadyprice8195]

I’ve studied apologetics in depth. I’d be happy to try to elaborate on anything you heard.

[@purebloodedpatriot9352]

While hiking in Israel, at the summit of Tel Tzafit I found a fossilized sea shell. What a beautiful hike it was. Overlooking Gath was breathtaking. Many skeptics don’t want to believe, nor can they. I pray for their eyes to be opened because the hand of Yahweh is overwhelmingly evident.

[@repealthepatriotact]

Ummm...nope. Apparently you haven't read anything about this written by an actual modern-day geologist. Also, the flood story in the bible has long been FACTUALLY shown to have been plagiarized from the ancient Sumerian story in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Only children who have been programmed by the church and brainwashed adults with limited critical thinking and reasoning ability believe the stories in the bible are true. Most of the bible, in fact, has been shown to be largely plagiarized from other older stories and other sources. Even the new testament is hilariously and blatantly stolen form the ancient Egyptians' story of Isis, Osiris, and Horus, as well as being flavored with pagan concepts. Not only that, the Flavian scholars are the ones that actually crafted the whole Jesus myth to promote their own political goals, never dreaming that their lies would take off and become the greatest literary hoax of all time(alongside Islam), creating a worldwide religion that was abused by empires to conquer and destroy cultures and entire countries-Mexico, Canada, Russia, Greece, France, Spain, Italy, Brazil and most parts of South America, the native peoples of North America, the Irish, the Scottish, the Celts, the original immigrants and the now modern United States.......Christianity is a murderous, rights taking, culture suppressing cancer. It has destroyed my family over several generations. Those in my family that cling to their religion are the most judgmental, arrogant, hypocritical, and selfish members, and are only allowed very minimal contact with the rest of us-funerals, weddings, family reunions. Otherwise they are forbidden to interact with our children so that the hate and judgment will not affect them.

[@CM-kf7zg]

⁠@@repealthepatriotacthow is Jesus a myth when there are genuine historical accounts of him? He has been documented by many people who were not even followers of God. So even if you don’t believe he is the messiah how could he be a myth?

[@repealthepatriotact]

@@CM-kf7zg Lol. What? Historians agree that there was a guy named Jesus that existed. However, the stories attributed to him have no historical documentation outside of the New Testament. The records that do exist were written several decades after he died and are based on third hand(or worse) oral stories. The stories you have read in the Bible were written by Josephus Flavius and the Flavian scholars who co-opted the Messiah story and created the entire Jesus myth you have been programmed to believe. There are zero Roman government records of anything about him. Emperor Titus Flavius and the Flavian scholars used their own crafted story to promote the divinity of Titus and to show that Titus was the true Messiah so that the Jews could be brought into line in a non-violent manner. The Roman government was tired of destroying entire Jewish cities and executing supposed Messiahs because of the whole "Messiah" story, so they just made their own guy Messiah. Guess what? Peaceful Jewish citizens. The only way to get out of a cult is to read sources that are not written by fellow believers. You have access to the internet, don't be afraid.....find the truth.

[@kenji214245]

@@CM-kf7zg While there are historical mentions of him the earliest ones didn't show up until 40 years after his death. Which makes it difficult to make them reliable witness accounts.

[@carrotpatch5828]

⁠@@kenji21424540 years is unreliable? Historically speaking, something being only 40 years removed is astonishingly close. The closest documents we have accounting to the life of Caesar are dated to over 100 years after his death, with most of the documents seen as historically accurate being around 900+ years removed from his life.

[@aaronweatherson4379]

...the Bible is true because it says it is...how much more circular could your logic possibly get...?

[@raypurchase801]

As a Pastafarian, I believe the world was made by the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Because He told me so.

[@stellarspacetraveler]

@@raypurchase801 I believe you cannot even explain the origin of life. I believe that you cannot even find a science article written in 2023 or earlier that writes about the discovery of how and where the first living organism suddenly popped into existence. If you can, then provide the link. If you cannot, then you must admit that you also live by faith in "science". It should be easy for you, I mean the earth is literally teeming with the building blocks of proteins that constitute living cells. There should be life just "popping" into existence all the time. So show me how smart you are and just send me the link. I will bet that you can't.

[@raypurchase801]

@@stellarspacetraveler Yeah and the Sun orbits the Earth as well.

[@stellarspacetraveler]

@@raypurchase801 No problem. No scientist has an explanation for the origin of the first living organism. So don't feel bad.

[@harveywabbit9541]

In the beginning, Jupiter created Heaven and Earth (himself). There is no Jupiter outside oneself.

[@mar145gh7]

Y'all wish 😂

[@jordanthejellyfishcash4246]

Why do you have to come onto a Christian video and be a jerk? If you don’t believe just go away. Why bother insulting what someone believes in?

[@aparz617]

@@chriskourliourod1651 oh, the irony.

[@mziad9405]

The word came: "O Noah! Come down (from the Ark) with peace from Us, and blessing on thee and on some of the peoples (who will spring) from those with thee: but (there will be other) peoples to whom We shall grant their pleasures (for a time), but in the end will a grievous penalty reach them from Us."48/1

[@karedo24]

I'm a Creationist. I have one question concerning the "fossil record", better know as the layers from the sedimentation. Where are the remains, bones, or fossils of the humans that inhabited the earth during Noah's time, those that were obviously not on the ark? Are they in the layers as well?

[@aparz617]

Right next to the bones of other creatures from other fairytales.

[@Minifliek]

Somehow not obviously. Somehow this flood also magically sorted the fossils in these layers from simple to increasingly complicated from older to newer layers. Also somehow certain life forms are only found in sediments of certain ages. Something unexplainable by the Ark fable.

[@sabhishek9289]

​​@@Minifliek Hmm No. The layers are not sorted from simple to complex. Not at all. Even Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge pointed out that there is no gradual change through the fossil layers from simple to complex. All the fossilized creatures throughout fossil layers including creatures in the Cambrian period are incredibly complex. Also if you look carefully at the geological layers, you will notice that the creatures are sorted throughout the fossil layers according to their biomes in the ascending order of elevation from bottom to top. As when elevation changes, so does temperature and rainfall, we get a different biomes. This can be reasonably attributed to a global flood as waters gradually ascended and covered the entire earth in the matter of months. Edit: And this global flood would create a geological layer consisting of destroyed biome of creatures on top of another and eventually the whole world would have this same set of geological layer cake.

[@voiceofreason162]

Short answer: yes. But try and search engine this stuff they'll tell you to "refine your search." There's nothing wrong with the search. The algorithm is designed to filter it out so you can't find it. Ergo, you draw the conclusion none exists. Programmers are atheists too. Try the Astle Beds as a starting point. Trust me, you'll have to dig deep. And don't be surprised if you are forced to consult a good library and read up the old-fashioned way. It's like treacle on the net. One of the most fascinating fossil graveyard of all is located in the southern United States. The Ashley Beds is an enormous phosphate graveyard that contains mixed remains of man with land and sea animals, notably dinosaurs, pleisosaurs, whales, sharks, rhinos, horses, mastodons, mammoths, porpoises, elephants, deer, pigs, dogs, and sheep. This catalogue of fossils from the phosphate beds was given in the records of Major Edward Willis who displayed them at multiple expositions (Willis, “Fossils and Phosphate Specimens,” 1881.) Professor F.S. Holmes (paleontologist and curator of the College of Charleston’s Natural History Museum) described the fossil graveyard in a report to the Academy of Natural Sciences: “Remains of the hog, the horse and other animals of recent date, together with human bones mingled with the bones of the mastodon and extinct gigantic lizards.” There can be little doubt what extinct gigantic lizard he referenced for he pictured a hadrosaurus on the front of his 1870 book The Phosphate Rocks of South Carolina and captioned it: “Skeleton of a Fossil Lizard eighteen feet in Length.” Moreover, on page 31 he wrote, “It was in this Post-Pleiocene age, the period when the American Elephant, or Mammoth, the Mastodon, Rhinoceros, Megathereum, Hadrosaurus, and other gigantic quadrupeds roamed the Carolina forests, and repaired periodically to these Salt-lakes”… (p. 31.) If you doubt it, try searching for the quotes. The bone listing. The evidence. Your average generation z has no clue what a library is. 30 seconds of search on the net confirm their beliefs. There's no reason to push the boat out and invest an entire minute. What's more, these beds and discoveries are known to MSM and universities. Their response? Shhhhhh. PS: note the dates of publication. 1880, 1881. In a personal log, dated 1883, over 2 years, two archaeological researchers perplexed by the clash with the 1859 publication, Origin of Species, resolved the problem, in his words, by "sifting out the human bones and throwing them in the river." Others were less physical, but equally dismissive. That's how long the Smithsonian has known. Those fossils will never see the light of day again. And it still happens today. Archaeological site found. Archaeological site trashed. Same reason. God goes, Darwin stays. That's why the world went global on-line in 1990. Control of information. The dumber we are, the better they like it.

[@voiceofreason162]

​@@sabhishek9289 Good points. Experimental data out of Australia demonstrate hydrological sorting. I've seen the experiments. A close fit to observed geologic strata but laid in hours. Slow, dry layering was also tested but fails to stratify.

[@billbrock8547]

A ridiculous misrepresentation.

[@leepreece922]

Unless you have not worked in quarries and mining mate 😮 ur statement does not stand...😊

[@GlobalResistanceCoalition]

Fascinating how Babylonian fairytales have become history according to the simple-minded.

[@torreyintahoe]

There has never been a world wide flood. Noah was a fictional character.

[@AyeTeeJay91]

Lol. Regardless of 6our belief in God there was 100% a worldwide flood. Over 200 ancient writings and texts from all over the world have written history of it. To deny it happened is 100% denial. Whether it was Noah's flood or not is another topic. But it factually happened. O doubt.

[@mikeconley6331]

😂😂😂

[@torreyintahoe]

@@mikeconley6331 Keep laughing and show me a geology book that says there was ever a flood, Gomer.

[@jeffmetz1190]

This is excellent!

[@bigcorky4687]

This guy would make a great used car salesman 😂

[@Bangandthedirtisgone]

Kinda 'average' I'd say...

[@bunglebee1790]

What about insects being on the arc that actually make up most of the bio mass of land creatures? How could all those animals have been kept alive with food and drinking water? How would predators have been fed meat and aggressive animals been kept peaceful? Why would all fish and whales have suffered in the flood? Why would billions of land animals have perished for the sins of man? And all other people who were surely not all evil. Why were they not judged after death as they are after the flood?

[@frenchimp]

Well God did admit he overdid it a bit, and said Ooops I won't do it again, I promise!

[@mmayer4409]

As an amateur arrowhead and artifact collector in north central Mo. I have personally found a few sharks teeth, as have most of the other guys that do this as a hobby…. That has to say something …

[@wobotnik]

Seems like the area was once part of a sea, like most of the state I live in. Or, they were traded by people.

[@taylorthetunafish5737]

It says that you found shark teeth.

[@nathancook2852]

Many places have been underwater in the past, just not all at the same time. Dating methods could give you the age of those teeth. But that means you would have to trust nasty old science...

[@winegoddess55]

Plus there are no traces of monkeys turning into people, or popping into existence out of nowhere. Thank you for this!🙂

[@chrisjohnston5401]

Monkeys don't turn into people. Hence the lack of evidence for that.

[@stevepierce6467]

Yes, you are correct. People did not come from monkeys, but rather people and monkeys came from a common ancestor.

[@nathancook2852]

@@stevepierce6467 They refuse to accept the difference. It sounds better to those who don't know any better if they claim our species came from monkeys. Same with the "popping into existence out of nowhere" bit.

[@ZumbaMamiKS]

Part 4

[@rodrogers6895]

AronRa has 8 videos on his KZbin channel that give incontrovertible scientific evidence that the Flood could never have taken place.

[@johnhorton4089]

Love You Dear Lord God

[@ricknick5318]

God sent in large through our solar system that went around Earth in such a way that it created a title bulge over all the land

[@littleowlgaming-unity-tutorial]

i like he doesnt mention. like normal floods, that we see every year. all over. can account for these "science" cant explain this

[@ralphdavisiii983]

Now they done found there's more water around earth's core than there is on the surface. Could be the water that once flooded the earth.

[@nathancook2852]

No, just no. Wherever you heard that from, don't believe them anymore. Go read an actual scientific article on what you are trying to claim.

[@gordon985]

How about round rocks buried underground all over a tidal bulge moving at around one thousand miles an hour at the equator for a year would make multiple layers of sedimentary layers and round rocks

[@plainsman]

That's scientifically ridiculous.

[@gordon985]

@@plainsman I'm glad you feel like that. Why is it not scientific. Because it's observable testable repeatable falsifiable

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

If all the sediment was made at once then why do we find siltstones on top of sandstones? Did gravity stop working during this year as well?

[@gordon985]

@@BlGGESTBROTHER due to.assive harmonic tidal changes multiple layers would be laid down at the same time it's called hydrologic sorting. An actual science unlike evolutionism. Evidence of the exact same thing is observable at Mt saint Helens. On a smaller scale. Stratification of hundreds of layers from one event.

[@randyreneau2086]

Who wrote second Peter?

[@howdydoodey3872]

Jim, gospel of Jim, the shoe last maker.

[@Pay-It_Forward]

*Most sea life shell fossils on the tops of mountains are radiometric dated to hundreds of Million of years ago, from before the mountains formed, when that ground was under the ocean.*

[@rollajay5301]

If you think about the magnitude, that's scary as