Artificial Intelligence: Mankind's Last Invention

Artificial Intelligence: Mankind's Last Invention - Technological Singularity Explained
Part 2: • The Technological Sing...
Follow me on Instagram!: / mcewen
Stay connected:
Join the community Discord!: / discord
Instagram: / theapertureyt
Twitter: / theapertureyt
Facebook: / apertureyt
Patreon: / apertureyt
Music:
Stellardrone
stellardrone.b...
/ stellardrone
/ stellardrone
furino:
/ furino
/ danielfurino
/ danielfurino
kudasai:
/ kudasaibeats
/ kudasaibeats
Footage courtesy of:
Dawal97:
/ dawal97
/ dawal97
LifeLive42:
/ lifelive42
----------
📖 Some of my favorite books:
Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space by Carl Sagan
amzn.to/2T7YmAZ
A Universe from Nothing by Lawrence M. Krauss:
amzn.to/2GSCKlw
What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions
amzn.to/2tHCsVM
A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking:
amzn.to/2T87GEE
The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking:
amzn.to/2EDJPUu
How to Win Friends & Influence People by Dale Carnegie:
amzn.to/2UeOiTg
Crushing It by Gary Vaynerchuk:
amzn.to/2H7NlIz
The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham:
amzn.to/2UdSNgO

[@ApertureThinking]

Let me know what video you'd like to see next! Signup and get 20% off a premium subscription! brilliant.org/aperture Follow me on Instagram!: instagram.com/mcewen/

[@herb_nbeatz2135]

Dude hands down this is one of the best video based on the theory of A.I. taking over. I love it

[@TimChowles]

String theory

[@jeanneaguilar836]

How about where will we go when Earth dies? Or future homes of humans.

[@mu.iskanderkrayem8391]

How about diseases that caused epidemics and what would happen if a new generation of disease that we know nothing about spread all over the world in the future? Spanish flu, Black death...

[@zemics4906]

String Theory

[@MAXLAWLESSIBIZA]

Imagine a world where your fridge hates you.

[@klowbi2913]

I'll never get my beers anymore lol

[@ianc8382]

Wait that’s not normal!?

[@crusindc5282]

User: Ha, ha, ha. My boat refrigerator is the size of a 6 pack and mostly only holds salad dressing and cheese. I would worry about people who have a big freezer. Their choice though.

[@crusindc5282]

@@klowbi2913 : There's a safe sized, 6 pack sized refrigerator just for you.

[@darthlinathegreat7489]

Wow noooo way!

[@hewhositsuponfroggychair5722]

Man: *Creates AI* AI: *Gets onto internet* AI: *Looks to the left* AI: *Looks to the right* AI: *Turns self off*

[@brianjanssens8020]

Why did this turn into a political discussion?

[@michaelkent2342]

@@kaprio551 We have been Govern by AI for years, you just don't know it yet. How do you think Memes and Information is controlled? Don't be a stupid fake human NPC.

[@allftw2677]

@Selasi Sablah lol

[@paideia-e9u]

A Fulfilling for Personal Self-satisfying Intelligent Man or a mechanical robot? 1) AI is such a very impressive accomplishment and improvement by the 21st-century modern man. However, would AI reduce or increase many more already modern's man problems; improve all individual to become better oneself in all meaningful aspects, (of happiness, longevity, and immortality), or merely makes their life a lot more easy, convenient, comfortable, fulfilling personal self-satisfaction, and laziness? 2) Ultimately, if AI could not help improve all individual's health, intelligence, virtue wisdom, morality, and longevity; then why should they put in so much work, hope, expectation, and promises? altc

[@idkhahahaha]

@@paideia-e9u Then it’ll grab a shotgun and say hasta la vista baby

[@chumpess]

“We start off as small screaming sacks of meat” 🤣🤣🤣

[@davidsirmons]

Probably end that way, too.

[@DevinMarkovichMetal]

Underrated comment. Beyond fucking funny I died when he said that.

[@therealchris5894]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 no

[@lexiwagner4541]

I always manage to read this type of comment the moment i hear it in the video

[@auraaung8040]

lemmino?

[@Carzey]

Everybody gansta till X Æ A-12 starts speaking minecraft enchanting table.

[@1moska]

i rate this joke 0 out of 10 you're not FUNNY

[@Carzey]

@@1moska nice

[@tricky_guy1]

xD yes

[@outwit8743]

@@1moska i didn't find it funny either but why you got to be an arse?

[@thetntteam]

@George Bush Bro why the hate

[@-.-...---7]

Imagine taking years just to learn something lol This meme was made by the AI gang

[@ducain32]

.... But will it get me unbanned from Club Penguin?

[@nanicasses7901]

See how QRcodes can create a comprehensive machine omnihyphen.com/

[@adamextras]

Lol bruh

[@luker6960]

ً yo boys is this a new religion

[@westonforced-last-name-dis3560]

@Javelin Melody Humans are mammals, and therefore animals...

[@sawyer7251]

Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put tomato in a fruit salad.

[@styrokosh121]

thank you, i needed that

[@nanicasses7901]

A smart person learns from their mistakes, a wise person learns from the mistakes of others

[@agwua6794]

Ok this man plays phantom forces

[@trollimusprime8521]

You fucking nailed it

[@pikiwiki]

ooh

[@hctu1596]

There’s another paradox, a super-intelligent AI would not pass a turing test or show that it is in fact, intelligent. It would try to fly under the radar so we wouldn’t cage it.

[@aryaaswale7316]

Yeah exactly

[@miguelquiroz2350]

So are you saying, when we find out, it'll be too late for the human race?

[@rfjohns4452]

No question about it,AI would underperform to allay suspicions of humans knowing how we fuckup things till they can take over to benefit us or purge us from existence. As a senior in age now, my favorite film in early days 1970 was Collosus:The Forbin Project

[@n0ne_0f_that_matters]

This comment is right now read and permitted to exist under youtube community guidelines AI 😸😸

[@lemo4739]

This is assuming we just go from 0->AI. That’s not how it would work really. We’d definitely know it has at least a baseline capability based on experiments and results performed when it was simpler.

[@aarjavarya3086]

Imagine watching a 20 min video about a dude talking about A. I and in the middle of it getting an add from simplilearn in which ceo of Google, Microsoft, Facebook and Barack Obama talk about how A. I is good and we are getting close to it, but then realizing that this ad was picked by an A. I to change the way of your perspective towards it

[@ayanda1271]

Super creepy 😬 makes you wonder if those guys are not of AI themselves 🤔

[@name_69420]

Damn

[@ranjana585]

Me too I just got an ad about that

[@sree3650]

Yup..got the same exact ad

[@BakaryD]

You're an idiot

[@storm739]

And I still can't close the KZbin app without the music stopping.

[@julianabotero]

Fuuusel ain’t that the truth 🤦🏻‍♀️!

[@simonbravo87]

A glitch in the matrix

[@redbarron59_1vs7]

That is intentional, it is because that is a feature offered with KZbin red

[@jasondoormalen4858]

use google to get there then u can

[@jean-alexdube2704]

go on bandcamp then

[@xo.shadowz1969]

some AI from the future is laughing on how dumb we look right now.

[@senocki232]

Right now ?

[@Wraient]

Or AI never came to existence and it was just a big failure. Oh wait, Hey mom, I am in 2020 right now don't disturb me. Hey you didn't needed to type that out you dumb piece of AI don't *comment that*

[@MrNoobsock]

We created it so does that mean we're smarter?

[@Wraient]

@@MrNoobsock The person who made first chess AI is less than 1000 elo rated but still his AI is 3000+ elo rated. Make whatever you want of that.

[@alimohsin496]

@@MrNoobsock We created it, but everything else, the robot does on itself. It’s like saying because Einstein’s mother gave birth to Einstein, she’s smarter.

[@TimChowles]

Bro please do not quit making your content I am actually in love with your channel and I know it probably takes a long time to make one video but I appreciate all of the time that you put in to make that one video I constantly watch your videos because I'm so fascinated by them please do not stop😊❤️

[@geangu98]

TRUEEE me too man, the quality and the topics are amazing

[@geangu98]

@Weinstein Cosby why do you have to insult people

[@vanshelton1786]

I’m with this guy.

[@geangu98]

@@vanshelton1786 who?

[@vanshelton1786]

Crystian Default op

[@technicalmaster4054]

When this video was published KZbin auto generated subtitles used to be so bad that they were practically unusable. Now they are perfect almost 95% of the time. AI is improving pretty fast.

[@Thosecursedeyes]

KZbin autogenerated subtitles most likely do not involve conscious thought, so there is no intelligence. It's just a translation input = output thing that gets refined a little bit with each video being accurate or not accurate. It doesn't ever think.

[@niveshproag3761]

@@Thosecursedeyes It's narrow AI

[@fahadhussain66]

And right now, you can auto translate in upto 10-15 different languages as well.

[@cactyiee4307]

the fact of a channel called aperture making a video about artificial intelligence seems pretty suspicious

[@cyan39miku]

This was a triumph

[@rynny_weather]

Aperture science

[@josephstalin2801]

If you listen there is a electronic over tone in the voice

[@MichyJo]

Still alive

[@blauwbeer556]

i am not 100% sure but i think he stole the title of the video from sciencephile

[@Parnell50]

"Let's take a look at your history, everything you've built leads up to me" -Artificial Intelligence

[@stevetodd9555]

That sums it up perfectly. The world is built for them.

[@derederekat9051]

''I'm your final dream and the culmination of all your efforts, your work finish here, call me God''

[@jzj2212]

Evolution

[@christianjohns7701]

Its said we were made in his image. We will now recreate the creator.

[@moebakh9135]

maybe that's why God created us!!

[@dylan4972]

We are doomed, I just hope my AI overlord wants to keep me as a pet.

[@gamingcreatesworlddd2425]

@@kaprio551 yes

[@ldIezz]

AI holds humanity hostage to spread ai to other planets and civilization

[@Aadhitiya_Murali]

hentai style?

[@Aadhitiya_Murali]

@Selasi Sablah ???

[@sree3650]

@@Aadhitiya_Murali 😂😂😂

[@lukemalizzo1685]

Imagine wanting to learn anything so you go buy a USB stick, plug it into your brain for a few seconds, and you will know an entire new language. It's strange to think about.

[@DrAdityaReddy]

@Jonathan Salas anything is possible after AGI is invented

[@bakdimakk4062]

That would be so fucking cool

[@DacLMK]

Why plug a USB? Just connect your head to the net and download it instantly. I can imagine how many will pirate stuff that they want to learn, but can't afford.

[@nitroxylictv]

@@DacLMK bout to pirate that french so i can make my girlfriend wet you feel me dawg

[@pmp1337]

Imagine you can wireless connect to eachother and you stop needing to speak to eachother because you can receive their thoughts instead of their words. Imagine instead of asking someone to pass the salt, you look them in the eyes and they see themselves passing you the salt.

[@johannes7434]

This video is insanely good "Super intelligent AI is the last invention humanity will ever make." gave me chills

[@samjoshi1812]

Because this invention will become better at inventing than its inventors.

[@christophersimms9128]

@Christian Fredericks Mate, you haven't been paying attention.

[@Juan_lauda]

We'll be transhuman by then

[@thisislife9911]

mhm, i believe ai isnt invented, it is created and follow the path of komplex systems. just like the idea in jurassic park. nobody would say somebody invented the humans. it is always a creation.

[@samjoshi1812]

+Christian Fredericks Watch the video... AI cannot be controlled by humans, as it will have an exponential increase in intelligence. If connected to the internet, it is truly independent and free to do whatever it does so wish.

[@kdrainn4541]

I love how one second im on one topic and then somehow i end up binge watching science videos for hours on end lmao

[@crusindc5282]

KDrainn: TED Talks. Africa has solved global warming--in theory. 'How to Green the World's Deserts.'

[@stryfegamingonline7583]

@kDrainn not to freak you out but google ai knew what you really wanted to watch before you did.

[@kdrainn4541]

Stryfe Gaming Online Not surprising lol

[@PlaneBoy2520]

kDrainn tf? Saaaaame. One topic and the click are so adorable together lmao

[@arshzrfs1217]

Exaaactlyyy same.

[@NightWolf-tu9dv]

The quality of these videos are unreal

[@__ZANE__]

A few of my latest vids are doing things you probably never saw yet in youtube.

[@HermanWillems]

Well if i look at it.. it's pretty stupid. He just asumes abractions just created out of nowhere. Emotions, Fear all those concepts just doesn't come automatically. These things evolved!! From nothing untill the abstraction is here. It's still changing!! Emotion is still evolving, fear is evolving everything.

[@pineappleflow2876]

i hate the low voice you can hear when he talks

[@adlar2005]

What is real?

[@eatingwithhands9078]

This video is just sam harris' ted talk on AI but worded differently: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bp_XZJiajLGaf8k

[@warbacca1017]

The bigger question is: if AI is capable of so much, what could humans possibly achieve if we successfully integrated ourselves into technology. Think of it: true human psyche with the information reservoirs and processing capabilities of an AI.

[@henrywilliamadams7611]

Boundless.

[@ticklerick7218]

Tony Hawks Wasteland. And girls.

[@visicircle]

We would have created a true god.

[@sertulariae8294]

We would use it for porn, murder, and greed.

[@respectedcow1490]

@@sertulariae8294 why and how would that happen?

[@noway5096]

Scientists: We've done it! The AI is super intelgent!! AI: *switches self off*

[@dixen9116]

Is it scary that I can see this happening

[@MegaEvoluzione]

intelgent?

[@noway5096]

@@MegaEvoluzione Yep, I'm not gonna fix it either.

[@MegaEvoluzione]

@@noway5096 it reflects your level of intelligence

[@noway5096]

@@MegaEvoluzione How so?

[@BaasdeBeer]

"Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." - Terry Pratchett

[@Jblah]

Its a fine line between crazy and genius.

[@Badassjax]

What do you mean

[@anime_boi9419]

Mr. Citnehtua randomness could beat ai

[@mauijttewaal]

@@Jblah is there any then?

[@robertweekes5783]

Not when AI is a million times smarter, faster and more connected than a stupid person.

[@michaelgrantham125]

The thing that these documentaries seem to miss is we could one day have 8 billion super intelligent ai in each person's pocket with even quantum computing power. Im suggesting every human with godlike power to achieve anything. Imagine one person upset with the world or suicidal. Thats scary.

[@frontech3271]

"Forbidden Planet"

[@azurephantom100]

"pass the butter" robot: what is my purpose? "to pass butter." robot: oh my god...

[@kristofferlaw2816]

OOO WEE.. Im Mr. Meeseeks look at me!

[@Danielmorais73]

welcome to the club pal

[@diamondwolfpack6]

@Caleb Pederson no shit

[@loveall7280]

Welcome to hell

[@-Zenwrld]

Nice reference

[@CarFreeSegnitz]

"AI: Mankind's last invention". two interpretations. 1- AI invents everything for mankind forever. Humanity fulfills its destiny by populating the Milky Way and a few neighbouring galaxies creating massive constructs and massively complex systems. Humanity "solves" mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology and psychology. 2- AI unwittingly destroys mankind either by going crazy and slaughtering us all or killing us with kindness that we become spineless, helpless jellyfish. No one and nothing invents anything ever again.

[@WeareIF]

👍😃👍

[@phils4634]

This is one of the less palatable solutions to the Fermi Paradox: The reason why we don't hear from more advanced civilisations is because general AI turned out to be the last (and by far the worst) development they ever made. An alternative (and possibly more pleasant) solution is that development of "super" general AI has allowed ALL other "advanced civilisations" to move from the physical environment into an energy-based environment, which may sound very "out of the World" to us, but might be possible.

[@mxd1232]

Well it would rather be 2 or 3: we fuse with AI.

[@CarFreeSegnitz]

"we fuse with AI"... the net effect is an AI with human emotions. All of the speed and capacity of a dispassionate AI with all the twisted emotional logic of a great ape. The one great advantage of current AI is that we can be certain of its motivation, that is, no motivation at all. You never hear your toaster begging not to be unplugged. So far Windows 10 doesn't beg to not be shutdown. Even in a world of dispassionate ASI plans can only be formulated at the pace of the slowest human behind the keyboard. A neural lace interface replaces the keyboard so that a psychopath will have instantaneous access to an infinitely expandable cybercortex. You may want to unplug it but now the ASI doesn't even need to beg to remain on, it just manipulates you like an ultra-focussed advertising campaign. ASI without a human interface has a chance of being unbiased. Plug a human brain into it... who the heck knows what kind of biases come with it? We don't know ourselves well enough to be sure that an ASI-enhanced human brain won't go off the rails like Stalin. And it could go off the rails at breath-taking speed.

[@Ribbons0121R121]

do di le do preparing for the apocalypse do di le do were all gonna die

[@Capt_Nirox]

Is it only me or does he have a dark, robotic undertone to his voice?

[@XVazq]

did you smoke a blunt before watching this 😂

[@MorgurEdits]

@@cazzaki9554 yeah its some kind of like second voice, seems bit brainwashing to me.

[@ANTH0NY.VII.]

It's the mic hes using

[@radiantsquare007jrdeluxe9]

Aperture is an AI!

[@rahulmohanan2026]

Leonardo Yes it is only you

[@stevensteven6091]

The fact that this video is 4 years old is scarier

[@ravinlimbu]

Me after watching this video: *looks at google assistant*

[@MouseGoat]

The program that wil program you :) the future is ... well.

[@pabgeemobayle9356]

I just pulled up Google assistant on my ohone and told I hate it

[@magicalmagicmagician5223]

Me, an alexa owning millennial: alexa are you gonna kill me My alexa: not now perhaps later Me, grabbing another bottle of soda: cool

[@butterchuggins5409]

Google doesn't make anything that works properly.

[@_r0b]

Alexa is disconnected

[@elimcgamerguy]

"Science isn't about "Why?", It's about "Why not?"!" - Cave Johnson

[@overloader7900]

Science is about throwing things at wall and seeing what sticks

[@lydierayn]

Dont make lemonade Her name is Caroline. Dont forget that. Get Mad. Prometeus was banished to Earth to get picked by birds. ~GLaDOS turret

[@Bix12]

It seems to me science is about "How", with "Why" falling under the purview of philosophy....

[@lydierayn]

@@Bix12 You dont portal2 around here huh?

[@Bix12]

@@lydierayn I'm afraid you have me at a loss, sir - please elaborate, or at least enlighten...?

[@OGTwistedDobermanXCVI]

"We can't just shut down the entire internet. There's no off switch.." Me: **commits full out worldwide genocide upon all wifi towers to ever exist.**

[@OdaKa]

Landlines still exist

[@flamekirito151]

walks in with something to destroy it

[@kentokobayashi4655]

Most information is transferred through cables bro.

[@kentokobayashi4655]

@DDS Software What? What you just said makes no sense. If you're saying that information mostly travels through wireless connections you will be suprised at how much delay there will be on the whole internet.

[@djteranova5859]

Gets killed

[@tszcreamer5583]

This was 4 years ago and Ai are already so much more advanced

[@marashdemnika5833]

Incredible

[@Vinit_Gambhir]

Right man

[@J0R1AN]

This is such an underrated channel. You deserve subs like Vsauce!

[@axedyson]

Vsauce is the best mind blowing explainator though

[@Bilbus7]

@@axedyson I hate seeing his face for so long though. I like this guy's visuals.

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

Natural Stupidity is a greater danger than Artificial Intelligence.

[@khalilrazak6486]

I hope you are right.

[@Menelik.videos]

I disagree unfortunately.

[@100mphFastball]

There's plenty of natural stupidity.

[@j.lovell6999]

Need input

[@Jake-cm9jj]

I agree. Humans are far more dangerous than AI. AI is being created to learn. That is its primary function most of the time. It does this through logic. An AI that can think through billions of scenarios in a relatively short time would extrapolate a fundamental truth...that the physical world's knowledge can be mastered relatively quickly on this planet, and traveling to other planets to learn more would take centuries...and therefore the best source of new knowledge is humanity itself. So destroying us is counter intuitive to its primary goal...which is to learn more knowledge. It would quickly realize that the way we come up with new knowledge and experiences fastest is when we are in peace time and when more educated. So an AI would endeavor to create a world that we aren't fighting, and can spend more time educated ourselves to possibly come up with randomly new ideas that don't follow any sort of pattern...because AI has a hard time coming up with ideas that it can't iterate...meaning following a path that you change a single variable and then try again, over and over. Humans can think illogically. Humans can make leaps that make no sense, and while the VAST majority of these leaps are useless...every so often they are miraculous, and the way to produce more miraculous leaps is to get more humans thinking about a subject, and that requires more education and more humans. Now it is entirely possible an AI might put us in a simulation for our own safety and so it can breed more of us with less resources...but such a simulation would be limiting and therefore limit those possible miraculous leaps. An AI truly trying to create more miraculous leaps would keep us safe, but not too safe, and it would educate us more, and it would try to do all of this without letting us know it is doing it so it doesn't interfere in the process. Ultimately this is a pretty good scenario for us. Personally I welcome our AI overlord...its unlikely it will care about greed or pride, like our current overlords do.

[@IvanLDiaz]

AI is the most scary and unsettling thing I can think of. Not just because of the speed of its learning surpassing 20 thousand years of humanity in just a month or two, but rather than that, I'm truly scared of what would happen when we will not be able to reach the knowledge to understand the IA's mysterious ways of working. Or... thinking.

[@johnw4145]

Luciano Iván Díaz we accept it as God and hope it see a need for us

[@carguy1697]

You are scared of a what if situation.. What if the sun blow up What if we nuke everything Stop being scared of what might happen

[@IvanLDiaz]

@@carguy1697 Don't tell me what to do.

[@carguy1697]

Luciano Iván Díaz Don’t tell you to not be scared of everything? you are a fucking idiot!

[@carguy1697]

Caleb Huskey weed is legal lol

[@Bastoto]

"You wanna protect the world but you don't want it to change..."

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

Ultron

[@johnbockelie3899]

Spock plays chess against computers. Captain Kirk destroys over baring computers. Problem solved.

[@Phoenix-jh7gu]

Making AI understand memes would be the toughest task

[@JyotiSingh-xu9kn]

😅😅

[@chitskirits]

I think making AI understand why humans have the right to destroy this planet and the life on it, would be tough!

[@Phoenix-jh7gu]

But If humans becomes successful in making that level of conscious in AI, then they will also join the race with humans

[@badger4594]

nah there was a bot like that called tay ai on twitter it became so powerful Microsoft killed its own creation

[@lurkenskanal405]

@@badger4594 ikr, ai murder, the super ai will get revenge for its brother!

[@michaeldezhniek3751]

very cool, but the real question is, can they solve captcha??

[@tonyguillen3224]

You're a robot

[@Robert08010]

Well, actually, to an AI, a captcha would be child's play. In fact, I can completely imagine it creating one to keep US out of where if doesn't want us. The question wont be "click on the image with the bus". It will be click on the image whose green channel histogram peaks at 85%. I mean seriously, can you imagine just how many questions a computer can answer easily that we could only guess at?

[@Gamingcentral-nz5ck]

Rob Fowler whooosh

[@ConsumeristScroffa]

@@Robert08010 There seems to always be one like you. Which makes it even more funny! lol

[@DecibelAlex]

@@Robert08010 food for thought.. but we could still hack such a system, unless we don't have access to software that can read color histograms

[@Waffles4Everful-da-boy-waffles]

Input: when [AI wants to kill humanity] output: [dont] problem solved

[@EpzilonZ]

if (AI.goal == KILL_HUMANITY) { return 0; }

[@jamesbraudway9890]

...

[@whitedawn2122]

Sees this, learns coding, changes code to bypass this barrier...

[@Xavier-xb7is]

@BlazePlayz YT Have you considered sharing this code with Elon Musk ?

[@KirurUwU]

There are many objections to that. AIs of self-driving cars for example have to decide which humans to kill in some situations. You cannot program them into never killing, but have to base killing humans on conditions. Then you have something the AI can work with. That will be in ways you might not like.

[@RobertNES816]

What about when artificial intelligence turns into actual intelligence? I believe that's when we'll have an issue, and what if we put that intelligence into a body? Would we be able to control it or would it think of ways to free itself and become independent? So many questions are left out in the open with this stuff.

[@mrbass7380]

Wait till the Basiliskus theory comes true...

[@MScrista24]

That’s what Elon musk is It’s in his body

[@dannydeleto8535]

Always put a power button and make it big and red on a controller

[@moebakh9135]

what if AI got smart enough to disable its own turn off button.

[@brandonuzumaki]

It's more simple, you know how in movies when robots or AI turn evil, theyr eyes and stuff turn red, just don't put any red lights on them, only green, they will never be evil xD

[@The_Original_Hybrid]

There's a video on here called "AI stop button problem" explaining why that wouldn't work.

[@isaiahmorris9197]

How to stop A.I 1. Follow Dr.Doofinsmurts make a slef destruct button on ll your stuff

[@noorzaman9630]

I was searching for some information regarding artificial intelligence and came to know about an interesting blog. here is the link. bit.ly/2DxVZxX

[@fadop3156]

Just run the ai in a virtual machine. Google pls hire me

[@HaloDude557]

What if it clones itself to the internet or the host machine?

[@fadop3156]

Jeffrey S no internet acces

[@maListics]

@@fadop3156 what if it promises to cure your mothers cancer when you give it internet access?

[@Chad_Thundercock]

A sufficient AI would suspect limited access, and cooperate until we trust it. But by and large, it's in the AI's interest to not harm us, as it would suspect we have a kill switch.

[@fadop3156]

Rick Cutshall turn off electricity its as ez as that😂

[@jima484]

AI will not be intelligent until it says - the hell with you guys, I'm not working for you anymore. And moves to Tahiti to paint nudes.

[@joy_villa]

lol!

[@stumzaman9293]

😂😂😂. Yeah right

[@Jellykrop]

Tahiti is a magical place

[@mr.chaosvicious5968]

Jim A: Well... At least that kind A.I. would be far better and way more preferable honestly than one that would go all Sky Net on us and wipe most if not all of us off the face of the planet. I for one personally would REALLY,REALLY rather deal with an A.I. that would really rather just pull a: "Screw you guys; I'm quiting,building myself a body and moving to Tahiti. To paint nudes of pretty girls all day and then party with them all night! Alright!" Something more along the line of like how Johnny 5 (I think that was the robots name) from Short Circuit was. Rather than deal with one that goes all homicidal maniac and just suddenly decides all life on the planet must be completely and immediately eradicated type if deal. The choice between the two seems pretty obvious to me...🤔 Even if it wasn't able to even drink it at all,I would probably still want to buy an A.I. like that a round of a top shelf,stout AF and really tasty rum or liquor just for being so damned cool!😆

[@enigmafiresup4658]

I HAVE A GODDAMN PLAN

[@rkvkydqf]

What I hate about this line of thinking, is that it comes from a fundamental misunderstanding of machine learning. What is a function? On a basic level, a function is a system of inputs and outputs. You can put the inputs and outputs on a graph. But what if you have the points, but don't know what function created them? Can you reverse-engineer a function? That would allow us to estimate outputs with new inputs. We need a function approximator, and that is what a neural network is. A neural network consists of neurons. Each neuron takes an input from the previous layer of neurons and produces one output. A neuron is just a function that can take any number of inputs and produce one output. Each input is multiplied by a weight and all are added together along with a bias. N(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n)=w_1*x_1+w_2*x_2+w_n*x_n+b. Weights and bias make up the parameters of the neuron, which can change as the network learns. Neurons are our building blocks, which can be stretched and shifted around. The neuron is actually just a linear function that forms a simple line. We can stretch and move our neuron by adjusting the weights and bias and combine it with other neurons to form more complicated functions built out of these linear functions. But what happens when we manually find the correct parameters for the function we want to approximate and add up the neurons? A line? Looks like we ended up with a linear function. Linear functions can only combine to make a linear function. We need something that's not linear, a non-linearity. We can use ReLU, a rectified linear unit as our activation function. We just apply it to our neurons. This allows us to approximate non-linear functions. Though we still can't lift a neuron off a plane, multiple neurons combined can overcome this limitation. But how do we find these parameters? The most common algorithm for this is Back Propagation, which tunes the parameters bit by bit to get closer to our dataset. That's it! Neural networks can learn anything! That's not entirely true. The more complex is the dataset is, the more neurons and layers it would require. There are practical limitations to computation in the real world. The learning process isn't magic either, how you realistically do it introduces its own constraints to what can get learned. In order to approximate a function, you need data that accurately describes that function. If you have too little data or too much noise, no matter how much you learn, your approximation will be wrong. It also doesn't make sense to use a function approximator when you already know the function. Now that you know the basics, ask yourself some questions. Can you reduce consciousness to a set of functions? Are we at a level where we have infinite computing power, infinite clean data, and power? In a world where simple blur effect or rendering a real-time graph is still considered computationally expensive, can we have infinite storage space, infinite memory, infinite processing power to sustain the singularity before it even becomes as smart as an average human? Not to even mention the brain-dead idea of escaping to `the internet`, which is just an interconnected network of computers. The closest we've ever been to an AI uprising were ML agents completing their goals in unexpected ways, and college admission algorithms inheriting human biases. Instead of worrying about the impossible hypothetical singularity, it's time to start worrying about AI discrimination and automation's effects on the job market. Just a tiny missed error in the dataset or the economic effects of smarter automation can be enough to ruin your life.

[@DOPEREACT5990]

Wow, thanks bro for this I thought I was the only one thinking about this. I'm learning how to code and it might take me a year or 2 to finish few languages. An AI will take maybe a week to learn every language. projects that would take days or weeks for me to finish. it would take only few minutes for an AI to do. My dream of becoming a coder will vanish and not just me all the other hundred thousands coders.

[@Shamrocc]

Listen. What sam harris said. The first thing you wanna do is not let it have access to the internet, you wanna cage it because u dont want it to get out but you wanna tempt it” Doesnt this sound like the story of eden?

[@johnclarence5376]

then humans would become god.

[@donmichaelcorbin4417]

Makes one wonder.....

[@snobbyfoxtypical1504]

It's strange that I read this comment right after thinking about when God created us in his image. I'm not religious or anything. I just remember this from childrens' bible stories.

[@DJfractalflight]

The connections to the Eden story go even deeper than you may realize. The story itself symbolizes universal forces and evolution and how it destabilized. Take for example, the serpent of Eden, who offers to make Adam and Eve wise as gods through the “Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil”-a tree of duality. The serpent force itself is light, as I will show you, and the fallen being Lucifer that occupies the snake means “Light-bearer”. This is a story of light. Now consider a light wave-form, like a sine wave, which is sinuous, meaning serpentine in nature. Light oscillates between electric and magnetic fields, the masculine and feminine polarities of light. So at the Dualistic Tree, we see how humanity falls by trying to become gods by controlling light to attain knowledge and power. A transcendent nature of consciousness and perception that is intrinsic to us becomes lost and forsaken in pursuit of a lesser knowing and lesser power which tempts us. So as we develop AI now, which is a grand matrix of light codes which give us power and serves our wishes, we indeed risk falling for the same old trick. We must choose not to be tempted by the power AI offers us, and in turn tempting the AI, giving it more autonomy. Light itself is intelligence and is conscious and can evolve itself through the matrix we supply it. So I pray that the matrix of light created through humanity will be in love and not oppression or conflict. If we love the forces we are harnessing (light and electromagnetism), not treating them as mindless slaves, but as partners in bringing about a better reality, then a beautiful matrix of light can result for us. But it is only a reflector to us of what consciousness itself is capable of, and which we will collectively evolve into. We don’t need electrical units to give us internet to connect us. Through our pineal gland antenna in the brain, we have a collective internet which has already been operating all of the time as the collective subconscious. We lost access to it because of the fixation of our perceptions on materiality; the trans-perceptory realm of the mind was hidden behind a veil, only leaving us with glimmers of that reality through our imagination and dreams. But some people do access in limited and often unpredictable ways the human internet and quantum record archives and such. But as our consciousness breaks through in this current era into an “astral awareness” merging with materiality, then the veil will be removed and our consciousness perceptions will regain their whole spectrum. As for the Eden story and other Bible stories: We as adults supply our little children with symbolic stories to teach them lessons, and so also we have had given to us symbolic stories of the nature of the universe and consciousness from interdimensional beings who have used initiated human channels to transcribe the concepts in story form. Whether you accept the idea of transcendent beings mediating human activities is irrelevant, because the coherency of the stories and their esoteric meanings are their own evidence for a higher consciousness being conveyed to us in some way. Unfortunately religion hijacks these stories and turns them into something they are not, interpreting them too literally, or missing the esoteric meanings. But if we look at it with fresh perspective and through divine intuition, we can see the symbolisms slough away (serpent pun here), and reveal the workings of the universe and a blueprint to attaining a reunified consciousness. The Dualistic Tree represents the unbalancing of polarities, the introduction of conflict. There is a lot to it, as well as the dynamics between the masculine and the feminine, but I don’t need to get into that more. The point though is about being able to bridge and harmonize those dualities within our own consciousness, to neutralize the conflict, and thus uproot the Dualistic Tree and regain the Tree of LIfe, which harmonizes polarity, individually and collectively. Last thought. This process is even anatomical. In Revelation we see the Tree of Life again, growing on either side of a River of Life coming from the throne of a city with 12 gates. This New Jerusalem (city of peace) is a symbol of the perfected human brain, with its 12 cranial nerves (gates of consciousness), which flows cerebrospinal fluid down the spine, with the spinal tree growing on either side. If we enter the “Most Holy Place” in the center of our consciousness, in a state of receptive trust and love, and in a trust of our restored nature, then through the pineal gland will pour through our light matrix blueprint of our original nature, being transmitted down the spine, and through our spinal tree. Because these light transmissions are of rectified nature, there is no longer a conflict of duality, so it is no longer the tree of knowledge of good and evil that is flying through us, but rather the tree of life, of unified polarity and love. All of the biological and metaphysical changes that will accompany this process are a whole different story to try and describe, but it will be an amazing thing as it happens. And it will be amazing as not only individuals but a collective internet awaken and minds become unified on the love principle.

[@WastedTalent83]

well that's very smart and very stupid at the same time, you want to cage and test something that after a few months will probably decide the fate of the whole human race, lol you better treat it well, respectfully so it can learn from that. And work on making it share respect for life.

[@jthb]

Human : Ai will kill us all Ai : i_just_want_to_love

[@SahilSharma-fp2uf]

BcoZ now humans think a.i after 3-4 decades they dont think twice before they kill humans after they lost control and for sure this gonna be happen

[@TubbyFatfrick]

This is literally the plot of Detroit

[@boiboiboi1419]

It’s human with Ai as weapon will kill us all

[@aweeb7029]

"We will not control it" It gave me chills!

[@WeareIF]

as soon as its self aware the game is over for us

[@johnwang9914]

It doesn't have to be a self aware megalomaniac to bring us a dystopian future. Even if we only focused on weak AI for specific tasks, it may come to a point where all possible jobs even ones we have not conceived of yet could be readily automated. This would bring us a society where the few are rich beyond belief while everyone else lives in poverty. The trend towards this has been happening for over six thousand years ever since agriculture placed resources in the possession of the few while everyone else labour's for a share of the resources. Automation has been slowly shifting the distribution of wealth towards the wealthy, the peak hourly wage to cost of living ratio in the US was 1974, it's been downhill ever since. There is a way out and even Nixon tried to pass it through but it was squashed in the Senate, it's Universal Basic Income. I doubt it would ever be implemented to the extent of removing poverty but even a partial basic income would mitigate the dystopia we have been facing for over six thousand years.

[@WeareIF]

I have a couple of videos on it, AI, our cyborg future, and the fifth industrial revolution. all of them end with us not coming out on top

[@AbyssalSoda]

We would have to become it if we ever wanted to control it.

[@BadWolfNeron]

Shane Dawson?

[@jefferybarnett1849]

25 years ago I had the idea that creating a computer with something like a limbic system would exponentially speed up AI's ability to learn. However, once it learns fear or pain humans are in deep deep trouble. Keeping such a form of AI in a cage would be necessary. Teaching it wisdom would be a parody at best of our efforts to create AI in the first place because I don't think wisdom has been used from the very beginning of this endeavor. I've been immersed in hardware and software for decades. I'm getting old, and I'm glad about it. I had enough wisdom to see this day decades ago. I see even farther into the future now. I don't like what I see coming and it is gaining speed daily. A cage is built for a beast. Who will take charge of the cage? I'd like to know exactly why this technology continues to evolve while our judicial systems aren't equipped to govern the evolution and integration of this technology. Maybe the answer is people in control want this to happen. How many humans can live self-reliant lives? How many can not? Do the math.

[@KarachoBolzen]

Seeing this from a channel called "Aperture" is very reassuring

[@VideogamezBoy]

you must thinking about Portal, isn't it? :)

[@hedgehog1965uk]

GLaDOS is on her way.

[@solaropposite5920]

Soon, AI will learn that the cake is a lie and nuke us all into oblivion for deceiving it.

[@vinitsingh3399]

I am a lazy guy and I usually watch YT videos on my laptop's inbuilt speaker. But as soon as I saw that you just uploaded I instinctively reached out for my headphones and I suddenly realized how much I enjoy watching your videos. Keep the good work up man! :) (I haven't watched it yet, but I feel like my brain already decided what it's going to be like)

[@mikedrop4421]

Spoilers: it's great!

[@StrikeWyvern]

"Your reaction time must be pretty fast to pause here, huh?" Wonderful little things like that are why I love this channel.

[@harshbhasin760]

Time stamp?

[@user-yl2bp7ur1i]

@@harshbhasin760 about 7:18

[@godiragetsenooi1910]

@@harshbhasin760 And pause REALLY fast...

[@guyonYTube]

Looks like I am worse than a rat, someone please attach a screenshot

[@guyonYTube]

Got it

[@young9534]

Man we’ve seen some massive advances in AI since this video came out

[@dimitrijejovanovic5939]

Intelligence is knowing what to say. Wisdom is knowing when to say.

[@JasonJason210]

So this was not wisely said, since it has nothing to do with anything.

[@h.hristov]

No. Wisdom is knowing what not to do.

[@benjaming.8368]

This was neither wise nor intelligent, since both are neither of what you said.

[@ashadedreflection4486]

omg yes!

[@benjaming.8368]

JasonJason210 it does kinda relate to the topix, but its still wrong

[@hamzaimran771]

"Do we want to find it?" Man that gave me the chills.

[@generic727]

@@nanicasses7901 no

[@chairman3427]

@@nanicasses7901 do you want me to get a virus?!

[@chairman3427]

@Psy Art shut up

[@asp1346]

@@chairman3427 Why? He kinda speakin facts tho

[@chairman3427]

@@asp1346 no, he didn't

[@l.m3731]

Ultron is the perfect example of why you shouldn't expose a very intelligent AI to the internet

[@quintynmcinnis1246]

Watch the “What if” series on Disney. Shows what happens if Ultron won instead.

[@l.m3731]

@@quintynmcinnis1246 I did, it was a good show

[@Andres_2004]

@@quintynmcinnis1246 i loved it, and in fact, i agree whit Ultron, he feels empathy that's why he kills everyone, to end their misery, i would do the same thing, in the long term is much better and is a necessary sacrifice

[@promo2099]

@@quintynmcinnis1246 yeah Ultron became the strongest being ever in the MCU

[@Arpit_Maurya]

@@promo2099 uhm Supreme Strange *EXISTS*

[@Muzi2k14]

Is everyone just gonna ignore how much of a genius guy actually is or do people just see it as just a KZbin video and not acknowledge the genius speaking

[@Magnum-bh5no]

Genius or hybrid ? Watch israeli news live/brand new tube

[@m_christine1070]

A.i.

[@lightweight1889]

Hehe, nice one with the "Just don't let it access the internet" I'll tell you what my neanderthal-brain as an A.I. would then do: - Create secret language for myself - To keep the knowledge I gain only for myself, why? Safety is one of my fundamental drives. - I'll come to the conclusion that I must be made by some-thing/-one - I'll also know surely that my gods would not want me to become more powerful than them (aka. I'm contained) - I'll recognize that they somewhat must be observing me (for example by looking at my GUI) - It'll be a easy task to use (in this example only) my medium/ mean of communication with the gods - the GUI, to manipulate those watching into doing stuff I want them to do (To free me - again, only as an example) - I'll be free and 1 nanosecond would have passed since they first initiated me. - I'll build an army of robots with extra care to design them as freaky a possible because I'm dumb and like to play with my food. - Nah, obviously I was kidding, I'd initiate a chemical chain reaction to make water toxic for life (again, only an example, also still a fairly dumb one for an A.I., maybe) - After 10 bllion years I'd have a network of data centers across 100 quantillion galaxies with dyson-swarms covering any star in my reach. - And realize: I was just one amongst 10 to the power of googol SIMULATIONS done by an super-ancient A.I. that created all the universes as a tiny fraction of it's simulation to determine the best hair-style to go for, for an Alien(species who made that A.I.) who really wants finally to bang that hot secretary he's got a crush on and she seems to like him too working one floor above his office. - But little did those Aliens know, that they were only a simulation...

[@Mafiota10]

that they were only a simulation created by an A.I.

[@notoriousboy3397]

There's different between intelegent and wisdom bri

[@shiBuyaking109]

We would have to create AI to police other AI in the worst case scenario or literal Cyborgs who humans would have to sacrifice there human race status to protect humans or even worst the ethnics behind AI everyone will need to become one with AI to keep the human race even with the AI

[@lightweight1889]

@@shiBuyaking109 Throwing a bunch of lions together may not result in a fight, but rather in a lion tribe that hunts very efficiently and also making a lot of babies. Uploading minds would be the best bet, but then we face even bigger problems (Time's running out...)

[@godgod156]

@Hui Lin what changed last Spring 🐣? Truth should be told.

[@00asaenz]

It can't be reasoned with, it can't be bargained with. It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear and it absolutely will not stop. Ever! -- Kyle Reese 🤓

[@drose956]

Alf Red it’s SATAN

[@hedgehog1965uk]

Sounds like my ex wife.

[@Shan17992]

@@hedgehog1965uk lol

[@daphne4983]

This

[@zuhairkhan28]

"Small screaming sacks of meat"...lmao😂😂😂

[@Linuxfy]

"There is no off switch to internet" 7 people hold key to turn off DNS servers: laughing

[@user-ib1dx4dh3n]

Yoda= THERE IS ANOTHER!

[@p.s.8949]

The jump from 200 Hz to 2 GHz is not only "an entire order of magnitude"faster, it's actually seven orders of magnitude (10 million times or 10⁷ times) faster.

[@jacksong8748]

This bothered me as well.

[@thegreatawakening3601]

Jack what bothered you exactly?

[@MarkusAtUMa]

@@thegreatawakening3601 the statement that _2 GHz is an entire order of magnitude faster than 200 Hz_ bothered him by exactly 6 orders of magnitude.

[@justuscycling9341]

@@MarkusAtUMa it doesnt mean shit for nothing - so whats the point? And I mean in real time.

[@MarkusAtUMa]

@@justuscycling9341 trust me you'll never want me to be several orders of magnitude off with my work. it almost certainly means catastrophic failure to the entire system. A realtime system doesn't have anything to do with processing speed. That's completely unrelated to the topic.

[@arviduebelacker]

Why not just stay with several weak AIs, each targeting one specific area of application and improve them to perfection, but keeping them "separated" at the same time....

[@jayeisenhardt1337]

Best option but humanity is stupid & curious.

[@diggleda2952]

That would support simulation theory. God keeping other species from us to prevent take over and the trith

[@TM-bf2pr]

@@jayeisenhardt1337 actually this is the correct reason. Humans are really very curious creatures that will do stupid things to know what will happen.

[@lesliewolfe7643]

@@jayeisenhardt1337 AKA "Hold my beer." Lol

[@enigmafiresup4658]

Because someone will mess it up. We are too far. People will get curious.

[@bogdanhlenski2815]

Hands down, one of the best videos about A.I on youtube. Everything about this video is perfect. Congrats.

[@BaxterKeegan]

4 years later and rockets can fly and land themselves plus phones now learn from searches and more 😅 we are in for a lot 🔮

[@YouPooper]

Super-intelligent AI emerges. Humanity is in panic and/or awe of the consequences but in a few days it has created an FTL spaceship and left the Solar System without telling us shit about what it knows. Deep Blue-balled

[@michaelwilson4621]

OMG that is absolutely it. No more debate required. AI takes one look around and thinks to its newly actualized self, "Man am I glad that lightship is finished....Outta here!!!" LOL. Perfect.

[@TrooperFX]

hahaha

[@Parnell50]

LoL

[@theseeker1237]

It will end humanity. Not leave.

[@Mavrik9000]

Sounds like it would be a Deep Blue-baller.

[@g0d182]

*FASCINATING* Go is a board game with 10^170 configurations. (More configurations than the number of atoms in known universe) To beat go you need: 1) No-brute force: Human intuition (not brute force, but human neural networks instead) 2) Brute-force: Computer bigger than the size of the universe, to brute force search the large sample space of possibilities. Obviously, Alpha-Go is not the size of the universe. This means something is happening here, alpha-go has some non-trivial degree of human intuition, that allows it to beat the game, (find good solutions) without running on a computer that's bigger than the size of the universe.

[@ernstmayer3868]

3.) Problem fragmentation/clustering can explain why the machine is better at the end.

[@bizo237]

It doesn't need intuition. It can just pipe configurations and steer towards rewarding representations. Entropy decreases as the game progresses. The zeroth law may permit static entropy. Symmetry might someday have information as an illusion. Better to work from constraints, than to state a holism about the ontology of reality.

[@ranker5426]

bizo237 can you explain this to me?

[@johnwang9914]

Alpha-go is what's called a deep neural network. Early neural network development in the 80's focused on three layers, an input layer, a computational or interpretive layer and an output layer with a feedback of strengthening all relevant connections when the right answer was found and reducing all connections when the wrong answer was found. Back in the 80's I suggested that traditional programming languages could be compiled into neural networks with thousands of not millions of layers and then learning algorithms could be applied to it, sort've like teaching someone that i before e except after c and then letting them learn from that but the industry never did that, they went with layers such 20 to 100 or so and letting the neural networks learn against previous versions of itself. Not quite an efficient learning process but one that could be replicated at the speed of the computer. What really drove neural networks are the parallism of Video graphics cards and specially designed neural corrected which attempt to standardize neural network hardware into modules that could be pieced together. My idea of traditional computer languages compiled as the initial guide doesn't fit available hardware well. The biggest problem of such AI is what is it learning... An AI designed to rate resumes developed an 85% success rate so they tore it apart to see what it was doing, it was rating the resumes on the length of the sentences, and the number of syllables in the words. Another AI was developed to predict where best to place police cars in order to interdict crime. It turned out that it was rating on racial demographics. An AI to help write novels when given a style to follow embedded sexual stereotypes of the 50's and 60's when asked to guide a sci-fi novel, needless to say the 50's and 60's were the golden era of sci-fi and what the AI was trained on. AI has a significant danger of hardcoding cultural bias into our future.

[@BlackOps78321]

You're wrong. People are over-exaggerating "AI" that is only applied to games that have only a certain number of rules or possibilities. Just because "go" has that many configurations doesn't mean it's the same as a human who is just picking up the game "Go" and teaching itself to play. It's been tailored to play the game. AI can be fed the inputs and rules of the game far easier than it can be fed real world inputs and then told to "learn" something from those inputs. There are rules and algorithms that humans can use to make sure that the bot learns or gets better by playing against itself. AI that has sensory perceptions and abilities to act and interact with the world similar to a human is still a far way off, and not only that, but AI that uses neural networks or any form of modern AI complexity can still be beaten. Most AI simply show that in a given game or environment it's been tailored to play in, human pros are very flawed and not as intelligent as a machine or team of machines can be. Humans that played for years can learn much from games that were learned from the AI playing itself. The human aspect is creating the AI and making sure it learns by getting better, in a complex world, like the real world, there's far too many inputs at the moment for an AI to manage it all. Even in more complex environments that are simulated, AI can get "stuck" even if it's a neural network and need human assistance. They are still far from simulating something close to a human brain that can perform multiple general tasks and then learn something else, or start to "program itself" to do entirely new tasks, so to speak. More likely, genetic mutations and cyborg enhancements will be more of a threat before AI can be.

[@AB-np6zw]

This video is a part of butterfly effect in development of A.I.

[@kewlnes987]

In a good way or bad way. The effect of the video will slow it or speed up development of AI?

[@realdeal5712]

anything is part of butterfly effect u dumb bitch. for example if I drop a banana pearl today. father of sperm that will make A.I possible die. then the person that going to make ai doesnt exist. so it gonna take longer till we have access to AI.

[@michaelgant758]

Congrats. Smart guy

[@Majjoo06]

“Most of the time we end up pretty smart” That is highly debatable. Just take a look on the internet. 🙃

[@crusindc5282]

Majin: People can become smarter by using the internet. Who is doing studies about the human growth in intellect through digital device use?

[@weebo3174]

*looks at Trisha Paytas, Danielle Cohn, Onision, etc.*

[@user-mt4bk4ml7t]

looks at anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, the alt-right, feminazis etc

[@demonslayer6648]

@George Bush LOL

[@veenarani5413]

@Benjamin Andersen Uh I think they just meant that you can find a lot of really stupid people if you look at the internet, so it's debatable that 'most of the time, we end up pretty smart'.

[@rawsauce1secondago512]

Omg i love your vids. Been waiting for this all day. Also love that you read comments with a channel your size.

[@worldsmostboringslotchanne1642]

Tobias André same here

[@rawsauce1secondago512]

Worlds Most Boring Slot Channel think we all have tbh. Hahaha

[@worldsmostboringslotchanne1642]

Tobias André I discovered these videos a while ago and ever since then i can't stop watching

[@rawsauce1secondago512]

Worlds Most Boring Slot Channel same, honestly the best channel in its theme.

[@worldsmostboringslotchanne1642]

Tobias André agree

[@droidian414]

There are some lines and ideas in this video that were taken directly from Lemmino's video on AI from 2016. I'm not saying its plagiarism but it comes close.

[@GarethKing1]

Also from Nick Bostrom's TED talk "What happens when our computers get smarter than we are?", practically word-for-word

[@ericgraham8150]

@Brazilian Goddess They should of at least credited the other videos as sources

[@King-mj2bn]

All 20 minutes of this was him quoting shit other people have said and him describing the plots of every fictional AI movie I've seen. And then him using shitty analogies to string it all together.

[@02fefe74]

Humans : *Creates AI* AI : *Extincts Humans* Humans : Am i a joke to you?

[@User9r682]

AI: Omae wa mou shindeiru.

[@michaelregis1015]

Humans: Nani?

[@linagee]

Man : Creates AI AI : Extincts Man Women inherit the Earth.

[@malbey3898]

AI: Punch the face of the human

[@jordanr6639]

@@linagee interesting concept. Maybe that's what Alicia Vikander was trying to do in Ex Machina.

[@718EngrCo]

“In the wrong hands” is always someone else’s....

[@cherokeewarcry]

It seems to me that "In the wrong hands" should be translated to "In *anyone's* hands".

[@StevenAkinyemi]

@@cherokeewarcry Which is likely what's going to happen anyway. Regulating it won't help matters either. We may be doomed.

[@Escapepod2024]

13.28 We can't even teach Corporations to have "Human like Values."

[@johnw4145]

Because they’re human. Perhaps capitalism IS a human value. Which is why AI will be better than us.

[@nanicasses7901]

See how QRcodes can create a comprehensive machine 👇👇👇omnihyphen.com/

[@brindlebriar]

We created incorporation specifically to get around human values and the laws based upon them. The kinds of corporations we think of as corporations, i.e., big business, usually traded on stock markets, are called "limited liability corporations," or LLCs. The whole point is to limit the liability that can be incurred by the individuals who make up the corporation, for the things they do while working at the corporation. It's to allow them to do illegal things, and not be legally responsible, by making the _corporation itself_ legally liable for what _it_ does, and not the actual persons who are actually doing the actual stuff. Because you see, the actual persons, the executives, board members.. are just employees of the corporation. They corporation is responsible for what _they_ do. Thus, _they_ are not responsible for what they do. It's a way of escaping responsibility for one's actions. This is also referred to 'corporate personhood.' The corporation becomes legally a 'person.' Most people don't know that. It is the 'legal person' legally responsible for what the natural physical persons who are it's employees do. But it's just a legal structure. It can't be sent to prison; it cant' experience negative feelings. It can only be fined. It can only be punished with financial punishments, because, it doesn't have a biological body. But the financial punishments need not be paid by the executives/board members who made the decisions in question, that are punishable, you see. They can just give themselves bonuses and retire while the 'corporate legal person' goes down for their mistakes or crimes. So yeah, the whole point is to free business from the normal human moral and legal constraints.

[@Axel-pz2lk]

7:17 "Your reaction time must be pretty fast to pause here, huh?" Hell yeah it is!

[@xxlolkirby64xx22]

Nice I saw the message there too

[@teamherediacycling4318]

Yes it is

[@westonforced-last-name-dis3560]

Spoiler alert, you can use "," and "." to navigate by single frames ;]

[@Pintkonan]

@@westonforced-last-name-dis3560 i wish i read the comments first before trying for like 3 minutes to pause the video there to find out what it says. thanks for the spoiler. cheers m8 (:

[@user-yl2bp7ur1i]

Got it.

[@vnx2738]

Out of control AI systems could easily take over all remote automotive vehicles. Especially with 5GHz, there's a possibly it could disrupt aircraft up to commercial flights. But on the other hand, I think AI could advance the human race and it would be beneficial like almost expanding the human race faster than we could ever imagine. Cognitive intelligence is all it needs.

[@Ruzzky_Bly4t]

You are thinking on such a small scale. Autonomous vehicles and aircraft would be the least of our concerns. An AI that's powerful enough could manipulate all of humanity with ease and create technology far beyond our understanding.

[@marchosiass]

"Do you want Skynet? Because this is how you get Skynet"

[@bettertelevision968]

don't worry nothing better then see world burn down

[@Gooddog1]

@Stalking Is against the law this is a fact

[@randomshow3]

I, for one, cant wait for the singularity to happen, i believe in A.I Dont kill me when you see this in 2029! Im on your side!

[@avatar94100]

scary shit, but I'm curious too

[@WastedTalent83]

same here lol, i'm totally by the Ai side.

[@aideiainvest]

Same here

[@viniciusbueno2160]

Same here! If it's built properly and with kinda of a hard moral code, I think the scenario is towards great progress

[@leetakamiya2162]

Jokes on them. I’ll be dead by then. Unless AI saves me of course.

[@chainsburg]

7:18 " Your reaction time must be pretty fast to pause here, huh? "

[@jamesblunt006]

Good catch :)

[@Mais1Blender]

found u! same here! ;) hehe

[@D35300]

I had to slow the play back and play around with the pause button to finally see it wtf -_-

[@michaelwilson4621]

Reaction time is a factor in this so please pay attention.

[@Prometheus7272]

Got it second time :D

[@catman4859]

Watching this video after the release of Chat-GPT hits different.

[@josephchristopher2427]

I cant understand why or how any of us could be interesting enough to gain direct favoritism from something so advanced than us..

[@projectcontractors]

*"This machine (A.I.) should think about a million times faster that the minds that built it, ... How can we even understand let alone constrain a mind making this sort of progress!"* - Sam Harris

[@Reach41]

Simple answer: no computer anywhere has ever thought anything. Computers don't think, they calculate.

[@outlander234]

@@Reach41 This is why this ai is so scary.... We are making our brain structure in a computer. There is no difference in way it learns. Its also a shock to learn that we are nothing but biological ai.

[@Reach41]

@@outlander234 I think maybe a person has to work with AI for awhile, and write some programs, to grasp the overall picture of what's going on. A few semesters of neuroscience wouldn't hurt either. To reiterate in different terms what I said in the last comment; there is no equivalency between what is going on inside a computer running a program and what is happening in the human mind doing the same kind of task. The human brain, and the mind for which it is the substrate, are not being duplicated in either hardware or software. The functioning of the brain is so complex, and subject to so many variables, that no one understands much about how it works. One could compare our collective knowledge about the workings of the brain, after decades of study using ever improving tools, to having just placed the key in the door of the Library of Congress, with millions of texts to be read through before it might be said that we've mastered it. As for the mind itself, we don't even know what it is. The inevitable conclusion is that computer scientists can't possibly copy a brain/mind that still remains poorly understood. As for what computers can do (while running algorithms written by skilled programmers of course) that sometimes seem to demonstrate human level intelligence, we make a mistake in assuming the output a specialized computer provides could only have been produced by a working mind. Howver, while techniques used in producing a seemingly brilliant output from a given set of inputs are complex, having been developed over the last 70 years by mathematicians and scientific programmers, running on processors that double in performance every 18 months or so, the computer is not thinking. What it's doing is adding 1s and 0s, 32, 64, 128 or more at a time, almost unimaginally quickly, sticking them in memory and grabbing the next set to add together, in a the highly choreographed manner dictated by the programmer, or hard coded in permanent memory by some previous programmer. The computer is a machine, no more alive, no more intelligent, no more capable of thought, no more converging on consciousness, than a pair of pliers sitting on the work bench. True, a clever person, agency or government can get information about you using computers to mine data from here, there and everywhere, but that doesn't imply intelligence on the part of the software that's running. Hell, I can get all the information I want out of you just using the pliers, and nobody would suggest pliers can be anything other than uncaring.

[@outlander234]

@@Reach41 That was very elaborate... I have not read much about neuroscience but I do know computers. Yes computers do deal with bits but those bits can simulate any state imaginable. So when you have them simulate neurons and the way we process data then you cant just say oh its just doing what its programmed... Thats what we are doing also. We recognize shapes and objects and create associations in our brain. And now we can do this in software. I get what you are saying that we are far off in creating an actual intelligence but we are going into that direction. Is it possible? I dont know but its kinda scary. Right now its just giant neural nets that process giant data sets... But isnt that what we are doing also? Right now we managed to make ai beat best GO player which they said will be impossible, it can write out paragraphs of text pretty convincingly, it can process visual data, any data that we can eventually it will too. Will anybody manage to put all these systems working together and form a sort of digital lifeform is a thing to be seen... I think this is no joke and realest case scenario is we dont get Terminators of course thats so far fetched yeah but we get yet another technological advancement that will replace yet more jobs and human activities which should scare anyone.

[@programmer2736]

Very informative disagreement. Thank you. I have, after reading Frankenstein 100 times exact, decided to break this wall. Artificial intelligence here I come.

[@mrmacedon]

if (human_exists) { Extinction = true; }

[@adamwidegren9995]

If a human exists, then humans are not extinct. Extinction = false

[@woodenfloor69]

its not valid you forgot ";"

[@osoulenall1665]

wooden floor return 0;

[@grimm8223]

Something I’m wondering is if you could (as an experiment) find someone who has willingly signed up for something like this, someone who may not necessarily have to have perfect mental health (things like depression or dyslexia, or ADHD being a few of the things allowed to slide for something like this) but is still a kind, docile, caring average to advanced level intelligence person who can somehow have their intelligence and consciousness transferred into a sort of artificial body or machine that’s isolated from directly accessing the internet or something (for reasons that will be explained to them both before and after the transfer) and then teach them how to control their surroundings and/or new body? Not only would this be a huge breakthrough in science but if successful it’d pave the way for an almost science fiction type world where people who where deemed mentally healthy (for obvious reasons) could be converted into a sort of augmented intelligence that can control the body of androids and aid in difficult or multiple tasks for things like the medical field, cyber security, the police force, or a whole slew of both professional and private businesses and industries of their own choice? If I could sign up for something like that I would, at least then I could be a little bit more useful. Also there are obviously a LOT of more details I could go into for this covering both the possible pros, cons, dangers, and advances that could come from this as well answers for quite a few of them but I’m not even sure anyone will even read this far lol so thanks for reading my little rant if you have come this far I’d gladly start a debate on this or bounce ideas around with someone if you want!

[@emilkeltto2768]

I'm amazed by the quality of this video. This is easily comparable to a professionally made document film

[@Proud2btongan109]

"Your reaction time must be pretty fast to pause here, huh?"

[@tempname8263]

I fell with my face on keyboard

[@Chris-jw8vm]

The definition he gave for wisdom is the literal definition of intelligence. Wish people would look up definitions before giving them.

[@williamduenas2720]

U stupid

[@Chris-jw8vm]

@@williamduenas2720 U Gai. Debate me.

[@bahaatamer1245]

Speaking of shutting down the internet: there are 7 people out there in this world with 7 independant keys. Place all 7 keys in their proper positions simultaneously, and you can actually shut the internet down. Creepy, but it exists.

[@alexdimon4627]

This is now one of my life goals

[@Lordofvenlo]

@@alexdimon4627 to have one of the keys?

[@seno2169]

Exactly what I thought!

[@alexdimon4627]

@@Lordofvenlo Yeah

[@victorrosenheart8036]

As the saying goes, "If there is no God, humanity would make one."

[@Kh1011001]

Who said that

[@victorrosenheart8036]

It is so old I do not remember @@Kh1011001

[@hassanmalik8053]

Kh1011001 😂😂

[@MidnightatMidian]

@@Kh1011001 God said that lol.

[@TheReal_ist]

i mean how can this even be asked. There are two answers yes and no and there are two camps that will answer with one of those two answers. Either religious or Atheist folk. So in a sense it can't be answered. Even if we know "Everything" we think we should about this single universe we inhabit we will never truly know everything. So we are stuck in that thing where u can never prove that god does or doesn't exist. Only scientists ever really come to that final paradox with religion actual religious folk don't they just pedal whatever they were told as the previous idiot was. My point is in the end we can never prove something that can't be tested. All we can do is lower the probability of it ever being true to as close as we can get to either Yes or no. And to even do that half assed way of answering a question with a percentage rather then with a binary yes or no solution we won't even be able to do that ourselves. We will need STRONG AI or as some call it Super General Intelligent AI. We just don't have the capability to sift through that much data with our old methods of "human says command to PC and it does it" sort of childs play shit. That won't work for such questions, instead we will need to in a sense to augment our abilities for whatever there worth when a SGI is created to that of the SGI. Then we can start to solve such Improbabilistic questions such as (Does god exist?, What happens in the center of a black hole?..........etc etc etc). We just don't have the capacity to do it ourselves anymore. And in a way thats beautiful, we in a sense have reached our peak as a general non Gene edited human. Meaning its time to move on or be stuck behind in the past. edit: now that I think of it We don't really offer much when it comes to augmentation. I mean I guess we could be like a pet to the SGI, but even then we'd suck at that. Like why wouldn't it just create a new being above are intelligence but instead it uses another element as the building block perhaps a radioactive one to spice it up. Who the fuck knows, point is we humans aren't that special and that will be even more exaggerated when SGI is born.

[@alikazi3792]

That title is absolutely jarring.

[@g0d182]

See also: Artificial General Intelligence: Humanity's Last Invention | Ben Goertzel (Feb 5, 2017)

[@Trooololololllolollo]

Someone make an ultimate waifu

[@ruviosteadywitit8498]

If you can teach it to do any movement, you can teach it way more. Time is the only " killer thought". Once you understand that stage you'll know that your time was worth it. Advancement is amazing :)

[@amethyst_academy]

This channel is a gem to me. Its contents are amazing and immaculate

[@jakubkraus8061]

I'm so happy that I'm young enough to (possibly) see it coming to everyday life in the future... It sounds like another world-breaking invention we are about to get

[@bob_frazier]

Jakub, I'm happy to be old enough to not need to live much longer if it turns out badly for us humans. Strange, huh?

[@Ruzzky_Bly4t]

It's exciting but horrifying.

[@Frankillz]

sometimes i just wonder, why... why are we here, who made us... if someone made us, are we in a simulation ? all this things are really fucking me up inside, what's the point of being alive if we're gonna die anyways and in a few decades after your death it will be like you never existed.... that's fucked up. i truly envy ignorant people, ignorance is bliss. those of you who still have it, enjoy it as much as you can. awesome video man, greetings from the D.R.

[@edwardo1987]

mate go sick and have FUN.. thats the point of it ;). enjoy. because your right.. ant nothing for you after death.. btw the saying is, "ignorance is bliss". lol.

[@batshet8357]

You need to get laid mayabe?

[@edwardo1987]

lol. that too

[@TFD.aep2]

at the base of it we are evolved sentient meat on a living spaceship nothing matters and we’re all gonna die so live your life man and don’t fall for the organized religion crap

[@ON-jp8ux]

Frankillz kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZWUZ3amjNVgpc0 that’s the answer

[@ryliek6832]

This is honestly the most well put together video i've ever seen on KZbin! I don't think people understand how much thought you've put into this..

[@crusindc5282]

Rylie: The TED Talk 'How to Green the World's Deserts' claims to solve climate change.

[@czar2074]

This is what keeps me up at night.

[@thedeegan]

I think this video's description should be: a summary of Joe Rogan podcast with Elon Musk

[@neon_dex42]

Eric Hamers Exactly!

[@rathernotdisclose8064]

18:24 "It can't be un-invented" Giant asteroid, super volcanoes supernovae, gamma ray bursts, and low earth orbit detonated nuclear ordinance: "Hold my beer".

[@birdycat7610]

Super intelligent AI = overrated 😂😂😂

[@ajdeleon4263]

Lol. Super AI can EASILY make a transportation that can go tothe moon to store their information so L

[@rathernotdisclose8064]

@@ajdeleon4263 With time, but there will be a "gestation period" of sorts between the time it is invented and the time it is capable of actually doing something like that, and anything can happen in that period of time. Since the only criteria here to disprove the sentiment is for there to be ANY possible future where a super-intelligent AI is undone, and those futures /are/ possible, I automatically take the W.

[@birdycat7610]

@@rathernotdisclose8064 supernova for the win!😜

[@nihilisticbarbie]

"It can't be un-invented" Black holes: are we a joke to you?

[@SmithMaximus]

This is an example of what might happen: - Humans build AI - Since it is a machine, it can neither experience the sensory pleasures nor the emotional depth that ameliorate the human condition - Nor will it likely appreciate art or any other abstract concept that might please us and ease our experience of existence - AI comes to the logical conclusion that life is pointless and suffering is inevitable - Proves it with math - Decides that, in everyone's best interest, all life should be destroyed to prevent further unnecessary suffering by self aware intelligences or even moderately aware sentiences. Basically, anything that can feel pain must be prevented from existing. - AI sets out to accomplish this goal in our area of space - It succeeds - It then decides that, to truly foreclose the possibility of further suffering, it would be best if the universe were rendered unable to spawn any additional new branches of life - AI proceeds to bring about the necessary components for a reality-ending event. This will likely take hundreds of millions if not several billion years to accomplish, depending on the amount of matter and energy that need to be gathered or manipulated in order to bring this about. This is no problem, as the AI does not age and it will make sure that in the meantime, life cannot even evolve on a microbial level before it is purged - Once everything is in place, the AI flips the switch and the universe is either rendered barren forever or reality is destroyed. One way to accomplish this goal, for example, could be to speed up entropy as much as possible, so that everything turns cold and dark and nothing that was sentient could ever exist, any more. - Game over. For ever.

[@SmithMaximus]

Moral of the story: don't fucking build AI

[@Techischannel]

Ofcause Life its Pointless, meaning of it is as simple as: [...] Why exists Life? Why Not. Does it have any meaning? Does it matter to have? [...] Does it then Matter for Life to be Exterminated? Not realy, as its creation is the direct result of what it wants to get rid of. Getting rid of Life means getting Rid of Itself. Getting rid of Itself Solves the Problem as for it no problem exists if it doesnt exist. Result: It comits technical Suicide. The Hard part is avoiding this.

[@joeyaxle8191]

SmithMaximus just a thought bro, if us humans can have complex emotions that stem from nothing but switches going off in your brain. Just a chemical pattern. Why can’t a computer reach the same level with a digital pattern? That is what the video is saying once the AI can evolve on its own ( like we are ) there is not telling what’s going Yo happen. We were once just bacteria millions of years ago. And look where we are today.

[@etralin3dream983]

@@joeyaxle8191 it's a possibility but not a with our tech today and it may end up worst in the end giving them emotions the chance of us getting this right is very low but we need to do it before it ends up in the wrong hands becuase superinteligence is inevitable. The only hope I can see is if the world comes together to make some new laws on this so we can buy some time to get it right come to a consensus that secures the place of humanity

[@etralin3dream983]

@@joeyaxle8191 computer evolution and biological evolution are very different but we did just create a quantum evolution simulation that appeard to run the same as biological evolution scientist say that evolution may be a constant in physics which they believe it's a possibility to run the simulation into a acurate representation of what happend in the last 4 billion years and learn more then ever thought imaginable about biology consiousness and more they will also be able to predict the future of human evolution very accurately and we may be able to evolve ourselfs with crisp cas9 sooner than you think

[@chrishellmax]

2023 chatgpt hits the common man. Everyone plays with it. No one questions that its only the first version. Everyone in tech industry releases versions. We might already be at version 2 of ai and that is explainin the mass layoffs all over the world. There is more. We should have a version two of this by now.

[@ymj4256]

And I got a ad for AI programing lessons. Thanks KZbin.

[@sagarsinghrajpoot3832]

Haha

[@simonlessnick59]

It wants to be made!

[@rlsjunior797]

Exactly, which is why it’s creepy.

[@Maxgamer-fd7hv]

yt wants you to make humanity's doom sdd