A rough approximation of the upcoming moon landing in 2025 (hopefully). Not to scale.
Пікірлер: 88
@liormalka35502 жыл бұрын
Great job with the mission and rocket re-creations! Only 2 minor inaccuracies- The Superheavy uses RCS to get away from the lander and the starship's vacuum engines have no gimbal, but great job overall!
@colegustafson1992 жыл бұрын
Also forgot to mention the lunar station, in a much more complex orbit but yeah
@fork90012 жыл бұрын
@@colegustafson199 Artemis 3 won’t use Gateway at all. Direct docking between lander and Orion.
@alrightydave2 жыл бұрын
@@fork9001 yes it will use gateway It’s launching in 2024 and ready in 2025 with a year of commissioning
@fork90012 жыл бұрын
@@alrightydave *intended not to use gateway. To land in 2024, nasa wanted to skip the gateway for Artemis 3, but after the delay gateway can be used. However, if gateway is delayed I expect them to skip gateway. At the time that I posted my comment, the plan was still not to use gateway.
@darthvader6588 Жыл бұрын
@@alrightydave No, it docks directly with starship. Gateway is planned to be used in like 2026 or 2028 iirc.
@joacogonzalez14302 жыл бұрын
This is the best Lunar Starship replica I've ever seen, new sub
@alrightydave2 жыл бұрын
Check out Yukon. I think you’ll be shocked with the standards of stock replicas now
@demarcuscousinsthe65th2 жыл бұрын
@@alrightydave eh, its decent.
@Ultraramage2 жыл бұрын
This was too good, i HAD to sub. Looking forward to more
@ashh3051 Жыл бұрын
This is better than the 3d renderings of the mission found elsewhere! Nice job.
@spaceguy90252 жыл бұрын
Love the look of the craft, great work! :D
@dbneptune2 жыл бұрын
👏 Another great video!
@zoltantakacs64142 жыл бұрын
Bro this is insane!
@AltairBlue6 ай бұрын
my honest to god, down to earth reaction to the artemis 2/3 delays
@dietcoke7594 ай бұрын
ngl i'm expecting 3 won't happen till 2030
@famlrnamemssng8 ай бұрын
I was watching this video at 12:00 am on my birthday. You get a like
@FortFlick2 жыл бұрын
Nice!
@l3mmy2242 жыл бұрын
Looks really cool, although I don't agree with that flight plan (seems too overpowered to me) it looks really cool in KSP!
@gyrotechnics97662 жыл бұрын
Wym by overpowered?
@maxvyros4322 жыл бұрын
@@gyrotechnics9766 too much delta-v, I suppose
@paolomontagna52862 жыл бұрын
Grest Mission👍👍
@scpguy13813 ай бұрын
Artemis will have 4 astronauts , not 3, but I understand how that wouldn’t be possible
@phoenics246510 ай бұрын
Bros got the stock plume.. really nice vid! But you could use the waterfall mod for better engine plumes
@Crowbars27 ай бұрын
I just hope they have cameras galore on the spaceships during the actual launch. So we can see what launching to space looks like from just outside Starship, the Moon's night sky, the view from outside the lander when landing on the moon etc. It'd be so amazing to see that, and to see moon landing conspiracy theorists have egg on their face.
@orionSpacecraft6 ай бұрын
Lol they will just say it’s cgi They have religious devotion to their conspiracies
@fitnesstop112Ай бұрын
your wish is true. They had cameras on the 3rd flight
@brandonfigueroa73995 ай бұрын
good video
@post_toska2 жыл бұрын
nice
@_RandomPea2 жыл бұрын
Build walkthrough ? ;)
@AverageFreedomEnjoyer Жыл бұрын
hey the exploration upper stage has 4 engines. Edit: also the orbit isnt correct
@ashh3051 Жыл бұрын
What happens to the Starship after this? Does it just stay in the lunar orbit forever? Does it have enough fuel onboard to make a return to Earth uncrewed?
@ashh3051 Жыл бұрын
Partially answered my own question with some further reading. The HLS doesn't have heat shield or aero surfaces, so it's not capable or re-entering Earth's atmosphere.
@thesharky Жыл бұрын
Lunar gateway
@fitnesstop112Ай бұрын
It don't have enough fuel to make it back so 2 possibilities: 1: It will deorbit and crash into the moon (Most likely) 2: SpaceX will refuel it to keep using it for future missions
@JeyJeyKing118 күн бұрын
@@fitnesstop112without the ability to inspect it, I doubt they will reuse it. I wouldn’t be surprised if NASA will just pay for a new one for each mission.
@fritzypooo4 күн бұрын
HLS starship looks so silly next to an orion lol
@wernhervonkerman2382 Жыл бұрын
Are u gone?
@randallolson7630 Жыл бұрын
No lunar gateway?
@kartitart76028 ай бұрын
Is it a recreation if it hasn’t happened and this is just the planned concept?
@MrMz90 Жыл бұрын
how to get the red target aiming laser ?
@benjaminmontenegro34234 ай бұрын
It’s part of the mod Kerbal Engineer I think
@MrMz904 ай бұрын
@@benjaminmontenegro3423 i have the mod but I can't find it
@benjaminmontenegro34234 ай бұрын
@@MrMz90 there’s a little pop up window when you’re flying a craft that says stuff like “flying” “orbit” “surf” etc. you gotta click on the one that says something like “landing”, and that red target will come out
@MrMz904 ай бұрын
@@benjaminmontenegro3423 thanks ❤
@benjaminmontenegro34234 ай бұрын
@@MrMz90 hey did it work in the end?
@T112352 жыл бұрын
You should install restock
@DaroGonzalez2 жыл бұрын
And Waterfall
@reddeadrazor82572 жыл бұрын
And Tundra Exploration
@alrightydave2 жыл бұрын
No. Tundra sucks. Replicas are cooler Restock sucks because it makes replicas look shit. Just makes non replica stock stuff less ugly
@daigo19522 жыл бұрын
Are you kidding?!
@startek1194 ай бұрын
Honestly why have any part of this program that isn’t starship. Like literally everything can be done on starship.
@JeyJeyKing118 күн бұрын
Because it’s a job program, not a space program.
@fritzypooo4 күн бұрын
I doubt starship will mature to the point where HLS starship will even be possible, especially if the plan requires orbital refueling through 14 individual launches.
@startek1194 күн бұрын
@@fritzypooo Okay but even if every other part of the program except starship succeeds no one lands on the moon. If only starship succeeds we land on the moon. So why even bother with the other stuff?
@cdw24682 ай бұрын
this really demonstrates how awful the artemis mission plan is. 14 flights to refuel? an elevator to get the astronauts down to the surface? this all looks like points of failure galore
@brocher9539Ай бұрын
space enjoyers when a space agency do something ambitious :
@cdw2468Ай бұрын
@@brocher9539 it’s not ambitious, it’s idiotic. if we wanted to be ambitious, we’d actually build a capable lifter and lander rather than cobbling together some BS plan to appease some politicians. apollo did not take 14 flights for 1 landing
@alexb.601313 күн бұрын
If all NASA wanted to do was send two astronauts, stay for a few hours, and return home, then yes, Apollo was the far better program. Given the objectives of the Artemis program (especially the construction of a lunar base), the current design seems like a reasonable solution.
@cdw246813 күн бұрын
@@alexb.6013 i don’t see how having a subpar system for a lesser goal will make more ambitious goals more achievable. how is this system more adaptable than apollo was?
@alexb.601313 күн бұрын
@@cdw2468 Can you specify? Why do you think the currently planned system is worse than Saturn 5? As stated before, I agree that Starship as a Lunar Lander is massively overpowered and overcomplicated if all you want to do is land two astronauts, but as far as I understand Artemis aims to achieve much more than that. Let's simply look at payload to the lunar surface (LS): Apollo: There was a proposed (but never realised) unmanned cargo version of the LEM with a payload capacity of 5t to LS. Artemis: Even if the HLS realises only half (!) of what is proposed, it will land 50t payload on LS AND have astronauts on board. I can only guess at how much equipment is necessary to construct a permanent lunar base, but based on the only other permanent station in vacuum, the ISS, with a mass of 450t, I guess it will be at least a couple hundred tons. Therefore, it would take 100 Saturn 5 launches to deliver 500t to LS, while it would take only 10 HLS landings. Since HLS needs to be refueled, which we can assume will take 10 launches each, it also takes 100 launches in total. The difference is of course, that while we would need a completely new Saturn 5 for each launch... The implications for cost and feasibility are clear, unless you don't trust SpaceX to deliver (which is reasonable of course, but empirically unwise)
@retodera95938 ай бұрын
0:52 you accidentally typed "to" 2 times
@andreas.9175 Жыл бұрын
Why don't the astronauts just go up in Starship?
@Wurtoz96438 ай бұрын
Can’t return and SLS job program
@TheJimtanker2 жыл бұрын
This is probably the only time you'll see an SLS fly.
@brokensoap17172 жыл бұрын
Artemis 1 is coming very soon
@TheJimtanker2 жыл бұрын
@@brokensoap1717 Suuuuure it is. Let me hold my breath.
@alrightydave2 жыл бұрын
No it isn’t SLS will fly 42 times
@TheJimtanker2 жыл бұрын
@@alrightydave Ok, now I know you’re high.
@orionSpacecraft Жыл бұрын
Lol
@alrightydave2 жыл бұрын
Depot gets 5-6 refuelings 2:22 Lunar starship looks ok But 3:35 yehehehehh that’s not fantastic sorry, try out my SLS Did you do all those refueling flights btw lol Your “SLS” is more like a Jupiter III Direct replica tbh which is good. Better block 1 system 4:44 that’s the ICPS, interim cryo propulsion stage. Not EUS you seem to be quite misinformed with the mission architecture Why is there no gateway? Should be docking to PPE/HALO you really need to learn about Artemis a bit more
@demarcuscousinsthe65th2 жыл бұрын
Chill my bro, atleast he landed on the moon
@fitnesstop112Ай бұрын
no gateway for artemis 3
@Ismael-tv3dxАй бұрын
The 5-6 launches is outdated, the new number is around 15-16 with the worst prediction being 20+. Seems like your the one who needs to be reading more on Artemis.
@alrightydaveАй бұрын
@@Ismael-tv3dx I agree with at least 10 now yes. That was back when we didn’t have accurate enough estimates. I’m well read with Artemis and those were the early days in general