Army 2030

[@Schneids1216]

I’m in the national guard and my particular unit is being disbanded and reorganized into a focused artillery unit in next 3 years. As I’m only a SPC, I am not able to really elaborate more about the details however this video explains why this is happening and in fact gives me a great deal of comfort knowing our army has not lost it’s edge in being the most advanced fighting force and the future’s security shall be maintained. I am even considering requesting through my coc that this video be presented to everyone in the battery cuz it made me want to extend my contact so that I can witness and be a part of the Army 2030. Definitely inspiring!

[@Legionare]

"Lost its edge"? Just ask a Pashtun

[@MarcosElMalo2]

@@Legionare Cope, seditionist and/or Ivan.

[@tonyaughney8945]

All that and you're going to be sacrificed in a needless war for israel.

[@johnd2058]

From a vet: hoo-ah, high-speed!

[@SouvenTudu1]

​@@Legionare*Taliban

[@yordan9669]

Multiple, simultaneous, devastating, defensive, deep strikes!

[@JAMESMARCALLINUS]

I am glad that i have ARMY 2030 and strategy that guide me to winning good future.

[@brdd514]

Love seeing the retired/discharged and boarded former members in the chat rant on things they're not read in on nor understand. Keep up the internet trolling while you complain at the VA, thank you for your 2-3 years of service, your opinion is valuable...

[@OakInch]

That wasn't actually a defense of this awful PR video. The first thing you should have noticed in this "reorg" was the complete lack of numbers or actual capabilities given on any topic. This video was made for people who don't know anything about anything, and only they would attempt to defend it.

[@brdd514]

@@OakInch That’s what manuals are for.. literally… hundreds of pages explaining in detail… The video is an intro, a preface, that thing you read at the beginning of a manual. It’s purpose wasn’t to spoon feed you everything, because that’s on you to do your own reading. Whether it’s at ILE or on your own. (Insert Reading Rainbow Music)

[@OakInch]

@@brdd514 Your entire defense of this video is an admission that it is as uninformative and PR centric as everyone says it is. There is no doubt in my mind I would have to look elsewhere for any actual information. I rest my case.

[@brdd514]

@@OakInch then why are you ripping on it? We agree it’s an intro, not suppose to have details. Were you expecting detail? Are you mad it’s didn’t have detail? Did you think they’d publicly release a video with detailed information? And that they’d sum it up in 15min? Why are you mad about it not meeting your unrealistic expectations? Are you that out of touch?

[@jerrymiller9039]

Better than yours

[@angelostriandos6659]

We will learn a lot ! Thank you from Bulgaria !

[@alecmoriarty]

Very insightful! It’ll be interesting to see how these changes affect training and missions, specially training in garrison

[@John_Hemingway]

1:00 Not sure I like the US Army's predictions for the UK and particularly Wales in 2030 😱

[@SouvenTudu1]

😂

[@johnd2058]

Shoutout from NCD & NAFO, we are SO h... stood up right now!

[@davidkinane6307]

Poor old Wales, didn't stand a chance

[@hmill70]

This wets my noodle

[@acegentry9151]

Crossing This Video Made My Gap Wet

[@이하늘-c3g]

It is way point 2028. I want to see waypoint 2030's new organization.

[@robertcampbell5748]

Infantry loves rainy situations

[@biswajitbhattavharjya2115]

Nice concept.

[@matthewmorris6378]

8:33 oof, made it half-way before I couldn't ignore that this is Pooling 2.0: AI boogaloo (tongue-in-cheek reference to a similar doctrine we used going into WWII, only to stop using it on first contact because of conditions on the ground. Lets not make the same mistake hoping AI and superior ISR will save us this time?) I would highly encourage developing TTPs that enable and empower Company-level commanders to maintain initiative with organic (not assigned) material and manpower across this new spectrum of warfare. This was part of our lessons-learned from WWII, Vietnam, and even the most recent OEF and OIF. It would ideally include material and manpower to conduct ISR, process, proliferate up and across, identify vulnerabilities, and exploit those to accomplish a dynamic piece of the commander's objective within scope of the domains available to the unit to action safely. A practical analogy to this would be soldiers deciding to become a step so another can vault a wall vs needing an officer to assign specific soldiers to be the steps and another to be helped up. The first example shows soldiers who share a common mission who communicate among themselves efficiently to negotiate how to approach and clear the obstacle. ISR, processing, and decisioning is collaborative and self-auditing with accomplishing the goal in mind. The second example centralizes ISR, processing, and decision-making, which ensures efficient use of limited resources, but has a single point of failure. Our maneuver elements will need to approach the level of intuitive cooperation shown in the first example in order to maintain the advantages of multi-domain warfare when comms inevitably get disrupted and units find themselves cut off from a very vertical command structure.

[@DaveSCameron]

My mind flying back to every war I've studied that mentions the generals fighting that previous war. Let's all hope we don't discover if this quilt and his ilk are evolutionary geniuses! 😂

[@johnmarston2616]

Great info

[@ashvandal5697]

As much as I love having access to this stuff I hope it’s not teaching our enemies how to actually be good.

[@Ben942K]

Are enemies are still bad and need a time out

[@illaeh]

So whatever is happening is going to happen by 2030?

[@henrygonzalez360]

Way before then sorry to say.

[@FarmerDrew]

1:49 that place got shot up? They made such good chicken shawarma there.

[@adammyers3453]

NoP satellite wars, let’s go!

[@strassmanncai]

US army is very capable at proposing new theory, while PLA is very capable at making that from PPT to reality.

[@vatodanelia5411]

So US Army in 2030 will turn from ABCTs to Divisions to deal with threaths probably this divisions will be sent to europe in Poland and will be strongest power for Nato Response Forces to deal russian agression

[@vatodanelia5411]

But how can armu deal with such competition with 14 ABCTs which 4 arme from NG much more armoured brigades are neccesary to become more lethal force

[@Dhouston1125]

NATO is the aggressor.

[@MarcosElMalo2]

@@vatodanelia5411 I’ll point out three things: 1) NATO is defensive in nature and it’s deterrence value has always been its collective coordination. Forward stationed U.S. units have been a numerically small component for a while now. Not numerically insignificant, but not the bulk of forces protecting Europe. 2) The Russian threat is diminishing itself on a daily basis. The Red Army is a shadow of a shadow of its former self. 3) NATO is becoming less dependent on the U.S. at the same time it is experiencing a revival. This last point is a good thing for both the countries of Europe and the U.S. With Russia so weakened, the U.S. doesn’t have to be Europe’s shield (other than for nuclear deterrence and to a certain extent, air power).

[@bermanmo6237]

Task and Purpose had a similar webcast called Pentration Division that had some of the same graphics.

[@bermanmo6237]

Sorry, it is Battle Order

[@samsunsatrancokulu4772]

Nucklear submarines🇺🇸 important. İnşallah kullanmak zorunda kalmayız.

[@yongdopark8083]

Myfamily loving

[@Doug-ki6ob]

Decision Centric. Multi-Domain::OPERATION KONCKEPTSS.

[@Doug-ki6ob]

NationalReserves...go...go...go

[@bjohnson8467]

Probaly will be over budget and severely behind schedule if its not killed off by the lack of public will to fight another "forever war" or whatever near-peer means now.

[@Charles-pf7zy]

People said the same thing when the army reorganized in the 70s after the vietnam disaster

[@samsunsatrancokulu4772]

We are using Aı good thinks. Medical, brain, future defense big operations. Dont worry we are good 🇺🇸people. Thanks🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 ❤👍

[@samsunsatrancokulu4772]

I like This. Nice🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍

[@marksheen4873]

I’m terrified to see how bad the army of 2030 will be

[@Ravi9A]

What a mess. One good crisis and all of this fragility falls like a piece of cards.

[@henrygonzalez360]

No more fighting goat herders in flipflops and AKs anymore.

[@elzatatarinov1837]

Stop cyber crime

[@BuddyLee23]

What happens if/when Murphy’s Law kicks in and this complex interconnected system breaks down, partly or even entirely? Hopefully, all this otherwise justifiable sophistication is not creating more potential for its many components to be essentially blind and helpless if something like a decapitation strike occurs. I assume we cannot simply try to power cycle this impressive system of systems for a reboot lol.

[@Legionare]

Like when China knocks out a few of our satellites ?

[@Charles-pf7zy]

Your exact question could have pertained to any time in history a military has reorganized. F

[@DaveSCameron]

Ambitious or..?

[@johndilivio2770]

Does army have any ammo left usa no industrial base left

[@MarcosElMalo2]

Incorrect, Ivan. Check your facts before making blanket assertions.

[@teeheeteeheeish]

Its about the only thing that we do still make

[@origamimambo545]

Sure Boris, America is not like the drunks in Russia.

[@Charles-pf7zy]

You have no idea world trade exists

[@flyingdragon713]

Why would you tell your enemies your future strategic goals and layout all your capabilities and to make it worst write it on a pamphlet to teach the enemies all that you have done and going to do? All this sharing of information just advanced your enemies capabilities and they're already working on technologies to counter everything yall just said... and then we wonder why our enemies are so advanced...

[@Charles-pf7zy]

Field manuals have existed in western militaries for hundreds of years. The crucial details are classified. Being completely silent and refusing to engage with the public is a show of weakness and degrades the militaries goal of deterrence. That’s why China shows off every new toy in their military parades. Beating your chest is part of the game.

[@beaumontgile5886]

They aren't telling them anything they don't want them to know or can use against them....they have teams of people who just go through possible angels against them all day all the time

[@kubrickenigma7977]

Without quality people coming in droves to the recruitment offices, this awesome and ambitious plan may collapse from there being too few hands to support its establishment, internalisation and longterm martial enculturation of expert readiness. If the American economy should soon collapse further into recession and, God forbid, into outright depression (what, with the knee capping economic effect ballooning inflation and all) it may be possible that young people actually will enlist en mass just for the sake of a steady paycheck (+ benefits) and to offset their chances of university loan debt traps. And as for those of officer material (or at least those possessing a BA or nearly), the same could be said.

[@Dhouston1125]

exactly - whites have woken up and will not again fight for ZOG

[@TennysonLouis-s6p]

Jones Kevin Lee Ronald Lewis Ronald

[@formwiz7096]

Back to WWII. BCT = RCT.

[@johndilivio2770]

Can drones and hypersonic missiles defeat usa army

[@MarcosElMalo2]

No, Ivan.

[@Charles-pf7zy]

Only if they stand in place and behave predictably like ai soldiers in a video game

[@PochoNieves]

Hypersonic missiles are very expensive and are mainly for sea power. They can be adapt to ground but again very expensive and it doesn't make sense for ground campaigns. Drones can only carry so much payload and can be easily disrupted by EW.

[@danielcabrera5348]

Division size cant compete with peer brigade competers

[@samsunsatrancokulu4772]

Pls heroes commanders add Aİ plan b🇺🇸😉👍

[@samsunsatrancokulu4772]

Pls tell nato they are work different war tactics. Birimiz olmazsa öbürüsü hem şaşırtır(sağ gösterip sol vururuz)hemde de daha kolay kazanırız. R thanks🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 and Nato👍

[@danwelterweight4137]

You can organize your army as much as you want if you don't have the massive industrial manufacturing capacity base to mass produce equipment and ammunition to back it up in a peer to peer conflict that army is as good as dead in a long term peer to peer conflict. Right now you are spending $1 Trillion a year in your military and yet you are getting completely out manufactured by the Russians in ammunition and equipment even though they are only spending 1/10 of your military budget. Conclusion, Your military, and all your fancy high tech equipment, is meant to make money for defense contractors, nor fight and win wars. Furthermore, all your branches except the Marines corps are struggling to recruit personnel. A country's true military strength is not the strength of its armed forces, but it's industrial capacity base to mass produce equipment and ammunition in a very short amount of time and it's ability to mobilize huge amounts of men for military forces. Your equipment is over priced, your industrial manufacturing base is unable to mass produce large amounts of ammunition and equipment and you struggle to recruiting personnel. That is not sign of strength. That is a huge sign of weakness. In a peer to peer conflict you will lose huge amounts of equipment and men. You can have the shiniest most sophisticated equipment in the world you can't replace both your equipment and recruit in large quantities you are in deep 💩. Just some food for thought there.

[@bertster28]

Clearly the Army isn’t ready for near peer conflict. Let’s hope this changes before we take unnecessary casualties for no reason because of old thinking, poor strategies & fighting yesterdays wars

[@bertster28]

Bro, I can’t take this seriously. Watching this video be like another futuristic take from the army that never comes to fruition. “On Demand Resupply” 🤣🤣🤣. What is this? Squad? Amazon Prime? The Army & pentagon loves selling these programs that aren’t battlefield tested that will fail because someone gets a major kickback

[@Sweetpuffmuffin]

On Demand Resupply is not a fantasy concept? There are multiple different technologies that could manage that in the future.

[@johndilivio2770]

Can army fight a conventional war if all satellites are jam

[@johndilivio2770]

Need lots of artillery like the russians

[@MarcosElMalo2]

The U.S. doesn’t want to fight long protracted wars like Russia is doing, stuck in Ukraine. Air power gets the job done quicker. Thanks for playing, Ivan.

[@johndilivio2770]

Infantry need 26 weeks good training get fat guy join 300 lb

[@borisnikator7060]

It is clearly Russia you mention when talking about great power adversary 😅 What happened with LGBTQ+ US army, why there were no transgender super soldiers in this video? 😂

[@henrygonzalez360]

More like China.

[@johndilivio2770]

During vietnam war army poor traing

[@jerrymiller9039]

More importantly fight the wokeness

[@rezzob]

what if the theatre commander is neither he or she? you excluded big part of the army, bigot!

[@catzor4795]

Haha, low IQ vatnik.

[@ChristophePochari]

On a non-technical note, one hopes the recent surge in wokeness and affirmative action does not lead to a decay in human capital quality, especially in the face of China's extremely competitive and ability determined selection process.

[@catzor4795]

Slav vatnig bot.

[@origamimambo545]

Your racist and sexist assumptions that only white eighteen year old boys can be effective warriors is just nut job propaganda. I'll still bet on our military over any others. Including the Chinese who have only fought war games unlike Americans.

[@charlesodonnell2993]

There is a decay in human capital quality.

[@sarminder4357]

I would love to see a CT scan of your brain

[@samkg1964]

parting#samuel post @