Autoloader How it Works T90 M | Main Battle Tank Engineering Explained

[@Aitelly]

Please Subscribe Thanks

[@ion8264]

You are awesome

[@matthewcherrington2634]

8.3 is not the tallest human

[@ОлегКрижановский-э1ю]

Please Subscribe Tanks)

[@XxboxodxX-nk4mz]

mhm yes sentence

[@ZaraTheFemboy]

@21XxboxodxX21 you can really tell it's made by AI can't you? I felt like half the stuff it said had nothing to do with the autoloader

[@Tokarev.-]

"I hope this basic explanation helps you drive the T-90 tank." thank you so much, my T90M has been sitting in my garage for so long, time to finally use it 🤗

[@vitalilenz8789]

yes times test drive, to the food market

[@dukepepe8086]

ur pfp explains it💀

[@Tokarev.-]

@@dukepepe8086 ?

[@Dr.SamuelHayden]

@@dukepepe8086 ?

[@Ivanbeingasianofficial]

I think he meant that cause Ur profile is a Soviet Like thingy

[@allent.g560]

Correction, 1:50 the T-90M is fitted with the 2A46M-5 gun and the T-14 has the 2A82-1M gun. 1:57 The gunner machine gun is the 7.62mm PKTM, not 7.5mm.

[@dust_gale3108]

It has 2 types of guns. Newer one is for newer models that are currently produced. It is a little longer so it has a bit more energy

[@divoulos5758]

@Dust_Gale not just that but i think it can fire newer apdsfs rounds

[@MotivationSHCUM]

And one more correction coaxial is 7.62mm, I don't know how people can get this wrong with data available

[@Globalscanningeyes]

@@dust_gale3108 no,there is no mention of the t-90m gun being used in the armata anywhere.

[@EugenGenrich]

@@Globalscanningeyes It's the other way around. Newer T-90M's use the Armata gun.

[@andrewfeldmann7762]

"I hope this basic explination helps you drive the T-90 tank." Thanks, I've been having trouble getting the hang of my tank's controls, lol.

[@crimsonram77]

As if I have 4.5Million USD laying around

[@EmperorMelon-u6v]

@@crimsonram77 i am a brit so how much is this in british pounds

[@user-phoenix-A69]

@@EmperorMelon-u6vits 3.4million pounds :)

[@CloneDAnon]

In over 90% of the "ammo detonation" cases it is NOT the autoloader that detonates / cooks off in T72 tanks, but the extra ammo carried outside the carousel. Ammo detonation does not have anything to do with the carousel, since all the tanks detonate if the ammunition they carry inside is inside their hulls (just like with Leopard 2 for example). The thing is the carousel is a reallly small target in the T72 (its much smaller than T64 or T80 carousel) and it has some protection, but it also can carry only 22 rounds. Hence, the need for storing the extra ammo in a bustle in T90M, rather than loosely around the turret and hull.

[@thefrunze.198]

Finally somebody said it

[@BigSmartArmed]

There is no use, Americans are no longer able to process factual information, America is a death cult. America is trained to repeat propaganda dogma while critical thinking is punished.

[@iasha740]

Was going to say the same. There's a lot of people out there ridiculizing russian tanks (all thanks to the memes) that don't know that. Funny enough, all the tanks in the worls excluding some very very few modern tanks store rounds inside the vehicle. Their turrets don't blow up because there is no carrousel autoloader to ignite when a round pierces it. Fun fact is that the crew inside don't really give a shit if the turret ejects or not, they are dead anyway.

[@user-tv7fg7wt2d]

@@iasha740 Not having a carousel does not prevent turrets from blowing off. Leo 2s in Turkey got their turrets pop even though they didn't have a carousel. Type 69s during the Gulf War got theirs popped as well. As long as enough pressure is pumped to the turret, then it will blow off.

[@erichammond9308]

Actually, have you ever heard of "blow-out panels"? Most modern NATO tanks are equipped with blow-out panels that vent the explosion and won't launch their turret. The autoloader system prevents the use of blow-out panels. So, yeah, the autoloader system is what causes the Russian tanks to launch turret and crew into low earth orbit when they are hit.

[@polnoeceloe]

The relatively light weight, reduced dimensions and low profile of the tank provide a number of important advantages. These are increased cross-country ability through mud and small bridges, reduced visibility of the tank and more chances of a miss when trying to hit this tank. You should also not forget that this and other Russian tanks are much more mass produced. Russian technology is also cheaper, less demanding in operation and maintenance, and this is often forgotten. In the final comparison of all parameters, the Russian tank and other Russian weapons are much better suited for mass war

[@bestvideos4ever1]

@user-sy6um5py3o не только танки лутшие в мире, но автомат калашникова, ДШК, Грантамёты, и еще с пол сотни лутших в мире СОВЕСТКИХ изобретений и пилотаж ПОЛЁТА МЫСЛИ ВЫСШИЙ ТЕХНИКИ в мире !!!! Одни СОВЕСТКИЕ Вертолёты чего стоят, военные канешно. Лутше только гражданские аербусы-вертолёты, но не военные ! ЗАПАД всё ! ничего нового непридумали, да и склады что было ЛУТШЕЕ проепали....походу ЗАПАДА ждёт ПЕРЕСТРОЙКА :)))) СССР

[@VanDerPloeg]

"Much more mass-produced" yeah maybe the older obsolete models As Russia can't afford to mass-produce the newer models. "Russian technology is also cheaper, less demanding in maintenance and operation" Which likely just means it won't operate as well as its Western counterparts do (furthermore many of the newer tanks like T90 and Armada use imported technology from the west or elsewhere, computers for various things Optics, Etc so its not even Russian technology (Oh and it tends to be older tek aswell) "The Russian tank and other Russian weapons are much better suited for Mass War" In a mass war were you expect to lose your cheap and easy to mass-produced things on Mass they Sure ARE THE BEST! Because if they weren't going to be lost or destroyed on mass why would you make them cheap and easy to mass-produce to begin with? Unless of course you were expecting them to be lost and destroyed on Mass. :] Good old Soviet Doctrine quantity over quality

[@polnoeceloe]

@@VanDerPloeg You can only win a mass war with mass vehicles. Europe is very small, so they don't understand it. Small scale, small thinking. They send 2 Patriots or 15 Leopards to Ukraine... It's just a lack of understanding of what a war is, where 1 million people are fighting on both sides. Leopard or Patriot, even if he is good, he has no chance of surviving

[@polnoeceloe]

@o.k.2968 Size matters in many cases, when, for example, a low tank is not visible behind a small building, a small hill. It's easier for him to dig a hole to dig in. When the target is smaller, it is more difficult to detect it from a long distance, for example, from a UAV. The operator may not notice it, or spend more time detecting it, and in combat every second is valuable, he loses his time. This time is received by the enemy and used to kill you

[@gohanescobar]

@@VanDerPloeg ну че как результаты по леопардам? Получили так ,что наглосаксы из жалкой британии свой челленджер запретили использовать на передней крае,а только из закрытой позиции. Что ж,ждем абрамсы от пендосов, с удовольствием посмотрим как они горят, такие качественные и красивые)

[@78RSI]

Если посмотреть на основное боевое применение танка (поддержка пехоты), то стрельбу ведут каруселью из двух танков с откатом на перезарядку и автомат заряжания очень полезная вещь для увеличения плотности огня, заряжающий не выдержит такого темпа в условиях разнонаправленного движения машины. А конструкция всего оружия СССР и России опирается на мобилизационную армию, где учат быстро и большими группами, справедливо от АК до Т72. У нас всё просто и надежно, калаш сможет разобрать и почистить любой школьник.

[@dobrendo5909]

Возможность есть но это не реализуемо пока львами управляют бараны.

[@natashaghibli8764]

Все просто: россия страна-террористка а Путин военный преступник.

[@someguy9607]

M-16 тоже может разобрать для чистки любой школьник, причем даже быстрее - там нажатием на один подпружиненный штырь верхняя часть (upper receiver) отделяется от нижней.

[@78RSI]

@@someguy9607 А ты умеешь выдирать слова из коммента и делать из них перемогу. )

[@someguy9607]

@@78RSI причем здесь перемога? Любое оружие делается максимально простым, где это возможно, чтобы с ним мог справиться безмозглый школьник, это не советсвкое ноу хау -- какой еще идиот пойдет добровольно на бойню ? Только вчерашний школьник или не очень смышленный индивид.

[@someboi4535]

The T-90 and the T-14 don't use the same gun, they're different The new armor for the T-90M carousel will significantly reduce the chance of an ammo cook-off but not completely eliminate it Having 3 crew members instead of 4 is not a con, it is a double edged sword itself, it has both pros and cons

[@mikeymike9926]

pros: when your tank detonates with the help of a enemy shell, you lose lose three men!

[@trololoev]

@@mikeymike9926 also - 12 tankers has 4 tanks, but in abrams 12 tankers has only 3 tanks. And autoloader reload on the move and less likely to broke.

[@mikeymike9926]

@@trololoev What prevents other tanks from being able to reload on the move, and how does an autoloader have less chances to break.

[@juryfilatov4520]

@@mikeymike9926 When you have a task to make 20 shots in 3 minutes, you don't need to change the loader for a new one =)

[@leonardoorellano6652]

@@mikeymike9926 you have to really experience it. to load when the vehicle is moving fast in rough terrain

[@Alex-og3ev]

Steering works a bit differently, lever has two positions. First engages lower gear in planetary mechanism so the corresponding track moves slower. Pulling both levers together slows the tank but puts more force on tracks, this is used to clear most difficult obstacles. Second position applies brake to that side.

[@azgarogly]

Wasn't it two stage planetary gearbox, so the lever has a forward driving position, first position for wide turn, second position for tighter turn and rear position for braking the track?

[@Alex-og3ev]

@@azgarogly No. T-62 and earlier models had one main gearbox and two of these two-stage ones on sides for turning the tank. But one gear in them was direct and one low so the lever was working just the same. T-72 and newer got two independent main gearboxes, one for each side, and lever engages lower gear in corresponding one when pulled. Although I was told that they don't have that second "brake" position anymore, and latest T-90M got steering wheel instead.

[@ТерскийРоман]

Я в шоке от качества подачи материала , пусть даже с небольшими неточностями. Молодцы!

[@BigSmartArmed]

A small error - PKT is 7.62mm not 7.5mm

[@ComdrPirozhki]

This is very well done. I love how it doesn’t mention any current events rather just tells you what the tank is capable of and how it works.

[@MRook42]

And where to shoot at

[@azgarogly]

Except it has several serious factual mistakes.

[@azgarogly]

@octopus_news Every tank "is capable of" being destroyed by pretty much any weapon. The point is where and then it is hit. Most modern main battle tanks frontal armour would not be defeated by rocket propelled grenades. But the engine deck is quite vulnerable from above. When the drones in Ukraine are flying above the tanks which has hatches open, even the 40mm grenade dropped well can disable the tank.

[@RedVRCC]

yeah tired of seeing shit about the war on content not even directly related to it

[@JanBanan333]

The T-90M ‚Proryv‘, the standard issue right now, actually has an automatic gearbox and also has a steering wheel. There is a lot of footage of the drivers section, with a representative of the Russian defense ministry even saying that it has a automatic transmission.

[@alexmoos6858]

Это очень хорошо, при поломке ремонт будет происходить, дольше и дороже.

[@sasagg3619]

@@alexmoos6858 ездий на ишаке тогда

[@hwbxjr]

@@alexmoos6858 зато экипаж будет чаще выживать

[@23GreyFox]

The T90 reverse speed is still somehow shit.

[@hwbxjr]

@@23GreyFox on new versions a new gearbox with better reverse speed is installed

[@alizaidi5610]

I really appreciate how you all just put the information out there with no biases.

[@shouri-j]

All of your videos are awesome. ❤ From 🇮🇳

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 👍

[@fiftycal1]

I’m a medically retired US Navy LT (03). I find Army Technology interesting. The Abrams has Air Conditioning. If I had to spend a week buttoned up in a Tank - I’ll take The Abrams. With regards to which tank is better in combat (Abrams versus T90) - I think 🤔 it depends on who gets off the 1st round. Personally I wouldn’t want to face either one. Your animation is jaw dropping excellent! Wow - you deserve so much more recognition!

[@ПериметрПериметр]

The T-90 tank and the upgraded T-72B3 tanks have air conditioning and climate control. Your stereotypes are outdated.

[@wonkothesane7000]

Air Conditioning is standard if you don't want to breath radioactive dust.

[@TheEreke001]

in real fight, tank's lives 15-20 min. air conditions important in long range moving

[@ппоо-п2я]

@@ПериметрПериметр Ни на одном брошенном , ни сгоревшем в Украине нет кондея. Да и загажены всяким шматьём, русишь швайнэ в нём живёт.

[@Baebon6259]

@@ПериметрПериметр you're right. T-90 get heat from NLAW and Javelin to warm its crew. Once the turret is tossed up then fresh air from the outside cool off its burned crew. Very efficient process I must say.

[@RelativnoVisok]

We need a TOS-1A video!!!

[@alexmoos6858]

Кому это нам?🤣 Вот своих и проси.

[@Kawaii_Boy3]

​@@alexmoos6858 укроботик, потише себя веди

[@nguyenhieu6731]

Tos-2A >>> Tos-1A

[@RelativnoVisok]

???

[@Kawaii_Boy3]

@@public_sensei леопарды горят 🔥🔥

[@is-3shchuka765]

How did you guys do such a well made interior model for the t90M? crazy how on point it is.

[@Just_A_Random_Desk]

T-90s have the same powder keg autoloader as the T-72s.

[@Vincent98987]

@@Just_A_Random_Desk But T-90MS turret doesn't really eject even with that keg

[@Just_A_Random_Desk]

@@Vincent98987 One already has. It was targeted by HIMARS.

[@watchman0062]

@@Vincent98987 I have a question. Why does the T-90M seem to have a western shaped turret?

[@MarinePigVa]

@@watchman0062 They copy a lot of western technologies.

[@anticontraband]

thanks for this! i have my driving test tmrw and i feel alot more prepared having watched this 👍

[@KGAnims]

Fantastic presentation. As someone who uses Blender - this animation is crazy. Lots of efforts put into this, good work!

[@agrippa7712]

I really need this, I’m going to buy my own tank

[@creeguyvernon]

I got to see inside a Leopard 1a5, there's a basket behind the gun to collect the spent shells 👍

[@имяфамилия-я6ж5я]

на практике показала хрупки танк

[@Funny.Videos1622]

wow first time i see explaining the T90M precicly on point i love this channel

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 🙏👍

[@searaider3340]

Wow, this is the most detailed tank video I have ever seen. You guys earned a subscriber.

[@bathanhvu6336]

ya

[@ПацанКрасавчик-м5в]

Отличный обзор танка!Спасибо вам за ваш труд!Ждем новых видео!

[@vlaspindosso7274]

да он поверхностно знает технику рф

[@10TonneSkeleton]

​@@vlaspindosso7274 я не претендую на звание эксперта советской/российской техники, но в видео всё по делу сказано

[@pro1000pro]

это не обзор , а руководство для украинцев - как пользоваться трофейной российской техникой . Руководство выпущено при поддержке минобороны США

[@ПацанКрасавчик-м5в]

@@pro1000pro в видео не показан пуск двигателя,загрузка бк,запуск СУО,ЕТО двигателя,поэтому просто обзор.Про то что показано,что правая кнопка на пульте управления наводчика-это огонь из орудия,а левая из ПКТ-секрета здесь нет,на 72-х,64-х аналогично-по правилу сильной руки.

[@vlaspindosso7274]

@@10TonneSkeleton эксперт какой отрасли:7 мехник ,конструктор ,управляющий, или книжный кресельный

[@tnminhkhoi1398]

T90 is an offensive tank and operates on massive plains of Eastern Europe. The Autoloader is necessary as it makes the tank shorter and smaller, and thus easier to hide.

[@AnmolX-jw8jr]

No it is a defensive tank let me give an example: leopard tanks are more big in Comparison to any Russian tank,now why is this, because it is made for forest areas Like in Europe or Germany itself. T 90 is a defensive tank because it is made for open field that of russia. If any tank was for offensive the design would be reversed like leo2 being smaller than t90 or t72. Same for Russian tank they would be bigger in another universe

[@AnmolX-jw8jr]

Get it

[@Sherlock_Holms]

@@AnmolX-jw8jr The leopard is larger because the Western school of tank building took the path of increasing armor, which is obviously not effective today.

[@onerimeuse]

How, how does a channel producing this quality a video, only have 186k subs? This is such top tier work. This is exactly something I've been looking for for understanding scales for things in game development, but it's got even more than just scales.... you guys go all the way through the mechanisms and operations... so so good. Thank you.

[@Aitelly]

Thanks for the encouragement 🙏 more Videos coming out soon.

[@mariojakel5544]

@@Aitelly Explaining a T72BU? redesignated after the desaster in the 2. gulfwar into T90

[@tei3340]

Holy shit they got 20k subs in 12 days, I think their on a good road to 500k and hopefully a million

[@jailbreaker1214]

Quality video? they get so many easy things wrong! they dont do any significant amount of research. the only thing they do well is 3D modeling

[@fonesrphunny7242]

I just watched segments of this and almost all of them had some errors, or information was presented without proper context. I could imagine AI writing something like this. 3D and animation are serviceable, but it's not enough to entertain people with any *serious* interest in military technology.

[@uurr333_rs]

Brate, animacija saslužuje lajk i praćenje.👏👏👏Svaka čast!

[@Alexa.Costa222]

Слава Сербии !

[@aleksasimic32]

Jeste dobra animacija

[@worldoftancraft]

Iz Rossii s lûbovjju.

[@fantombike5647]

Это пособие для наших врагов. Твоё восхищение не уместно

[@fareghbandha886]

Russian prowess in weapon manufacturing is unmatched, establishing them as pioneers in the field. Their innovations and dedication have created a challenging and adventurous world. A heartfelt thank you to Russia for shaping the global landscape of weaponry.

[@cyrusgomes2411]

About time!! Excellent work man, keep up the good work.

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 🙏

[@korzer]

@@Aitelly You failed dude, why no response to the comments pointing out all the inaccuracy in your video

[@williammontpirg4080]

Very cool! You should do the BMP3 and bradley as well!

[@Aitelly]

Noted

[@klim6361]

Тема изложена подробнее и удобнее, чем в русских массовых источниках!У вас талант! Спасибо!

[@foxy8514]

Would love to see Merkava mk4 series. Such a special tank

[@Aitelly]

Many requests I see.

[@DarmoeD88]

Хоть и ничего не понимаю, но 3D модели моё почтение👍👍👍 Никогда на просторах Ютуба подобные не встречал. Думаю на этом канале о многих танках можно узнать☺️

[@10TonneSkeleton]

Используй Я.Браузер, чтобы получить мгновенный перевод видео на русский язык

[@ЕгорЧерников-ъ7ъ]

@@10TonneSkeleton О, благодарю, теперь знаю где смотреть хентай на который пока перевод не завезли).

[@mrobocop1666]

@@10TonneSkeleton то, что у нас плохо с английским говорит лишь о том, что русский очень развитый язык и нам нём есть вся нужная информация, развлечения итд. Не зря же, будучи всего 9 по количеству знающих, занимает 2 место в интернете. И, наоборот, всякие мелкие страны и народы вроде финнов, эстонцев, английский знают идеально, ибо ничего на своём языке нет

[@АйназДавлетшин-ы8ю]

@@mrobocop1666 могу поспорить, так как я программист. Большинство годных материалов по программированию только на английском. На русском меньше.

[@Andy-kl1ry]

1. Hitting the carousel is extremely unlikely, because it is very low. The tower is torn off only when the reserve ammunition located in the niches of the tank ignites. Almost all tanks have such compartments in the hull. In the T-90, the carousel was additionally armored and the niches in the turret were removed to further reduce the likelihood of fire. 2. The presence of a steering wheel in the t-90 does not depend on the "overhead", but on the modification of the t-90. 3. If the carousel runs out of shells (and this happens extremely rarely), the tank commander and gunner act in turn as loaders. 4. The T-90 has significantly smaller areas of vulnerability compared to other tanks. 5. And most importantly, like previous tanks, the T-90 can fire missiles from a tank gun. You didn't say anything about it.

[@snuggleseal]

as we've seen in Ukraine the T90 is a terrible design

[@Andy-kl1ry]

Unfortunately, we have also seen the beautiful design of the burning Leopard and Challenger tanks, and someday we will see the design of the burning Abrams tank. ;) It doesn’t matter what a tank looks like, the main thing is that it performs its tasks. The designers of Russian tanks are brilliant because they very quickly adapted the tank for war with drones. English, German and American developers are not even going to do this. Which only emphasizes that the Russians are trying to save the lives of their fighters, while the Europeans and Americans are leading them to slaughter.@@snuggleseal

[@snuggleseal]

@Andy-kl1ry look at all that nonsense you just wrote! The point of the T90M being poorly designed is still the ammunition carousel sitting directly underneath the crew. We've seen in Ukraine the T90M be destroyed with basic drones that still are able to penetrate the ammunition, which causes the crew to burn alive, and the turret explodes. You can count on one hand the Challenger tanks destroyed, so stop trying to cope by changing the subject. we all know the Challenger and Abrams have far superior crew safety with completely segregated ammunition. We've seen in Ukraine the Russian T90 be destroyed with grenades, actual grenades not RPGs or other bombs, grenades dropped through an open hatch then the fire starts so fast the crew burn alive. It's a terrible design.

[@Andy-kl1ry]

Now you, read that nonsense you just wrote! :) Your knowledge about Russian tanks is limited only by the information that propagandists put into your head. That’s why you are so loudly indignant :)) If you had bothered to look for information a little, you would have been surprised to learn that almost all world tank building schools have the habit of storing ammunition inside the tank. Also, if you Googled a little, you would find statistics on the percentage of hits in the very bottom part of the tank's hull, which is where the carousel is located. The number of destroyed Challenger tanks can be counted on one hand, only because they are FORBIDDEN to be put into direct combat with Russian troops, so that their reputation is not destroyed in the same way as was done with the Leopard tanks. And it is for this same reason that the delivery of Abrams to the combat zone is being deliberately delayed. After all, no one will need a marketing tank that burns perfectly even if hit by a heavy machine gun ;)). And the new design of the T80 and T90, which I wrote about, provides protection against javelins and drones hitting an open hatch. By the way, most of these videos are fake, created by Ukrainian propaganda for simpletons like you. PS Believe less in propaganda and live more with your own mind, that is why God gave you mind.@@snuggleseal

[@paullakowski2509]

What a twisted point of view, @@Andy-kl1ry.most Leo tank survived the impact with the crew making an exist. The tank is often recovered to be repaired later,

[@balazsvarga4178]

3:11 The map shows gellért hill and the the southern part of buda castle, erzsébet bridge and inner Budapest. Nothing too interesting, but you can check it out if you are interested as a small fun fact

[@Aitelly]

Damn people are Smart

[@hypnomarket8649]

И, правда

[@Pakhira148]

This guy deserves a million subs! Such detailed animations, always wanted to know about Russian tank Designs in detail, thanks for this awesome content!

[@Aitelly]

thanks hope we get therse so we can hire more people

[@MSM5500]

"always wanted to know about Russian tank Designs " so now it's time to learn how to use a black plastic bag, babu.

[@armistx3890]

@@MSM5500Tell that to the crews of the recently destroyed Bradley, Max Pro and leopards

[@serialseatsniffer5610]

"content"

[@TranTran-ro8zb]

Many people misunderstood that if the turret don't fly the tank crew totally safe. The auto loader storage place right inside the driving cabin. Sound like sit on gun powder barrel but not really is. If some projectile can trigger that ammunition, it penetrated the armor and got in the driving cabin. An explode inside the cabin (which is a close space) would kill any crews inside. It mean if the bullet penetrated and explode inside there is not much hope for crew whether they are siting on a gun powder barrel or not. Heat ammunition main purpose is to behavior like that. It pen then explode inside spread hundred of sharps to crews' face. The separated ammunition storage design with blow off panel like Abraham only can protect crews if projectile hit the ammunition storage. The risk is still there if it hit the driving cabin. Maybe we won't see space projects like Rus Tanks but remember we don't need to open a pot's lid to well cook food inside. What cook the food in a pot is heat and pressure. The reason why Rus Tank seem lack of crew saving features is because it's mainly designed to fight on muddy land of east Europe plain. After all, if a Tank can move, all of safe features become useless. Moreover, they need small, low profile tank to hide in a vat open space.

[@brianbrian5842]

I think it's perfectly fine the way it is currently. It's a ton of fun to dive and play. It's an extremely good distraction tank too. I've turned many matches around just by dividing the enemys in half by having them chase me.

[@Aitelly]

😁

[@paullakowski2509]

what how do you drive and play????

[@brrrkic]

@@paullakowski2509 world of tanks game

[@awddwa6544]

You guys should try designing your own tank, would be a cool concept

[@Aitelly]

We are just amateur engineers. The real engineering are people from the 1940s

[@matiasbonta7829]

@@Aitelly lol no

[@a.t6066]

​@AiTelly they technology was amazing for what they had to work with. I recently saw the battleship iowa and was shocked the ingenious equipment and the capabilities it provided. All made with no cad, no automatic calculators, no computer algorithms. Just a man, his pen, and his brain. Much respect to engineers from the 40s. Real engineers

[@harshkolhe304]

the quality never disappoints

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 🙏

[@cesarcardenas3893]

Hace tiempo que no veía una animación de tan buena calidad. Felicitaciones!

[@Diomedes1]

Great animation 👌 What a well designed and compact tank the T-90M is. Bristling with ERA nevertheless

[@user62953]

as usually, on practice there are many nuances

[@Planner7]

This chanel never disappoints 👏🏽

[@Aitelly]

Glad to hear that

[@trollartruck4433]

thanks man il be driving the t90m soon

[@noobextgaming3655]

Next video should beon T14 Armata

[@Snp2024]

​@@kachala missile?

[@Sheba938]

Absolutely

[@alexeishayya-shirokov3603]

Excellent video given the amount of information available on the tank! There are conflicting reports on the driver's section, like the availability of an automatic transmission or a steering wheel, so it's understandable that you guys would stick to what is most likely the case.

[@richardvanbeek7763]

I can tell lots of work went into those models. Impressive.

[@jerisrabadi3247]

Amazing work

[@Aitelly]

Thanks

[@Maxim_aka_Doka]

Great job! Keep up the good work ! Отличная работа ! Продолжайте в том же духе !

[@Aitelly]

🕊️

[@Gryffoon]

The best video until today

[@abhishekmahanta1112]

Waiting for a video on T14 Amata ❤️

[@mikethompson2650]

We will have to wait for the Ukrainians to hopefully capture one. Then we can get a good look at it. Or maybe just as likely we can get a modern Clint Eastwood to drive it over to the west.

[@medbelheni9488]

@@mikethompson2650 Ukrainians won't capture one, they are busy begging and milking the west and grandpa biden for more weapons just so russia evaporate them in seconds and making a beautiful mashrooms out of them, and let's not forget the yummy kebab made out of the Ukrainian soldiers.

[@1ns0mn14]

@@mikethompson2650 russians did release photos and videos of the interior years ago

[@pifpaf2725]

@@mikethompson2650 Do you hope that hundreds of Ukrainians will die for you to have fun? Why do you hate Ukrainians so much?

[@mikethompson2650]

@@1ns0mn14 Yeah, not I remember that video on youtube, a Russian commercial sort of thing. But that really doesn't give us an idea of technical performance of the components or how well the new armor does work.

[@arunaschlevickas322]

8:28 Armor increase wont eliminate the problem, the explosion would rip that turret apart anyway. Its more about shrapnels of the entering projectiles not detonating them in the first place and causing, hopefully, less damage. 10:08 its called slat armour officially but welded structure is decribing it fairly well i guess 11:29 No mbt is suited for urban combat and its not due to power to weight ratio or ground pressure.. Some can do better than others but they all fail due to simple inability to even retaliate due to limited elevation of those big cannons and having so many exposed angles around you while your own situational awareness is si limited that you have to completely rely on other units. Not beeing political here but we saw russians try to bring their mbt's into urban places and it failed hard enough for them to avoid it after. But overall great job, I would not want to make it seem like the rest of the video was not great in terms of accuracy or visual representation. Im glad that this subject is getting more and more visual material.

[@tackytrooper]

Yeah if the turret gets penetrated the crew is probably finished regardless of what happens to the ammo. It doesn't take much to kill people when you're talking about pieces of white hot metal traveling hundreds of meters per second. You can turn the inside of a tank into a blender without much visual indication at all from the outside that anything is amiss...

[@definitelyfrank9341]

​@@tackytrooper The inside walls are lined with spall liner.

[@hansiminator69]

@@definitelyfrank9341 spall liner does definitely not mean, that the crew is completely safe from shrapnel and spalling

[@definitelyfrank9341]

@@hansiminator69 It helps a lot though.

[@tackytrooper]

@@definitelyfrank9341 On *some* tanks

[@dadtype2339]

A lot of work in these vids, and I THANK YOU ❤

[@Aitelly]

Glad you like them!

[@rikstanken3048]

As russian it is interesting for me what american thinks about T-90M

[@crusader_wolf1104]

I think it's a really cool tank aesthetically but performance wise it isn't the best, a lot of it's systems are fairly outdated compared to it's western counterparts

[@Aitelly]

We just love the engineering behind it

[@mirandela777]

@@crusader_wolf1104 "a lot of it's systems are fairly outdated " says who, the brainwashing western media ?

[@_Void_Archive_]

@@crusader_wolf1104 I am not sure that there are old systems on this version, besides, most of the US tanks are in an even older condition, only a few are undergoing modernization, and new tactics are almost not produced (leclerc and new leopards. Things are even worse with the Abrams now...)

[@alexmoos6858]

@@_Void_Archive_ Чувак, у него управление на рычагах, как на танках первой мировой. Двигатель по-сути от танка бт7м, который сколько не модернезируй он уже плохо тянет вес этого танка. Эти вся активная защита пустышка, она либо не работает, либо вообще не установлена.

[@monteiro5306]

When I think it's impossible for you to make even better videos than the previous ones, I see how wrong I am. YES, YOU CAN! Greetings from a Brazilian subscriber.

[@MaximRedin]

Nice video, thanks. I am watching you from Russia

[@samkienVN2K]

Very cool guys ! I hope you can do a Airborne IFV ! Like BMD-4M as well !

[@al-azimahmed1188]

Brilliant video with independent information. Good work lads keep it up

[@Lena-vw6ye]

Wow, I loved the presentation and the attention to detail that was put into this video.

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 🙏👍

[@megasalamandra3116]

Для механика-водителя не сильно принципиально руль или рычаги. Тоже самое касается и коробки передач КПП ручная или автоматическая. В любом случае любого механика можно обучить правильно пользоваться и тем и другим органом управления. Ручная КПП на т72 и т80 работают отлично и легко переключаются, управление рычагами вообще элементарное интуитивно понятное. Мне в свое время чтобы начать управлять этими танками понадобилось примерно две минуты на разъяснение , я дольше сиденье под себя настраивал. Так что советские и российские танки это шикарное воплощение в технике всех технологий и идей гениальных конструкторов СССР и России!

[@brianmurray1395]

EXCELLENT EXPLANATION

[@Aitelly]

You are excellent Brian!

[@INSVRGENT]

"We have to learn how to drive this tank in case the opportunity ever comes along" I wish!

[@Aitelly]

We wish too

[@INSVRGENT]

@@Aitelly Maybe one day

[@Subhumanoid_]

6:58 WHOA!! Easy there! I just wanted to see how the autoloader was animated, not go to Bahmut!!

[@ShadeAKAhayate]

Besides, it's too late. Artyomovsk now. But yeah, I also was expecting in-detail workings of autoloader, not the general overall picture.

[@c130-t6t]

That was a good video, But Zamn i did not expect what was said in the end, That's a good ass T90M Model mate, keep it up!

[@gauss_gun]

T90M does not have a hard-kill APS. Only a prototype called "Arena-M" was experimentally fitted on one, but this APS does not seem to be produced even at the scale of T-14's "Afganit" (it is speculated that around 100-200 T-14 were produced to this day)

[@Mister_Poo]

Thats why they said "Proposed" before mentioning hard-kill system

[@juryfilatov4520]

You are right, this protection can be installed on export tanks from 2019, but due to bureaucracy, the Russians cannot install it on their tanks. However, Arena M has great potential, it is much more successful than Afghanit

[@chilechichich465]

Arena-M was 2 years ago upgraded so it can defend tanks from top attacks BUT it was tested and accepted by the army only recently. Since November 2022, improved Arena-M is recommended as a standard equipment on T-90M.

[@andraslibal]

The animation quality is top notch

[@Aitelly]

Thanks

[@prosperkandafula7547]

We definitely need to know how to drive this tank...

[@Aitelly]

👍

[@DenisTriton]

Снимаю шляпу за столь детальный анализ и хорошую анимацию.

[@101-t6w9e]

шляпу снимают они, с неправильными характеристиками

[@rinsedpie]

Amazing graphics, animation and knowledge of the technology involved.

[@FilipDaFlippa]

These videos are incredible

[@Aitelly]

Thanks. We tried our best 🙏

[@davidndahura7437]

Good lessons taken from the platform thank you

[@MizanQistina]

Human loader is subjected to human weaknesses such as getting tired, hungry, sleepy, have to pee and poop. Also subjected to emotions and psychological weaknesses such as getting panic, scared, PTSD and other mental related stuff. Other than these, also subjected to injuries, sickness, diseases and lost of life. All these will make the tank unable to load it's gun. Auto-loader have no such weaknesses, can load the gun in crucial moment.

[@Aitelly]

🤔 hmmm

[@MizanQistina]

@@Aitelly What? Machines always do better than human, that's why they will steal our jobs and taking over the world 😂

[@roland11110010101]

It surely helped Iraqis in 2003.

[@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling]

I mean… that would go for literally ANY other crew member, especially the commander who has to lead his tank crew to victory is subject to all those you have listed but worse.

[@MizanQistina]

@@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling But they're not the one who RELOAD the gun, the most important job in a tank. If the gun can't reload, then the tank is useless. As mentioned, human reloader have a lot of disadvantages which could lead to the gun can't be reloaded.

[@spencer5028]

Love this Blender work, good stuff

[@Endy_Duffranee]

Хорошее видео, привет с Донбасса

[@thf1933]

What the hell are US tons? 😂 Ton is 1000 kilograms.

[@DogMan077]

2000 lbs, so slightly less than a metric ton.

[@9kk99k9k]

There is no such thing as a ton! AMERICA FIRST! AMERICAN TONS FIRST!

[@ScorgRus]

@@9kk99k9k 🤡🤡🤡

[@trololoev]

They measure things with legs, take pity on them

[@malebetegrrr5793]

@@DogMan077 I thought it was 334 ducks 😁

[@abuanwp]

Thanks for this video, I've been loitering around the nearby army camp to see if I could sneak on one to test drive.

[@mafia924_Sevastopol]

Отличная визуализация!

[@Globalscanningeyes]

Amazing 3d models.😍

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 🙏👍

[@aminrodriguez4707]

Man, i subscribed by the 2nd video watched. Righteous work man.

[@duythanhduong2897]

Good tank

[@kaijud8430]

A fantastic tank, shame it still has poor reverse speed

[@Ikiry-1]

I'll make you happy, the reverse speed was slightly increased, yeah, it's about like the t80

[@i_m_17]

Если не ошибаюсь то у т-90м уже другой двигатель, как и скорость заднего хода уже другая

[@Տիգրան-ժ1է]

@@i_m_17 Тут в трансмиссии дело

[@i_m_17]

@@Տիգրան-ժ1է да, знаю, с двиглом и её вроде меняли, видел 5 подбитых 90х на ожидании к ремонту, и задний ход стоит сказать не медленный, уж явно быстрее чем у обычных тэшек

[@mohammedabdulmahdi2068]

"I hope this basic explanation helps you drive the T-90 tank." Thanks, this video helped me drive my T-90, I am currently on my way to the white house to have some tea with the president.

[@g.zoltan]

This is really serious quality, however, I would question wether steering is done via clutches. I think it's done with 2 separate gearboxes for the tracks.

[@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here]

The T-90M uses a steering wheel, no clutches

[@bob38028]

This is not high quality. There are multiple spelling errors and the voiceover is clearly AI generated.

[@g.zoltan]

@@bob38028 Sure. But if you make 3D models you can tell what they did is INSANE. Especially for just 2 guys.

[@bob38028]

@@g.zoltan It's not that crazy, any engineer with Solidworks and a nice computer could do the same pretty easily, given time. This model might not even be theirs because of that possibility.

[@g.zoltan]

@@bob38028 I say that because that's exactly what I do and it looks easier than it is.

[@Yourlocalhuman8]

Oh, great video! But, i didnt see any part of this video of explaining the T-90M's Tube launched ATGM systems, how do they work?

[@mirandela777]

Not only that, he dismiss the autoloader at 12.03 on vid and "promote" the tank commander as a gun loader, lol !

[@Տիգրան-ժ1է]

By laser designator

[@i_m_17]

Ну как, есть много видеороликов где командиры экипажа танка наводят на цель птрк, я не знаю, управляет ли ей наводчик, или командир, но командир танка указывает цель

[@rexleague8740]

Okay, I do not have a clue how to pass my exam. But now I know how to operate a T90 Battle Tank :D

[@sirethanthegreat4069]

World’s most powerful tank. Has a flying turret 😂😂😂

[@osmacar5331]

Ok american keep consuming propaganda.

[@Titoist2]

Hahaha youre so funny 😐😐

[@sirethanthegreat4069]

@@Titoist2 thanks 🤣

[@ИгорьАведян]

Спасибо каналу, Всем кто поддерживал поставки танков леопард Украине желаю познакомиться с Т 90 лично и поближе к родному дому.

[@Россиябудетсчастливой]

ты аведян иди Арцах отвоёвывай и не вякай

[@ИгорьАведян]

@@Россиябудетсчастливой Не ссы , если увидишь т 90 у себя в Тель Авиве громко кричи по русски - " я свой"

[@Россиябудетсчастливой]

@@ИгорьАведян Никогда не был в Тель Авиве - это вы ары везде расползлись Одно ногу сказать точно - в боях за Арцах русских т 90 ты не увидел и не увидишь так что - все сам - все сам )))

[@aero_cats]

Best tank in the world!

[@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling]

One of*

[@kortofan_xd6749]

​@@Dr.KarlowTheOctolingonly after t14

[@foshizzlfizzl]

Unfortunately for today, the T-90M has not the same gun as the T-14. The 2A82 is not yet implemented in the T-90M.

[@PugilistCactus]

It won't be. 2A82 is for unmanned designs.

[@ДенисПасечников-й8з]

Т 90 М уже на сво работает.И посмотри как он колонну всу из 2 танков и 6 бмп разгромил.Видео уже в интернете

[@stevie7702]

Again another high quality video, I'm subscribing

[@maitreytelang2312]

Hi bro, I am truly in awe by the awesome quality of your videos. Could you please do a similar video on India’s T-90S Bhishma MBT?

[@PugilistCactus]

Its the same tank but with down graded hardware. Pretty much like the current T-90M seeing as they apparently can't afford to kit them out with intended gear.

[@Lyanguzov1]

​@@PugilistCactusвсе они могут, было бы желание.

[@kostau852]

sick

[@mohsenfarahani4440]

Thanks to dear 3d artists for making this eye catching video 🙏🌹👏👏

[@ПериметрПериметр]

The leopard tank does not have an automatic loader, but its turrets also fly. And in general, there is no difference whether the tank's turret is torn off or not, the crew dies anyway.

[@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling]

Not really. That’s because of the ammo in the hull, not in the turret or in a carousel magazine.

[@ПериметрПериметр]

@@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling Do not watch the stupid propaganda of the SNN.

[@DavidFMayerPhD]

IF it actually WORKED as advertised, and IF it were properly MAINTAINED, and IF the crew were properly TRAINED, it would be a formidable weapon.

[@AWtify]

Abrams?

[@dirtydawg4061]

i was late to my class because i was watching this, worth it now i know how to drive a tank

[@egorwest5753]

На данный момент лучший боевой танк в мире.

[@radekskuhra9536]

The animation is insanely good and overall the video has great potential, however the writing could be better! Try not to use "this" at the start of every sentence, my ears are hurting :D. The video is lacking an intro, you go from THIS is the tank to THIS is the autoloader without much coherence. The title of the video is also a mess, what are you trying to say? It would be much better to name it T 90 M / Main battle Tank engineering Explained (or something similar). I hope you will take this criticism to heart. I enjoyed the video bar some minor mistakes. Eliminate them and it could be perfect!

[@Aitelly]

We love both negative and positive comments

[@Aitelly]

Regarding the naming of the video KZbin is a different game . The algorithm doesn't like common titles.

[@tackytrooper]

Don't forget, "fire the tank." No, the gun is fired, not the tank, lol.

[@radekskuhra9536]

@@Aitelly well I don't know about that, but the title looks like somebody had a stroke writing it. It just looks unprofessional. The whole point of the video isn't only the autoloader so I don't really understand it, then again I don't run a ytb channel.

[@radekskuhra9536]

​@@tackytrooper yeah well, there are more issues like this in the video... The gun on T14 armata isn´t the same. Coaxial machine guns are coaxial thus they don´t need wooden handles. They don´t mention why Shtora isn´t fitted, it´s just interesting for them. They can´t pronounce relikt and don´t mention that it degrades penetration of different projectiles differently. The hard kill protection system isn´t even used. The pros and cons don´t make sense since the autoloader impacts the crew size, reload speed and reliability it is both a pro and a con.

[@abhinavsharansingh2033]

I feel confident to take control of that tank.

[@assiassi3067]

I once saw solo T-90M nuke 4 tanks, Shattered them.

[@User.EvilAssRaper]

John-90

[@X_Killer.]

video of how our Russian tank T 72 playfully destroyed 8 units of fascist armored vehicles at once. Call sign "Alyosha"

[@fonemnazagi2768]

The T90 is actually a great tank high mobility and low profiled but the only problem is that it more prioritizing the combat ability of the tank rather than the survivality of the soldiers.

[@MATERYK]

Why is that? If you're talking about the automatic loader, then not everything is so clear. 1) most shots arrive at the tower or upper frontal part, so the defeat of the automatic loader in scrap is extremely small, but even with this condition - the defeat of any tank in the lower frontal part, leads to its destruction in 80-90% of cases, which in total gives 0.5% of the difference in the probability of hitting the tank head-on. 2) when a tank is hit on board, the turret crew is hit (for all tanks), which allows you to make a second shot, finishing off the tank, here I don't see much difference whether the tank will be destroyed by an explosion or the destruction of the crew. 3) now it is worth mentioning the real argument: the defeat of the tank through the roof is really not uncommon, but it does not guarantee the defeat of the tank, because the cumulative jet needs to get to a place where there will be no crew, breech of the gun, or emptiness. There is about 15-20 such spaces in the tower% And now let's remember that the combat compartment of the tower relative to the hull occupies only 25-30%. As a result, we get a chance of detonating the automatic loader in the region of 5%, and this is without taking into account the fact that NLAW can fail, or the shooter himself will mess up (which will happen in most cases, because it is very difficult to shoot with such weapons without preparation) Conclusion: yes, the automatic loader does increase the chance of an explosion of ammunition, but this chance is + -3% (in comparison with other tanks, and I don't take into account those cases when NATO tanks have shells in the hull, which is quite common. (translation by yandex translator, there may be errors)

[@PugilistCactus]

​@@MATERYKT-90 gets hit, the only survivor will likely be the driver assuming they make it out in time. Western tanks allow for a bit more time to get out. Its been something in practice since the M4 sherman.

[@MATERYK]

@@PugilistCactus an extra 0.5-1 second will not give a huge advantage, I don't think this is a strong argument