Averroes vs Al-Ghazali: The Islamic Philosophy Showdown

Dive into the profound philosophical debates of the medieval Islamic world with our detailed exploration of Averroes' masterpiece, "The Incoherence of the Incoherence." In this video, we dissect Averroes' defense of Aristotelian philosophy against Al-Ghazali's critiques, highlighting key arguments on the eternity and incorruptibility of the world, God's knowledge and attributes, causality and miracles, and the spirituality and immortality of the soul. 🧠✨
Key Points Covered:
Eternity of the World: Averroes' refutation of Al-Ghazali's arguments.
Incorruptibility of the World: Examining the philosophical debate on the world's permanence.
God's Knowledge and Attributes: Understanding the nature of divine knowledge.
Causality and Miracles: Analyzing the possibility of divine intervention.
The Soul and Its Spirituality: Discussing the immortality of the soul.
Averroes, also known as Ibn Rushd, was a pivotal figure in both Islamic and Western philosophy. His works aimed to harmonize Islamic teachings with Aristotelian principles. Join us as we unravel the intricate philosophical discussions that shaped medieval thought and continue to influence modern philosophy.
Why Watch This Video?
Gain insights into one of the most significant philosophical battles in Islamic thought.
Understand the key arguments presented by Averroes and Al-Ghazali.
Explore the timeless relevance of Averroes' philosophical contributions.
📚 Remove the Dust from classic texts and discover the enduring wisdom they offer.
Don't Miss Out! Subscribe for more deep dives into philosophical works and their impact on both historical and contemporary thought.

[@Abuhan47]

Ibn Rushd > Averroes

[@fazrieisa6654]

Both were amazing thinkers, we as muslim should learn from both of them instead comparing

[@amarmurtaza4377]

@@fazrieisa6654both are same person.

[@area51xi]

The book is freaking me out.

[@mujahidhasan118]

Al-Ghazali Was not only a theologian Also One Of The Most biggest philosopher in Islamic history. we love both of them, ibn sina was a very controversial. still to this day he is controversial. thats why we have to go with al-ghazali. Al-Ghazali > Ibn Sina

[@TheFeatInk]

Damn, lose the sound effects next time

[@prasetyoardi7912]

I don't understand the incorruptible world concept (and everything else really). Is it as if the world is indestructible by nature?

[@mujahidhasan118]

Ibn Sina Was Born 980 AD Al-Ghazali Was Born 1058 AD Al-Ghazali destroyed Ibn Sina In Cosmological Argument.

[@bluesky45299]

Quran says: “Allah:there is no deity worthy of worship except he”:The Neccessary life/consciousness,sustainer of life/consciousness.” Wire like neuronal structures that conduct electricity via ions/neurotransmitters in the CNS/PNS possess no attribute of thinking/life and yet that has “randomly” led to life. Consciousness/thinking is an innate idea(“Fitra”)that is distinct from carbon skeleton and yet the materialist scientist believes that chemistry turned into biology via “god of randomness”/”Emergent property”/”law of nature”. Limited/Imperfect Consciousness can only stem from Necessary Consciousness (Allah-one/indivisible/loving/self-sufficient Infinite perfection)….

[@RackTomRememberance]

man - is this video introduced. Love hearing all the little tacti-cool sounds wrt medieval Islamic philosophy. I feel like I'm listening to Fox News.

[@MahfuzKhan7]

AI channel?

[@----f]

Yes