Autodesk Inventor: Jet Engine Fan

[@tuskiomisham]

Right, I'm sure I didn't need to say this, but this wouldn't be used in an actual jet, ever.

[@Socks3657]

Im very curious to know why! Could you explain please?

[@Socks3657]

@@crazycontraptions1249 thank you a lot! Yes I know all of those details, very interesting how they could figure that out on real turbofan blades tho! Thanks!!

[@chrome4096]

@@Socks3657 actually you start with him not using airfoils, there are so called blisks in modern fighter compressors that don't have separate blades. The angles of tips are also wrong, they would generally be more not less than 45 degrees. Also there are thicker airfoils almost curves in the bottom and supercritical profiles at the tip. the angle of incidence hast to be calculated or at least approximated for a small hobby design. Also there a probably way to many blades there, as this seems to try to imitate a wide chord blade

[@SaintZ42]

@@Socks3657 Also I think it doesn't take an aerospace engineer to tell that just moving some lines around and eyeballing it doesn't make a working jet engine turbine. It's just an example of how to make something that looks like one

[@danielthiele9710]

how tf did you get the pointy thing

[@XaymacaJah]

beautiful work and speed. I did not realize that some turbofan inlet blades had no chamber...... The inlet blades, on the engines on the KC 135's i used to work on , had a lift profile on them.. were you doing those of the GE 90 inlet blades?

[@chrome4096]

you probably mean camber. Well you need an airfoil for that...this is not a real fan. it would never really work, and probably destroy itself before reaching reasonable rpm

[@AnitaSharma-bz8om]

Bro which application is used by you for this 3d model ?? Is this free or paid application ??

[@brandonquinto4852]

autodesk inventor

[@krishnannarayanan8819]

Paid, costs a lot. Better if you get it from educational license. Autodesk Inventor.

[@santiagorinconmartinez6324]

great