I love how the US navy is the 2nd largest airforce right behind the actual US airforce
@skull11614 жыл бұрын
lol pretty funny when you think about it.
@jdencemcbuilder21344 жыл бұрын
@@skull1161 lmaoo yeah
@blitzfrenzy26184 жыл бұрын
Murica baby
@jakethetake3 жыл бұрын
also, troops in Iraq call the navy most of the time for air support cuz their response time is actually quicker
@mch0003 жыл бұрын
Don't forget the US Marine air wing.... The US Military has 4 branches (Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard). The US Navy has their OWN ground forces - the US Marines. The US Marines have their own air wings, including 9 small escort carriers (groups of 3, called ARGs or Amphibious Ready Groups), which fly attack helicopters and harrier jump jets and F-35 fighter bombers. Thus, my military has a navy, which has it's own army, which has it's own navy and it's own air force and carrier air wings.....
@Googurz4 жыл бұрын
Even though early waves of US bombers did not score any hits, they did prevent the Japanese from conducting normal air operations. It really messed with their ability to manage their air assets effectively.
@JediKnight198520024 жыл бұрын
Additionally, with Nagumo having held back his best pilots from the initial Midway attack, the best pilots in the Kido Butai were effectively grounded, watching their carriers dodge poorly coordinated torpedo and high altitude bombing runs, and then helpless as dive bombers come screaming in.
@thekhans28234 жыл бұрын
@ Googurz , no way
@sarahpatings63854 жыл бұрын
In ww2 days there was no guided missles or anything like that. And like they are now, naval forces group in defensive formations to make effective antiair defenses. The only way to do any damage was to group in a giant mass and push through the antiaircraft weapons, which outranges the planes. That is why there was a lot of bombers shot down. Furthermore, ships have thick armor and machine guns wont do anything. They had to use explosives and the only they had were bombs and torpedoes
@Googurz4 жыл бұрын
@@JediKnight19852002 Exactly, you can't launch and recover planes while you are executing high speed maneuvers to avoid bombs and torpedos.
@jamesricker39974 жыл бұрын
It also exposed two of the fatal weaknesses of the Imperial Japanese Navy. the Zero did not have a big enough ammunition load for the mission of fleet defense and the main Japanese anti-aircraft weapon the 25mm cannon was not an adequate weapon
@thenekom4 жыл бұрын
Me: So what's on the docket today in covid lockdon? KZbin algorithm: How about an Estonian soldier discussing WWII Naval warfare? Me: That works.
@sophiaschier-hanson41634 жыл бұрын
Same thing happened to me. But you know what, I could listen to this guy talk about military history all day. Then again, I could listen to ANYBODY talk about military history all day.
@TheBubba914 жыл бұрын
Same here!!
@frenstcht4 жыл бұрын
The KZbin recommendation algorithm really does kick up some gems now and again.
@AlechiaTheWitch4 жыл бұрын
Same
@Louieepicgamer23 жыл бұрын
No he’s just reacting
@tinameadows4624 жыл бұрын
They didn’t crack the language, they had people that spoke Japanese. What they cracked was actual code that the Japanese used.
@cavscout8883 жыл бұрын
They only cracked bits of the code, and as they couldn't get the entire plan from radio traffic, and had to analyze all the deciphered intercepts. They even had to come up with their own ploy to get the Japanese to basically tell them the target was Midway.
@crankyyankee72903 жыл бұрын
And the US had a code no one cracked, known as the Navaho language(native tribe) speaking code in the Navaho speech, the usual reaction to that(in British English would be "Wot in Ell is 'at?"). Another little problem of Midway for the Japanese was their invasion of the Aleutians, they did take and hold 2 small islands, but while there one Zero was lost on a beach, in relatively good condition, picked up by the US, repaired, studied, and tested, revealing its strengths, and weaknesses improving the tactics of the Wildcats, and later Corsairsa and making the Hellcat even deadlier to Zeroes. As I recall Yamamoto warned the Japanese leaders that in a war, he could run rampant for about 6 months after which things would go badly for Japan-Midway was about 6 months after Pearl Harbor. While being congratulated on his victory Yamamoto said "I fear that all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve", quite the prophet he was, and then a lightning would later strike him down.
@Branderwall20244 жыл бұрын
"The largest uno reverse in military history" would be a better title lol
@sirethanthegreat40694 жыл бұрын
This is underrated.
@hamburgersandfuriousanger68204 жыл бұрын
My grandfather who was a veteran of the Solomon Islands and Saipan we owe our lives to each branch of the military.!Otherwise we’d either be speaking Japanese, German or Russian.
@sirethanthegreat40694 жыл бұрын
@JSENNER83 . Lol XD XD XD
@jameslaverdiere79334 жыл бұрын
The battle of uno
@iamaloafofbread89264 жыл бұрын
@@hamburgersandfuriousanger6820 you would technically be dead or not be born
@weasle29044 жыл бұрын
A lot of the US fighters and strategies were a little outdated this early in the war. Which makes sense, the US was not expecting to enter a world war, while Japan was preparing for years. On top of this Japan was expending all of their most experienced pilots on the front lines (which would later be a mistake as they all died). Later on in the war with the proliferation of the Hellcat, Corsair, and new strategies the US took the advantage. The Hellcat held a 19:1 kill ratio against the Imperial Japanese Navy, completely outclassing the Zero. The Corsair also held a 12:1 loss ratio against the Zero (These are Navy planes, the P51 Mustang also was extremely successful but was an Army Air Force plane and saw most of it's combat in Europe) People praise the few success early on by the Japanese, then ignore the US completely demolishing the Japanese after updating their fleet. This is what contributes to the US mentality of keeping their military constantly updated and more advanced.
@RCXDerp4 жыл бұрын
Makes me want to buy the dodge now haha
@weasle29044 жыл бұрын
@@RCXDerp The Mustang also borrows it's name from the P51 Mustang. I think it's charming to see homage through America's automotive industry to the legendary aviation history in WW2. You'll see this referenced on the Mustang's speedometer "Ground Speed"
@danielhenderson83164 жыл бұрын
Add to the fact that at the beginning of the war, the Japanese also had more experienced pilots, but kept then in the front lines. After Midway, the US would cycle out experienced pilots to train new ones while the Japanese left the best out to die without thinking of how to replace them. Eventually it led to the kamakazi.
@LordMekanicus4 жыл бұрын
Right on point Weasle. All you need do is compare the Wildcat to its successor the Hellcat and you get the picture. We feared the Zero at the start of the war because of how quick and nimble they were compared to ours at the time.
@barnabydodd89564 жыл бұрын
Good info.
@ATownDown324 жыл бұрын
Just so you know midway wasn't the largest naval battle of ww2 , the battle of leyte gulf and the battle of the Philippine sea were much bigger. Also if your interested in naval warfare and want to learn about the greatest ship in US history watch the show "battle 360" . Its a 10 episode documentary about the USS Enterprise CV-6 who fought in almost every major naval battle during ww2.
@maryjoygelizon42684 жыл бұрын
Before ww2 spain and usa wanted phillipines in ww2 japan wanted phillipones and now china wants phillipines,phillipines is very unlucky all the big countrys in asia wants it and theres nothing they can do cause its navy is still ships from ww2 even the planes and tanks and vehicles
@CPny654 жыл бұрын
Battle 360 was a great documentary....Very informative and well made.
@eodyn74 жыл бұрын
@@maryjoygelizon4268 It's strategic positioning to control water ways.
@tristandiaz79494 жыл бұрын
It may have not been the biggest, but Midway was pretty much the turning point in the Pacific
@thelokiway44784 жыл бұрын
@@tristandiaz7949 You are right about the turning point, that WAS the turning point. After Midway the Japanese were turned into a more defensive mindset and the US was attacking when and where they chose.
@certautoserv4 жыл бұрын
The reason for bombing ships is partly because top deck is the least armored part of a ship
@volon54 жыл бұрын
Especially flat top carriers
@rumpleteaser1004 жыл бұрын
In addition, you can't launch and recover aircraft if you are doing evasive maneuvers to avoid the high level bombers. The B-17's may not have scored any hits during the battle but they kept the japanese from launching and recovering aircraft for a crucial amount of time.
@thedeadyoutuberscollector84474 жыл бұрын
As well it is hard to get close with shipe
@ji31944 жыл бұрын
It depends on the design of the carriers, Royal Navy Carriers had heavily armoured flight decks compared to American and Japanese carriers.
@rumpleteaser1004 жыл бұрын
@@ji3194 The planes are on the deck taking off or landing...... they aren't "heavily armored"...
@folcotook30494 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: the Germans had more success closer to the continental US than the Japanese. In the early part of the war, U Boats sank a lot of shipping within sight of the east coast of the United States. The US wasn't blacking out cities which silhouetted ships at night and many US merchant captains refused to participate in convoys thinking they could sneak through on their own.
@user-dc5ti1is1s4 жыл бұрын
US you are being torpedoed constantly you need to do something, "Nah we just gonna ignore it for a while"
@WG554 жыл бұрын
Yes, it was Operation Paukenschlag (Drumbeat). One-fourth of all ships sunk by U-boats were during this single six-month period off of the US east coast and Gulf of Mexico.
@_AKMOMO_4 жыл бұрын
You do know Japan invaded USA right? they invaded and occupied Alaska chain islands (Attu).
@folcotook30494 жыл бұрын
@@_AKMOMO_ as a diversion, yes, though remember at that point Alaska wasn't a state. The German U-Boats did far more significant damage to the war effort than the Japanese did in Alaska.
@user-dc5ti1is1s4 жыл бұрын
@@folcotook3049 I mean main reason they did damage is because the US just decided to ignore the problem and keep New York lit up lmao.
@memesforjjolatunji41554 жыл бұрын
You need to learn about the p51 mustang. It’s such a cool plane with some great history
@mohamedabdulla54144 жыл бұрын
Did thy open up yet?
@justanunluckyirishmaninabl51783 жыл бұрын
Nah, do the p47 thunderbolt instead. It's the a10 warthog of ww2
@nothing-mm8ui3 жыл бұрын
@Yusuf Mohamed Fbi open up! Cia go away. Head of state time and date? Kgb come with me. The ultimate uno reverse
@TheDarkSpecter003 жыл бұрын
The Mustang is a thing of beauty, but I'm still partial to the F4U. Nothing quite like it.
@Mike-hq1xk4 жыл бұрын
shooting at a ship would only injure crewman cause the ships armor is to thick. Bombs are mostly for aircraft carriers because they want to put the flight deck out of commission. They use torpedoes from torpedo bombers to sink ships.
@firghteningtruth71734 жыл бұрын
Also, didnt they store their planes on deck at that time? The bombs blow the planes...annnnnnd useless ship.
@chemislife4 жыл бұрын
@@firghteningtruth7173 no they where below deck where they where re arming their planes. The main reason the Americans used bombs instead of torpedoes is because A)their torpedoes where unreliable due to an unreliable supplier B)the pilots felt more comfortable with bombing
@JiggleWiggleBagel4 жыл бұрын
@@firghteningtruth7173 Depends on the country mostly, the British for example used armorued carriers where the planes were stored in armorued shells below deck coupled with an armoured flight deck it proved difficult to actually knock out British aircraft carriers by damaging the flight deck. IIRC there was an account where a japanese airplane kamikazied one carrier and the flight crw effectively brushed the destroyed aircraft and all the debris off the side of the ship and they were good to launch again
@RTStx14 жыл бұрын
@@chemislife But during midway after it was started and got heavy, the Japanese had their planes on deck loaded with bombs for midway. After learning other air craft carriers were around they went to switch to torps, and were hit at that moment causing the deck and planes to go sky high.
@kevin92184 жыл бұрын
Shooting ships with bullets might damage planes on deck and kill crew members, but the decks, even wooden ones were too tough to really damage significantly with machine guns. Bombs could leave a massive hole in the deck, meaning aircraft can't drive over that area to take off or land. Also bombs could penetrate below deck to hit ammunition storage, fuel, engines etc. Torpedoes were more reliable to sink a ship, but bombing a ship and setting it on fire was just as effective as knocking it out.
@AverytheCubanAmerican4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Midway is home to the world's oldest wild bird, a Laysan albatross named Wisdom. She lives within the world's largest albatross colony.
@hypershock07624 жыл бұрын
Interesting.
@pierrewuranr63994 жыл бұрын
nice fact
@Stealthycessna4 жыл бұрын
I remember a vid or a article I think it was an article for school on that
@obiohaz60234 жыл бұрын
how do they taste?
@michaelsmith-iu1be4 жыл бұрын
On google maps you can visit Midway, which is kinda cool. Nobody there but a bunch of birds.
@mrdetached77204 жыл бұрын
moment of silence for all them brave souls lost
@DarkRipper1174 жыл бұрын
On both sides really....the Japanese naval pride was crushed at Midway...how demoralizing that must've been.
@gdo35104 жыл бұрын
DarkRipper117 you mess with the bull you get the horns
@mekolame4 жыл бұрын
6:03 its a good thing our country (USA) contains so many different backgrounds of cultures, and at this time we still had Japanese Americans that knew the language at the time.
@carloscolon12794 жыл бұрын
True.. still heartbreaking how we treated the Japanese Americans at this time.
@skull11614 жыл бұрын
@@carloscolon1279 better safe than sorry?
@d.johnson99574 жыл бұрын
@@skull1161 Unfortunately true. Some of those Americans could still could have had family in Japan. Not to mention, a lot of immigrants who became citizens didn't do it because they lack loyalty to or love for their home country; they did it out of necessity. It's why you can find places throughout America like Little Italy or Chinatown. People from the same country tend to navigate towards one another and create their own cultural cluster. It reminds them of where they came from and for those who find it difficult to speak English, it gives them a comfortable place where they can communicate easily with people who speak the same language. Anyway, it can end up making them split their loyalty to their old country and their new country which puts them in a very precarious position. So I can understand why it was done. What I don't understand is why our government treated them like criminals and made them live in horrific conditions. They were still Americans and should have been treated with respect and given a proper place to stay. Not pinned up like cattle and treated like animals.
@colincampbell7674 жыл бұрын
@@d.johnson9957 "Some of those Americans could still could have had family in Japan. " Of course people with family in Germany were not treated the same way. Also remember that the reason many of those Japanese people were locked up never because citizens was because there was a law passed that made it very difficult for Japanese immigrants to become citizens. And many of the people who were locked up were born and raised in the US. Trivia note: the reason the Japanese-Americans were interred by the Army was because the the senior managers in the Justice Department threatened to resign en mass if they were told to do it.
@d.johnson99574 жыл бұрын
@@colincampbell767 I didn't know any of this. It's not very often that someone takes the time in a comment to teach me something. Now, I'm eager to do a deeper dive into this to see what other information is out there. Thank you so much for sharing, you just made my day. 😊
@wlfmansbro4 жыл бұрын
The US's torpedoes were terrible. The Japanese had great torpedoes. I think that played a role in the US sending more bombers
@philipgates9884 жыл бұрын
The US developed effective torpedos later in the war. Study Leyte Gulf battles.
@AlechiaTheWitch4 жыл бұрын
There magnetic detectors where thrown of by anomalies and the equator. Which is why they failed
@remingtonwells56384 жыл бұрын
Look up the battle of Leyte Gulf, America made much better torpedoes quickly after Midway.
@PanzerMan3323 жыл бұрын
The topic of the failures of the Mark 14 and Mark 15 torpedoes is a long one, and I particularly recommend Drachinifel's video on it. While yes, the U.S. eventually fielded better torpedoes, there's no excuse for taking several years to fix the problems that could've easily been avoided with proper research and testing in the first place.
@mikelafata16804 жыл бұрын
The Zero was the best fighter in the Pacific until later in the war when the American Hellcat came on the seen. The Hellcat was the far superior plane for the remainder of the war.
@bluelunarwolf29964 жыл бұрын
Actually the F4U corsair was the superior plane in the war during the Pacific theater
@Mason-zp8yb4 жыл бұрын
@@bluelunarwolf2996 The Corsair is truly a thing of beauty.
@Durahan824 жыл бұрын
P47 Thunderbolt & P-38 Lightning : are we Jokes to you ?
@Redspeare4 жыл бұрын
@Hoocher Yep The US Army Air Forces used lots of P-38s and P-47s in the PTO. It was a P-38 pilot who shot down and killed Yamamoto. Also, the highest scoring USMC ace in the PTO, Captain Joe Foss scored all of his victories in an F4F Wildcat. The F4U had a kill to loss ration or 11:1. The F4F Wildcat had a 9:1 ratio, and the F6F Hellcat a 19:1 ratio.
@Redspeare4 жыл бұрын
@@bluelunarwolf2996 "Actually" it was the F6F Hellcat with a 19:1 kill/loss ratio. :)
@REXXltm144 жыл бұрын
you need to learn about the enterprise carrier, the most decorated ship of the war
@lainehuang99544 жыл бұрын
Brooo yas !it was one of the best!
@illegalalien44444 жыл бұрын
@@lainehuang9954 USS Enterprise nicknamed the "Big E"
@badmoth242xl34 жыл бұрын
The one ship that carried the entire US Navy
@billallen47934 жыл бұрын
The Hornet is another great ship that is now a museum....from Wyoming USA 🔫🤠🇺🇸p.s stay safe and healthy everybody GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY AND stop this foolishness ❤
@willdezso11014 жыл бұрын
The Enterprise is the greatest ship of the Pacific war.
@MothMizzle4 жыл бұрын
24:50 - Yorktown damage control was so good the Japanese attacked it a second time thinking it was a different carrier. All the fires were out and the hole in the deck had been patched.
@Dust2104 жыл бұрын
And it wasn't even the Japanese air attacks that sank it, a Japanese submarine stumbled upon her while she was being towed back to Pearl Harbor for repairs and fired 4 torpedoes at her. One missed, two hit the Yorktown, and one hit the destroyer that was alongside her at the time and blew it in half. She still might have survived all of that, but the destroyers depth charges went off and knocked out the auxiliary generator providing power to the repair crews and that was that for the ship which then finally sank, 14 hours later.
@l8tr5974 жыл бұрын
Our damage control and fire suppression was far superior, also had fuel flushing systems to purge fuel lines to prevent the spread, again, unlike the enemy’s carriers.
@weasle29044 жыл бұрын
The US in general has better safety systems in their military across the board
@hunterskidmore16724 жыл бұрын
@@weasle2904 no one likes losing troops after all
@kwek27984 жыл бұрын
Me: *studies for an upcoming exam for 5 hours* “mom im done studying” My asian mom: 13:37
@BH-rm1ch4 жыл бұрын
😂
@Alcivv4 жыл бұрын
Bruh😂😂
@Alcivv4 жыл бұрын
BuT wAS It EnOuGh
@joshstock65914 жыл бұрын
L33t
@QuacksThePoet4 жыл бұрын
😭😭😭😭😭😭
@jessicapope69774 жыл бұрын
I think you need to watch the movie “MIDWAY”, it’s very accurate and more in-depth when it comes to the code breakers, uss enterprise and on the pilots!
@stischer474 жыл бұрын
Watch "Midway" (2019)...very well made. McClusky's decision wasn't "pure luck", he followed a Japanese destroyer hightailing it back to the carriers. The Japanese pilots were considered the best in the Pacific if not the world.
@Seems123454 жыл бұрын
I watched it the day it came out two days before my birthday. Best war film I’ve seen. Since I haven’t seen many. Really good
@Dragonspirit2234 жыл бұрын
Definitely the best war film (Okay, maybe 2nd, Gettysburg remains the top, maybe a tie between the two), as far as I know, historically accurate, didn't add a stupid love story, character development (From what I remember) was good, while they also showed the Japanese, American, and even the Chinese sides (The last I personally have never seen, I knew that it existed, but it was the first time that I can remember it appearing on a big screen. Seems like we Americans seem to forgive the Japanese for the atrocities they committed (I mean, we did the same, not to the same degree, but we've always committed atrocities in war) because we nuked them twice. Just a observation I've seen from school and general media).
@woody40774 жыл бұрын
to be fair he did get "lucky" that a japanese ship was in that location
@stischer474 жыл бұрын
@@woody4077 OK, but in that case just about all battles are decided by "luck"
@woody40774 жыл бұрын
@@stischer47 point conceeded
@cherylann97814 жыл бұрын
You should watch the movie Midway, the70’s version. It’s a pretty good timeline of events.
@raptortime45624 жыл бұрын
I mean the new one is quite good
@cherylann97814 жыл бұрын
Oof Time I agree it’s a good movie, but the 70’s version has a better time line and is easier to follow as far as the actual battle goes.
@chemislife4 жыл бұрын
@@cherylann9781 the problem with the 70s version is it has several inaccuracies in it's time line for instance the planes fueling on the top deck.
@binyominsilverman15924 жыл бұрын
The new one is better.
@michaelusswisconsin60024 жыл бұрын
2019 is also good
@tirasbell47404 жыл бұрын
Hey Artur. History buff here. Bombs were the most effective in taking out enemy ships. The torpedo bombers at the time were outdated, it required pilots to fly low and slow making it easy for anti aircraft to pick them off, plus the torpedoes were plagued with problems primarily the torpedoes fuses not going off. Bombing specifically divebombing was more effective. It had a higher success rate than torpedoes and was in comparison a lot safer. Edit: The TBD Devastator is a torpedo bomber not a dive bomber. The SBD Dauntless was
@AlechiaTheWitch4 жыл бұрын
Magnetic detonators had trouble due to irregularities and beung near the equator
@Ben-zh4nz4 жыл бұрын
I’ve been loving this channel recently, instant sub
@20somthingdrifter114 жыл бұрын
28:48 The Devastator was a torpedo bomber, and it was obsolete before the war started, combined with the fact that American torpedos were very unreliable at this stage, meant the devastator crews had little effect and were cut to pieces.
@shack19434 жыл бұрын
Artur you should check out Mark Felton Productions on KZbin. He has a lot of stuff on World War 2 that I think you would find very interesting.
@thekhans28234 жыл бұрын
@ Shack19 , Oh yes
@casanmacaslang62454 жыл бұрын
I support this...
@TheBruceGday4 жыл бұрын
Shack19 then there is Drachinfel for naval history!
@milagroscuevas11394 жыл бұрын
“We didn’t win, Japan has awoken a sleeping giant..” Admiral Yamamoto after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Thanks for the likes I guess.
@mr.kamikaze86604 жыл бұрын
There’s no evidence he ever actually said that quote, but it’s plausible since he did have that kind of mindset.
@Andrew-ep4kw4 жыл бұрын
@@mr.kamikaze8660 yeah I think he said something to the effect that Japan just awoke a sleeping giant, but I don't know the exact quote. I believe Yamamoto's strategy for Midway was to destroy the US Pacific carrier fleet then negotiate a peace with the United States. He was educated in the US, had seen it's industrial potential and knew Japan would lose a protracted war.
@weasle29044 жыл бұрын
@@Andrew-ep4kw Strange to see a person who calls himself a man study in the US, a country with far more individual freedoms than Japan, then be perfectly okay fighting for the broken and immoral government in Japan... It would be like a North Korean living in the US, then coming back to North Korea and leading the war on the US
@HardenJID4 жыл бұрын
Weasle well it’s very funny you bring up the North Korean example considering there have been North Korean defectors who suffer such a major culture shock and were so “brainwashed” that they actually preferred to go back and some did, now obviously this isn’t every defector or even most but it does happen.
@USS_Grey_Ghost4 жыл бұрын
Said something to the effect of I can give you 1 maybe 2 years of free reign in the Pacific after that I cannot guarantee this
@Navy89SEALs4 жыл бұрын
Early in the war, Japanese technology was superior. Planes could fly faster and turn sharper. Torpedoes almost always worked where ours failed to arm or hit. By the end of the war, our technology had caught up to and surpassed the Japanese. After the war, we silently swore to never allow a potential foe to have superior technology.
@TheCsel4 жыл бұрын
If the Americans actually had functional torpedoes at the start of the war, it all would have turned out very differently.
@JHNielson48514 жыл бұрын
@@TheCsel - The Mark 14 torpedo was junk and the Navy's Bureau of Ordnance was to stubborn to listen to their submarine commanders. The aircraft at Midway use the Mark 13 torpedo but it was also a piece of junk.
@SaltineChips4 жыл бұрын
@@JHNielson4851 I wonder if submarine commanders just simply began to not use then at all.
@Navy89SEALs4 жыл бұрын
@@TheCsel Especially since the Japanese biggest mistake of Pearl Harbor was flying over the submarine base twice without dropping a single bomb. Our subs wrecked their shipping and supplies which kept us in the war. But just imagine if they had working torpedoes.
@bbigjohnson0694 жыл бұрын
@@Navy89SEALs Their torpedoes were good ours weren't.
@knightlife984 жыл бұрын
"We meet at Midway!" "Naval War!"
@ISS6004 жыл бұрын
FAR FROM SHORE, A PACIFIC WAR BOMBS ARE FALLING FROM THE SKY IT'S A BOMB RUN DAY, ITS THE NAVAL WAY A BLOOD RED SUN IS ON THE RISE
@billburch15394 жыл бұрын
the B17's were heavy bombers from midway. you're confusing them with fighters, dive bombers and torpedo bombers that are on carriers.
@yeraymonzon63384 жыл бұрын
Ever heard of B-17 666?
@Andrew-ep4kw4 жыл бұрын
Between Pearl Harbor and Midway (about 6 months apart) a small group of US carriers roamed the Japanese Pacific almost like pirate ships, striking at island bases and disappearing. This was one of the reasons Japan thought up the Midway attack - to deal a death blow to the American carrier fleet that was causing so much trouble
@JaayCeez4 жыл бұрын
Is there a name to search of ra video of them?
@Andrew-ep4kw4 жыл бұрын
@@JaayCeez you can search the battle of midway which will give you a bunch of videos. The two best in my opinion are the one from the Japanese perspective and the Battlefield episode, which goes into depth about the battles that led up to Midway. Here's the link to that video kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z6iWYXmhiL2siqc
@Rammstein0963.4 жыл бұрын
As to bombing ships? It's possible, in fact it's one of the reasons dive bombing was invented, it's easier on fat, slow ships though, such as Battleships and Carriers.
@josephc81254 жыл бұрын
General Joseph here
@arturrehi4 жыл бұрын
Members (Generals) have early access ;) nice
@2halliom4 жыл бұрын
seya hin
@immortalnomad03414 жыл бұрын
"If you don't like that, go away!" This is why I watch and love your videos 😂😂😂
@cartermccauley73524 жыл бұрын
I love how Artur talks about wars and stuff and doesn’t bring up politics it’s better than watching the history channel
@bromixsr4 жыл бұрын
Nowadays, watching paint dry is better than watching the History Channel.
@Rammstein0963.4 жыл бұрын
Btw, Artur, just a heads up.. Idk if you'll see this, but whenever you see the name "Harbaugh" it's generally pronounced "Har-baw"
@captoscarmike95334 жыл бұрын
Or if referring to Coach Jim Harbaugh just say, moron and that should cover it...JK!!!
@jonathanbartron36584 жыл бұрын
@@captoscarmike9533, I was gonna pretty much say the same thing.
@afto71414 жыл бұрын
torpedoes are a better than bombs but its still hard to hit the target.
@nicholaswilson18514 жыл бұрын
Fionn MacEachern not air-dropped torps they’re smaller than the kinds boats use
@tarn11354 жыл бұрын
The USA’s torpedos were temperamental at best. Our detonators work 1/3 of the time. Thankfully our dive bombers worked just fine.
@landonfonke60824 жыл бұрын
Back then, torpedoes were new so they were accident prone
@budmeister4 жыл бұрын
@@landonfonke6082 The first effective self-propelled torpedo came out in 1866.
@Nyx_21424 жыл бұрын
@@tarn1135 No. The Mk. 14 torpedo was a dud 9 times out of 10. 1/3 is way too good for those pieces of junk.
@jamesedwards24834 жыл бұрын
Love Your Channel. You Should React To Taffy 3: The Battle Off Samar. US Destroyers, Destroyer Escorts, And Escort Carriers Against Japanese Battleships, Heavy Cruisers, Light Cruisers And Destroyers.
@TheBruceGday4 жыл бұрын
James Edwards yes! Watch the Odds? What are Those? From Drachinfel. Love his video on Samar! kzbin.info/www/bejne/anLHlKl6nqZmoqc
@CorsetGrace4 жыл бұрын
"The Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors" is the name of the book.
@Embur124 жыл бұрын
The zero was a superior fighter early in the war. US weapons systems like torpedoes, dive bombers, and torpedo bombers were all inferior. The Yorktown was rushed into battle in a few days after sustaining major damage in the battle of corral sea. They patched a huge hole in her deck with plywood, and the Yorky was lost in battle. but it was invaluable to be able to launch the sheer number of aircraft needed to destroy the Japanese carrier fleet.
@Hello-ub8kt4 жыл бұрын
It was terrifying early in the war but superior weapons, including far superior fighters, were developed over the course of the war, and the Japanese couldn’t keep up
@Baldeagle-tw2nv4 жыл бұрын
The Yorktown taking those multiple hits also had the Japanese thinking that they had taken down two American carriers instead of hitting the Yorktown multiple times. Yorktown was a tough gal and took more punishment than a ship should have, she stood firm when her nation and sailors needed her to and the presence of her also confused the Japanese as they thought it was impossible to have the Yorktown back in combat after the massive damage taken at Coral Sea. People also forget that repair teams were still on the ship when she left Pearl Harbor and participated in the battle.
@kevinl24824 жыл бұрын
Yup. The Yorktown was set on fire during the first attack and heavy damage was done. It was hit by 3 bombs and 2 torps I think. The repair crew then patched up the decks and did their damage control stuff and the Yorktown was almost good as new until the second attack, leading the Japanese to think they got 2 carriers, and then got attacked while refueling. Also, instead of only 200 people repair it afte Coral Sea, they had 1400 people repair it. It was estimated that it would take 2 weeks normally to repair it, but Nimitz needed it in 3 days, so they x7 peopled and repaired it in 2 days. They did patch a hole with Plywood, but as the Russians say, "Whatever works, works".
@Ko_Kasumi4 жыл бұрын
@@Hello-ub8kt Not all the US weapons were superior tho, Japanese had better torps pretty much the whole war for both planes and ship based torpedoes. Also Japan had better night sights for most the war which made night engagements extra scary. The biggest difference though was manpower and training ideologies. US Aces became teachers while Japanese Aces fought till they died and never passed on knowledge.
@Registered_Simp4 жыл бұрын
One thing they didn't mention regarding McClusky is that he didn't go just off of pure instinct. The Submarine Nautilus that was a fleet scout had been spotted and was being hunted by the Japanese destroyer Arashi. Arashi had finally called off the hunt after a few hours and was powering back towards the feet at flank speed, giving off an enormous wake. McClucky was betting that if he pointed his group in the general direction of this destroyer moving at flank speed, it would take him to the carriers
@mljrotag63432 жыл бұрын
Exactly right.
@mickey34544 жыл бұрын
I would highly suggest watching the movie "Midway" one came out in 2019 and in 1976. Watch either, but great story telling and explains all this in great action and detail. One of my favorite movies.
@adamplez24984 жыл бұрын
The Soviet Union's war industry couldn't have been successful without massive lend lease act. America provided tons of ammunition, provided the Soviets fuel for trucks and high octane aviation fuel, an entire military communications network with tens of thousands of radios, provided train tracks and railcars along with hundreds of thousands of trucks that provided the Soviets the ability to bring massive aid quickly to the fronts(apposed to the germans that relied on horses) and these trucks were also used to mount the feared soviet katyusha rocket system as well as pull towed artillery, these trucks also allowed them to out run the Germans and out supply them. The US help provide winter clothing as well as food to the Soviets (the germans were eating their own boots near the wars end). along with tanks and planes. for anyone questioning this, look at Stalins and Gorbachev's own memoirs on this, they essentially said the war on the Eastern front would have been lost without American and Western aid. do a video on this!
@alreadyblack33414 жыл бұрын
Not to mention, the Industrial Aid given to the Soviets pre-war. American contractors helped construct and design Soviet Factories, and these templates were copy and pasted essentially with the Industrial buildup of the Soviet's Central Asian sector.
@alextjb4 жыл бұрын
You have to give the soviets credit for literally disassembling their factories in the west from Moscow and other cities and putting them on trains and rebuilding them in the East. It is an amazing feat of engineering to literally rebuild entire factories in just a few weeks. Without those factories the Russians have no tanks, rifles, ammunition, aircraft, etc etc.
@l8tr5974 жыл бұрын
We gave them the Hearth Furnace technology inducing oxygen to make quality steel, which their t34s would have sucked without. Speaking of that, they also used Christie’s design (American from France) to make the T34s also, after our government turned the best tank design of the war down. Russia then, is like now, a paper tiger.
@casanmacaslang62454 жыл бұрын
Is there any good videos about this info
@alreadyblack33414 жыл бұрын
@@l8tr597 Well, their Armored core is dated and deteriorating, and they just don't have the economic or industrial capacity to withstand a major conflict against China, the U.S., or the E.U.
@NoobNoobNews4 жыл бұрын
Artur, drink black tea with a little sugar instead of energy drink when tired.
@aidenhuang71064 жыл бұрын
“If you don’t like history... go away” 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@kie-skatemods41414 жыл бұрын
Ki Muas here from San Francisco, I’m a US Marine Veteran. Thanks for giving some good different perspective for my country’s history
@elexanderbauson4 жыл бұрын
So they used 3 Yorktown Class carriers to counter Akagi,Kaga,Hiryu,and Shoryu oh I love history
@kickofftheboot4 жыл бұрын
That dude doesn’t look like he should have that voice.
@AlechiaTheWitch4 жыл бұрын
I know right
@huntclanhunt96974 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: the son of the American President Franklin Roosevelt served on an anti aircraft gun on the island.
@solarios99833 жыл бұрын
wow
@manictiger3 жыл бұрын
FDR: Hold my Pina Colada
@Tommyturbo19814 жыл бұрын
YOU NEED TO WATCH "BATTLE 360." Its the entire naval battle during ww2.
@h3S3zl4 жыл бұрын
Where do you watch this
@TheStig_TG4 жыл бұрын
Unforgiving 28 Tv
@jndvs954 жыл бұрын
As a former U.S. soldier, I cannot state enough how much I appreciate your videos and motivation to study history. It is bittersweet to see a foreign national show so much more respect to American history and history in general than many current Americans, but I enjoy it all the more for that. The world would have much to learn from seeing fellow soldiers of different nations interact when together. Race doesnt matter, nationality doesn't matter. It's everyone understanding and respecting each other for what they were and are. Perhaps that is what made the previous generation the "greatest generation." They had first hand experience that there are regular people everywhere with their own lives and problems. This has been evident in almost every major war as allies mingled. Videos like yours bring that to the public and bring a little bit more people in. Thank you. If you haven't yet. I recommend you find a video on the Red Tail squadron. There was a popular movie made about them, but they earned it.
@Guildelin4 жыл бұрын
One "battle" I'm really impressed by is when we took down Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto ... Less of a battle and more of an assassination but still very impressive build up
@james-io9nj4 жыл бұрын
There’s a great movie about this battle called “Midway” that is amazing and I highly recommend.
@potatojuice51244 жыл бұрын
Maybe next the battle off Samar next. It’s even more epic! Even if it wasn’t as important
@pikamonketchumlol12374 жыл бұрын
As a Filipino I am kinda offended, but the Battle of Leyte Gulf was the biggest naval war, if you haven't Artur please react to it!
@dustypluskrat74234 жыл бұрын
PikamonKetchumlol 123 definitely Leyte Gulf for the absolute mad lads in Taffy-3 a true David and Goliath story.
@pikamonketchumlol12374 жыл бұрын
@@dustypluskrat7423 we all know what happens after that, Japan surrenders and pays its debt with its anime
@TheCsel4 жыл бұрын
In what should have been the most spectacular battleship engagement of the war, instead it was the main Japanese battlefleet against a few American support carriers and destroyers. And the Americans win.
@TheBruceGday4 жыл бұрын
POTATO JUICE yes! Watch the Odds? What are Those? From Drachinfel. Love his video on Samar! kzbin.info/www/bejne/anLHlKl6nqZmoqc
@whiphid437Official4 жыл бұрын
I was a boyscout in the USA and my troop spent two nights in the Yorktowns barracks. It it in a permanent cement anchor off our east coast and we snuck away in the night and crawled around a bunch of parts of the ship that we weren't getting to see otherwise. Very fun very special memory.
@michaelriddick71164 жыл бұрын
The 1976 movie "Midway" is outstanding, you should watch it :) Also: the Battle of Coral (May '42) sea was the first time the Imperial Japanese navy failed to win. It was a draw and set the stage for Midway (June '42)
@Pasakid4 жыл бұрын
React to Taistelukenttä 2020. It's how Finland would go to war if it comes.
@basketcase2894 жыл бұрын
The US didnt really have a fighter advantage until a bit later in the war when through a combination of developing specialized tactics to deal with the Zeros, attrition leaving the Japanese navy with few experienced pilots, and eventually superior designed fighters they eventually gained the advantage probably culminating in "The Great Marianas Turkey Shoot"
@airsoftpopcorn4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, US fighters were a lot tougher and more resilient than japanese planes, but this meant they were less maneuverable. Especially earlier on in the war
@terrypennington25194 жыл бұрын
I think when the US had started using Hellcats they finally had a chance at dogfighting zeros, wildcats weren't very effective against them because US planes were designed to be much tougher at the cost of their maneuverability
@redshirt51264 жыл бұрын
Here's a link to a video that does a great job of explaining the advantages vs the disadvantages of the Japanese Mitsubishi Zero during the Pacific campaign. kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6Gyl5WupbFnesk
@TheCsel4 жыл бұрын
Zeroes were good, but the Japanese never produced a great upgrade for them. Their design teams were working with too many constraints and as the war progressed their industry took hits. The Americans and British were able to field newer aircraft and they quickly outclassed the older Zeroes.
@redshirt51264 жыл бұрын
@@TheCsel It probably didnt help that the Zero had to be an extreamly balance airframe in terms of weight to get the best preformance out of it. Because of that, when the Japanese Navy started looking at adding upgrades, they found that anything they added would make the Zero overweight and unstable.
@kryfriecookie78554 жыл бұрын
Imagine if he saw Girls und panzer tank drifting
@Durahan824 жыл бұрын
25:15 The Wildcats were obsolete against the Zeros but after the Newer Hellcats , Thunderbolts and Lightnings came later in the war , the Zeros had no chance .
@sgtpickles13194 жыл бұрын
Please react to the Iowa-Class battleships, arguably the strongest warships of WWII. Served all the way until the 1990's
@tediz_ftw22404 жыл бұрын
Or the Yamato-class battleship which is the heaviest battleship ever made.
@prodigalespace72994 жыл бұрын
Spaceman here :)
@arturrehi4 жыл бұрын
Hello General
@prodigalespace72994 жыл бұрын
@@arturrehi hello sir!
@comunistpig95004 жыл бұрын
Hello Sir @Artur Rehi
@comunistpig95004 жыл бұрын
@@SuperBobblehead77 no
@comunistpig95004 жыл бұрын
@@arturrehi Hello sir!
@Patsy_Parisi4 жыл бұрын
Arthur: You are forgetting that Japan had access to a remarkable amount of resources. They had access to rubber from Malaya, oil from Indonesia, and steel from other conquered nations.
@TheMyrmo4 жыл бұрын
Why bombers? Because they had bombers. Ideally against enemy ships of this era you would torpedo planes, but this whole thing went down pretty swiftly.
@stischer474 жыл бұрын
But at the time US torpedos had lousy reliability. The best were dive bombers. Which took out the carriers.
@mikek01354 жыл бұрын
The American torpedo reliability wasn’t bad enough that it would cause them to choose bombers instead. In this case they sent bombers because they sent everything they had (except fighters).
@douglascampbell98094 жыл бұрын
@@mikek0135 American torpedo reliability was horrible at the start of the war. In mid-1943 an analysis of 105 Mark 13 torpedoes dropped at speeds in excess of 150 knots showed clearly why aviators distrusted the Mark 13: 36 percent ran cold, 20 percent sank, 20 percent had poor deflection performance, 18 percent gave unsatisfactory depth performance, 2 percent ran on the surface, and only 31 percent gave a satisfactory run. You had to fly low and slow to make them work. Pretty much making sure AA takes out your aircraft.
@stischer474 жыл бұрын
@@mikek0135 I agree. They used what they had. But it was the dive bombers not the torpedo bombers that caused the damage, plus luck of the CAP leaving the carriers unprotected from high level bombing.
@warbacca10174 жыл бұрын
A small but crucial detail that one of my college history professors pointed out. Bear in mind that after the order given at 19:11 the decks of the Japanese carriers were covered, not only with planes, but bombs, torpedoes, and fuel lines. A perfect recipe for a battle disaster
@gorbaggoescamping13294 жыл бұрын
"Wind Talkers." Look into them!
@tyhen82114 жыл бұрын
Good one
@Utoober7294 жыл бұрын
Navajo code talkers
@Patriotusa444 жыл бұрын
Don't forget the Choctaw code talkers from WWI.
@OpRaven-624 жыл бұрын
Small correction Artur: the British cracked the Enigma machine. The mathematician named "Alan Turing", along with his team, learned of a key word for the machines. The Germans became lazy, and overconfident in their coded devices, that they used the same code word. With this information, Alan created a computer to check all of the possibilities, until they got one single option. They compared this option to the weather report for the day (because the Germans would send a weather report out every day to let the commanders make sure their codes were ok), and checked to see if the message made sense. In this way, Alan, along with his team, cracked the Enigma. However, at the start of the war, the Polish did crack the code, but only for a few months. The Germans changed the scramble sets, completley changing the configuration for the code. The main difference, is that the Polish sort of made it obvious that they were in the code, the British tried to keep it as secret as possible, selectively choosing which attacks to prevent, and which attacks to let happen.
@thekhans28234 жыл бұрын
@ CommentControl , Yeah they should have changed it 3 times a day
@ALRIGHTYTHEN.4 жыл бұрын
You mean the Poles.
@thekhans28234 жыл бұрын
@ ALRIGHTY THEN , it was the poles you fool !
@mncharlie84554 жыл бұрын
You might check this out. Without the help of the Poles, Turing would not have cracked the final version the Germans were using then. www.warhistoryonline.com/featured/polish-mathematicians-role-in-cracking-germans-wwii-codesystem.html
@finnishintel32354 жыл бұрын
Whereeee is taistelukenttääääää 2020
@potatojuice51244 жыл бұрын
I watched that and it’s very cool!
@ssilent82024 жыл бұрын
I wished they had gone more into detail about the intelligence and counter-intelligence parts of it. I’m pretty sure there is more to it than what was said.
@tchoupitoulos4 жыл бұрын
This whole production was a very general overview, that misses a lot of detail.
@sophiaschier-hanson41634 жыл бұрын
I'm just amazed that there exists such clear colour footage of the Japanese attack on Midway. That was pretty damn cool. I've seen WWII-era colour footage before but colour combat footage is a little rarer as far as I know.
@richardschwarzbauer2013 жыл бұрын
I love this man’s videos.
@chaoticarcher90884 жыл бұрын
react to the swedish metal band "sabaton-bismarck".
@Firusdhf4 жыл бұрын
Power metal sucks
@collincaperton67184 жыл бұрын
@@Firusdhf I prefer heavy metal to power but sabaton is a good example of a powermeral band
@Firusdhf4 жыл бұрын
Collin Caperton I like extremely metal like thrash, death and black
@ahkillease43244 жыл бұрын
“Countries with resources will win.” This is very true. One of the big advantages Rome had over other powers in the ancient world was the fact that it was a vast empire with a vast amount of resources and good logistics. The Roman Empire had a great military, but they absolutely did not win every battle. The Empire had great resilience that made up for some of their defeats.
@l8tr5974 жыл бұрын
Their Roads had a lot to do with it also, agreed, logistics worked
@ahkillease43244 жыл бұрын
l8tr597 And many of said roads were built whilst on campaign
@JSp4wN4 жыл бұрын
Artur, You should watch the movie "midway". You wont regret it.
@TheDarkSpecter003 жыл бұрын
I really like the newest one, despite the critics review.. The 1976 one is alright, but a lot of added drama. Haven't seen the other one.
@NathanWilkie4 жыл бұрын
"Prisoners of Geography" is a great follow up book to put a finer point on how resources matter and how geography constrains the behaviors of nation states.
@stevem26013 жыл бұрын
By the way - your interest in American things is awesome. I congratulate you, our Estonian ally!!
@Alex-xd7fr4 жыл бұрын
You should watch ww2 from space it covers everything but it's like an 1 hour to 1 hour and 30 min.
@themoviedealers4 жыл бұрын
"Japan Attacked America, which nobody else had done before..." I thought you did a video on the War of 1812, where England attacked America.
@IrishBiteGirl4 жыл бұрын
To be fair, the USA was barely even a nation of its own at that point, a few decades. That's like attacking a baby as an adult then when he is older trying to say you were the first to ever beat that man up. Even though he wasn't a man yet, just a baby.
@leelendmccormick35384 жыл бұрын
But the British didn’t fight the fighters wer te world’s unsung heroes the Canadians
@rlmurray894 жыл бұрын
At the time, the US bombers were older tech, and they were effectively sitting ducks.
@jimmyjammgrijalva78474 жыл бұрын
Hello my friend, nice reaction to this famous battle of Midway, it was the turning point of the war that we gained the advantage of beating the Japanese, which setup the next history making attack on mainland Japan. You must look at what the US was doing now from that point when they decided to build Fat Man and Little Boy during the Manhattan project and drop the only 2 Atomic bombs in battle by the B29 Bombers Enola Gay and Bockscar to end World War II. It is an amazing story.. By the way I am from Texas as well..
@Jeeeter4 жыл бұрын
There's another great video of the battle of midway made by the youtube channel Montemayor. His video is told by the japanese perspective, it's a great video I highly recommend.
@personmanman30714 жыл бұрын
Japanese carrier go bye-bye
@MrEd-qg8td4 жыл бұрын
Yorktown sunk by Japanese submarine night after battle, couple of months later US carrier go bye bye USS Wasp, USS Saratoga badly damaged by by Sub and Enterprise damaged and had to return to Pearl Harbor for 2 months reapair work. Battle of Santa Cruz October 1942 Enterprise returns to battle and Hornet sunk, Enterprise badly damaged again and nearly sunk. After that we had basically no battle ready carriers. But Japan lost most of it's trained pilots. But Essex launched December 1942 and relieved Enterprise. Now Japan was in bad shape and could not recover. It was basically over for them.
@leevionpro4 жыл бұрын
React to taistelukenttä 2020 please artur
@jsl151850b4 жыл бұрын
Would war be impossible if each side had total intelligence of the adversaries position? No 'Fog of War' at all?
@jsl151850b4 жыл бұрын
Ohhhh. As long as the adversaries had comparable military resources it would be a stalemate. If one side had an overwhelming advantage they could lose equal quantities until one side ran out.
@MDKMRMATT4 жыл бұрын
@@jsl151850b i would say yes still possible because like watching a boxing match between two equal fighters they would maneuver for position until there is an advantage and unlike boxing for sport two people fighting to the death one may take an intentional non critical blow to score a fatal hit like Ali in boxing with a rope a dope
@Baldeagle-tw2nv4 жыл бұрын
Also all the intel in the world cannot account for individual action. That was what set the American forces apart from every other force in WWII, the sheer unpredictability of American forces made it difficult to handle them. The Germans knew the Americans would fight tooth and nail, but didn't know HOW they would fight. There was no set American dogma of action and the Germans made comment of it several times. They knew how the Commonwealth forces would act and had a general idea of how the Soviets would fight, but they couldn't figure out for the love of God how the Americans were going to act. When your military is made up of wildcards that constantly change tactics and plans on the fly all the intel in the world is rendered pointless.
@jsl151850b4 жыл бұрын
@@Baldeagle-tw2nv Thanks everyone for your replies. I don't know who else I could have asked. B1787 ...I wasn't saying foreknowledge, just impossible transparency. Magical cameraless television. "Know-Ware".
@CrimsonThunderSB4 жыл бұрын
20:28 yes, the Japanese Zeros were good, however they did have some serious flaws in its design that was later exploited later on, and when the F4U Corsair and the F6F Hellcat (which was basically a much improved Wildcat), they literally lost all the advantage they had. First off, the Zero had a floater carburetor that when inverted would temporarily starve the engine of fuel when inverted, 2nd the frame was so light that if they were too fast, they wouldn't be able to maneuver at all. Corsair and Hellcat pilots would be trained to dive away from them at a disadvantage, and they were trained to only use boom and zoom tactics, and never to get into a slow turning fight against a Zero.
@Lechuga18153 жыл бұрын
"They had attacked America which no Nation had done before" *Great Britain*: "Am I a joke to you?"
@johannesvalterdivizzini1523 Жыл бұрын
My uncle Tom Reale was a B24 pilot who was posthumously decorated. Flying over the Pacific, his plane was hit by flack and caught on fire. He held it steady as most of the crew bailed out. He was literally burning up, but his job was to hold it steady. He saved the lives of six crew members before the flames caused the plane to blow up. I never knew him and there was no trace of his body. If you asked him if he was a hero, I know he would have said no; he died just doing his duty.
@walletgamer78964 жыл бұрын
I agree that you should learn more about The Grey Ghost but something that shouldn't be overlooked either was Yorktown's participation in this battle. They said it would take 2 weeks to repair her but she left dock after only 48 hours and went ahead to contribute to the battle heavily
@royweyant43824 жыл бұрын
Love your Channel. One little known fact that gave the American carriers an advantage in fire fighting was that the tanks holding aviation fuel were topped off with nitrogen gas as they used the fuel. That aided the carriers survival.
@alexwerkmeister86254 жыл бұрын
At 22:30, what really happened was they spotted a Japanese Destroyer that earlier broke off to chase a U.S. Sub.arine that earlier launched torpedoes at the Carriers. When they broke off the search and headed back to the Carrier group, McCluskey spotted this ship and followed him, just minutes after they reached the turn around point
@sirethanthegreat40694 жыл бұрын
I think the best answer to naval combat at the time is yes, using planes to shoot and also during the time dive bombing. You can also do ship to ship battles. That’s what I think. But your answer was good too.
@EdgewiseSJ4 жыл бұрын
In response to your question asked at 10:11 When the B-17 was conceived, targeting ships was one of the ideas for it, but it never successfully hit a ship that was moving afaik, only ships sitting still. Partly because when it was first designed, fighters were much slower and anti-aircraft guns were very poor, so the idea was it could attack from much lower altitude. Carriers and carrier fighters were still very basic just a few years before WW2 happened.
@conamer67384 жыл бұрын
Search for "Montemayor" The Battle of Midway: The Aerican Perspective, The Japanese Perspective and Hiryu's Counterstrike. This is the most precise single source on the Battle of Midway. I have been a military history buff since I was a child and I am a 56 years old U.S. Army veteran.
@kylefam93564 жыл бұрын
Watch the movie called "Midway" it came out in 2019 and is a really good and informational movie.
@Nidhoggrr4 жыл бұрын
Bombing back then was extremely inaccurate. However ships have very thin armor on their decking which means the best way to do heavy damage is to try and get a bomb to land on the deck.
@thegreyghost58464 жыл бұрын
10:20 yes bombing a ship is a very good option, as it has the least armor and has holes cut in it for the funnels, but not how the Americans were doing it at first. High level strategic bombers like the b-17 are probably the single worst type of plane to attack a fleet for several reasons: 1. Its moving. This isn't like bombing a moving convoy (on a road), a lot of the times that convoy will be limited to that road. Meanwhile not only does a ship move relatively quickly, but they can also turn freely in just about any direction. 2. Elevation. The high elevation not only means that your bombs will inherently be less accurate, but it also means they have a longer distance to fall so they spend more time in the air, which means your enemy has a large window for evasive maneuvers.
@Galaar4 жыл бұрын
As referenced around 10:15 bombers are the way to go with attacking a ship if you don't want a surface battle because of the punch they can pack. Maybe for some of the ships of the time incendiary ammo would have been concerning, being wood-topped, but fighters would be little more than an annoyance to them. To this day sailors are trained in firefighting and damage control before they are taught their primary job upon enlisting, the Yorktown served as proof of their skill at the time.
@anthonyusselman94632 жыл бұрын
i know what truly happened, the American ships were late for the battle and didn’t launch their fighters from the carriers until later. 13:05 plus this battle was on the show “Battle 360.”
@hawkmoon4194 жыл бұрын
At least one error in that video: The Douglas TBD Devastator was a TORPEDO bomber, not a dive bomber, and entering service in 1937, was slow and obsolete. Midway was its last major action (but the first for its replacement, the Grumman TBF/General Motors TBM Avenger). The Boeing B-17Es that sortied against the Japanese fleet bombed from high altitude with no hits, while the Martin B-26s closest thing to a hit was when one that was going down almost hit Akagi's bridge. The Mitsubishi A6M 'Zero, Zeke' was fast and highly maneuverable but at the expense of self-sealing fuel tanks and pilot armor while the Grumman F4F/General Motors FM Wildcat was better armed and better armored. Navy personnel used to refer to the manufacturer as 'Grumman Iron Works'. Keep up the videos!
@grassulus1584 жыл бұрын
Rehi, I recommend that you watch a series on Amazon called “Battle 360”
@zackmarkham42404 жыл бұрын
@ 23:21 the analogy you were looking for is "Domino Effect", one thing sets off another, which sets off another, and another, on and on until nothing is left. The analogy 'Time Bomb' is something bad waiting to happen. 'Only a matter of time before it explodes'.