Ah yes, I remember the good days. Dogfighting MiG 29s in the YF-12.. The good ol' days
@InevitablePotato6 ай бұрын
Hilarious 😂
@stealthmanx26 ай бұрын
Though not a fighter per say, it had a fighter designation. Just like the FB-111.
@danilon31216 ай бұрын
LOL
@stealthmanx26 ай бұрын
@@danilon3121 LOL to what?
@Invidrule6 ай бұрын
@@stealthmanx2And neither was the Mig-25.
@user-tc9wd4gu1k7 ай бұрын
If you think the blackbird is a fighter, you know nothing.
@mechagoji91297 ай бұрын
yes, but hes talking about the yf-12 which was a variant that was intended to be a fighter/interceptor
@aaronjohn1377 ай бұрын
He wasn't talking about the blackbird. Pay attention.
@davem77227 ай бұрын
@@aaronjohn137 yeah! it was a hypothetical variant 😂😂😂
@mayb3jaz1m7 ай бұрын
Dummy
@aaronjohn1377 ай бұрын
@@davem7722 It's first flight was August 7, 1963. Since it actually flew, that wouldn't make it hypothetical, now would it? 🤔
@throngcleaver2 ай бұрын
I worked at McDonnell Douglas for 23 years. The F-15 airframe was designed for Mach 5, with the expectation of engine technology to catch up.
@Sunopeek2 ай бұрын
Sustained flight or short-term burst? Can pilots even handle that level of g force?
@throngcleaver2 ай бұрын
@Sunopeek Sustained flight. There are no additional G-forces for straight and level flight, other than the one G from gravity. High G-forces in aircraft come from high-rate turns and high-rate pull ups and push overs, and to a lesser extent, rapid acceleration. G loading is a function of velocity and turn radius, so the faster the aircraft, the larger the turn radius needs to be, to maintain a given G load.
@MakerBoyOldBoy2 ай бұрын
The F-15 modifications from the original concept which made it the most successful fighter in history was the result of the very controversial American aviation genius John Boyd. Boyd also created the extraordinary plan to defeat Saddam Hussein's forces. General Schwarzkopf was ordered to follow this plan to encircle and capture the entire enemy army. The general screwed it up but the plan still succeeded. There are several books about John Boyd detailing his rocky journey to create the first effective science based aviation combat research which is the basis for all modern air combat.
@JimGeigerMusic2 ай бұрын
Mach 5…??? Ahahahaha
@CougarCat212 ай бұрын
@@Sunopeekshows your stupidity in your question. High g forces at level straight flight? What a noob question.
@Rocky-rh3rz2 ай бұрын
I just wanna point out: • YF-12 is not a variant of the SR-71 Blackbird , but the predecessor to the SR-71 Blackbird • YF-12 was developed into the A-12. A-12 was later developed into the SR-71 Blackbird.
@terrymalone86938 күн бұрын
YF12 was also a single seater and smaller than the SR 71.
@DirkZeiters2 күн бұрын
We made good jets
@joechapman95182 күн бұрын
Was it designed for fighting?
@AlanDPhdКүн бұрын
@@joechapman9518no the YF12 was totally unarmed. It was a spy plane prototype.
@huberthumphry280Күн бұрын
@@joechapman9518 no, it was designed for testing
@timothyosborn16977 ай бұрын
The YF-12 (test variant only) was a variant of the A-12 Oxcart (single seater CIA) which was the precursor to the SR-71 (two seater USAF).
@coolness80736 ай бұрын
CIA had jets💀
@jeraldjosey6 ай бұрын
@@coolness8073 always had jets 🤫
@scottboyer84506 ай бұрын
Thank you! As always with these short form click bait videos, no fucking research at all.
@davidburton34476 ай бұрын
Fun fact: The A-12 was slightly smaller, flew higher and faster than the SR-71. The blackbird is still my favorite high speed plane though.
@scottboyer84506 ай бұрын
@@davidburton3447 And most of its operational history is still classified.
@mothmagic17 ай бұрын
The English Electric lightning is sadly missing from this. The top speed was only ever published as estimated to be mach 2.2+. Pilots used to say I won't tell you exactly how fast it goes but you'd be surprised if you have the balls to hang on to it at that speed.
@GetOutterMeHouse7 ай бұрын
It has a maximum Mach of 2.27, many fighter jets and interceptors during the Sr-71 era easily hit that. During the Lightnings time which is late 1950-60? For sure it was epicly fast.
@Pizza-Boi7 ай бұрын
SR-71 mach 3.3, MiG 25 mach 3.2, and the MiG 31 mach 2.8
@AllahDoesNotExist7 ай бұрын
It's a shit AI vid, probably Chinese in origin.
@ihavehaxplzdontban24497 ай бұрын
@@Pizza-BoiSR71 is not a fighter💀
@bepbep74187 ай бұрын
@ihavehaxplzdontban2449 the YF-12 (Y=protype)(F=Fighter) was a variant of the A-12 (SR-71) which was in fact a Fighter/Intercepter. 3 were built and tested and "Never Put in Service". Mind you the A12 (bomber) (SR-71) first flew in 1966, and flew missions over Vietnam in 1967. The public didn't know about it until 1998 when Black Shield was declassified.
@yionnecantu2 ай бұрын
The F-15 is unmatched, by far the most dominant fighter ever built.
@jessicaandtrains77682 ай бұрын
Ever built? I'm sure the F22 and SU57 would make minced meat out of it. Modern tech will defeat old tech as it is an evolution in ability and performance.
@spongegobler34492 ай бұрын
@@jessicaandtrains7768Yeah I’d also imagine the Typhoon and Rafael beating it
@jessicaandtrains77682 ай бұрын
@@spongegobler3449 Those would be very interesting one on ones
@SergioPena202 ай бұрын
Considering there’s maybe 20 SU-57’s tops and the F-22 shooting down a weather balloon, I’d say the original comment is true. The F-15 has over 100 air to air kills. Don’t get me wrong, I’m die hard American and the F-22 is the best thing out right now. But in terms of kills, it doesn’t come close to the F-15. If it stays in service long enough, it might reach the same stats. But the F-15 has been in service for 50 years already, that’s a lot of catching up.
@jessicaandtrains77682 ай бұрын
@SergioPena20 An F22 just wiped out 108 opponents in a war games simulation. Including F15s, F16s, F18s. An F15 could never have achieved anything like that. Different times etc. But I believe that justifies it having bragging rights over any F15. It's never had the numbers or the chance to show how exceptionally better it is. An F15 has never had such dominance over opponents.
@AliAzeem-vm2rw6 ай бұрын
F 15 is a battle proven mind blowingly capable jet 🔥🔥
@yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074Ай бұрын
Battle-proven against aged, monkey-model jets flown by pilots with horrid training. Get back to me when they had faced the Soviets. Oh right they never did. Never faced a front-line Soviet jet.
@DavyRo26 күн бұрын
Battle proven against what & who???
@Whatisthishandle-v1l20 күн бұрын
@@DavyRo Israel had used them. That's where the majority of the 104 kills it has comes from
@Sithum_Dulran7 ай бұрын
Moment of silence for those who confuse the A12, YF12 and the SR71…
@B-52H7 ай бұрын
Yes
@exeerror-om6cq6 ай бұрын
Secondary moment of silence for anyone who thinks any of them is a fighter jet
@B-52H6 ай бұрын
@@exeerror-om6cq The YF 12 was supposed to be one
@Sparmink6 ай бұрын
@@exeerror-om6cqYF-12 is a interoceptor
@Stefan-mg5gl6 ай бұрын
None of those 3 had ever been a fighter jet.
@honestjohn11297 ай бұрын
The f15 is a beautiful looking plane
@staggerinstanton567 ай бұрын
A video made by somebody who doesn't know anything. The yf-12 or the SR-71 we're not fighter planes. They were surveillance and research aircraft.
@chronic247 ай бұрын
The eagle is still undefeated. 104 - 0
@Marshall1q.7 ай бұрын
@@staggerinstanton56ong
@scottjoslin13167 ай бұрын
@staggerinstanton56 you also know nothing- the yf-12 did have offensive weapons
@solemnwaltz6 ай бұрын
That's what I was thinking too It's sleek enough to have that modern fighter look, but boxy enough to have some retro character
@reneestevez71935 ай бұрын
The F-15 not only is the fastest jet fighter ever. It has the honor of being the ONLY fighter to EVER having shot down a satellite in orbit!
@RFS-Vids4 күн бұрын
Also in 1983 an f-15 landed with one wing missing and the pilot had no idea he was missing a fricking wing
@jasonfalcon78215 ай бұрын
Nothing comes close to the beauty of the F-15 Eagle every time I hear an F-15 fly over. I know it's the F-15 because of the roar of the engines. My uncle retired as a general flying the F-16 Fighting Falcon/Viper and survived the attack on the Pentagon as well as flew the A-10 Warthog in Desert Storm 91' and was a test pilot in the A-7 Corsair as well as flown the T-38 Talon as an officer which he became as soon as he entered the Airforce.
@dpottinger48743 ай бұрын
Fcm
@JamesOMalley-hb4tf2 ай бұрын
Can you be any more full of fecal matter?
@rwdngnexus22517 күн бұрын
@@dpottinger4874 FCM is Flight Crew Member... Or did you mean FMC, which is Fully Mission Capable?
@rwdngnexus22517 күн бұрын
Honestly, there were a lot of random abbreviations for FCM, but I feel like FMC was the most relatable for the response to @jasonfalcon7821
@joshuaborem70636 ай бұрын
Dude. 2,000mph is about 3,000 feet per second. That’s as fast as a bullet from a rifle. That’s insane.
@cheemomugdoo7996 ай бұрын
Even more insane is that it is possible for a fighter jet to run into its own bullets.
@HYP3R_SPEED5 ай бұрын
@@cheemomugdoo799That is not possible because of momentum.
@cheemomugdoo7995 ай бұрын
@@HYP3R_SPEED well, first of all your sentence makes no sense. Secondly, there is a documented case of an F-111 being hit by its own bullets. Remember, when a bullet leaves the barrel it is slowing down and falling toward the Earth. If you shoot bullets from a moving plane in an upward direction those bullets will lose speed and fall toward the earth, and if you’re diving after firing, you can run into those bullets.
@HYP3R_SPEED5 ай бұрын
@@cheemomugdoo799 I just got absolutely decimated, sorry about my late night ramblings.
@patrickjanuary48655 ай бұрын
It was recorded as faster than a rifle bullet
@rogersiples33357 ай бұрын
The YF-12 almost shot itself down when it traveled faster than the missile it fired.
@mickchuknit3242 ай бұрын
Ear tjat before from someone in the air force right after highschool, but as i understood what he said was that was officially as released to the public it never left the ground, but all the pilots and ground crews in the USAF had heard through rumors and grapvine that it flew so fast that it couldn't fire heat seakers cuz theyd lock on to it and to keep the missiles from tracking it they had to roll to the side and pull back hard on the stick at a certain high rate of speed to create enough distance fast enough with the heat seekers of that time from switching from what it was supposed to be locked onto to the plane because the engines higher heat made the missle switch to tracking rhe plane. And he said most of the pilots couldn't handle the gforce of separation, so they had to slow down to slower than the missiles top speed fire turn and floor it to keep from being shot down which was one reason why it never made it to production
@spikenomoon2 ай бұрын
An F-111 shot it self down with bullets
@throngcleaver2 ай бұрын
@spikenomoon That was an F-11 Tiger, not an F-111. An F-111 crashed because the retractable M61 rotary cannon kept slow firing after retracting it on a diving gun run, so they extended it back out. It had already caused damage and a fire in the weapons bay. They couldn't return to base with the gun firing every few seconds, plus having an internal fire, so they elected to eject. That's almost like shooting yourself down. 😊
@richmoreno64792 ай бұрын
All those missiles in the blackbird. They must’ve shot them all before even climbing because they don’t even have a weapons bay.
@1975KyleDavid2 күн бұрын
I just love how these videos are corrected by aviation enthusiasts, former pilots, and aircraft engineers of the 20th century.
@jasonb59855 ай бұрын
With limited dog fighting these days, it is not about speed anymore. It’s about being able to see the enemy, shoot and splash without ever being seen.
@Dread_Pirate_Homesteader2 ай бұрын
It's why the us will lose
@larrypegg86532 ай бұрын
Sort of true but only for the first few days of a near peer conflict after that Jets that are fast can still get in hit something and get out
@Dread_Pirate_Homesteader2 ай бұрын
@@larrypegg8653 we don't have air superiority
@larrypegg86532 ай бұрын
Yeah I'm going to have to disagree pretty sure we can hold our in any air environment
@Dread_Pirate_Homesteader2 ай бұрын
@@larrypegg8653 nope
@paulmorris59256 ай бұрын
I can remember a time when the SR-71 Blackbird flew from the US to the UK. It flew so fast that it not only overshot the runway, it overshot the UK, and it had to turn around over the Netherlands.
@fukpoeslaw36132 ай бұрын
Oh yeah, I remember that. The pilot asked for directions, but at that time I didn't speak English yet.
@chasechristensen95392 ай бұрын
*spits out drink.* I-I’m sorry??
@sheepdog9162 ай бұрын
@@chasechristensen9539 Dork.
@texgowing73592 ай бұрын
Yes, yes, yes I remember the day it did that. We were all gobsmacked on the ground🤗🤗🤗🤗
@Modelb4302 ай бұрын
.
@LlamaChameleonTTV7 ай бұрын
Here’s a fact. The YF-12 was not designed as a fighter. But a reconnaissance aircraft that could be armed with missiles. Therefore isn’t the fastest fighter.
@bricefleckenstein96666 ай бұрын
The YF-12 was designed as an interceptor version of the A-12 recon bird, NOT as a recon aircraft. The SR-71 was designed as a 2-seat version of the A-12.
@roblockhart61042 ай бұрын
Here's a fact. The 'y' in yf-12 stands for prototype. While, the 'f' stands for fighter. Same goes for the yf-23 and yf-22; the later production version, obviously, being designated the F-22.
@anubis200499992 ай бұрын
@@roblockhart6104Yes, but 12 prototypes aren't needed. They were reconnaissance jets in reality. The F-117 is not a fighter jet but still maintains the fighter F label. Yes, I know whoever came up with this is stupid
@bricefleckenstein96662 ай бұрын
@@roblockhart6104 The USA never had a specific "interceptor" designation in our numbering systems, they got lumped in with fighters for designation. We DID have a specific designation for recon aircraft, R - but it wasn't always used. It WAS used on the SR-71 (Strategic Recon - 71). The A-12 designation was an internal Lockheed one, NOT an "official" designation. Similar situation to bombers, where tactical bombers like the B-26 used the same "B" designation as strategic bimbers like the B-17/B-24/B-29 despite having very different missions.
@bricefleckenstein96662 ай бұрын
@@anubis20049999 The (Y)F-117 used the designation in part to help HIDE it's existence for a long time, if anyone saw the designation in paperwork like Congress they would tend to assume it was (a prototype for) the last of the "century-series" fighters, and a program that started before "the great renumbering",
@Techgameryt2305 сағат бұрын
The editor: 🗿 The audience: 🗿 The Pilot: 🗿🍷 The Jet: 🗿🍷
@user-lo3su2ev3p6 ай бұрын
This deserves a standing ovation.
@MrOrtmeier7 ай бұрын
That F15 is a real gem
@Kosher_Slider7 ай бұрын
There was an Israeli f15 pilot who successfully landed the aircraft (on a runway) after having a wing shot off by a SAM if my memory serves. Most planes nowadays would successfully crash missing a wing.
@Faxmachine3507 ай бұрын
Always was and always will be
@JS-bk7bt7 ай бұрын
@@Faxmachine350 I prefer the Mig-21
@tienta36407 ай бұрын
@@JS-bk7bt Bro you know, in Vietnam war we wash the mig 21 in the ocean and it still fly😂😂😂
@danbrice57 ай бұрын
Strike Eagle ❤
@victorhauk59737 ай бұрын
The most impressive record to my mind was set by the F-15. An F-15 took off from Edwards AFB and reached an altitude of 102,000 feet in 204 secs. This includes the takeoff roll. That’s almost 20 miles up in under 4 minutes.
@brianj.simpson40506 ай бұрын
Had to look that up…didn’t think they could get above 80k feet.
@victorhauk59736 ай бұрын
@@brianj.simpson4050 they can’t. The engines flamed out right about that altitude and the aircraft coasted to 102,000 feet. It was a world record that stood for a long time if it’s been broken.
@SukhoiSU57Felon2 ай бұрын
The F-15 also went so high it shot down a low orbiting satellite.
@azlanbinismail2 ай бұрын
When the aircraft goes above a certain height, do they have an oxygen tank for the engine to help with the burning. Just curious.
@victorhauk59732 ай бұрын
@@azlanbinismail nope.
@UnrealBenjiАй бұрын
1. Highest speed ever recorded (unofficial) on a Blackbird was Mach 3.56 (just under 2400mph) 2. Till this date Blackbird holds the record for fastest aircraft ever. (Set in 1976) 3. A Blackbird is not a fighter jet, it’s just a reconnaissance aircraft.
@alexgasparini45484 күн бұрын
He is talking about the YF-12... Why don't you even bother watching the video and understand it before making useless comments? The YF-12 is the proposed interceptor variant of the A-12, but I bet you don't even know what the A-12 is.
@The_TwinSuns2 ай бұрын
YF-12 was basically a blackbird with missiles strapped to it
@theproatthegame61606 ай бұрын
Top 3 fastest fighter jets ever *that nobody knows about* **proceeds to name the most popular American fighter jet**
@samueljussila6 ай бұрын
AcTuaLly🤓: He mentioned that almost nobody knows the number one and I bet you didn't know it
@MemeGodAzul6 ай бұрын
The s71 isn't the rarely known yf12..
@theproatthegame61606 ай бұрын
@@MemeGodAzul I didn’t mention the yf12 because that variant of the sr71 is a variant that people barely actually know therefore including it into the video is valid
@MemeGodAzul6 ай бұрын
@theproatthegame6160 Which the vid brought up, yes, but you say it like it was the s71. Also, he never said "that nobody knows about." Care to elaborate?
@theproatthegame61606 ай бұрын
@@MemeGodAzul wdym my comment points out how he says “top 3 fastest fighter jets that nobody knows about it” and then immediately says the f15. The varient of the sr71 isn’t well known (there yf12) which makes sense on why it’s there
@JeffSouthEastLouisiana6 ай бұрын
We got several....3 or so HOT on the runway fully Loaded Eagles on our runways 24/7 to protect our Gulf. They do training over my golf course and can only smile. They can get from New Orleans to Houston in minutes. Beautiful.
@danadams64772 ай бұрын
Agent Orange, is that you?
@danieldonahoe23322 ай бұрын
Makes you sleep comfortably doesn't it?
@hamzem2953Ай бұрын
😲🫶🩵 با احترام از ایران 🙂👋
@rom33323 күн бұрын
Gotta give some respect to these pilots
@boltplayz16712 ай бұрын
Ah yes the YF-12, a fighter jet, That sounds about right.
@bradleyrobinson80957 ай бұрын
MiG-31???? Also the YF-12 didn’t go into production and was only a prototype so you could argue that it technically isn’t a fighter jet, but I won’t argue that because by design it’s an interceptor, which is a subclass of fighter jet.
@andrewmetzger18627 ай бұрын
SR-71 Fighter? I guess I missed that one? What were it's armaments?
@Lol-uf4xl7 ай бұрын
Unknown but there were documents of it being a interceptor
@aibpresto7 ай бұрын
It had 3 internal weapon bays for 3 huge AIM-47s
@garlandbright2.0267 ай бұрын
The armaments were (2) .45 pistols that the pilots had in case they got shot down or had to eject over enemy territory. Main purpose of the .45 pistol was too “off” themselves upon capture.
@jasonrhodes97267 ай бұрын
They never told the crews this, but there were no working ejector seats or parachutes.@@garlandbright2.026
@lambo_centernario90647 ай бұрын
@@aibprestoseen some images of some plans to use one of the bays for a vulcan
@OliverFundementalPaperEducatio2 ай бұрын
why is it that USAF never puts super fast planes out of the prototype stage 💀 did anyone else just now notice this?
@alfiebutterworth-cu4ys23 күн бұрын
The mig 25 could do a few flights at mach 3 before the engines had to be replaced because they used hypersonic missile engines which were designed for a very limited amount of time. But they had to use these engines, because the engines the designers requested were denied because either they weren't ready yet or because of budget reasons.
@greggpennington9666 ай бұрын
We still build 'em better than anyone else ! 😊
@DavyRo26 күн бұрын
No you don't, you used to you can't build a flying pig anymore face facts you're yesterday's news
@greggpennington96624 күн бұрын
@@DavyRo I don't agree. I don't recall any recent air combat incidents in which an American built fighter lost to a Russian built product !
@isaachillman18747 ай бұрын
He is also wrong about the Lockheed YF Dash 12, which was able to do a constant speed of Mach 3+.
@vaeience7 ай бұрын
and it was an interceptor
@bepbep74187 ай бұрын
@@vaeienceIntercepters ARE fighter planes.
@Aethericallity7 ай бұрын
@@bepbep7418Mostly yeah, but a fighter is usually something that can turn in less than a decade
@WHATTHEFUCKISAKILOMETERR6 ай бұрын
@@bepbep7418INTERCEPTORS are INTERCEPTORS. FIGHTERS are FIGHTERS.
@Sparmink6 ай бұрын
@@WHATTHEFUCKISAKILOMETERRthe MiG 31 is a interceptor and fighter the YF-12 is a interceptor and fighter anything that’s a interceptor meaning it carries guns and missles and flys fast is automatically a fighter jet
@NightsharperАй бұрын
If the YF-12 was just a prototype it wasn't the fastest and it wasn't a fighter jet it was a bomber 😂
@russyeatman56316 ай бұрын
Neither the YF-12 or the SR-71 Blackbird are "fighters". The "S" is for surveillance. The "R" is for reconnaissance. And the YF-12 did fly - out of Nevada for the Central Intelligence Agency.
@Sparmink6 ай бұрын
So where is the S and R in YF-12? Look idiot if a American jet made by the military has a F in its name it stands for Fighter in this case the YF-12 is a interceptor design that never left the prototype stages
@onnedereuver88672 ай бұрын
F
@RG_aming2 ай бұрын
and what does "F" means in YF then?
@Nuhuh™7 ай бұрын
MiG-25 was made and meant as an interceptor, obviously given that it was made with heavy nickel-steel alloy, only giving it a max G of ~4.5, so it doesnt belong on this list. Same with the MiG-31. Designed as an interceptor and air launched ballistic missile platform, it had never been designed with the intent of both BVR nor close range dogfighting, so it also doesnt belong on the list. the YF-12 was ALSO a high speed interceptor, so it doesnt belong on the list. Only correct one is the F-15. Remember to attend school kids.
@Nikolay_Grigoryev7 ай бұрын
Su-27 beat those records in 1987. Google "su-27 p42".
@jeremiahpurba38826 ай бұрын
So what if it could only pull 4.5g? Interceptors are also fighters even if they can't dogfight (which pilots also wouldn't normally do nowadays). Additionally, the MiG-31 absolutely can be used for bvr with its PESA radar and long-range R-37s. I don't know much about the YF-12 since it wasn't made in large numbers. So, the list would be closer to MiG-25, MiG-31, F-15, or YF-12, MiG-25, MiG-31. Anyways, you should also probably consider staying educated too.
@Sparmink6 ай бұрын
A interceptor is a subclass of fighter jet
@Nuhuh™6 ай бұрын
@@jeremiahpurba3882 The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 (Russian: Микоян и Гуревич МиГ-25; NATO reporting name: Foxbat) is a supersonic interceptor and reconnaissance aircraft that is among the fastest military aircraft to enter service.
@Nuhuh™6 ай бұрын
@@jeremiahpurba3882 dont think it says anything about it being a FIGHTER in there does it buckaroo?
@smirkyglint54372 ай бұрын
Fastest fighter jets ever, proceeds to name a plane that never even went off the ground
@josepherwin51226 ай бұрын
Plans to continue beyond prototype were scrapped when it was mathematically calculated that it could potentially shoot itself by by flying into bullets fired by its own guns because they would lose velocity at a precipitous rate while the place could continue on its course and overtake them, possibly drawing them into its engine intakes.
@APerson-fj6yx7 ай бұрын
The YF-12 was developed from the A-12, also to the others in chat saying the YF-12 was a recon aircraft, no. No it wasn’t.
@adamwest11387 ай бұрын
If you're including the YF-12 as a fighter this list is missing the F-111G. The G model pig had a top speed above Mach 2.5. When I was in the RAAF a photographer mate of mine was responsible for processing the recon camera footage of the Pig. He laughed when I told him the top speed was 2.4 and said to me 'I've seen films with airspeeds way higher than that'
@asssfukcocsukmotherf6 ай бұрын
x-15 mach 6.70 beats everything
@Sparmink6 ай бұрын
The YF-12 is a interceptor but also a fighter jet because it falls under the category of one
@atomsk012 ай бұрын
C'mon, man, #1 is not a fighter jet. Its a goddamn spyplane.
@Mr.COPTY0012 ай бұрын
As An Aviation Historian On Discord, I Knew About The YF-12 But It Not Counted, cuz It's Basically A Prototype
@Nikolay_Grigoryev7 ай бұрын
The f-15 you are talking about is the streak eagle. It's record was beat by the su-27 called the p-42. Top two fastest fighters are the mig 25 and mig 31
@alanwayte4326 ай бұрын
Wrong the English Electric Lightning in tests against F15 14 16 was superior, the statistics quoted for top speed and altitude were deliberately incorrect..
@karlblackwell48197 ай бұрын
Can't believe the F22 didn't make this list🤔
@freeriotillitsbackwards7 ай бұрын
bc its slower..
@Dave-_-7 ай бұрын
because it was not intended to break 2200 km/h...
@pitot0philo2077 ай бұрын
F-22 can break Mach 1 wall without Afterburner(super cruising), but it's not intended to reach over Mach 3 or so
@francissteger16367 ай бұрын
I thought it was fastest? F-22
@Sparmink6 ай бұрын
Top speed of an empty F-22 is Mach 2.3
@Ramo07812 ай бұрын
The star fighter needs recognition..in this..
@donotneed2250Ай бұрын
Imagine a jet running up on you and blowing your canopy off, circles around and gets a kill shot before you finish realizing what is going on...
@alenkerr85336 ай бұрын
You've got to love the f15
@jqmachgunner25772 ай бұрын
The Mig-25 and F-15 still can't outrun today's missiles.
@Tnums23 күн бұрын
The sr-71 blackbird,nasa x-15 and x-43: are we a joke
@fraserhenderson78397 ай бұрын
F15 needs afterburner, true cruise speed much lower, F22 makes 1500 on supercruise, effectively a faster aircraft.
@thomaslake29467 ай бұрын
F15 top speed depends on air temperature 1650-1800 mph
@simonm14477 ай бұрын
@@thomaslake2946jets can only fly that fast in high altitude anyways. The 71 also needed the high altitude to reach top speed. Further down the air is not thin enough and the drag would be far too big.
@blackwing29637 ай бұрын
That’s wasn’t the point though it was what jet was the fastest
@Repented0087 ай бұрын
Faster perhaps, effective? Not so much. Not with that baby payload. The Eagle can literally double as a bomber. Raptor is only good for interceptor A2A and possibly to kill ships. Felon is way faster on paper at least.
@josephobrien9427 ай бұрын
Anyone paying attention knows the raptor is the winner
@Jawzzy7 ай бұрын
Mig-31 is the king of speed. heck, F-15 isn't even faster than the Mig-23.
@Unclesamswingman7 ай бұрын
Yes it is the F-15 can go up to Mach 2.5 while the MiG-23 can only go to Mach 2.4 and the king of speed is the SR-71 with a top speed of Mach 3.5
@Jawzzy7 ай бұрын
You are making stuff up. The testers at Constant Peg who tested the Mig-23 said it was faster than F-15 and all fighters in service USA had at the time.@@Unclesamswingman Mig-31 is Mach 2.8 fighter and heads and shoulders above what F-15 can do.
@Unclesamswingman7 ай бұрын
The MiG-31 foxhound is an interceptor not a fighter and the pilots at constant peg said that the mig-23 had faster acceleration than us fighters but they were not faster
@Jawzzy7 ай бұрын
It's funy you would disqualify the Mig-31 as "interceptor", while not disqualifying the A-12 that was not even close to being a fighter. Your bias is blinding you. Mig-31 is the fastest fighter in service on the planet and it's been the top dog for decades. @@Unclesamswingman
@Unclesamswingman7 ай бұрын
Seeing how I have not said a word about the A-12 and the YF-12 was the plane capable of Mach 3 and firing missiles I would consider it a interceptor and the mig-31 is not maneuverable and has very large engines and has big air to air missiles it is a interceptor and I’m not saying it’s a bad plane Im just saying it is not a fighter
@RTM6618 күн бұрын
I can go from Detroit to Alabama in 30 minutes😂😂😂
@stronglikebull29943 ай бұрын
The YF-12/SR-71 also lands on the ground, which also makes it the world's fastest tank.
@Shinobubu7 ай бұрын
Mig 25 doesn't count since it's not sustained flight but a SPURT. an exploding plane can also reach Mach 3 but in every direction.
@patriktoth62587 ай бұрын
It counts. Since those engines are basically cruise missile engines..Easily replacable. Mig25 were basically made for this. Since it landed after the Mach 3.2 incident it counts. While the Yf12 and Sr71 is not a fighter,but a spy plane.
@smartalek1807 ай бұрын
...and for a very ltd span of time.
@ComeAndTakeIt92357 ай бұрын
@@patriktoth6258the yf-12 was an fighter version to the a12
@kokosnh11706 ай бұрын
It could sustain 2.8-2.9, without damaging the engines, so still way faster then F-15.
@JokerX1266 ай бұрын
@@patriktoth6258it was Russia's attempt at keeping up with the sr71 but they built something that could only fly that fast for a few seconds and was immediately a useless plane.
@jimgraham67227 ай бұрын
The F111C could do M2.5 at a canter
@MESՏENGER2 ай бұрын
Su 27 And Su 57 are still sexy as hell
@theshaddocks56052 ай бұрын
On December 15, 1959, Col. Joe Rogers achieved a world speed record of 1,525.695 mph (mach 2.41) while piloting an F-106A Delta Dart. This aircraft remains the fastest single-engine turbojet-powered airplane.
@WTH18127 ай бұрын
Missing: Sopwith Camel, Mach 11.3
@nofwild63257 ай бұрын
12.3*
@ericsmith83737 ай бұрын
Snoopy's doghouse. Mach: Linus's Blanket.
@WTH18127 ай бұрын
@@ericsmith8373 ,.. Linus's blanket is the Stealth coating.
@Sparmink6 ай бұрын
I don’t know if there is a joke here I never heard about or if your just pulling numbers out of your ass
@IContGame7 ай бұрын
Valkrine has left the chat
@bittercad11377 ай бұрын
It never entered full service and was only a test aircraft. So if we are going to include the Valkyrie should we not also include the X-15 which hit mach 6.75?
@pauly7 ай бұрын
The X-15 was a rocket plane. I don’t think that counts
@justmedude3107 ай бұрын
@@bittercad1137 The YF 12 didn’t enter Full service either it was just a prototype, so why does it count but not the Valkyrie the answer is because the Valkyrie is a bomber
@firefly4f47 ай бұрын
Valkyrie was a bomber, not a fighter.
@Shadow7676-t5f26 күн бұрын
The Black bird Is one of the fastest built and was never shot down once during the time it was in service.
@williamrodrigues29022 ай бұрын
America was so scared of the Mig 29, it spawned the F-15. How crazy is that? The F-15 is still a formidable fighter today.
@vengefulgrape75122 ай бұрын
The mig 29 was made to counter the F16. The f15 was made to compete with the Mig 25
@williamrodrigues29022 ай бұрын
@vengefulgrape7512 yes you're right. I always confuse the numbers. Thanks for the correction.
@catjudo17 ай бұрын
The YF-12 was developed from the A-12 spy plane, while the SR-71 combined features of the YF-12 and the A-12 to create a better spy plane. All three are remarkable.
@danieldonahoe23327 ай бұрын
YF-12 ( F for the fighter ) had 4 missiles in its belly to shoot down ICBMs. SSsshhh.... That's a secret. Believe it.
@bricefleckenstein96666 ай бұрын
@@danieldonahoe2332 No, it had those missiles to shoot down Soviet BOMBERS, especially the Backfire supersonic bomber.
@dallasyap30642 ай бұрын
Except that SR-71 was the only that had a long successful service. The A-12 only in service for 2 years then retired. The YF-12 never went through production. The M-21 well technically was kind of a failure coz an accident led to its retirement and B-52s taking over its job. Plus the D-21 all crashed in USSR & PRC.
@garlandbright2.0267 ай бұрын
X-wing fighter left the chat.
@plumpdog10247 ай бұрын
That’s not real tho
@garlandbright2.0267 ай бұрын
@@plumpdog1024 You don’t believe in the force. The force is all around us, binds us. The energy flowing through us. That rock. That tree. All around.
@plumpdog10247 ай бұрын
@@garlandbright2.026 I think your talking about gravity
@garlandbright2.0267 ай бұрын
@@plumpdog1024 🤣👍
@californiadreaming92167 ай бұрын
@@garlandbright2.026the greatest force is found in a can of premium beer 😅.
@ErmsigmafuxАй бұрын
F14:your dad its here
@DelDuio2 ай бұрын
Don’t forget the F-12-Chicken in Ethiopia. Nothing’s faster to this day!
@tanpengjoo72056 ай бұрын
MADE IN USA ALWAYS POWERFUL N BEAUTIFUL
@SeamusMcGillicuddy02 ай бұрын
Until the traitorous Democraps sell the technology to the Ruskies and/or the ChiComm’s !
@user-kx3wm4ep3t7 ай бұрын
AND WHAT ABOUT THE "X PLANES OR JETS "?
@zackwilliams50637 ай бұрын
Those aren't fighter jets. Just like the number one on this list is not a fighter.
@yoslauda47147 ай бұрын
X is just a concept plane that will go to Y phase , then Y phase is more of "almost going to production" planes And Yes that's why XB77 valkyrie or X-43A wasn't on the list
@hmr200subs7 ай бұрын
@@zackwilliams5063Ffs, this list mentions the YF-12, a version of the SR-71 that served the interceptor role and carried 3x AIM-47s.
@dallasyap30642 ай бұрын
X means they're experimental planes, not even prototype.
@user-my4hb3by6e2 ай бұрын
The second one is the reason why F-16 existed
@DefaultNPC142 ай бұрын
I know nothing about planes but starscream turns into an f-15 eagle
@vengefulgrape75122 ай бұрын
No? He turns into an f22
@leseanlittrell43097 ай бұрын
I didn't know the sr71 could shoot down aircrafts with its camera.
@darklite73837 ай бұрын
i dont recall the video talking about the sr-71
@leseanlittrell43097 ай бұрын
@@darklite7383 yf-12 a variant of the sr-71 is still not a fighter. It's weapon is a camera.
@LiPo50006 ай бұрын
Really, it's mentioned several times!@@darklite7383
@mistrsynistr76446 ай бұрын
@@leseanlittrell4309 YF12 was built to be equipped with missiles, not cameras.
@-007-27 ай бұрын
The YF12 wasn't a "fighter" jet. Jet yes, fighter no.
@hmr200subs7 ай бұрын
Ffs, this list mentions the YF-12, a version of the SR-71 that served the interceptor role and carried 3x AIM-47s.
@mattuw827 ай бұрын
It was designed to use air to air missiles and gas an F designation. Why isn't it a fighter? I guess you could more accurately call in an interceptor, but that's kind of pedantic.
@WHATTHEFUCKISAKILOMETERR6 ай бұрын
@@mattuw82by your logic all interceptors should be fighters
@mattuw826 ай бұрын
@@WHATTHEFUCKISAKILOMETERR yes, they are. Interceptors are a sub-category of fighters that are fast and have a high service ceiling for intercepting planes other than other fighters, such as bombers and reconnaissance aircraft.
@rtaylor21774 ай бұрын
Ive invented a plane in my head that goes a million mph , thats definitely the fastest plane ever .
@vengefulgrape75122 ай бұрын
Unlike your imaginary plane the YF12 was actually built and tested.
@WWG1WGA1362 ай бұрын
There are still top secret aircraft from back then that you will never know about.
@PythonPlayzTheFirst7 ай бұрын
The YF-12 was an interceptor, not a fighter.
@aibpresto7 ай бұрын
So was the Mig-25
@vengefulgrape75122 ай бұрын
"An interceptor aircraft, or simply interceptor, is a type of fighter aircraft designed specifically for the defensive interception role against an attacking enemy aircraft, particularly bombers and reconnaissance aircraft" so yes. By definition it is a fighter aircraft.
@maumaumau39297 ай бұрын
Mig 25 is fastest fighting jet becous yf12 wss not a fighter jet
@blue98jettavr6t7 ай бұрын
Yf 12 was to be an interceptor. Unlike the sr71, the yf 12 was to carry 3 missiles. Therefore designated a fighter jet unlike its sibling with the amazing camera.
@MrTheblackopsdude7 ай бұрын
The YF-12 was an interceptor, but never entered production. Three prototypes were produced and set several speed and altitude records before being retired. Never saw active use, but was technically a fighter on paper. The MiG-25 is the fastest production fighter though.
@ppvk26107 ай бұрын
Well how about the Mig-31? Isn't that one faster then a F-15?
@aibpresto7 ай бұрын
The Mig-25 was an interceptor, just like the YF-12
@issness19 күн бұрын
That speed can get you from Boston to San Francisco in less then 2 hours......
@XxJellyGuyxX28 күн бұрын
The su-57 looks rlly cool
@Matcha_Biscuit7 ай бұрын
Yep, the YF-12 was definitely a fighter jet amirite
@Jawzzy7 ай бұрын
No it wasn't. It was a prototype. It nevewr went in service. The Y in front of F tells us that.
@artemiscool677 ай бұрын
@@Jawzzythat's not why it wasn't a fighter jet. It wasn't a fighter jet b/c it wasn't a fighter jet... it wasn't meant for dogfighting or ground strikes.
@Matcha_Biscuit7 ай бұрын
@@Jawzzy I’m being sarcastic
@Matcha_Biscuit7 ай бұрын
@@artemiscool67 that’s not right either, it wasn’t a fighter because the project couldn’t successfully make the A-12 a fighter. The XB-70 was a bomber before the program was shut down. It being a prototype doesn’t make it not a bomber
@artemiscool677 ай бұрын
@@Matcha_Biscuit Your second sentence doesn't counter what I said. And being a prototype makes it lose its designation. It's like calling Iran's faux 'stealth jet' an actual stealth jet just b/c that was its program focus. EDIT and I thought you were being sarcastic about the bird 'definitely being a fighter jet'
@kevint19117 ай бұрын
If you claim a fighter plane that never even got to the prototype stage counts then why don’t you claim Darkstar fro Top Gun Maverick? He went Mach 10.
@Cgn_26107 ай бұрын
Thats a movie
@garlandbright2.0267 ай бұрын
@@Cgn_2610Is it a movie or do they want you to think it’s only in the movies? Hmmm? Are you sure about that?
@why85697 ай бұрын
@@garlandbright2.026Yes
@bricefleckenstein96666 ай бұрын
3 prototypes of the YF-12 were built. One set SPEED RECORDS around 1964.
@micahcastillo91132 ай бұрын
The F-15 can actually reach 1,875 mph high and clean.
@caramwigdorsky2 ай бұрын
F-15 is just pure bliss
@dbcooper0302 ай бұрын
The SR71 was a reconnaissance aircraft, its speed, flying at high altitude (85,000ft), and somewhat stealthy design was meant for one purpose and that was to outrun any Soviet SAM or air to air missile from the Soviets fastest plane, the MiG25.
@liamplayzyes55247 ай бұрын
first
@jamesbarisitz47942 ай бұрын
It kept overtaking it's own missiles.
@kevinclause4p55p52 ай бұрын
Thank you sportsman's guide for the tables!
@tntbomb99336 ай бұрын
The yf 2 never left PROTOTYPE stage
@vieuxacadian94553 күн бұрын
I know the F15 from my AF days. Loved it .
@JUSTWATER5102 ай бұрын
him :"almost no one knows about" also him: says the most commonly named fighters in the world
@user-pk7bi8nt3e4 күн бұрын
Blackbird is a spy jet, not a fighter
@benjaminromberg20912 ай бұрын
The blackbird was a spy plane, unless they had other plans for it on the drawing board, best plane built in it’s time!
@funnyamigos2 ай бұрын
Me playing gta with the F 160 raju 😂
@johng12162 ай бұрын
If bullets travel at 3,000 feet per second, how come John Wick can dodge them from 10 feet away?
@diatribe1142 ай бұрын
Fun fact, The F-15 when flown by an American or European has never been shot down by a Mig
@kevinclause4p55p52 ай бұрын
I can't wait for the gun industry to make a bump stock pistol brace! They can call it bump brace.
@RandomVideosKingdom20 күн бұрын
My dad was in the gulf war, as a nuclear engineer knowing many things about the military, one of which is the fact the f15 can go mach 5, and the dark star and yf12 could probably go mach 7-8
@craftyukraineАй бұрын
These sru-57 look funny. How many of these are left? Three? Our cardboard drones will do them too.😂
@rickjames182 ай бұрын
The new F-15EX can hit 2.5 without afterburners. That’s crazy!!
@TheRealArtimusKnight2 ай бұрын
To think the F15 was built to counter what America thought was the super fighter that was the MiG-25, which turned out to be a glass tiger. But in the process America built the greatest fighter jet ever