ArmA 3 - Flakpanzer Gepard in Action vs A-10 Thunderbolt II - Air Defence - Warthog - Simulation

[@eaaaaaaaaaaaaaa5]

In real life an A-10 never woud have had a chance. The Gepard or Cheetah was made for killing Warthogs and Su-25 Frogfoots.

[@Suedeifel]

Guess we’ll find out soon enough.

[@speakersound4565]

@@Suedeifel yeah seems like it.

[@jchiblitz9238]

Mig 29 Vs Geppard

[@christophbehrens76]

in real life a) the gepard has no unlimited ammo and b) it would not have to hit the plane - its explosive ammo just creates a wall of shrapnel in front of the plane which it would not pass unharmed or alive

[@aaronwells6608]

Why would it be meant to kill an ALLIED warthog?

[@1337fraggzb00N]

Quite unrealistic. A real Gepard would have shot down the A-10 within a few seconds. My uncle was a tank commander in a Gepard for decades, when he saw this footage, he could only laugh.

[@SlumMattress]

i've read from someone with real life experience that they have ~94% hit chance and very good gunners could shoot the rope used to pull targets for training.

[@karstenlentzsch9242]

As a former Gepard gunner (Richtschütze), I would bet on the A-10. The Gepard's tracking radar cannot track curving targets well. It has a special button for this situation (Ziel kurvt). During this situation the Gepard can hardly shoot and hit. And the A-10 is typically "dancing in the sky" before it aligns with the target and shoots with his fantastic gun. +++ I've personally seen an A-10 in Denmark dancing for minutes on the sky. No chance for a Gepard to track for shooting. +++ Besides that having seen the poor shooting results of our Gepards in training shootings in Todendorf, Germany, I would bet on the A-10 again, even if it flies just straight.

[@1337fraggzb00N]

​@@karstenlentzsch9242 a I was told, an A-10 would be hard to hit but it would be possible. The Gepard has the same problem as all defence systems: oversaturation. At some point you can't shoot all the stuff that is coming to you. The newer models of the Gepard seem to have better targeting computers and lots of other stuff. The system is not bad at all but Germany did what they always do: upgrade a system until it is quite good and then sort it out to replace it by some over-engineered nonsense. Now the Gepard is back in the garage of Krauss-Maffei Wegmann and the Bundeswehr has the Mantis... most likely without ammo. Warum schreiben wir eigentlich Englisch? 🤔

[@xmryder8404]

@@1337fraggzb00N because the English is the Weltsprache and its just an englischsprachiger Kanal on KZbin, you weißt? Have a guten Day

[@1337fraggzb00N]

@@xmryder8404 joa but Karsten is also a German so we könn laber auf Deutsch, weeste? Hau rein, Digga :D

[@rockymilano2071]

What good would flares be against a gun that's locked on with radar?

[@user-lo2ld6yo2j]

Idk

[@jacklarkson4505]

thats true...you need to use chaff.

[@rockymilano2071]

@@jacklarkson4505 if it were heat seeking missiles not radar guided

[@jacklarkson4505]

@@rockymilano2071 flares use for heat seeking if its radar guided u have to use chaff.

[@guruxara7994]

Nothing.

[@Braxton1981]

02:16 yes, don't shoot that A-10, just stand still waiting for it to come, so it can show us "how good is at bombing."

[@karstenlentzsch9242]

The video is fun. As a former Gepard gunner, I'd bet 10:1 up to 20:1 on the A-10. See my detailed answer to 1337fraggzb00N. The A-10 is the Gepard's nightmare. The problem for the Gepard is the curving of the real A-10s. During curving the Gepard cannot compute a shooting solution. Without hand interaction of the Gepard gunner (or commander), the Gepard's tracking radar looses track for curving targets. The Gepard has a button "Ziel kurvt" (engl. "target is curving) to track curving targets. But you cannot shoot during curving. The gunner has to wait until the target does no longer curve (in other words, until it flies straight). The target solution computer then starts to compute, which takes time - more time for the older Gepard B2 with analog computer, less time for the upgraded Gepard 1A2 with digital target computer. Gepard's hit probability increases with shorter distance, slower target, non-curving targets, higher number of Gepard's (such as a Gepard battery of 6 tanks). As with every analog computer, even small physical damage or outage of electronic components, changes the computed solution of the (shooting) differential equation. Hence, the Gepard B2 or B2L (with laser distance tracking) is quite difficult to maintain and calibrate. This has been fixed with the Gepard 1A2 that has a digital target solution computer.

[@masolitude8799]

Wenn ich solch einen Quatsch sehe, frage ich mich: Wer hat hier sein größeres Späßchen...?

[@anwaribrahim3000]

Very2 amazing of A-10 Warthog weapons with seven barrel time action

[@PVC777]

Jagd damit die verdammten Russen zur Hölle .😀

[@chukscharles4100]

I’m watching

[@robincupp6087]

I love these simulations. What game would I play to experience similar quality?

[@ComparedComparison]

SQUAD maybe

[@อาคมมากบุญ-ภ7ฐ]

เป็นแบบนี้ทุกสมัย

[@Reeegon]

great

[@udhoaksa]

Wow 👍👍

[@angelmx9460]

Hola 👍👍💯

[@Kingwing_14]

Next time pls AC-130!!!!

[@pixelatedwolf689]

Gepard would've killed the a10 within the first 15 seconds if it was realistic... Also, apparently dropping bombs from point blank doesn't destroy the aircraft. A-10 must be meta

[@c.m.gordon359]

Why do I never see that A-10 being shot down???

[@Reeegon]

there are a lot videos where it gets destoryed

[@TheDiazDarkness]

And the phalanx is not an anti aircraft system. Is anti missile

[@fendtclaas8689]

You want the pilot to die?

[@rsdrsd5282]

...RELAXING SOUNDS TO SLEEP WITH ,,,ZERO-SARVASM

[@ComparedComparison]

true

[@pebbels3150]

My Game Tank in my german Armeetime ✌️ The best System on world to catch all plane

[@interpl6089]

Good Lies here, Bundeswehr (German Army), Doesn't Use the Gepard Anymore, The Closest to it is Denmark

[@DENVER4245]

NIce

[@kevinwhitaker119]

NUTS... I didn't see any of the 35mm ANTI -- AIRCRAFT ROUNDS EXPLODE...!!??☹️ also the amount of those rounds fired didn't even get a hit on the A10 ... nevermind tho I enjoyed watching the video 🍺😊👍🌎🌏🌍☮️☯️🕊️ Peace man...!!

[@Clipgallery9]

nice video , Do you all know me?

[@mohammadrezakhani2539]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@jorgeamaro7547]

Buenas tardes, pregunto : donde es esto? Donde caen las municiones qué se disparan?

[@TheDiazDarkness]

Es un juego

[@angelgarcia82747]

Es un juego xd

[@gunslinger8903]

On italian TV they've just used this video by mistake saying it's a ukrainian AA against russian planes LOL

[@CARX__AA]

Wow

[@glennauvil5331]

What game is this??

[@kauapires7115]

Minecraft

[@Braxton1981]

ArmA 3

[@mascho1269]

@@Braxton1981 that game looks extreme realistic

[@mohdshem2310]

Sepertinya menggunakan nasa us defense system

[@อาคมมากบุญ-ภ7ฐ]

สำหรับเครื่องบิน

[@valhab2499]

Зенитчик от бога 🤣🤣🤣

[@cb3609]

with all those hits on the a10 ........... it's an armored plane not a tank !!!!!

[@Mox3712]

It is indeed an armored plane - it is designed for CAS (Close Air Support) and so it is expected to get hit so they made it tough enough to be able to withstand quite a pounding.

[@Blind_Hawk]

Hey... I've seen this in Ukraine! Jokes aside this is the clip some people on Twitter and news outlets used as real war footage.

[@getumyebiyo5357]

💪💪💪💪

[@marcosdossantos2807]

Alguém me diz onde é isso é de é real

[@deliverynews7265]

Também quero saber

[@deliverynews7265]

Se descobrir me fala por favor Kkkkkkkk

[@GustavoSantos-hw3qh]

Segundo os comentários é um teste no sistema de defesa

[@deliverynews7265]

@@GustavoSantos-hw3qh teste real?

[@Visoblue]

Isso é um jogo chamado ArmA 3

[@joaofelix1062]

😃👍👍👍👍

[@mikezaid3219]

At war with skynet

[@anderpr]

This is real life?

[@MuhammadAnas46363]

It is experiment on defense system

[@anderpr]

@@MuhammadAnas46363 stfu

[@MuhammadAnas46363]

@@anderpr what's your mean

[@gabri4648]

Is a game

[@redfallenking7231]

Yes it is

[@Jens-sl5je]

Sure an A-10 in a flying tank but a salvo 35mm he destroy it...

[@vipvip8401]

Those state

[@joedsonmartins9224]

O blindado decente é um exército brasileiro usa até uma vergonha para o Brasil

[@bsmart6685]

tom and jerry

[@mrshine8087]

na vida real, um tiro desse gepard ai.... ja teria destruído o a-10 com 2/3 tiros.

[@AP-RSI]

Considering that the cheetah has a computer system that calculates the shots and thus the shots cannot be deflected, the video is pretty BS!

[@yummybatteryacid7012]

Oh your Gepard mod isn't working

[@ГенаЧетырко]

Тунгуска веру!

[@shuchonaacterhalan7842]

😱😱😱😶

[@devileyes7776]

Es real?

[@cuentaprincipal3225]

si

[@stevenmitchell1688]

This is a game it not real

[@TheDiazDarkness]

Really? I had no idea, if only the title or the description would say something about it… wait a minute

[@Braxton1981]

@@TheDiazDarkness Reading? That nasty thing non-millenials do?

[@christiangrabowski7603]

😂👍

[@ГенаЧетырко]

Не верю!

[@ГенаЧетырко]

Переббрал втунгус верю

[@domenikopalecek1101]

Unrealistic 100% BS..... A 10 will be down in 30sec.

[@bbgcars]

GEPARD IS NEARLY 100% HIT PROBABILITY FROM LONG RANGE! Imagine what it would do to this A10 in short range!///FAKE!

[@uweuhrig4184]

Absoluter Blödsinn, der Gepard hat zu viele Treffer erreicht, das Flugzeug ist kampfunfähig. Schwachsinniges PC Spiel

[@marcoantoniocasoles2891]

🤡🤡🤡🤡

[@MacTheDavid]

As a video, unfortunately rather simplistic, boring and repetitive. Like some kind of video game even!

[@Duci66]

FU WAR

[@JackGleason543]

Oh man, he has terrible aim

[@teoderich2]

The Gepard shot the A10 at the first burst down at 5500 meters. The Video is bullshit

[@karstenlentzsch9242]

Definitely not. As a former Gepard gunner, I'd bet 10:1 up to 20:1 on the A-10. See my detailed answer to 1337fraggzb00N. The only chance for Gepard's is in a group of 6 (the typical Gepard batterie) in a much shorter fighting distance of about 1000m-2000m.