AsteronX Has a Bone to Pick With Safe Science - AsteronX Podcast Ep2

  Рет қаралды 1,065

AsteronX

AsteronX

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 43
@TheAzachiel
@TheAzachiel 4 жыл бұрын
Love you both, world need more people like you. Thanks. I'm signing up for Aeroponics bay on your ship.
@Allucardsin
@Allucardsin 4 жыл бұрын
It's not just the peer review system that's broken it's the educational institutions they need to upgrade their methods. I am a entrepreneur that has been watching you guys for awhile. I like the ideas you have and that you want to challenge and find the truth to take us to the next level to be interstellar. I love science , technology, business and really want to help save humanity and all life as we know it. For awhile now I've been researching and trying to find my own truths in a lot of the ideas I have or ideas I feel fit and could work. Now I don't mind being corrected I want to grow as much and as fast as possible.
@j.heseklon5168
@j.heseklon5168 4 жыл бұрын
Well said. Innovation is how we got to the moon and elsewhere. Two thumbs up!
@dillonzhang978
@dillonzhang978 4 жыл бұрын
Very good points. Also w/regards to "stagnation" among ever civilization: the politics of "what can the government give me," versus "what great ambitions do I have to share with everyone as a key investment."
@nil981
@nil981 4 жыл бұрын
Innovation is strictly tied to profitability.
@asteronx
@asteronx 4 жыл бұрын
@@nil981 Your statement is incorrect. There are thousands of innovative ventures that are not tired to profits.
@asteronx
@asteronx 4 жыл бұрын
Actually, there are many examples where folks became more productive than before. The key here: a complete restructuring. It is better to provide individuals with the necessary skill for personal survival.
@nil981
@nil981 4 жыл бұрын
@@asteronx maybe but like it or not if profits cannot be extracted from innovation then those innovations won't become as widespread as most of us would like it to be.
@singularitysquaredllc.895
@singularitysquaredllc.895 4 жыл бұрын
An apples versus oranges, false conflation. You're attempting to impose political personal anecdotes on a set of facts and data which actually deconstruct your argument: open source as first pass logic, low hanging fruit in that regard.
@Theodorus5
@Theodorus5 4 жыл бұрын
"Underwater basket weaving".. lol my old chemistry teacher used to say that :)
@AngelHernandez-yj8tj
@AngelHernandez-yj8tj 3 жыл бұрын
So Physics and Science we learn in school are simply a history of science and Physics. The newest thing is yet to come. Thank you both for calling out the science community, people like you will take us to the future.
@korky-7349
@korky-7349 4 жыл бұрын
Love it. Asteron x , you are just excellent!
@biancabonet
@biancabonet 4 жыл бұрын
Never stop innovation 😁
@singularitysquaredllc.895
@singularitysquaredllc.895 4 жыл бұрын
As a card carrying heretic, I applaud your spirit.
@nil981
@nil981 4 жыл бұрын
By the way, the civilization energy scale asteronx is referring to is the kardachev scale.
@masonman_2113
@masonman_2113 4 жыл бұрын
The guy who wants to be a starship crew member better look out for the impostors!
@jesseroberson4678
@jesseroberson4678 3 жыл бұрын
Thoughts on the Electric and Plasma Universe models?
@masonman_2113
@masonman_2113 4 жыл бұрын
Your joke about atomic theory and the guy sitting on the atomic bomb really cracked me up :)
@Cyborous
@Cyborous 2 жыл бұрын
14:44 Exactly brilliantly said
@Cyborous
@Cyborous 2 жыл бұрын
1:58 Exactly there are no shortcuts
@OriginalManakin
@OriginalManakin 4 жыл бұрын
Chapter 8: Black Holes; Spatial Collapse Since I have theorized that matter is simply space wrapped into spheres of space, I would continue by arguing that inside a black hole, at a certain depth, matter ceases to be matter at all and just collapsed and extremely compressed space as the spheres of space, under great pressure, (a depth at which the gaps between particulate comes to zero) would shrink in size though increase in surface volume thus producing less of an output of various forms of electromagnetic radiance (like gravity) and then at some depth, which I coin the “Bursting Shell”, pop ( thus producing large bursts of radiation as large groups of particles at some depth pop but only breaking the surface in the case of the more massive black holes due to the fact that the ratio of thickness of “Crust” and “Mantle” to “Core” increases leaning towards the “Core” being more voluminous as the black hole increases in overall mass and so the “Bursting Shell” increasing in mass thus at some scale producing enough energy and thrust as to actually emit from the surface of the black hole). This entire process creating a depth near center of very dense space that is increasingly more frozen in kinetic movement and thus physio time (potentially even linear time and I would be so brave in stating the small possibility that even histrionic time as well is lessened at a gradient to a state at which it is frozen) and since the space is non spherical and not grinding against other space at the speed at which particulate do and not spinning at such a massive speed, would near closer to a state of zero output of various functional orders of magnitude of types of radiation including and especially gravity. Thus, at some point just past the “Bursting Shell” and to the center of the black hole there would be a “ veritable frozen state of physics” at a gradient from the surface to center of the “Core” thus breaking away from Einstein's equations as well as General Relativity. Also I would state that the collapsed space at the “Core” does not have any form of bondage as there is no electromagnetic cling and therefore held in place by the extreme pressure of the external shell or what I would call the Black Holes “Crust” and the “Mantle” as well. Again, the depth at which the Matter begins to shrink in size but not overall volume would be called the “Mantle and the depth at which particle destruction occurs would be called the “Core”. Though I would summarize that I am focusing on gravity, space and time and therefore only a small amount of the function and that the equations in my head would be very hard for me to write on paper since I do math as a holographic representation using my consciousness in a form that I call “Thing Itself Mathematics” thus being very hard for me to translate. The rest I leave to the physicists with a background in standard mathematics. -Azareth Xephraos
@biancabonet
@biancabonet 4 жыл бұрын
The middle ages were a set back in humanity's evolution.
@asteronx
@asteronx 4 жыл бұрын
Yes and no, many technologies continued advancing regardless.
@biancabonet
@biancabonet 4 жыл бұрын
@@asteronx Yes. Evolution still enacts...
@denarkyshio
@denarkyshio 4 жыл бұрын
Strong nuclear force as a waveform to emit a recording to simulate a gravitational singularity then provide directional thrust from inside the synthetic singularity for space folding? Mabey?
@Allucardsin
@Allucardsin 4 жыл бұрын
Now with that being said I want to know how much capital and resources you will need to get it done in 5 years instead of 50? I know it's not easy but how much would it take to do it in that timeline. The same effort that went into the atom bomb I'm speculating and could be very wrong but can you answer that question. All I got was you guys needed some millions but no specific number haha
@biancabonet
@biancabonet 4 жыл бұрын
Climates/weather/atmospheres go through changes and phases over millennia; but, I believe the latest is probably human impact.
@asteronx
@asteronx 4 жыл бұрын
The Earth does go through phases, we already know this well. But this knowledge does not negate human impact on Earth. To say that we have absolutely no influence on Earth is silly.
@biancabonet
@biancabonet 4 жыл бұрын
@@asteronx Maybe the human is a tool/tech.
@singularitysquaredllc.895
@singularitysquaredllc.895 4 жыл бұрын
I suggest "Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes" and the work of Sergey Pulinets, in general, as to an insight on the relative impacts of humans versus other causes, heat contained in the atmosphere, by H2O, say... for an instance.
@Cyborous
@Cyborous 2 жыл бұрын
39:37 amen to that
@jesseroberson4678
@jesseroberson4678 3 жыл бұрын
The pot calling the kettle black.
@lorenzo9934
@lorenzo9934 4 жыл бұрын
☺️☺️☺️
@korky-7349
@korky-7349 4 жыл бұрын
Who is your guest again ?
@danilorainone406
@danilorainone406 4 жыл бұрын
innovation begins with the 2 year old tied to the crib in his own recently painted room,unties the knot in dads old tie,out to the hallway down the stairs bankie in his mouth, before mom or the dog barks aYOU get back here you little,,, mom laughing all the way, psych screening and eval at FTL industries LLC ,after passing the math physics and reasoning tests 'were you a crib jumper??'
@jasonarcand1871
@jasonarcand1871 2 жыл бұрын
I believe science and engineering have become a sacred priest hood of a sorts look at Josiah zainer he worked for nasa for years left to pursue knowledge his own way and found crispr cas 9 he took it a step further said to himself why can't everyone have access to this knowledge he argued why should a person spend thousands of dollars at a institution just to get a peice of paper saying what he is qualified to do or not do why can't a person just pick up a book go online learn on there own get the tools and get there hands dirty he had the guts to say hey im gonna teach average people how to genetic engineer with crispr and the whole world acted like he just started a cult movement of mad scientist he even promoted self human experimentation and all of sudden the scientific community started a witch hunt
@nil981
@nil981 4 жыл бұрын
Innovation at what cost tho? Innovation might have some unintended consequences that could sink it's appeal forever.
@asteronx
@asteronx 4 жыл бұрын
You are referring to the method of operation by the status quo--current conditions. A lack of innovation is stagnation. There are better ways. Elon has already, to some degree, opened the door into another world. Japan has, to some degree, managed to pull up and out--another example, and there is more ...
@masonman_2113
@masonman_2113 4 жыл бұрын
I bet Patrick Milewski was the one who disliked I’m sorry if I was incorrect
@singularitysquaredllc.895
@singularitysquaredllc.895 4 жыл бұрын
What B.S.... over emote much? Define innovation, as I don't think you actually know what it really is.
@nil981
@nil981 4 жыл бұрын
@@singularitysquaredllc.895 I know what innovation is. And no, i did not dislike the video. AsteronX is a pretty damn good inspiration for me to look beyond what modern science says.
@singularitysquaredllc.895
@singularitysquaredllc.895 4 жыл бұрын
@@nil981am interested in what drove your question, and drives such a perspective; and considered mine, a way to get a "between the lines" answer. I'm glad AsteronX is focused on FTL again.
Fundamentals: Ten Keys to Reality | A Conversation with Nobel Laureate Frank Wilczek
2:03:41
Trapped by the Machine, Saved by Kind Strangers! #shorts
00:21
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 40 МЛН
Perfect Pitch Challenge? Easy! 🎤😎| Free Fire Official
00:13
Garena Free Fire Global
Рет қаралды 92 МЛН
How Science Proves God! w/ John Bergsma
3:40:57
Matt Fradd
Рет қаралды 605 М.
Lightspeed Drive
28:45
AsteronX
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Math for Game Devs [2022, part 1] • Numbers, Vectors & Dot Product
3:57:35
Eric Weinstein - Are We On The Brink Of A Revolution? (4K)
3:29:15
Chris Williamson
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
4 Hours Of Science Facts About Our Universe To Fall Asleep To
3:47:14
Progress - Science Documentaries
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Placebos and Behaviour Change - Rory Sutherland
1:57:58
The Weekend University
Рет қаралды 102 М.
Marvin Minsky
1:33:35
InfiniteHistoryProject MIT
Рет қаралды 875 М.
Trapped by the Machine, Saved by Kind Strangers! #shorts
00:21
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 40 МЛН