Please Subscribe 🙏🏻 New Bradley Fighting Vehicle :kzbin.info/www/bejne/nX-rn3ZuZrBqe6Msi=9g-U3tILj4HDBk_d
@Ultra_Ego_Putin7 ай бұрын
Captain Iskander dominates, your stuff is jet target
@professor_of_logic5 ай бұрын
Could you please explain ATACMS to us, on a single example, i don't know something like: "Civilians on the Beach - how to be as efficient as possible with cluster amunition"?! Or something like that...I'm just asking for a Friend.
@Gryffoon5 ай бұрын
ATACMS is a ballistic missile Kh 101 is a cruise missile that has to be subsonic you are comparing the uncaparable, you should have compared ATACMS to Iskander ballistic missile.
@mattkelly20047 ай бұрын
That was about the cleanest and fastest explanation of newtons third law (thrust) I have ever heard. Simple yet dead ringer. Great video
@Derederi6 ай бұрын
I like how Aitelly admits he is a dumb american by not converting to km or cm any more. Last time he did it, he failed at what a 6 year old can do. I genuenly hope aiTelly chokes on the money of 10 ads per 5 minutes. Each ad 40 second thus even worse than television ads ratio.
@bits26467 ай бұрын
Atacms is ballistic, Storm shadow/tornado/scalp are autonomous cruising missiles... Can't exactly compare speeds of those 2 different classes. Good animation though, I like your videos
@Nebelwerfer0577 ай бұрын
Yep, apples and oranges.
@r.dunkley96256 ай бұрын
@bits2646 Astute observation and comment. 👍
@souradeepdas7111Ай бұрын
Yess, he is probably drunk
@DonetskBall8 ай бұрын
you publish videos as always in time! Thank you for explaining! I already watching it rn!
@Aitelly8 ай бұрын
Hope you enjoyed it!
@Neeboopsh8 ай бұрын
the new PrSM is now officially in service, which is a longer range missile that is fired from the same launchers. because of the medium range missile treaty that was recently scrapped, the prsm will be replacing atacms, so the US has now been delivering stockpiles of atacms to ukraine. i reckon some prsm missiles have also been used in ukraine, clandestinely, for testing
@ImperiumLibertas7 ай бұрын
I understand that there is a replacement missile design but there is evidence the US is over extending itself and is not manufacturing a replacement quantity of artillery shells or missiles. This is concerning when our strategy to counter China is to have more precision munitions to make up for the difference in naval ships and armor units. I hope we can wake up and realize we have to take care of ourselves before helping others. Or enhance and fix our production lines to make that possible. If it were up to me we wouldn't be involved in any of it.
@cymeriandesigns7 ай бұрын
I'd be a bit surprised if any Prsms have been used in Ukraine. The chance that Russia could capture one or analyze debris to determine how they work and their capabilities would be too great. They're the cutting edge of missile tech and we want to keep them away from the enemy as long as possible. It's one of Germany's reasons for not sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine.
@cymeriandesigns7 ай бұрын
@@ImperiumLibertasWitholding aid to Ukraine and their resulting defeat would make US involvement with China more likely. We're better off helping Ukraine and ramping up our own production of weapons and ammo than we would be in hoarding what we've got.
@ImperiumLibertas7 ай бұрын
@@cymeriandesigns how do you figure that? Russia and China aren't the best of friends. They are sometimes very limited strategic partners. Russia winning in Ukraine which will happen regardless of US supplies does not embolden China. China is in the middle of an economic collapse that they are struggling to control. The most analysis suggests China will invade between 2030-2035 which gives us between 6 and 11 years to get ready to defend our ally Taiwan. If we keep sending shipments to Ukraine we will not be ready which will result in more lost America lives.
@TrusePkay7 ай бұрын
Only a tiny amount of ATACMs successfully reached their targets. Most get jammed or intercepted
@abirmahmud38098 ай бұрын
Common Word in AITelly........ 1. Last but not the list 2. Step by Step 3. We discuss in few Later 4. Our Previous Video 5. We avoid Politics 6. Like & Subscribe
@billwhite16037 ай бұрын
ATACMS is a land based launched ballistic missile and you compare it's speed to two cruise missiles? Those cruise missile are more similar to USA Tomahawk missile family where the ATACMS is more similar to Russia's Kinzhal missile.
@АланМагометовичИсаев7 ай бұрын
Rather, a ballistic missile of the Iskander complex. The Dagger is an air-launched rocket and accelerates faster than anyone else. Although the Iskander rocket surpasses ATOM in all characteristics and is even cheaper. This is not because I am from Russia, but because this is objective data, my friend))
@asscold136 ай бұрын
@onevablo1692 Іскандер та Кинджал, це та сама ракета, просто різного базування
@pohuistmnogoraz5 ай бұрын
@@АланМагометовичИсаев In comparison, it should be compared more with Tornado-S, it is not correct to compare these missiles with Iskander, Iskander is a heavier system - the usual equipment with high explosives is more of a compromise than the norm
@Christiancstennis8 ай бұрын
24 April : US army secretly deliverying ATACMS to ukraine 26 April : AiTelly: step by step
@Aitelly8 ай бұрын
Yes :)
@poserdragon7197 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly Awesome, very cool
@bunusharma42227 ай бұрын
Some people has habit always complaining about your videos. You guys doing good job.keep it up 👍
@tomislavb57607 ай бұрын
The INS (inertial nav system) is an amazing piece of 1940/50's technology.
@ronniewilliams98847 ай бұрын
I believe it came from Britain as it was used in the scrapped TSR 2 project
@raz43717 ай бұрын
I literally just searched for this yesterday and you didn't have a video on it... NICE!
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Thanks Hope you enjoyed it!
@saadsajidul90017 ай бұрын
can you explain the TOS-1A munitons
@МишаКузнец-м1р7 ай бұрын
Объемно детонирующий.
@richardletaw40685 ай бұрын
This is my first visit to your channel. Having heard so much about the ATACMS system, I was intensely curious about it. Your explanation could not have been clearer. I’ll be back for more. Thanks!
@Red-Magic7 ай бұрын
8:00 Funny you use the S-400 as an example. That exacty scenario is what has been all over my news today, where the S-400 attempted and failed to interceot the ATACMS before it air bursted
@isadanjan47626 ай бұрын
The S400/Patriot is not designed to intercept ballistic missiles; there are other systems for that. Let me also remind you that in Israel, Patriot was unable to intercept 6 Iranian ballistic missiles out of 8 that it launched.
@treycotter5 ай бұрын
@@isadanjan4762Which incident are you referring to?
@vanhelsing54694 ай бұрын
@@treycotter North Korea even has KN24, Hwasongpho-11Na, Hwasong-11Na (an external copy of ATACMS) with better characteristics than ATACMS itself 😆
@bradcolby17 ай бұрын
As always,excellent work! 👏
@THEBEAST21337 ай бұрын
Keep up the good work guys!! I look forward to viewing your videos!
@hardheadjarhead7 ай бұрын
Can it kill a bridge?
@bsoul31777 ай бұрын
Yes
@musicmaker997 ай бұрын
I guess we'll soon find out.
@michamichaowski83757 ай бұрын
Yes with harpoon warhead
@itsericzhou7 ай бұрын
Given its explosive mass, even if it didn’t destroy the bridge, it would damage the road/rails and the structures underneath them to the point where large sections would have to be replaced and the integrity of nearby structures like support pillars would have to be examined
@КотПаша-м2т7 ай бұрын
Какой? Киевский? Он может разрушить все 12 мостов в Киеве. И верховную раду. Искандером.
@LawatheMEid7 ай бұрын
Any explanation why exposed rockets self exploding or mostly starting its solid rocket motor when an explosion happened near them? Shock wave, emp Or just shrapnel?!
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Can you rephrase your Question
@LawatheMEid7 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly i saw many videos when targeting positions: an explosion cause of aerial bomb or a rocket then the rockets where are far about 20~30 meters from the explosion starts flying every where even they are on the ground not in launcher!
@Joetechlincolns7 ай бұрын
I believe you are talking about munitions that get hit with fragmentation strikes or tungsten balls from artillery or strike missile. Known as secondary explosions. My guess is the strike sets off the rocket propellant or munitions somehow.
@LawatheMEid7 ай бұрын
@@Joetechlincolns my question is about this "some how": shock wave or emp will trigger the munition or the solid fuel rocket?
@Donkeymaster90007 ай бұрын
The ending, that’s amazing work. Definitely want more of that animation
@Mihilez7 ай бұрын
Could you make one for the HAROP? Or LORA Tactical Missile?
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
I jus t Researched and saw The IAI Harop is a loitering munition developed by the MBT division of Israel Aerospace Industries. Loitering munitions are designed to loiter above the
@MausTheGerman7 ай бұрын
I waited for this video! Great channel 👍
@gordonwalter42934 ай бұрын
Well done. Interesting, informative but not too advanced explanation, and well synchronized explanation with animated illustration.
@chandrachurniyogi83947 ай бұрын
the ATACMS adopted as a surface-to-air missile modified to take out aerial drones . . . a SAM variant of ATACMS will retain the tiny bomblets of cluster munitions inside the warhead . . . a ATACMS missile is launched against incoming strike drones, moving in close formation . . . the missile detonates in close proximity to incoming drones & the exploding cluster of tiny bomblets destroy every single incoming strike drone . . . but the missile needs to intercept & destroy the incoming drones before they leave formation & head of a to engaging their individual targets . . .
@georgesikimeti21847 ай бұрын
The area of proximity?1km square kilometres or more?
@DudeLabowski-z5iАй бұрын
2300 miles per hour is insane speed!! It's faster than the other 2 combined and I love that ❤
@hosseinmohammadi45747 ай бұрын
3:00 Comparing speed of rocket motor to jet? Two very different categories
@texaspapa94457 ай бұрын
INS will get the missile close to the target but the course corrections are not as exact as GPS so the impact can be off significantly as compared to GPS.
@ryanjordan72687 ай бұрын
Excellent video 📹!!! Your content rocks 🪨 🎸!!
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Thanks so much!!
@andrewgordon2357 ай бұрын
Is ATACMS the successor to the hawk missile?
@Arizona_Raven7 ай бұрын
Is there a pulley to lift the rocket into the Reload Arm Assembly so a single person can reload the system?
@Saykes19947 ай бұрын
3:23 Why the speed was not indicated in kilometers and meters per second!
@thatravendude2 ай бұрын
Becouse the US don't roll that way... We use freedom units thank you very much.
@felipecogo46717 ай бұрын
Excellent animation! Just a small correction, at 3:42, the missile KH-101 use a mall turbofan engine (the cylinder below the missile body) not a rocket engine. Storm Shadow and Tomahawk uses the same technology, but keep the motor inside, for better stealth characteristics.
@LIONTAMER3D7 ай бұрын
This is why pootin is desperate to jam GPS lol
@ardykisworo50586 ай бұрын
Putin made GPS and america made glonass? Lol 😂😂
@gregweston37705 ай бұрын
Do your research NATO started the Ukraine war
@LogosTheos5 ай бұрын
@@gregweston3770 Actually you need to do your research. Putin started the war by invading in 2014 and 2022. He also used cyber attacks, bribery and economic cohesion against Ukraine since 2004. He has always been messing with Ukraine because he is delusional
@FacitOmniaVoluntas.5 ай бұрын
@@gregweston3770Do your research. This war is only Russia’s fault.
@aguy27635 ай бұрын
@@FacitOmniaVoluntas.nah, ukraine broke multiple contracts resulting in a war
@awesomeguy-nr6bj7 ай бұрын
Incredible technology 👍
@glennbrymer4065Ай бұрын
Excellent brief. Thank you. Very well done.
@AitellyАй бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@kinosaki33117 ай бұрын
Great Video but it will be even better if it includes how ATACMS differs from others in reacting to counter measures.
@marshalllapenta76567 ай бұрын
Question? Is it possible that the enemy could hack the satellites? Has the missile ever been dropped on a target, without it going off? How hot is the propellant burning? How did they figure out the speed of the missile? Does the Russian Radar pick up the ATACMS MISSLE? I like how the fins are able to fold in? I betcha I could tell you where Lockheed produces these at?
@shekhar52827 ай бұрын
Ur videos are amazing, what software do u use to prepare this animation
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Blender for 3d Adobe After Effects for Compositing and Adobe Primer for Editing
@capito04298 ай бұрын
정말 멋진 영상이예요
@r.dunkley96256 ай бұрын
This is the first video of yours that I have seen and I found it quite informative. I am Canadian and of an older generation and en engineer so I am versed in both metric and imperial unit systems and I found it curious that you stated some measurements in both silly units and metric in one part of the video and then just stuck to silly units in most of the video. That signals to me that you are Americans because you're the only country that has stuck with imperial units (although you buggered up the gallon measurement) while the rest of us have moved on to the much more sensible and easier to work with and understand metric system. I would suggest that in future you provide both imperial and metric measurements for all dimensions and specifications you provide so that everyone watching your video can fully understand them and fully comprehend the information you're providing. Most of the world doesn't understand the units that you use and that's because your units are silly and there's no logical case to be made for continuing to use them other than the fact that the majority of your population is too stubborn to learn metric. We Canadians were tasked with doing that back in the early 70s and we managed to do it albeit probably with some protest and complaints. That same task seems to have proved too difficult for America to complete and you've stuck steadfastly to your system of silly units although I find it interesting that my American made car is assembled with metric bolts. Most of us in Canada now live in a world where both systems of measurement are used and we somehow manage to understand and get along with both systems. Being Canadian and an engineer who grew up when we (Canada) were converting to metric, I'm probably more adept at converting between unit systems than anyone but I'm not fast enough to be able to convert the antiquated and irrelevant (to most of the world) specifications you provide in this video to units that are meaningful to me while I'm watching the video. So, if you're Americans and you want only Americans to be able to relate to and understand most of the things you're reporting in these videos then go on only providing specifications in your silly units that the rest of the world doesn't use and doesn't understand. If you'd like to reach a wider audience, then I'd suggest you provide the metric conversions on all the dimensions and specifications you give in your videos.
@1drmr37 ай бұрын
Can you explain how the aegis system works?
@ArgeliReyes-y9r7 ай бұрын
Your. Videos are just amazing and it is because the way you explain and the animation
@Dutchman5367 ай бұрын
Nice piece sir , how do you measure ( location ) your target , and how to find it ................ ?!
@BIG-DIPPER-5624 күн бұрын
Very Nice - Thanks ! 👍
@MarxMin7 ай бұрын
Telly can you please do a video on the various drone dropped munitions used in the Ukraine conflict and various other theaters nowadays! Thanks! Love your videos!
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Thanks Will research on the said Subject
@oneshotme7 ай бұрын
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
@stephanweiskorn67607 ай бұрын
Excellent video 😊!
@tobiwan0016 ай бұрын
3:30 Storm Shadow is a cruise missile and ATACMS is a ballistic missile. It makes no sense to compare them. There is nothing exceptional about a ballistic missile going Mach 3.
@treycotter5 ай бұрын
They’re just compared because they’re both notable weapons striking deep behind lines in ukraine so it’s relevant to compare them to see what the differences are.
@jeffreybrewer86497 ай бұрын
Good video. But, it seems like adding the RANGE of any self contained projectile weapon (missile, cruise missile, rocket, etc) would be a key piece of info -- especially if comparing to other weapons
@dandumurali-z5b7 ай бұрын
I'm impressed with your work.. Keep doing it..
@Christiancstennis7 ай бұрын
Do a video on boeing P 8 Poseidon
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
i doubt it will get views. KZbin Algorithm is sadly defined by SEOS (search engine Optimizations)
@1badjesus4 ай бұрын
? .. how does THIS ATACMS video differ from one 8 months ago?
@BobSmith-rp2oz7 ай бұрын
Great video just wish it was in modern measurements
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the Feedback.
@leandrokataoka24357 ай бұрын
Would you consider working on a video covering dense inert metal explosive? Thank you for the content
@ashleyoasis79487 ай бұрын
can you also tell us how radar works in never did physics in high school
@professor_of_logic5 ай бұрын
Could you please explain ATACMS to us, on a single example, i don't know something like: "Civilians on the Beach - how to be as efficient as possible with cluster amunition"?! Or something like that...I'm just asking for a Friend.
@Victor-vj5ds4 ай бұрын
Lol, russia admitted they shot down the ATACMS over the beach causing debris to fall on the beach on the day it happened.
@biafra137437 ай бұрын
Please do a video on the themis unmanned ground vehicle...
@-ViXpo-7 ай бұрын
I'd love to see a video about K2,, Black Panther"👀
@VES.7 ай бұрын
ATACMS speed should be compared to Iskander not KH 101 or Scalp / Storm Shadow ! you compare oringes to aplles ...
@chukwuemekaemmanuel7857 ай бұрын
At this point I think KZbin is reading my mind i was just thinking 🤔 about howr Atacm and himars only just to scroll and see this video 🎉❤
@gregdolan7801Ай бұрын
Damn the military industrial complex.
@Broken_dish7 ай бұрын
brother dont compare atacms with storm shadow they are not even in the same kind of missile cruise missiles like storm shadow dont go past mach 1 atacms is a tactical ballistic missile so you should compare it to another ballistic missile the kh1101 is also a cruise missile why didnt you pick another ballistic im so confused like of course its faster thats the nature of the kind of missile it is...
@gemnicherry26707 ай бұрын
I came to make the same comment
@daCount07 ай бұрын
Gorgeous animation it is
@joseph873287 ай бұрын
what type of missile is Russia using to down these missiles today in Crimea? Can you make a video that could show how they are intercepting them? Your videos are very good . thank you
@Ont5257 ай бұрын
They are intercepting these with infantry, buildings, and grounded planes.
@KenC56mm7 ай бұрын
Simple. They aren't intercepting
@vanhelsing54694 ай бұрын
@@KenC56mm 4 days ago, Russian air defense shot down two missiles (one of them with a cluster warhead) and it fell into a residential building where there were no military personnel, and the submunitions that were not activated scattered in different directions.
@vanhelsing54694 ай бұрын
@@KenC56mm North Korea even has KN24, Hwasongpho-11Na, Hwasong-11Na (an external copy of ATACMS) with better characteristics than ATACMS itself 😆
@KenC56mm4 ай бұрын
@@vanhelsing5469 🤣
@lucasgarcia72307 ай бұрын
Could you do an audio translation for Spanish even with AI?
@ManuelGomes-hi3wm7 ай бұрын
Amazing video brother, Ukraine has been using these effectively
@MyFluffyClouds7 ай бұрын
What if Russia sees this and works out how to make them / countermeasure. Is this why GPS jamming signals are interfering with European commercial airline travel as reported in recent news?
@gr33ny247 ай бұрын
Are you planning to do F-22 Raptor?
@DennisTyler-yv5jt7 ай бұрын
Great work guy's
@josephyasid91428 ай бұрын
Next video B-1 lancer
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
We did a small Video of the B1 Lancer
@Deflection5 ай бұрын
Can you use a couple of Fat Man Nukes as it's payload instead? -Vault Dweller 🤔
@MattH-wg7ou6 ай бұрын
3:45 you're comparing cruise missiles to ballistic missiles. Not comparable. But still good video!
@legion62777 ай бұрын
The cluster version is the ticket 👍
@t1ll3167 ай бұрын
dont know what bangs harder, the munition or the video!
@pushaktysak91246 ай бұрын
very good missile, now we can confirm this)
@treycotter5 ай бұрын
@onevablo1692Well you’re comparing a single fired 9,000 lb missile to a multiple launch 3,500 lb missile. The ATACMS has been seen destroying an entire s400 battery so I’d say it’s pretty good at anti air defense.
@vanhelsing54694 ай бұрын
North Korea even has KN24, Hwasongpho-11Na, Hwasong-11Na (an external copy of ATACMS) with better characteristics than ATACMS itself 😆
@davebosch93857 ай бұрын
USING OF MAGNETIC LASER CAN CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF MISSILE AND CAN STOP THE EXPLOTION
@lucasgarcia72307 ай бұрын
what you say makes no sense
@davebosch93857 ай бұрын
@@lucasgarcia7230 BUILT A MAGNETIC LASER AND 1 BILLION % THE PROOF IS WORKING LOOK AT THE LASER USING OF UFO,, THAT IS A MAGNETIC LIGHT
@davebosch93857 ай бұрын
@@lucasgarcia7230 5 BILLION DOLLAR IM WRITE HOW TO MAKE A MAGNETIC LASER
@davebosch93857 ай бұрын
@@lucasgarcia7230 CERN CAN CONVERT INTO MAGNETIC LASER,, 3 BILLION DOLLAR IM WRITE HOW TO CONVERT THE CERN INTO MAGNETIC LASER
@davebosch93857 ай бұрын
WRITE AND SHOW IF YOU HAVE AN INTILLIGENT BOASTFUL,, SHAME !@@lucasgarcia7230
@trawgr86527 ай бұрын
Well done.
@Just_A_Random_Desk8 ай бұрын
3:33 You can't in good faith compare a tactical ballistic missile to a cruise missile.
@Aitelly8 ай бұрын
Apologies we just got carried away :(
@Just_A_Random_Desk7 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly It's all good just something to keep in mind for future videos.
@leafybug047 ай бұрын
Why are we comparing ballistic missiles to cruise missiles as if they are in the same class of weaponry?
@sauer907 ай бұрын
because its interesting to see the difference.
@nikhilesh93217 ай бұрын
Please make video on latest EMBT tank ❤
@xwyl7 ай бұрын
Beautiful
@matthewwagner479 күн бұрын
Your not metioning the actually diameter is the baliatic missile and hypersonic weapons
@rickishit7 ай бұрын
*Behind the scenes of the missile:* Turn left, Turn right in 100 m, Point Up, You have arrived at your destination. BOOM.
@saifullah7917 ай бұрын
Good information Can you make video on Shaheen 3 capability? Pakistan missile program is Dangerous more than Iran or India?
@DrTofutybeast26 күн бұрын
Excellent vedio
@nicolasrose30647 ай бұрын
Houthi Cleric furiously tapping a chisel trying to inscribe on a stone tablet as much of this videos information, as his assistant can translate .....
@DavidRobertson-pk4ld5 ай бұрын
Very informative commentary…thanks
@ДЫМЯЩИЙАУТСАЙДЕР7 ай бұрын
Let's make some video about 155mm erfb, rocket assistant and vulcano shell
@somanathan42717 ай бұрын
Bro use SI units for better understanding 😊😊
@DavidMuchima6 ай бұрын
Now we’re all on the FBI watch list
@عربي-ك7ن7 ай бұрын
Can you give me a link to your next channel?
@jeroenvangastel90797 ай бұрын
PLEASE MAKE THE ABRAMS X PLEASE
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Noted will do that
@jeroenvangastel90797 ай бұрын
YES YES YEEEEEEEEES
@jeroenvangastel90797 ай бұрын
Oh ye if you see this again please say in that vid that I said it but dont try to say it, just type it :)
@silvercloud-u5g7 ай бұрын
V2 perfected
@bigtee21077 ай бұрын
Iskander next please
@عبدالله-ك9ر2ي7 ай бұрын
Please add an audio translation for Arabic
@Aitelly7 ай бұрын
Noted
@supriyantosupriyanto61937 ай бұрын
tell us about latest russian turtle tank
@rodmackinnon2995Ай бұрын
I thought he was having a stroke when pronouncing a few of the words. like the r in mlrs or gps near the end. Is this Ai narrated? It repeated a few things too... weird.
@pehtongpitak7 ай бұрын
Preformed Fragments = Cluster Bomb
@tomaszbudnik5214 ай бұрын
In my opinion comparison between solid fuel rocket and jet propelled missiles is senseless. ATACAM have way smaller range but way higher speed. Those are different types of weapon designed to different tasks and conditions.
@stumpywest16527 ай бұрын
comparing cruise missiles to this is rather annoying