Artemis 1 Is Ready, Finally We Are Going Back To The Moon!

[@InsaneCuriosity]

Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter, etc... (Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public 😅). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve future contents. A big thank you from all of us.

[@basharthekindandgentle4346]

We can finally reassess what we can and can’t do in the solar system. Only took us 50 years to get back there! 😅

[@veilmontTV]

It was a publicity stunt that was only a success because of a space race with the Russians and to fulfill the promise of a dead president.

[@amateurrandomdude5870]

If we realize that we are not ready yet, should reassess 50 from now 😅

[@Wildstar40]

I predict inside of five years the moon mission will be abandoned due to unforeseen expense just like the shuttle.

[@Raj-gr6dy]

@@Wildstar40 Not this time, private corporations would love to go and cash in on sone sweet, sweet regolith.

[@mheiseus]

@@Wildstar40 noooo…. Corporate money is backing this now, get ready for another step in humanities evolution

[@kerryevans7283]

I signed my friend up to the send you name to the moon. My friend passed away from cancer. She was a remarkable woman who helped disabled children in Pakistan. Thank you Nasa for sending her name to the moon. Safe journey Yvonne.

[@royalspin]

Gotta admit I'm kinda getting excited about this one.I was a toddler when the Apollo landings came to an abrupt end .I remember my mom sitting me down in front of the old black and white TV while they were walking on the moon and telling me to watch because it was important . I never thought it would take us fifty years to get back there but at least it's finally happening . Glad to see that both men and women will be going .I couldn't care less about their preferred sexuality what country they're from or any of that , it's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.The important part is that we as a species are making our first steps off this world and that we'll eventually colonize the solar system and perhaps go beyond the boundary of our system and maybe visit another solar system assuming we manage to not destroy ourselves by our own arrogance, warfare , pollution etc and that we find ways to cooperate with each other in the quest for knowledge,our shared survival and to find all the vast wealth that's out there. Crossing my fingers and hoping for the best for these missions .

[@srh667]

missions for what? your story is mine, my mom pointed at the black and white and said this is important. Of what importance is it now? No one seems to know the reason for it other than an unnecessary publicity stunt. we had something to prove, and we were desperate to beat the russians, now, its a waste.

[@TheMrDrMs]

I'm so excited for this mission, espically when astronauts can step foot on the moon again. I can't imagine how exciting it was in the 60's.

[@abvmoose87]

Why are you excited about doing something we did 50 years ago?? What is actually WRONG with you??

[@jetpond7904]

@@abvmoose87 you’re never excited for anything, you can’t be talking

[@leftmono1016]

@@abvmoose87 - I’m excited as I was only a few months old the last time astronauts walked on the moon. So don’t remember watching the coverage 😉

[@121208lucky]

@@abvmoose87 what is wrong with YOU?!?! are you that broken that you gotta try and spread your negativity to others I feel sorry for you and if u can't get any excitement for a subject like this don't don't try to drag others down with you. If you have to be rude then just keep it to yourself js

[@bobcastro9386]

As a "space kid" growing up in the 1960's, I was excited to the greatest degree at what we were attempting to accomplish in outer space and on the moon. The positive aspects of human exploration and the cooperation that made it possible was just the right antidote to the dreadful violence, cultural turbulence and political division that cast their malignant shadows across the 1960's. For us, the space program saved our futures from sliding into the abyss of despair. I hope that young people today will be as excited as we were back then. For me, the most impressive moment (after the drama of a Saturn V launch) was when the Capsule Communicator radioed up "Apollo, you are GO for TLI (the Trans Lunar Injection rocket engine burn to leave Earth orbit). You are GO for the moon." Even though Monday's launch of SLS/Artemis 1 is unmanned, I think that the CapCom in Houston should still key the microphone and say "Artemis One, you are GO for TLI. You are GO for the moon."

[@adub1300]

Orion has already flown once in 2014 on a heat shield test flight. A Delta IV heavy rocket lifted it into an elliptical orbit that allowed it to reenter at roughly 80% of the velocity it will have coming back from the Moon.

[@Roberttttttttt]

You mean going to the moon FOR THE FIRST TIME!

[@mm-dw4rr]

Okay, hang on to your hats, it's all about to happen! I'm ready! Are you? 🤩

[@ingridhohmann3523]

Sooooooo ready !!!!!

[@mm-dw4rr]

@@ingridhohmann3523 I can't wait for what we may see in the next 10 to 15 years!

[@Teventrel]

@@ingridhohmann3523 0

[@shanelebeau5891]

Yeah I’m super excited for all of this

[@trickeruniverse1979]

Yesssss

[@marsEv310]

How did they get Stanley Kubrick to do the sequel? 🎥

[@utkuerkan7028]

Awesome video, please upload similar content frequently into the future. All the best to NASA/ESA with their Artemis lunar missions & I hope it would be successful missions in near future.

[@ThePrufessa]

As if they needed you to to tell them they should upload similar content..... SMH this world is full of narcissistic dummies.

[@Reconseal4050]

Its crazy how much engineering is required in order to get to the moon. But glad we are finally going back to the moon!!!

[@marklandrebe3521]

Don't hold your breath.

[@nasa_fanboy4434]

Yeah, they will go around it unmanned! And then nothing else will happen!

[@Reconseal4050]

@@nasa_fanboy4434 So they won't even try landing a rover on it? Would be a waste of a huge rocket.

[@ciberthej]

@@marklandrebe3521 Bad choice of words talking about space travel

[@ciberthej]

@@Reconseal4050 They will, one of the 10 payloads is a Japanese autonomous lander I think. But the main objective of the mission is to test the engines and systems that will take the ship to the moon and back.

[@geemanbmw]

I was just a little kid when apollo 17 launched at night and i got see it launch again sending up Skylab a sight no human will ever forget witnessing. Onward and upward adastra!

[@SIKE01]

Humanity has never been to the moon and never will in any of our lifetime. It's impossible. R.I.P STANLEY KUBRICK

[@jaymz1999]

More-on

[@robertmurphy5105]

Amen. Earth is flat brother, the end times are upon us.

[@Spindrift-id1ez]

So who remembers exactly where they were when Armstrong first took step? I do, And now finally after all these years and all the talk from NASA as they developed this new launch system based on Shuttle engine technology and a new crew capsule that was not just Apollo on steroids.. Welp here it is folks, We're ready ta go.. It's not a Moon base Alpha Lunar Eagle like in Space 1999, but at least it should put us back on the Moon. And at my age seeing man back on the Moon would be a cool thing to see before I die

[@insanecuriosity2682]

thank you for your comment 😊

[@gecko-sb1kp]

Apparently at 18 months old I was sitting in a pram while my mother and grandparents were watching it on a department store's television sets along with everyone else. It was the morning of July 21 where I was in Australia that's why it was daytime. Of course I don't remember it. My earliest recollections of life was around the time of Apollo 14 in early 1971 but my first recollections of seeing astronauts on the big black and white television and first knowing about 'spacemen' would have been during Skylab. Funnily enough, it ended up crashing not far from where we live when I was 11. And that I do remember well...

[@svglorious]

I was on the aircraft carrier USS Oriskany operating 50 miles offshore of North Vietnam. It was two in the morning and our captain broadcast the landing over our ships loudspeakers. Very exciting and emotional.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@sciencedavedunning3415]

Sitting on the floor of our living room in Pennsylvania, in front of my dad, eyes glued to the screen of our 13in, black and white, Motorola. I was 12 yrs old, mind already filled with science and science fiction possibilities. Totally enthralled by Walter Cronkite's explanations and reportage. Thinking the future would be far brighter than watching America decend into unemployment, poverty, and neo-fascism .

[@dedebones1967]

I was 3

[@ashtray8677]

Let's get the moonbase built already! Us humans don't live forever ya know!

[@jetpond7904]

Poo

[@redtoaster7078]

Poo

[@CheesieGamer]

LOL... I thought nasa had already placed marionette astronauts and played golf on the moon 🤡⛳😂

[@jukio02]

I would love to see this base on the Moon be turned into a colony and then into a city. I would love to visit it one day.

[@LisaAnn777]

Me too! I really look forward to seeing flat earthers and moon landing denialists, along with all the other religious who believe in a "firmament" and the moon and sun are the same size. Ahh it will be beautiful to see the surprised look in their faces, I can see it now.

[@John_Redcorn_]

Although it would be cool, a moon base offers no real benefit. Or any base on any planet where we’d have to live under a dome to survive. Thats a sad existance.

[@LisaAnn777]

@@John_Redcorn_ rather be sad than extinct.

[@nickbarnett1942]

@@John_Redcorn_ you bin on a plane?

[@John_Redcorn_]

@@nickbarnett1942 what?

[@TheScullum77]

Can't wait to see us go back to the moon and learn more about our capabilities in deep space for future adventures.

[@shawndouglass2939]

Ditto my friend. 😉

[@budwhite9591]

As a contingency for Apollo, probably even this - if for some reason they shoot past the moon, they wouldn’t be “lost in space having missed the moon entirely and just keep going “. Eventually they would run out of momentum due to the earth and moons gravity and fall back to earth. Hopefully they can control that fall back to earth ( Apollo 13 ) and make it back. 13 was a free return because they were able to burn the LM engine. Had they not had that engine they would have shot past the moon and come back once their momentum ran out and a very eccentric orbit, probably really fast too at about 6 days out versus the usual 3-4 it takes to get to the moon. Had Apollo 13 not lost their fuel cells it would have taken longer but that would have been the safest route home. So being lost in space if you miss the moon is a myth. Now come up short on the moon and you may crash into it. But that’s a completely different problem

[@cosmic2096]

Sep - 3 ... can't wait for it . A blissful day for space lovers and universe. A mission worth investing on ♾️

[@rickstandal626]

I worked in the Gemini and Apollo program and am sitting here in disbelief, just about everything their doing is based on equipment that was state of art 50 plus years ago. Demonstrates that government is incapable of forward, revolutionary thinking. If it works why change it. If Ford was a government program we'd still be driving the Model T. That is why we need men like the Henry Ford's and Elon Musk's, without them and their vision, we'd still be looking for someone to come up with the wheel.

[@ingridhohmann3523]

Well stated

[@dirremoire]

I agree with everything you say except about Elon Musk. Starship ain't gonna fly.

[@rickstandal626]

@@dirremoire The Starship has already flown just not to orbit but went well enough to validate proof of concept. That being said I was using Musk as an example of those people who think out of the box. People who see a problem as an opportunity to stretch technology, find new and better ways. Maybe its better batteries, or a better engine, never satisfied always looking for a new way to solve a old problem. The better mouse trap so to speak or a better and cheaper way to put STUFF in LEO. Those people are rare and Musk is one.

[@GenuineUFOs6833]

Rick Standal I agree with you. I find it hard to believe that our technology has not got past having to slingshot around our moon, or they're still having to rely on a parachute on the re-entered module in 2022. You may also find this of some interest. There was a huge craft in the area of the Hercules constellation on 27.05.19 at 1.20am. And between 12.11.18 to 15.11.18. there was a lot of activity around the moon, including flashing lights and coloured objects. These objects were not in orbit around the moon, but stayed to the right of the moon over a four hour period. If we don't have this technology then who does.

[@rickstandal626]

@@GenuineUFOs6833 I'm getting older by the day and still remember the radio guy who coined the term flying saucers. That being said after all this time I've seen no definitive evidence that we have been visited by extra terrestrials. I' have seen the top of a hover vacuum sold as a FS, flares from a flight of NG fighters sold as FS as well. Is it possible they exist? Maybe but as of now the burden of proof has yet to be met. I was working in a place called Oatman Mt in AZ for the US Army and NASA when we started tracking a UFO, jets were scrambled from Luke AFB. What we found was a an inversion layer was bouncing our pulse and locked on to a Greyhound bus heading for Yuma.

[@sarinsarin7898]

Looking forward to the future of space travel, FINALLY

[@glennstoker4586]

to go back,first you must go...

[@johnconnell8436]

I'm so excited for this. The first big news story I remember as a child was the first lunar landing!

[@insanecuriosity2682]

Thank for watching

[@abvmoose87]

Fake comment detected

[@jetpond7904]

Hi. Poo

[@LisaAnn777]

@@abvmoose87 how is that fake? Many remember the original Apollo landings. My parents were fortunate enough to watch them when they were very young and my dad has loves spaceflight to this day. I hope he's still around to see this by the time they land again it will be incredible

[@jgagatch]

Nothing will ever be as good as Apollo

[@MrDara1952]

Things will be even better!

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

Space missions is something that uplifts every humans spirit.

[@mannyortiz3656]

Shouldn't we already know what to expect as far as radiation levels, etc?

[@travisn346]

You're on to something. Don't ask pesky questions!

[@GrandPrixDecals]

Time for that billion dollar second round of golf 🙄

[@markd9580]

It took 50 years “to go back” because nobody ever went there. If it was that routine it would have been happening all of these years. A very complex engineering feat if it happens nonetheless

[@bandilemasuku3533]

It took 50th years because of waining government support after apollo 11 people weren't interested in moon missions. We did go to the moon

[@markd9580]

@@bandilemasuku3533 I’m not a conspiracy theorist usually but I have my doubts it ever happened. Either way it’s got my exited!

[@bandilemasuku3533]

What doubts though do you know hard it would be to fake a moon landing.over 400 000 people worked on apollo program from around the world do you really expect all 400 000 to lie for nasa if it were fake? Thats just stupid also this was during the cold war if the moon landings were fake the soviets who had spies all over America would report it but they didn't because we did go to the moon

[@markd9580]

@@bandilemasuku3533 my biggest question is how they got off the moon and like I said, why it never got revisited by the Americans or anyone else for that matter

[@TheSobieskiukas]

@@markd9580 well the simple answer money it cost a lot to do that achievement and why 50 year's? After the fall of Soviet Union the space race ended NASA budget was being cut every year

[@danielirving7209]

“Return” lolol

[@dirremoire]

I'll believe it when I see it

[@adamoshea2793]

9 days

[@sosig6702]

Go to nasa then and watch the launch in the 29th

[@dirremoire]

@@sosig6702 What launch? 🤣

[@sosig6702]

@@dirremoire The rocket

[@jimseibyl5140]

I’m excited to see a moon rocket fly again, I was a little kid during Apollo, and I was sure we would have a moon base by now. Glad to see us go back, hopefully for good this time.

[@MikeNapoli1989]

With spaceX, and blue origin, I’m sure we will be there for good 🥰

[@christopherpittman8054]

Haha. Blue Origin? Don't make me laugh so hard. SpaceX will be the one to do so. Blue Origin can't even get into an orbit on their own.

[@MikeNapoli1989]

@@christopherpittman8054 not a blue origin fan, but I don’t want to jinks it.

[@insanecuriosity2682]

@Jim Seibyl thank you for sharing your opinion

[@terrygorman5810]

"It will be alright." ~ the power of positive thinking

[@Nehmo]

Many of us were alive for Apolo, but we are dying out (from old age, etc). Pretty soon no one of that time will still be alive.

[@josephwinder6878]

And......your meaning?

[@Nehmo]

@@josephwinder6878 My "meaning" is that older people, who are/were interested in space flight, because they witnessed the early space program, have the ability to compare the beginnings to the current. Soon, there won't be anybody alive that can do that first-hand.

[@heather1985october]

So what?

[@tcoker6616]

We ARE not going back to the moon. An unmanned spacecraft is going back to the moon. When they put people in the spacecraft, then we will go back to the moon.

[@deanhepple3292]

They really think they can land on the moon ? Stop this .

[@dannypipewrench533]

No, they know they can do it. They just need to test it out first. And why could they not do it?

[@ApolloKid1961]

Nah...

[@Jeffreylogan74]

Apollo took roughly 6 days round trip with several orbits around the moon. Artemis is going to take 42 days. Artemis will be flying just over 30000 miles past the moon which is nothing compared to the 250000 miles to get there so why the extra 36 days of mission time? Both Apollo and Artemis will be going about the same speed, about 25000 mph. Even accounting for several large elliptical orbits around the moon the extra 36 days of time cannot be accounted for.

[@AlbertaGeek]

Loosen the tin foil on your head, buddy, there's no grand conspiracy covering up nefarious goings-on, they're just taking advantage of the unmanned mission capsule to perform a butt-ton of experiments and some satellite deployment. The mission profile and all the extra on-board experiments is a matter of public record, so maybe take a gander at that before you break out the whiteboard and different-coloured markers.

[@rickpontificates3406]

WAS READY on Monday... and then SCRUBBED

[@rinasmundakkal]

First time to the moon...... Not the second time

[@johnwest6224]

Not yet.. They postpone... 😅 Again!

[@dirremoire]

The longer it takes us to get back to the moon, the more I think moon-hoax theorists have a point.

[@yegtech]

*We're whalers on the moon, we carry a harpoon. But there aint no whales so we tell tall tales and sing this whaling tune.*

[@sanjayvishwakarma7774]

Thanks to special tracking on moon mission

[@Cargren18]

Weeeeeeee, finally Artemis 1 is about to launch.

[@Cargren18]

That is just for excitement

[@peelp5028]

"About to launch"? I like the sound of that. I don't know what it might be like on the Moon though.

[@doctoruttley]

I hope they land and set up their base near the Appolo 11 site… imagine tourism where one could go see the 1st footprint on the moon in person. 🤯

[@SacTownLions0]

That alone could pay for these missions!

[@sciencedavedunning3415]

The prime lunar real estate is at the poles, That's the only place that has water ice, in the bottom of perpetually shaded craters....... also the only place to provide uninterrupted solar power throughout the month long lunar cycle. If you want permanent settlement, we build there first. Then we build an immense version of the now dead Aricibo Radio Dish Telescope in a very large crater on the lunar far side. Other equatorial craters will get magnetic acceleration catapults from the bottom curving up the side to loft fiberglass bags ( made from lunar silica ) full of lunar regolith up to a ship that will catch and deliver them to L4 or L5 Lagrange point processing, refinement and construction facility. Eventually....... you will get your Apollo site tourist trap, but it takes the industry first, to make it affordable .

[@Sathish_12]

Hope we are really going instead of filming it in the studio😉

[@insanecuriosity2682]

oooooooooo 😵😮

[@jetpond7904]

Another conspiracy theorist found

[@frankyuk]

If you were the first human to set foot on the Moon, what would be the very first thing you would do after stepping off the ladder and delivering your speech? Clearly, you would look at, and then talk excitedly about how you felt being the first man ever to gaze upon your home planet of Earth, from the Moon. You would want to photograph it and film it for posterity. The last thing on your mind would be planting a flag and saluting it. And in which direction would you look to see the Earth? Well, certainly not in front of you, or behind you. The Sea of Tranquility always faces the Earth as the Moon orbits . And so you would have to look directly above you or lay flat on your back to see it... Neither Armstrong nor Aldrin did any of that. They planted a flag, saluted it then hopped around in slow motion collecting 'Moon rocks'. There is only one official photograph of Armstrong on the ‘Moon’ because the 'first man' refused to have any further pictures taken... Armstrong was a Korean war hero, a man of integrity, an honourable and true American patriot who loved his country. His conscience clearly did not rest easy with the lie... They never went to the Moon...

[@sciencedavedunning3415]

Mars mission would be like taking Conestoga wagon to death valley. If we want space effort to pay for itself and be profitable, Ceres, largest main belt asteroid, is the wisest target. 1000 kilometers across, roughly the size of Texas, Ceres offers water ice (as much as all the great lakes), as well as other cometary ices like ammonia and carbon dioxide ( needed for the colony's plant life ) Ceres is also massive enough to have pulled down heavier asteroidal samples , stony nickel/iron bodies, and carbonacious chrondites, ( offering potential solvents like keatones) . All these resources will be very easy to find in the icy body of Ceres using radar. They would be far more difficult to locate and mine in Martian gravity well. On Mars we would also be plauged by 200mph wind storms of fine hematite dust that would frost the glass of optical instruments and solar photovoltaic panels and lightning destroys communications systems. Why climb up out of Earth's gravity well, up where everything is in free fall, and very little delta-v is needed to gather resources and build, only to decend back down into Mars gravity well where far more effort is required to do anything ?

[@edwardpate6128]

We should have gone straight to a manned mission, not playing around with crash test dummies. I'd volunteer in a second!

[@darmy9548]

Think of all the millions who have died or been injured due to wars in the last 50 years when we could of been developing this technology much sooner

[@shawndouglass2939]

We are going back to the Moon, and I say, About time my friends. 😉

[@hightierplayers2454]

Its cool but I find it disturbing "diversity goals" are being touted everywhere as a main point of this mission. Nobody smart cares about "first woman" or "first minorities" on the moon. What strides and progress will be made to permanent settlements or at least re-fueling hubs for further-out missions are the only questions or issues that need solving.

[@wakingforbacon6439]

why not try and look at diversity. we have held back women and minorities for jobs such as these for so long it's about time they actually get a real shot at it. wouldn't you think?

[@geraldhenrickson7472]

Wait, what? Are you sure what you commented here what what you meant to say?

[@jetpond7904]

Exactly. Let’s just focus on the important stuff

[@dannypipewrench533]

@@geraldhenrickson7472 Yeah, we should focus on goals like science and innovation, not things like "Oh Boy I'm the first black guy on the moon!" Now, every kind of person should absolutely have an opportunity to go, but we should not select astronauts based on appearance. We should select based on ability, and that will include plenty of every group. But intentionally creating "diverse" crews regardless of the ability of the members is not a good idea. Imagine you do not get selected despite being the best, because somebody else with lesser ability gets to go for the sole reason of not being a white man. Now, of course, every group has plenty of able members for this objective. I am not saying that other groups shouldn't be allowed because they look different. What I am saying is that appearance should not be a deciding factor. I would much rather have, for instance, the most competent crew consist of all black women than have a mixed crew of mediocre ability.

[@sciencedavedunning3415]

@@dannypipewrench533 The same has always been said about 'affirmative action'

[@kevmasengale6903]

I can't wait for people to go back to the moon!!

[@Dan-qt7kq]

I asked on other sites but got smart ass answers. If there is a vacuum in space, or is it, how can thrusters work, thrust needs to be or hit something, like air or something, but how does that work in space. I’d like to know, this is so fascinating

[@TheTuis]

As the exhaust gasses exit the nozzle and expand behind the spacecraft, it pushes it forward

[@briansomething5987]

Conservation of momentum. If you are accelerating something (eg hot gasses) in one direction, there must be an equal acceleration in the opposite direction so that momentum is conserved. This is Newtons third law 'for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction'. The only 'pushing' the gasses are doing is on the rocket itself, as they accelerate away from it. The gasses do not need to 'push' on anything external to the rocket.

[@joevignolor4u949]

Rocket don't require anything outside to push against because they bring what they need along with them. Both the rocket and the propellants have mass and therefore inertia. As such each wants to remain in its current state of motion per Newton's first law. When the engine starts the propellants are heated and forced out the exhaust nozzle. When this happens both masses push each other in the opposite direction against their relative inertial masses per Newton's third law. Essentially the rocket, which has inertia, pushes the propellant gas in one direction while the propellant gas, which also has inertia, pushes the rocket in the opposite direction. The amount of force created by the engine is proportional to the mass of the propellants being accelerated times the rate of acceleration per Newton's second law. This is why a rockets can work in a vacuum and don't require any outside medium to push against.

[@Dan-qt7kq]

@@TheTuis thanks for a polite answer.

[@Dan-qt7kq]

@@briansomething5987 appreciate the response

[@chrisbowring4298]

I have a lot of enthusiasm and optimism for the SLS. And I wish we would have been back to the Moon by now. BUT!.... This cost one heeeeeell of a lot of money! And each launch of the SLS will also cost a butt load of $$$ with virtual to no reusability save for the command module. Let's be very blunt and realistic on this, the contractors,(Boeing, General Dynamics) and NASA milked the s***! out of it on this! Our emphasis and money should have been put on SpaceX!

[@oforkya]

This shd b fun. I hope 🙏 all will b perfect. Decades over due.

[@thef22raptor15]

This time it will be fun coz we have HD cameras

[@ytvteletoonanimatekidvskatfan2]

guys I just checked the team of this project and found out that people working in ethereum founded this company. what do you think

[@quadrogong1111]

When we screw up this world enough, we can always move some folks to the moon.. they wanna start grabbing pieces of it asap

[@czjmaster]

To The Moon, Now is The Time! MMHe3🌒

[@fritiofclarin3611]

This is so cool!!! excited

[@batcollins3714]

I thought we were told not to go back there.

[@israeldiegoriveragenius2th164]

Do they have the film studio ready?

[@jaymz1999]

More-on

[@bencraker]

Artemis 1 is Ready! … launch scrubbed.

[@orangemanbad]

Still don’t understand. We need to test radiation levels if it’s safe but we already sent astronauts there? Still not sure if our technology can get us there and back but we could 50 years ago? Not a conspiracy theorist. Just seems very odd. Can anyone answer?

[@CatalinElton]

At 9:43 the presentation said the engines will be turned on again to slow the spacecraft down. This is false. As the spacecraft first goes behind the Moon, it will perform a Powered Fly By, it will point the nose forward and speed up to set the highest point of the Distant Retrograde Lunar Orbit.

[@dathyr1]

Maybe!!!!!! They are having a hard time even trying to launch the rocket. Time shall Tell

[@stevewhite6861]

This is really going to make flatturds cry, when they can't possibly deny this happened they will make up all sorts of garbage to 'prove' it never happened or they will as usual stick their fingers in their ears and scream La La La La, ad nauseam.

[@ivanscottw]

I'm a little confused.. The entire thing describes that the lunar gateway is *already* there ! It's not, it's not even built.. it's not even funded !

[@MrDara1952]

Superb! Let’s go fly! But note that Greenwich Mean Time is an outdated term having been replaced by UTC.

[@titoizdaman3]

Don't speak too soon and don't hold your breath

[@sanjayvishwakarma7774]

Thanks 👍

[@bugssy]

On their way back, can they bring me a bag of doritos and orange soda?

[@davidking8361]

Would be so nice if he stated the specific year with all those dates! Jeeeez! Look sharp, man!

[@kallikantzaros4444]

Better late than never! "🌎🌍🌏🚀💥🌛🌟Now for a moon base! 💫

[@mikelastname9444]

I'm going to sneak into the capsule and fly to the moon. (Not really, I'm just kidding. Don't send feds.)

[@sosig6702]

too late

[@jetpond7904]

Say goodbye

[@davidmacphee3549]

Dr. Smith

[@mark.083]

Soooo. Its the 4th of September annnnnd 2 failed launch attempts later tells us that artimis Isn't ready to go back to the moon because of a leeky pipe.... Twice! Just saying. 😕🙄

[@dutchindoe]

The moon is not a planet you can land on, it's just a light in the night sky

[@heather1985october]

Do you also believe that the Sun is just a plug in space heater?

[@macedonian75]

when did someone go to the moon to go again? For the first time it is certain that it will happen, but the second time will be after the first landing, but since when someone will land on the moon for the first time.

[@snobgoblin1226]

They were overly lagging on this didn't even know it was 8 years in the making.

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

GO NASA.

[@marcusw3891]

I know absolutely zero about earth re-entry and the reason for all the heat issues so I will ask a potentially really stupid question. If the earths atmosphere is the cause of friction why not reduce speed to synchronize with the rotation of the earth before re-entry and minimize friction and thus the resolve the problem??? Is this strategy possible?

[@joevignolor4u949]

It's possible but there is a reason why they don't do it that way. Slowing down in space prior to reentry would require a long engine burn to do it, which means carrying along a lot of additional propellants throughout the entire mission. As the command module comes back it has lots of momentum stored up that has to be dissipated somehow. The most efficient way to slow down is to convert all that momentum into heat. That's what atmospheric braking accomplishes during reentry. The heat shield does add some extra weight to the spacecraft, but its a lot less than all the extra propellants to slow down would weigh. Your question is not stupid at all. Many other people wonder the same thing.

[@marcuslandry]

Kilogram is not a measure of thrust.

[@emoneydev8684]

yay

[@boqndimitrov8693]

sounds good... but don't forget apollo13!

[@ApolloKid1961]

What about Apollo 1?

[@Sonsaiyon]

I was stoked the other day I heard this on the news, then midway through they start talking about a no man crew and that they are testing it first. 😮‍💨 So the question is, if its a success, when is it actually going to go back with a crew🤔

[@LD-vh4cn]

Let's hope they don't loss the technology again before then

[@fernandochaves9665]

I hope they make the CO2 filters in Artemis 3 all the same, round or square; just in case.

[@doctordoom1502]

Called that one wrong didn't ya...

[@grumpygramps1451]

I just think that for the sake of taking giant leaps for the benefit of mankind there are far more pressing issues on our own planet that would benefit greatly from the vast amount of $$$ being spent on an exercise that has already been conducted half a century ago. How much more scientific value is there to be gained from doing something that has already been done before ?

[@mitchgivant6623]

Going around the moon is NOT going too the moon just orbiting it

[@RR-or5ip]

Should have crew on board for this first launch

[@leftmono1016]

Not a good idea on a test flight.

[@codetech5598]

@@leftmono1016 Apollo had no problem sending men on untested equipment, and worked perfectly. LOL.

[@mrquirky3626]

@@codetech5598 The first Apollo missions (4, 5 and 6) were unmanned test flights to confirm the space crafts worked. This first Atremis flight is attempting to go further past the moon than any of the Apollo flights did so there is a lot of things that can go wrong.

[@fabiogentile53]

@@codetech5598 not really perfectly. Some critical steps of the Apollo landings were dangerous and the astronauts risked not getting back to earth

[@leftmono1016]

@@codetech5598 - but that’s not correct is it 🤦‍♂️

[@claudiocorleone7856]

You said it we are going back! backwards! Why?

[@amptunes]

I have very little faith in nasa doing anything but wasting money.

[@sosig6702]

believe in spacex

[@vp3579]

Made in hollywood😅🤣

[@sosig6702]

proof

[@ahmetmutlu348]

8 yers for what ? Calculating route trajectory for going and com9ng back ;) Or is it waiting for collectig 2$ a day to reach goal amount ? Or for c9nstructing rocket ? Why 8 years ?

[@amangogna68]

Great video !

[@insanecuriosity2682]

Thanks !

[@mykebillig3698]

Ready for the moon? For shame; you pick your drawers back up this moment, young man!

[@foxmccloud7055]

Anyone having the Artemis meal, which consists of orange juice, steak, eggs, toast and coffee?

[@dannypipewrench533]

I think that is the astronaut meal in general.

[@ericdixon7405]

Would not all of these parameters placed upon the human body have been researched being that we have been to the moon and through these environments several times already???🤔🤷🏾‍♂️

[@Atticus711]

Greneshween time? It's Greenwich...

[@ASY.3]

I loveeeeee your channel