Thanks a lot, prof. Justin! Your video is certainly the best on the Arrow-Pratt risk aversion coefficient on KZbin!
@elvitd6704 Жыл бұрын
for sure, couldn't find any better
@sukhrajb93823 жыл бұрын
This was brilliant, made it very easy to understand
@kleinebackereikim8792 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! what would you say is this individual's absolute and relative risk aversion? U(Y)= 1-e^2*Y
@houssammekki39963 жыл бұрын
Why is it divided to relative sense or absolue sense if it makes the same conclusion because if we say the invested percentage increase in risky assets it is same if we say we hold more amount in risk assets ?
@alonsoquijano67493 ай бұрын
Do you have the slides? Thanks!
@peipeik90568 ай бұрын
You're my hero, thanks a lot!
@stephenwainaina494 Жыл бұрын
Very nice explanation ,
@joshuagaa70092 жыл бұрын
Sir, at 19:18 , i think that should be written as "as wealth *decreases" instead of increases.
@MrPuberoon4 жыл бұрын
This was helpful. Thanks! Keep making more videos.
@ottoberger67063 жыл бұрын
awesome video!! can you link the paper, from where this informations are from pls?
@DwiMarthaYulia Жыл бұрын
Can you make a practice or tutorial example of Arrow-Pratt Measure of Absolute and Relative Risk Aversion in Stata?
@Marteenez_3 жыл бұрын
Why is the absolute risk aversion defined in that way (as a ratio of the 2nd and 1st derivatives)? Why not just use the 2nd derivative to see how much the utility function is levelling off?
@mateuspucciarelli7799 Жыл бұрын
because the results shouldn't change if you make an affine transformation of the utility function, it is, u(x) and v(x) = a*u(x) + b should be able to represent the same situation. But r(x) = u''(x) is not equal to r(x) = v''(x) = a*u''(x)
@DhritiArora-e1q Жыл бұрын
thank you, it was certainly very helpful.
@ThuHuongHaThi3 жыл бұрын
Thank you a lot, the video did provide a helpful explanation