ARO Symphonic Strings vs Soaring High Strings - tone comparison

[@c-c-laurin-lenschow]

As always I'm happy to read your questions, feedback and sugestions in the comments! If you like this kind of content, please consider giving the video a like and subscribing to my channel. Also check out my main channel if you want to hear my original compositions: www.youtube.com/@c-m-laurin-lenschow ...and consider following me on Instagram for more music content: instagram.com/laurinlenschow.music/

[@raulhidalgo4397]

Great video, thanks for this, it makes me confirm ehat my next purchase will be.

[@talnomix3164]

i dont know what it is but both sound a bit synthetic... dont know why! And the backround there is a frequency one octave down from the note being played which i dont hear in normal recordings from there...

[@TemmeSikkema]

Those Soaring Strings do sound absolutely gorgeous here, I have to say

[@c-c-laurin-lenschow]

Yes - it's a great little library!

[@batelgroun]

Soundwise they both sound similar, but the issue with the legato bumps in V2 makes it stand out. It's incredible what Spitfire achieved with a 49€ lib in Soaring High Strings. The only place where I can see that V1 & V2 AROSS (playing together) can outshine Soaring is in the medium speed legato phrases at softer dynamics.

[@ASX2001]

The runs sound much better with high soaring strings.

[@MrGreekBlade]

Soaring High strings for 49$ wins ;)

[@ASX2001]

Sounds as if Soaring Strings have more "heart and desire", while they keep the ARO SymStrings more neutral, which is ok. But even the runs are better with Soaring Strings!