Avoiding Destructive Vibrations with Modal Frequency Simulations

  Рет қаралды 7,128

Autodesk Fusion

Autodesk Fusion

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 11
@weasdown
@weasdown 6 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it be better to have the lowest mode above the specified frequency range? That way when the motor is turning on and off it won't pass through the mode. Great video though, thanks team!
@adskFusion
@adskFusion 6 жыл бұрын
As I understand it, that situation - keeping the lowest mode above the frequency range - would be best. However, as long as the excitations are avoided in normal usage (vs startup/shutdown/pass through), I think most issues could be avoided. We'd love to hear others thoughts on this.
@weasdown
@weasdown 6 жыл бұрын
Hmm ok, thanks!
@adskFusion
@adskFusion 6 жыл бұрын
I could def be wrong. We have subject matter experts here I can and will forward this to.
@weasdown
@weasdown 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Nurhasanah-pu6on
@Nurhasanah-pu6on 26 күн бұрын
May I ask, why is there no additional load in the modal frequency simulation?
@AronGari
@AronGari 6 жыл бұрын
Always love seeing videos of features that I haven't learned yet that can expand my ability with Fusion; though it would be nice to have a little more of the whats, and whys than just "do this, then this, followed by this". Such as what do the different types of constants do, and why use one type over another. (Edit: this might be outside the intended purpose of these videos; if that is the case though it would be helpful to have a link in description to more in depth information.)
@adskFusion
@adskFusion 6 жыл бұрын
Most of our instruction covers 'picks-and-clicks', like this, but others get more into the "why" aspect. If I had to guess why it's because the former is easier to make. Thanks for writing in; we'll make more of an effort to covers these topics at a deeper level in the future!
@adskFusion
@adskFusion 6 жыл бұрын
BTW, just added a video focused on sim contact. The OTHER reason we might want to avoid getting to into the details is that these videos don't perform as well. Like right now that one has 11 likes and 1 downvote: bad comparably. Anyway, just wanted to give you a little more insight and let you know we posted the video on sim contact.
@molak34
@molak34 6 жыл бұрын
2:13 .... the 1/60 used in the calculations has nothing to do with the motor. Is the conversion factor to go from RPM to Hz.
@adskFusion
@adskFusion 6 жыл бұрын
Not sure what happened there. The graphics shows what you say (and is correct), but the voiceover deviated a bit. Sorry for any confusion that might have caused.
SIMULATION in FUSION 360: IMPROVE the STRENGTH of your 3D prints!
21:38
Staying Cool with Thermal Simulations
5:12
Autodesk Fusion
Рет қаралды 9 М.
99.9% IMPOSSIBLE
00:24
STORROR
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
“Don’t stop the chances.”
00:44
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
UFC 310 : Рахмонов VS Мачадо Гэрри
05:00
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Offline vs Online Bag Filters: Key Differences Explained for Engineers
4:16
SUPER FAST STUDY & Experiment
Рет қаралды 870
Checking Simulation Result Quality with Adaptive Meshing
7:49
Autodesk Fusion
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Interrogating an Assembly
5:30
Autodesk Fusion
Рет қаралды 4,9 М.
Static Stress Tutorial
5:36
Autodesk Fusion
Рет қаралды 23 М.
Surface Modeling with Fusion 360
13:35
Autodesk Fusion
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Captive Nut Technique in Fusion 360
8:57
Desktop Makes
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Shape Optimization Tutorial
8:31
Autodesk Fusion
Рет қаралды 69 М.
Modifying a High Poly STL in Fusion 360
24:58
Desktop Makes
Рет қаралды 118 М.
Tutorial 1.  Generative Design with Fusion 360
25:32
Lectures - Mechanical Engineering - UBC
Рет қаралды 4,5 М.
Modeling Methods
5:43
Autodesk Fusion
Рет қаралды 44 М.
99.9% IMPOSSIBLE
00:24
STORROR
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН